TheoremBase

Proof of Elementary Properties of Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Forms: Norm, Quadratic Form, Order and Continuity

lemmalem:symmetric-bilinear-form-properties-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 8,987 chars · 16 deps · depth 13 Reason: P10.1 Batch 1a proof.

The norm statements mirror those for bounded linear maps; the quadratic form controls the norm through the polarisation identity 4b(x,y)=b(x+y,x+y)-b(x-y,x-y); the order statements are pointwise, antisymmetry again by polarisation; continuity by splitting differences bilinearly.

Proof

We use the notation and claims of Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space and The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity, and Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field for real numbers. For bSym(E)b\in\mathrm{Sym}(E) let BbB_{b} be the set of nonnegative real numbers CC with b(x,y)Cxy|b(x,y)|\le C|x||y| for all x,yEx,y\in E, as in Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Forms on a Real Inner Product Space: Norm, Order, Identity Form and Restriction §norm, so b=infBb\lVert b\rVert=\inf B_{b}, and note 0b0\le\lVert b\rVert since 00 is a lower bound of BbB_{b}. Let bSym(E)b\in\mathrm{Sym}(E) and x,y,zEx,y,z\in E, λR\lambda\in\mathbb{R}. From the symmetry, additivity and homogeneity conditions of Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Forms on a Real Inner Product Space: Norm, Order, Identity Form and Restriction §form: b(x,y+z)=b(y+z,x)=b(y,x)+b(z,x)=b(x,y)+b(x,z)b(x,y+z)=b(y+z,x)=b(y,x)+b(z,x)=b(x,y)+b(x,z) and b(x,λy)=b(λy,x)=λb(y,x)=λb(x,y)b(x,\lambda y)=b(\lambda y,x)=\lambda b(y,x)=\lambda b(x,y) (additivity and homogeneity in the second argument); b(x,y)=b((1)x,y)=b(x,y)b(-x,y)=b((-1)x,y)=-b(x,y) by claim 5 of Elementary Identities in a Vector Space, and likewise b(x,y)=b(x,y)b(x,-y)=-b(x,y); hence b(xy,z)=b(x,z)b(y,z)b(x-y,z)=b(x,z)-b(y,z) and b(x,yz)=b(x,y)b(x,z)b(x,y-z)=b(x,y)-b(x,z); and b(0E,y)=b(0y,y)=0b(y,y)=0b(0_{E},y)=b(0\,y,y)=0\cdot b(y,y)=0 by claim 3 of Elementary Identities in a Vector Space. Expanding b(x±y,x±y)b(x\pm y,x\pm y) by additivity in both arguments and symmetry gives the expansions

b(x±y,x±y)=b(x,x)±2b(x,y)+b(y,y),hence4b(x,y)=b(x+y,x+y)b(xy,xy).(P)b(x\pm y,x\pm y)=b(x,x)\pm 2b(x,y)+b(y,y),\qquad\text{hence}\qquad 4\,b(x,y)=b(x+y,x+y)-b(x-y,x-y). \tag{P}

Claim 1. 0Sym0_{\mathrm{Sym}} is symmetric and bilinear and satisfies 00xy|0|\le 0\cdot|x||y|, so 0SymSym(E)0_{\mathrm{Sym}}\in\mathrm{Sym}(E). The operations b1+b2b_{1}+b_{2} and λb\lambda b stay in Sym(E)\mathrm{Sym}(E) by Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Forms on a Real Inner Product Space: Norm, Order, Identity Form and Restriction §identity, and the eight conditions of Vector Space over a Field hold because they hold pointwise for real numbers; the zero vector is 0Sym0_{\mathrm{Sym}} and the additive inverse of bb is (1)b(-1)b.

Claim 2. Let x,yEx,y\in E. If x=0|x|=0 or y=0|y|=0, then x=0Ex=0_{E} or y=0Ey=0_{E} (Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space §vanishing), so b(x,y)=0b(x,y)=0 and the inequality holds. Otherwise xy>0|x||y|>0 (claim 5 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field), and for every CBbC\in B_{b}, b(x,y)(xy)1C|b(x,y)|\,(|x||y|)^{-1}\le C (claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field); thus b(x,y)(xy)1|b(x,y)|(|x||y|)^{-1} is a lower bound of BbB_{b}, hence at most b\lVert b\rVert, and multiplying by xy|x||y| gives the inequality. If 0C0\le C and b(x,y)Cxy|b(x',y')|\le C|x'||y'| for all x,yx',y', then CBbC\in B_{b} and bC\lVert b\rVert\le C.

Claim 3. By claim 5 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field and claim 2, (b1+b2)(x,y)b1(x,y)+b2(x,y)(b1+b2)xy|(b_{1}+b_{2})(x,y)|\le|b_{1}(x,y)|+|b_{2}(x,y)|\le(\lVert b_{1}\rVert+\lVert b_{2}\rVert)|x||y|, and the constant is nonnegative, so b1+b2b1+b2\lVert b_{1}+b_{2}\rVert\le\lVert b_{1}\rVert+\lVert b_{2}\rVert by claim 2. By claim 4 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, (λb)(x,y)=λb(x,y)λbxy|(\lambda b)(x,y)|=|\lambda||b(x,y)|\le|\lambda|\lVert b\rVert|x||y|, so λbλb\lVert\lambda b\rVert\le|\lambda|\lVert b\rVert; if λ=0\lambda=0 both sides are 00 (0Sym0_{\mathrm{Sym}} has norm 00 since 0B0Sym0\in B_{0_{\mathrm{Sym}}}), and if λ0\lambda\ne 0 then b=λ1(λb)b=\lambda^{-1}(\lambda b) gives bλ1λb=λ1λb\lVert b\rVert\le|\lambda^{-1}|\,\lVert\lambda b\rVert=|\lambda|^{-1}\lVert\lambda b\rVert (claim 4 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field applied to λλ1=1\lambda\lambda^{-1}=1), so equality holds. If b=0\lVert b\rVert=0 then b(x,y)0|b(x,y)|\le 0 for all x,yx,y by claim 2, so b=0Symb=0_{\mathrm{Sym}}; the converse was noted. For the identity form, x,y1xy|\langle x,y\rangle|\le 1\cdot|x||y| by The Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality in a Real Inner Product Space gives I1\lVert I\rVert\le 1, and if x0Ex\ne 0_{E} then x2=x,xIx2|x|^{2}=|\langle x,x\rangle|\le\lVert I\rVert|x|^{2} by claim 2, so 1I1\le\lVert I\rVert after dividing by x2>0|x|^{2}>0.

Claim 4. By claim 3: dSym(b1,b2)=b1b20d_{\mathrm{Sym}}(b_{1},b_{2})=\lVert b_{1}-b_{2}\rVert\ge 0; it vanishes if and only if b1b2=0Symb_{1}-b_{2}=0_{\mathrm{Sym}}, that is b1=b2b_{1}=b_{2}; b2b1=(1)(b1b2)=b1b2\lVert b_{2}-b_{1}\rVert=\lVert(-1)(b_{1}-b_{2})\rVert=\lVert b_{1}-b_{2}\rVert; and b1b3=(b1b2)+(b2b3)b1b2+b2b3\lVert b_{1}-b_{3}\rVert=\lVert(b_{1}-b_{2})+(b_{2}-b_{3})\rVert\le\lVert b_{1}-b_{2}\rVert+\lVert b_{2}-b_{3}\rVert. These are the four conditions of Metric Space.

Claim 5. If bc\lVert b\rVert\le c, then b(x,x)bx2cx2|b(x',x')|\le\lVert b\rVert|x'|^{2}\le c|x'|^{2} by claim 2 and claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. Conversely suppose b(x,x)cx2|b(x',x')|\le c|x'|^{2} for every xEx'\in E, and let x,yEx,y\in E. By (P), claim 5 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field and Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space §parallelogram,

4b(x,y)b(x+y,x+y)+b(xy,xy)c(x+y2+xy2)=2c(x2+y2).4|b(x,y)|\le|b(x+y,x+y)|+|b(x-y,x-y)|\le c\bigl(|x+y|^{2}+|x-y|^{2}\bigr)=2c\bigl(|x|^{2}+|y|^{2}\bigr).

If x=1=y|x|=1=|y| this gives b(x,y)c|b(x,y)|\le c. For general x,yx,y with x0Eyx\ne 0_{E}\ne y, put x=x1xx'=|x|^{-1}x and y=y1yy'=|y|^{-1}y, unit vectors by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space §homogeneity; bilinearity gives b(x,y)=xyb(x,y)b(x,y)=|x||y|\,b(x',y'), so b(x,y)=xyb(x,y)cxy|b(x,y)|=|x||y|\,|b(x',y')|\le c|x||y|. If x=0Ex=0_{E} or y=0Ey=0_{E} the inequality b(x,y)cxy|b(x,y)|\le c|x||y| is trivial. Hence cBbc\in B_{b} and bc\lVert b\rVert\le c.

Claim 6. By Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Forms on a Real Inner Product Space: Norm, Order, Identity Form and Restriction §order and Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Forms on a Real Inner Product Space: Norm, Order, Identity Form and Restriction §identity, cIbcI-cI\preceq b\preceq cI means cx2b(x,x)cx2-c|x|^{2}\le b(x,x)\le c|x|^{2} for every xEx\in E, which by claim 6 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field (with cx2c|x|^{2} in the role of the bound) is equivalent to b(x,x)cx2|b(x,x)|\le c|x|^{2} for every xx, hence to bc\lVert b\rVert\le c by claim 5. The particular case is c=bc=\lVert b\rVert.

Claim 7. Reflexivity and transitivity follow pointwise from those of \le on R\mathbb{R} (axioms of Total Order on a Set). If b1b2b_{1}\preceq b_{2} and b2b1b_{2}\preceq b_{1}, then b1(x,x)=b2(x,x)b_{1}(x,x)=b_{2}(x,x) for every xx by antisymmetry of \le, so b=b1b2b=b_{1}-b_{2} satisfies b(x,x)=0b(x,x)=0 for every xx, and (P) gives 4b(x,y)=04b(x,y)=0, hence b(x,y)=0b(x,y)=0, for all x,yx,y; thus b1=b2b_{1}=b_{2}.

Claim 8. Pointwise: if b1(x,x)b2(x,x)b_{1}(x,x)\le b_{2}(x,x) then b1(x,x)+b(x,x)b2(x,x)+b(x,x)b_{1}(x,x)+b(x,x)\le b_{2}(x,x)+b(x,x) (order axiom of Ordered Field), λb1(x,x)λb2(x,x)\lambda b_{1}(x,x)\le\lambda b_{2}(x,x) for 0λ0\le\lambda (claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field) and λb2(x,x)λb1(x,x)\lambda b_{2}(x,x)\le\lambda b_{1}(x,x) for λ0\lambda\le 0 (apply the previous case to λ0-\lambda\ge 0 and claim 4 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field); and two inequalities add by the compatibility of the order with addition (an axiom of Ordered Field), applied twice, and transitivity.

Claim 9. By bilinearity, b(x,x)b(y,y)=b(xy,x)+b(y,xy)b(x,x)-b(y,y)=b(x-y,x)+b(y,x-y), so by claims 5 and 4 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field and claim 2, b(x,x)b(y,y)bxyx+byxy=b(x+y)xy|b(x,x)-b(y,y)|\le\lVert b\rVert|x-y||x|+\lVert b\rVert|y||x-y|=\lVert b\rVert(|x|+|y|)|x-y|. Next b1(x,y)b2(x,y)=(b1b2)(x,y)b_{1}(x,y)-b_{2}(x,y)=(b_{1}-b_{2})(x,y), so claim 2 gives the second inequality. Third, b(x,y)b(x,y)=b(xx,y)+b(x,yy)b(x',y')-b(x,y)=b(x'-x,y')+b(x,y'-y), so b(x,y)b(x,y)b(xxy+xyy)|b(x',y')-b(x,y)|\le\lVert b\rVert(|x'-x||y'|+|x||y'-y|) by claim 2. For the consequence, choose N0N_{0} with xmx<1|x_{m}-x|<1 and ymy<1|y_{m}-y|<1 for mN0m\ge N_{0}, so that xmx+1|x_{m}|\le|x|+1 and ymy+1|y_{m}|\le|y|+1 by The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity §triangle. For mN0m\ge N_{0}, by the second and third inequalities,

bm(xm,ym)b(x,y)(bmb)(xm,ym)+b(xm,ym)b(x,y)bmb(x+1)(y+1)+b(xmx(y+1)+xymy).|b_{m}(x_{m},y_{m})-b(x,y)|\le|(b_{m}-b)(x_{m},y_{m})|+|b(x_{m},y_{m})-b(x,y)|\le\lVert b_{m}-b\rVert(|x|+1)(|y|+1)+\lVert b\rVert\bigl(|x_{m}-x|(|y|+1)+|x||y_{m}-y|\bigr).

Given ε>0\varepsilon>0, choose NN0N\ge N_{0} such that for mNm\ge N: bmb<ε/(3(x+1)(y+1))\lVert b_{m}-b\rVert<\varepsilon/(3(|x|+1)(|y|+1)), xmx<ε/(3(b+1)(y+1))|x_{m}-x|<\varepsilon/(3(\lVert b\rVert+1)(|y|+1)) and ymy<ε/(3(b+1)(x+1))|y_{m}-y|<\varepsilon/(3(\lVert b\rVert+1)(|x|+1)), using Convergent Sequence in a Metric Space in (E,d)(E,d) and in (Sym(E),dSym)(\mathrm{Sym}(E),d_{\mathrm{Sym}}) and claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Maximum of Two Elements, applied twice, to combine the three indices. Then each of the three terms is less than ε/3\varepsilon/3, so bm(xm,ym)b(x,y)<ε|b_{m}(x_{m},y_{m})-b(x,y)|<\varepsilon for mNm\ge N, which is convergence in the sense of Limit of a Sequence of Real Numbers.

Claim 10. For x,yVx,y\in V, claim 2 and claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field (twice, as in Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Forms on a Real Inner Product Space: Norm, Order, Identity Form and Restriction §restriction) give b(x,y)bxybxVyV|b(x,y)|\le\lVert b\rVert|x||y|\le\lVert b\rVert|x|_{V}|y|_{V}, so b\lVert b\rVert belongs to the set whose infimum is bVV\lVert b|_{V}\rVert_{V}, whence bVVb\lVert b|_{V}\rVert_{V}\le\lVert b\rVert. The identities (b1+b2)V=b1V+b2V(b_{1}+b_{2})|_{V}=b_{1}|_{V}+b_{2}|_{V} and (λb)V=λ(bV)(\lambda b)|_{V}=\lambda(b|_{V}) hold pointwise on V×VV\times V. If b1b2b_{1}\preceq b_{2}, then b1(x,x)b2(x,x)b_{1}(x,x)\le b_{2}(x,x) for all xEx\in E, in particular for xVx\in V, so b1VVb2Vb_{1}|_{V}\preceq_{V}b_{2}|_{V}. Finally IEV(x,x)=x,x=x2xV2=x,xV=IV(x,x)I_{E}|_{V}(x,x)=\langle x,x\rangle=|x|^{2}\le|x|_{V}^{2}=\langle x,x\rangle_{V}=I_{V}(x,x) for xVx\in V, by claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field applied to 0xxV0\le|x|\le|x|_{V}; so IEVVIVI_{E}|_{V}\preceq_{V}I_{V}.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Comments

Loading…