TheoremBase

Proof sketch: a vanishing combination of a subfamily extends by zero coefficients; a one-term subfamily cannot be zero; a nonzero last coefficient would put the new vector in the span; and the dependence lemma takes the shortest dependent initial segment.

Proof

Routine facts about nonempty segments are used without comment (Toolkit for AL2). We begin with the empty family. For n=0n=0 the condition of Linearly Independent and Linearly Dependent Finite Families (i) asks that Ξ»i=0\lambda_{i}=0 for every i∈[0]=βˆ…i\in[0]=\emptyset, which holds for every λ∈K0\lambda\in K^{0}. So vv is linearly independent, which is (vi).

Next, let vv be linearly independent and k:[m]β†’[n]k:[m]\to[n] injective, and let (ΞΌ1,…,ΞΌm)∈Km(\mu_{1},\dots,\mu_{m})\in K^{m} with βˆ‘l=1mΞΌlvk(l)=0V\sum_{l=1}^{m}\mu_{l}v_{k(l)}=0_{V}. Define λ∈Kn\lambda\in K^{n} by Ξ»k(l)=ΞΌl\lambda_{k(l)}=\mu_{l} for l∈[m]l\in[m] and Ξ»i=0\lambda_{i}=0 for iβˆ‰k([m])i\notin k([m]); this is well defined because kk is injective. Split [n][n] into k([m])k([m]) and its complement BB, a finite set (Finite Sets: the Pigeonhole Principle, Uniqueness of the Length, Subsets, Unions, Products, Images, Bounded Sets of Natural Numbers, Extreme Elements, Sets of Maps, Finite Unions and Finite Choice (iv)), by Iterated Operations over Finite Sets: Singletons, Disjoint Unions, Reindexing, Products of Sets, Termwise Combination, Homomorphisms and Intervals (ii), and reindex the sum over the first part by the bijection k:[m]β†’k([m])k:[m]\to k([m]) (Iterated Operations over Finite Sets: Singletons, Disjoint Unions, Reindexing, Products of Sets, Termwise Combination, Homomorphisms and Intervals (iii)). On BB the coefficients Ξ»i\lambda_{i} are 00. The zero combinations βˆ‘i=1n0 vi\sum_{i=1}^{n}0\,v_{i} and βˆ‘l=1m0 vk(l)\sum_{l=1}^{m}0\,v_{k(l)} are both 0V0_{V} (The Span of a Finite Family is the Smallest Subspace Containing It (i)); splitting the first in the same way shows that the part of the sum over BB is 0V0_{V}. Hence

βˆ‘i=1nΞ»ivi=βˆ‘l=1mΞΌlvk(l)=0V,\sum_{i=1}^{n}\lambda_{i}v_{i}=\sum_{l=1}^{m}\mu_{l}v_{k(l)}=0_{V},

so every Ξ»i=0\lambda_{i}=0 by Linearly Independent and Linearly Dependent Finite Families (i), and in particular every ΞΌl=Ξ»k(l)=0\mu_{l}=\lambda_{k(l)}=0. This proves (i).

For (ii), let vv be linearly independent and j∈[n]j\in[n]. The one-term family (vj)(v_{j}), given by k:[1]β†’[n]k:[1]\to[n], 1↦j1\mapsto j, is linearly independent by (i). Its linear combination with coefficient 11 is 1vj=vj1v_{j}=v_{j} (a one-term sum is its term, by Iterated Operations over an Interval: Extracting One Term and Reversing the Order (i) with n=0n=0 and Span of a Finite Family; Spanning Families (i); and Vector Space over a Field (vi)). If vjv_{j} were 0V0_{V}, independence would force 1=01=0, contradicting Fields (i). So vjβ‰ 0Vv_{j}\neq0_{V}.

For (iii), let vv be linearly independent and wβˆ‰span⁑(v1,…,vn)w\notin\operatorname{span}(v_{1},\dots,v_{n}). By Iterated Operations over Finite Sets: Singletons, Disjoint Unions, Reindexing, Products of Sets, Termwise Combination, Homomorphisms and Intervals (vii), a vanishing linear combination of (v1,…,vn,w)(v_{1},\dots,v_{n},w) reads

βˆ‘i=1nΞ»ivi+Ξ»n+1w=0V.\sum_{i=1}^{n}\lambda_{i}v_{i}+\lambda_{n+1}w=0_{V}.

Suppose that Ξ»n+1β‰ 0\lambda_{n+1}\neq0, choose μ∈K\mu\in K with Ξ»n+1ΞΌ=1\lambda_{n+1}\mu=1 (Fields (i)), so that ΞΌΞ»n+1=1\mu\lambda_{n+1}=1 by commutativity, and put c=βˆ’ΞΌc=-\mu. Then Ξ»n+1w=βˆ’βˆ‘i=1nΞ»ivi\lambda_{n+1}w=-\sum_{i=1}^{n}\lambda_{i}v_{i} by The Zero Vector, Negatives and Differences in a Vector Space (ii), so, by Vector Space over a Field (vi), Vector Space over a Field (v), Elementary Identities in a Vector Space (iv) and The Span of a Finite Family is the Smallest Subspace Containing It (i),

w=ΞΌ(Ξ»n+1w)=cβˆ‘i=1nΞ»ivi=βˆ‘i=1n(cΞ»i)vi∈span⁑(v1,…,vn),w=\mu(\lambda_{n+1}w)=c\sum_{i=1}^{n}\lambda_{i}v_{i}=\sum_{i=1}^{n}(c\lambda_{i})v_{i}\in\operatorname{span}(v_{1},\dots,v_{n}),

contrary to the choice of ww. Hence Ξ»n+1=0\lambda_{n+1}=0, so Ξ»n+1w=0w=0V\lambda_{n+1}w=0w=0_{V} (Elementary Identities in a Vector Space (ii)) and βˆ‘i=1nΞ»ivi=0V\sum_{i=1}^{n}\lambda_{i}v_{i}=0_{V}, and every Ξ»i=0\lambda_{i}=0 by the independence of vv. So the extended family is linearly independent.

For (iv), let vv be linearly dependent. The empty family is linearly independent by (vi), so nβ‰₯1n\geq1. For j∈{0,…,n}j\in\{0,\dots,n\} let (v1,…,vj)(v_{1},\dots,v_{j}) be the subfamily of vv given by the inclusion [j]β†’[n][j]\to[n], as in (i). Let j∈[n]j\in[n] be least such that (v1,…,vj)(v_{1},\dots,v_{j}) is linearly dependent; it exists because (v1,…,vn)=v(v_{1},\dots,v_{n})=v is dependent. Then (v1,…,vjβˆ’1)(v_{1},\dots,v_{j-1}) is linearly independent, by the minimality of jj if jβ‰₯2j\geq2 and by (vi) if j=1j=1. The family (v1,…,vj)(v_{1},\dots,v_{j}) is the extension of (v1,…,vjβˆ’1)(v_{1},\dots,v_{j-1}) by vjv_{j} (unique by Finite Sets: Removing an Element, Injective Self-Maps, Infinite Sets, Sets of Permutations, Pairs and Extended Tuples (vi)); if vjv_{j} lay outside span⁑(v1,…,vjβˆ’1)\operatorname{span}(v_{1},\dots,v_{j-1}), (iii) would make it linearly independent, contrary to the choice of jj. Hence vj∈span⁑(v1,…,vjβˆ’1)v_{j}\in\operatorname{span}(v_{1},\dots,v_{j-1}), which proves (iv).

Finally, for (v), let j∈[n]j\in[n] with vj∈span⁑(v(j))v_{j}\in\operatorname{span}(v^{(j)}), and write (Span of a Finite Family; Spanning Families (ii))

vj=βˆ‘i=1nβˆ’1ΞΌivi(j)=βˆ‘i=1nβˆ’1ΞΌivgj(i),v_{j}=\sum_{i=1}^{n-1}\mu_{i}v^{(j)}_{i}=\sum_{i=1}^{n-1}\mu_{i}v_{g_{j}(i)},

with gjg_{j} the gap map of Bijections between Intervals: the Gap Map and the Reversal (i). The coefficients Ξ»j=βˆ’1\lambda_{j}=-1 and Ξ»gj(i)=ΞΌi\lambda_{g_{j}(i)}=\mu_{i} for i∈[nβˆ’1]i\in[n-1] give βˆ‘i=1nΞ»ivi=vj+(βˆ’1)vj=0V\sum_{i=1}^{n}\lambda_{i}v_{i}=v_{j}+(-1)v_{j}=0_{V}, by Iterated Operations over an Interval: Extracting One Term and Reversing the Order (i) (applied with nβˆ’1n-1 in place of nn) and Elementary Identities in a Vector Space (iv); and Ξ»jβ‰ 0\lambda_{j}\neq0, as 0β‰ 10\neq1 in KK (Fields (i)). So vv is linearly dependent (Linearly Independent and Linearly Dependent Finite Families (ii)), which is (v).

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…