TheoremBase

Proves the coset equality criterion from closure of H, derives cover and disjointness from it, uses left cancellation for the bijection onto gH and counting under injective images, and identifies cosets with equivalence classes.

Proof

Throughout, the operation of GG is associative with neutral element ee (Groups and Abelian Groups (i), Monoids (i)), the subgroup HH contains ee and is closed under products and inverses (Subgroups (i)), and left cosets are as in Cosets and the Index of a Subgroup (i); routine facts about inclusions, disjoint classes and the relation of lying in a common left coset are used without comment (Toolkit for AL1).

We first prove (ii). Suppose gH=kHgH=kH. Then k=ke∈kH=gHk=ke\in kH=gH, so k=gh0k=gh_{0} for some h0∈Hh_{0}\in H, and gβˆ’1k=h0∈Hg^{-1}k=h_{0}\in H. Conversely, suppose gβˆ’1k=h0∈Hg^{-1}k=h_{0}\in H. Then k=gh0k=gh_{0} and g=kh0βˆ’1g=kh_{0}^{-1}, so for every h∈Hh\in H

kh=g(h0h)∈gHandgh=k(h0βˆ’1h)∈kH.kh=g(h_{0}h)\in gH\qquad\text{and}\qquad gh=k(h_{0}^{-1}h)\in kH.

Hence kHβŠ†gHkH\subseteq gH and gHβŠ†kHgH\subseteq kH, that is, gH=kHgH=kH.

For (i), note first that g=ge∈gHg=ge\in gH for every g∈Gg\in G. Now let gHgH and kHkH be two left cosets that are not disjoint, and choose x∈gH∩kHx\in gH\cap kH, say x=gh1=kh2x=gh_{1}=kh_{2} with h1,h2∈Hh_{1},h_{2}\in H. Then gβˆ’1k=h1h2βˆ’1∈Hg^{-1}k=h_{1}h_{2}^{-1}\in H, so gH=kHgH=kH by (ii). Thus any two left cosets are equal or disjoint.

For (iii), fix g∈Gg\in G and consider the function Ξ»:Hβ†’gH\lambda:H\to gH, Ξ»(h)=gh\lambda(h)=gh. It is surjective by the definition of gHgH, and it is injective, because gh=ghβ€²gh=gh' gives

h=gβˆ’1(gh)=gβˆ’1(ghβ€²)=hβ€².h=g^{-1}(gh)=g^{-1}(gh')=h'.

So Ξ»\lambda is a bijection from HH onto gHgH (Injective, Surjective and Bijective Functions between Classes (iii)). If HH is finite, then gH=Ξ»(H)gH=\lambda(H) is finite by Finite Sets: the Pigeonhole Principle, Uniqueness of the Length, Subsets, Unions, Products, Images, Bounded Sets of Natural Numbers, Extreme Elements, Sets of Maps, Finite Unions and Finite Choice (vi), and Counting: Intervals, Empty Sets and Singletons, Injective Images, Subsets, Unions and Products (iii), applied to Ξ»\lambda regarded as a function into GG, gives #(gH)=#H\#(gH)=\#H.

Finally we prove (iv). The relation ∼\sim is reflexive, since gβˆ’1g=e∈Hg^{-1}g=e\in H. It is symmetric: if gβˆ’1k∈Hg^{-1}k\in H, then by Cancellation Laws and Basic Inverse Identities in a Group (iv) and Cancellation Laws and Basic Inverse Identities in a Group (iii)

(gβˆ’1k)βˆ’1=kβˆ’1g,(g^{-1}k)^{-1}=k^{-1}g,

and this lies in HH, being the inverse of an element of HH (Subgroups (i)). It is transitive: if gβˆ’1k∈Hg^{-1}k\in H and kβˆ’1l∈Hk^{-1}l\in H, then gβˆ’1l=(gβˆ’1k)(kβˆ’1l)∈Hg^{-1}l=(g^{-1}k)(k^{-1}l)\in H. So ∼\sim is an equivalence relation on GG (Equivalence Relations on a Set (i), with Reflexive, Symmetric, Antisymmetric and Transitive Relations on a Set (i), Reflexive, Symmetric, Antisymmetric and Transitive Relations on a Set (ii) and Reflexive, Symmetric, Antisymmetric and Transitive Relations on a Set (iv)). For g,k∈Gg,k\in G, the element kk lies in the equivalence class of gg (The Equivalence Class of an Element under an Equivalence Relation (i)) if and only if gβˆ’1k∈Hg^{-1}k\in H, that is, k=ghk=gh for some h∈Hh\in H, that is, k∈gHk\in gH; so the class of gg is gHgH. Hence the quotient of GG by ∼\sim (The Quotient of a Set by an Equivalence Relation and the Canonical Projection (i)) is

{[g]∼:g∈G}={gH:g∈G}=G/H\{[g]_{\sim}: g\in G\}=\{gH: g\in G\}=G/H

by Cosets and the Index of a Subgroup (iii).

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…