TheoremBase

Proof of Wasserstein Estimates for Affine Push-Forwards, First and Quadratic Moments, and the Cost of a Joint Law

lemmalem:nc-affine-moments-wasserstein-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 15,968 chars · 27 deps · depth 24 Reason: Layer C: proof of the Wasserstein estimates for affine push-forwards and moments.

An optimal coupling is pushed forward by a doubled affine datum to a coupling of the push-forwards whose cost is bounded by the squared norm of the datum times the original cost; the moment estimates follow from the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for the pairing of an optimal coupling, and the Cauchy and cost statements are direct consequences.

Proof

Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. Finite sums follow the rules of Properties of Finite Sums of Vectors and Properties of Finite Sums: claim 1 gives the recursion, claim 2 additivity, claim 3 homogeneity, claim 4 (vectors) says a linear map commutes with a finite sum, claim 6 (numbers) bounds a nonnegative summand by the sum, and claim 7 treats a single possibly nonzero summand. Claim 1 of Comparison and Absolute Value Bounds for Finite Sums of Real Numbers compares finite sums of real numbers termwise. For k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} and a tracial state λ\lambda on Pk\mathcal{P}_{k} we use the norm ∥p∥λ\|p\|_{\lambda} of Noncommutative Laws, Couplings and the Wasserstein Distance: Standing Notation §laws. We also use the pairing βλ(a,b)=λ(ab)\beta_{\lambda}(a,b)=\lambda(ab) on the real vector space Pk,sa\mathcal{P}_{k,\mathrm{sa}}. By Basic Properties of Noncommutative Laws: Adjoints, the Self-Adjoint Pairing, Cauchy-Schwarz, Monotonicity in the Bound, and Laws of Constant Tuples §pairing (for λ\lambda) it is real-valued, symmetric, bilinear and positive semidefinite. For a∈Pk,saa\in\mathcal{P}_{k,\mathrm{sa}} we have a∗=aa^{*}=a, so ∥a∥λ\|a\|_{\lambda} is the seminorm ∥a∥βλ\|a\|_{\beta_{\lambda}} of Cauchy Sequences for a Positive Semidefinite Symmetric Bilinear Form: Cauchy-Schwarz, the Space of Cauchy Sequences, Convergence of Pairings, and Null Sequences. Hence Cauchy Sequences for a Positive Semidefinite Symmetric Bilinear Form: Cauchy-Schwarz, the Space of Cauchy Sequences, Convergence of Pairings, and Null Sequences §cauchy-schwarz, with V=Pk,saV=\mathcal{P}_{k,\mathrm{sa}} and β=βλ\beta=\beta_{\lambda}, together with claim 8 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field (modulus and absolute value agree on R\mathbb{R}), gives for a,b∈Pk,saa,b\in\mathcal{P}_{k,\mathrm{sa}} and real tt:

∣λ(ab)∣≤∥a∥λ∥b∥λ,∥a+b∥λ≤∥a∥λ+∥b∥λ,∥ta∥λ=∣t∣ ∥a∥λ.(S)|\lambda(ab)|\le\|a\|_{\lambda}\|b\|_{\lambda},\qquad\|a+b\|_{\lambda}\le\|a\|_{\lambda}+\|b\|_{\lambda},\qquad\|ta\|_{\lambda}=|t|\,\|a\|_{\lambda}.\tag{S}

We also use three elementary facts.

(E1) If s,t∈Rks,t\in\mathbb{R}^{k} satisfy 0≤sl≤tl0\le s_{l}\le t_{l} for all l∈[k]l\in[k], then ∥s∥≤∥t∥\|s\|\le\|t\| for the Euclidean norm. Indeed, sl2≤tl2s_{l}^{2}\le t_{l}^{2} by claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field, so ∑lsl2≤∑ltl2\sum_{l}s_{l}^{2}\le\sum_{l}t_{l}^{2} by claim 1 of Comparison and Absolute Value Bounds for Finite Sums of Real Numbers, that is, ∥s∥2≤∥t∥2\|s\|^{2}\le\|t\|^{2} by claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n. As both norms are nonnegative, claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field gives ∥s∥≤∥t∥\|s\|\le\|t\|.

(E2) If 0≤α≤α′0\le\alpha\le\alpha' and 0≤β≤β′0\le\beta\le\beta' are real, then αβ≤α′β≤α′β′\alpha\beta\le\alpha'\beta\le\alpha'\beta' by claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. Moreover, for real tt the absolute value ∣t∣|t| is tt or −t-t by claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, so ∣t∣2=t2|t|^{2}=t^{2}.

(P) Let μ,ν∈Σm\mu,\nu\in\Sigma_{m}, say μ∈Σm,R1\mu\in\Sigma_{m,R_{1}} and ν∈Σm,R2\nu\in\Sigma_{m,R_{2}} by Noncommutative Laws of Finitely Many Self-Adjoint Variables with a Norm Bound §law, and put R=R1+R2R=R_{1}+R_{2}, so that R>0R>0 by claim 3 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field applied to 0<R10<R_{1} and 0≤R20\le R_{2}. Then R1,R2≤RR_{1},R_{2}\le R by claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, so μ,ν∈Σm,R\mu,\nu\in\Sigma_{m,R} by Basic Properties of Noncommutative Laws: Adjoints, the Self-Adjoint Pairing, Cauchy-Schwarz, Monotonicity in the Bound, and Laws of Constant Tuples §monotone. By The Noncommutative Wasserstein Distance: Existence of Optimal Couplings, Symmetry, Separation, a Moment Bound, Weak-Star Lower Semicontinuity, and Displacement Interpolation §attained there is an optimal γ∈Π(μ,ν)\gamma\in\Pi(\mu,\nu), that is, I(γ)=W2(μ,ν)2I(\gamma)=W_{2}(\mu,\nu)^{2} by The Noncommutative Quadratic Wasserstein Distance and Optimal Couplings §optimal. Moreover, by The Noncommutative Quadratic Wasserstein Distance and Optimal Couplings §distance and Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root, W2(μ,ν)2W_{2}(\mu,\nu)^{2} is the infimum of the costs of couplings, so W2(μ,ν)2≤I(γ′)W_{2}(\mu,\nu)^{2}\le I(\gamma') for every γ′∈Π(μ,ν)\gamma'\in\Pi(\mu,\nu). This holds for laws of any number of variables.

For k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} write prk1,prk2,Dk\mathrm{pr}^{1}_{k},\mathrm{pr}^{2}_{k},D_{k} for the coordinate data with d=kd=k. By Affine Substitutions of Noncommutative Laws: Self-Adjointness, Composition, Moment Formulas and Positivity, and the Coordinate Data §coordinate, σprkϵ=ιϵ\sigma_{\mathrm{pr}^{\epsilon}_{k}}=\iota^{\epsilon} (ϵ=1,2\epsilon=1,2), and by Affine Substitutions of Noncommutative Laws: Self-Adjointness, Composition, Moment Formulas and Positivity, and the Coordinate Data §cost-identity, γ(Δk)=M(γ∘σDk)\gamma(\Delta_{k})=M(\gamma\circ\sigma_{D_{k}}) for every tracial state γ\gamma on P2k\mathcal{P}_{2k}.

Proof of clause 1 (Affine push-forwards). Let T=(A,c)T=(A,c) and μ,ν∈Σm\mu,\nu\in\Sigma_{m}. Then μ∘σT,ν∘σT∈Σn\mu\circ\sigma_{T},\nu\circ\sigma_{T}\in\Sigma_{n} by Affine Substitutions of Noncommutative Laws: Self-Adjointness, Composition, Moment Formulas and Positivity, and the Coordinate Data §self-adjoint. Let γ∈Π(μ,ν)\gamma\in\Pi(\mu,\nu) be optimal, by (P). Each element of [2n][2n] is either ii or n+in+i for exactly one i∈[n]i\in[n], and likewise for [2m][2m]. Define the affine datum T~=(A~,c~)\tilde T=(\tilde A,\tilde c) from 2m2m to 2n2n variables by A~ij=A~n+i,m+j=Aij\tilde A_{ij}=\tilde A_{n+i,m+j}=A_{ij}, A~i,m+j=A~n+i,j=0\tilde A_{i,m+j}=\tilde A_{n+i,j}=0 and c~i=c~n+i=ci\tilde c_{i}=\tilde c_{n+i}=c_{i} (i∈[n]i\in[n], j∈[m]j\in[m]). Let T0=(A,0)T_{0}=(A,0), an affine datum from mm to nn variables with ∥T0∥=∥T∥\lVert T_{0}\rVert=\lVert T\rVert.

Entries. Let i∈[n]i\in[n] and l∈[2m]l\in[2m]. For ϵ=1,2\epsilon=1,2 let PnϵP^{\epsilon}_{n} denote the matrix of prnϵ\mathrm{pr}^{\epsilon}_{n} and PmϵP^{\epsilon}_{m} the matrix of prmϵ\mathrm{pr}^{\epsilon}_{m}. In each of the following sums at most one summand is nonzero, so claim 7 of Properties of Finite Sums gives

(Pn1A~)il=A~il,(Pn2A~)il=A~n+i,l,(Pn1c~)i=c~i=ci,(Pn2c~)i=c~n+i=ci.(P^{1}_{n}\tilde A)_{il}=\tilde A_{il},\quad(P^{2}_{n}\tilde A)_{il}=\tilde A_{n+i,l},\quad(P^{1}_{n}\tilde c)_{i}=\tilde c_{i}=c_{i},\quad(P^{2}_{n}\tilde c)_{i}=\tilde c_{n+i}=c_{i}.

Similarly, (APm1)il=∑j=1mAij(Pm1)jl(AP^{1}_{m})_{il}=\sum_{j=1}^{m}A_{ij}(P^{1}_{m})_{jl} equals AilA_{il} if l≤ml\le m and 00 if l=m+j′l=m+j' with j′∈[m]j'\in[m]. Likewise (APm2)il(AP^{2}_{m})_{il} equals 00 if l≤ml\le m and Aij′A_{ij'} if l=m+j′l=m+j'. Comparing with the definition of A~\tilde A gives PnϵA~=APmϵP^{\epsilon}_{n}\tilde A=AP^{\epsilon}_{m} for ϵ=1,2\epsilon=1,2.

Composites. By Affine Data and Affine Substitutions of Noncommutative Polynomials §composite, and since ∑jAij⋅0=0\sum_{j}A_{ij}\cdot0=0 and ∑k(Pnϵ)ik⋅0=0\sum_{k}(P^{\epsilon}_{n})_{ik}\cdot0=0, we have prnϵ∘T~=(PnϵA~,Pnϵc~)\mathrm{pr}^{\epsilon}_{n}\circ\tilde T=(P^{\epsilon}_{n}\tilde A,P^{\epsilon}_{n}\tilde c) and T∘prmϵ=(APmϵ,c)T\circ\mathrm{pr}^{\epsilon}_{m}=(AP^{\epsilon}_{m},c). These are equal by the entries above. Likewise Dn∘T~=((Pn1−Pn2)A~,(Pn1−Pn2)c~)D_{n}\circ\tilde T=((P^{1}_{n}-P^{2}_{n})\tilde A,(P^{1}_{n}-P^{2}_{n})\tilde c) and T0∘Dm=(A(Pm1−Pm2),0)T_{0}\circ D_{m}=(A(P^{1}_{m}-P^{2}_{m}),0). By claims 2 and 3 of Properties of Finite Sums, ((Pn1−Pn2)A~)il=(Pn1A~)il−(Pn2A~)il((P^{1}_{n}-P^{2}_{n})\tilde A)_{il}=(P^{1}_{n}\tilde A)_{il}-(P^{2}_{n}\tilde A)_{il}, (A(Pm1−Pm2))il=(APm1)il−(APm2)il(A(P^{1}_{m}-P^{2}_{m}))_{il}=(AP^{1}_{m})_{il}-(AP^{2}_{m})_{il} and ((Pn1−Pn2)c~)i=ci−ci=0((P^{1}_{n}-P^{2}_{n})\tilde c)_{i}=c_{i}-c_{i}=0. Hence Dn∘T~=T0∘DmD_{n}\circ\tilde T=T_{0}\circ D_{m}.

A coupling of the push-forwards. Put γ~=γ∘σT~\tilde\gamma=\gamma\circ\sigma_{\tilde T}, a tracial state on P2n\mathcal{P}_{2n} by Affine Substitutions of Noncommutative Laws: Self-Adjointness, Composition, Moment Formulas and Positivity, and the Coordinate Data §self-adjoint. By Affine Substitutions of Noncommutative Laws: Self-Adjointness, Composition, Moment Formulas and Positivity, and the Coordinate Data §coordinate and Affine Substitutions of Noncommutative Laws: Self-Adjointness, Composition, Moment Formulas and Positivity, and the Coordinate Data §composition, for ϵ=1,2\epsilon=1,2,

γ~∘ιϵ=(γ∘σT~)∘σprnϵ=γ∘σprnϵ∘T~=γ∘σT∘prmϵ=(γ∘σprmϵ)∘σT=(γ∘ιϵ)∘σT.\tilde\gamma\circ\iota^{\epsilon}=(\gamma\circ\sigma_{\tilde T})\circ\sigma_{\mathrm{pr}^{\epsilon}_{n}}=\gamma\circ\sigma_{\mathrm{pr}^{\epsilon}_{n}\circ\tilde T}=\gamma\circ\sigma_{T\circ\mathrm{pr}^{\epsilon}_{m}}=(\gamma\circ\sigma_{\mathrm{pr}^{\epsilon}_{m}})\circ\sigma_{T}=(\gamma\circ\iota^{\epsilon})\circ\sigma_{T}.

Since γ∘ι1=μ\gamma\circ\iota^{1}=\mu and γ∘ι2=ν\gamma\circ\iota^{2}=\nu, we get γ~∈Π(μ∘σT,ν∘σT)\tilde\gamma\in\Pi(\mu\circ\sigma_{T},\nu\circ\sigma_{T}) by Couplings of Two Noncommutative Laws and Their Quadratic Cost §coupling.

Its cost. Put ρ=γ∘σDm\rho=\gamma\circ\sigma_{D_{m}}, a tracial state on Pm\mathcal{P}_{m} by Affine Substitutions of Noncommutative Laws: Self-Adjointness, Composition, Moment Formulas and Positivity, and the Coordinate Data §self-adjoint. By Affine Substitutions of Noncommutative Laws: Self-Adjointness, Composition, Moment Formulas and Positivity, and the Coordinate Data §cost-identity, Affine Substitutions of Noncommutative Laws: Self-Adjointness, Composition, Moment Formulas and Positivity, and the Coordinate Data §composition and Dn∘T~=T0∘DmD_{n}\circ\tilde T=T_{0}\circ D_{m},

I(γ~)=M(γ~∘σDn)=M(γ∘σDn∘T~)=M(γ∘σT0∘Dm)=M(ρ∘σT0),I(γ)=M(ρ).I(\tilde\gamma)=M(\tilde\gamma\circ\sigma_{D_{n}})=M(\gamma\circ\sigma_{D_{n}\circ\tilde T})=M(\gamma\circ\sigma_{T_{0}\circ D_{m}})=M(\rho\circ\sigma_{T_{0}}),\qquad I(\gamma)=M(\rho).

For i∈[n]i\in[n] let bi=aiT0=0⋅1+∑j=1mAijxjb_{i}=a^{T_{0}}_{i}=0\cdot1+\sum_{j=1}^{m}A_{ij}x_{j}. It is self-adjoint by Affine Substitutions of Noncommutative Laws: Self-Adjointness, Composition, Moment Formulas and Positivity, and the Coordinate Data §self-adjoint, and σT0(xixi)=bibi\sigma_{T_{0}}(x_{i}x_{i})=b_{i}b_{i} by Substitution is the Unique Unital Homomorphism with Prescribed Values on the Variables: Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Composition §values and Substitution is the Unique Unital Homomorphism with Prescribed Values on the Variables: Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Composition §homomorphism. Hence I(γ~)=∑i=1n∥bi∥ρ2I(\tilde\gamma)=\sum_{i=1}^{n}\|b_{i}\|_{\rho}^{2} and I(γ)=M(ρ)=∑j=1m∥xj∥ρ2I(\gamma)=M(\rho)=\sum_{j=1}^{m}\|x_{j}\|_{\rho}^{2}.

The estimate. Fix i∈[n]i\in[n]. The partial sums ∑j=1kAijxj\sum_{j=1}^{k}A_{ij}x_{j} are self-adjoint by Noncommutative Polynomials Form a Unital Complex Algebra with Involution: Linear Extension from Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Self-Adjoint Parts §self-adjoint. By induction on k∈[m]k\in[m] along the recursion of claim 1 of both finite-sum lemmas, using (S) and the compatibility of the order with addition, ∥∑j=1kAijxj∥ρ≤∑j=1k∣Aij∣ ∥xj∥ρ\|\sum_{j=1}^{k}A_{ij}x_{j}\|_{\rho}\le\sum_{j=1}^{k}|A_{ij}|\,\|x_{j}\|_{\rho}. Now let α=(∣Ai1∣,…,∣Aim∣)\alpha=(|A_{i1}|,\dots,|A_{im}|) and q=(∥x1∥ρ,…,∥xm∥ρ)q=(\|x_{1}\|_{\rho},\dots,\|x_{m}\|_{\rho}) in Rm\mathbb{R}^{m}. By Difference, Dot Product, and Orthogonality in Rn\mathbb{R}^n, claim 3 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field and Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality for the Euclidean Dot Product,

∥bi∥ρ≤∑j=1m∣Aij∣ ∥xj∥ρ=α⋅q≤∣α⋅q∣≤∥α∥ ∥q∥.\|b_{i}\|_{\rho}\le\sum_{j=1}^{m}|A_{ij}|\,\|x_{j}\|_{\rho}=\alpha\cdot q\le|\alpha\cdot q|\le\|\alpha\|\,\|q\|.

Both ends are nonnegative. So claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field, claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n and (E2) give

∥bi∥ρ2≤∥α∥2∥q∥2=(∑j=1mAij2)M(ρ).\|b_{i}\|_{\rho}^{2}\le\|\alpha\|^{2}\|q\|^{2}=\Bigl(\sum_{j=1}^{m}A_{ij}^{2}\Bigr)M(\rho).

Summing over ii by claim 1 of Comparison and Absolute Value Bounds for Finite Sums of Real Numbers, and using claim 3 of Properties of Finite Sums and Affine Data and Affine Substitutions of Noncommutative Polynomials §norm, we get I(γ~)≤∥T∥2M(ρ)=∥T∥2I(γ)=(∥T∥W2(μ,ν))2I(\tilde\gamma)\le\lVert T\rVert^{2}M(\rho)=\lVert T\rVert^{2}I(\gamma)=\bigl(\lVert T\rVert W_{2}(\mu,\nu)\bigr)^{2}.

Conclusion. By (P) for the laws μ∘σT,ν∘σT∈Σn\mu\circ\sigma_{T},\nu\circ\sigma_{T}\in\Sigma_{n} and the coupling γ~\tilde\gamma, W2(μ∘σT,ν∘σT)2≤I(γ~)≤(∥T∥W2(μ,ν))2W_{2}(\mu\circ\sigma_{T},\nu\circ\sigma_{T})^{2}\le I(\tilde\gamma)\le(\lVert T\rVert W_{2}(\mu,\nu))^{2}. Both W2(μ∘σT,ν∘σT)W_{2}(\mu\circ\sigma_{T},\nu\circ\sigma_{T}) and ∥T∥W2(μ,ν)\lVert T\rVert W_{2}(\mu,\nu) are nonnegative, so claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field gives clause 1.

Proof of clause 2 (Moments). Let μ,ν∈Σm\mu,\nu\in\Sigma_{m}, put W=W2(μ,ν)W=W_{2}(\mu,\nu), let γ∈Π(μ,ν)\gamma\in\Pi(\mu,\nu) be optimal by (P), and write ∥⋅∥=∥⋅∥γ\|\cdot\|=\|\cdot\|_{\gamma}. For i∈[m]i\in[m] put yi=xm+iy_{i}=x_{m+i} and zi=xi−yiz_{i}=x_{i}-y_{i}, self-adjoint by Noncommutative Polynomials Form a Unital Complex Algebra with Involution: Linear Extension from Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Self-Adjoint Parts §self-adjoint. By Couplings of Two Noncommutative Laws and Their Quadratic Cost §marginals, Substitution is the Unique Unital Homomorphism with Prescribed Values on the Variables: Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Composition §values and Substitution is the Unique Unital Homomorphism with Prescribed Values on the Variables: Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Composition §homomorphism, ι1(xi)=xi\iota^{1}(x_{i})=x_{i}, ι2(xi)=yi\iota^{2}(x_{i})=y_{i}, ι1(xixj)=xixj\iota^{1}(x_{i}x_{j})=x_{i}x_{j} and ι2(xixj)=yiyj\iota^{2}(x_{i}x_{j})=y_{i}y_{j}. As γ∘ι1=μ\gamma\circ\iota^{1}=\mu and γ∘ι2=ν\gamma\circ\iota^{2}=\nu (Couplings of Two Noncommutative Laws and Their Quadratic Cost §coupling), for i,j∈[m]i,j\in[m] we get

mi(μ)=γ(xi),mi(ν)=γ(yi),mij(μ)=γ(xixj),mij(ν)=γ(yiyj),M(μ)=∑i=1m∥xi∥2,M(ν)=∑i=1m∥yi∥2.\mathrm{m}_{i}(\mu)=\gamma(x_{i}),\quad\mathrm{m}_{i}(\nu)=\gamma(y_{i}),\quad\mathrm{m}_{ij}(\mu)=\gamma(x_{i}x_{j}),\quad\mathrm{m}_{ij}(\nu)=\gamma(y_{i}y_{j}),\quad M(\mu)=\sum_{i=1}^{m}\|x_{i}\|^{2},\quad M(\nu)=\sum_{i=1}^{m}\|y_{i}\|^{2}.

By Couplings of Two Noncommutative Laws and Their Quadratic Cost §cost and claim 4 of Properties of Finite Sums of Vectors, W2=I(γ)=∑i=1mγ(zizi)=∑i=1m∥zi∥2W^{2}=I(\gamma)=\sum_{i=1}^{m}\gamma(z_{i}z_{i})=\sum_{i=1}^{m}\|z_{i}\|^{2}. Claim 6 of Properties of Finite Sums and claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field then give ∥zi∥≤W\|z_{i}\|\le W, ∥xi∥≤M(μ)1/2\|x_{i}\|\le M(\mu)^{1/2} and ∥yi∥≤M(ν)1/2\|y_{i}\|\le M(\nu)^{1/2} for all i∈[m]i\in[m].

First moments. ∥1∥2=γ(1∗1)=γ(1)=1\|1\|^{2}=\gamma(1^{*}1)=\gamma(1)=1, so ∥1∥=1\|1\|=1. Here 1∗1=11^{*}1=1 because 1∗=11^{*}=1 by Noncommutative Polynomials Form a Unital Complex Algebra with Involution: Linear Extension from Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Self-Adjoint Parts §adjoint and 1⋅1=11\cdot1=1 by Noncommutative Polynomials Form a Unital Complex Algebra with Involution: Linear Extension from Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Self-Adjoint Parts §monomials, and γ(1)=1\gamma(1)=1 by condition (a) of Noncommutative Laws of Finitely Many Self-Adjoint Variables with a Norm Bound §tracial-state. By linearity of γ\gamma and (S) with λ=γ\lambda=\gamma, ∣mi(μ)−mi(ν)∣=∣γ(zi1)∣≤∥zi∥ ∥1∥≤W|\mathrm{m}_{i}(\mu)-\mathrm{m}_{i}(\nu)|=|\gamma(z_{i}1)|\le\|z_{i}\|\,\|1\|\le W.

Second moment. Let u,v,w∈Rmu,v,w\in\mathbb{R}^{m} have entries ui=∥xi∥u_{i}=\|x_{i}\|, vi=∥yi∥v_{i}=\|y_{i}\| and wi=∥zi∥w_{i}=\|z_{i}\|. By claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n and the uniqueness in Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root, ∥u∥=M(μ)1/2\|u\|=M(\mu)^{1/2}, ∥v∥=M(ν)1/2\|v\|=M(\nu)^{1/2} and ∥w∥=W\|w\|=W. Since xi=yi+zix_{i}=y_{i}+z_{i} and yi=xi+(−1)ziy_{i}=x_{i}+(-1)z_{i}, (S) gives ui≤vi+wiu_{i}\le v_{i}+w_{i} and vi≤ui+wiv_{i}\le u_{i}+w_{i}, and these are the entries of v+wv+w and u+wu+w by Sum of Points of Rn\mathbb{R}^n. By (E1) and claim 6 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, ∥u∥≤∥v+w∥≤∥v∥+W\|u\|\le\|v+w\|\le\|v\|+W and ∥v∥≤∥u∥+W\|v\|\le\|u\|+W. Thus −W≤∥u∥−∥v∥≤W-W\le\|u\|-\|v\|\le W by claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and claim 4 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. So ∣M(μ)1/2−M(ν)1/2∣≤W|M(\mu)^{1/2}-M(\nu)^{1/2}|\le W by claim 6 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field.

Quadratic moments. By Noncommutative Polynomials Form a Unital Complex Algebra with Involution: Linear Extension from Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Self-Adjoint Parts §algebra, zixj+yizj=xixj−yixj+yixj−yiyj=xixj−yiyjz_{i}x_{j}+y_{i}z_{j}=x_{i}x_{j}-y_{i}x_{j}+y_{i}x_{j}-y_{i}y_{j}=x_{i}x_{j}-y_{i}y_{j}. So mij(μ)−mij(ν)=γ(zixj)+γ(yizj)\mathrm{m}_{ij}(\mu)-\mathrm{m}_{ij}(\nu)=\gamma(z_{i}x_{j})+\gamma(y_{i}z_{j}), a sum of two real numbers by Basic Properties of Noncommutative Laws: Adjoints, the Self-Adjoint Pairing, Cauchy-Schwarz, Monotonicity in the Bound, and Laws of Constant Tuples §pairing. By claim 5 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, (S) and (E2),

∣mij(μ)−mij(ν)∣≤∥zi∥ ∥xj∥+∥yi∥ ∥zj∥≤W(M(μ)1/2+M(ν)1/2).|\mathrm{m}_{ij}(\mu)-\mathrm{m}_{ij}(\nu)|\le\|z_{i}\|\,\|x_{j}\|+\|y_{i}\|\,\|z_{j}\|\le W\bigl(M(\mu)^{1/2}+M(\nu)^{1/2}\bigr).

Proof of clause 3 (Cauchy sequences). By The Noncommutative Wasserstein Distance Satisfies the Triangle Inequality and is a Metric on Noncommutative Laws §metric, W2W_{2} is the metric of Σm\Sigma_{m} and of Σn\Sigma_{n}, and Cauchy Sequence in a Metric Space applies. Let ε>0\varepsilon>0 be real.

Push-forwards. We have λk∘σT∈Σn\lambda_{k}\circ\sigma_{T}\in\Sigma_{n} by Affine Substitutions of Noncommutative Laws: Self-Adjointness, Composition, Moment Formulas and Positivity, and the Coordinate Data §self-adjoint. The number ∥T∥+1\lVert T\rVert+1 is positive by claims 6 and 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. Choose NN with W2(λk,λl)<ε(∥T∥+1)−1W_{2}(\lambda_{k},\lambda_{l})<\varepsilon(\lVert T\rVert+1)^{-1} for k,l≥Nk,l\ge N. Then clause 1, claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and claim 10 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field give W2(λk∘σT,λl∘σT)≤∥T∥W2(λk,λl)≤(∥T∥+1)W2(λk,λl)<εW_{2}(\lambda_{k}\circ\sigma_{T},\lambda_{l}\circ\sigma_{T})\le\lVert T\rVert W_{2}(\lambda_{k},\lambda_{l})\le(\lVert T\rVert+1)W_{2}(\lambda_{k},\lambda_{l})<\varepsilon.

First moments. Choose NN with W2(λk,λl)<εW_{2}(\lambda_{k},\lambda_{l})<\varepsilon for k,l≥Nk,l\ge N. By clause 2, ∣mi(λk)−mi(λl)∣<ε|\mathrm{m}_{i}(\lambda_{k})-\mathrm{m}_{i}(\lambda_{l})|<\varepsilon for k,l≥Nk,l\ge N, so (mi(λk))k(\mathrm{m}_{i}(\lambda_{k}))_{k} is Cauchy in the sense of Cauchy Sequence of Real Numbers.

Quadratic moments. Choose N0N_{0} with W2(λk,λl)<1W_{2}(\lambda_{k},\lambda_{l})<1 for k,l≥N0k,l\ge N_{0}, and put B=M(λN0)1/2+1B=M(\lambda_{N_{0}})^{1/2}+1, so that B≥1>0B\ge1>0. For k≥N0k\ge N_{0}, clause 2 and claim 3 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field give M(λk)1/2≤M(λN0)1/2+W2(λk,λN0)≤BM(\lambda_{k})^{1/2}\le M(\lambda_{N_{0}})^{1/2}+W_{2}(\lambda_{k},\lambda_{N_{0}})\le B. Hence, for k,l≥N0k,l\ge N_{0}, clause 2 and claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field give ∣mij(λk)−mij(λl)∣≤2B W2(λk,λl)|\mathrm{m}_{ij}(\lambda_{k})-\mathrm{m}_{ij}(\lambda_{l})|\le2B\,W_{2}(\lambda_{k},\lambda_{l}). By claims 5, 7 and 10 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, δ=ε(2B)−1>0\delta=\varepsilon(2B)^{-1}>0. Choose N1N_{1} with W2(λk,λl)<δW_{2}(\lambda_{k},\lambda_{l})<\delta for k,l≥N1k,l\ge N_{1}, and let NN be the larger of N0N_{0} and N1N_{1}. For k,l≥Nk,l\ge N we get ∣mij(λk)−mij(λl)∣≤2B W2(λk,λl)<2Bδ=ε|\mathrm{m}_{ij}(\lambda_{k})-\mathrm{m}_{ij}(\lambda_{l})|\le2B\,W_{2}(\lambda_{k},\lambda_{l})<2B\delta=\varepsilon, so (mij(λk))k(\mathrm{m}_{ij}(\lambda_{k}))_{k} is Cauchy by Cauchy Sequence of Real Numbers.

Proof of clause 4 (Cost). By Affine Substitutions of Noncommutative Laws: Self-Adjointness, Composition, Moment Formulas and Positivity, and the Coordinate Data §coordinate, γ∘ιϵ=γ∘σprdϵ\gamma\circ\iota^{\epsilon}=\gamma\circ\sigma_{\mathrm{pr}^{\epsilon}_{d}} for ϵ=1,2\epsilon=1,2. This lies in Σd\Sigma_{d} by Affine Substitutions of Noncommutative Laws: Self-Adjointness, Composition, Moment Formulas and Positivity, and the Coordinate Data §self-adjoint, applied to the affine datum prdϵ\mathrm{pr}^{\epsilon}_{d} from 2d2d to dd variables and the law γ∈Σ2d\gamma\in\Sigma_{2d}. Since γ\gamma is a tracial state on P2d\mathcal{P}_{2d} whose marginals γ∘ι1\gamma\circ\iota^{1} and γ∘ι2\gamma\circ\iota^{2} are the given laws, γ∈Π(γ∘ι1,γ∘ι2)\gamma\in\Pi(\gamma\circ\iota^{1},\gamma\circ\iota^{2}) by Couplings of Two Noncommutative Laws and Their Quadratic Cost §coupling. Then (P), with dd in place of mm, gives W2(γ∘ι1,γ∘ι2)2≤I(γ)W_{2}(\gamma\circ\iota^{1},\gamma\circ\iota^{2})^{2}\le I(\gamma).

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Comments

Loading…