Proof of Trace-Preserving Embeddings Preserve Operator Norms and Compose
lemmalem:trace-preserving-embedding-basic-2026aThe inequality from below is the injectivity clause of the isometry lemma; from above, the square root of the positive element I - lies in by the double commutant property, and its image shows c bounds pi(S). Composites satisfy the embedding identities termwise, and V_{pi'}V_pi implements pi' o pi, so it is the implementing isometry by uniqueness.
Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.
Write for for the traces. By Tracial W*-Probability Spaces §space, each is a cyclic tracial operator algebra with , so by Cyclic Tracial Operator Algebras and Their Traces §star-algebra each contains and is closed under sums, complex scalar multiples, products and adjoints. By Trace-Preserving Embeddings of Tracial W*-Probability Spaces, Their Implementing Isometries and Conditional Expectations §embedding, and satisfy the six identities displayed there, which are exactly the hypotheses of A Trace-Preserving Unital -Homomorphism between Tracial W-Probability Spaces is Implemented by an Isometry; and by Trace-Preserving Embeddings of Tracial W*-Probability Spaces, Their Implementing Isometries and Conditional Expectations §isometry, and are the operators of A Trace-Preserving Unital -Homomorphism between Tracial W-Probability Spaces is Implemented by an Isometry §isometry for and for .
Step 1. (Claim 1, lower bound.) Let . By A Trace-Preserving Unital -Homomorphism between Tracial W-Probability Spaces is Implemented by an Isometry §injective applied to , .
Step 2. (A positive element of .) Let . By Bounded Linear Maps between Complex Normed Spaces and the Operator Norm §operator-norm, is the greatest lower bound of the set of bounds for , each of which is by Bounded Linear Maps between Complex Normed Spaces and the Operator Norm §bounded; so is a lower bound of that set and . Set
By Cyclic Tracial Operator Algebras and Their Traces §star-algebra, , and hence belong to . By Bounded Linear Maps between Complex Inner Product Spaces: the Least Bound, Operations, the Underlying Real Structure, Adjoints, Completeness and the Quadratic-Form Bound §adjoint-calculus, is self-adjoint, so it is an adjoint of itself, and has the adjoint (the scalars and are real); by the same claim is self-adjoint. For the same claim gives
By Bounded Linear Maps between Complex Inner Product Spaces: the Least Bound, Operations, the Underlying Real Structure, Adjoints, Completeness and the Quadratic-Form Bound §least-bound, is a bound for , so by Bounded Linear Maps between Complex Normed Spaces and the Operator Norm §bounded; both sides are , so squaring shows that is a real number . Thus is positive semi-definite in the sense of Positive Semi-Definite Operator, and in the sense of Complex Hilbert Spaces and Bounded Linear Maps: Standing Notation §maps.
Step 3. (The square root lies in .) By Square Roots of Positive Bounded Operators on a Complex Hilbert Space, Commuting with Everything that Commutes with the Operator §square-root applied to there is an operator, which we call , with and ; by Square Roots of Positive Bounded Operators on a Complex Hilbert Space, Commuting with Everything that Commutes with the Operator §commutation, commutes with every that commutes with . Let , the commutant of The Commutant of a Set of Bounded Operators on a Complex Hilbert Space §commutant. Since , we have and ; as composition distributes over sums and commutes with scalar multiples (Bounded Linear Maps between Complex Inner Product Spaces: the Least Bound, Operations, the Underlying Real Structure, Adjoints, Completeness and the Quadratic-Form Bound §operations),
Hence . As was arbitrary, by The Commutant of a Set of Bounded Operators on a Complex Hilbert Space §commutant, and by Tracial W*-Probability Spaces §space. So .
Step 4. (Claim 1, upper bound.) By Complex Hilbert Spaces and Bounded Linear Maps: Standing Notation §maps, includes that is self-adjoint, so is an adjoint of by Bounded Linear Maps between Complex Inner Product Spaces: the Least Bound, Operations, the Underlying Real Structure, Adjoints, Completeness and the Quadratic-Form Bound §adjoint-calculus, and by Bounded Linear Maps between Complex Inner Product Spaces: the Least Bound, Operations, the Underlying Real Structure, Adjoints, Completeness and the Quadratic-Form Bound §adjoint-unique. The identities of Trace-Preserving Embeddings of Tracial W*-Probability Spaces, Their Implementing Isometries and Conditional Expectations §embedding give and
Here have adjoints by Bounded Linear Maps between Complex Inner Product Spaces: the Least Bound, Operations, the Underlying Real Structure, Adjoints, Completeness and the Quadratic-Form Bound §adjoint. For , Bounded Linear Maps between Complex Inner Product Spaces: the Least Bound, Operations, the Underlying Real Structure, Adjoints, Completeness and the Quadratic-Form Bound §adjoint-calculus gives
Hence for every , so the real number is a bound for (Bounded Linear Maps between Complex Normed Spaces and the Operator Norm §bounded), and by Bounded Linear Maps between Complex Inner Product Spaces: the Least Bound, Operations, the Underlying Real Structure, Adjoints, Completeness and the Quadratic-Form Bound §least-bound. With Step 1 this proves claim 1.
Step 5. (Claim 2, the embedding identities.) Let , which is defined because takes values in . For and , applying the identities of Trace-Preserving Embeddings of Tracial W*-Probability Spaces, Their Implementing Isometries and Conditional Expectations §embedding first for and then for at the elements :
So is a trace-preserving embedding of into .
Step 6. (Claim 2, the implementing isometry.) By Bounded Linear Maps between Complex Inner Product Spaces: the Least Bound, Operations, the Underlying Real Structure, Adjoints, Completeness and the Quadratic-Form Bound §operations, . For , Trace-Preserving Embeddings of Tracial W*-Probability Spaces, Their Implementing Isometries and Conditional Expectations §isometry for , and then for at , gives
By Trace-Preserving Embeddings of Tracial W*-Probability Spaces, Their Implementing Isometries and Conditional Expectations §isometry, is the unique element of with for every , the uniqueness being that of A Trace-Preserving Unital -Homomorphism between Tracial W-Probability Spaces is Implemented by an Isometry §isometry applied to . Hence , which completes claim 2.
Loading…
Prerequisites
e38ffc9b-79a6-42c3-acf1-0738bbc09541