TheoremBase

Proof of Borel Sets and Measurable Maps in a Separable Metric Space

lemmalem:separable-metric-borel-toolkit-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron Β·
Verified by 0 users Β· Flagged by 0 users
Reason: Proof of the four claims: countability of the ball family and the basis property via halving the radius and a rational approximation; generation of the Borel sigma-algebra by minimality in both directions; the measurability criterion via the sigma-algebra of sets with measurable preimage, together with openness of the half-line for the real-valued form; and the product datum and pair measurability from the maximum form of the product metric.

Proof

Let N\mathbb{N} denote the natural numbers, and write Οƒ(E)\sigma(\mathcal{E}) for the Οƒ\sigma-algebra generated by E\mathcal{E}. By the symmetry axiom of a metric we have Bd(q,s)={y∈X:d(y,q)<s}B_d(q,s)=\{y\in X:d(y,q)<s\} for every q∈Xq\in X and every real s>0s>0, and we use this identification without further comment.

Claim 1.

Countability. The set Q>0\mathbb{Q}_{>0} is a subset of Q\mathbb{Q}, which is countable by claim 2 of The Integers and the Rational Numbers are Countable; hence Q>0\mathbb{Q}_{>0} is countable by claim 3 of Basic Properties of Countable Sets. Since DD is countable, the set DΓ—Q>0D\times\mathbb{Q}_{>0} is countable by claim 1 of Products and Powers of Countable Sets. The map sending (q,s)∈DΓ—Q>0(q,s)\in D\times\mathbb{Q}_{>0} to Bd(q,s)B_d(q,s) is, by the description of E\mathcal{E} in the statement, a surjection onto E\mathcal{E}; so E\mathcal{E} is countable by claim 4 of Basic Properties of Countable Sets.

Basis property. Let U∈TdU\in\mathcal{T}_d and let VV be the union of those members of E\mathcal{E} that are contained in UU, the union of an empty family being empty. Every such member is a subset of UU, so VβŠ†UV\subseteq U.

For the reverse inclusion let x∈Ux\in U. Since UU is open in (X,d)(X,d) there is a real number r>0r>0 with Bd(x,r)βŠ†UB_d(x,r)\subseteq U. By claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field there is a real number hh with 0<h0<h and h+h=rh+h=r. By claim 1 of The Rational Numbers are Dense in the Real Numbers, applied to the pair 0<h0<h, there is s∈Qs\in\mathbb{Q} with 0<s<h0<s<h; thus s∈Q>0s\in\mathbb{Q}_{>0}. Since DD is dense in XX for Td\mathcal{T}_d, the closure of DD in XX is XX and so contains xx; by Characterization of the Closure in a Metric Space by Open Balls, condition 1 there implies condition 3, so there is q∈Dq\in D with d(x,q)<sd(x,q)<s. In particular x∈Bd(q,s)x\in B_d(q,s), and Bd(q,s)B_d(q,s) is a member of E\mathcal{E}.

We check that Bd(q,s)βŠ†UB_d(q,s)\subseteq U. Let w∈Bd(q,s)w\in B_d(q,s), so that d(q,w)<sd(q,w)<s. Adding the inequalities d(x,q)<sd(x,q)<s and d(q,w)<sd(q,w)<s by claim 3 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives d(x,q)+d(q,w)<s+sd(x,q)+d(q,w)<s+s. The triangle inequality for dd gives d(x,w)≀d(x,q)+d(q,w)d(x,w)\le d(x,q)+d(q,w), so claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field yields d(x,w)<s+sd(x,w)<s+s. Adding the inequality s<hs<h to itself, again by claim 3 there, gives s+s<h+h=rs+s<h+h=r; since s+s<rs+s<r implies s+s≀rs+s\le r, a second application of claim 2 gives d(x,w)<rd(x,w)<r. Hence w∈Bd(x,r)βŠ†Uw\in B_d(x,r)\subseteq U.

So Bd(q,s)B_d(q,s) is a member of E\mathcal{E} contained in UU, whence x∈Bd(q,s)βŠ†Vx\in B_d(q,s)\subseteq V. As x∈Ux\in U was arbitrary, UβŠ†VU\subseteq V, and therefore U=VU=V.

Claim 2. By Open Ball in a Metric Space is Open every member of E\mathcal{E} is open in (X,d)(X,d), so EβŠ†Td\mathcal{E}\subseteq\mathcal{T}_d. By claim 2 of Intersections of Sigma-Algebras and Minimality of the Generated Sigma-Algebra, B(X,d)\mathcal{B}(X,d) is a Οƒ\sigma-algebra on XX containing Td\mathcal{T}_d, hence containing E\mathcal{E}; by the minimality assertion of that same claim, Οƒ(E)βŠ†B(X,d)\sigma(\mathcal{E})\subseteq\mathcal{B}(X,d).

For the reverse inclusion, let U∈TdU\in\mathcal{T}_d and let EU\mathcal{E}_U be the family of those members of E\mathcal{E} that are contained in UU, so that UU is the union of EU\mathcal{E}_U by claim 1. Being a subfamily of the countable family E\mathcal{E}, EU\mathcal{E}_U is countable by claim 3 of Basic Properties of Countable Sets. By claim 2 of Intersections of Sigma-Algebras and Minimality of the Generated Sigma-Algebra the family Οƒ(E)\sigma(\mathcal{E}) is a Οƒ\sigma-algebra on XX containing E\mathcal{E}.

If EU\mathcal{E}_U has no members then UU is empty; since XβˆˆΟƒ(E)X\in\sigma(\mathcal{E}) and Οƒ(E)\sigma(\mathcal{E}) is closed under complements relative to XX by the Οƒ\sigma-algebra axioms, the set Xβˆ–XX\setminus X, which is empty, lies in Οƒ(E)\sigma(\mathcal{E}), so UβˆˆΟƒ(E)U\in\sigma(\mathcal{E}). Otherwise EU\mathcal{E}_U is nonempty and countable, so by the definition of a countable set there is a sequence (Em)m∈N(E_m)_{m\in\mathbb{N}} whose set of terms is EU\mathcal{E}_U; then UU is the union of the sets EmE_m over m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N}. Each EmE_m belongs to E\mathcal{E} and hence to Οƒ(E)\sigma(\mathcal{E}), so UβˆˆΟƒ(E)U\in\sigma(\mathcal{E}) by the third Οƒ\sigma-algebra axiom.

Thus TdβŠ†Οƒ(E)\mathcal{T}_d\subseteq\sigma(\mathcal{E}). Since B(X,d)\mathcal{B}(X,d) is by definition the Οƒ\sigma-algebra generated by Td\mathcal{T}_d, minimality gives B(X,d)βŠ†Οƒ(E)\mathcal{B}(X,d)\subseteq\sigma(\mathcal{E}). The two inclusions give Οƒ(E)=B(X,d)\sigma(\mathcal{E})=\mathcal{B}(X,d).

Claim 3. Suppose first that YY is measurable with respect to F\mathcal{F} and B(X,d)\mathcal{B}(X,d). Let q∈Dq\in D and s∈Q>0s\in\mathbb{Q}_{>0}. As in claim 2, Bd(q,s)B_d(q,s) is open in (X,d)(X,d) and hence belongs to B(X,d)\mathcal{B}(X,d), and

Yβˆ’1(Bd(q,s))={Ο‰βˆˆΞ©:d(Y(Ο‰),q)<s}.Y^{-1}\bigl(B_d(q,s)\bigr)=\{\omega\in\Omega: d(Y(\omega),q)<s\}.

By measurability this set belongs to F\mathcal{F}.

Conversely, suppose that {Ο‰βˆˆΞ©:d(Y(Ο‰),q)<s}∈F\{\omega\in\Omega:d(Y(\omega),q)<s\}\in\mathcal{F} for every q∈Dq\in D and every s∈Q>0s\in\mathbb{Q}_{>0}. Let G\mathcal{G} be the family of those subsets BβŠ†XB\subseteq X with Yβˆ’1(B)∈FY^{-1}(B)\in\mathcal{F}. Then G\mathcal{G} is a Οƒ\sigma-algebra on XX: first, Yβˆ’1(X)=Ω∈FY^{-1}(X)=\Omega\in\mathcal{F}, so X∈GX\in\mathcal{G}; second, if B∈GB\in\mathcal{G} then Yβˆ’1(Xβˆ–B)=Ξ©βˆ–Yβˆ’1(B)Y^{-1}(X\setminus B)=\Omega\setminus Y^{-1}(B), which lies in F\mathcal{F}; third, if (Bm)m∈N(B_m)_{m\in\mathbb{N}} is a sequence in G\mathcal{G} then the preimage of the union of the BmB_m is the union of the sets Yβˆ’1(Bm)Y^{-1}(B_m), which lies in F\mathcal{F}. By the displayed hypothesis, Yβˆ’1(Bd(q,s))∈FY^{-1}(B_d(q,s))\in\mathcal{F} for all q∈Dq\in D and s∈Q>0s\in\mathbb{Q}_{>0}, that is, EβŠ†G\mathcal{E}\subseteq\mathcal{G}. Minimality (claim 2 of Intersections of Sigma-Algebras and Minimality of the Generated Sigma-Algebra) gives Οƒ(E)βŠ†G\sigma(\mathcal{E})\subseteq\mathcal{G}, and claim 2 above gives B(X,d)βŠ†G\mathcal{B}(X,d)\subseteq\mathcal{G}. Thus Yβˆ’1(B)∈FY^{-1}(B)\in\mathcal{F} for every B∈B(X,d)B\in\mathcal{B}(X,d), that is, YY is measurable.

For the final assertion, let dRd_{\mathbb{R}} be the absolute-value metric on R\mathbb{R}, given by dR(a,b)=∣aβˆ’b∣d_{\mathbb{R}}(a,b)=|a-b|, and assume that for every q∈Dq\in D the map gq:Ξ©β†’Rg_q:\Omega\to\mathbb{R}, gq(Ο‰)=d(Y(Ο‰),q)g_q(\omega)=d(Y(\omega),q), is measurable with respect to F\mathcal{F} and B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}). Fix q∈Dq\in D and s∈Q>0s\in\mathbb{Q}_{>0} and set H={t∈R:t<s}H=\{t\in\mathbb{R}:t<s\}.

We check that HH is open in (R,dR)(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}). Let t0∈Ht_0\in H, so t0<st_0<s. By claim 1 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, adding βˆ’t0-t_0 to both sides gives t0βˆ’t0<sβˆ’t0t_0-t_0<s-t_0, and t0βˆ’t0=0t_0-t_0=0 by claim 3 of Additive Cancellation and Elementary Additive Identities in a Field, so the real number r0=sβˆ’t0r_0=s-t_0 satisfies 0<r00<r_0. Let t∈BdR(t0,r0)t\in B_{d_{\mathbb{R}}}(t_0,r_0), that is ∣t0βˆ’t∣<r0|t_0-t|<r_0. By claim 3 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field we have tβˆ’t0β‰€βˆ£tβˆ’t0∣t-t_0\le|t-t_0|, and ∣tβˆ’t0∣=∣t0βˆ’t∣|t-t_0|=|t_0-t| by claim 2 there, so tβˆ’t0β‰€βˆ£t0βˆ’t∣t-t_0\le|t_0-t|; since ∣t0βˆ’t∣<r0|t_0-t|<r_0, claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives tβˆ’t0<r0=sβˆ’t0t-t_0<r_0=s-t_0. Adding t0t_0 to both sides, again by claim 1 of that lemma, and simplifying with claim 3 of Additive Cancellation and Elementary Additive Identities in a Field, gives t<st<s, so t∈Ht\in H. Hence BdR(t0,r0)βŠ†HB_{d_{\mathbb{R}}}(t_0,r_0)\subseteq H, and HH is open in (R,dR)(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}).

Therefore HH belongs to the Borel Οƒ\sigma-algebra of the metric space (R,dR)(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}), which equals B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) by claim 2 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space. Consequently

gqβˆ’1(H)={Ο‰βˆˆΞ©:d(Y(Ο‰),q)<s}∈F.g_q^{-1}(H)=\{\omega\in\Omega: d(Y(\omega),q)<s\}\in\mathcal{F}.

Since q∈Dq\in D and s∈Q>0s\in\mathbb{Q}_{>0} were arbitrary, the criterion proved above applies and YY is measurable with respect to F\mathcal{F} and B(X,d)\mathcal{B}(X,d).

Claim 4. By claim 3 of Coordinatewise Convergence, Sequential Compactness and Density in a Product Metric Space the set DΓ—Dβ€²D\times D' is countable and dense in XΓ—Xβ€²X\times X' for the topology of subsets open in (XΓ—Xβ€²,dXΓ—Xβ€²)(X\times X',d_{X\times X'}), and it is nonempty because DD and Dβ€²D' are nonempty. Hence ((XΓ—Xβ€²,dXΓ—Xβ€²),DΓ—Dβ€²)\bigl((X\times X',d_{X\times X'}),D\times D'\bigr) is a separable metric datum, which is the first assertion of claim 4. Since claims 1, 2 and 3 are asserted for every separable metric datum, they apply to it, and we use them for it below.

Let (q,qβ€²)∈DΓ—Dβ€²(q,q')\in D\times D' and s∈Q>0s\in\mathbb{Q}_{>0}. By the definition of the product metric,

dXΓ—Xβ€²(Z(Ο‰),(q,qβ€²))=max⁑{d(Y(Ο‰),q),Β dβ€²(Yβ€²(Ο‰),qβ€²)}.d_{X\times X'}\bigl(Z(\omega),(q,q')\bigr)=\max\bigl\{d(Y(\omega),q),\ d'(Y'(\omega),q')\bigr\}.

By the definition of the maximum of two elements of a totally ordered set, this maximum is one of the two numbers and each of the two numbers is at most the maximum. Hence the maximum is less than ss if and only if both numbers are less than ss: if both are less than ss then so is the maximum, being one of them; and if the maximum is less than ss then each number is less than ss by claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. Therefore

{Ο‰βˆˆΞ©:dXΓ—Xβ€²(Z(Ο‰),(q,qβ€²))<s}={Ο‰βˆˆΞ©:d(Y(Ο‰),q)<s}∩{Ο‰βˆˆΞ©:dβ€²(Yβ€²(Ο‰),qβ€²)<s}.\{\omega\in\Omega: d_{X\times X'}(Z(\omega),(q,q'))<s\}=\{\omega\in\Omega: d(Y(\omega),q)<s\}\cap\{\omega\in\Omega: d'(Y'(\omega),q')<s\}.

Applying claim 3 to YY with the dense set DD, and to Yβ€²Y' with the dense set Dβ€²D', in the direction from measurability to the displayed condition, both sets on the right belong to F\mathcal{F}; hence so does their intersection, a Οƒ\sigma-algebra being closed under intersections of two of its members as recorded with the Οƒ\sigma-algebra axioms.

Since (q,qβ€²)∈DΓ—Dβ€²(q,q')\in D\times D' and s∈Q>0s\in\mathbb{Q}_{>0} were arbitrary, claim 3 applied to (XΓ—Xβ€²,dXΓ—Xβ€²)(X\times X',d_{X\times X'}) with the dense set DΓ—Dβ€²D\times D', in the direction from the condition to measurability, shows that ZZ is measurable with respect to F\mathcal{F} and B(XΓ—Xβ€²,dXΓ—Xβ€²)\mathcal{B}(X\times X',d_{X\times X'}).

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…