Proof of A Configuration-Level Majorant of the Distance from a One-Particle Marginal, Touching at a Given Configuration Law
lemmalem:marginal-distance-majorant-wasserstein-2026aThe one-particle marginal of the push-forward of sigma by the product map of T is the target measure, so the Lipschitz bound for one-particle marginals gives the majorant; the coupling induced by the product map has cost N times the optimal one-particle cost, which forces equality and optimality, and uniqueness of optimal-map classes identifies the optimal displacement with the product field of id - T.
Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. Results and notions whose dimension is a parameter of their own statement, namely Couplings of Two Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Their Quadratic Cost, The Quadratic Wasserstein Distance on Euclidean Space, Optimal Coupling of Two Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment, Optimal Transport Maps and Uniquely Mapped Pairs of Probability Measures and Couplings on Euclidean Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, and the Lipschitz Bound, are applied with in place of their where the measures live on , and The Optimal Map as a Square-Integrable Vector Field: Integrability, Transport Cost and Uniqueness of the Class, which adopts Square-Integrable Vector Fields Against a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space, and Test Functions: Standing Notation, is applied at the configuration level there; the results on particle blocks, tensor powers and one-particle marginals are read with their dimension parameter equal to , as fixed in N-Particle Systems on the Wasserstein Space: Particles, Configurations and the Configuration Level §particles. We write for the identity map of and for the identity map of , which is the map written in clause 3 of the statement; both are Borel, being continuous.
Step 1 (The displacement of the product map). The optimal map is Borel with by Optimal Transport Maps and Uniquely Mapped Pairs of Probability Measures §map, so its product map is Borel by Particle Blocks: Linearity, Splitting of Inner Products, Product Maps and Diagonal Shifts §product-map. Let , . Each component of is a difference of Borel real functions, hence Borel by claim 2 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions, so is Borel by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §borel-maps; by The Optimal Map as a Square-Integrable Vector Field: Integrability, Transport Cost and Uniqueness of the Class §square-integrable (with , and in place of , and ) its class is the element of named in the statement.
For and , the linearity of in Particle Blocks: Linearity, Splitting of Inner Products, Product Maps and Diagonal Shifts §linear and the identity of Particle Blocks: Linearity, Splitting of Inner Products, Product Maps and Diagonal Shifts §product-map give
Since every point of is the configuration of its particles (Particle Blocks: Linearity, Splitting of Inner Products, Product Maps and Diagonal Shifts §linear), the definition of the product map in Particle Blocks of the Configuration Space: Block Maps, Configurations, Product Maps and Diagonal Points §product-map yields
Hence, by Tensor Powers and One-Particle Marginals: Particle Laws, Product Integrals, Push-Forwards, Moments, Product Maps and Diagonal Shifts §product-maps applied to and , and by the transport cost of an optimal map in The Optimal Map as a Square-Integrable Vector Field: Integrability, Transport Cost and Uniqueness of the Class §cost (with and in place of and , both in ),
Step 2 (Clause 1). The push-forward is a probability measure on by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §pushforward. By Tensor Powers and One-Particle Marginals: Particle Laws, Product Integrals, Push-Forwards, Moments, Product Maps and Diagonal Shifts §pushforward (with , and ),
By The Optimal Map as a Square-Integrable Vector Field: Integrability, Transport Cost and Uniqueness of the Class §square-integrable, applied at the configuration level with and in place of and , then Tensor Powers and One-Particle Marginals: Particle Laws, Product Integrals, Push-Forwards, Moments, Product Maps and Diagonal Shifts §product-maps applied to , and finally The Optimal Map as a Square-Integrable Vector Field: Integrability, Transport Cost and Uniqueness of the Class §square-integrable at the particle dimension with , and in place of , and ,
so . Now let . By Tensor Powers Scale the Wasserstein Distance by the Square Root of N, and the One-Particle Marginal is Lipschitz with Constant N^{-1/2} §marginal with , and ,
This is clause 1.
Step 3 (Clause 2). Let . Since , the preimage of a set under being the set itself, Couplings on Euclidean Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, and the Lipschitz Bound §pushforward (with and in place of and ) gives and, with (2),
Both and lie in (Step 2), so The Quadratic Wasserstein Distance on Euclidean Space §distance gives , while clause 1 with gives . Thus
and antisymmetry of the order of gives . The last equality says that is optimal in the sense of Optimal Coupling of Two Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment §optimal. This is clause 2.
Step 4 (Clause 3). Suppose that the ordered pair is uniquely mapped and that is an optimal map from to . The map is Borel (Step 1), satisfies by definition of , and the coupling is optimal by Step 3; so is an optimal map from to in the sense of Optimal Transport Maps and Uniquely Mapped Pairs of Probability Measures §map, read at the configuration level. By The Optimal Map as a Square-Integrable Vector Field: Integrability, Transport Cost and Uniqueness of the Class §unique, applied at the configuration level with , , and in place of , , and , the classes of and of in are equal. By (1) the map is the product map of the Borel representative of the class (Step 1), so by Product Fields and the Projection onto One-Particle Tangent Fields §product-field its class is the product field . Therefore in , which is clause 3.
Loading…
Prerequisites
8f99ff75-366d-4d45-9234-b4b61e9a2017