TheoremBase

Proof of A Configuration-Level Majorant of the Distance from a One-Particle Marginal, Touching at a Given Configuration Law

lemmalem:marginal-distance-majorant-wasserstein-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 7,103 chars · 15 deps · depth 39 Reason: N3: proof of the marginal distance majorant.

The one-particle marginal of the push-forward of sigma by the product map of T is the target measure, so the Lipschitz bound for one-particle marginals gives the majorant; the coupling induced by the product map has cost N times the optimal one-particle cost, which forces equality and optimality, and uniqueness of optimal-map classes identifies the optimal displacement with the product field of id - T.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. Results and notions whose dimension is a parameter of their own statement, namely Couplings of Two Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Their Quadratic Cost, The Quadratic Wasserstein Distance on Euclidean Space, Optimal Coupling of Two Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment, Optimal Transport Maps and Uniquely Mapped Pairs of Probability Measures and Couplings on Euclidean Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, and the Lipschitz Bound, are applied with dNdN in place of their dd where the measures live on RdN\mathbb{R}^{dN}, and The Optimal Map as a Square-Integrable Vector Field: Integrability, Transport Cost and Uniqueness of the Class, which adopts Square-Integrable Vector Fields Against a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space, and Test Functions: Standing Notation, is applied at the configuration level there; the results on particle blocks, tensor powers and one-particle marginals are read with their dimension parameter equal to dd, as fixed in N-Particle Systems on the Wasserstein Space: Particles, Configurations and the Configuration Level §particles. We write id\mathrm{id} for the identity map of Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} and idN\mathrm{id}_{N} for the identity map of RdN\mathbb{R}^{dN}, which is the map written id\mathrm{id} in clause 3 of the statement; both are Borel, being continuous.

Step 1 (The displacement of the product map). The optimal map TT is Borel with T#σ[1]=m^T_{\#}\sigma^{[1]}=\hat{m} by Optimal Transport Maps and Uniquely Mapped Pairs of Probability Measures §map, so its product map T⊕:RdN→RdNT^{\oplus}:\mathbb{R}^{dN}\to\mathbb{R}^{dN} is Borel by Particle Blocks: Linearity, Splitting of Inner Products, Product Maps and Diagonal Shifts §product-map. Let g=id−T:Rd→Rdg=\mathrm{id}-T:\mathbb{R}^{d}\to\mathbb{R}^{d}, g(y)=y−T(y)g(y)=y-T(y). Each component of gg is a difference of Borel real functions, hence Borel by claim 2 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions, so gg is Borel by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §borel-maps; by The Optimal Map as a Square-Integrable Vector Field: Integrability, Transport Cost and Uniqueness of the Class §square-integrable (with σ[1]\sigma^{[1]}, m^\hat{m} and TT in place of μ\mu, ν\nu and SS) its class is the element id−T\mathrm{id}-T of L2(σ[1];Rd)L^{2}(\sigma^{[1]};\mathbb{R}^{d}) named in the statement.

For x∈RdNx\in\mathbb{R}^{dN} and k∈[N]k\in[N], the linearity of pk\mathfrak{p}_{k} in Particle Blocks: Linearity, Splitting of Inner Products, Product Maps and Diagonal Shifts §linear and the identity pk∘T⊕=T∘pk\mathfrak{p}_{k}\circ T^{\oplus}=T\circ\mathfrak{p}_{k} of Particle Blocks: Linearity, Splitting of Inner Products, Product Maps and Diagonal Shifts §product-map give

pk(x−T⊕(x))=pk(x)−T(pk(x))=g(pk(x)).\mathfrak{p}_{k}\bigl(x-T^{\oplus}(x)\bigr)=\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x)-T(\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x))=g(\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x)).

Since every point of RdN\mathbb{R}^{dN} is the configuration of its particles (Particle Blocks: Linearity, Splitting of Inner Products, Product Maps and Diagonal Shifts §linear), the definition of the product map in Particle Blocks of the Configuration Space: Block Maps, Configurations, Product Maps and Diagonal Points §product-map yields

x−T⊕(x)=[g(p1(x)),…,g(pN(x))]=g⊕(x)(x∈RdN).(1)x-T^{\oplus}(x)=\bigl[g(\mathfrak{p}_{1}(x)),\dots,g(\mathfrak{p}_{N}(x))\bigr]=g^{\oplus}(x)\qquad(x\in\mathbb{R}^{dN}).\tag{1}

Hence, by Tensor Powers and One-Particle Marginals: Particle Laws, Product Integrals, Push-Forwards, Moments, Product Maps and Diagonal Shifts §product-maps applied to gg and P=σP=\sigma, and by the transport cost of an optimal map in The Optimal Map as a Square-Integrable Vector Field: Integrability, Transport Cost and Uniqueness of the Class §cost (with σ[1]\sigma^{[1]} and m^\hat{m} in place of μ\mu and ν\nu, both in P2(Rd)\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d})),

∫RdN∥x−T⊕(x)∥2 σ(dx)=∫RdN∥g⊕∥2 dσ=N∫Rd∥g∥2 dσ[1]=N ∥id−T∥σ[1]2=N W2(σ[1],m^)2.(2)\int_{\mathbb{R}^{dN}}\lVert x-T^{\oplus}(x)\rVert^{2}\,\sigma(dx)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{dN}}\lVert g^{\oplus}\rVert^{2}\,d\sigma=N\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\lVert g\rVert^{2}\,d\sigma^{[1]}=N\,\lVert\mathrm{id}-T\rVert_{\sigma^{[1]}}^{2}=N\,W_{2}(\sigma^{[1]},\hat{m})^{2}.\tag{2}

Step 2 (Clause 1). The push-forward σT=(T⊕)#σ\sigma_{T}=(T^{\oplus})_{\#}\sigma is a probability measure on RdN\mathbb{R}^{dN} by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §pushforward. By Tensor Powers and One-Particle Marginals: Particle Laws, Product Integrals, Push-Forwards, Moments, Product Maps and Diagonal Shifts §pushforward (with h=Th=T, p=dp=d and P=σP=\sigma),

σT[1]=((T⊕)#σ)[1]=T#(σ[1])=m^.\sigma_{T}^{[1]}=\bigl((T^{\oplus})_{\#}\sigma\bigr)^{[1]}=T_{\#}\bigl(\sigma^{[1]}\bigr)=\hat{m}.

By The Optimal Map as a Square-Integrable Vector Field: Integrability, Transport Cost and Uniqueness of the Class §square-integrable, applied at the configuration level with σ\sigma and T⊕T^{\oplus} in place of μ\mu and SS, then Tensor Powers and One-Particle Marginals: Particle Laws, Product Integrals, Push-Forwards, Moments, Product Maps and Diagonal Shifts §product-maps applied to TT, and finally The Optimal Map as a Square-Integrable Vector Field: Integrability, Transport Cost and Uniqueness of the Class §square-integrable at the particle dimension with σ[1]\sigma^{[1]}, m^\hat{m} and TT in place of μ\mu, ν\nu and SS,

M2(σT)=∫RdN∥T⊕∥2 dσ=N∫Rd∥T∥2 dσ[1]=N M2(m^)<∞,M_{2}(\sigma_{T})=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{dN}}\lVert T^{\oplus}\rVert^{2}\,d\sigma=N\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\lVert T\rVert^{2}\,d\sigma^{[1]}=N\,M_{2}(\hat{m})<\infty ,

so σT∈P2(RdN)\sigma_{T}\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{dN}). Now let P∈P2(RdN)P\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{dN}). By Tensor Powers Scale the Wasserstein Distance by the Square Root of N, and the One-Particle Marginal is Lipschitz with Constant N^{-1/2} §marginal with P′=σTP'=\sigma_{T}, and σT[1]=m^\sigma_{T}^{[1]}=\hat{m},

N W2(P[1],m^)2=N W2(P[1],σT[1])2≤W2(P,σT)2.N\,W_{2}(P^{[1]},\hat{m})^{2}=N\,W_{2}(P^{[1]},\sigma_{T}^{[1]})^{2}\le W_{2}(P,\sigma_{T})^{2}.

This is clause 1.

Step 3 (Clause 2). Let γ=(idN,T⊕)#σ\gamma=(\mathrm{id}_{N},T^{\oplus})_{\#}\sigma. Since (idN)#σ=σ(\mathrm{id}_{N})_{\#}\sigma=\sigma, the preimage of a set under idN\mathrm{id}_{N} being the set itself, Couplings on Euclidean Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, and the Lipschitz Bound §pushforward (with idN\mathrm{id}_{N} and T⊕T^{\oplus} in place of SS and TT) gives γ∈Π(σ,σT)\gamma\in\Pi(\sigma,\sigma_{T}) and, with (2),

I(γ)=∫RdN∥x−T⊕(x)∥2 σ(dx)=N W2(σ[1],m^)2.I(\gamma)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{dN}}\lVert x-T^{\oplus}(x)\rVert^{2}\,\sigma(dx)=N\,W_{2}(\sigma^{[1]},\hat{m})^{2}.

Both σ\sigma and σT\sigma_{T} lie in P2(RdN)\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{dN}) (Step 2), so The Quadratic Wasserstein Distance on Euclidean Space §distance gives W2(σ,σT)2≤I(γ)W_{2}(\sigma,\sigma_{T})^{2}\le I(\gamma), while clause 1 with P=σP=\sigma gives N W2(σ[1],m^)2≤W2(σ,σT)2N\,W_{2}(\sigma^{[1]},\hat{m})^{2}\le W_{2}(\sigma,\sigma_{T})^{2}. Thus

W2(σ,σT)2≤I(γ)=N W2(σ[1],m^)2≤W2(σ,σT)2,W_{2}(\sigma,\sigma_{T})^{2}\le I(\gamma)=N\,W_{2}(\sigma^{[1]},\hat{m})^{2}\le W_{2}(\sigma,\sigma_{T})^{2},

and antisymmetry of the order of R\mathbb{R} gives N W2(σ[1],m^)2=W2(σ,σT)2=I(γ)N\,W_{2}(\sigma^{[1]},\hat{m})^{2}=W_{2}(\sigma,\sigma_{T})^{2}=I(\gamma). The last equality says that γ\gamma is optimal in the sense of Optimal Coupling of Two Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment §optimal. This is clause 2.

Step 4 (Clause 3). Suppose that the ordered pair (σ,σT)(\sigma,\sigma_{T}) is uniquely mapped and that SS is an optimal map from σ\sigma to σT\sigma_{T}. The map T⊕T^{\oplus} is Borel (Step 1), satisfies (T⊕)#σ=σT(T^{\oplus})_{\#}\sigma=\sigma_{T} by definition of σT\sigma_{T}, and the coupling (idN,T⊕)#σ=γ(\mathrm{id}_{N},T^{\oplus})_{\#}\sigma=\gamma is optimal by Step 3; so T⊕T^{\oplus} is an optimal map from σ\sigma to σT\sigma_{T} in the sense of Optimal Transport Maps and Uniquely Mapped Pairs of Probability Measures §map, read at the configuration level. By The Optimal Map as a Square-Integrable Vector Field: Integrability, Transport Cost and Uniqueness of the Class §unique, applied at the configuration level with σ\sigma, σT\sigma_{T}, SS and T⊕T^{\oplus} in place of μ\mu, ν\nu, TT and T′T', the classes of idN−S\mathrm{id}_{N}-S and of idN−T⊕\mathrm{id}_{N}-T^{\oplus} in L2(σ;RdN)L^{2}(\sigma;\mathbb{R}^{dN}) are equal. By (1) the map idN−T⊕\mathrm{id}_{N}-T^{\oplus} is the product map g⊕g^{\oplus} of the Borel representative gg of the class id−T∈L2(σ[1];Rd)\mathrm{id}-T\in L^{2}(\sigma^{[1]};\mathbb{R}^{d}) (Step 1), so by Product Fields and the Projection onto One-Particle Tangent Fields §product-field its class is the product field (id−T)⊕∈L2(σ;RdN)(\mathrm{id}-T)^{\oplus}\in L^{2}(\sigma;\mathbb{R}^{dN}). Therefore id−S=(id−T)⊕\mathrm{id}-S=(\mathrm{id}-T)^{\oplus} in L2(σ;RdN)L^{2}(\sigma;\mathbb{R}^{dN}), which is clause 3.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Comments

Loading…