Choose with for all . Since is measurable and bounded and carries a finite restricted Lebesgue measure, is integrable on for every , so the hypothesis is meaningful.
Define by
Step 1: is continuous. Let . Writing , where denotes the function equal to on and elsewhere, and using linearity of the integral,
Since , monotonicity of the integral gives . Hence, given , the choice makes whenever satisfy , so is continuous on , where both the domain and the codomain carry the metric of the real line. In particular is measurable by claim 4 of Measurability of Countable Suprema, Bounded Pointwise Limits, Monotone Functions, and Continuous Functions, and is bounded, since for every , so it is integrable on each .
Step 2: satisfies the same inequality. By hypothesis for every . Since , monotonicity of the integral gives, for every ,
Step 3: conclusion. Let . The restriction of to is continuous by claim 1 of Restriction Stability of Continuity and of the Derivative, so by claim 3 of Restricted Lebesgue Measure and Integral Toolkit on a Compact Interval that restriction is Riemann integrable on and its Lebesgue integral over equals its Riemann integral there; for both integrals are by convention. Thus the inequality of Step 2 is exactly the hypothesis of Gronwall's lemma in integral form, applied to the continuous function on with the constants and , and that lemma yields
Combining with gives for every .
Loading…
Prerequisites
ed0a55b3-9da5-4294-8a4b-48222b170139