TheoremBase

The norm statements mirror those for bounded linear maps; the quadratic form controls the norm through the polarisation identity 4b(x,y)=b(x+y,x+y)-b(x-y,x-y); the order statements are pointwise, antisymmetry again by polarisation; continuity by splitting differences bilinearly.

Proof

We use the notation and claims of Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space and The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity, and Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field for real numbers. For b∈Sym(E)b\in\mathrm{Sym}(E) let BbB_{b} be the set of nonnegative real numbers CC with ∣b(x,y)∣≤C∣x∣∣y∣|b(x,y)|\le C|x||y| for all x,y∈Ex,y\in E, as in Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Forms on a Real Inner Product Space: Norm, Order, Identity Form and Restriction (ii), so ∥b∥=inf⁡Bb\lVert b\rVert=\inf B_{b}, and note 0≤∥b∥0\le\lVert b\rVert since 00 is a lower bound of BbB_{b}. Let b∈Sym(E)b\in\mathrm{Sym}(E) and x,y,z∈Ex,y,z\in E, λ∈R\lambda\in\mathbb{R}. From the symmetry, additivity and homogeneity conditions of Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Forms on a Real Inner Product Space: Norm, Order, Identity Form and Restriction (i): b(x,y+z)=b(y+z,x)=b(y,x)+b(z,x)=b(x,y)+b(x,z)b(x,y+z)=b(y+z,x)=b(y,x)+b(z,x)=b(x,y)+b(x,z) and b(x,λy)=b(λy,x)=λb(y,x)=λb(x,y)b(x,\lambda y)=b(\lambda y,x)=\lambda b(y,x)=\lambda b(x,y) (additivity and homogeneity in the second argument); b(−x,y)=b((−1)x,y)=−b(x,y)b(-x,y)=b((-1)x,y)=-b(x,y) by claim 5 of Elementary Identities in a Vector Space, and likewise b(x,−y)=−b(x,y)b(x,-y)=-b(x,y); hence b(x−y,z)=b(x,z)−b(y,z)b(x-y,z)=b(x,z)-b(y,z) and b(x,y−z)=b(x,y)−b(x,z)b(x,y-z)=b(x,y)-b(x,z); and b(0E,y)=b(0 y,y)=0⋅b(y,y)=0b(0_{E},y)=b(0\,y,y)=0\cdot b(y,y)=0 by claim 3 of Elementary Identities in a Vector Space. Expanding b(x±y,x±y)b(x\pm y,x\pm y) by additivity in both arguments and symmetry gives the expansions

b(x±y,x±y)=b(x,x)±2b(x,y)+b(y,y),hence4 b(x,y)=b(x+y,x+y)−b(x−y,x−y).(P)b(x\pm y,x\pm y)=b(x,x)\pm 2b(x,y)+b(y,y),\qquad\text{hence}\qquad 4\,b(x,y)=b(x+y,x+y)-b(x-y,x-y). \tag{P}

Claim 1. 0Sym0_{\mathrm{Sym}} is symmetric and bilinear and satisfies ∣0∣≤0⋅∣x∣∣y∣|0|\le 0\cdot|x||y|, so 0Sym∈Sym(E)0_{\mathrm{Sym}}\in\mathrm{Sym}(E). The operations b1+b2b_{1}+b_{2} and λb\lambda b stay in Sym(E)\mathrm{Sym}(E) by Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Forms on a Real Inner Product Space: Norm, Order, Identity Form and Restriction (iv), and the eight conditions of Vector Space over a Field hold because they hold pointwise for real numbers; the zero vector is 0Sym0_{\mathrm{Sym}} and the additive inverse of bb is (−1)b(-1)b.

Claim 2. Let x,y∈Ex,y\in E. If ∣x∣=0|x|=0 or ∣y∣=0|y|=0, then x=0Ex=0_{E} or y=0Ey=0_{E} (Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space (iii)), so b(x,y)=0b(x,y)=0 and the inequality holds. Otherwise ∣x∣∣y∣>0|x||y|>0 (claim 5 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field), and for every C∈BbC\in B_{b}, ∣b(x,y)∣ (∣x∣∣y∣)−1≤C|b(x,y)|\,(|x||y|)^{-1}\le C (claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field); thus ∣b(x,y)∣(∣x∣∣y∣)−1|b(x,y)|(|x||y|)^{-1} is a lower bound of BbB_{b}, hence at most ∥b∥\lVert b\rVert, and multiplying by ∣x∣∣y∣|x||y| gives the inequality. If 0≤C0\le C and ∣b(x′,y′)∣≤C∣x′∣∣y′∣|b(x',y')|\le C|x'||y'| for all x′,y′x',y', then C∈BbC\in B_{b} and ∥b∥≤C\lVert b\rVert\le C.

Claim 3. By claim 5 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field and claim 2, ∣(b1+b2)(x,y)∣≤∣b1(x,y)∣+∣b2(x,y)∣≤(∥b1∥+∥b2∥)∣x∣∣y∣|(b_{1}+b_{2})(x,y)|\le|b_{1}(x,y)|+|b_{2}(x,y)|\le(\lVert b_{1}\rVert+\lVert b_{2}\rVert)|x||y|, and the constant is nonnegative, so ∥b1+b2∥≤∥b1∥+∥b2∥\lVert b_{1}+b_{2}\rVert\le\lVert b_{1}\rVert+\lVert b_{2}\rVert by claim 2. By claim 4 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, ∣(λb)(x,y)∣=∣λ∣∣b(x,y)∣≤∣λ∣∥b∥∣x∣∣y∣|(\lambda b)(x,y)|=|\lambda||b(x,y)|\le|\lambda|\lVert b\rVert|x||y|, so ∥λb∥≤∣λ∣∥b∥\lVert\lambda b\rVert\le|\lambda|\lVert b\rVert; if λ=0\lambda=0 both sides are 00 (0Sym0_{\mathrm{Sym}} has norm 00 since 0∈B0Sym0\in B_{0_{\mathrm{Sym}}}), and if λ≠0\lambda\ne 0 then b=λ−1(λb)b=\lambda^{-1}(\lambda b) gives ∥b∥≤∣λ−1∣ ∥λb∥=∣λ∣−1∥λb∥\lVert b\rVert\le|\lambda^{-1}|\,\lVert\lambda b\rVert=|\lambda|^{-1}\lVert\lambda b\rVert (claim 4 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field applied to λλ−1=1\lambda\lambda^{-1}=1), so equality holds. If ∥b∥=0\lVert b\rVert=0 then ∣b(x,y)∣≤0|b(x,y)|\le 0 for all x,yx,y by claim 2, so b=0Symb=0_{\mathrm{Sym}}; the converse was noted. For the identity form, ∣⟨x,y⟩∣≤1⋅∣x∣∣y∣|\langle x,y\rangle|\le 1\cdot|x||y| by The Cauchy–Schwarz Inequality in a Real Inner Product Space gives ∥I∥≤1\lVert I\rVert\le 1, and if x≠0Ex\ne 0_{E} then ∣x∣2=∣⟨x,x⟩∣≤∥I∥∣x∣2|x|^{2}=|\langle x,x\rangle|\le\lVert I\rVert|x|^{2} by claim 2, so 1≤∥I∥1\le\lVert I\rVert after dividing by ∣x∣2>0|x|^{2}>0.

Claim 4. By claim 3: dSym(b1,b2)=∥b1−b2∥≥0d_{\mathrm{Sym}}(b_{1},b_{2})=\lVert b_{1}-b_{2}\rVert\ge 0; it vanishes if and only if b1−b2=0Symb_{1}-b_{2}=0_{\mathrm{Sym}}, that is b1=b2b_{1}=b_{2}; ∥b2−b1∥=∥(−1)(b1−b2)∥=∥b1−b2∥\lVert b_{2}-b_{1}\rVert=\lVert(-1)(b_{1}-b_{2})\rVert=\lVert b_{1}-b_{2}\rVert; and ∥b1−b3∥=∥(b1−b2)+(b2−b3)∥≤∥b1−b2∥+∥b2−b3∥\lVert b_{1}-b_{3}\rVert=\lVert(b_{1}-b_{2})+(b_{2}-b_{3})\rVert\le\lVert b_{1}-b_{2}\rVert+\lVert b_{2}-b_{3}\rVert. These are the four conditions of Metric Space.

Claim 5. If ∥b∥≤c\lVert b\rVert\le c, then ∣b(x′,x′)∣≤∥b∥∣x′∣2≤c∣x′∣2|b(x',x')|\le\lVert b\rVert|x'|^{2}\le c|x'|^{2} by claim 2 and claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. Conversely suppose ∣b(x′,x′)∣≤c∣x′∣2|b(x',x')|\le c|x'|^{2} for every x′∈Ex'\in E, and let x,y∈Ex,y\in E. By (P), claim 5 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field and Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space (vi),

4∣b(x,y)∣≤∣b(x+y,x+y)∣+∣b(x−y,x−y)∣≤c(∣x+y∣2+∣x−y∣2)=2c(∣x∣2+∣y∣2).4|b(x,y)|\le|b(x+y,x+y)|+|b(x-y,x-y)|\le c\bigl(|x+y|^{2}+|x-y|^{2}\bigr)=2c\bigl(|x|^{2}+|y|^{2}\bigr).

If ∣x∣=1=∣y∣|x|=1=|y| this gives ∣b(x,y)∣≤c|b(x,y)|\le c. For general x,yx,y with x≠0E≠yx\ne 0_{E}\ne y, put x′=∣x∣−1xx'=|x|^{-1}x and y′=∣y∣−1yy'=|y|^{-1}y, unit vectors by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space (iv); bilinearity gives b(x,y)=∣x∣∣y∣ b(x′,y′)b(x,y)=|x||y|\,b(x',y'), so ∣b(x,y)∣=∣x∣∣y∣ ∣b(x′,y′)∣≤c∣x∣∣y∣|b(x,y)|=|x||y|\,|b(x',y')|\le c|x||y|. If x=0Ex=0_{E} or y=0Ey=0_{E} the inequality ∣b(x,y)∣≤c∣x∣∣y∣|b(x,y)|\le c|x||y| is trivial. Hence c∈Bbc\in B_{b} and ∥b∥≤c\lVert b\rVert\le c.

Claim 6. By Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Forms on a Real Inner Product Space: Norm, Order, Identity Form and Restriction (iii) and Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Forms on a Real Inner Product Space: Norm, Order, Identity Form and Restriction (iv), −cI⪯b⪯cI-cI\preceq b\preceq cI means −c∣x∣2≤b(x,x)≤c∣x∣2-c|x|^{2}\le b(x,x)\le c|x|^{2} for every x∈Ex\in E, which by claim 6 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field (with c∣x∣2c|x|^{2} in the role of the bound) is equivalent to ∣b(x,x)∣≤c∣x∣2|b(x,x)|\le c|x|^{2} for every xx, hence to ∥b∥≤c\lVert b\rVert\le c by claim 5. The particular case is c=∥b∥c=\lVert b\rVert.

Claim 7. Reflexivity and transitivity follow pointwise from those of ≤\le on R\mathbb{R} (axioms of Total Order on a Set). If b1⪯b2b_{1}\preceq b_{2} and b2⪯b1b_{2}\preceq b_{1}, then b1(x,x)=b2(x,x)b_{1}(x,x)=b_{2}(x,x) for every xx by antisymmetry of ≤\le, so b=b1−b2b=b_{1}-b_{2} satisfies b(x,x)=0b(x,x)=0 for every xx, and (P) gives 4b(x,y)=04b(x,y)=0, hence b(x,y)=0b(x,y)=0, for all x,yx,y; thus b1=b2b_{1}=b_{2}.

Claim 8. Pointwise: if b1(x,x)≤b2(x,x)b_{1}(x,x)\le b_{2}(x,x) then b1(x,x)+b(x,x)≤b2(x,x)+b(x,x)b_{1}(x,x)+b(x,x)\le b_{2}(x,x)+b(x,x) (order axiom of Ordered Field), λb1(x,x)≤λb2(x,x)\lambda b_{1}(x,x)\le\lambda b_{2}(x,x) for 0≤λ0\le\lambda (claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field) and λb2(x,x)≤λb1(x,x)\lambda b_{2}(x,x)\le\lambda b_{1}(x,x) for λ≤0\lambda\le 0 (apply the previous case to −λ≥0-\lambda\ge 0 and claim 4 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field); and two inequalities add by the compatibility of the order with addition (an axiom of Ordered Field), applied twice, and transitivity.

Claim 9. By bilinearity, b(x,x)−b(y,y)=b(x−y,x)+b(y,x−y)b(x,x)-b(y,y)=b(x-y,x)+b(y,x-y), so by claims 5 and 4 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field and claim 2, ∣b(x,x)−b(y,y)∣≤∥b∥∣x−y∣∣x∣+∥b∥∣y∣∣x−y∣=∥b∥(∣x∣+∣y∣)∣x−y∣|b(x,x)-b(y,y)|\le\lVert b\rVert|x-y||x|+\lVert b\rVert|y||x-y|=\lVert b\rVert(|x|+|y|)|x-y|. Next b1(x,y)−b2(x,y)=(b1−b2)(x,y)b_{1}(x,y)-b_{2}(x,y)=(b_{1}-b_{2})(x,y), so claim 2 gives the second inequality. Third, b(x′,y′)−b(x,y)=b(x′−x,y′)+b(x,y′−y)b(x',y')-b(x,y)=b(x'-x,y')+b(x,y'-y), so ∣b(x′,y′)−b(x,y)∣≤∥b∥(∣x′−x∣∣y′∣+∣x∣∣y′−y∣)|b(x',y')-b(x,y)|\le\lVert b\rVert(|x'-x||y'|+|x||y'-y|) by claim 2. For the consequence, choose N0N_{0} with ∣xm−x∣<1|x_{m}-x|<1 and ∣ym−y∣<1|y_{m}-y|<1 for m≥N0m\ge N_{0}, so that ∣xm∣≤∣x∣+1|x_{m}|\le|x|+1 and ∣ym∣≤∣y∣+1|y_{m}|\le|y|+1 by The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity (i). For m≥N0m\ge N_{0}, by the second and third inequalities,

∣bm(xm,ym)−b(x,y)∣≤∣(bm−b)(xm,ym)∣+∣b(xm,ym)−b(x,y)∣≤∥bm−b∥(∣x∣+1)(∣y∣+1)+∥b∥(∣xm−x∣(∣y∣+1)+∣x∣∣ym−y∣).|b_{m}(x_{m},y_{m})-b(x,y)|\le|(b_{m}-b)(x_{m},y_{m})|+|b(x_{m},y_{m})-b(x,y)|\le\lVert b_{m}-b\rVert(|x|+1)(|y|+1)+\lVert b\rVert\bigl(|x_{m}-x|(|y|+1)+|x||y_{m}-y|\bigr).

Given ε>0\varepsilon>0, choose N≥N0N\ge N_{0} such that for m≥Nm\ge N: ∥bm−b∥<ε/(3(∣x∣+1)(∣y∣+1))\lVert b_{m}-b\rVert<\varepsilon/(3(|x|+1)(|y|+1)), ∣xm−x∣<ε/(3(∥b∥+1)(∣y∣+1))|x_{m}-x|<\varepsilon/(3(\lVert b\rVert+1)(|y|+1)) and ∣ym−y∣<ε/(3(∥b∥+1)(∣x∣+1))|y_{m}-y|<\varepsilon/(3(\lVert b\rVert+1)(|x|+1)), using Convergent Sequence in a Metric Space in (E,d)(E,d) and in (Sym(E),dSym)(\mathrm{Sym}(E),d_{\mathrm{Sym}}) and claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Maximum of Two Elements, applied twice, to combine the three indices. Then each of the three terms is less than ε/3\varepsilon/3, so ∣bm(xm,ym)−b(x,y)∣<ε|b_{m}(x_{m},y_{m})-b(x,y)|<\varepsilon for m≥Nm\ge N, which is convergence in the sense of Limit of a Sequence of Real Numbers.

Claim 10. For x,y∈Vx,y\in V, claim 2 and claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field (twice, as in Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Forms on a Real Inner Product Space: Norm, Order, Identity Form and Restriction (v)) give ∣b(x,y)∣≤∥b∥∣x∣∣y∣≤∥b∥∣x∣V∣y∣V|b(x,y)|\le\lVert b\rVert|x||y|\le\lVert b\rVert|x|_{V}|y|_{V}, so ∥b∥\lVert b\rVert belongs to the set whose infimum is ∥b∣V∥V\lVert b|_{V}\rVert_{V}, whence ∥b∣V∥V≤∥b∥\lVert b|_{V}\rVert_{V}\le\lVert b\rVert. The identities (b1+b2)∣V=b1∣V+b2∣V(b_{1}+b_{2})|_{V}=b_{1}|_{V}+b_{2}|_{V} and (λb)∣V=λ(b∣V)(\lambda b)|_{V}=\lambda(b|_{V}) hold pointwise on V×VV\times V. If b1⪯b2b_{1}\preceq b_{2}, then b1(x,x)≤b2(x,x)b_{1}(x,x)\le b_{2}(x,x) for all x∈Ex\in E, in particular for x∈Vx\in V, so b1∣V⪯Vb2∣Vb_{1}|_{V}\preceq_{V}b_{2}|_{V}. Finally IE∣V(x,x)=⟨x,x⟩=∣x∣2≤∣x∣V2=⟨x,x⟩V=IV(x,x)I_{E}|_{V}(x,x)=\langle x,x\rangle=|x|^{2}\le|x|_{V}^{2}=\langle x,x\rangle_{V}=I_{V}(x,x) for x∈Vx\in V, by claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field applied to 0≤∣x∣≤∣x∣V0\le|x|\le|x|_{V}; so IE∣V⪯VIVI_{E}|_{V}\preceq_{V}I_{V}.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…