Proof sketch: induction on the dimension; Lebesgue measure on ℝ¹ is the image of Lebesgue measure on ℝ, and in the step Tonelli's formula for ℝⁿ⁺¹ = ℝⁿ × ℝ¹ splits off the last factor, constants in [0,∞] being pulled out of integrals.
Throughout, composites and products of measurable functions into are measurable, and the product of is associative and commutative (all background of the setting). For and write for .
Step 1 (dimension one). Let . The function of Borel Sets of ℝ^{m+n} and the Product σ-Algebra of ℝ^m and ℝ^n (iii) is a bijection whose inverse is -measurable. For we have , so by Lebesgue Measure on ℝ^{m+n} as the Product of Lebesgue Measures on ℝ^m and ℝ^n (i); that is, the image measure of under is
The change of variables Image Measures and Measures with a Density: Measures, Integrals and Change of Variables (ii) along , applied to , therefore gives
Step 2 (proof of (i)). We prove the clause, measurability of included, for all by induction on (Induction for Predicative Formulas, and the Order of ℕ below 1 and below n+1 (i); the condition on is predicative by The Borel Sets of ℝⁿ, Lebesgue Measure on ℝⁿ and Integrals against It Are Predicative in the Dimension (iii), The Simple, Nonnegative, Integrable and Signed Integrals Are Predicative in the Measure and the Function, at Any Variable Positions (ii), and the formula trees of Formula Trees with Values: Syntax, Two Readings, and Definedness (i) with The Graph Reading of a Formula Tree Is Predicative and Agrees with Its Reading, So the Reading Is Predicative (i), The Graph Reading of a Formula Tree Is Predicative and Agrees with Its Reading, So the Reading Is Predicative (ii) and Predicative Formulas for the Vocabulary of Finite Combinatorics, at Any Variable Positions (ii), Predicative Formulas for the Vocabulary of Finite Combinatorics, at Any Variable Positions (iv), Predicative Formulas for the Vocabulary of Finite Combinatorics, at Any Variable Positions (vi)). For , by Iterated Operations: Recursion, Splitting, Reordering, Termwise Combination and Homomorphisms (i), that is, , which is measurable because is (Step 1); by the same clause , so Step 1 with gives the claim. For the step from to , let ; the induction hypothesis is applied to , the restriction of to , and gives that is measurable and satisfies the clause. Let be the concatenation function; for and (Concatenation Identifies a Product of Euclidean Spaces with a Euclidean Space (ii)), so by Iterated Operations: Recursion, Splitting, Reordering, Termwise Combination and Homomorphisms (i)
so that for with . With and the projections of onto its factors, this says
a product of composites of measurable functions: is measurable by Borel Sets of ℝ^{m+n} and the Product σ-Algebra of ℝ^m and ℝ^n (ii), and by The Product σ-Algebra: Rectangles, Generators, Sections, Projections, Pairings and the Swap (vi), by Step 1, and by the induction hypothesis. So is measurable by the opening paragraph, which is the measurability part of the claim for . By Tonelli's formula Lebesgue Measure on ℝ^{m+n} as the Product of Lebesgue Measures on ℝ^m and ℝ^n (iv), with dimensions and , then The Integral of a Multiple by a Constant in [0,∞], the Constant ∞ Included (i) with and Step 1 for the inner integral, The Integral of a Multiple by a Constant in [0,∞], the Constant ∞ Included (i) with for the outer one, and the induction hypothesis,
which is by Iterated Operations: Recursion, Splitting, Reordering, Termwise Combination and Homomorphisms (i).
Step 3 (proof of (ii)). By Integrals over Measurable Subsets (i), and for every . Let for be the integrand of (ii). Then equals the function that (i) gives for the family , as the two agree at every , and (i) for this family gives the claim.
Loading…