TheoremBase

Proof of Reciprocal Rule for One-Dimensional Derivatives

lemmalem:reciprocal-derivative-1d-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v1Aaron Β·
Verified by 0 users Β· Flagged by 0 users
Reason: Epsilon-delta proof of the reciprocal rule and of the derivative of the reciprocal map.

Proof

Absolute values are those of that definition, with the properties collected in Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field; the order arithmetic used below is that of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, and 22 denotes 1+11+1.

Proof of claim 1. Write a=g(x0)a=g(x_{0}), L=gβ€²(x0)L=g'(x_{0}) and A=∣a∣A=|a|. Since aβ‰ 0a\ne 0, claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field gives 0≀A0\le A and Aβ‰ 0A\ne 0, hence 0<A0<A; in particular aβˆ’1a^{-1} and Aβˆ’1A^{-1} exist and are positive by claim 7 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. Also ∣1∣=1|1|=1: by claim 1 of the absolute value lemma ∣1∣|1| is 11 or βˆ’1-1, and ∣1∣=βˆ’1|1|=-1 would give 0β‰€βˆ’10\le -1 and hence 1≀01\le 0 by claim 4 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, contradicting claim 6 there. Consequently, for every wβ‰ 0w\ne 0, multiplicativity (claim 4 of the absolute value lemma) gives ∣wβˆ£β€‰βˆ£wβˆ’1∣=∣w wβˆ’1∣=∣1∣=1|w|\,|w^{-1}|=|w\,w^{-1}|=|1|=1, so ∣wβˆ’1∣=∣wβˆ£βˆ’1|w^{-1}|=|w|^{-1}.

For h∈Rh\in\mathbb{R} with hβ‰ 0h\ne 0 and x0+h∈Ix_{0}+h\in I put bh=g(x0+h)b_{h}=g(x_{0}+h) and

Q(h)=g(x0+h)βˆ’g(x0)h,R(h)=(1/g)(x0+h)βˆ’(1/g)(x0)h.Q(h)=\frac{g(x_{0}+h)-g(x_{0})}{h},\qquad R(h)=\frac{(1/g)(x_{0}+h)-(1/g)(x_{0})}{h}.

By hypothesis bhβ‰ 0b_{h}\ne 0, and bhβˆ’a=h Q(h)b_{h}-a=h\,Q(h).

Step 1 (an algebraic identity). Expanding, aβˆ’1bhβˆ’1(aβˆ’bh)=bhβˆ’1βˆ’aβˆ’1a^{-1}b_{h}^{-1}(a-b_{h})=b_{h}^{-1}-a^{-1}, so

R(h)=hβˆ’1(bhβˆ’1βˆ’aβˆ’1)=βˆ’aβˆ’1bhβˆ’1 bhβˆ’ah=βˆ’aβˆ’1bhβˆ’1Q(h).R(h)=h^{-1}\bigl(b_{h}^{-1}-a^{-1}\bigr)=-a^{-1}b_{h}^{-1}\,\frac{b_{h}-a}{h}=-a^{-1}b_{h}^{-1}Q(h).

Since aβˆ’1bhβˆ’1β‹…bhaβˆ’1L=L(aβˆ’1)2a^{-1}b_{h}^{-1}\cdot b_{h}a^{-1}L=L\bigl(a^{-1}\bigr)^{2}, it follows that

R(h)+L(aβˆ’1)2=aβˆ’1bhβˆ’1(βˆ’Q(h)+bhaβˆ’1L),R(h)+L\bigl(a^{-1}\bigr)^{2}=a^{-1}b_{h}^{-1}\Bigl(-Q(h)+b_{h}a^{-1}L\Bigr),

and a direct expansion gives

βˆ’Q(h)+bhaβˆ’1L=βˆ’(Q(h)βˆ’L)+aβˆ’1 (bhβˆ’a) L.-Q(h)+b_{h}a^{-1}L=-\bigl(Q(h)-L\bigr)+a^{-1}\,(b_{h}-a)\,L.

Hence, by the triangle inequality and multiplicativity of the absolute value (claims 5 and 4 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field) together with claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field,

∣R(h)+L(aβˆ’1)2βˆ£β‰€Aβˆ’1∣bhβˆ£βˆ’1(∣Q(h)βˆ’L∣+Aβˆ’1∣bhβˆ’aβˆ£β€‰βˆ£L∣).\bigl|R(h)+L(a^{-1})^{2}\bigr|\le A^{-1}|b_{h}|^{-1}\Bigl(\bigl|Q(h)-L\bigr|+A^{-1}\bigl|b_{h}-a\bigr|\,|L|\Bigr).

We refer to this as the basic estimate.

Step 2 (a crude bound on bhb_{h}). Applying Derivative at an Interior Point to gg with Ξ΅=1\varepsilon=1, there is Ξ΄1>0\delta_{1}>0 such that ∣Q(h)βˆ’L∣<1|Q(h)-L|<1 whenever 0<∣h∣<Ξ΄10<|h|<\delta_{1} and x0+h∈Ix_{0}+h\in I. For such hh, claim 5 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field gives

∣Q(h)∣=∣(Q(h)βˆ’L)+Lβˆ£β‰€βˆ£Q(h)βˆ’L∣+∣L∣<1+∣L∣.|Q(h)|=\bigl|\bigl(Q(h)-L\bigr)+L\bigr|\le|Q(h)-L|+|L|<1+|L|.

Put ΞΊ=1+∣L∣\kappa=1+|L|; then 0<ΞΊ0<\kappa by claims 6 and 3 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field. Since bhβˆ’a=hQ(h)b_{h}-a=hQ(h), multiplicativity and claim 10 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field give

∣bhβˆ’a∣=∣hβˆ£β€‰βˆ£Q(h)∣<∣hβˆ£β€‰ΞΊ.|b_{h}-a|=|h|\,|Q(h)|<|h|\,\kappa .

Step 3 (choice of Ξ΄\delta). Let Ξ΅>0\varepsilon>0 be given. Put

C=(2Aβˆ’1)Aβˆ’1(1+Aβˆ’1∣L∣),C=\bigl(2A^{-1}\bigr)A^{-1}\bigl(1+A^{-1}|L|\bigr),

which is positive by claims 5, 6, 7 and 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and claim 2 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, and put Ξ·=Ξ΅Cβˆ’1\eta=\varepsilon C^{-1}, so that 0<Ξ·0<\eta and Ξ·C=Ξ΅\eta C=\varepsilon. Let ΞΌ\mu be the smaller of Ξ·\eta and Aβ‹…2βˆ’1A\cdot 2^{-1} (claim 9 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field); then 0<ΞΌ0<\mu by claim 8 there. Now choose Ξ΄1>0\delta_{1}>0 as in Step 2; put Ξ΄2=ΞΌΞΊβˆ’1>0\delta_{2}=\mu\kappa^{-1}>0, so that Ξ΄2ΞΊ=ΞΌ\delta_{2}\kappa=\mu; and choose Ξ΄3>0\delta_{3}>0 such that ∣Q(h)βˆ’L∣<Ξ·|Q(h)-L|<\eta whenever 0<∣h∣<Ξ΄30<|h|<\delta_{3} and x0+h∈Ix_{0}+h\in I, which exists by the differentiability of gg at x0x_{0}. Let Ξ΄>0\delta>0 be the smallest of Ξ΄1,Ξ΄2,Ξ΄3\delta_{1},\delta_{2},\delta_{3} (claim 9 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, used twice).

Step 4 (the estimate). Let h∈Rh\in\mathbb{R} satisfy 0<∣h∣<δ0<|h|<\delta and x0+h∈Ix_{0}+h\in I. By Step 2 and claim 10 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field,

∣bhβˆ’a∣<∣hβˆ£β€‰ΞΊ<Ξ΄2ΞΊ=ΞΌ,|b_{h}-a|<|h|\,\kappa<\delta_{2}\kappa=\mu ,

so ∣bhβˆ’a∣<Ξ·|b_{h}-a|<\eta and ∣bhβˆ’a∣<Aβ‹…2βˆ’1|b_{h}-a|<A\cdot 2^{-1}. By claims 3 and 7 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field,

Aβˆ’βˆ£bhβˆ£β‰€βˆ£β€‰βˆ£aβˆ£βˆ’βˆ£bhβˆ£β€‰βˆ£β‰€βˆ£aβˆ’bh∣=∣bhβˆ’a∣<Aβ‹…2βˆ’1,A-|b_{h}|\le\bigl|\,|a|-|b_{h}|\,\bigr|\le|a-b_{h}|=|b_{h}-a|<A\cdot 2^{-1},

and since Aβ‹…2βˆ’1+Aβ‹…2βˆ’1=AA\cdot 2^{-1}+A\cdot 2^{-1}=A (claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field), claim 1 there gives Aβ‹…2βˆ’1<∣bh∣A\cdot 2^{-1}<|b_{h}|. Multiplying this strict inequality by the positive element ∣bhβˆ£βˆ’1(2Aβˆ’1)|b_{h}|^{-1}\bigl(2A^{-1}\bigr) (claims 5, 7 and 10 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field) yields

∣bhβˆ£βˆ’1<2Aβˆ’1.|b_{h}|^{-1}<2A^{-1}.

By the choice of Ξ΄3\delta_{3} we also have ∣Q(h)βˆ’L∣<Ξ·|Q(h)-L|<\eta, and Aβˆ’1∣bhβˆ’aβˆ£β€‰βˆ£Lβˆ£β‰€Aβˆ’1Ξ·β€‰βˆ£L∣A^{-1}|b_{h}-a|\,|L|\le A^{-1}\eta\,|L| by claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. Adding these (claim 3 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field),

∣Q(h)βˆ’L∣+Aβˆ’1∣bhβˆ’aβˆ£β€‰βˆ£L∣<Ξ·+Aβˆ’1η∣L∣=Ξ·(1+Aβˆ’1∣L∣).\bigl|Q(h)-L\bigr|+A^{-1}\bigl|b_{h}-a\bigr|\,|L|<\eta+A^{-1}\eta|L|=\eta\bigl(1+A^{-1}|L|\bigr).

Write X=∣bhβˆ£βˆ’1X=|b_{h}|^{-1}, Xβ€²=2Aβˆ’1X'=2A^{-1}, Y=∣Q(h)βˆ’L∣+Aβˆ’1∣bhβˆ’a∣∣L∣Y=|Q(h)-L|+A^{-1}|b_{h}-a||L| and Yβ€²=Ξ·(1+Aβˆ’1∣L∣)Y'=\eta(1+A^{-1}|L|); then 0≀X0\le X, 0≀Y0\le Y, X<Xβ€²X<X', Y<Yβ€²Y<Y' and 0<Xβ€²0<X', 0<Yβ€²0<Y'. If 0<Y0<Y then XY<Xβ€²Y<Xβ€²Yβ€²XY<X'Y<X'Y' by claim 10 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field; if Y=0Y=0 then XY=0<Xβ€²Yβ€²XY=0<X'Y' by claim 5 there. In either case XY<Xβ€²Yβ€²XY<X'Y', and multiplying by the positive element Aβˆ’1A^{-1} gives Aβˆ’1XY<Aβˆ’1Xβ€²Yβ€²A^{-1}XY<A^{-1}X'Y'. Combining with the basic estimate of Step 1 and claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field,

∣R(h)+L(aβˆ’1)2βˆ£β‰€Aβˆ’1XY<Aβˆ’1(2Aβˆ’1)Ξ·(1+Aβˆ’1∣L∣)=Ξ·C=Ξ΅.\bigl|R(h)+L(a^{-1})^{2}\bigr|\le A^{-1}XY<A^{-1}\bigl(2A^{-1}\bigr)\eta\bigl(1+A^{-1}|L|\bigr)=\eta C=\varepsilon .

Since Ξ΅>0\varepsilon>0 was arbitrary, Derivative at an Interior Point shows that 1/g1/g is differentiable at x0x_{0} with derivative βˆ’L(aβˆ’1)2=βˆ’gβ€²(x0)(g(x0)βˆ’1)2-L\bigl(a^{-1}\bigr)^{2}=-g'(x_{0})\bigl(g(x_{0})^{-1}\bigr)^{2}, as claimed.

Proof of claim 2. Let e:Iβ†’Re:I\to\mathbb{R} be given by e(z)=ze(z)=z. By claim 1 of Properties of Natural Number Powers in a Field we have z1=zz^{1}=z for the natural number powers of R\mathbb{R}, so ee is the restriction to II of the map x↦x1x\mapsto x^{1}; by claim 1 of Derivative of a Polynomial Function on the Real Line, ee is differentiable at x0x_{0} with eβ€²(x0)=1e'(x_{0})=1. Since 0βˆ‰I0\notin I we have e(z)=zβ‰ 0e(z)=z\ne 0 for every z∈Iz\in I, and the function 1/e1/e of claim 1 is exactly rr. Claim 1 therefore applies and gives that rr is differentiable at x0x_{0} with

rβ€²(x0)=βˆ’1β‹…(x0βˆ’1)2=βˆ’(x0βˆ’1)2.β– r'(x_{0})=-1\cdot\bigl(x_{0}^{-1}\bigr)^{2}=-\bigl(x_{0}^{-1}\bigr)^{2}. \qquad\blacksquare
Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…