TheoremBase

Proof

Choose K≥0K\ge0 with ∣u(s)∣≤K|u(s)|\le K for all s∈[0,T]s\in[0,T]. Since uu is measurable and bounded and [0,T][0,T] carries a finite restricted Lebesgue measure, uu is integrable on [0,t][0,t] for every t∈[0,T]t\in[0,T], so the hypothesis is meaningful.

Define v:[0,T]→Rv:[0,T]\to\mathbb{R} by

v(t)=a+c∫[0,t]u(s) ds.v(t)=a+c\int_{[0,t]}u(s)\,ds .

Step 1: vv is continuous. Let 0≤r≤t≤T0\le r\le t\le T. Writing u1[0,t]=u1[0,r]+u1(r,t]u\mathbf{1}_{[0,t]}=u\mathbf{1}_{[0,r]}+u\mathbf{1}_{(r,t]}, where 1D\mathbf{1}_D denotes the function equal to 11 on DD and 00 elsewhere, and using linearity of the integral,

v(t)−v(r)=c∫(r,t]u(s) ds.v(t)-v(r)=c\int_{(r,t]}u(s)\,ds .

Since −K≤u≤K-K\le u\le K, monotonicity of the integral gives ∣v(t)−v(r)∣≤cK (t−r)|v(t)-v(r)|\le cK\,(t-r). Hence, given ε>0\varepsilon>0, the choice δ=ε/(cK+1)>0\delta=\varepsilon/(cK+1)>0 makes ∣v(t)−v(r)∣<ε|v(t)-v(r)|<\varepsilon whenever t,r∈[0,T]t,r\in[0,T] satisfy ∣t−r∣<δ|t-r|<\delta, so vv is continuous on [0,T][0,T], where both the domain [0,T][0,T] and the codomain R\mathbb{R} carry the metric of the real line. In particular vv is measurable by claim 4 of Measurability of Countable Suprema, Bounded Pointwise Limits, Monotone Functions, and Continuous Functions, and vv is bounded, since ∣v(t)∣≤∣a∣+cKT|v(t)|\le|a|+cKT for every t∈[0,T]t\in[0,T], so it is integrable on each [0,t][0,t].

Step 2: vv satisfies the same inequality. By hypothesis u(t)≤v(t)u(t)\le v(t) for every t∈[0,T]t\in[0,T]. Since c≥0c\ge0, monotonicity of the integral gives, for every t∈[0,T]t\in[0,T],

v(t)=a+c∫[0,t]u(s) ds≤a+c∫[0,t]v(s) ds.v(t)=a+c\int_{[0,t]}u(s)\,ds\le a+c\int_{[0,t]}v(s)\,ds .

Step 3: conclusion. Let t∈(0,T]t\in(0,T]. The restriction of vv to [0,t][0,t] is continuous by claim 1 of Restriction Stability of Continuity and of the Derivative, so by claim 3 of Restricted Lebesgue Measure and Integral Toolkit on a Compact Interval that restriction is Riemann integrable on [0,t][0,t] and its Lebesgue integral over [0,t][0,t] equals its Riemann integral there; for t=0t=0 both integrals are 00 by convention. Thus the inequality of Step 2 is exactly the hypothesis of Gronwall's lemma in integral form, applied to the continuous function vv on [0,T][0,T] with the constants aa and c≥0c\ge0, and that lemma yields

v(t)≤aexp⁡(ct)for every t∈[0,T].v(t)\le a\exp(ct)\qquad\text{for every }t\in[0,T].

Combining with u(t)≤v(t)u(t)\le v(t) gives u(t)≤aexp⁡(ct)u(t)\le a\exp(ct) for every t∈[0,T]t\in[0,T]. ■\blacksquare

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…