Proves the coset equality criterion from closure of H, derives cover and disjointness from it, uses left cancellation for the bijection onto gH and counting under injective images, and identifies cosets with equivalence classes.
Throughout, the operation of is associative with neutral element (Groups and Abelian Groups (i), Monoids (i)), the subgroup contains and is closed under products and inverses (Subgroups (i)), and left cosets are as in Cosets and the Index of a Subgroup (i); routine facts about inclusions, disjoint classes and the relation of lying in a common left coset are used without comment (Toolkit for AL1).
We first prove (ii). Suppose . Then , so for some , and . Conversely, suppose . Then and , so for every
Hence and , that is, .
For (i), note first that for every . Now let and be two left cosets that are not disjoint, and choose , say with . Then , so by (ii). Thus any two left cosets are equal or disjoint.
For (iii), fix and consider the function , . It is surjective by the definition of , and it is injective, because gives
So is a bijection from onto (Injective, Surjective and Bijective Functions between Classes (iii)). If is finite, then is finite by Finite Sets: the Pigeonhole Principle, Uniqueness of the Length, Subsets, Unions, Products, Images, Bounded Sets of Natural Numbers, Extreme Elements, Sets of Maps, Finite Unions and Finite Choice (vi), and Counting: Intervals, Empty Sets and Singletons, Injective Images, Subsets, Unions and Products (iii), applied to regarded as a function into , gives .
Finally we prove (iv). The relation is reflexive, since . It is symmetric: if , then by Cancellation Laws and Basic Inverse Identities in a Group (iv) and Cancellation Laws and Basic Inverse Identities in a Group (iii)
and this lies in , being the inverse of an element of (Subgroups (i)). It is transitive: if and , then . So is an equivalence relation on (Equivalence Relations on a Set (i), with Reflexive, Symmetric, Antisymmetric and Transitive Relations on a Set (i), Reflexive, Symmetric, Antisymmetric and Transitive Relations on a Set (ii) and Reflexive, Symmetric, Antisymmetric and Transitive Relations on a Set (iv)). For , the element lies in the equivalence class of (The Equivalence Class of an Element under an Equivalence Relation (i)) if and only if , that is, for some , that is, ; so the class of is . Hence the quotient of by (The Quotient of a Set by an Equivalence Relation and the Canonical Projection (i)) is
Loadingβ¦