TheoremBase

Proof of The Structure Estimate at a Maximiser of the Wasserstein-Doubled Difference

lemmalem:comparison-estimate-wasserstein-2026d
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 13,772 chars · 28 deps · depth 41 Reason: Proof carried forward onto lem:comparison-estimate-wasserstein-2026d; notion reference moved to -2026g (the sub/supersolution property is used only at the lemma's delta in (0,1)).

At a maximiser, the test functions of the doubling lemma feed the viscosity definitions, and the resulting data are glued back to the new maximising pair along composite couplings. Shift-coercivity bounds their scores, closed score places the pair in the score domain, and shift-semicontinuity passes the two viscosity inequalities to the limit, with Ishii's admitted matrices kept exactly. Properness and the structure condition then give the estimate.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. We write WW for W2W_{2}, M=M(δ,α)M=M(\delta,\alpha) and Ψ=Ψδ,α\Psi=\Psi_{\delta,\alpha}. For n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N} let ϵn\epsilon_{n} be the multiplicative inverse of the positive real attached to nn (The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background §numbers), so that 0<ϵn≤10<\epsilon_{n}\le1; the real sequences (ϵn)n(\epsilon_{n})_{n} and (ϵn2)n(\epsilon_{n}^{2})_{n} converge to 00 by The Archimedean Property of the Real Numbers and Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences. The distance on S(d)\mathcal{S}(d) is dS(d)(P,P′)=∥P−P′∥d_{\mathcal{S}(d)}(P,P')=\lVert P-P'\rVert, a metric (Wasserstein Spaces, Random Vectors, Vector Fields and Symmetric Matrices in Every Dimension: Standing Notation §matrices).

Step 0 (Norms along a coupling). Let ν,μ∈P2(Rd)\nu,\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}), π∈Π(ν,μ)\pi\in\Pi(\nu,\mu), q∈L2(ν;Rd)q\in L^{2}(\nu;\mathbb{R}^{d}) and η∈L2(μ;Rd)\eta\in L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d}). The maps q∘pr1q\circ\mathrm{pr}_{1} and η∘pr2\eta\circ\mathrm{pr}_{2} (for representatives) are Borel, and by the change-of-variables formula and (pr1)#π=ν(\mathrm{pr}_{1})_{\#}\pi=\nu, (pr2)#π=μ(\mathrm{pr}_{2})_{\#}\pi=\mu their classes in the real Hilbert space L2(π;Rd)L^{2}(\pi;\mathbb{R}^{d}) (Wasserstein Spaces, Random Vectors, Vector Fields and Symmetric Matrices in Every Dimension: Standing Notation §fields) have norms ∥q∥ν\lVert q\rVert_{\nu} and ∥η∥μ\lVert\eta\rVert_{\mu}, while the norm of their difference is the square root of the discrepancy of qq and η\eta along π\pi. The triangle inequality The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity §triangle gives

∥q∥ν≤(∫Rd+d∥q(x)−η(y)∥2 π(dz))1/2+∥η∥μ.\lVert q\rVert_{\nu}\le\Bigl(\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d+d}}\lVert q(x)-\eta(y)\rVert^{2}\,\pi(dz)\Bigr)^{1/2}+\lVert\eta\rVert_{\mu}.

With qq and η\eta the classes of id\mathrm{id} (Basic Properties of the Tangent Space: Closed Subspace, the Identity Map Belongs to It, Second-Moment Limits, and Representation of Bounded Functionals on Gradients §identity), the discrepancy is I(π)I(\pi) (Couplings of Two Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Their Quadratic Cost §cost) and ∥id∥ν2=M2(ν)\lVert\mathrm{id}\rVert_{\nu}^{2}=M_{2}(\nu), so M2(ν)≤I(π)+M2(μ)\sqrt{M_{2}(\nu)}\le\sqrt{I(\pi)}+\sqrt{M_{2}(\mu)}.

Step 1 (A maximising pair and admitted matrices). By Existence, Penalty Bounds and Monotonicity of the Maximum of the Wasserstein-Doubled Difference of Bounded Functions §maximiser there is (μ^,ν^)∈D×D(\hat{\mu},\hat{\nu})\in\mathcal{D}\times\mathcal{D} with Ψ(μ^,ν^)=M\Psi(\hat{\mu},\hat{\nu})=M. Apply Intrinsic Test Functions at a Maximiser of the Wasserstein-Doubled Difference with the present δ\delta, α\alpha, uu, vv, bb, b′b' and (μ^,ν^)(\hat{\mu},\hat{\nu}); its hypotheses are among ours. It provides ρ∗,σ∗∈D\rho^{*},\sigma^{*}\in\mathcal{D} and X,Y∈S(d)\mathbb{X},\mathbb{Y}\in\mathcal{S}(d); let SS, S′S' be the optimal maps named there, and put

V∗=α(id−S)∈L2(ρ∗;Rd),V∗′=α(S′−id)∈L2(σ∗;Rd),s∗=uδ−(ρ∗),t∗=vδ+(σ∗).V_{*}=\alpha(\mathrm{id}-S)\in L^{2}(\rho^{*};\mathbb{R}^{d}),\qquad V'_{*}=\alpha(S'-\mathrm{id})\in L^{2}(\sigma^{*};\mathbb{R}^{d}),\qquad s_{*}=u^{-}_{\delta}(\rho^{*}),\qquad t_{*}=v^{+}_{\delta}(\sigma^{*}).

By Intrinsic Test Functions at a Maximiser of the Wasserstein-Doubled Difference §maximiser, Ψ(ρ∗,σ∗)=M≥0\Psi(\rho^{*},\sigma^{*})=M\ge0, so Existence, Penalty Bounds and Monotonicity of the Maximum of the Wasserstein-Doubled Difference of Bounded Functions §penalty, read with the present e0e_{0}, gives δ∣E(ρ∗)∣≤∣b∣+∣b′∣+δ∣e0∣≤B\delta|\mathcal{E}(\rho^{*})|\le|b|+|b'|+\delta|e_{0}|\le B and likewise δ∣E(σ∗)∣≤B\delta|\mathcal{E}(\sigma^{*})|\le B, as 0<δ<10<\delta<1 gives δ∣e0∣≤∣e0∣\delta|e_{0}|\le|e_{0}| (claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field); by Intrinsic Test Functions at a Maximiser of the Wasserstein-Doubled Difference §admitted, (X,Y)(\mathbb{X},\mathbb{Y}) is admitted at α\alpha, so ∥X∥≤6α\lVert\mathbb{X}\rVert\le6\alpha and ∥Y∥≤6α\lVert\mathbb{Y}\rVert\le6\alpha (The Second-Order Structure Condition at Optimally Coupled Pairs on the Lift of the Wasserstein Space §admitted). As s∗−t∗=M+α2W(ρ∗,σ∗)2s_{*}-t_{*}=M+\tfrac{\alpha}{2}W(\rho^{*},\sigma^{*})^{2} and 0≤M0\le M, we have M≤s∗−t∗M\le s_{*}-t_{*} and t∗≤s∗t_{*}\le s_{*}. Since uδ−≤b−δE≤b−δe0u^{-}_{\delta}\le b-\delta\mathcal{E}\le b-\delta e_{0} and vδ+≥b′+δE≥b′+δe0v^{+}_{\delta}\ge b'+\delta\mathcal{E}\ge b'+\delta e_{0} on D\mathcal{D} (The Delta-Envelopes of Bounded Functions and Their Monotonicity in the Weight, for a Wasserstein-Coercive Penalty Pair §bounded and claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field),

b′+δe0≤t∗≤s∗≤b−δe0,b'+\delta e_{0}\le t_{*}\le s_{*}\le b-\delta e_{0},

and as 0<δ<10<\delta<1 gives ∣δe0∣≤∣e0∣|\delta e_{0}|\le|e_{0}| (claims 4 and 5 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field), ∣s∗∣≤∣b∣+∣b′∣+∣e0∣≤B|s_{*}|\le|b|+|b'|+|e_{0}|\le B and ∣t∗∣≤B|t_{*}|\le B (claim 6 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field).

Step 2 (Viscosity data on the subsolution side). Let n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}. By Intrinsic Test Functions at a Maximiser of the Wasserstein-Doubled Difference §subsolution with ε=ϵn\varepsilon=\epsilon_{n} there are ρn∈D\rho_{n}\in\mathcal{D}, an intrinsic test function φn\varphi_{n} on D\mathcal{D} with uδ−−φnu^{-}_{\delta}-\varphi_{n} having a local maximum relative to D\mathcal{D} at ρn\rho_{n}, and πn∈Π(ρn,ρ∗)\pi_{n}\in\Pi(\rho_{n},\rho^{*}) with

I(πn)<ϵn2,∣uδ−(ρn)−s∗∣<ϵn,∫Rd+d∥∇φn(ρn)(x)−V∗(y)∥2 πn(dz)<ϵn2,∥Hφn(ρn)−X∥<ϵn.I(\pi_{n})<\epsilon_{n}^{2},\quad|u^{-}_{\delta}(\rho_{n})-s_{*}|<\epsilon_{n},\quad\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d+d}}\lVert\nabla\varphi_{n}(\rho_{n})(x)-V_{*}(y)\rVert^{2}\,\pi_{n}(dz)<\epsilon_{n}^{2},\quad\lVert H_{\varphi_{n}}(\rho_{n})-\mathbb{X}\rVert<\epsilon_{n}.

As uu is a viscosity subsolution, Viscosity Subsolution, Supersolution and Solution of a Second-Order Equation on the Wasserstein Space §subsolution with φn\varphi_{n}, ρn\rho_{n} and ϵn\epsilon_{n} gives νn∈DΣ\nu_{n}\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}, γn∈Π(νn,ρn)\gamma_{n}\in\Pi(\nu_{n},\rho_{n}), sn∈Rs_{n}\in\mathbb{R}, qn∈L2(νn;Rd)q_{n}\in L^{2}(\nu_{n};\mathbb{R}^{d}) and Xn∈S(d)X_{n}\in\mathcal{S}(d) with

I(γn)<ϵn2,∣uδ−(νn)−uδ−(ρn)∣<ϵn,∣sn−uδ−(ρn)∣<ϵn,I(\gamma_{n})<\epsilon_{n}^{2},\quad|u^{-}_{\delta}(\nu_{n})-u^{-}_{\delta}(\rho_{n})|<\epsilon_{n},\quad|s_{n}-u^{-}_{\delta}(\rho_{n})|<\epsilon_{n}, ∫Rd+d∥qn(x)−∇φn(ρn)(y)∥2 γn(dz)<ϵn2,∥Xn−Hφn(ρn)∥<ϵn,Fδ−(νn,sn,qn,Xn)≤ϵn.\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d+d}}\lVert q_{n}(x)-\nabla\varphi_{n}(\rho_{n})(y)\rVert^{2}\,\gamma_{n}(dz)<\epsilon_{n}^{2},\quad\lVert X_{n}-H_{\varphi_{n}}(\rho_{n})\rVert<\epsilon_{n},\quad F^{-}_{\delta}(\nu_{n},s_{n},q_{n},X_{n})\le\epsilon_{n}.

Let βn\beta_{n} be a gluing of γn\gamma_{n} and πn\pi_{n} (Gluing Two Couplings over a Common Middle Marginal, and the Composite Coupling §glued) and κn=(q1,q3)#βn∈Π(νn,ρ∗)\kappa_{n}=(\mathrm{q}_{1},\mathrm{q}_{3})_{\#}\beta_{n}\in\Pi(\nu_{n},\rho^{*}). By Gluing Two Couplings over a Common Middle Marginal, and the Composite Coupling §composite and A Triangle Inequality for Discrepancies Along a Composite Coupling §triangle, applied with qnq_{n}, ∇φn(ρn)\nabla\varphi_{n}(\rho_{n}) and V∗V_{*}, and taking square roots (claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field),

I(κn)<2ϵn,(∫Rd+d∥qn(x)−V∗(y)∥2 κn(dz))1/2<2ϵn;\sqrt{I(\kappa_{n})}<2\epsilon_{n},\qquad\Bigl(\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d+d}}\lVert q_{n}(x)-V_{*}(y)\rVert^{2}\,\kappa_{n}(dz)\Bigr)^{1/2}<2\epsilon_{n};

and by the triangle inequalities of ∣⋅∣|\cdot| (claim 5 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field) and of the metric dS(d)d_{\mathcal{S}(d)},

∣uδ−(νn)−s∗∣<2ϵn,∣sn−s∗∣<2ϵn,∥Xn−X∥<2ϵn.|u^{-}_{\delta}(\nu_{n})-s_{*}|<2\epsilon_{n},\qquad|s_{n}-s_{*}|<2\epsilon_{n},\qquad\lVert X_{n}-\mathbb{X}\rVert<2\epsilon_{n}.

Hence (κn)n(\kappa_{n})_{n} is a sequence of couplings of vanishing cost from (νn)n(\nu_{n})_{n} to ρ∗\rho^{*}, (qn)n(q_{n})_{n} converges strongly to V∗V_{*} along it, (sn)n(s_{n})_{n} converges to s∗s_{*} and (Xn)n(X_{n})_{n} to X\mathbb{X} (squares of the bounds 2ϵn2\epsilon_{n} being 4ϵn24\epsilon_{n}^{2}, and Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences). By Step 0 with κn\kappa_{n}, M2(νn)<M2(ρ∗)+2\sqrt{M_{2}(\nu_{n})}<\sqrt{M_{2}(\rho^{*})}+2 and ∥qn∥νn<∥V∗∥ρ∗+2\lVert q_{n}\rVert_{\nu_{n}}<\lVert V_{*}\rVert_{\rho^{*}}+2; also ∣sn∣<B+2|s_{n}|<B+2 and ∥Xn∥≤dS(d)(Xn,X)+∥X∥<6α+2\lVert X_{n}\rVert\le d_{\mathcal{S}(d)}(X_{n},\mathbb{X})+\lVert\mathbb{X}\rVert<6\alpha+2. Finally νn∈DΣ⊆D\nu_{n}\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}\subseteq\mathcal{D}, so e0≤E(νn)e_{0}\le\mathcal{E}(\nu_{n}), and −B−2<uδ−(νn)≤b−δE(νn)-B-2<u^{-}_{\delta}(\nu_{n})\le b-\delta\mathcal{E}(\nu_{n}) (The Delta-Envelopes of Bounded Functions and Their Monotonicity in the Weight, for a Wasserstein-Coercive Penalty Pair §bounded) gives E(νn)<δ−1(∣b∣+B+2)\mathcal{E}(\nu_{n})<\delta^{-1}(|b|+B+2); so ∣E(νn)∣<δ−1(∣b∣+B+2)+∣e0∣+1|\mathcal{E}(\nu_{n})|<\delta^{-1}(|b|+B+2)+|e_{0}|+1.

Step 3 (Viscosity data on the supersolution side). In the same way, Intrinsic Test Functions at a Maximiser of the Wasserstein-Doubled Difference §supersolution with ε=ϵn\varepsilon=\epsilon_{n}, the supersolution property Viscosity Subsolution, Supersolution and Solution of a Second-Order Equation on the Wasserstein Space §supersolution of vv, a gluing and A Triangle Inequality for Discrepancies Along a Composite Coupling §triangle give νn′∈DΣ\nu'_{n}\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}, κn′∈Π(νn′,σ∗)\kappa'_{n}\in\Pi(\nu'_{n},\sigma^{*}), tn∈Rt_{n}\in\mathbb{R}, qn′∈L2(νn′;Rd)q'_{n}\in L^{2}(\nu'_{n};\mathbb{R}^{d}) and Yn∈S(d)Y_{n}\in\mathcal{S}(d) with −ϵn≤Fδ+(νn′,tn,qn′,Yn)-\epsilon_{n}\le F^{+}_{\delta}(\nu'_{n},t_{n},q'_{n},Y_{n}), I(κn′)<2ϵn\sqrt{I(\kappa'_{n})}<2\epsilon_{n}, the discrepancy of qn′q'_{n} and V∗′V'_{*} along κn′\kappa'_{n} below 4ϵn24\epsilon_{n}^{2}, ∣vδ+(νn′)−t∗∣<2ϵn|v^{+}_{\delta}(\nu'_{n})-t_{*}|<2\epsilon_{n}, ∣tn−t∗∣<2ϵn|t_{n}-t_{*}|<2\epsilon_{n} and ∥Yn−Y∥<2ϵn\lVert Y_{n}-\mathbb{Y}\rVert<2\epsilon_{n}. So (κn′)n(\kappa'_{n})_{n} has vanishing cost, (qn′)n(q'_{n})_{n} converges strongly to V∗′V'_{*} along it, tn→t∗t_{n}\to t_{*} and Yn→YY_{n}\to\mathbb{Y}; and M2(νn′)<M2(σ∗)+2\sqrt{M_{2}(\nu'_{n})}<\sqrt{M_{2}(\sigma^{*})}+2, ∥qn′∥νn′<∥V∗′∥σ∗+2\lVert q'_{n}\rVert_{\nu'_{n}}<\lVert V'_{*}\rVert_{\sigma^{*}}+2, ∣tn∣<B+2|t_{n}|<B+2, ∥Yn∥<6α+2\lVert Y_{n}\rVert<6\alpha+2, and, from b′+δE(νn′)≤vδ+(νn′)<B+2b'+\delta\mathcal{E}(\nu'_{n})\le v^{+}_{\delta}(\nu'_{n})<B+2 (The Delta-Envelopes of Bounded Functions and Their Monotonicity in the Weight, for a Wasserstein-Coercive Penalty Pair §bounded) and e0≤E(νn′)e_{0}\le\mathcal{E}(\nu'_{n}), ∣E(νn′)∣<δ−1(∣b′∣+B+2)+∣e0∣+1|\mathcal{E}(\nu'_{n})|<\delta^{-1}(|b'|+B+2)+|e_{0}|+1.

Step 4 (Shift-coercivity and closed score). Let

R′=M2(ρ∗)+M2(σ∗)+∥V∗∥ρ∗+∥V∗′∥σ∗+δ−1(∣b∣+∣b′∣+2B+4)+2∣e0∣+2B+12α+10,R'=\sqrt{M_{2}(\rho^{*})}+\sqrt{M_{2}(\sigma^{*})}+\lVert V_{*}\rVert_{\rho^{*}}+\lVert V'_{*}\rVert_{\sigma^{*}}+\delta^{-1}\bigl(|b|+|b'|+2B+4\bigr)+2|e_{0}|+2B+12\alpha+10,

a sum of nonnegative reals and 1010, which exceeds every bound listed at the end of Steps 2 and 3 and exceeds 22. For n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N} put ξn=(νn,sn,qn,Xn)\xi_{n}=(\nu_{n},s_{n},q_{n},X_{n}) and ηn=(νn′,tn,qn′,Yn)\eta_{n}=(\nu'_{n},t_{n},q'_{n},Y_{n}), test data for FF; they are R′R'-bounded, and Fδ−(ξn)−Fδ+(ηn)≤2ϵn≤2<R′F^{-}_{\delta}(\xi_{n})-F^{+}_{\delta}(\eta_{n})\le2\epsilon_{n}\le2<R', so ξn∈Sδ,R′−\xi_{n}\in S^{-}_{\delta,R'} and ηn∈Sδ,R′+\eta_{n}\in S^{+}_{\delta,R'} (Test Data for an Intrinsic Second-Order Equation Operator on the Wasserstein Space and the Admissible Sets §admissible), each witnessing the other. By the shift-coercivity condition there is a score bound C≥0C\ge0 for FF at (δ,R′)(\delta,R'), so ∥Σ(νn)∥νn≤C\lVert\Sigma(\nu_{n})\rVert_{\nu_{n}}\le C and ∥Σ(νn′)∥νn′≤C\lVert\Sigma(\nu'_{n})\rVert_{\nu'_{n}}\le C for every nn. By Penalty Pairs with Closed Score Along Couplings §closed at the level CC, applied to (νn)n(\nu_{n})_{n}, ρ∗\rho^{*} and (κn)n(\kappa_{n})_{n}, we get ρ∗∈DΣ\rho^{*}\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} and that (Σ(νn))n(\Sigma(\nu_{n}))_{n} converges weakly to Σ(ρ∗)\Sigma(\rho^{*}) along (κn)n(\kappa_{n})_{n}; likewise σ∗∈DΣ\sigma^{*}\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}, with (Σ(νn′))n(\Sigma(\nu'_{n}))_{n} converging weakly to Σ(σ∗)\Sigma(\sigma^{*}) along (κn′)n(\kappa'_{n})_{n}. So (ρ∗,σ∗)∈DΣ×DΣ(\rho^{*},\sigma^{*})\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}\times\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}, and ξ=(ρ∗,s∗,V∗,X)\xi=(\rho^{*},s_{*},V_{*},\mathbb{X}) and η=(σ∗,t∗,V∗′,Y)\eta=(\sigma^{*},t_{*},V'_{*},\mathbb{Y}) are test data for FF.

Step 5 (Shift-semicontinuity). Put R′′=R′+CR''=R'+C, positive. Every ξn\xi_{n} is R′′R''-bounded and ∥Σ(νn)∥νn≤R′′\lVert\Sigma(\nu_{n})\rVert_{\nu_{n}}\le R''; with Steps 2 and 4 this says that (ξn)n(\xi_{n})_{n} converges to ξ\xi along (κn)n(\kappa_{n})_{n} with score bounded by R′′R'', and likewise (ηn)n(\eta_{n})_{n} converges to η\eta along (κn′)n(\kappa'_{n})_{n} with score bounded by R′′R''. FF is shift-semicontinuous at (δ,R′′)(\delta,R'') (The Shift-Semicontinuity Condition for an Equation Operator on the Wasserstein Space §semicontinuity). Given ε>0\varepsilon>0 there is NN with ϵn≤ε\epsilon_{n}\le\varepsilon for n≥Nn\ge N, so Fδ−(ξn)≤0+εF^{-}_{\delta}(\xi_{n})\le0+\varepsilon and 0−ε≤Fδ+(ηn)0-\varepsilon\le F^{+}_{\delta}(\eta_{n}) for n≥Nn\ge N; the two implications of The Shift-Semicontinuity Condition for an Equation Operator on the Wasserstein Space §level with c=0c=0 give Fδ−(ξ)≤0≤Fδ+(η)F^{-}_{\delta}(\xi)\le0\le F^{+}_{\delta}(\eta).

Step 6 (Properness and the structure condition). The measures ρ∗,σ∗\rho^{*},\sigma^{*} lie in DΣ⊆D\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}\subseteq\mathcal{D}, which has the map property, so both ordered pairs (ρ∗,σ∗)(\rho^{*},\sigma^{*}) and (σ∗,ρ∗)(\sigma^{*},\rho^{*}) are uniquely mapped (The Map Property of a Set of Probability Measures §map-property); δ(∣E(ρ∗)∣+∣E(σ∗)∣)≤2B≤R\delta(|\mathcal{E}(\rho^{*})|+|\mathcal{E}(\sigma^{*})|)\le2B\le R; −R≤t∗≤R-R\le t_{*}\le R since ∣t∗∣≤B≤R|t_{*}|\le B\le R; and (X,Y)(\mathbb{X},\mathbb{Y}) is admitted at α\alpha. So The Second-Order Structure Condition at Uniquely Mapped Pairs on the Wasserstein Space §pair, for the pair (ω1,ω2)(\omega_{1},\omega_{2}) at RR with the value slot t∗t_{*}, gives

−ω1(αW(ρ∗,σ∗)2+α−1)−ω2(δ(∣E(ρ∗)∣+∣E(σ∗)∣+1),α)≤Fδ−(ρ∗,t∗,V∗,X)−Fδ+(η).-\omega_{1}\bigl(\alpha W(\rho^{*},\sigma^{*})^{2}+\alpha^{-1}\bigr)-\omega_{2}\bigl(\delta(|\mathcal{E}(\rho^{*})|+|\mathcal{E}(\sigma^{*})|+1),\alpha\bigr)\le F^{-}_{\delta}(\rho^{*},t_{*},V_{*},\mathbb{X})-F^{+}_{\delta}(\eta).

By The Bundle of Vector Fields over a Set of Measures, Second-Order Equation Operators on the Wasserstein Space, and Their Delta-Shifts §shifted, Fδ−(ρ∗,r,V∗,X)=F(ρ∗,r+δE(ρ∗),V∗+δΣ(ρ∗),X+δHE(ρ∗))F^{-}_{\delta}(\rho^{*},r,V_{*},\mathbb{X})=F(\rho^{*},r+\delta\mathcal{E}(\rho^{*}),V_{*}+\delta\Sigma(\rho^{*}),\mathbb{X}+\delta H_{\mathcal{E}}(\rho^{*})) for every r∈Rr\in\mathbb{R}, the last three arguments not depending on rr. We have t∗+δE(ρ∗)≤s∗+δE(ρ∗)t_{*}+\delta\mathcal{E}(\rho^{*})\le s_{*}+\delta\mathcal{E}(\rho^{*}), and both have absolute value at most B+B≤RB+B\le R (claim 5 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field), so the properness constant λ\lambda at RR (Locally Strictly Proper Second-Order Equation Operator on the Wasserstein Space §constant, with Q=DΣQ=\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}) gives

λ(s∗−t∗)≤Fδ−(ξ)−Fδ−(ρ∗,t∗,V∗,X).\lambda(s_{*}-t_{*})\le F^{-}_{\delta}(\xi)-F^{-}_{\delta}(\rho^{*},t_{*},V_{*},\mathbb{X}).

Adding the two displays and using Fδ−(ξ)−Fδ+(η)≤0F^{-}_{\delta}(\xi)-F^{+}_{\delta}(\eta)\le0 from Step 5,

λ(s∗−t∗)≤ω1(αW(ρ∗,σ∗)2+α−1)+ω2(δ(∣E(ρ∗)∣+∣E(σ∗)∣+1),α).\lambda(s_{*}-t_{*})\le\omega_{1}\bigl(\alpha W(\rho^{*},\sigma^{*})^{2}+\alpha^{-1}\bigr)+\omega_{2}\bigl(\delta(|\mathcal{E}(\rho^{*})|+|\mathcal{E}(\sigma^{*})|+1),\alpha\bigr).

Finally M≤s∗−t∗M\le s_{*}-t_{*} and 0<λ0<\lambda give λM≤λ(s∗−t∗)\lambda M\le\lambda(s_{*}-t_{*}) by claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. With Ψ(ρ∗,σ∗)=M\Psi(\rho^{*},\sigma^{*})=M and (ρ∗,σ∗)∈DΣ×DΣ(\rho^{*},\sigma^{*})\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}\times\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}, this is the claim.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…