Preliminaries.(P1) Joint measurability. Let H:[0,T]×E→R be bounded with u↦H(u,x) measurable on [0,T] for each x. Then (u,ω)↦1Ω0(ω)H(u,Xu(ω))=∑x∈EH(u,x)1Ω0(ω)1{Xu(ω)=x} is B[0,T]⊗F-measurable, by (D3) and Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions, since (u,ω)↦H(u,x) is product-measurable (its preimages are rectangles S×Ω with S∈B[0,T]). For 0≤s≤t≤T the integral over [s,t] of a bounded B[0,T]-measurable f equals the integral over [0,T] of 1[s,t]f, both being the integral over R of the same zero extension (claim 2 of Restricted Lebesgue Measure and Integral Toolkit on a Compact Interval), and (u,ω)↦1[s,t](u) is product-measurable by the rectangle argument. Hence, by the Tonelli theorem on [0,T]×Ω (applied to the positive and negative parts of 1[s,t](u)1Ω0H(u,Xu)), the map ω↦∫[s,t]1Ω0H(u,Xu)du is defined everywhere and F-measurable, and for every D∈F,
the inner expectation being a measurable function of u. (P2) Adjacent intervals. For a bounded B[0,T]-measurable f and 0≤s≤t≤T one has ∫[0,t]fdu−∫[0,s]fdu=∫[s,t]fdu and ∫[s,t]fdu≤(t−s)sup∣f∣: by claim 2 of Restricted Lebesgue Measure and Integral Toolkit on a Compact Interval each integral equals the integral over R of the corresponding zero extension, the zero extensions from [0,t] and [0,s] differ by the zero extension from (s,t], whose integral equals that of the zero extension from [s,t] because the two agree off the singleton {s}, which has Lebesgue measure0 (claim 6 of Restricted Lebesgue Measure and Integral Toolkit on a Compact Interval, applied on [s,t] with D=(s,t], for s<t); and [s,t] has measure t−s (claim 1 of Restricted Lebesgue Measure and Integral Toolkit on a Compact Interval). In particular, for ω∈Ω0, where (D4) expresses Tta(ω) as the integral of the [0,Λ]-valued map u↦ga(u,Xu(ω)), the path t↦Tta(ω) is nondecreasing and continuous with Tta−Tsa≤Λ(t−s). (P3) Counting paths. For a counting path c with first jump time τ1(c) and s≥0: c(s)≥1 if and only if τ1(c)≤s, by monotonicity and right-continuity of c (Counting Path and Its Jump Times; the set {t:c(t)≥1} is an interval unbounded above whose infimum it contains by right-continuity, or is empty).
Step 1: the one-step estimate. Fix 0≤r<r′≤T, put δ=r′−r and m=Λδ, fix D∈Fr and F:E→R, and write Y^a=Y^a,r for the residual clocks of (H2); note m=Λ(r′−r)≤Λ(T−r)=ϱr, so all residual-clock values used below are at times in [0,ϱr], where (H2) applies. Every residual path u↦Y^ua(ω) is itself a counting path (it starts at 0 and inherits monotonicity, integer values, right-continuity and unit jumps from the counting path of Ya), so (P3) applies to it. Define the frozen consumptions and frozen increments
both Fr-measurable by (D3), with ∣Ga∣≤2∥F∥. Let B2={∑aY^ma≥2} and B1={∑aY^ma≥1}. For each a let ξa=τ1(Y^a)∈[0,∞] be the first jump time of the residual clock (+∞ if it never jumps) and let ζa=ξa on {ξa≤m} and ζa=m+1 elsewhere. By (P3), {ζa≤s}={Y^sa≥1} for 0≤s≤m, {ζa≤s}={Y^ma≥1} for m<s<m+1, {ζa≤s}=Ω for s≥m+1, and {ζa≤s}=∅ for s<0; so ζa is a real random variable with σ(ζa)⊆σ(Y^ua:0≤u≤ϱr), and, since ca≤m, the map 1{Y^caa≥1}=1{ζa≤ca} is F-measurable (Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions). Put Φu=1Ω0∑aga(u,Xu)(F(ϕa(Xu))−F(Xu)), the integrand of claim (a), which is of the form (P1) with ∣Φu∣≤2∣A∣Λ∥F∥. We show
(1a) Pathwise identification on Ω0∖B2. Fix ω∈Ω0. For u∈[r,r′], (P2) gives 0≤Tua−Tra≤m, so Nua−Nra=Y^Tua−Traa≤Y^ma by monotonicity of the counting path Y^a. Now suppose also ω∈/B2, so that the grand total N=∑aNa, a nondecreasing path, satisfies Nr′−Nr≤1. We claim
F(Xr′)−F(Xr)=a∈A∑1{Y^caa≥1}Gaon Ω0∖B2.(1.2)
Case 1: Nr′=Nr. Then N is constant on [r,r′] by monotonicity, so Nu=Nu− for every u∈(r,r′], and by (H1) Xu=Xu− for every u∈(r,r′]; since the path is constant on the constancy intervals of (H1) and takes the same value on both sides of each constancy-interval endpoint in (r,r′], it is constant on [r,r′], so F(Xr′)−F(Xr)=0. Moreover the integrand of Ta equals ga(u,Xr) on [r,r′], so by (P2) Tr′a−Tra=ca, whence Y^caa=Nr′a−Nra=0 for every a, and the right side of (1.2) vanishes too. Case 2: Nr′=Nr+1. Put θ=inf{u∈(r,r′]:Nu=Nr+1}; by right-continuity of N (each Nua=YTuaa is right-continuous in u, the counting path Ya being right-continuous and Ta continuous and nondecreasing by (P2)) Nθ=Nr+1 and θ>r, and by monotonicity Nu=Nr for u∈[r,θ), so Nθ−=Nr: thus Nθ=Nθ−+1, and Nu=Nu− for every u∈(r,r′]∖{θ}. Since the increments Nr′a−Nra are nonnegative integers with sum 1, exactly one label b has Nr′b−Nrb=1, and b is the unique label with Nθb=Nθ−b. By (H1), Xu=Xu− for u∈(r,r′]∖{θ} and Xθ=ϕb(Xθ−); as in Case 1 the path is constant on [r,θ) with value Xr, so Xθ−=Xr, and constant on [θ,r′] with value ϕb(Xr). Hence F(Xr′)−F(Xr)=Gb. For a=b: Y^mb≥Nr′b−Nrb=1, so Y^ma=0 (as ω∈/B2), and Y^caa=0 since ca≤m. For b: on [r,θ) the integrand of Tb equals gb(u,Xr), so by (P2) and claim 6 of Restricted Lebesgue Measure and Integral Toolkit on a Compact Interval (the two integrands agree on the co-null set [r,θ) of [r,θ]) Tθb−Trb=∫[r,θ]gb(u,Xr)du≤cb, the inequality by monotonicity of the integral and (P2), the integrand being nonnegative; and Nθb−Nrb≥1 gives Y^Tθb−Trbb≥1, hence Y^cbb≥1 by monotonicity. Thus the right side of (1.2) equals Gb, proving (1.2).
(1b) Probability of B2 and B1. By (H2), Y^ma=Y^ma−Y^0a has the Poisson distribution with parameter m (for m>0 by the increment assertion of (H2) with p=1; for m=0 because Y^0a=0, the residual paths being counting paths, and the Poisson distribution with parameter 0 is the unit mass at 0), so E[Y^ma]=m and E[Y^ma(Y^ma−1)]=m2 by Factorial Moments and Moments of Every Order of the Poisson Distribution(a) with p=1 and p=2. Since Y^ma(Y^ma−1)≥0 is at least 2 on {Y^ma≥2}, Markov's inequality gives P(Y^ma≥2)≤m2/2 and P(Y^ma≥1)≤m. For a=b the events {Y^ma≥1} and {Y^mb≥1} are independent by (H2), so their intersection has probability at most m2. As B2⊆⋃a{Y^ma≥2}∪⋃a=b({Y^ma≥1}∩{Y^mb≥1}) and B1⊆⋃a{Y^ma≥1}, subadditivity (claim 4 of Basic Properties of a Measure, applied to the finite unions padded with empty sets) gives
P(B2)≤∣A∣m2/2+∣A∣2m2≤2∣A∣2m2,P(B1)≤∣A∣m.
Taking expectations in (1.2) (both sides are bounded, by 2∥F∥ and 2∣A∣∥F∥, and agree off B2∪(Ω∖Ω0), a set of probability at most P(B2)),
(1c) Freezing the clock reading. Fix a. The random variable ζa introduced above satisfies σ(ζa)⊆σ(Y^ua:0≤u≤ϱr) (as recorded there), hence σ(ζa) is independent of Fr by (H2), and 1{Y^caa≥1}=1{ζa≤ca}. Write Ga=Ga,+−Ga,− with Ga,±≥0 bounded and Fr-measurable, and for ± fixed put Ψ(ω,v)=1{v≤ca(ω)}Ga,±(ω)1D(ω) for v∈R; Ψ is Fr⊗B-measurable (B the Borel σ-algebra), since (ω,v)↦ca(ω)−v is product-measurable by Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions. Independence Fubini (claim 3, with G=Fr and the independent variable ζa) gives
Subtracting the two signs, E[1{Y^caa≥1}Ga1D]=E[ψa(ca)Ga1D]. Now for 0≤s≤m, Y^sa is Poisson with parameter s (as above, including s=0), and for an integer y≥0 one has y−1{y≥1}=max(y−1,0)≤y(y−1)/2 (both sides vanish for y∈{0,1}, and y−1≤y(y−1)/2 for y≥2), so
(1d) Unfreezing the state. Put Ia=∫[r,r′]1Ω0ga(u,Xu)(F(ϕa(Xu))−F(Xu))du, so that ∑aIa=∫[r,r′]Φudu, and note caGa=∫[r,r′]ga(u,Xr)(F(ϕa(Xr))−F(Xr))du. On Ω0∖B1 no counter jumps in (r,r′] (by (1a), Nr′a−Nra≤Y^ma=0), so as in Case 1 the path X is constant on [r,r′] and Ia=caGa. Both Ia and caGa are bounded by 2∥F∥m (by (P2)), so
E[caGa1D]−E[Ia1D]≤4∥F∥mP(B1)≤4∣A∣∥F∥m2.(1.5)
Combining (1.3), (1.4) summed over a, and (1.5) summed over a, and recalling m=Λδ, gives (1.1) with C=4∣A∣2(1+∣A∣)+∣A∣+4∣A∣2.
Step 2: summation over a partition (claim (a)). Let 0≤r<t≤T, D∈Fr, F:E→R, and let n≥1 be a natural number; put rk=r+k(t−r)/n for k∈{0,…,n}. Since (Fs) is a filtration, D∈Fr⊆Frk for every k, so Step 1 applies on each [rk,rk+1] with the same D and δ=(t−r)/n. Summing (1.1) over k, the left sides telescope, ∑kE[(F(Xrk+1)−F(Xrk))1D]=E[(F(Xt)−F(Xr))1D], while by (P2) ∑k∫[rk,rk+1]Φudu=∫[r,t]Φudu pointwise on Ω (the map u↦Φu(ω) is bounded and measurable, being a section of a product-measurable map by (P1)). Therefore
The left side does not depend on n; letting n→∞ shows it is 0, which is claim (a) for r<t. For r=t both sides of (a) are 0. The measurability assertion in (a) is (P1) with H(u,x)=∑aga(u,x)(F(ϕa(x))−F(x)).
where the last equality regroups the labels a according to y=ϕa(x): the labels with ϕa(x)=x contribute 0, and for y=x the labels with ϕa(x)=y contribute qu(x,y)(F(y)−F(x)), so the inner sum is ∑y=xqu(x,y)(F(y)−F(x))=LuF(x) as defined in Uniqueness for the Forward Equation of a Bounded Jump-Rate Family on a Finite Set. Claim (a) now reads μtD(F)=μrD(F)+∫[r,t]μuD(LuF)du, which is condition (ii).