TheoremBase

For a closed set F the Lipschitz functions max(0, 1 - n dist(x,F)) decrease to its indicator, so dominated convergence gives mu(F)=nu(F); closed sets form a generating pi-system, and the uniqueness lemma for finite measures concludes.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. Let X=(Rq,dE)X=(\mathbb{R}^{q},d_{E}), a metric space by Rn\mathbb{R}^n with the Euclidean Distance Is a Complete Metric Space with Coordinatewise Convergence. By Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation (i) the σ\sigma-algebra B(Rq)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{q}) is the Borel σ\sigma-algebra of XX, so claim 1 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space applies to it: every closed subset FF of XX belongs to B(Rq)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{q}), and the family C\mathcal{C} of closed subsets of XX is a π\pi-system whose generated σ\sigma-algebra is B(Rq)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{q}). Since μ(Rq)=1=ν(Rq)\mu(\mathbb{R}^{q})=1=\nu(\mathbb{R}^{q}), claim 1 of Uniqueness of Finite Measures on a Generating Pi-System and the Density of the Exponential Law reduces the assertion μ=ν\mu=\nu to

μ(F)=ν(F)for every closed F⊆Rq,\mu(F)=\nu(F)\qquad\text{for every closed }F\subseteq\mathbb{R}^{q},

which we now prove. If F=∅F=\varnothing both sides are 00 (Measure, Measure Space, and Probability Measure). Let FF be nonempty and closed, write dist⁡(x,F)\operatorname{dist}(x,F) for the distance from xx to FF, the infimum of {dE(x,a):a∈F}\{d_{E}(x,a):a\in F\}, and for n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}, read in R\mathbb{R} as in The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background (i), let

ϕn:Rq→R,ϕn(x)=max⁡{0, 1−ndist⁡(x,F)},\phi_{n}:\mathbb{R}^{q}\to\mathbb{R},\qquad\phi_{n}(x)=\max\{0,\,1-n\operatorname{dist}(x,F)\},

the larger of the two numbers, which exists by the trichotomy of the order of Ordered Field.

Step 1: ϕn\phi_{n} is Lipschitz with values in [0,1][0,1]. Since 0≤dist⁡(x,F)0\le\operatorname{dist}(x,F) (claim 1 of The Distance to a Set is Nonexpansive) and 0≤n0\le n, one has 1−ndist⁡(x,F)≤11-n\operatorname{dist}(x,F)\le1 (claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and the compatibility of the order with addition, an axiom of Ordered Field), so 0≤ϕn(x)≤10\le\phi_{n}(x)\le1. For real numbers a,ba,b one has ∣max⁡{0,a}−max⁡{0,b}∣≤∣a−b∣|\max\{0,a\}-\max\{0,b\}|\le|a-b|: if 0≤a0\le a and 0≤b0\le b the left side is ∣a−b∣|a-b|; if a≤0a\le0 and b≤0b\le0 it is ∣0−0∣=0≤∣a−b∣|0-0|=0\le|a-b| (claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field); and if b≤0≤ab\le0\le a it is ∣a∣=a≤a−b=∣a−b∣|a|=a\le a-b=|a-b|, by Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field applied to b≤0b\le0, and 0≤a−b0\le a-b; the case a≤0≤ba\le0\le b is symmetric (claim 2 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field). Hence, for x,y∈Rqx,y\in\mathbb{R}^{q},

∣ϕn(x)−ϕn(y)∣≤∣(1−ndist⁡(x,F))−(1−ndist⁡(y,F))∣=n ∣dist⁡(x,F)−dist⁡(y,F)∣≤n dE(x,y),|\phi_{n}(x)-\phi_{n}(y)|\le\bigl|(1-n\operatorname{dist}(x,F))-(1-n\operatorname{dist}(y,F))\bigr|=n\,\bigl|\operatorname{dist}(x,F)-\operatorname{dist}(y,F)\bigr|\le n\,d_{E}(x,y),

by claim 4 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field (with ∣n∣=n|n|=n by Absolute Value in an Ordered Field) and claim 4 of The Distance to a Set is Nonexpansive. Thus ϕn\phi_{n} is Lipschitz with constant nn, and by hypothesis

∫Rqϕn dμ=∫Rqϕn dνfor every n∈N.\int_{\mathbb{R}^{q}}\phi_{n}\,d\mu=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{q}}\phi_{n}\,d\nu\qquad\text{for every }n\in\mathbb{N}.

Step 2: ϕn(x)→1F(x)\phi_{n}(x)\to\mathbf{1}_{F}(x) for every xx. Let x∈Fx\in F. Then dist⁡(x,F)≤dE(x,x)=0\operatorname{dist}(x,F)\le d_{E}(x,x)=0 by claim 2 of The Distance to a Set is Nonexpansive with a=xa=x, so dist⁡(x,F)=0\operatorname{dist}(x,F)=0 by claim 1 there and the antisymmetry of ≤\le, and ϕn(x)=max⁡{0,1}=1=1F(x)\phi_{n}(x)=\max\{0,1\}=1=\mathbf{1}_{F}(x) for every nn (using 0⋅n=00\cdot n=0, claim 1 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field). Let x∉Fx\notin F. The complement Rq∖F\mathbb{R}^{q}\setminus F is open in XX by Closed Subset of a Topological Space, so there is a positive real rr such that every yy with dE(x,y)<rd_{E}(x,y)<r lies outside FF; hence r≤dE(x,a)r\le d_{E}(x,a) for every a∈Fa\in F, so rr is a lower bound of {dE(x,a):a∈F}\{d_{E}(x,a):a\in F\} and r≤dist⁡(x,F)r\le\operatorname{dist}(x,F), the infimum being the greatest lower bound. By claim 2 of The Archimedean Property of the Real Numbers there is N∈NN\in\mathbb{N} with 1<Nr1<Nr; for n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N} with N≤nN\le n one has 1<Nr≤nr≤ndist⁡(x,F)1<Nr\le nr\le n\operatorname{dist}(x,F) (claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, the natural number order being transported by claim 6 of Properties of the Canonical Map from the Natural Numbers to an Ordered Field, the case N=nN=n being trivial), so 1−ndist⁡(x,F)<01-n\operatorname{dist}(x,F)<0 and ϕn(x)=0=1F(x)\phi_{n}(x)=0=\mathbf{1}_{F}(x). In either case the sequence (ϕn(x))n(\phi_{n}(x))_{n} is eventually constant with value 1F(x)\mathbf{1}_{F}(x), hence converges to it.

Step 3: conclusion. Each ϕn\phi_{n} is Borel and integrable, by the preamble of the statement, and satisfies ∣ϕn∣≤1|\phi_{n}|\le1, and the constant 11 is integrable with respect to μ\mu and to ν\nu by claim 6(a) of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space. By Dominated Convergence Theorem, applied once for μ\mu and once for ν\nu, ∫ϕn dμ→∫1F dμ\int\phi_{n}\,d\mu\to\int\mathbf{1}_{F}\,d\mu and ∫ϕn dν→∫1F dν\int\phi_{n}\,d\nu\to\int\mathbf{1}_{F}\,d\nu; the integral of the indicator of the Borel set FF is the measure of FF by Simple Functions, Nonnegative Simple Functions, and the Simple Integral with Nonnegative Measurable Maps and Their Lebesgue Integral, 1F\mathbf{1}_{F} being Borel by claim 1 of Arithmetic of Measurable Real- and [0,∞]-Valued Maps, and the integral of the nonnegative integrable function 1F\mathbf{1}_{F} delivered by dominated convergence agrees with it by claim 6(c) of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space. The two sequences of integrals coincide term by term by step 1, so their limits coincide by Uniqueness of Limits and Boundedness of Convergent Real Sequences: μ(F)=ν(F)\mu(F)=\nu(F). This holds for every closed FF, and μ=ν\mu=\nu follows as explained at the start.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…