TheoremBase

Proof sketch: induction on the dimension; Lebesgue measure on ℝ¹ is the image of Lebesgue measure on ℝ, and in the step Tonelli's formula for ℝⁿ⁺¹ = ℝⁿ × ℝ¹ splits off the last factor, constants in [0,∞] being pulled out of integrals.

Proof

Throughout, composites and products of measurable functions into [0,∞][0,\infty] are measurable, and the product of [0,∞][0,\infty] is associative and commutative (all background of the setting). For p∈Np\in\mathbb{N} and h1,…,hph_{1},\dots,h_{p} write Fp(x)=∏j=1phj(xj)F_{p}(x)=\prod_{j=1}^{p}h_{j}(x_{j}) for x∈Rpx\in\mathbb{R}^{p}.

Step 1 (dimension one). Let g∈M+(R,B(R))g\in\mathcal{M}^{+}(\mathbb{R},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})). The function τ:R→R1\tau:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}^{1} of Borel Sets of ℝ^{m+n} and the Product σ-Algebra of ℝ^m and ℝ^n (iii) is a bijection whose inverse τ−1:η↦η1\tau^{-1}:\eta\mapsto\eta_{1} is B(R1)/B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{1})/\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})-measurable. For B∈B(R)B\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) we have (τ−1)−1[B]=τ[B](\tau^{-1})^{-1}[B]=\tau[B], so λ1((τ−1)−1[B])=λ(B)\lambda_{1}((\tau^{-1})^{-1}[B])=\lambda(B) by Lebesgue Measure on ℝ^{m+n} as the Product of Lebesgue Measures on ℝ^m and ℝ^n (i); that is, the image measure of λ1\lambda_{1} under τ−1\tau^{-1} is

λ1∘(τ−1)−1=λ.\lambda_{1}\circ(\tau^{-1})^{-1}=\lambda .

The change of variables Image Measures and Measures with a Density: Measures, Integrals and Change of Variables (ii) along τ−1\tau^{-1}, applied to gg, therefore gives

∫R1g(η1) dλ1(η)=∫Rg d(λ1∘(τ−1)−1)=∫Rg dλ.\int_{\mathbb{R}^{1}}g(\eta_{1})\,d\lambda_{1}(\eta)=\int_{\mathbb{R}}g\,d(\lambda_{1}\circ(\tau^{-1})^{-1})=\int_{\mathbb{R}}g\,d\lambda .

Step 2 (proof of (i)). We prove the clause, measurability of FpF_{p} included, for all h1,…,hph_{1},\dots,h_{p} by induction on pp (Induction for Predicative Formulas, and the Order of ℕ below 1 and below n+1 (i); the condition on pp is predicative by The Borel Sets of ℝⁿ, Lebesgue Measure on ℝⁿ and Integrals against It Are Predicative in the Dimension (iii), The Simple, Nonnegative, Integrable and Signed Integrals Are Predicative in the Measure and the Function, at Any Variable Positions (ii), and the formula trees of Formula Trees with Values: Syntax, Two Readings, and Definedness (i) with The Graph Reading of a Formula Tree Is Predicative and Agrees with Its Reading, So the Reading Is Predicative (i), The Graph Reading of a Formula Tree Is Predicative and Agrees with Its Reading, So the Reading Is Predicative (ii) and Predicative Formulas for the Vocabulary of Finite Combinatorics, at Any Variable Positions (ii), Predicative Formulas for the Vocabulary of Finite Combinatorics, at Any Variable Positions (iv), Predicative Formulas for the Vocabulary of Finite Combinatorics, at Any Variable Positions (vi)). For p=1p=1, F1(x)=h1(x1)F_{1}(x)=h_{1}(x_{1}) by Iterated Operations: Recursion, Splitting, Reordering, Termwise Combination and Homomorphisms (i), that is, F1=h1∘τ−1F_{1}=h_{1}\circ\tau^{-1}, which is measurable because τ−1\tau^{-1} is (Step 1); by the same clause ∏j=11∫Rhj dλ=∫Rh1 dλ\prod_{j=1}^{1}\int_{\mathbb{R}}h_{j}\,d\lambda=\int_{\mathbb{R}}h_{1}\,d\lambda, so Step 1 with g=h1g=h_{1} gives the claim. For the step from pp to p+1p+1, let h1,…,hp+1∈M+(R,B(R))h_{1},\dots,h_{p+1}\in\mathcal{M}^{+}(\mathbb{R},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})); the induction hypothesis is applied to h1,…,hph_{1},\dots,h_{p}, the restriction of j↦hjj\mapsto h_{j} to [p][p], and gives that FpF_{p} is measurable and satisfies the clause. Let ι:Rp×R1→Rp+1\iota:\mathbb{R}^{p}\times\mathbb{R}^{1}\to\mathbb{R}^{p+1} be the concatenation function; ι(ξ,η)j=ξj\iota(\xi,\eta)_{j}=\xi_{j} for j∈[p]j\in[p] and ι(ξ,η)p+1=η1\iota(\xi,\eta)_{p+1}=\eta_{1} (Concatenation Identifies a Product of Euclidean Spaces with a Euclidean Space (ii)), so by Iterated Operations: Recursion, Splitting, Reordering, Termwise Combination and Homomorphisms (i)

Fp+1(ι(ξ,η))=Fp(ξ)⋅hp+1(η1),F_{p+1}(\iota(\xi,\eta))=F_{p}(\xi)\cdot h_{p+1}(\eta_{1}),

so that Fp+1(x)=Fp(ξ)⋅hp+1(xp+1)F_{p+1}(x)=F_{p}(\xi)\cdot h_{p+1}(x_{p+1}) for x∈Rp+1x\in\mathbb{R}^{p+1} with ι−1(x)=(ξ,η)\iota^{-1}(x)=(\xi,\eta). With π1\pi_{1} and π2\pi_{2} the projections of Rp×R1\mathbb{R}^{p}\times\mathbb{R}^{1} onto its factors, this says

Fp+1=(Fp∘π1∘ι−1)⋅(hp+1∘τ−1∘π2∘ι−1),F_{p+1}=(F_{p}\circ\pi_{1}\circ\iota^{-1})\cdot(h_{p+1}\circ\tau^{-1}\circ\pi_{2}\circ\iota^{-1}),

a product of composites of measurable functions: ι−1\iota^{-1} is measurable by Borel Sets of ℝ^{m+n} and the Product σ-Algebra of ℝ^m and ℝ^n (ii), π1\pi_{1} and π2\pi_{2} by The Product σ-Algebra: Rectangles, Generators, Sections, Projections, Pairings and the Swap (vi), τ−1\tau^{-1} by Step 1, and FpF_{p} by the induction hypothesis. So Fp+1F_{p+1} is measurable by the opening paragraph, which is the measurability part of the claim for p+1p+1. By Tonelli's formula Lebesgue Measure on ℝ^{m+n} as the Product of Lebesgue Measures on ℝ^m and ℝ^n (iv), with dimensions pp and 11, then The Integral of a Multiple by a Constant in [0,∞], the Constant ∞ Included (i) with c=Fp(ξ)c=F_{p}(\xi) and Step 1 for the inner integral, The Integral of a Multiple by a Constant in [0,∞], the Constant ∞ Included (i) with c=∫Rhp+1 dλc=\int_{\mathbb{R}}h_{p+1}\,d\lambda for the outer one, and the induction hypothesis,

∫Rp+1Fp+1 dλp+1=∫RpFp(ξ)⋅(∫Rhp+1 dλ)dλp(ξ)=(∏j=1p∫Rhj dλ)⋅∫Rhp+1 dλ,\int_{\mathbb{R}^{p+1}}F_{p+1}\,d\lambda_{p+1}=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{p}}F_{p}(\xi)\cdot\Bigl(\int_{\mathbb{R}}h_{p+1}\,d\lambda\Bigr)d\lambda_{p}(\xi)=\Bigl(\prod_{j=1}^{p}\int_{\mathbb{R}}h_{j}\,d\lambda\Bigr)\cdot\int_{\mathbb{R}}h_{p+1}\,d\lambda ,

which is ∏j=1p+1∫Rhj dλ\prod_{j=1}^{p+1}\int_{\mathbb{R}}h_{j}\,d\lambda by Iterated Operations: Recursion, Splitting, Reordering, Termwise Combination and Homomorphisms (i).

Step 3 (proof of (ii)). By Integrals over Measurable Subsets (i), hj1Bj∈M+(R,B(R))h_{j}\mathbf{1}_{B_{j}}\in\mathcal{M}^{+}(\mathbb{R},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})) and ∫Rhj1Bj dλ=∫Bjhj dλ\int_{\mathbb{R}}h_{j}\mathbf{1}_{B_{j}}\,d\lambda=\int_{B_{j}}h_{j}\,d\lambda for every j∈[n]j\in[n]. Let G(x)=∏j=1n(hj1Bj)(xj)G(x)=\prod_{j=1}^{n}(h_{j}\mathbf{1}_{B_{j}})(x_{j}) for x∈Rnx\in\mathbb{R}^{n} be the integrand of (ii). Then GG equals the function that (i) gives for the family j↦hj1Bjj\mapsto h_{j}\mathbf{1}_{B_{j}}, as the two agree at every xx, and (i) for this family gives the claim.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…