TheoremBase

Proof of Forward Equation for a Finite-State Jump System Driven by Poisson Clocks with the Fresh-Start Property

lemmalem:poisson-clock-jump-system-forward-equation-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
Reason: Proof of the forward equation for a finite-state jump system driven by Poisson clocks with the fresh-start property.

Proof

Throughout, F=maxxEF(x)\|F\|=\max_{x\in E}|F(x)|, and linearity and monotonicity of the integral are used freely for bounded measurable integrands on compact intervals (such integrands are integrable, the interval having finite measure by claim 1 of Restricted Lebesgue Measure and Integral Toolkit on a Compact Interval), including the bound ff\bigl|\int f\bigr|\le\int|f| of claim 2 of that theorem. Natural numbers are as in Natural Numbers.

Preliminaries. (P1) Joint measurability. Let H:[0,T]×ERH:[0,T]\times E\to\mathbb{R} be bounded with uH(u,x)u\mapsto H(u,x) measurable on [0,T][0,T] for each xx. Then (u,ω)1Ω0(ω)H(u,Xu(ω))=xEH(u,x)1Ω0(ω)1{Xu(ω)=x}(u,\omega)\mapsto\mathbf{1}_{\Omega_0}(\omega)H(u,X_u(\omega))=\sum_{x\in E}H(u,x)\mathbf{1}_{\Omega_0}(\omega)\mathbf{1}\{X_u(\omega)=x\} is B[0,T]F\mathcal{B}_{[0,T]}\otimes\mathcal{F}-measurable, by (D3) and Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions, since (u,ω)H(u,x)(u,\omega)\mapsto H(u,x) is product-measurable (its preimages are rectangles S×ΩS\times\Omega with SB[0,T]S\in\mathcal{B}_{[0,T]}). For 0stT0\le s\le t\le T the integral over [s,t][s,t] of a bounded B[0,T]\mathcal{B}_{[0,T]}-measurable ff equals the integral over [0,T][0,T] of 1[s,t]f\mathbf{1}_{[s,t]}f, both being the integral over R\mathbb{R} of the same zero extension (claim 2 of Restricted Lebesgue Measure and Integral Toolkit on a Compact Interval), and (u,ω)1[s,t](u)(u,\omega)\mapsto\mathbf{1}_{[s,t]}(u) is product-measurable by the rectangle argument. Hence, by the Tonelli theorem on [0,T]×Ω[0,T]\times\Omega (applied to the positive and negative parts of 1[s,t](u)1Ω0H(u,Xu)\mathbf{1}_{[s,t]}(u)\mathbf{1}_{\Omega_0}H(u,X_u)), the map ω[s,t]1Ω0H(u,Xu)du\omega\mapsto\int_{[s,t]}\mathbf{1}_{\Omega_0}H(u,X_u)\,du is defined everywhere and F\mathcal{F}-measurable, and for every DFD\in\mathcal{F},

E[1D[s,t]1Ω0H(u,Xu)du]=[s,t]E[1D1Ω0H(u,Xu)]du,\mathbb{E}\Bigl[\mathbf{1}_D\int_{[s,t]}\mathbf{1}_{\Omega_0}H(u,X_u)\,du\Bigr]=\int_{[s,t]}\mathbb{E}\bigl[\mathbf{1}_D\mathbf{1}_{\Omega_0}H(u,X_u)\bigr]\,du,

the inner expectation being a measurable function of uu. (P2) Adjacent intervals. For a bounded B[0,T]\mathcal{B}_{[0,T]}-measurable ff and 0stT0\le s\le t\le T one has [0,t]fdu[0,s]fdu=[s,t]fdu\int_{[0,t]}f\,du-\int_{[0,s]}f\,du=\int_{[s,t]}f\,du and [s,t]fdu(ts)supf\bigl|\int_{[s,t]}f\,du\bigr|\le(t-s)\sup|f|: by claim 2 of Restricted Lebesgue Measure and Integral Toolkit on a Compact Interval each integral equals the integral over R\mathbb{R} of the corresponding zero extension, the zero extensions from [0,t][0,t] and [0,s][0,s] differ by the zero extension from (s,t](s,t], whose integral equals that of the zero extension from [s,t][s,t] because the two agree off the singleton {s}\{s\}, which has Lebesgue measure 00 (claim 6 of Restricted Lebesgue Measure and Integral Toolkit on a Compact Interval, applied on [s,t][s,t] with D=(s,t]D=(s,t], for s<ts<t); and [s,t][s,t] has measure tst-s (claim 1 of Restricted Lebesgue Measure and Integral Toolkit on a Compact Interval). In particular, for ωΩ0\omega\in\Omega_0, where (D4) expresses Tta(ω)\mathcal{T}^a_t(\omega) as the integral of the [0,Λ][0,\Lambda]-valued map uga(u,Xu(ω))u\mapsto g^a(u,X_u(\omega)), the path tTta(ω)t\mapsto\mathcal{T}^a_t(\omega) is nondecreasing and continuous with TtaTsaΛ(ts)\mathcal{T}^a_t-\mathcal{T}^a_s\le\Lambda(t-s). (P3) Counting paths. For a counting path cc with first jump time τ1(c)\tau_1(c) and s0s\ge0: c(s)1c(s)\ge1 if and only if τ1(c)s\tau_1(c)\le s, by monotonicity and right-continuity of cc (Counting Path and Its Jump Times; the set {t:c(t)1}\{t:c(t)\ge1\} is an interval unbounded above whose infimum it contains by right-continuity, or is empty).

Step 1: the one-step estimate. Fix 0r<rT0\le r<r'\le T, put δ=rr\delta=r'-r and m=Λδ\mathfrak{m}=\Lambda\delta, fix DFrD\in\mathfrak{F}_r and F:ERF:E\to\mathbb{R}, and write Y^a=Y^a,r\hat{Y}^a=\hat{Y}^{a,r} for the residual clocks of (H2); note m=Λ(rr)Λ(Tr)=ϱr\mathfrak{m}=\Lambda(r'-r)\le\Lambda(T-r)=\varrho_r, so all residual-clock values used below are at times in [0,ϱr][0,\varrho_r], where (H2) applies. Every residual path uY^ua(ω)u\mapsto\hat{Y}^a_u(\omega) is itself a counting path (it starts at 00 and inherits monotonicity, integer values, right-continuity and unit jumps from the counting path of YaY^a), so (P3) applies to it. Define the frozen consumptions and frozen increments

ca=[r,r]ga(u,Xr)du=xE1{Xr=x}[r,r]ga(u,x)du[0,m],Ga=F(ϕa(Xr))F(Xr),c^a=\int_{[r,r']}g^a(u,X_r)\,du=\sum_{x\in E}\mathbf{1}\{X_r=x\}\int_{[r,r']}g^a(u,x)\,du\in[0,\mathfrak{m}],\qquad G^a=F(\phi^a(X_r))-F(X_r),

both Fr\mathfrak{F}_r-measurable by (D3), with Ga2F|G^a|\le2\|F\|. Let B2={aY^ma2}B_2=\{\sum_a\hat{Y}^a_\mathfrak{m}\ge2\} and B1={aY^ma1}B_1=\{\sum_a\hat{Y}^a_\mathfrak{m}\ge1\}. For each aa let ξa=τ1(Y^a)[0,]\xi^a=\tau_1(\hat{Y}^a)\in[0,\infty] be the first jump time of the residual clock (++\infty if it never jumps) and let ζa=ξa\zeta^a=\xi^a on {ξam}\{\xi^a\le\mathfrak{m}\} and ζa=m+1\zeta^a=\mathfrak{m}+1 elsewhere. By (P3), {ζas}={Y^sa1}\{\zeta^a\le s\}=\{\hat{Y}^a_s\ge1\} for 0sm0\le s\le\mathfrak{m}, {ζas}={Y^ma1}\{\zeta^a\le s\}=\{\hat{Y}^a_{\mathfrak{m}}\ge1\} for m<s<m+1\mathfrak{m}<s<\mathfrak{m}+1, {ζas}=Ω\{\zeta^a\le s\}=\Omega for sm+1s\ge\mathfrak{m}+1, and {ζas}=\{\zeta^a\le s\}=\emptyset for s<0s<0; so ζa\zeta^a is a real random variable with σ(ζa)σ(Y^ua:0uϱr)\sigma(\zeta^a)\subseteq\sigma(\hat{Y}^a_u:0\le u\le\varrho_r), and, since camc^a\le\mathfrak{m}, the map 1{Y^caa1}=1{ζaca}\mathbf{1}\{\hat{Y}^a_{c^a}\ge1\}=\mathbf{1}\{\zeta^a\le c^a\} is F\mathcal{F}-measurable (Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions). Put Φu=1Ω0aga(u,Xu)(F(ϕa(Xu))F(Xu))\Phi_u=\mathbf{1}_{\Omega_0}\sum_{a}g^a(u,X_u)\bigl(F(\phi^a(X_u))-F(X_u)\bigr), the integrand of claim (a), which is of the form (P1) with Φu2AΛF|\Phi_u|\le2|\mathsf{A}|\Lambda\|F\|. We show

E[(F(Xr)F(Xr))1D]E[1D[r,r]Φudu]CFΛ2δ2,C=4A2(1+A)+A+4A2.(1.1)\Bigl|\mathbb{E}\bigl[(F(X_{r'})-F(X_r))\mathbf{1}_D\bigr]-\mathbb{E}\Bigl[\mathbf{1}_D\int_{[r,r']}\Phi_u\,du\Bigr]\Bigr|\le C\,\|F\|\,\Lambda^2\delta^2,\qquad C=4|\mathsf{A}|^2(1+|\mathsf{A}|)+|\mathsf{A}|+4|\mathsf{A}|^2 .\tag{1.1}

(1a) Pathwise identification on Ω0B2\Omega_0\setminus B_2. Fix ωΩ0\omega\in\Omega_0. For u[r,r]u\in[r,r'], (P2) gives 0TuaTram0\le\mathcal{T}^a_u-\mathcal{T}^a_r\le\mathfrak{m}, so NuaNra=Y^TuaTraaY^maN^a_u-N^a_r=\hat{Y}^a_{\mathcal{T}^a_u-\mathcal{T}^a_r}\le\hat{Y}^a_\mathfrak{m} by monotonicity of the counting path Y^a\hat{Y}^a. Now suppose also ωB2\omega\notin B_2, so that the grand total N=aNaN=\sum_aN^a, a nondecreasing path, satisfies NrNr1N_{r'}-N_r\le1. We claim

F(Xr)F(Xr)=aA1{Y^caa1}Gaon Ω0B2.(1.2)F(X_{r'})-F(X_r)=\sum_{a\in\mathsf{A}}\mathbf{1}\{\hat{Y}^a_{c^a}\ge1\}\,G^a\qquad\text{on }\Omega_0\setminus B_2.\tag{1.2}

Case 1: Nr=NrN_{r'}=N_r. Then NN is constant on [r,r][r,r'] by monotonicity, so Nu=NuN_u=N_{u-} for every u(r,r]u\in(r,r'], and by (H1) Xu=XuX_u=X_{u-} for every u(r,r]u\in(r,r']; since the path is constant on the constancy intervals of (H1) and takes the same value on both sides of each constancy-interval endpoint in (r,r](r,r'], it is constant on [r,r][r,r'], so F(Xr)F(Xr)=0F(X_{r'})-F(X_r)=0. Moreover the integrand of Ta\mathcal{T}^a equals ga(u,Xr)g^a(u,X_r) on [r,r][r,r'], so by (P2) TraTra=ca\mathcal{T}^a_{r'}-\mathcal{T}^a_r=c^a, whence Y^caa=NraNra=0\hat{Y}^a_{c^a}=N^a_{r'}-N^a_r=0 for every aa, and the right side of (1.2) vanishes too. Case 2: Nr=Nr+1N_{r'}=N_r+1. Put θ=inf{u(r,r]:Nu=Nr+1}\theta=\inf\{u\in(r,r']:N_u=N_r+1\}; by right-continuity of NN (each Nua=YTuaaN^a_u=Y^a_{\mathcal{T}^a_u} is right-continuous in uu, the counting path YaY^a being right-continuous and Ta\mathcal{T}^a continuous and nondecreasing by (P2)) Nθ=Nr+1N_\theta=N_r+1 and θ>r\theta>r, and by monotonicity Nu=NrN_u=N_r for u[r,θ)u\in[r,\theta), so Nθ=NrN_{\theta-}=N_r: thus Nθ=Nθ+1N_\theta=N_{\theta-}+1, and Nu=NuN_u=N_{u-} for every u(r,r]{θ}u\in(r,r']\setminus\{\theta\}. Since the increments NraNraN^a_{r'}-N^a_r are nonnegative integers with sum 11, exactly one label bb has NrbNrb=1N^b_{r'}-N^b_r=1, and bb is the unique label with NθbNθbN^b_\theta\neq N^b_{\theta-}. By (H1), Xu=XuX_u=X_{u-} for u(r,r]{θ}u\in(r,r']\setminus\{\theta\} and Xθ=ϕb(Xθ)X_\theta=\phi^b(X_{\theta-}); as in Case 1 the path is constant on [r,θ)[r,\theta) with value XrX_r, so Xθ=XrX_{\theta-}=X_r, and constant on [θ,r][\theta,r'] with value ϕb(Xr)\phi^b(X_r). Hence F(Xr)F(Xr)=GbF(X_{r'})-F(X_r)=G^b. For aba\neq b: Y^mbNrbNrb=1\hat{Y}^b_\mathfrak{m}\ge N^b_{r'}-N^b_r=1, so Y^ma=0\hat{Y}^a_\mathfrak{m}=0 (as ωB2\omega\notin B_2), and Y^caa=0\hat{Y}^a_{c^a}=0 since camc^a\le\mathfrak{m}. For bb: on [r,θ)[r,\theta) the integrand of Tb\mathcal{T}^b equals gb(u,Xr)g^b(u,X_r), so by (P2) and claim 6 of Restricted Lebesgue Measure and Integral Toolkit on a Compact Interval (the two integrands agree on the co-null set [r,θ)[r,\theta) of [r,θ][r,\theta]) TθbTrb=[r,θ]gb(u,Xr)ducb\mathcal{T}^b_\theta-\mathcal{T}^b_r=\int_{[r,\theta]}g^b(u,X_r)\,du\le c^b, the inequality by monotonicity of the integral and (P2), the integrand being nonnegative; and NθbNrb1N^b_\theta-N^b_r\ge1 gives Y^TθbTrbb1\hat{Y}^b_{\mathcal{T}^b_\theta-\mathcal{T}^b_r}\ge1, hence Y^cbb1\hat{Y}^b_{c^b}\ge1 by monotonicity. Thus the right side of (1.2) equals GbG^b, proving (1.2).

(1b) Probability of B2B_2 and B1B_1. By (H2), Y^ma=Y^maY^0a\hat{Y}^a_\mathfrak{m}=\hat{Y}^a_\mathfrak{m}-\hat{Y}^a_0 has the Poisson distribution with parameter m\mathfrak{m} (for m>0\mathfrak{m}>0 by the increment assertion of (H2) with p=1p=1; for m=0\mathfrak{m}=0 because Y^0a=0\hat{Y}^a_0=0, the residual paths being counting paths, and the Poisson distribution with parameter 00 is the unit mass at 00), so E[Y^ma]=m\mathbb{E}[\hat{Y}^a_\mathfrak{m}]=\mathfrak{m} and E[Y^ma(Y^ma1)]=m2\mathbb{E}[\hat{Y}^a_\mathfrak{m}(\hat{Y}^a_\mathfrak{m}-1)]=\mathfrak{m}^2 by Factorial Moments and Moments of Every Order of the Poisson Distribution(a) with p=1p=1 and p=2p=2. Since Y^ma(Y^ma1)0\hat{Y}^a_\mathfrak{m}(\hat{Y}^a_\mathfrak{m}-1)\ge0 is at least 22 on {Y^ma2}\{\hat{Y}^a_\mathfrak{m}\ge2\}, Markov's inequality gives P(Y^ma2)m2/2P(\hat{Y}^a_\mathfrak{m}\ge2)\le\mathfrak{m}^2/2 and P(Y^ma1)mP(\hat{Y}^a_\mathfrak{m}\ge1)\le\mathfrak{m}. For aba\neq b the events {Y^ma1}\{\hat{Y}^a_\mathfrak{m}\ge1\} and {Y^mb1}\{\hat{Y}^b_\mathfrak{m}\ge1\} are independent by (H2), so their intersection has probability at most m2\mathfrak{m}^2. As B2a{Y^ma2}ab({Y^ma1}{Y^mb1})B_2\subseteq\bigcup_a\{\hat{Y}^a_\mathfrak{m}\ge2\}\cup\bigcup_{a\neq b}(\{\hat{Y}^a_\mathfrak{m}\ge1\}\cap\{\hat{Y}^b_\mathfrak{m}\ge1\}) and B1a{Y^ma1}B_1\subseteq\bigcup_a\{\hat{Y}^a_\mathfrak{m}\ge1\}, subadditivity (claim 4 of Basic Properties of a Measure, applied to the finite unions padded with empty sets) gives

P(B2)Am2/2+A2m22A2m2,P(B1)Am.P(B_2)\le|\mathsf{A}|\mathfrak{m}^2/2+|\mathsf{A}|^2\mathfrak{m}^2\le2|\mathsf{A}|^2\mathfrak{m}^2,\qquad P(B_1)\le|\mathsf{A}|\mathfrak{m} .

Taking expectations in (1.2) (both sides are bounded, by 2F2\|F\| and 2AF2|\mathsf{A}|\|F\|, and agree off B2(ΩΩ0)B_2\cup(\Omega\setminus\Omega_0), a set of probability at most P(B2)P(B_2)),

E[(F(Xr)F(Xr))1D]aE[1{Y^caa1}Ga1D]2(1+A)F2A2m2.(1.3)\Bigl|\mathbb{E}\bigl[(F(X_{r'})-F(X_r))\mathbf{1}_D\bigr]-\sum_a\mathbb{E}\bigl[\mathbf{1}\{\hat{Y}^a_{c^a}\ge1\}G^a\mathbf{1}_D\bigr]\Bigr|\le2(1+|\mathsf{A}|)\|F\|\cdot2|\mathsf{A}|^2\mathfrak{m}^2 .\tag{1.3}

(1c) Freezing the clock reading. Fix aa. The random variable ζa\zeta^a introduced above satisfies σ(ζa)σ(Y^ua:0uϱr)\sigma(\zeta^a)\subseteq\sigma(\hat{Y}^a_u:0\le u\le\varrho_r) (as recorded there), hence σ(ζa)\sigma(\zeta^a) is independent of Fr\mathfrak{F}_r by (H2), and 1{Y^caa1}=1{ζaca}\mathbf{1}\{\hat{Y}^a_{c^a}\ge1\}=\mathbf{1}\{\zeta^a\le c^a\}. Write Ga=Ga,+Ga,G^a=G^{a,+}-G^{a,-} with Ga,±0G^{a,\pm}\ge0 bounded and Fr\mathfrak{F}_r-measurable, and for ±\pm fixed put Ψ(ω,v)=1{vca(ω)}Ga,±(ω)1D(ω)\Psi(\omega,v)=\mathbf{1}\{v\le c^a(\omega)\}G^{a,\pm}(\omega)\mathbf{1}_D(\omega) for vRv\in\mathbb{R}; Ψ\Psi is FrB\mathfrak{F}_r\otimes\mathcal{B}-measurable (B\mathcal{B} the Borel σ\sigma-algebra), since (ω,v)ca(ω)v(\omega,v)\mapsto c^a(\omega)-v is product-measurable by Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions. Independence Fubini (claim 3, with G=Fr\mathcal{G}=\mathfrak{F}_r and the independent variable ζa\zeta^a) gives

E[1{ζaca}Ga,±1D]=E[ψa(ca)Ga,±1D],ψa(s)=P(ζas)=P(Y^sa1)(0sm).\mathbb{E}\bigl[\mathbf{1}\{\zeta^a\le c^a\}G^{a,\pm}\mathbf{1}_D\bigr]=\mathbb{E}\bigl[\psi^a(c^a)\,G^{a,\pm}\mathbf{1}_D\bigr],\qquad \psi^a(s)=P(\zeta^a\le s)=P(\hat{Y}^a_s\ge1)\quad(0\le s\le\mathfrak{m}).

Subtracting the two signs, E[1{Y^caa1}Ga1D]=E[ψa(ca)Ga1D]\mathbb{E}[\mathbf{1}\{\hat{Y}^a_{c^a}\ge1\}G^a\mathbf{1}_D]=\mathbb{E}[\psi^a(c^a)G^a\mathbf{1}_D]. Now for 0sm0\le s\le\mathfrak{m}, Y^sa\hat{Y}^a_s is Poisson with parameter ss (as above, including s=0s=0), and for an integer y0y\ge0 one has y1{y1}=max(y1,0)y(y1)/2y-\mathbf{1}\{y\ge1\}=\max(y-1,0)\le y(y-1)/2 (both sides vanish for y{0,1}y\in\{0,1\}, and y1y(y1)/2y-1\le y(y-1)/2 for y2y\ge2), so

0sψa(s)=E[Y^sa1{Y^sa1}]12E[Y^sa(Y^sa1)]=s2/2,0\le s-\psi^a(s)=\mathbb{E}\bigl[\hat{Y}^a_s-\mathbf{1}\{\hat{Y}^a_s\ge1\}\bigr]\le\tfrac12\mathbb{E}\bigl[\hat{Y}^a_s(\hat{Y}^a_s-1)\bigr]=s^2/2 ,

again by Factorial Moments and Moments of Every Order of the Poisson Distribution(a). Hence ψa(ca)cam2/2|\psi^a(c^a)-c^a|\le\mathfrak{m}^2/2 everywhere, and

E[1{Y^caa1}Ga1D]E[caGa1D]Fm2.(1.4)\Bigl|\mathbb{E}\bigl[\mathbf{1}\{\hat{Y}^a_{c^a}\ge1\}G^a\mathbf{1}_D\bigr]-\mathbb{E}\bigl[c^aG^a\mathbf{1}_D\bigr]\Bigr|\le\|F\|\mathfrak{m}^2 .\tag{1.4}

(1d) Unfreezing the state. Put Ia=[r,r]1Ω0ga(u,Xu)(F(ϕa(Xu))F(Xu))duI^a=\int_{[r,r']}\mathbf{1}_{\Omega_0}g^a(u,X_u)\bigl(F(\phi^a(X_u))-F(X_u)\bigr)\,du, so that aIa=[r,r]Φudu\sum_aI^a=\int_{[r,r']}\Phi_u\,du, and note caGa=[r,r]ga(u,Xr)(F(ϕa(Xr))F(Xr))duc^aG^a=\int_{[r,r']}g^a(u,X_r)\bigl(F(\phi^a(X_r))-F(X_r)\bigr)\,du. On Ω0B1\Omega_0\setminus B_1 no counter jumps in (r,r](r,r'] (by (1a), NraNraY^ma=0N^a_{r'}-N^a_r\le\hat{Y}^a_\mathfrak{m}=0), so as in Case 1 the path XX is constant on [r,r][r,r'] and Ia=caGaI^a=c^aG^a. Both IaI^a and caGac^aG^a are bounded by 2Fm2\|F\|\mathfrak{m} (by (P2)), so

E[caGa1D]E[Ia1D]4FmP(B1)4AFm2.(1.5)\Bigl|\mathbb{E}\bigl[c^aG^a\mathbf{1}_D\bigr]-\mathbb{E}\bigl[I^a\mathbf{1}_D\bigr]\Bigr|\le4\|F\|\mathfrak{m}\,P(B_1)\le4|\mathsf{A}|\,\|F\|\mathfrak{m}^2 .\tag{1.5}

Combining (1.3), (1.4) summed over aa, and (1.5) summed over aa, and recalling m=Λδ\mathfrak{m}=\Lambda\delta, gives (1.1) with C=4A2(1+A)+A+4A2C=4|\mathsf{A}|^2(1+|\mathsf{A}|)+|\mathsf{A}|+4|\mathsf{A}|^2.

Step 2: summation over a partition (claim (a)). Let 0r<tT0\le r<t\le T, DFrD\in\mathfrak{F}_r, F:ERF:E\to\mathbb{R}, and let n1n\ge1 be a natural number; put rk=r+k(tr)/nr_k=r+k(t-r)/n for k{0,,n}k\in\{0,\dots,n\}. Since (Fs)(\mathfrak{F}_s) is a filtration, DFrFrkD\in\mathfrak{F}_r\subseteq\mathfrak{F}_{r_k} for every kk, so Step 1 applies on each [rk,rk+1][r_k,r_{k+1}] with the same DD and δ=(tr)/n\delta=(t-r)/n. Summing (1.1) over kk, the left sides telescope, kE[(F(Xrk+1)F(Xrk))1D]=E[(F(Xt)F(Xr))1D]\sum_k\mathbb{E}[(F(X_{r_{k+1}})-F(X_{r_k}))\mathbf{1}_D]=\mathbb{E}[(F(X_t)-F(X_r))\mathbf{1}_D], while by (P2) k[rk,rk+1]Φudu=[r,t]Φudu\sum_k\int_{[r_k,r_{k+1}]}\Phi_u\,du=\int_{[r,t]}\Phi_u\,du pointwise on Ω\Omega (the map uΦu(ω)u\mapsto\Phi_u(\omega) is bounded and measurable, being a section of a product-measurable map by (P1)). Therefore

E[(F(Xt)F(Xr))1D]E[1D[r,t]Φudu]nCFΛ2(tr)2n2=CFΛ2(tr)2n.\Bigl|\mathbb{E}\bigl[(F(X_t)-F(X_r))\mathbf{1}_D\bigr]-\mathbb{E}\Bigl[\mathbf{1}_D\int_{[r,t]}\Phi_u\,du\Bigr]\Bigr|\le n\cdot C\|F\|\Lambda^2\frac{(t-r)^2}{n^2}=\frac{C\|F\|\Lambda^2(t-r)^2}{n}.

The left side does not depend on nn; letting nn\to\infty shows it is 00, which is claim (a) for r<tr<t. For r=tr=t both sides of (a) are 00. The measurability assertion in (a) is (P1) with H(u,x)=aga(u,x)(F(ϕa(x))F(x))H(u,x)=\sum_ag^a(u,x)(F(\phi^a(x))-F(x)).

Step 3: claim (b). Fix r[0,T)r\in[0,T) and DFrD\in\mathfrak{F}_r. For xyx\neq y the map uqu(x,y)u\mapsto q_u(x,y) is a finite sum of the measurable maps uga(u,x)u\mapsto g^a(u,x), hence measurable (Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions), and yxqu(x,y)aga(u,x)AΛ\sum_{y\neq x}q_u(x,y)\le\sum_ag^a(u,x)\le|\mathsf{A}|\Lambda, each aa contributing to at most one yy. Since P(Ω0)=1P(\Omega_0)=1, μuD(x)=E[1D1Ω01{Xu=x}]\mu^D_u(x)=\mathbb{E}[\mathbf{1}_D\mathbf{1}_{\Omega_0}\mathbf{1}\{X_u=x\}], which is a measurable function of u[0,T]u\in[0,T] with values in [0,1][0,1] by (P1) (with H(u,x)=1{x=x}H(u,x')=\mathbf{1}\{x'=x\}); restricted to [r,T][r,T] it is measurable for B[r,T]\mathcal{B}_{[r,T]}, the preimages being intersections of members of B[0,T]\mathcal{B}_{[0,T]} with [r,T][r,T]. This is condition (i) of Uniqueness for the Forward Equation of a Bounded Jump-Rate Family on a Finite Set. For condition (ii), let F:ERF:E\to\mathbb{R} and t[r,T]t\in[r,T]. Then E[F(Xt)1D]=xF(x)P(D{Xt=x})=μtD(F)\mathbb{E}[F(X_t)\mathbf{1}_D]=\sum_xF(x)P(D\cap\{X_t=x\})=\mu^D_t(F) with the pairing μ(F)=xμ(x)F(x)\mu(F)=\sum_x\mu(x)F(x) of Uniqueness for the Forward Equation of a Bounded Jump-Rate Family on a Finite Set, and likewise at time rr; and by (P1),

E[1D[r,t]Φudu]=[r,t]E[1DΦu]du=[r,t]xEμuD(x)aAga(u,x)(F(ϕa(x))F(x))du=[r,t]μuD(LuF)du,\mathbb{E}\Bigl[\mathbf{1}_D\int_{[r,t]}\Phi_u\,du\Bigr]=\int_{[r,t]}\mathbb{E}\bigl[\mathbf{1}_D\Phi_u\bigr]\,du=\int_{[r,t]}\sum_{x\in E}\mu^D_u(x)\sum_{a\in\mathsf{A}}g^a(u,x)\bigl(F(\phi^a(x))-F(x)\bigr)\,du=\int_{[r,t]}\mu^D_u(\mathcal{L}_uF)\,du,

where the last equality regroups the labels aa according to y=ϕa(x)y=\phi^a(x): the labels with ϕa(x)=x\phi^a(x)=x contribute 00, and for yxy\neq x the labels with ϕa(x)=y\phi^a(x)=y contribute qu(x,y)(F(y)F(x))q_u(x,y)(F(y)-F(x)), so the inner sum is yxqu(x,y)(F(y)F(x))=LuF(x)\sum_{y\neq x}q_u(x,y)(F(y)-F(x))=\mathcal{L}_uF(x) as defined in Uniqueness for the Forward Equation of a Bounded Jump-Rate Family on a Finite Set. Claim (a) now reads μtD(F)=μrD(F)+[r,t]μuD(LuF)du\mu^D_t(F)=\mu^D_r(F)+\int_{[r,t]}\mu^D_u(\mathcal{L}_uF)\,du, which is condition (ii).

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Comments

Loading…