We use the notation and claims of Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space and The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity, and Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field for real numbers. For b∈Sym(E) let Bb be the set of nonnegative real numbers C with ∣b(x,y)∣≤C∣x∣∣y∣ for all x,y∈E, as in Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Forms on a Real Inner Product Space: Norm, Order, Identity Form and Restriction §norm, so ∥b∥=infBb, and note 0≤∥b∥ since 0 is a lower bound of Bb. Let b∈Sym(E) and x,y,z∈E, λ∈R. From the symmetry, additivity and homogeneity conditions of Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Forms on a Real Inner Product Space: Norm, Order, Identity Form and Restriction §form: b(x,y+z)=b(y+z,x)=b(y,x)+b(z,x)=b(x,y)+b(x,z) and b(x,λy)=b(λy,x)=λb(y,x)=λb(x,y) (additivity and homogeneity in the second argument); b(−x,y)=b((−1)x,y)=−b(x,y) by claim 5 of Elementary Identities in a Vector Space, and likewise b(x,−y)=−b(x,y); hence b(x−y,z)=b(x,z)−b(y,z) and b(x,y−z)=b(x,y)−b(x,z); and b(0E,y)=b(0y,y)=0⋅b(y,y)=0 by claim 3 of Elementary Identities in a Vector Space. Expanding b(x±y,x±y) by additivity in both arguments and symmetry gives the expansions
b(x±y,x±y)=b(x,x)±2b(x,y)+b(y,y),hence4b(x,y)=b(x+y,x+y)−b(x−y,x−y).(P)
Claim 1. 0Sym is symmetric and bilinear and satisfies ∣0∣≤0⋅∣x∣∣y∣, so 0Sym∈Sym(E). The operations b1+b2 and λb stay in Sym(E) by Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Forms on a Real Inner Product Space: Norm, Order, Identity Form and Restriction §identity, and the eight conditions of Vector Space over a Field hold because they hold pointwise for real numbers; the zero vector is 0Sym and the additive inverse of b is (−1)b.
Claim 2. Let x,y∈E. If ∣x∣=0 or ∣y∣=0, then x=0E or y=0E (Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space §vanishing), so b(x,y)=0 and the inequality holds. Otherwise ∣x∣∣y∣>0 (claim 5 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field), and for every C∈Bb, ∣b(x,y)∣(∣x∣∣y∣)−1≤C (claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field); thus ∣b(x,y)∣(∣x∣∣y∣)−1 is a lower bound of Bb, hence at most ∥b∥, and multiplying by ∣x∣∣y∣ gives the inequality. If 0≤C and ∣b(x′,y′)∣≤C∣x′∣∣y′∣ for all x′,y′, then C∈Bb and ∥b∥≤C.
Claim 3. By claim 5 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field and claim 2, ∣(b1+b2)(x,y)∣≤∣b1(x,y)∣+∣b2(x,y)∣≤(∥b1∥+∥b2∥)∣x∣∣y∣, and the constant is nonnegative, so ∥b1+b2∥≤∥b1∥+∥b2∥ by claim 2. By claim 4 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, ∣(λb)(x,y)∣=∣λ∣∣b(x,y)∣≤∣λ∣∥b∥∣x∣∣y∣, so ∥λb∥≤∣λ∣∥b∥; if λ=0 both sides are 0 (0Sym has norm 0 since 0∈B0Sym), and if λ=0 then b=λ−1(λb) gives ∥b∥≤∣λ−1∣∥λb∥=∣λ∣−1∥λb∥ (claim 4 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field applied to λλ−1=1), so equality holds. If ∥b∥=0 then ∣b(x,y)∣≤0 for all x,y by claim 2, so b=0Sym; the converse was noted. For the identity form, ∣⟨x,y⟩∣≤1⋅∣x∣∣y∣ by The Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality in a Real Inner Product Space gives ∥I∥≤1, and if x=0E then ∣x∣2=∣⟨x,x⟩∣≤∥I∥∣x∣2 by claim 2, so 1≤∥I∥ after dividing by ∣x∣2>0.
Claim 4. By claim 3: dSym(b1,b2)=∥b1−b2∥≥0; it vanishes if and only if b1−b2=0Sym, that is b1=b2; ∥b2−b1∥=∥(−1)(b1−b2)∥=∥b1−b2∥; and ∥b1−b3∥=∥(b1−b2)+(b2−b3)∥≤∥b1−b2∥+∥b2−b3∥. These are the four conditions of Metric Space.
Claim 5. If ∥b∥≤c, then ∣b(x′,x′)∣≤∥b∥∣x′∣2≤c∣x′∣2 by claim 2 and claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. Conversely suppose ∣b(x′,x′)∣≤c∣x′∣2 for every x′∈E, and let x,y∈E. By (P), claim 5 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field and Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space §parallelogram,
4∣b(x,y)∣≤∣b(x+y,x+y)∣+∣b(x−y,x−y)∣≤c(∣x+y∣2+∣x−y∣2)=2c(∣x∣2+∣y∣2).
If ∣x∣=1=∣y∣ this gives ∣b(x,y)∣≤c. For general x,y with x=0E=y, put x′=∣x∣−1x and y′=∣y∣−1y, unit vectors by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space §homogeneity; bilinearity gives b(x,y)=∣x∣∣y∣b(x′,y′), so ∣b(x,y)∣=∣x∣∣y∣∣b(x′,y′)∣≤c∣x∣∣y∣. If x=0E or y=0E the inequality ∣b(x,y)∣≤c∣x∣∣y∣ is trivial. Hence c∈Bb and ∥b∥≤c.
Claim 6. By Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Forms on a Real Inner Product Space: Norm, Order, Identity Form and Restriction §order and Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Forms on a Real Inner Product Space: Norm, Order, Identity Form and Restriction §identity, −cI⪯b⪯cI means −c∣x∣2≤b(x,x)≤c∣x∣2 for every x∈E, which by claim 6 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field (with c∣x∣2 in the role of the bound) is equivalent to ∣b(x,x)∣≤c∣x∣2 for every x, hence to ∥b∥≤c by claim 5. The particular case is c=∥b∥.
Claim 7. Reflexivity and transitivity follow pointwise from those of ≤ on R (axioms of Total Order on a Set). If b1⪯b2 and b2⪯b1, then b1(x,x)=b2(x,x) for every x by antisymmetry of ≤, so b=b1−b2 satisfies b(x,x)=0 for every x, and (P) gives 4b(x,y)=0, hence b(x,y)=0, for all x,y; thus b1=b2.
Claim 8. Pointwise: if b1(x,x)≤b2(x,x) then b1(x,x)+b(x,x)≤b2(x,x)+b(x,x) (order axiom of Ordered Field), λb1(x,x)≤λb2(x,x) for 0≤λ (claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field) and λb2(x,x)≤λb1(x,x) for λ≤0 (apply the previous case to −λ≥0 and claim 4 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field); and two inequalities add by the compatibility of the order with addition (an axiom of Ordered Field), applied twice, and transitivity.
Claim 9. By bilinearity, b(x,x)−b(y,y)=b(x−y,x)+b(y,x−y), so by claims 5 and 4 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field and claim 2, ∣b(x,x)−b(y,y)∣≤∥b∥∣x−y∣∣x∣+∥b∥∣y∣∣x−y∣=∥b∥(∣x∣+∣y∣)∣x−y∣. Next b1(x,y)−b2(x,y)=(b1−b2)(x,y), so claim 2 gives the second inequality. Third, b(x′,y′)−b(x,y)=b(x′−x,y′)+b(x,y′−y), so ∣b(x′,y′)−b(x,y)∣≤∥b∥(∣x′−x∣∣y′∣+∣x∣∣y′−y∣) by claim 2. For the consequence, choose N0 with ∣xm−x∣<1 and ∣ym−y∣<1 for m≥N0, so that ∣xm∣≤∣x∣+1 and ∣ym∣≤∣y∣+1 by The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity §triangle. For m≥N0, by the second and third inequalities,
∣bm(xm,ym)−b(x,y)∣≤∣(bm−b)(xm,ym)∣+∣b(xm,ym)−b(x,y)∣≤∥bm−b∥(∣x∣+1)(∣y∣+1)+∥b∥(∣xm−x∣(∣y∣+1)+∣x∣∣ym−y∣).
Given ε>0, choose N≥N0 such that for m≥N: ∥bm−b∥<ε/(3(∣x∣+1)(∣y∣+1)), ∣xm−x∣<ε/(3(∥b∥+1)(∣y∣+1)) and ∣ym−y∣<ε/(3(∥b∥+1)(∣x∣+1)), using Convergent Sequence in a Metric Space in (E,d) and in (Sym(E),dSym) and claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Maximum of Two Elements, applied twice, to combine the three indices. Then each of the three terms is less than ε/3, so ∣bm(xm,ym)−b(x,y)∣<ε for m≥N, which is convergence in the sense of Limit of a Sequence of Real Numbers.
Claim 10. For x,y∈V, claim 2 and claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field (twice, as in Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Forms on a Real Inner Product Space: Norm, Order, Identity Form and Restriction §restriction) give ∣b(x,y)∣≤∥b∥∣x∣∣y∣≤∥b∥∣x∣V∣y∣V, so ∥b∥ belongs to the set whose infimum is ∥b∣V∥V, whence ∥b∣V∥V≤∥b∥. The identities (b1+b2)∣V=b1∣V+b2∣V and (λb)∣V=λ(b∣V) hold pointwise on V×V. If b1⪯b2, then b1(x,x)≤b2(x,x) for all x∈E, in particular for x∈V, so b1∣V⪯Vb2∣V. Finally IE∣V(x,x)=⟨x,x⟩=∣x∣2≤∣x∣V2=⟨x,x⟩V=IV(x,x) for x∈V, by claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field applied to 0≤∣x∣≤∣x∣V; so IE∣V⪯VIV.