Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.
Preliminaries. Write σ = σ Γ t : P d → P 2 d \sigma=\sigma_{\Gamma_{t}}:\mathcal{P}_{d}\to\mathcal{P}_{2d} σ = σ Γ t : P d → P 2 d ; by Affine Data and Affine Substitutions of Noncommutative Polynomials §substitution it is the substitution σ a \sigma_{a} σ a of the tuple a = ( x 1 + t x d + 1 , … , x d + t x 2 d ) a=(x_{1}+\sqrt{t}\,x_{d+1},\dots,x_{d}+\sqrt{t}\,x_{2d}) a = ( x 1 + t x d + 1 , … , x d + t x 2 d ) of Γ t \Gamma_{t} Γ t (The Free Heat Flow: Realisation, Norm Bound, Moments, Distance to the Initial Law, Wasserstein Contraction, Semigroup Property and Continuity §datum ). Thus V V V is the operator of Marginals of a Noncommutative Law: the Isometry of GNS Spaces, the Trace-Preserving Embedding of Tracial Algebras and the Conditional Expectation §isometry for γ \gamma γ and this a a a : V p ^ μ = σ ( p ) ^ γ V\widehat{p}^{\,\mu}=\widehat{\sigma(p)}^{\,\gamma} V p μ = σ ( p ) γ for every p ∈ P d p\in\mathcal{P}_{d} p ∈ P d , and V ∗ V = I V^{*}V=I V ∗ V = I . Its adjoint V ∗ V^{*} V ∗ satisfies ⟨ V ∗ ζ , η ⟩ H μ = ⟨ ζ , V η ⟩ H γ \langle V^{*}\zeta,\eta\rangle_{\mathcal{H}_{\mu}}=\langle\zeta,V\eta\rangle_{\mathcal{H}_{\gamma}} ⟨ V ∗ ζ , η ⟩ H μ = ⟨ ζ , V η ⟩ H γ for ζ ∈ H γ \zeta\in\mathcal{H}_{\gamma} ζ ∈ H γ and η ∈ H μ \eta\in\mathcal{H}_{\mu} η ∈ H μ , and inner products are linear in the second and conjugate-linear in the first argument (Complex Hilbert Spaces and Bounded Linear Maps: Standing Notation §spaces ). Since γ ∈ Σ 2 d \gamma\in\Sigma_{2d} γ ∈ Σ 2 d , there is a real r > 0 r>0 r > 0 with γ ∈ Σ 2 d , r \gamma\in\Sigma_{2d,r} γ ∈ Σ 2 d , r (Noncommutative Laws of Finitely Many Self-Adjoint Variables with a Norm Bound §law ), so Left and Right Multiplication Operators on the Complex GNS Space of a Noncommutative Law: Boundedness, Algebra Rules, Adjoints, Commutation, the Vacuum and the Conjugation §vacuum gives ⟨ p ^ γ , q ^ γ ⟩ H γ = γ ( p ∗ q ) \langle\widehat{p}^{\,\gamma},\widehat{q}^{\,\gamma}\rangle_{\mathcal{H}_{\gamma}}=\gamma(p^{*}q) ⟨ p γ , q γ ⟩ H γ = γ ( p ∗ q ) for p , q ∈ P 2 d p,q\in\mathcal{P}_{2d} p , q ∈ P 2 d . As t > 0 t>0 t > 0 , t \sqrt{t} t is a real number with t ≥ 0 \sqrt{t}\ge0 t ≥ 0 and t t = t ≠ 0 \sqrt{t}\sqrt{t}=t\neq0 t t = t = 0 , so t > 0 \sqrt{t}>0 t > 0 and 1 / t 1/\sqrt{t} 1/ t is a positive real number.
The Schwinger-Dyson equation for γ \gamma γ . By The Free Product of Two Noncommutative Laws: Existence, Uniqueness, Norm Bound, Substitutions and Weak-Star Continuity §product , γ = λ ⋆ s c d \gamma=\lambda\star\mathrm{sc}_{d} γ = λ ⋆ sc d satisfies γ ∘ ι 1 = λ \gamma\circ\iota^{1}=\lambda γ ∘ ι 1 = λ . Hence Free Semicircular Variables are Characterised by the Schwinger-Dyson Equation Relative to the Other Variables; Semicircular Systems and Rotations §characterisation , applied with m = n = d m=n=d m = n = d and α = λ \alpha=\lambda α = λ , shows that γ \gamma γ satisfies the Schwinger-Dyson equation in the last d d d variables :
γ ( x d + j q ) = ∂ d + j γ ( q ) ( j ∈ [ d ] , q ∈ P 2 d ) , \gamma(x_{d+j}q)=\partial^{\gamma}_{d+j}(q)\qquad(j\in[d],\ q\in\mathcal{P}_{2d}), γ ( x d + j q ) = ∂ d + j γ ( q ) ( j ∈ [ d ] , q ∈ P 2 d ) ,
where ∂ d + j γ \partial^{\gamma}_{d+j} ∂ d + j γ is the free difference quotient of γ \gamma γ .
Clause 1. Fix j ∈ [ d ] j\in[d] j ∈ [ d ] and put ζ j = x d + j ^ γ ∈ H γ \zeta_{j}=\widehat{x_{d+j}}^{\,\gamma}\in\mathcal{H}_{\gamma} ζ j = x d + j γ ∈ H γ and ξ μ , j = 1 t V ∗ ζ j ∈ H μ \xi_{\mu,j}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{t}}V^{*}\zeta_{j}\in\mathcal{H}_{\mu} ξ μ , j = t 1 V ∗ ζ j ∈ H μ . Let p ∈ P d p\in\mathcal{P}_{d} p ∈ P d . Because 1 / t 1/\sqrt{t} 1/ t is real, the inner product is conjugate-linear in its first argument, and by the defining property of V ∗ V^{*} V ∗ and of V V V ,
⟨ ξ μ , j , p ^ μ ⟩ H μ = 1 t ⟨ V ∗ ζ j , p ^ μ ⟩ H μ = 1 t ⟨ x d + j ^ γ , σ ( p ) ^ γ ⟩ H γ = 1 t γ ( x d + j ∗ σ ( p ) ) = 1 t γ ( x d + j σ ( p ) ) , \langle\xi_{\mu,j},\widehat{p}^{\,\mu}\rangle_{\mathcal{H}_{\mu}}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{t}}\langle V^{*}\zeta_{j},\widehat{p}^{\,\mu}\rangle_{\mathcal{H}_{\mu}}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{t}}\langle\widehat{x_{d+j}}^{\,\gamma},\widehat{\sigma(p)}^{\,\gamma}\rangle_{\mathcal{H}_{\gamma}}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{t}}\,\gamma\bigl(x_{d+j}^{*}\,\sigma(p)\bigr)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{t}}\,\gamma\bigl(x_{d+j}\,\sigma(p)\bigr), ⟨ ξ μ , j , p μ ⟩ H μ = t 1 ⟨ V ∗ ζ j , p μ ⟩ H μ = t 1 ⟨ x d + j γ , σ ( p ) γ ⟩ H γ = t 1 γ ( x d + j ∗ σ ( p ) ) = t 1 γ ( x d + j σ ( p ) ) ,
using the formula from Left and Right Multiplication Operators on the Complex GNS Space of a Noncommutative Law: Boundedness, Algebra Rules, Adjoints, Commutation, the Vacuum and the Conjugation §vacuum and x d + j ∗ = x d + j x_{d+j}^{*}=x_{d+j} x d + j ∗ = x d + j (Noncommutative Polynomials Form a Unital Complex Algebra with Involution: Linear Extension from Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Self-Adjoint Parts §adjoint ). By the Schwinger-Dyson equation for γ \gamma γ above, this equals 1 t ∂ d + j γ ( σ ( p ) ) \frac{1}{\sqrt{t}}\,\partial^{\gamma}_{d+j}(\sigma(p)) t 1 ∂ d + j γ ( σ ( p )) . Now μ = γ ∘ σ Γ t \mu=\gamma\circ\sigma_{\Gamma_{t}} μ = γ ∘ σ Γ t by The Free Heat Flow: Realisation, Norm Bound, Moments, Distance to the Initial Law, Wasserstein Contraction, Semigroup Property and Continuity §realisation , so the chain rule , applied to the affine datum Γ t = ( A t , 0 ) \Gamma_{t}=(A^{t},0) Γ t = ( A t , 0 ) from 2 d 2d 2 d to d d d variables and to γ \gamma γ , gives
∂ d + j γ ( σ ( p ) ) = ∑ i = 1 d A i , d + j t ∂ i μ ( p ) = t ∂ j μ ( p ) , \partial^{\gamma}_{d+j}(\sigma(p))=\sum_{i=1}^{d}A^{t}_{i,d+j}\,\partial^{\mu}_{i}(p)=\sqrt{t}\,\partial^{\mu}_{j}(p), ∂ d + j γ ( σ ( p )) = i = 1 ∑ d A i , d + j t ∂ i μ ( p ) = t ∂ j μ ( p ) ,
because, by The Free Heat Flow: Realisation, Norm Bound, Moments, Distance to the Initial Law, Wasserstein Contraction, Semigroup Property and Continuity §datum , A j , d + j t = t A^{t}_{j,d+j}=\sqrt{t} A j , d + j t = t , while for i ∈ [ d ] i\in[d] i ∈ [ d ] with i ≠ j i\neq j i = j the column index d + j d+j d + j differs both from i i i (as d + j > d ≥ i d+j>d\ge i d + j > d ≥ i ) and from d + i d+i d + i , so A i , d + j t = 0 A^{t}_{i,d+j}=0 A i , d + j t = 0 . Consequently ⟨ ξ μ , j , p ^ μ ⟩ H μ = 1 t t ∂ j μ ( p ) = ∂ j μ ( p ) \langle\xi_{\mu,j},\widehat{p}^{\,\mu}\rangle_{\mathcal{H}_{\mu}}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{t}}\sqrt{t}\,\partial^{\mu}_{j}(p)=\partial^{\mu}_{j}(p) ⟨ ξ μ , j , p μ ⟩ H μ = t 1 t ∂ j μ ( p ) = ∂ j μ ( p ) for every j ∈ [ d ] j\in[d] j ∈ [ d ] and p ∈ P d p\in\mathcal{P}_{d} p ∈ P d . By The Free Difference Quotient and the Conjugate Variables of a Noncommutative Law §conjugate , μ \mu μ has conjugate variables, and by the uniqueness stated there they are ξ μ = ( ξ μ , 1 , … , ξ μ , d ) \xi_{\mu}=(\xi_{\mu,1},\dots,\xi_{\mu,d}) ξ μ = ( ξ μ , 1 , … , ξ μ , d ) with ξ μ , j = 1 t V ∗ x d + j ^ γ \xi_{\mu,j}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{t}}V^{*}\widehat{x_{d+j}}^{\,\gamma} ξ μ , j = t 1 V ∗ x d + j γ .
Clause 2. V ∗ V^{*} V ∗ does not increase norms. For η ∈ H μ \eta\in\mathcal{H}_{\mu} η ∈ H μ , the defining property of V ∗ V^{*} V ∗ and V ∗ V = I V^{*}V=I V ∗ V = I give ∥ V η ∥ 2 = ⟨ V η , V η ⟩ H γ = ⟨ V ∗ V η , η ⟩ H μ = ∥ η ∥ 2 \lVert V\eta\rVert^{2}=\langle V\eta,V\eta\rangle_{\mathcal{H}_{\gamma}}=\langle V^{*}V\eta,\eta\rangle_{\mathcal{H}_{\mu}}=\lVert\eta\rVert^{2} ∥ V η ∥ 2 = ⟨ V η , V η ⟩ H γ = ⟨ V ∗ V η , η ⟩ H μ = ∥ η ∥ 2 , so ∥ V η ∥ = ∥ η ∥ \lVert V\eta\rVert=\lVert\eta\rVert ∥ V η ∥ = ∥ η ∥ . Let ζ ∈ H γ \zeta\in\mathcal{H}_{\gamma} ζ ∈ H γ . Then ∥ V ∗ ζ ∥ 2 = ⟨ V ∗ ζ , V ∗ ζ ⟩ H μ = ⟨ ζ , V V ∗ ζ ⟩ H γ \lVert V^{*}\zeta\rVert^{2}=\langle V^{*}\zeta,V^{*}\zeta\rangle_{\mathcal{H}_{\mu}}=\langle\zeta,VV^{*}\zeta\rangle_{\mathcal{H}_{\gamma}} ∥ V ∗ ζ ∥ 2 = ⟨ V ∗ ζ , V ∗ ζ ⟩ H μ = ⟨ ζ , V V ∗ ζ ⟩ H γ , a nonnegative real number, and the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality (taking nonnegative square roots) gives
∥ V ∗ ζ ∥ 2 = ∣ ⟨ ζ , V V ∗ ζ ⟩ H γ ∣ ≤ ∥ ζ ∥ ∥ V V ∗ ζ ∥ = ∥ ζ ∥ ∥ V ∗ ζ ∥ . \lVert V^{*}\zeta\rVert^{2}=\bigl|\langle\zeta,VV^{*}\zeta\rangle_{\mathcal{H}_{\gamma}}\bigr|\le\lVert\zeta\rVert\,\lVert VV^{*}\zeta\rVert=\lVert\zeta\rVert\,\lVert V^{*}\zeta\rVert . ∥ V ∗ ζ ∥ 2 = ⟨ ζ , V V ∗ ζ ⟩ H γ ≤ ∥ ζ ∥ ∥ V V ∗ ζ ∥ = ∥ ζ ∥ ∥ V ∗ ζ ∥ .
If ∥ V ∗ ζ ∥ = 0 \lVert V^{*}\zeta\rVert=0 ∥ V ∗ ζ ∥ = 0 then ∥ V ∗ ζ ∥ ≤ ∥ ζ ∥ \lVert V^{*}\zeta\rVert\le\lVert\zeta\rVert ∥ V ∗ ζ ∥ ≤ ∥ ζ ∥ trivially; otherwise dividing by ∥ V ∗ ζ ∥ > 0 \lVert V^{*}\zeta\rVert>0 ∥ V ∗ ζ ∥ > 0 gives the same inequality.
The norm of ζ j \zeta_{j} ζ j . For j ∈ [ d ] j\in[d] j ∈ [ d ] , by Left and Right Multiplication Operators on the Complex GNS Space of a Noncommutative Law: Boundedness, Algebra Rules, Adjoints, Commutation, the Vacuum and the Conjugation §vacuum , Noncommutative Polynomials Form a Unital Complex Algebra with Involution: Linear Extension from Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Self-Adjoint Parts §adjoint and the Schwinger-Dyson equation for γ \gamma γ with q = x d + j q=x_{d+j} q = x d + j ,
∥ ζ j ∥ 2 = γ ( x d + j ∗ x d + j ) = γ ( x d + j x d + j ) = ∂ d + j γ ( x d + j ) = γ ( x ∅ ) γ ( x ∅ ) = 1 , \lVert\zeta_{j}\rVert^{2}=\gamma(x_{d+j}^{*}x_{d+j})=\gamma(x_{d+j}x_{d+j})=\partial^{\gamma}_{d+j}(x_{d+j})=\gamma(x_{\varnothing})\,\gamma(x_{\varnothing})=1, ∥ ζ j ∥ 2 = γ ( x d + j ∗ x d + j ) = γ ( x d + j x d + j ) = ∂ d + j γ ( x d + j ) = γ ( x ∅ ) γ ( x ∅ ) = 1 ,
where the fourth equality is the defining formula of The Free Difference Quotient and the Conjugate Variables of a Noncommutative Law §difference-quotient for the word ( d + j ) (d+j) ( d + j ) of length 1 1 1 , and the last uses x ∅ = 1 x_{\varnothing}=1 x ∅ = 1 (The Algebra of Noncommutative Polynomials in Finitely Many Self-Adjoint Variables §monomials ) and γ ( 1 ) = 1 \gamma(1)=1 γ ( 1 ) = 1 ((a) of Noncommutative Laws of Finitely Many Self-Adjoint Variables with a Norm Bound §tracial-state ).
The bound. For j ∈ [ d ] j\in[d] j ∈ [ d ] , since 1 / t 1/\sqrt{t} 1/ t is real, sesquilinearity of the inner product gives ∥ ξ μ , j ∥ 2 = 1 t ∥ V ∗ ζ j ∥ 2 ≤ 1 t ∥ ζ j ∥ 2 = 1 t \lVert\xi_{\mu,j}\rVert^{2}=\frac{1}{t}\lVert V^{*}\zeta_{j}\rVert^{2}\le\frac{1}{t}\lVert\zeta_{j}\rVert^{2}=\frac{1}{t} ∥ ξ μ , j ∥ 2 = t 1 ∥ V ∗ ζ j ∥ 2 ≤ t 1 ∥ ζ j ∥ 2 = t 1 . By clause 1 and The Free Fisher Information of a Noncommutative Law §fisher ,
Φ ∗ ( μ ) = ∑ j = 1 d ∥ ξ μ , j ∥ H μ 2 ≤ ∑ j = 1 d 1 t = d t . \Phi^{*}(\mu)=\sum_{j=1}^{d}\lVert\xi_{\mu,j}\rVert_{\mathcal{H}_{\mu}}^{2}\le\sum_{j=1}^{d}\frac{1}{t}=\frac{d}{t}. Φ ∗ ( μ ) = j = 1 ∑ d ∥ ξ μ , j ∥ H μ 2 ≤ j = 1 ∑ d t 1 = t d .