TheoremBase

Both claims are immediate from the definitions: the value of a first-order operator does not change when the form argument does, and the form arguments fed to the operator by the two shifts differ only in that slot.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.

Claim 1. Let x∈Wx\in W, let r∈Rr\in\mathbb{R}, let p∈Hp\in H and let X,Y∈Sym(V)X,Y\in\mathrm{Sym}(V) satisfy X⪯YX\preceq Y. Since FF is first order,

F(x,r,p,Y)=F(x,r,p,X),F(x,r,p,Y)=F(x,r,p,X),

and therefore F(x,r,p,Y)≤F(x,r,p,X)F(x,r,p,Y)\le F(x,r,p,X). As xx, rr, pp, XX and YY were arbitrary, FF is degenerate elliptic in the sense of Degenerate Elliptic Second-Order Equation Operator on a Hilbert Triple (i).

Claim 2. Let x∈Wx\in W, r∈Rr\in\mathbb{R}, p∈Hp\in H and Y,Y′∈Sym(H)Y,Y'\in\mathrm{Sym}(H). By Second-Order Equation Operator on an Open Subset of a Hilbert Triple and Its δ\delta-Shifts (ii) the forms Y∣V+δIVY|_{V}+\delta I_{V} and Y′∣V+δIVY'|_{V}+\delta I_{V} belong to Sym(V)\mathrm{Sym}(V), and

Fδ−(x,r,p,Y)=F(x, r+δh(x), p+δAx, Y∣V+δIV),Fδ−(x,r,p,Y′)=F(x, r+δh(x), p+δAx, Y′∣V+δIV).F^{-}_{\delta}(x,r,p,Y)=F\bigl(x,\,r+\delta h(x),\,p+\delta Ax,\,Y|_{V}+\delta I_{V}\bigr),\qquad F^{-}_{\delta}(x,r,p,Y')=F\bigl(x,\,r+\delta h(x),\,p+\delta Ax,\,Y'|_{V}+\delta I_{V}\bigr).

The two right-hand sides are values of FF at the same first three arguments, hence are equal because FF is first order. The same argument applies to Fδ+F^{+}_{\delta}, whose two values are those of FF at (x, r−δh(x), p−δAx, Y∣V−δIV)\bigl(x,\,r-\delta h(x),\,p-\delta Ax,\,Y|_{V}-\delta I_{V}\bigr) and at (x, r−δh(x), p−δAx, Y′∣V−δIV)\bigl(x,\,r-\delta h(x),\,p-\delta Ax,\,Y'|_{V}-\delta I_{V}\bigr), which again differ only in the form argument.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…