TheoremBase

Bounds c'k <= 2c_k eventually and 1-1/t <= log t <= t-1 give claim 1; the finite-dimensional change-of-variances lemma on the projections, transferred to X by the projection lemma for relative entropy, shows that finite entropy relative to gammacgamma_c and gamma{c'} coincide on measures with absolutely convergent diagonal quadratic moments, with the stated shift, which yields the mutual noise-connectedness of the two Gaussians, the equal domains and the penalty identity; the score shift is a direct computation in the defining identity of the relative score.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.

Throughout, B≥0B\ge0 is a bound for the sequence dd, which is admissible: the series ∑k=1∞∣dk∣ ck\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}|d_{k}|\,c_{k} converges and ∣dk∣ ak≤B|d_{k}|\,a_{k}\le B for every k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}. Since ck−1+dkc_{k}^{-1}+d_{k} is positive, ck′c'_{k} is a positive real number and

1ck′=1ck+dk(k∈N).(0)\frac{1}{c'_{k}}=\frac{1}{c_{k}}+d_{k}\qquad(k\in\mathbb{N}).\tag{0}

Put rk=ck′/ckr_{k}=c'_{k}/c_{k}, a positive real number. For μ∈P(X)\mu\in\mathcal{P}(X) and n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N} write μn=(pn)#μ\mu_{n}=(p_{n})_{\#}\mu, a Borel probability measure on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} by Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §pushforward.

Step 0 (Coordinate second moments). Let μ∈P2(X)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X) and k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}. By Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity the function x↦xkx\mapsto x_{k} is Borel, hence so is x↦xk2x\mapsto x_{k}^{2} by the arithmetic of measurable maps; and by the same claim, applied with n=kn=k,

xk2≤∑j=1kxj2=∥pk(x)∥2=∣Pkx∣2≤∣Pkx∣2+∣Qkx∣2=∣x∣2(x∈X).x_{k}^{2}\le\sum_{j=1}^{k}x_{j}^{2}=\lVert p_{k}(x)\rVert^{2}=|P_{k}x|^{2}\le|P_{k}x|^{2}+|Q_{k}x|^{2}=|x|^{2}\qquad(x\in X).

By monotonicity of the integral, Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative, the integral of x↦xk2x\mapsto x_{k}^{2} against μ\mu is at most the second moment M2(μ)M_{2}(\mu), which is finite by The Second Moment of a Borel Probability Measure on a Hilbert Space and the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment §space. So x↦xk2x\mapsto x_{k}^{2} is integrable with respect to μ\mu by the criterion recorded in Measure Spaces and the Lebesgue Integral: Standing Notation §integral, and we write

mk(μ)=∫Xxk2 μ(dx),m_{k}(\mu)=\int_{X}x_{k}^{2}\,\mu(dx),

a nonnegative real number. Consequently x↦xkx\mapsto x_{k} is 22-integrable with respect to μ\mu in the sense of Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm §space; its class in L2(μ)L^{2}(\mu) is again written xkx_{k}, and by The Lebesgue Space of Square-Integrable Functions is a Real Hilbert Space §inner-product

∥xk∥L2(μ)2=mk(μ),⟨xk,φ⟩L2(μ)=∫Xxk φ(x) μ(dx)for every φ∈FCb1(X),\lVert x_{k}\rVert_{L^{2}(\mu)}^{2}=m_{k}(\mu),\qquad\langle x_{k},\varphi\rangle_{L^{2}(\mu)}=\int_{X}x_{k}\,\varphi(x)\,\mu(dx)\quad\text{for every }\varphi\in\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X),

the classes of bounded C1C^{1} cylindrical functions lying in L2(μ)L^{2}(\mu) by Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §square-integrable.

Step 1 (Claim 1). The series ∑k∣dk∣ck\sum_{k}|d_{k}|c_{k} converges, so its terms tend to 00 by Elementary Properties of Series of Real Numbers §terms-vanish; by the definition of convergence of a real sequence there is K∈NK\in\mathbb{N} with ∣dk∣ ck≤12|d_{k}|\,c_{k}\le\frac12 for every k≥Kk\ge K. For such kk, by (0),

1ck′≥1ck−∣dk∣=1−∣dk∣ckck≥12ck,sock′≤2ck(k≥K).(1)\frac{1}{c'_{k}}\ge\frac{1}{c_{k}}-|d_{k}|=\frac{1-|d_{k}|c_{k}}{c_{k}}\ge\frac{1}{2c_{k}},\qquad\text{so}\qquad c'_{k}\le2c_{k}\qquad(k\ge K).\tag{1}

Let n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}. Splitting the partial sums at KK and using (1), the nonnegativity of the terms, and Series of Nonnegative Real Numbers, Comparison, and the Geometric Series §dominates for the convergent series ∑kck\sum_{k}c_{k} (convergent by Variance Sequences and Their Truncations §variances) and ∑k∣dk∣ck\sum_{k}|d_{k}|c_{k},

∑k=1nck′≤∑k=1K−1ck′+2∑k=1∞ck,∑k=1n∣dk∣ ck′≤∑k=1K−1∣dk∣ ck′+2∑k=1∞∣dk∣ ck\sum_{k=1}^{n}c'_{k}\le\sum_{k=1}^{K-1}c'_{k}+2\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}c_{k},\qquad\sum_{k=1}^{n}|d_{k}|\,c'_{k}\le\sum_{k=1}^{K-1}|d_{k}|\,c'_{k}+2\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}|d_{k}|\,c_{k}

(an empty sum being 00). The partial sums of these two series of nonnegative terms are therefore bounded above, and both series converge by Series of Nonnegative Real Numbers, Comparison, and the Geometric Series §criterion. In particular c′c', a sequence of positive real numbers with ∑kck′\sum_{k}c'_{k} convergent, is a variance sequence, which proves the first assertion of claim 1, and

the series ∑k=1∞∣dk∣ ck′ converges.(2)\text{the series }\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}|d_{k}|\,c'_{k}\text{ converges.}\tag{2}

Put κ′=2κ+∑j=1K−1cj′/aj\kappa'=2\kappa+\sum_{j=1}^{K-1}c'_{j}/a_{j}, a positive real number since κ\kappa is positive and the added terms are nonnegative. If k≥Kk\ge K, then ck′≤2ck≤2κak≤κ′akc'_{k}\le2c_{k}\le2\kappa a_{k}\le\kappa'a_{k} by (1) and the hypothesis on κ\kappa. If k<Kk<K, then ck′=(ck′/ak) ak≤(∑j=1K−1cj′/aj)ak≤κ′akc'_{k}=(c'_{k}/a_{k})\,a_{k}\le\bigl(\sum_{j=1}^{K-1}c'_{j}/a_{j}\bigr)a_{k}\le\kappa'a_{k}, all terms being nonnegative. This proves the second assertion of claim 1.

For the third, let k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}. By (0), rk−1=ck′(ck−1−ck′−1)=−dkck′r_{k}-1=c'_{k}\bigl(c_{k}^{-1}-c'^{-1}_{k}\bigr)=-d_{k}c'_{k} and 1−rk−1=ck(ck−1−ck′−1)=−dkck1-r_{k}^{-1}=c_{k}\bigl(c_{k}^{-1}-c'^{-1}_{k}\bigr)=-d_{k}c_{k}. The bounds 1−t−1≤log⁡t≤t−11-t^{-1}\le\log t\le t-1 of The Function slog⁡ss\log s: Continuity, Young's Inequality and Lower Bounds, with the Elementary Bounds for the Exponential and the Logarithm §log, applied with t=rkt=r_{k}, give −dkck≤log⁡rk≤−dkck′-d_{k}c_{k}\le\log r_{k}\le-d_{k}c'_{k}, hence

∣log⁡rk∣≤∣dk∣ ck+∣dk∣ ck′(k∈N).(3)|\log r_{k}|\le|d_{k}|\,c_{k}+|d_{k}|\,c'_{k}\qquad(k\in\mathbb{N}).\tag{3}

The series ∑k(∣dk∣ck+∣dk∣ck′)\sum_{k}\bigl(|d_{k}|c_{k}+|d_{k}|c'_{k}\bigr) converges by admissibility, (2) and Elementary Properties of Series of Real Numbers §linearity, so by (3) and An Absolutely Convergent Series of Real Numbers Converges §dominated the series ∑klog⁡(ck′/ck)=∑klog⁡rk\sum_{k}\log(c'_{k}/c_{k})=\sum_{k}\log r_{k} converges absolutely. This proves claim 1. We fix κ′\kappa' as above (the sets D′\mathcal{D}' and DΣ′\mathcal{D}'_{\Sigma} do not depend on this choice, as the statement records), and note that ∑klog⁡rk\sum_{k}\log r_{k} converges by An Absolutely Convergent Series of Real Numbers Converges §convergence.

Since cc and c′c' are variance sequences, for every n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N} the truncations c(n)c^{(n)} and c′(n)c'^{(n)} are variance vectors by Variance Sequences and Their Truncations §truncations, and by Diagonal Gaussian Measures on a Hilbert Space §measure

(pn)#γc=γc(n),(pn)#γc′=γc′(n)(n∈N).(4)(p_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c}=\gamma_{c^{(n)}},\qquad(p_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c'}=\gamma_{c'^{(n)}}\qquad(n\in\mathbb{N}).\tag{4}

Step 2 (The finite-dimensional comparison). For μ∈P2(X)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X) and n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N} put

An(μ)=12∑k=1ndk mk(μ)+12∑k=1nlog⁡rk.A_{n}(\mu)=\frac12\sum_{k=1}^{n}d_{k}\,m_{k}(\mu)+\frac12\sum_{k=1}^{n}\log r_{k}.

We show: μn\mu_{n} has finite relative entropy with respect to γc(n)\gamma_{c^{(n)}} if and only if it has finite relative entropy with respect to γc′(n)\gamma_{c'^{(n)}}, and in that case

H(μn ∣ γc′(n))=H(μn ∣ γc(n))+An(μ).(5)H(\mu_{n}\,|\,\gamma_{c'^{(n)}})=H(\mu_{n}\,|\,\gamma_{c^{(n)}})+A_{n}(\mu).\tag{5}

By The Wasserstein Distance on a Hilbert Space as the Increasing Limit of the Euclidean Wasserstein Distances of the Coordinate Projections §projected, μn∈P2(Rn)\mu_{n}\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{n}), so Changing the Variances of a Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure: Equal Domains, the Shift of the Relative Entropy and the Shift of the Relative Score applies with nn in place of the dimension dd there (as in A Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure on the Noise Wasserstein Space, Rescaled Heads and Gaussian Tails: Standing Notation §euclidean), the variance vectors c(n)c^{(n)} and c′(n)c'^{(n)}, and the measure μn\mu_{n}. The equivalence is Changing the Variances of a Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure: Equal Domains, the Shift of the Relative Entropy and the Shift of the Relative Score §domains. Suppose now that μn\mu_{n} has finite relative entropy with respect to one, hence both, of the two measures. By Changing the Variances of a Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure: Equal Domains, the Shift of the Relative Entropy and the Shift of the Relative Score §entropy, the function g(u)=∣u∣c′(n)2−∣u∣c(n)2g(u)=|u|^{2}_{c'^{(n)}}-|u|^{2}_{c^{(n)}} is integrable with respect to μn\mu_{n} and

H(μn ∣ γc′(n))=H(μn ∣ γc(n))+12∫Rng dμn+Zc′(n)−Zc(n),H(\mu_{n}\,|\,\gamma_{c'^{(n)}})=H(\mu_{n}\,|\,\gamma_{c^{(n)}})+\frac12\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}g\,d\mu_{n}+Z_{c'^{(n)}}-Z_{c^{(n)}},

with the weighted squares and normalizing constants of The Diagonal Gaussian Density on Euclidean Space and Its Notation §scaling and The Diagonal Gaussian Density on Euclidean Space and Its Notation §density. We evaluate the last two terms.

By the definition of the weighted square and (0), g(u)=∑k=1nuk2(ck′−1−ck−1)=∑k=1ndkuk2g(u)=\sum_{k=1}^{n}u_{k}^{2}\bigl(c'^{-1}_{k}-c^{-1}_{k}\bigr)=\sum_{k=1}^{n}d_{k}u_{k}^{2}, so (g∘pn)(x)=∑k=1ndkxk2(g\circ p_{n})(x)=\sum_{k=1}^{n}d_{k}x_{k}^{2} for x∈Xx\in X. By Step 0 and the linearity of the integral, Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable, g∘png\circ p_{n} is integrable with respect to μ\mu with integral ∑k=1ndkmk(μ)\sum_{k=1}^{n}d_{k}m_{k}(\mu); and by the change of variables formula (claim 2 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables), ∫Rng dμn=∫Xg∘pn dμ=∑k=1ndkmk(μ)\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}g\,d\mu_{n}=\int_{X}g\circ p_{n}\,d\mu=\sum_{k=1}^{n}d_{k}m_{k}(\mu).

Write κ0\kappa_{0} for the positive constant written κ\kappa in The Diagonal Gaussian Density on Euclidean Space and Its Notation, so that Zc′(n)−Zc(n)=∑k=1n(log⁡(κ0ck′)−log⁡(κ0ck))Z_{c'^{(n)}}-Z_{c^{(n)}}=\sum_{k=1}^{n}\bigl(\log(\kappa_{0}\sqrt{c'_{k}})-\log(\kappa_{0}\sqrt{c_{k}})\bigr). Fix k≤nk\le n and let sk=rks_{k}=\sqrt{r_{k}}, the nonnegative square root of Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root; sks_{k} is positive since sk2=rk>0s_{k}^{2}=r_{k}>0. The number ck sk\sqrt{c_{k}}\,s_{k} is nonnegative with square ckrk=ck′c_{k}r_{k}=c'_{k}, so it equals ck′\sqrt{c'_{k}} by the uniqueness in Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root. By the product rule log⁡(st)=log⁡s+log⁡t\log(st)=\log s+\log t of The Natural Logarithm,

log⁡(κ0ck′)−log⁡(κ0ck)=log⁡sk=12(log⁡sk+log⁡sk)=12log⁡(sksk)=12log⁡rk.\log(\kappa_{0}\sqrt{c'_{k}})-\log(\kappa_{0}\sqrt{c_{k}})=\log s_{k}=\frac12\bigl(\log s_{k}+\log s_{k}\bigr)=\frac12\log(s_{k}s_{k})=\frac12\log r_{k}.

Summing over k≤nk\le n, Zc′(n)−Zc(n)=12∑k=1nlog⁡rkZ_{c'^{(n)}}-Z_{c^{(n)}}=\frac12\sum_{k=1}^{n}\log r_{k}. Inserting both evaluations gives (5).

Step 3 (Transfer to XX). Let μ∈P2(X)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X) be such that the series ∑kdkmk(μ)\sum_{k}d_{k}m_{k}(\mu) converges absolutely. We show: μ\mu has finite relative entropy with respect to γc\gamma_{c} if and only if it has finite relative entropy with respect to γc′\gamma_{c'}, and in that case

H(μ ∣ γc′)=H(μ ∣ γc)+12∑k=1∞dkmk(μ)+12∑k=1∞log⁡rk.(6)H(\mu\,|\,\gamma_{c'})=H(\mu\,|\,\gamma_{c})+\frac12\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}d_{k}m_{k}(\mu)+\frac12\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\log r_{k}.\tag{6}

Both series converge by An Absolutely Convergent Series of Real Numbers Converges §convergence (the second by Step 1); let T(μ)T(\mu) denote the right-hand correction 12∑kdkmk(μ)+12∑klog⁡rk\frac12\sum_{k}d_{k}m_{k}(\mu)+\frac12\sum_{k}\log r_{k} and put L(μ)=12∑k∣dk∣mk(μ)+12∑k∣log⁡rk∣L(\mu)=\frac12\sum_{k}|d_{k}|m_{k}(\mu)+\frac12\sum_{k}|\log r_{k}|, a real number. For every nn, the triangle inequality for finite sums and Series of Nonnegative Real Numbers, Comparison, and the Geometric Series §dominates give ∣An(μ)∣≤L(μ)|A_{n}(\mu)|\le L(\mu), and An(μ)→T(μ)A_{n}(\mu)\to T(\mu) as n→∞n\to\infty, being half the sum of the partial sums of two convergent series (Series of Real Numbers §convergent).

We apply Relative Entropy of the Finite-Dimensional Projections of Borel Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space: Monotonicity and Approximation with this μ\mu and with γ=γc\gamma=\gamma_{c}, respectively γ=γc′\gamma=\gamma_{c'}; by (4) the projected reference measures there are γc(n)\gamma_{c^{(n)}}, respectively γc′(n)\gamma_{c'^{(n)}}.

Suppose μ\mu has finite relative entropy with respect to γc\gamma_{c}. By Relative Entropy of the Finite-Dimensional Projections of Borel Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space: Monotonicity and Approximation §projections, for every nn the measure μn\mu_{n} has finite relative entropy with respect to γc(n)\gamma_{c^{(n)}}, with H(μn ∣ γc(n))≤H(μ ∣ γc)H(\mu_{n}\,|\,\gamma_{c^{(n)}})\le H(\mu\,|\,\gamma_{c}). By Step 2, μn\mu_{n} has finite relative entropy with respect to γc′(n)\gamma_{c'^{(n)}} and H(μn ∣ γc′(n))=H(μn ∣ γc(n))+An(μ)≤H(μ ∣ γc)+L(μ)H(\mu_{n}\,|\,\gamma_{c'^{(n)}})=H(\mu_{n}\,|\,\gamma_{c^{(n)}})+A_{n}(\mu)\le H(\mu\,|\,\gamma_{c})+L(\mu). By Relative Entropy of the Finite-Dimensional Projections of Borel Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space: Monotonicity and Approximation §bounded, μ\mu has finite relative entropy with respect to γc′\gamma_{c'}.

Conversely, suppose μ\mu has finite relative entropy with respect to γc′\gamma_{c'}. By Relative Entropy of the Finite-Dimensional Projections of Borel Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space: Monotonicity and Approximation §projections and Step 2, for every nn the measure μn\mu_{n} has finite relative entropy with respect to γc(n)\gamma_{c^{(n)}}, and H(μn ∣ γc(n))=H(μn ∣ γc′(n))−An(μ)≤H(μ ∣ γc′)+L(μ)H(\mu_{n}\,|\,\gamma_{c^{(n)}})=H(\mu_{n}\,|\,\gamma_{c'^{(n)}})-A_{n}(\mu)\le H(\mu\,|\,\gamma_{c'})+L(\mu). By Relative Entropy of the Finite-Dimensional Projections of Borel Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space: Monotonicity and Approximation §bounded, μ\mu has finite relative entropy with respect to γc\gamma_{c}.

Finally, when μ\mu has finite relative entropy with respect to both, Relative Entropy of the Finite-Dimensional Projections of Borel Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space: Monotonicity and Approximation §limit gives H(μn ∣ γc(n))→H(μ ∣ γc)H(\mu_{n}\,|\,\gamma_{c^{(n)}})\to H(\mu\,|\,\gamma_{c}) and H(μn ∣ γc′(n))→H(μ ∣ γc′)H(\mu_{n}\,|\,\gamma_{c'^{(n)}})\to H(\mu\,|\,\gamma_{c'}); letting n→∞n\to\infty in (5), with An(μ)→T(μ)A_{n}(\mu)\to T(\mu), gives (6) by uniqueness of limits.

Step 4 (Claim 2). First, every probability measure γ\gamma on a measurable space (S,S)(S,\mathcal{S}) has finite relative entropy with respect to itself, with H(γ ∣ γ)=0H(\gamma\,|\,\gamma)=0. Indeed the constant function 11 is measurable and nonnegative, and ∫S1A⋅1 dγ=∫S1A dγ=γ(A)\int_{S}\mathbf{1}_{A}\cdot1\,d\gamma=\int_{S}\mathbf{1}_{A}\,d\gamma=\gamma(A) for A∈SA\in\mathcal{S} by The Integral of an Indicator Function is the Measure of the Set, so 11 is a density of γ\gamma with respect to γ\gamma in the sense of The Radon-Nikodym Theorem for a Finite Measure and a Sigma-Finite Measure, and Uniqueness of Densities. With ϕ\phi as in Relative Entropy of Probability Measures, ϕ(1)=1⋅log⁡1=0\phi(1)=1\cdot\log1=0, because log⁡1=log⁡(1⋅1)=log⁡1+log⁡1\log1=\log(1\cdot1)=\log1+\log1 by The Natural Logarithm. So ϕ∘1\phi\circ1 is the zero function 1∅\mathbf{1}_{\emptyset}, integrable with integral γ(∅)=0\gamma(\emptyset)=0 by The Integral of an Indicator Function is the Measure of the Set, and the claim follows from Relative Entropy of Probability Measures §relative-entropy.

The measure γc′\gamma_{c'} lies in P2(X)\mathcal{P}_{2}(X) by Moments of a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on a Hilbert Space: Coordinate Covariances, Finite Second Moment, and Exponential Moments of the Squared Norm §moment, and mk(γc′)=ck′m_{k}(\gamma_{c'})=c'_{k} by Moments of a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on a Hilbert Space: Coordinate Covariances, Finite Second Moment, and Exponential Moments of the Squared Norm §coordinates (with j=kj=k), c′c' being a variance sequence by Step 1. So ∑k∣dkmk(γc′)∣=∑k∣dk∣ck′\sum_{k}|d_{k}m_{k}(\gamma_{c'})|=\sum_{k}|d_{k}|c'_{k} converges by (2), and Step 3 applies to μ=γc′\mu=\gamma_{c'}: as γc′\gamma_{c'} has finite relative entropy with respect to γc′\gamma_{c'}, it has finite relative entropy with respect to γc\gamma_{c}. By The Entropy Domain of a Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure Has the Noise Map Property §inclusion, applied with the variance sequence cc, the reference measure ρ=γc\rho=\gamma_{c} and the given κ\kappa, we get γc′∈Pρa\gamma_{c'}\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho}.

Likewise γc∈P2(X)\gamma_{c}\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X) with mk(γc)=ckm_{k}(\gamma_{c})=c_{k} by the same two claims, ∑k∣dk∣ck\sum_{k}|d_{k}|c_{k} converges, and Step 3 applied to μ=γc\mu=\gamma_{c} shows that γc\gamma_{c} has finite relative entropy with respect to γc′\gamma_{c'}. By The Entropy Domain of a Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure Has the Noise Map Property §inclusion, applied with the variance sequence c′c', the reference measure ρ′=γc′\rho'=\gamma_{c'} and κ′\kappa' (Step 1), γc∈Pρ′a\gamma_{c}\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho'}.

Now let μ∈Pρa\mu\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho}. Since also γc′∈Pρa\gamma_{c'}\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho}, The Noise Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure: Existence of Noise-Optimal Couplings, Comparison with the Quadratic Wasserstein Distance and Lower Semicontinuity §connected (with reference measure ρ\rho) shows that (μ,γc′)=(μ,ρ′)(\mu,\gamma_{c'})=(\mu,\rho') is noise-connected, i.e. μ∈Pρ′a\mu\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho'} by The Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure §space read with reference measure ρ′\rho'. Conversely let μ∈Pρ′a\mu\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho'}. Since γc∈Pρ′a\gamma_{c}\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho'}, The Noise Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure: Existence of Noise-Optimal Couplings, Comparison with the Quadratic Wasserstein Distance and Lower Semicontinuity §connected with reference measure ρ′\rho' (which lies in P2(X)\mathcal{P}_{2}(X), as shown above) shows that (μ,γc)=(μ,ρ)(\mu,\gamma_{c})=(\mu,\rho) is noise-connected, i.e. μ∈Pρa\mu\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho} by The Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure §space. Hence Pρ′a=Pρa\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho'}=\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho}, proving claim 2.

Step 5 (Claim 4, and D′=D\mathcal{D}'=\mathcal{D}). Let μ∈Pρa\mu\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho}. Then μ∈P2(X)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X) by The Noise Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure: Existence of Noise-Optimal Couplings, Comparison with the Quadratic Wasserstein Distance and Lower Semicontinuity §moments, and by Diagonal Quadratic Profiles on the Noise Wasserstein Space: Moment Bounds, a Lipschitz Estimate, the Gradient Field, and Noise Intrinsic Test Functions §profile (with b=db=d) the series ∑kdkmk(μ)\sum_{k}d_{k}m_{k}(\mu) converges absolutely, with 12∑kdkmk(μ)=Φd(μ)\frac12\sum_{k}d_{k}m_{k}(\mu)=\Phi_{d}(\mu). So Step 3 applies to μ\mu: a member μ\mu of Pρa\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho} has finite relative entropy with respect to γc\gamma_{c} if and only if it has finite relative entropy with respect to γc′\gamma_{c'}, and then

H(μ ∣ γc′)=H(μ ∣ γc)+Φd(μ)+12∑k=1∞log⁡ck′ck.(7)H(\mu\,|\,\gamma_{c'})=H(\mu\,|\,\gamma_{c})+\Phi_{d}(\mu)+\frac12\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\log\frac{c'_{k}}{c_{k}}.\tag{7}

By The Gaussian Entropy Pair on the Noise Wasserstein Space: Relative Entropy and the Noise Score Field §penalty-domain, D⊆Pρa\mathcal{D}\subseteq\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho} (with κ\kappa); read relative to γc′\gamma_{c'} (with κ′\kappa'), the same clause gives D′⊆Pρ′a\mathcal{D}'\subseteq\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho'}, which equals Pρa\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho} by Step 4. Hence every member of D\mathcal{D} lies in Pρa\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho} and has finite relative entropy with respect to γc′\gamma_{c'}, so lies in D′\mathcal{D}'; and every member of D′\mathcal{D}' lies in Pρa\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho} and has finite relative entropy with respect to γc\gamma_{c}, so lies in D\mathcal{D}. Thus D′=D\mathcal{D}'=\mathcal{D}, the first half of claim 3. For μ∈D\mu\in\mathcal{D}, (7) is the first identity of claim 4; multiplying it by β\beta and using E(μ)=βH(μ ∣ γc)\mathcal{E}(\mu)=\beta H(\mu\,|\,\gamma_{c}) and E′(μ)=βH(μ ∣ γc′)\mathcal{E}'(\mu)=\beta H(\mu\,|\,\gamma_{c'}) from The Gaussian Entropy Pair on the Noise Wasserstein Space: Relative Entropy and the Noise Score Field §pair (the latter defined since μ∈D′\mu\in\mathcal{D}') gives the second. This proves claim 4.

Step 6 (The score: DΣ′=DΣ\mathcal{D}'_{\Sigma}=\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} and claim 5). Let ν∈D=D′\nu\in\mathcal{D}=\mathcal{D}'; then ν∈Pρa⊆P2(X)\nu\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho}\subseteq\mathcal{P}_{2}(X) by Step 5 and The Noise Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure: Existence of Noise-Optimal Couplings, Comparison with the Quadratic Wasserstein Distance and Lower Semicontinuity §moments, and the classes xk∈L2(ν)x_{k}\in L^{2}(\nu) of Step 0 are available. Two facts are used.

(a) Shifting a score. Let k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}, g∈L2(ν)g\in L^{2}(\nu) and φ∈FCb1(X)\varphi\in\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X). By bilinearity of the inner product, Step 0, (0) and the linearity of the integral, Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable (the functions involved being integrable with respect to ν\nu as recorded in The Relative Score with Respect to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on a Hilbert Space),

⟨g+dkxk,φ⟩L2(ν)−∫X(xkck′φ(x)−∂kφ(x))ν(dx)=⟨g,φ⟩L2(ν)−∫X(xkckφ(x)−∂kφ(x))ν(dx),\langle g+d_{k}x_{k},\varphi\rangle_{L^{2}(\nu)}-\int_{X}\Bigl(\frac{x_{k}}{c'_{k}}\varphi(x)-\partial_{k}\varphi(x)\Bigr)\nu(dx)=\langle g,\varphi\rangle_{L^{2}(\nu)}-\int_{X}\Bigl(\frac{x_{k}}{c_{k}}\varphi(x)-\partial_{k}\varphi(x)\Bigr)\nu(dx),

since dk∫Xxkφ(x) ν(dx)−∫Xxkφ(x)(ck′−1−ck−1)ν(dx)=0d_{k}\int_{X}x_{k}\varphi(x)\,\nu(dx)-\int_{X}x_{k}\varphi(x)\bigl(c'^{-1}_{k}-c^{-1}_{k}\bigr)\nu(dx)=0. Hence, by The Relative Score with Respect to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on a Hilbert Space §score: if (ζk)k(\zeta_{k})_{k} is the relative score of ν\nu with respect to γc\gamma_{c}, then (ζk+dkxk)k(\zeta_{k}+d_{k}x_{k})_{k} is the relative score of ν\nu with respect to γc′\gamma_{c'} (take g=ζkg=\zeta_{k}); and if (ζk′)k(\zeta'_{k})_{k} is the relative score of ν\nu with respect to γc′\gamma_{c'}, then (ζk′−dkxk)k(\zeta'_{k}-d_{k}x_{k})_{k} is the relative score of ν\nu with respect to γc\gamma_{c} (take g=ζk′−dkxkg=\zeta'_{k}-d_{k}x_{k}). The relative score is unique when it exists, as recorded in that definition.

(b) The Fisher bound. For u,vu,v in a real inner product space, ∥u+v∥2=∥u∥2+2⟨u,v⟩+∥v∥2\lVert u+v\rVert^{2}=\lVert u\rVert^{2}+2\langle u,v\rangle+\lVert v\rVert^{2} and 0≤∥u−v∥2=∥u∥2−2⟨u,v⟩+∥v∥20\le\lVert u-v\rVert^{2}=\lVert u\rVert^{2}-2\langle u,v\rangle+\lVert v\rVert^{2}, whence ∥u+v∥2≤2∥u∥2+2∥v∥2\lVert u+v\rVert^{2}\le2\lVert u\rVert^{2}+2\lVert v\rVert^{2}. With Step 0, for every g∈L2(ν)g\in L^{2}(\nu), every s∈{1,−1}s\in\{1,-1\} and every kk,

ak∥g+s dkxk∥L2(ν)2≤2ak∥g∥L2(ν)2+2akdk2 mk(ν).a_{k}\lVert g+s\,d_{k}x_{k}\rVert_{L^{2}(\nu)}^{2}\le2a_{k}\lVert g\rVert_{L^{2}(\nu)}^{2}+2a_{k}d_{k}^{2}\,m_{k}(\nu).

The series ∑kakdk2mk(ν)\sum_{k}a_{k}d_{k}^{2}m_{k}(\nu) converges by Diagonal Quadratic Profiles on the Noise Wasserstein Space: Moment Bounds, a Lipschitz Estimate, the Gradient Field, and Noise Intrinsic Test Functions §moments, applied with tk=akdk2≥0t_{k}=a_{k}d_{k}^{2}\ge0 and M=B2M=B^{2}: indeed tkak=(∣dk∣ak)2≤B2t_{k}a_{k}=(|d_{k}|a_{k})^{2}\le B^{2}, and 0≤tkck=(∣dk∣ak) ∣dk∣ck≤B ∣dk∣ck0\le t_{k}c_{k}=(|d_{k}|a_{k})\,|d_{k}|c_{k}\le B\,|d_{k}|c_{k}, so ∑ktkck\sum_{k}t_{k}c_{k} converges by Series of Nonnegative Real Numbers, Comparison, and the Geometric Series §comparison and Elementary Properties of Series of Real Numbers §linearity.

Now let ν∈DΣ\nu\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}, with relative score (ζk)k(\zeta_{k})_{k} with respect to γc\gamma_{c} and finite Fisher information relative to γc\gamma_{c} with weights aa, i.e. ∑kak∥ζk∥L2(ν)2\sum_{k}a_{k}\lVert\zeta_{k}\rVert_{L^{2}(\nu)}^{2} converges (Weight Sequences and the Weighted Fisher Information Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on a Hilbert Space §information). By (a), ν\nu has the relative score (ζk+dkxk)k(\zeta_{k}+d_{k}x_{k})_{k} with respect to γc′\gamma_{c'}; by (b) with g=ζkg=\zeta_{k}, s=1s=1, Elementary Properties of Series of Real Numbers §linearity and Series of Nonnegative Real Numbers, Comparison, and the Geometric Series §comparison, the series ∑kak∥ζk+dkxk∥L2(ν)2\sum_{k}a_{k}\lVert\zeta_{k}+d_{k}x_{k}\rVert_{L^{2}(\nu)}^{2} converges, so ν\nu has finite Fisher information relative to γc′\gamma_{c'} with weights aa. As ν∈D=D′\nu\in\mathcal{D}=\mathcal{D}', The Gaussian Entropy Pair on the Noise Wasserstein Space: Relative Entropy and the Noise Score Field §score-domain (read relative to γc′\gamma_{c'}) gives ν∈DΣ′\nu\in\mathcal{D}'_{\Sigma}. Conversely, let ν∈DΣ′\nu\in\mathcal{D}'_{\Sigma}, with relative score (ζk′)k(\zeta'_{k})_{k} with respect to γc′\gamma_{c'} and ∑kak∥ζk′∥L2(ν)2\sum_{k}a_{k}\lVert\zeta'_{k}\rVert_{L^{2}(\nu)}^{2} convergent. By (a), (ζk′−dkxk)k(\zeta'_{k}-d_{k}x_{k})_{k} is the relative score of ν\nu with respect to γc\gamma_{c}, and by (b) with g=ζk′g=\zeta'_{k}, s=−1s=-1, the series ∑kak∥ζk′−dkxk∥L2(ν)2\sum_{k}a_{k}\lVert\zeta'_{k}-d_{k}x_{k}\rVert_{L^{2}(\nu)}^{2} converges; as ν∈D′=D\nu\in\mathcal{D}'=\mathcal{D}, ν∈DΣ\nu\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} by The Gaussian Entropy Pair on the Noise Wasserstein Space: Relative Entropy and the Noise Score Field §score-domain. Hence DΣ′=DΣ\mathcal{D}'_{\Sigma}=\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}, completing claim 3.

For claim 5, let ν∈DΣ\nu\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} with relative score (ζk)k(\zeta_{k})_{k} with respect to γc\gamma_{c}. By the preceding paragraph its relative score with respect to γc′\gamma_{c'} is (ζk+dkxk)k(\zeta_{k}+d_{k}x_{k})_{k}, the first assertion. By The Noise Score Field of a Measure of Finite Weighted Fisher Information: Existence, Norm, Pairing with Noise Gradients, Head Approximation and Tangency §field, read with c′c' in place of cc, Zν′aZ'^{a}_{\nu} is the unique element of L2(ν;Xa)L^{2}(\nu;X^{a}) whose coordinate along fkf_{k} is ak1/2(ζk+dkxk)a_{k}^{1/2}(\zeta_{k}+d_{k}x_{k}) for every kk. On the other hand, by The Noise Score Field of a Measure of Finite Weighted Fisher Information: Existence, Norm, Pairing with Noise Gradients, Head Approximation and Tangency §field the coordinate of ZνaZ^{a}_{\nu} along fkf_{k} is ak1/2ζka_{k}^{1/2}\zeta_{k}, and by Diagonal Quadratic Profiles on the Noise Wasserstein Space: Moment Bounds, a Lipschitz Estimate, the Gradient Field, and Noise Intrinsic Test Functions §field (with b=db=d, ν∈Pρa\nu\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho}) that of Vd(ν)V_{d}(\nu) is the class of x↦ak1/2dkxkx\mapsto a_{k}^{1/2}d_{k}x_{k}, that is ak1/2dkxka_{k}^{1/2}d_{k}x_{k}; by the additivity of coordinates in The Space of Square-Integrable Hilbert-Valued Maps is a Real Hilbert Space: Coordinates and Synthesis §coordinates, the coordinate of Zνa+Vd(ν)Z^{a}_{\nu}+V_{d}(\nu) along fkf_{k} is ak1/2ζk+ak1/2dkxk=ak1/2(ζk+dkxk)a_{k}^{1/2}\zeta_{k}+a_{k}^{1/2}d_{k}x_{k}=a_{k}^{1/2}(\zeta_{k}+d_{k}x_{k}). By the uniqueness just quoted, Zν′a=Zνa+Vd(ν)Z'^{a}_{\nu}=Z^{a}_{\nu}+V_{d}(\nu). Finally, by The Gaussian Entropy Pair on the Noise Wasserstein Space: Relative Entropy and the Noise Score Field §pair and the vector space axioms of L2(ν;Xa)L^{2}(\nu;X^{a}) (The Space of Square-Integrable Hilbert-Valued Maps is a Real Hilbert Space: Coordinates and Synthesis §hilbert),

Σ′(ν)=βZν′a=βZνa+βVd(ν)=Σ(ν)+βVd(ν).\Sigma'(\nu)=\beta Z'^{a}_{\nu}=\beta Z^{a}_{\nu}+\beta V_{d}(\nu)=\Sigma(\nu)+\beta V_{d}(\nu).

This proves claim 5 and completes the proof.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…