TheoremBase

Proof

Step 1: Z‾\overline{Z} is a random variable. For each nn let Dn={kT2−n:k∈{0,1,…,2n}}D_n=\{kT2^{-n}:k\in\{0,1,\dots,2^n\}\}, a finite set, so that D=⋃nDnD=\bigcup_nD_n and Dn⊆Dn+1D_n\subseteq D_{n+1}, the latter because kT2−n=(2k)T2−(n+1)kT2^{-n}=(2k)T2^{-(n+1)}. Enumerate DD as a sequence (ti)i∈N(t_i)_{i\in\mathbb{N}} by listing the finitely many points of D0D_0, then those of D1D_1, and so on, each in increasing order; every point of DD occurs. Each ∣Zti∣ 1Ω0|Z_{t_i}|\,\mathbf{1}_{\Omega_0} is a random variable. Indeed ∣Zti∣|Z_{t_i}| is one, being the composition of the sequentially continuous map c↦∣c∣c\mapsto|c| with a random variable, by measurability of sequentially continuous functions of measurable Euclidean maps; and for a real number cc the set {∣Zti∣ 1Ω0>c}\{|Z_{t_i}|\,\mathbf{1}_{\Omega_0}>c\} equals Ω\Omega when c<0c<0, since the function is nonnegative, and equals Ω0∩{∣Zti∣>c}\Omega_0\cap\{|Z_{t_i}|>c\} when c≥0c\ge0, so it lies in F\mathcal{F} in either case. Moreover ∣Zti∣ 1Ω0|Z_{t_i}|\,\mathbf{1}_{\Omega_0} is bounded in absolute value by KK at every point of Ω\Omega: on Ω0\Omega_0 by hypothesis 1, and off Ω0\Omega_0 it vanishes. Hence, by measurability of countable suprema,

Z‾=sup⁡i∈N(∣Zti∣ 1Ω0)\overline{Z}=\sup_{i\in\mathbb{N}}\big(|Z_{t_i}|\,\mathbf{1}_{\Omega_0}\big)

is a random variable, and 0≤Z‾≤K0\le\overline{Z}\le K.

Step 2: the supremum over DD is the supremum over [0,T][0,T] on Ω0\Omega_0. Fix ω∈Ω0\omega\in\Omega_0. There 1Ω0(ω)=1\mathbf{1}_{\Omega_0}(\omega)=1, so Z‾(ω)=sup⁡t∈D∣Zt(ω)∣\overline{Z}(\omega)=\sup_{t\in D}|Z_t(\omega)|, and since D⊆[0,T]D\subseteq[0,T] this gives Z‾(ω)≤sup⁡t∈[0,T]∣Zt(ω)∣\overline{Z}(\omega)\le\sup_{t\in[0,T]}|Z_t(\omega)|.

For the reverse inequality, let t∈[0,T]t\in[0,T] and ε>0\varepsilon>0. If t=Tt=T then T∈D0⊆DT\in D_0\subseteq D, so ∣Zt(ω)∣≤Z‾(ω)|Z_t(\omega)|\le\overline{Z}(\omega). If t=0t=0 then 0∈D00\in D_0 and the same holds. Suppose 0<t<T0<t<T. By right-continuity at tt choose η>0\eta>0 such that ∣Zs(ω)−Zt(ω)∣≤ε|Z_s(\omega)-Z_t(\omega)|\le\varepsilon whenever t≤s≤min⁡(t+η,T)t\le s\le\min(t+\eta,T). Choose a natural number nn with T2−n<min⁡(η,T−t)T2^{-n}<\min(\eta,T-t), and let kk be the least element of {0,1,…,2n}\{0,1,\dots,2^n\} with kT2−n≥tkT2^{-n}\ge t; such a kk exists because 2nT2−n=T≥t2^nT2^{-n}=T\ge t, and k≥1k\ge1 because t>0t>0. Minimality gives (k−1)T2−n<t(k-1)T2^{-n}<t, hence

t≤kT2−n<t+T2−n<min⁡(t+η,T),t\le kT2^{-n}<t+T2^{-n}<\min(t+\eta,T) ,

using T2−n<ηT2^{-n}<\eta and T2−n<T−tT2^{-n}<T-t. Therefore s=kT2−ns=kT2^{-n} lies in DD and satisfies t≤s≤min⁡(t+η,T)t\le s\le\min(t+\eta,T), so

∣Zt(ω)∣≤∣Zs(ω)∣+ε≤Z‾(ω)+ε.|Z_t(\omega)|\le|Z_s(\omega)|+\varepsilon\le\overline{Z}(\omega)+\varepsilon .

As ε>0\varepsilon>0 was arbitrary, ∣Zt(ω)∣≤Z‾(ω)|Z_t(\omega)|\le\overline{Z}(\omega) for every t∈[0,T]t\in[0,T], and taking the supremum over tt gives the reverse inequality. ■\blacksquare

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…