TheoremBase

Comparison with the series of the MkM_k gives absolute convergence at each point; splitting off the first n terms bounds the remainder by the n-th tail of that series, and the tails form a null sequence, which gives uniform convergence.

Proof

By Sequences of Real-Valued Maps: the Map of Pointwise Limits on a Subset, and the Sequence of Pointwise Partial Sums (ii), applied to (gk)k∈N(g_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}}, there is exactly one sequence (sn)n∈N(s_{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}} in RD\mathbb{R}^{D} with sn(x)=βˆ‘k=1ngk(x)s_{n}(x)=\sum_{k=1}^{n}g_{k}(x) for every n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N} and every x∈Dx\in D, so its terms are the maps sns_{n} of the statement; and for every x∈Sx\in S, (sn(x))n∈N(s_{n}(x))_{n\in\mathbb{N}} is the sequence of partial sums of (gk(x))k∈N(g_{k}(x))_{k\in\mathbb{N}}.

Proof of (i). Fix x∈Sx\in S. By hypothesis ∣gk(x)βˆ£β‰€Mk|g_{k}(x)|\le M_{k} for every k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}, and βˆ‘k=1∞Mk\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}M_{k} converges; so Series of Real Numbers with Nonnegative Terms, Comparison, Absolute Convergence and the Geometric Series (iv), applied to the sequences (gk(x))k∈N(g_{k}(x))_{k\in\mathbb{N}} and (Mk)k∈N(M_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}}, shows that βˆ‘k=1∞gk(x)\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}g_{k}(x) converges absolutely, and Series of Real Numbers with Nonnegative Terms, Comparison, Absolute Convergence and the Geometric Series (iii) shows that it converges. By Series of Real Numbers: Partial Sums, Convergence, the Sum and Absolute Convergence (ii), its sequence of partial sums (sn(x))n∈N(s_{n}(x))_{n\in\mathbb{N}} is convergent, and βˆ‘k=1∞gk(x)\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}g_{k}(x) is its limit lim⁑nβ†’βˆžsn(x)\lim_{n\to\infty}s_{n}(x).

So (sn(x))n∈N(s_{n}(x))_{n\in\mathbb{N}} is convergent for every x∈Sx\in S, and Sequences of Real-Valued Maps: the Map of Pointwise Limits on a Subset, and the Sequence of Pointwise Partial Sums (i), applied to the set DD, the subset SS and the sequence (sn)n∈N(s_{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}} in RD\mathbb{R}^{D}, gives exactly one map s:Sβ†’Rs:S\to\mathbb{R} with s(x)=lim⁑nβ†’βˆžsn(x)=βˆ‘k=1∞gk(x)s(x)=\lim_{n\to\infty}s_{n}(x)=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}g_{k}(x) for every x∈Sx\in S.

Proof of (ii). Fix n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}. Since βˆ‘k=1∞Mk\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}M_{k} converges, Elementary Properties of Series of Real Numbers: Linearity, Null Terms, the Cauchy Criterion, Index Shifts, Tails, Order and Telescoping (iv), applied to (Mk)k∈N(M_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} with p=np=n, shows that βˆ‘k=1∞Mn+k\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}M_{n+k} converges.

Fix x∈Sx\in S. By (i), βˆ‘k=1∞gk(x)\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}g_{k}(x) converges, so Elementary Properties of Series of Real Numbers: Linearity, Null Terms, the Cauchy Criterion, Index Shifts, Tails, Order and Telescoping (iv), applied to (gk(x))k∈N(g_{k}(x))_{k\in\mathbb{N}} with p=np=n, shows that βˆ‘k=1∞gn+k(x)\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}g_{n+k}(x) converges and

s(x)=βˆ‘k=1∞gk(x)=βˆ‘k=1ngk(x)+βˆ‘k=1∞gn+k(x)=sn(x)+βˆ‘k=1∞gn+k(x),s(x)=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}g_{k}(x)=\sum_{k=1}^{n}g_{k}(x)+\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}g_{n+k}(x)=s_{n}(x)+\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}g_{n+k}(x),

that is, s(x)βˆ’sn(x)=βˆ‘k=1∞gn+k(x)s(x)-s_{n}(x)=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}g_{n+k}(x). For every k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}, n+k∈Nn+k\in\mathbb{N} by Natural Numbers Are the Successors in Omega: One Is Least and Not a Successor of a Natural Number, the Successor Is Injective, and N Is Closed under Addition and Multiplication (vi), so the hypothesis gives ∣gn+k(x)βˆ£β‰€Mn+k|g_{n+k}(x)|\le M_{n+k}. Hence Series of Real Numbers with Nonnegative Terms, Comparison, Absolute Convergence and the Geometric Series (iv), applied to the sequences (gn+k(x))k∈N(g_{n+k}(x))_{k\in\mathbb{N}} and (Mn+k)k∈N(M_{n+k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}}, gives

∣s(x)βˆ’sn(x)∣=βˆ£βˆ‘k=1∞gn+k(x)βˆ£β‰€βˆ‘k=1∞Mn+k.|s(x)-s_{n}(x)|=\Big|\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}g_{n+k}(x)\Big|\le\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}M_{n+k}.

By Elementary Properties of Series of Real Numbers: Linearity, Null Terms, the Cauchy Criterion, Index Shifts, Tails, Order and Telescoping (v), applied to (Mk)k∈N(M_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}}, the sequence (βˆ‘k=1∞Mn+k)n∈N\big(\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}M_{n+k}\big)_{n\in\mathbb{N}} is a null sequence, that is, it converges to 00 in the sense of Convergent Sequences of Real Numbers (i). If Mkβ‰₯0M_{k}\ge0 for every k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}, then 0≀Mk≀Mk0\le M_{k}\le M_{k} for every k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}, and Series of Real Numbers with Nonnegative Terms, Comparison, Absolute Convergence and the Geometric Series (ii), applied with (Mk)k∈N(M_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} in place of both (ak)(a_{k}) and (bk)(b_{k}), gives 0β‰€βˆ‘k=1∞Mn+k0\le\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}M_{n+k} for every n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}.

Proof of (iii). By (ii), the sequence (βˆ‘k=1∞Mq+k)q∈N\big(\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}M_{q+k}\big)_{q\in\mathbb{N}} converges to 00. The choices are made in this order: a real Ξ΅>0\varepsilon>0 is given; then K∈NK\in\mathbb{N} is taken, by Convergent Sequences of Real Numbers (i) with limit 00, such that βˆ£βˆ‘k=1∞Mq+k∣<Ξ΅\big|\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}M_{q+k}\big|<\varepsilon for every q∈Nq\in\mathbb{N} with qβ‰₯Kq\ge K; then n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N} with nβ‰₯Kn\ge K and x∈Sx\in S are arbitrary. By Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares (ix), βˆ‘k=1∞Mn+k<Ξ΅\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}M_{n+k}<\varepsilon. By (ii) and Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares (i),

∣sn(x)βˆ’s(x)∣=∣s(x)βˆ’sn(x)βˆ£β‰€βˆ‘k=1∞Mn+k<Ξ΅.|s_{n}(x)-s(x)|=|s(x)-s_{n}(x)|\le\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}M_{n+k}<\varepsilon .

This is the condition of Pointwise and Uniform Convergence of a Sequence of Real-Valued Maps (ii), read with the sequence (sn)n∈N(s_{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}} in RD\mathbb{R}^{D}, E=SE=S and ss in place of ff; so (sn)n∈N(s_{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}} converges uniformly on SS to ss. Finally, let f:Eβ†’Rf:E\to\mathbb{R} with SβŠ†ES\subseteq E and f(x)=βˆ‘k=1∞gk(x)f(x)=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}g_{k}(x) for every x∈Sx\in S. Then f(x)=s(x)f(x)=s(x) for every x∈Sx\in S by (i), and the condition of Pointwise and Uniform Convergence of a Sequence of Real-Valued Maps (ii) involves the limit map only through its values at points of SS; so the same KK serves for ff, and (sn)n∈N(s_{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}} converges uniformly on SS to ff.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…