Absolute values are those of that definition , with the properties collected in Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field ; the order arithmetic used below is that of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field , and 2 2 2 denotes 1 + 1 1+1 1 + 1 .
Proof of claim 1. Write a = g ( x 0 ) a=g(x_{0}) a = g ( x 0 β ) , L = g β² ( x 0 ) L=g'(x_{0}) L = g β² ( x 0 β ) and A = β£ a β£ A=|a| A = β£ a β£ . Since a β 0 a\ne 0 a ξ = 0 , claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field gives 0 β€ A 0\le A 0 β€ A and A β 0 A\ne 0 A ξ = 0 , hence 0 < A 0<A 0 < A ; in particular a β 1 a^{-1} a β 1 and A β 1 A^{-1} A β 1 exist and are positive by claim 7 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field . Also β£ 1 β£ = 1 |1|=1 β£1β£ = 1 : by claim 1 of the absolute value lemma β£ 1 β£ |1| β£1β£ is 1 1 1 or β 1 -1 β 1 , and β£ 1 β£ = β 1 |1|=-1 β£1β£ = β 1 would give 0 β€ β 1 0\le -1 0 β€ β 1 and hence 1 β€ 0 1\le 0 1 β€ 0 by claim 4 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field , contradicting claim 6 there. Consequently, for every w β 0 w\ne 0 w ξ = 0 , multiplicativity (claim 4 of the absolute value lemma) gives β£ w β£ β β£ w β 1 β£ = β£ w β w β 1 β£ = β£ 1 β£ = 1 |w|\,|w^{-1}|=|w\,w^{-1}|=|1|=1 β£ w β£ β£ w β 1 β£ = β£ w w β 1 β£ = β£1β£ = 1 , so β£ w β 1 β£ = β£ w β£ β 1 |w^{-1}|=|w|^{-1} β£ w β 1 β£ = β£ w β£ β 1 .
For h β R h\in\mathbb{R} h β R with h β 0 h\ne 0 h ξ = 0 and x 0 + h β I x_{0}+h\in I x 0 β + h β I put b h = g ( x 0 + h ) b_{h}=g(x_{0}+h) b h β = g ( x 0 β + h ) and
Q ( h ) = g ( x 0 + h ) β g ( x 0 ) h , R ( h ) = ( 1 / g ) ( x 0 + h ) β ( 1 / g ) ( x 0 ) h . Q(h)=\frac{g(x_{0}+h)-g(x_{0})}{h},\qquad R(h)=\frac{(1/g)(x_{0}+h)-(1/g)(x_{0})}{h}. Q ( h ) = h g ( x 0 β + h ) β g ( x 0 β ) β , R ( h ) = h ( 1/ g ) ( x 0 β + h ) β ( 1/ g ) ( x 0 β ) β .
By hypothesis b h β 0 b_{h}\ne 0 b h β ξ = 0 , and b h β a = h β Q ( h ) b_{h}-a=h\,Q(h) b h β β a = h Q ( h ) .
Step 1 (an algebraic identity). Expanding, a β 1 b h β 1 ( a β b h ) = b h β 1 β a β 1 a^{-1}b_{h}^{-1}(a-b_{h})=b_{h}^{-1}-a^{-1} a β 1 b h β 1 β ( a β b h β ) = b h β 1 β β a β 1 , so
R ( h ) = h β 1 ( b h β 1 β a β 1 ) = β a β 1 b h β 1 β b h β a h = β a β 1 b h β 1 Q ( h ) . R(h)=h^{-1}\bigl(b_{h}^{-1}-a^{-1}\bigr)=-a^{-1}b_{h}^{-1}\,\frac{b_{h}-a}{h}=-a^{-1}b_{h}^{-1}Q(h). R ( h ) = h β 1 ( b h β 1 β β a β 1 ) = β a β 1 b h β 1 β h b h β β a β = β a β 1 b h β 1 β Q ( h ) .
Since a β 1 b h β 1 β
b h a β 1 L = L ( a β 1 ) 2 a^{-1}b_{h}^{-1}\cdot b_{h}a^{-1}L=L\bigl(a^{-1}\bigr)^{2} a β 1 b h β 1 β β
b h β a β 1 L = L ( a β 1 ) 2 , it follows that
R ( h ) + L ( a β 1 ) 2 = a β 1 b h β 1 ( β Q ( h ) + b h a β 1 L ) , R(h)+L\bigl(a^{-1}\bigr)^{2}=a^{-1}b_{h}^{-1}\Bigl(-Q(h)+b_{h}a^{-1}L\Bigr), R ( h ) + L ( a β 1 ) 2 = a β 1 b h β 1 β ( β Q ( h ) + b h β a β 1 L ) ,
and a direct expansion gives
β Q ( h ) + b h a β 1 L = β ( Q ( h ) β L ) + a β 1 β ( b h β a ) β L . -Q(h)+b_{h}a^{-1}L=-\bigl(Q(h)-L\bigr)+a^{-1}\,(b_{h}-a)\,L. β Q ( h ) + b h β a β 1 L = β ( Q ( h ) β L ) + a β 1 ( b h β β a ) L .
Hence, by the triangle inequality and multiplicativity of the absolute value (claims 5 and 4 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field ) together with claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field ,
β£ R ( h ) + L ( a β 1 ) 2 β£ β€ A β 1 β£ b h β£ β 1 ( β£ Q ( h ) β L β£ + A β 1 β£ b h β a β£ β β£ L β£ ) . \bigl|R(h)+L(a^{-1})^{2}\bigr|\le A^{-1}|b_{h}|^{-1}\Bigl(\bigl|Q(h)-L\bigr|+A^{-1}\bigl|b_{h}-a\bigr|\,|L|\Bigr). β R ( h ) + L ( a β 1 ) 2 β β€ A β 1 β£ b h β β£ β 1 ( β Q ( h ) β L β + A β 1 β b h β β a β β£ L β£ ) .
We refer to this as the basic estimate .
Step 2 (a crude bound on b h b_{h} b h β ). Applying Derivative at an Interior Point to g g g with Ξ΅ = 1 \varepsilon=1 Ξ΅ = 1 , there is Ξ΄ 1 > 0 \delta_{1}>0 Ξ΄ 1 β > 0 such that β£ Q ( h ) β L β£ < 1 |Q(h)-L|<1 β£ Q ( h ) β L β£ < 1 whenever 0 < β£ h β£ < Ξ΄ 1 0<|h|<\delta_{1} 0 < β£ h β£ < Ξ΄ 1 β and x 0 + h β I x_{0}+h\in I x 0 β + h β I . For such h h h , claim 5 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field gives
β£ Q ( h ) β£ = β£ ( Q ( h ) β L ) + L β£ β€ β£ Q ( h ) β L β£ + β£ L β£ < 1 + β£ L β£ . |Q(h)|=\bigl|\bigl(Q(h)-L\bigr)+L\bigr|\le|Q(h)-L|+|L|<1+|L|. β£ Q ( h ) β£ = β ( Q ( h ) β L ) + L β β€ β£ Q ( h ) β L β£ + β£ L β£ < 1 + β£ L β£.
Put ΞΊ = 1 + β£ L β£ \kappa=1+|L| ΞΊ = 1 + β£ L β£ ; then 0 < ΞΊ 0<\kappa 0 < ΞΊ by claims 6 and 3 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field . Since b h β a = h Q ( h ) b_{h}-a=hQ(h) b h β β a = h Q ( h ) , multiplicativity and claim 10 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field give
β£ b h β a β£ = β£ h β£ β β£ Q ( h ) β£ < β£ h β£ β ΞΊ . |b_{h}-a|=|h|\,|Q(h)|<|h|\,\kappa . β£ b h β β a β£ = β£ h β£ β£ Q ( h ) β£ < β£ h β£ ΞΊ .
Step 3 (choice of Ξ΄ \delta Ξ΄ ). Let Ξ΅ > 0 \varepsilon>0 Ξ΅ > 0 be given. Put
C = ( 2 A β 1 ) A β 1 ( 1 + A β 1 β£ L β£ ) , C=\bigl(2A^{-1}\bigr)A^{-1}\bigl(1+A^{-1}|L|\bigr), C = ( 2 A β 1 ) A β 1 ( 1 + A β 1 β£ L β£ ) ,
which is positive by claims 5, 6, 7 and 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and claim 2 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field , and put Ξ· = Ξ΅ C β 1 \eta=\varepsilon C^{-1} Ξ· = Ξ΅ C β 1 , so that 0 < Ξ· 0<\eta 0 < Ξ· and Ξ· C = Ξ΅ \eta C=\varepsilon Ξ· C = Ξ΅ . Let ΞΌ \mu ΞΌ be the smaller of Ξ· \eta Ξ· and A β
2 β 1 A\cdot 2^{-1} A β
2 β 1 (claim 9 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field ); then 0 < ΞΌ 0<\mu 0 < ΞΌ by claim 8 there. Now choose Ξ΄ 1 > 0 \delta_{1}>0 Ξ΄ 1 β > 0 as in Step 2; put Ξ΄ 2 = ΞΌ ΞΊ β 1 > 0 \delta_{2}=\mu\kappa^{-1}>0 Ξ΄ 2 β = ΞΌ ΞΊ β 1 > 0 , so that Ξ΄ 2 ΞΊ = ΞΌ \delta_{2}\kappa=\mu Ξ΄ 2 β ΞΊ = ΞΌ ; and choose Ξ΄ 3 > 0 \delta_{3}>0 Ξ΄ 3 β > 0 such that β£ Q ( h ) β L β£ < Ξ· |Q(h)-L|<\eta β£ Q ( h ) β L β£ < Ξ· whenever 0 < β£ h β£ < Ξ΄ 3 0<|h|<\delta_{3} 0 < β£ h β£ < Ξ΄ 3 β and x 0 + h β I x_{0}+h\in I x 0 β + h β I , which exists by the differentiability of g g g at x 0 x_{0} x 0 β . Let Ξ΄ > 0 \delta>0 Ξ΄ > 0 be the smallest of Ξ΄ 1 , Ξ΄ 2 , Ξ΄ 3 \delta_{1},\delta_{2},\delta_{3} Ξ΄ 1 β , Ξ΄ 2 β , Ξ΄ 3 β (claim 9 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field , used twice).
Step 4 (the estimate). Let h β R h\in\mathbb{R} h β R satisfy 0 < β£ h β£ < Ξ΄ 0<|h|<\delta 0 < β£ h β£ < Ξ΄ and x 0 + h β I x_{0}+h\in I x 0 β + h β I . By Step 2 and claim 10 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field ,
β£ b h β a β£ < β£ h β£ β ΞΊ < Ξ΄ 2 ΞΊ = ΞΌ , |b_{h}-a|<|h|\,\kappa<\delta_{2}\kappa=\mu , β£ b h β β a β£ < β£ h β£ ΞΊ < Ξ΄ 2 β ΞΊ = ΞΌ ,
so β£ b h β a β£ < Ξ· |b_{h}-a|<\eta β£ b h β β a β£ < Ξ· and β£ b h β a β£ < A β
2 β 1 |b_{h}-a|<A\cdot 2^{-1} β£ b h β β a β£ < A β
2 β 1 . By claims 3 and 7 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field ,
A β β£ b h β£ β€ β£ β β£ a β£ β β£ b h β£ β β£ β€ β£ a β b h β£ = β£ b h β a β£ < A β
2 β 1 , A-|b_{h}|\le\bigl|\,|a|-|b_{h}|\,\bigr|\le|a-b_{h}|=|b_{h}-a|<A\cdot 2^{-1}, A β β£ b h β β£ β€ β β£ a β£ β β£ b h β β£ β β€ β£ a β b h β β£ = β£ b h β β a β£ < A β
2 β 1 ,
and since A β
2 β 1 + A β
2 β 1 = A A\cdot 2^{-1}+A\cdot 2^{-1}=A A β
2 β 1 + A β
2 β 1 = A (claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field ), claim 1 there gives A β
2 β 1 < β£ b h β£ A\cdot 2^{-1}<|b_{h}| A β
2 β 1 < β£ b h β β£ . Multiplying this strict inequality by the positive element β£ b h β£ β 1 ( 2 A β 1 ) |b_{h}|^{-1}\bigl(2A^{-1}\bigr) β£ b h β β£ β 1 ( 2 A β 1 ) (claims 5, 7 and 10 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field ) yields
β£ b h β£ β 1 < 2 A β 1 . |b_{h}|^{-1}<2A^{-1}. β£ b h β β£ β 1 < 2 A β 1 .
By the choice of Ξ΄ 3 \delta_{3} Ξ΄ 3 β we also have β£ Q ( h ) β L β£ < Ξ· |Q(h)-L|<\eta β£ Q ( h ) β L β£ < Ξ· , and A β 1 β£ b h β a β£ β β£ L β£ β€ A β 1 Ξ· β β£ L β£ A^{-1}|b_{h}-a|\,|L|\le A^{-1}\eta\,|L| A β 1 β£ b h β β a β£ β£ L β£ β€ A β 1 Ξ· β£ L β£ by claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field . Adding these (claim 3 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field ),
β£ Q ( h ) β L β£ + A β 1 β£ b h β a β£ β β£ L β£ < Ξ· + A β 1 Ξ· β£ L β£ = Ξ· ( 1 + A β 1 β£ L β£ ) . \bigl|Q(h)-L\bigr|+A^{-1}\bigl|b_{h}-a\bigr|\,|L|<\eta+A^{-1}\eta|L|=\eta\bigl(1+A^{-1}|L|\bigr). β Q ( h ) β L β + A β 1 β b h β β a β β£ L β£ < Ξ· + A β 1 Ξ· β£ L β£ = Ξ· ( 1 + A β 1 β£ L β£ ) .
Write X = β£ b h β£ β 1 X=|b_{h}|^{-1} X = β£ b h β β£ β 1 , X β² = 2 A β 1 X'=2A^{-1} X β² = 2 A β 1 , Y = β£ Q ( h ) β L β£ + A β 1 β£ b h β a β£ β£ L β£ Y=|Q(h)-L|+A^{-1}|b_{h}-a||L| Y = β£ Q ( h ) β L β£ + A β 1 β£ b h β β a β£β£ L β£ and Y β² = Ξ· ( 1 + A β 1 β£ L β£ ) Y'=\eta(1+A^{-1}|L|) Y β² = Ξ· ( 1 + A β 1 β£ L β£ ) ; then 0 β€ X 0\le X 0 β€ X , 0 β€ Y 0\le Y 0 β€ Y , X < X β² X<X' X < X β² , Y < Y β² Y<Y' Y < Y β² and 0 < X β² 0<X' 0 < X β² , 0 < Y β² 0<Y' 0 < Y β² . If 0 < Y 0<Y 0 < Y then X Y < X β² Y < X β² Y β² XY<X'Y<X'Y' X Y < X β² Y < X β² Y β² by claim 10 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field ; if Y = 0 Y=0 Y = 0 then X Y = 0 < X β² Y β² XY=0<X'Y' X Y = 0 < X β² Y β² by claim 5 there. In either case X Y < X β² Y β² XY<X'Y' X Y < X β² Y β² , and multiplying by the positive element A β 1 A^{-1} A β 1 gives A β 1 X Y < A β 1 X β² Y β² A^{-1}XY<A^{-1}X'Y' A β 1 X Y < A β 1 X β² Y β² . Combining with the basic estimate of Step 1 and claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field ,
β£ R ( h ) + L ( a β 1 ) 2 β£ β€ A β 1 X Y < A β 1 ( 2 A β 1 ) Ξ· ( 1 + A β 1 β£ L β£ ) = Ξ· C = Ξ΅ . \bigl|R(h)+L(a^{-1})^{2}\bigr|\le A^{-1}XY<A^{-1}\bigl(2A^{-1}\bigr)\eta\bigl(1+A^{-1}|L|\bigr)=\eta C=\varepsilon . β R ( h ) + L ( a β 1 ) 2 β β€ A β 1 X Y < A β 1 ( 2 A β 1 ) Ξ· ( 1 + A β 1 β£ L β£ ) = Ξ· C = Ξ΅ .
Since Ξ΅ > 0 \varepsilon>0 Ξ΅ > 0 was arbitrary, Derivative at an Interior Point shows that 1 / g 1/g 1/ g is differentiable at x 0 x_{0} x 0 β with derivative β L ( a β 1 ) 2 = β g β² ( x 0 ) ( g ( x 0 ) β 1 ) 2 -L\bigl(a^{-1}\bigr)^{2}=-g'(x_{0})\bigl(g(x_{0})^{-1}\bigr)^{2} β L ( a β 1 ) 2 = β g β² ( x 0 β ) ( g ( x 0 β ) β 1 ) 2 , as claimed.
Proof of claim 2. Let e : I β R e:I\to\mathbb{R} e : I β R be given by e ( z ) = z e(z)=z e ( z ) = z . By claim 1 of Properties of Natural Number Powers in a Field we have z 1 = z z^{1}=z z 1 = z for the natural number powers of R \mathbb{R} R , so e e e is the restriction to I I I of the map x β¦ x 1 x\mapsto x^{1} x β¦ x 1 ; by claim 1 of Derivative of a Polynomial Function on the Real Line , e e e is differentiable at x 0 x_{0} x 0 β with e β² ( x 0 ) = 1 e'(x_{0})=1 e β² ( x 0 β ) = 1 . Since 0 β I 0\notin I 0 β / I we have e ( z ) = z β 0 e(z)=z\ne 0 e ( z ) = z ξ = 0 for every z β I z\in I z β I , and the function 1 / e 1/e 1/ e of claim 1 is exactly r r r . Claim 1 therefore applies and gives that r r r is differentiable at x 0 x_{0} x 0 β with
r β² ( x 0 ) = β 1 β
( x 0 β 1 ) 2 = β ( x 0 β 1 ) 2 . β r'(x_{0})=-1\cdot\bigl(x_{0}^{-1}\bigr)^{2}=-\bigl(x_{0}^{-1}\bigr)^{2}. \qquad\blacksquare r β² ( x 0 β ) = β 1 β
( x 0 β 1 β ) 2 = β ( x 0 β 1 β ) 2 . β