Step 1: Z is a random variable. For each n let Dn={kT2−n:k∈{0,1,…,2n}}, a finite set, so that D=⋃nDn and Dn⊆Dn+1, the latter because kT2−n=(2k)T2−(n+1). Enumerate D as a sequence (ti)i∈N by listing the finitely many points of D0, then those of D1, and so on, each in increasing order; every point of D occurs. Each ∣Zti∣1Ω0 is a random variable. Indeed ∣Zti∣ is one, being the composition of the sequentially continuous map c↦∣c∣ with a random variable, by measurability of sequentially continuous functions of measurable Euclidean maps; and for a real number c the set {∣Zti∣1Ω0>c} equals Ω when c<0, since the function is nonnegative, and equals Ω0∩{∣Zti∣>c} when c≥0, so it lies in F in either case. Moreover ∣Zti∣1Ω0 is bounded in absolute value by K at every point of Ω: on Ω0 by hypothesis 1, and off Ω0 it vanishes. Hence, by measurability of countable suprema,
Z=i∈Nsup(∣Zti∣1Ω0)
is a random variable, and 0≤Z≤K.
Step 2: the supremum over D is the supremum over [0,T] on Ω0. Fix ω∈Ω0. There 1Ω0(ω)=1, so Z(ω)=supt∈D∣Zt(ω)∣, and since D⊆[0,T] this gives Z(ω)≤supt∈[0,T]∣Zt(ω)∣.
For the reverse inequality, let t∈[0,T] and ε>0. If t=T then T∈D0⊆D, so ∣Zt(ω)∣≤Z(ω). If t=0 then 0∈D0 and the same holds. Suppose 0<t<T. By right-continuity at t choose η>0 such that ∣Zs(ω)−Zt(ω)∣≤ε whenever t≤s≤min(t+η,T). Choose a natural number n with T2−n<min(η,T−t), and let k be the least element of {0,1,…,2n} with kT2−n≥t; such a k exists because 2nT2−n=T≥t, and k≥1 because t>0. Minimality gives (k−1)T2−n<t, hence
t≤kT2−n<t+T2−n<min(t+η,T),
using T2−n<η and T2−n<T−t. Therefore s=kT2−n lies in D and satisfies t≤s≤min(t+η,T), so
∣Zt(ω)∣≤∣Zs(ω)∣+ε≤Z(ω)+ε.
As ε>0 was arbitrary, ∣Zt(ω)∣≤Z(ω) for every t∈[0,T], and taking the supremum over t gives the reverse inequality. ■