TheoremBase

Every lower sum lies below the lower integral and every upper sum above the upper integral; so small gaps U-L force the two integrals to agree, and conversely partitions nearly attaining both integrals combine, through their union, into one partition with a small gap.

Proof

Let L(f)\mathcal{L}(f) and U(f)\mathcal{U}(f) be the set of lower sums and the set of upper sums of ff, and let λ=sup⁡L(f)\lambda=\sup\mathcal{L}(f) and υ=inf⁡U(f)\upsilon=\inf\mathcal{U}(f) be the lower and the upper integral of ff over [a,b][a,b], The Riemann Integral on a Closed Interval via Lower and Upper Integrals (iii); they exist and are the numbers λ∗\lambda_{*} and λ∗\lambda^{*} of Bounds for Darboux Sums, Monotonicity under Refinement, the Supremum of the Lower Sums and the Infimum of the Upper Sums, and Concatenation of Partitions (iv), so λ≤υ\lambda\le\upsilon. By The Riemann Integral on a Closed Interval via Lower and Upper Integrals (i) and The Riemann Integral on a Closed Interval via Lower and Upper Integrals (ii), the elements of L(f)\mathcal{L}(f) and U(f)\mathcal{U}(f) are the sums L(f,P)L(f,P) and U(f,P)U(f,P), PP ranging over the partitions of [a,b][a,b]. As λ\lambda is an upper bound of L(f)\mathcal{L}(f) and υ\upsilon a lower bound of U(f)\mathcal{U}(f), by Bounds, Least and Greatest Elements, Suprema and Infima for a Partial Order (iv),

L(f,P)≤λ≤υ≤U(f,P)for every partition P of [a,b].(1)L(f,P)\le\lambda\le\upsilon\le U(f,P)\qquad\text{for every partition }P\text{ of }[a,b].\tag{1}

Proof of (ii). If ff is integrable, then ∫abf=λ=υ\int_{a}^{b}f=\lambda=\upsilon by The Riemann Integral on a Closed Interval via Lower and Upper Integrals (iv) and The Riemann Integral on a Closed Interval via Lower and Upper Integrals (v), and (1) gives L(f,P)≤∫abf≤U(f,P)L(f,P)\le\int_{a}^{b}f\le U(f,P).

Proof of (i). Suppose that for every real ε>0\varepsilon>0 there is a partition PP with U(f,P)−L(f,P)<εU(f,P)-L(f,P)<\varepsilon. Let ε>0\varepsilon>0 and choose such a PP. By (1), 0≤υ−λ≤U(f,P)−L(f,P)<ε0\le\upsilon-\lambda\le U(f,P)-L(f,P)<\varepsilon. As ε>0\varepsilon>0 was arbitrary, υ−λ=0\upsilon-\lambda=0 by Arbitrary Positive Slack, and Approximation of Suprema and Infima, in the Real Numbers (iii), so λ=υ\lambda=\upsilon and ff is integrable on [a,b][a,b] by The Riemann Integral on a Closed Interval via Lower and Upper Integrals (iv).

Conversely, let ff be integrable, so λ=υ=∫abf\lambda=\upsilon=\int_{a}^{b}f, and let ε>0\varepsilon>0. The set P0={a}∪{b}P_{0}=\{a\}\cup\{b\} is finite by Finite Sets: the Pigeonhole Principle, Uniqueness of the Length, Subsets, Unions, Products, Images, Bounded Sets of Natural Numbers, Extreme Elements, Sets of Maps, Finite Unions and Finite Choice (iii) and Finite Sets: the Pigeonhole Principle, Uniqueness of the Length, Subsets, Unions, Products, Images, Bounded Sets of Natural Numbers, Extreme Elements, Sets of Maps, Finite Unions and Finite Choice (v), and a,b∈[a,b]a,b\in[a,b] (Basic Facts about Intervals of the Real Line (v)), so it is a partition of [a,b][a,b] by Partitions of a Closed Interval, the Set of Partitions, and Refinements (i); thus L(f,P0)∈L(f)L(f,P_{0})\in\mathcal{L}(f) and U(f,P0)∈U(f)U(f,P_{0})\in\mathcal{U}(f), and by Bounds for Darboux Sums, Monotonicity under Refinement, the Supremum of the Lower Sums and the Infimum of the Upper Sums, and Concatenation of Partitions (iii) U(f,P0)U(f,P_{0}) is an upper bound of L(f)\mathcal{L}(f) and L(f,P0)L(f,P_{0}) a lower bound of U(f)\mathcal{U}(f). The real number ε/2\varepsilon/2 satisfies 0<ε/20<\varepsilon/2 and ε/2+ε/2=ε\varepsilon/2+\varepsilon/2=\varepsilon (Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares (vii)). First, as L(f)\mathcal{L}(f) is nonempty and bounded above, Arbitrary Positive Slack, and Approximation of Suprema and Infima, in the Real Numbers (v), applied with ε/2\varepsilon/2, gives s∈L(f)s\in\mathcal{L}(f) with λ−ε/2<s\lambda-\varepsilon/2<s, and by The Riemann Integral on a Closed Interval via Lower and Upper Integrals (i) s=L(f,P1)s=L(f,P_{1}) for a partition P1P_{1} of [a,b][a,b]; so λ−ε/2<L(f,P1)\lambda-\varepsilon/2<L(f,P_{1}). Then, as U(f)\mathcal{U}(f) is nonempty and bounded below, Arbitrary Positive Slack, and Approximation of Suprema and Infima, in the Real Numbers (vii), applied with ε/2\varepsilon/2, gives s′∈U(f)s'\in\mathcal{U}(f) with s′<υ+ε/2s'<\upsilon+\varepsilon/2, and by The Riemann Integral on a Closed Interval via Lower and Upper Integrals (ii) s′=U(f,P2)s'=U(f,P_{2}) for a partition P2P_{2} of [a,b][a,b]; so U(f,P2)<υ+ε/2U(f,P_{2})<\upsilon+\varepsilon/2. Let P=P1∪P2P=P_{1}\cup P_{2}, a partition of [a,b][a,b] refining P1P_{1} and P2P_{2} by The Increasing Listing of a Partition: Endpoints, Lengths, Covering, Unions, Inserting a Point, Concatenation and Uniform Partitions (v). By Bounds for Darboux Sums, Monotonicity under Refinement, the Supremum of the Lower Sums and the Infimum of the Upper Sums, and Concatenation of Partitions (ii), L(f,P1)≤L(f,P)L(f,P_{1})\le L(f,P) and U(f,P)≤U(f,P2)U(f,P)\le U(f,P_{2}). Hence

U(f,P)−L(f,P)≤U(f,P2)−L(f,P1)<(∫abf+ε2)−(∫abf−ε2)=ε.U(f,P)-L(f,P)\le U(f,P_{2})-L(f,P_{1})<\Big(\int_{a}^{b}f+\frac{\varepsilon}{2}\Big)-\Big(\int_{a}^{b}f-\frac{\varepsilon}{2}\Big)=\varepsilon .

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…