TheoremBase

W is bounded and continuous with exact delta-envelopes W -/+ delta E; at a touching point the penalised-extrema lemma gives mu-hat in DSigmaD_Sigma and grad w = grad phi +/- delta Sigma, so the diagonal witnesses reduce the shifted lifted operator to the integrated (weak-form) inequality for the semiconvex/semiconcave viscosity sub/supersolution w.

Proof

Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. Elementary arithmetic and order facts for real numbers (The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background §background) are used without citation. The quadruple (D,DΣ,E,Σ)(\mathcal{D},\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma},\mathcal{E},\Sigma) is a penalty pair by The Gaussian Free-Energy Pair is a Penalty Pair: Translations, the First Variation, Lower Semicontinuity, the Moment Bound and the Map Property §pair, and by The Gaussian Free-Energy Pair: Relative Entropy and Relative Score with Respect to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure §pair DΣ\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} is the set of μ∈D\mu\in\mathcal{D} of finite Fisher information relative to γc\gamma_{c}, where D\mathcal{D} is the set of μ∈P2(Rd)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) of finite relative entropy with respect to γc\gamma_{c}. Write FLF_{\mathrm{L}} for the lifted Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Hamilton-Jacobi operator with discount λ0\lambda_{0}, control cost θ\theta and running cost GG, an operator over DΣ\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} with

FL(ν,r,q,Y)=λ0r+θ2∥q∥ν2+a⟨ζνc,q⟩ν−G(ν),F_{\mathrm{L}}(\nu,r,q,Y)=\lambda_{0}r+\tfrac{\theta}{2}\lVert q\rVert_{\nu}^{2}+a\langle\zeta^{c}_{\nu},q\rangle_{\nu}-G(\nu),

and (FL)δ∓(F_{\mathrm{L}})^{\mp}_{\delta} for its δ\delta-shifts; by The Lifted Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Hamilton-Jacobi Equation Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure §equation, viscosity sub- and supersolutions of the lifted equation are those of Viscosity Subsolution, Supersolution and Solution of a Second-Order Equation on the Wasserstein Space §subsolution and Viscosity Subsolution, Supersolution and Solution of a Second-Order Equation on the Wasserstein Space §supersolution for FLF_{\mathrm{L}} relative to this pair.

Step 1 (growth and exact envelopes). Let b∈Rb\in\mathbb{R} satisfy ∣w(x)∣≤b|w(x)|\le b for every xx (Bounded Real-Valued Function on a Set). By Running Costs for N-Particle Systems: Integrals of Bounded Uniformly Continuous Functions and Costs of the Empirical Measure §integral, applied with m=dm=d and c=wc=w, the function ρ↦∫w dρ\rho\mapsto\int w\,d\rho on P2(Rd)\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) is uniformly continuous with absolute value at most bb; so it is continuous (A Uniformly Continuous Map Between Metric Spaces Is Continuous §continuous), its restriction WW is continuous on D\mathcal{D} relative to D\mathcal{D} (claim 1 of Restriction Stability of Continuity and of the Derivative), and ∣W(μ)∣≤b|W(\mu)|\le b for μ∈D\mu\in\mathcal{D}. Since 0≤E(μ)0\le\mathcal{E}(\mu) for μ∈D\mu\in\mathcal{D} (The Gaussian Free-Energy Pair is a Penalty Pair: Translations, the First Variation, Lower Semicontinuity, the Moment Bound and the Map Property §nonnegative), for every positive δ\delta and every μ∈D\mu\in\mathcal{D} we have W(μ)≤b+δ E(μ)W(\mu)\le b+\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\mu) and −b−δ E(μ)≤W(μ)-b-\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\mu)\le W(\mu); thus WW has penalty-subordinate growth from above and from below (Penalty-Subordinate Growth of a Function on the Penalty Domain §above, Penalty-Subordinate Growth of a Function on the Penalty Domain §below, with C=bC=b). As E\mathcal{E} is lower semicontinuous on D\mathcal{D} (The Gaussian Free-Energy Pair is a Penalty Pair: Translations, the First Variation, Lower Semicontinuity, the Moment Bound and the Map Property §lsc), Basic Properties of the Delta-Envelopes on the Wasserstein Space §exact gives, for every positive δ\delta, Wδ−=W−δEW^{-}_{\delta}=W-\delta\mathcal{E} and Wδ+=W+δEW^{+}_{\delta}=W+\delta\mathcal{E} on D\mathcal{D}.

Step 2 (the operator along ∇w\nabla w). Let EwE_{w}, DwDw and ∇w\nabla w be as in The Almost-Everywhere Gradient of a Lipschitz Semiconvex or Semiconcave Function Is Tangent at Every Absolutely Continuous Measure; these are the objects of the same names in Integrating a Semiconvex Viscosity Subsolution of the Penalty-Drift Equation against a Measure of Finite Relative Fisher Information for D=RdD=\mathbb{R}^{d}, and by The Almost-Everywhere Gradient of a Lipschitz Semiconvex or Semiconcave Function Is Tangent at Every Absolutely Continuous Measure §borel, ∥∇w(x)∥≤L\lVert\nabla w(x)\rVert\le L for every x∈Rdx\in\mathbb{R}^{d}. For x∈Ewx\in E_{w} one has ∇w(x)=Dw(x)\nabla w(x)=Dw(x), so 0≤∥Dw(x)∥≤L0\le\lVert Dw(x)\rVert\le L (the left inequality by Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n §square), and squaring these nonnegative numbers gives ∥Dw(x)∥2≤L2\lVert Dw(x)\rVert^{2}\le L^{2} for every x∈Ewx\in E_{w}. We claim: for every μ∈DΣ\mu\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} and Y∈S(d)Y\in\mathcal{S}(d), FL(μ,W(μ),∇w,Y)≤0F_{\mathrm{L}}(\mu,W(\mu),\nabla w,Y)\le0 under the hypotheses of clause 1, and FL(μ,W(μ),∇w,Y)≥0F_{\mathrm{L}}(\mu,W(\mu),\nabla w,Y)\ge0 under those of clause 2. Apply Integrating a Semiconvex Viscosity Subsolution of the Penalty-Drift Equation against a Measure of Finite Relative Fisher Information with D=RdD=\mathbb{R}^{d} (open by claim 1 of Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and CkC^k Maps are Continuous, convex directly from Convex Subset of Rn\mathbb{R}^n), U=VcU=V_{c}, λ=λ0\lambda=\lambda_{0}, κ=2a\kappa=2a (so that its a=κ/2a=\kappa/2 is our aa), θ′=θ\theta'=\theta, the running cost g~\tilde{g}, and A=L2A=L^{2}, B=0B=0, p0=0p_{0}=0 in the gradient bound. Its operator, λ0r+θ2∥p∥2+DVc(x)⋅p−2a2tr⁡(X)−g~(x)\lambda_{0}r+\tfrac{\theta}{2}\lVert p\rVert^{2}+DV_{c}(x)\cdot p-\tfrac{2a}{2}\operatorname{tr}(X)-\tilde{g}(x), is the formula of The Penalty-Drift Hamilton-Jacobi Equation on an Open Subset of Euclidean Space §operator for the data of the statement, so it is FF, and in both items viscosity sub- and supersolutions are those of Viscosity Subsolution and Supersolution of a Second-Order Equation (The Penalty-Drift Hamilton-Jacobi Equation on an Open Subset of Euclidean Space §equation). As D=RdD=\mathbb{R}^{d}, its zero extensions wˉ\bar{w} and gˉ\bar{g} are ww and g~\tilde{g}. Let μ∈DΣ\mu\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}; it has finite relative entropy and finite Fisher information relative to γc\gamma_{c}, so by Relative Entropy and Relative Score with Respect to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure: Comparison with the Entropy, the Score and the Relative Free Energy of a Quadratic Potential §relative-score, μ∈DVc,aΣ\mu\in\mathcal{D}^{\Sigma}_{V_{c},a} and ΣVc,a(μ)=a ζμc\Sigma_{V_{c},a}(\mu)=a\,\zeta^{c}_{\mu}. The functions ww, g~\tilde{g} and ∥∇w∥2\lVert\nabla w\rVert^{2} are Borel and bounded, hence μ\mu-integrable (Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §measures), and by linearity of the integral (Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable), Square-Integrable Vector Fields Against a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space, and Test Functions: Standing Notation §l2mu and bilinearity of the inner product,

∫(λ0w+θ2∥∇w∥2−g~)dμ+⟨ΣVc,a(μ),∇w⟩μ=λ0W(μ)+θ2∥∇w∥μ2+a⟨ζμc,∇w⟩μ−G(μ)=FL(μ,W(μ),∇w,Y).\int\Bigl(\lambda_{0}w+\tfrac{\theta}{2}\lVert\nabla w\rVert^{2}-\tilde{g}\Bigr)d\mu+\bigl\langle\Sigma_{V_{c},a}(\mu),\nabla w\bigr\rangle_{\mu}=\lambda_{0}W(\mu)+\tfrac{\theta}{2}\lVert\nabla w\rVert_{\mu}^{2}+a\langle\zeta^{c}_{\mu},\nabla w\rangle_{\mu}-G(\mu)=F_{\mathrm{L}}(\mu,W(\mu),\nabla w,Y).

Under the hypotheses of clause 1 this is ≤0\le0 by Integrating a Semiconvex Viscosity Subsolution of the Penalty-Drift Equation against a Measure of Finite Relative Fisher Information §subsolution; under those of clause 2 it is ≥0\ge0 by Integrating a Semiconvex Viscosity Subsolution of the Penalty-Drift Equation against a Measure of Finite Relative Fisher Information §supersolution.

Step 3 (witnesses at the touching point). Let μ^∈DΣ\hat{\mu}\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}, let φ\varphi be an intrinsic test function on D\mathcal{D} and ε>0\varepsilon>0, and take ν=μ^\nu=\hat{\mu}, π=(id,id)#μ^\pi=(\mathrm{id},\mathrm{id})_{\#}\hat{\mu}, q=∇φ(μ^)q=\nabla\varphi(\hat{\mu}), Y=Hφ(μ^)Y=H_{\varphi}(\hat{\mu}). Then π∈Π(μ^,μ^)\pi\in\Pi(\hat{\mu},\hat{\mu}) with I(π)=0<ε2I(\pi)=0<\varepsilon^{2} (Couplings on Euclidean Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, and the Lipschitz Bound §pushforward with S=T=idS=T=\mathrm{id}); for any u:D→Ru:\mathcal{D}\to\mathbb{R}, ∣u(ν)−u(μ^)∣=0<ε|u(\nu)-u(\hat{\mu})|=0<\varepsilon; the discrepancy of qq and ∇φ(μ^)\nabla\varphi(\hat{\mu}) along π\pi is ∥q−∇φ(μ^)∥μ^2=0<ε2\lVert q-\nabla\varphi(\hat{\mu})\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}^{2}=0<\varepsilon^{2} (The Discrepancy of Two Square-Integrable Vector Fields Along a Coupling of Their Base Measures §diagonal, Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space §vanishing); and ∥Y−Hφ(μ^)∥=0<ε\lVert Y-H_{\varphi}(\hat{\mu})\rVert=0<\varepsilon (Difference of Real Matrices, claim 4 of Properties of the Norm of a Symmetric Real Matrix).

Step 4 (clause 1). By Step 1, WW has penalty-subordinate growth from above. Let 0<δ<10<\delta<1, let φ\varphi be an intrinsic test function on D\mathcal{D}, let μ^∈D\hat{\mu}\in\mathcal{D} be a point at which Wδ−−φW^{-}_{\delta}-\varphi has a local maximum relative to D\mathcal{D}, and let ε>0\varepsilon>0. By Step 1, Wδ−−φ=W−δE−φW^{-}_{\delta}-\varphi=W-\delta\mathcal{E}-\varphi on D\mathcal{D}, so Penalised Extrema of the Integral of a Lipschitz Semiconvex Function Relative to the Gaussian Free-Energy Pair: Finite Relative Fisher Information and the First-Order Condition §maximum gives μ^∈DΣ\hat{\mu}\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} and ∇φ(μ^)+δ Σ(μ^)=∇w\nabla\varphi(\hat{\mu})+\delta\,\Sigma(\hat{\mu})=\nabla w in L2(μ^;Rd)L^{2}(\hat{\mu};\mathbb{R}^{d}). Take the witnesses of Step 3, and let s=Wδ−(μ^)∈Rs=W^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})\in\mathbb{R}, so that ∣s−Wδ−(μ^)∣=0<ε|s-W^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})|=0<\varepsilon. Since s+δ E(μ^)=W(μ^)s+\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\hat{\mu})=W(\hat{\mu}) by Step 1 and q+δ Σ(ν)=∇φ(μ^)+δ Σ(μ^)=∇wq+\delta\,\Sigma(\nu)=\nabla\varphi(\hat{\mu})+\delta\,\Sigma(\hat{\mu})=\nabla w in L2(μ^;Rd)L^{2}(\hat{\mu};\mathbb{R}^{d}), The Bundle of Vector Fields over a Set of Measures, Second-Order Equation Operators on the Wasserstein Space, and Their Delta-Shifts §shifted and Step 2 give

(FL)δ−(ν,s,q,Y)=FL(μ^,W(μ^),∇w,Y+δHE(μ^))≤0<ε.(F_{\mathrm{L}})^{-}_{\delta}(\nu,s,q,Y)=F_{\mathrm{L}}\bigl(\hat{\mu},W(\hat{\mu}),\nabla w,Y+\delta H_{\mathcal{E}}(\hat{\mu})\bigr)\le0<\varepsilon .

Every requirement of Viscosity Subsolution, Supersolution and Solution of a Second-Order Equation on the Wasserstein Space §subsolution is met, so WW is a viscosity subsolution of the lifted equation.

Step 5 (clause 2). By Step 1, WW has penalty-subordinate growth from below. Let 0<δ<10<\delta<1, φ\varphi an intrinsic test function on D\mathcal{D}, μ^∈D\hat{\mu}\in\mathcal{D} a point at which Wδ+−φ=W+δE−φW^{+}_{\delta}-\varphi=W+\delta\mathcal{E}-\varphi (Step 1) has a local minimum relative to D\mathcal{D}, and ε>0\varepsilon>0. By Penalised Extrema of the Integral of a Lipschitz Semiconvex Function Relative to the Gaussian Free-Energy Pair: Finite Relative Fisher Information and the First-Order Condition §minimum, μ^∈DΣ\hat{\mu}\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} and ∇φ(μ^)−δ Σ(μ^)=∇w\nabla\varphi(\hat{\mu})-\delta\,\Sigma(\hat{\mu})=\nabla w. Take the witnesses of Step 3, and let s=Wδ+(μ^)∈Rs=W^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})\in\mathbb{R}, so that ∣s−Wδ+(μ^)∣=0<ε|s-W^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})|=0<\varepsilon and s−δ E(μ^)=W(μ^)s-\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\hat{\mu})=W(\hat{\mu}), and with q−δ Σ(ν)=∇φ(μ^)−δ Σ(μ^)=∇wq-\delta\,\Sigma(\nu)=\nabla\varphi(\hat{\mu})-\delta\,\Sigma(\hat{\mu})=\nabla w in L2(μ^;Rd)L^{2}(\hat{\mu};\mathbb{R}^{d}), The Bundle of Vector Fields over a Set of Measures, Second-Order Equation Operators on the Wasserstein Space, and Their Delta-Shifts §shifted and Step 2 give

(FL)δ+(ν,s,q,Y)=FL(μ^,W(μ^),∇w,Y−δHE(μ^))≥0>−ε,(F_{\mathrm{L}})^{+}_{\delta}(\nu,s,q,Y)=F_{\mathrm{L}}\bigl(\hat{\mu},W(\hat{\mu}),\nabla w,Y-\delta H_{\mathcal{E}}(\hat{\mu})\bigr)\ge0>-\varepsilon ,

and every requirement of Viscosity Subsolution, Supersolution and Solution of a Second-Order Equation on the Wasserstein Space §supersolution is met, so WW is a viscosity supersolution of the lifted equation. ■\blacksquare

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…