TheoremBase

Every claim follows from the single inequality between the two metrics: a radius that works for the gauge is reached from the Wasserstein distance by shrinking it by the factor 1+C_rho, which avoids dividing by a constant that is only assumed nonnegative.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement and is applied here to the data named in the statement of the lemma. The real line carries the metric dRd_{\mathbb{R}} with dR(s,t)=∣s−t∣d_{\mathbb{R}}(s,t)=|s-t| of The Absolute Value Metric on the Real Numbers.

A comparison of radii. Since 0≤Cρ0\le C_{\rho} and 0<10<1 (claim 6 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field), the compatibility of the order with addition (an axiom of Ordered Field) gives 1≤1+Cρ1\le1+C_{\rho}, so 1+Cρ1+C_{\rho} is positive by mixed transitivity (claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field) and its inverse (1+Cρ)−1(1+C_{\rho})^{-1} is positive by claim 7 of that lemma. Strict compatibility of the order with addition (claim 1 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field), applied to 0<10<1, gives Cρ<1+CρC_{\rho}<1+C_{\rho}, and multiplying by the positive (1+Cρ)−1(1+C_{\rho})^{-1} (claim 10 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field) yields

Cρ (1+Cρ)−1<1.C_{\rho}\,(1+C_{\rho})^{-1}<1 .

Let r∈Rr\in\mathbb{R} be positive and put r′=r (1+Cρ)−1r'=r\,(1+C_{\rho})^{-1}, which is positive by claim 5 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. Let σ,τ∈P2(Rd)\sigma,\tau\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) satisfy W2(σ,τ)<r′W_{2}(\sigma,\tau)<r'. Multiplying W2(σ,τ)≤r′W_{2}(\sigma,\tau)\le r' by the nonnegative CρC_{\rho} (claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field) gives CρW2(σ,τ)≤Cρr′C_{\rho}W_{2}(\sigma,\tau)\le C_{\rho}r', while multiplying the displayed inequality by the positive rr (claim 10 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field) gives Cρr′=r Cρ(1+Cρ)−1<rC_{\rho}r'=r\,C_{\rho}(1+C_{\rho})^{-1}<r, the identification of the two products being the commutativity and associativity of multiplication (axioms of Field). With the hypothesis ρ(σ,τ)≤CρW2(σ,τ)\rho(\sigma,\tau)\le C_{\rho}W_{2}(\sigma,\tau) and the transitivity of ≤\le (Total Order on a Set) we obtain ρ(σ,τ)≤Cρr′\rho(\sigma,\tau)\le C_{\rho}r', and then ρ(σ,τ)<r\rho(\sigma,\tau)<r by mixed transitivity. We record this as

(∗)W2(σ,τ)<r (1+Cρ)−1 ⟹ ρ(σ,τ)<r(σ,τ∈P2(Rd), r positive),(\ast)\qquad W_{2}(\sigma,\tau)<r\,(1+C_{\rho})^{-1}\ \Longrightarrow\ \rho(\sigma,\tau)<r\qquad\bigl(\sigma,\tau\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}),\ r\text{ positive}\bigr),

together with the positivity of r(1+Cρ)−1r(1+C_{\rho})^{-1}.

Claim 1. Let ε∈R\varepsilon\in\mathbb{R} be positive. Since ff is continuous at μ\mu relative to AA in (P2(Rd),ρ)(\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}),\rho), Continuous Map Between Metric Spaces provides a positive r∈Rr\in\mathbb{R} such that every σ∈A\sigma\in A with ρ(μ,σ)<r\rho(\mu,\sigma)<r satisfies dR(f(σ),f(μ))<εd_{\mathbb{R}}(f(\sigma),f(\mu))<\varepsilon. By (∗)(\ast), every σ∈A\sigma\in A with W2(μ,σ)<r(1+Cρ)−1W_{2}(\mu,\sigma)<r(1+C_{\rho})^{-1} satisfies ρ(μ,σ)<r\rho(\mu,\sigma)<r and hence dR(f(σ),f(μ))<εd_{\mathbb{R}}(f(\sigma),f(\mu))<\varepsilon. As r(1+Cρ)−1r(1+C_{\rho})^{-1} is positive and ε\varepsilon was arbitrary, ff is continuous at μ\mu relative to AA in (P2(Rd),W2)(\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}),W_{2}), again by Continuous Map Between Metric Spaces.

Claim 2. Let μ∈A\mu\in A and let ε∈R\varepsilon\in\mathbb{R} be positive. Since ff is upper semicontinuous at μ\mu relative to AA in (P2(Rd),ρ)(\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}),\rho), Upper Semicontinuous Function on a Subset of a Metric Space provides a positive r∈Rr\in\mathbb{R} such that every σ∈A\sigma\in A with ρ(μ,σ)<r\rho(\mu,\sigma)<r satisfies f(σ)<f(μ)+εf(\sigma)<f(\mu)+\varepsilon. By (∗)(\ast) the same conclusion holds for every σ∈A\sigma\in A with W2(μ,σ)<r(1+Cρ)−1W_{2}(\mu,\sigma)<r(1+C_{\rho})^{-1}, so ff is upper semicontinuous at μ\mu relative to AA in (P2(Rd),W2)(\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}),W_{2}). As μ∈A\mu\in A was arbitrary, claim 2 follows.

Claim 3. Identical to claim 2, with Lower Semicontinuous Function on a Subset of a Metric Space in place of Upper Semicontinuous Function on a Subset of a Metric Space and the conclusion f(μ)−ε<f(σ)f(\mu)-\varepsilon<f(\sigma) in place of f(σ)<f(μ)+εf(\sigma)<f(\mu)+\varepsilon.

Claim 4. Let μ,ν∈A\mu,\nu\in A. Multiplying ρ(μ,ν)≤CρW2(μ,ν)\rho(\mu,\nu)\le C_{\rho}W_{2}(\mu,\nu) by the nonnegative LL (claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field) gives

L ρ(μ,ν)≤L CρW2(μ,ν)=CρL W2(μ,ν),L\,\rho(\mu,\nu)\le L\,C_{\rho}W_{2}(\mu,\nu)=C_{\rho}L\,W_{2}(\mu,\nu),

the last identity by the commutativity and associativity of multiplication. Combining with the hypothesis ∣f(μ)−f(ν)∣≤Lρ(μ,ν)|f(\mu)-f(\nu)|\le L\rho(\mu,\nu) and the transitivity of ≤\le (Total Order on a Set) gives ∣f(μ)−f(ν)∣≤CρL W2(μ,ν)|f(\mu)-f(\nu)|\le C_{\rho}L\,W_{2}(\mu,\nu), which is claim 4.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…