TheoremBase

Linearity is linearity of the integral and the cost bound is the mean-square Cauchy-Schwarz inequality on the coupling; for vanishing, the field is truncated at level M and pushed forward along the wrapped small displacement x -> pi(x + t hM(x))h_M(x)), whose wrapped displacement is exactly t hM(x)h_M(x) once tM < 1/2, so the pairing is t AMA_M against cost t2t^2 AMA_M, the first-order hypothesis forces AMA_M = 0 for every M, and letting M run through the natural numbers gives eta = 0 almost everywhere.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement, and is applied here to the data named in the statement above; results stated for a Euclidean dimension nn, or for a natural number dd with 1≤d1\le d, are applied with that number equal to the dimension dd fixed in Optimal Transport on the Flat Torus: Standing Notation §conventions.

Preliminaries. Measures in P(Td)\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) belong to P(Rd)\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) by Probability Measures on the Flat Torus, the Torus Cost of a Coupling, the Torus Wasserstein Distance and Optimal Couplings §measures. For ν∈P(Td)\nu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) and γ∈Π(μ,ν)\gamma\in\Pi(\mu,\nu), the measure γ\gamma belongs to P(Rd+d)\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{d+d}) and satisfies (pr1)#γ=μ(\mathrm{pr}_{1})_{\#}\gamma=\mu and (pr2)#γ=ν(\mathrm{pr}_{2})_{\#}\gamma=\nu by Couplings of Two Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Their Quadratic Cost §coupling; the projections are Borel by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §projections. By Optimal Transport on the Flat Torus: Standing Notation §fields, L2(μ;Rd)L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d}) is the space of classes of square-integrable random vectors on (Rd,B(Rd),μ)(\mathbb{R}^{d},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d}),\mu): a representative of η∈L2(μ;Rd)\eta\in L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d}), again written η\eta, is a Borel map Rd→Rd\mathbb{R}^{d}\to\mathbb{R}^{d} (Random Vector and Its Law §vector) with ∫Rd∥η∥2 dμ<∞\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\lVert\eta\rVert^{2}\,d\mu<\infty, and ∥η∥μ=∫Rd∥η∥2 dμ\lVert\eta\rVert_{\mu}=\sqrt{\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\lVert\eta\rVert^{2}\,d\mu} by The Space of Square-Integrable Random Vectors §inner-product. By The Space of Square-Integrable Random Vectors §classes, if η,η′\eta,\eta' are represented by Borel maps and a,ba,b are real, then aη+bη′a\eta+b\eta' is represented by the pointwise combination x↦a η(x)+b η′(x)x\mapsto a\,\eta(x)+b\,\eta'(x). For such a representative write gη(w)=η(pr1(w))⋅ϖ(pr2(w)−pr1(w))g_{\eta}(w)=\eta(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w))\cdot\varpi(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w)-\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w)) for w∈Rd+dw\in\mathbb{R}^{d+d}; by the preamble of The Torus Displacement Pairing of a Vector Field Along a Coupling this function is Borel and γ\gamma-integrable for every coupling γ\gamma as above, JT(η,γ)=∫gη dγ\mathcal{J}_{\mathbb{T}}(\eta,\gamma)=\int g_{\eta}\,d\gamma by The Torus Displacement Pairing of a Vector Field Along a Coupling §pairing, and the value does not depend on the representative. Finally dT(x,y)=∥ϖ(y−x)∥d_{\mathbb{T}}(x,y)=\lVert\varpi(y-x)\rVert for all x,y∈Rdx,y\in\mathbb{R}^{d} by The Wrapped Displacement and the Flat Torus Distance §distance, and by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §measures a nonnegative Borel function with values in R\mathbb{R} is integrated as a map into [0,∞][0,\infty], so its integral as an integrable function, when it is integrable, is that integral.

Claim 1. Let ν\nu, γ\gamma, η\eta, η′\eta', aa, bb be as in claim 1, with Borel representatives η,η′\eta,\eta'. By the Preliminaries, aη+bη′a\eta+b\eta' is represented by x↦a η(x)+b η′(x)x\mapsto a\,\eta(x)+b\,\eta'(x), so JT(aη+bη′,γ)\mathcal{J}_{\mathbb{T}}(a\eta+b\eta',\gamma) is the integral of the function whose value at ww is (a η(pr1(w))+b η′(pr1(w)))⋅ϖ(pr2(w)−pr1(w))\bigl(a\,\eta(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w))+b\,\eta'(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w))\bigr)\cdot\varpi(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w)-\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w)). By claims 2 and 4 of Bilinearity and Symmetry of the Dot Product on Rn\mathbb{R}^n this value equals a gη(w)+b gη′(w)a\,g_{\eta}(w)+b\,g_{\eta'}(w) for every ww. Both gηg_{\eta} and gη′g_{\eta'} are γ\gamma-integrable, so claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral gives

JT(aη+bη′,γ)=a∫gη dγ+b∫gη′ dγ=a JT(η,γ)+b JT(η′,γ).\mathcal{J}_{\mathbb{T}}(a\eta+b\eta',\gamma)=a\int g_{\eta}\,d\gamma+b\int g_{\eta'}\,d\gamma=a\,\mathcal{J}_{\mathbb{T}}(\eta,\gamma)+b\,\mathcal{J}_{\mathbb{T}}(\eta',\gamma).

Claim 2. Let ν\nu, γ\gamma and η\eta be as in claim 2, with a Borel representative η\eta. The triple (Rd+d,B(Rd+d),γ)(\mathbb{R}^{d+d},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d+d}),\gamma) is a probability space, since γ(Rd+d)=1\gamma(\mathbb{R}^{d+d})=1 by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §measures. Define X,Y:Rd+d→RX,Y:\mathbb{R}^{d+d}\to\mathbb{R} by X(w)=∥η(pr1(w))∥X(w)=\lVert\eta(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w))\rVert and Y(w)=dT(pr1(w),pr2(w))Y(w)=d_{\mathbb{T}}(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w),\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w)). The composite η∘pr1\eta\circ\mathrm{pr}_{1} is Borel as a composition of Borel maps (Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §borel-maps), and the norm x↦∥x∥x\mapsto\lVert x\rVert is Borel by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §functions, so XX is Borel; YY is Borel by The Flat Torus Distance: Minimality of the Wrapped Displacement, Periodicity, the Metric on the Unit Cell and the Lipschitz Bound §lipschitz. Thus XX and YY are nonnegative random variables on this probability space. The function ∥η∥2\lVert\eta\rVert^{2} on Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} is nonnegative and Borel by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §functions, and the change-of-variables formula of Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §pushforward, applied to pr1\mathrm{pr}_{1} with (pr1)#γ=μ(\mathrm{pr}_{1})_{\#}\gamma=\mu, gives

∫Rd+dX2 dγ=∫Rd∥η∥2 dμ=∥η∥μ2<∞,\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d+d}}X^{2}\,d\gamma=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\lVert\eta\rVert^{2}\,d\mu=\lVert\eta\rVert_{\mu}^{2}<\infty,

while ∫Y2 dγ=IT(γ)≤d/4\int Y^{2}\,d\gamma=I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma)\le d/4 by Probability Measures on the Flat Torus, the Torus Cost of a Coupling, the Torus Wasserstein Distance and Optimal Couplings §cost. Hence XX and YY are square-integrable, with mean-square norms ∥X∥2=∥η∥μ\lVert X\rVert_{2}=\lVert\eta\rVert_{\mu} and ∥Y∥2=IT(γ)\lVert Y\rVert_{2}=\sqrt{I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma)}, and by the same definition the product XYXY is integrable with respect to γ\gamma.

For every ww, the Cauchy--Schwarz inequality Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality for the Euclidean Dot Product and the Preliminaries give

∣gη(w)∣≤∥η(pr1(w))∥ ∥ϖ(pr2(w)−pr1(w))∥=X(w) Y(w).|g_{\eta}(w)|\le\lVert\eta(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w))\rVert\,\lVert\varpi(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w)-\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w))\rVert=X(w)\,Y(w).

The functions ∣gη∣|g_{\eta}| and XYXY are nonnegative and Borel by claims 4 and 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions. Therefore

∣JT(η,γ)∣=∣∫gη dγ∣≤∫∣gη∣ dγ≤∫XY dγ=E[XY]≤∣E[XY]∣≤∥X∥2 ∥Y∥2=∥η∥μIT(γ),|\mathcal{J}_{\mathbb{T}}(\eta,\gamma)|=\Bigl|\int g_{\eta}\,d\gamma\Bigr|\le\int|g_{\eta}|\,d\gamma\le\int XY\,d\gamma=\mathbb{E}[XY]\le\bigl|\mathbb{E}[XY]\bigr|\le\lVert X\rVert_{2}\,\lVert Y\rVert_{2}=\lVert\eta\rVert_{\mu}\sqrt{I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma)} ,

where the first inequality is claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, the second is the monotonicity in claim 1 of that theorem, the equality with the expectation holds by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §probability-space and the Preliminaries, the next inequality is claim 3 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, and the last inequality is claim 1 of Cauchy-Schwarz and Triangle Inequalities for the Mean-Square Norm.

Claim 3. Let η\eta be as in claim 3, fix a Borel representative, again written η\eta, and let 0L20_{L^{2}} denote the zero element of L2(μ;Rd)L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d}). A natural number MM is read as a real number through the canonical map; so read, it is positive by claim 3 of Properties of the Canonical Map from the Natural Numbers to an Ordered Field. Write 12=2−1\tfrac12=2^{-1}, which exists and is positive by claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field.

Step 3a: truncations. Let ϕ(x)=∥η(x)∥\phi(x)=\lVert\eta(x)\rVert; as in claim 2, ϕ:Rd→R\phi:\mathbb{R}^{d}\to\mathbb{R} is nonnegative and Borel. Fix M∈NM\in\mathbb{N}. By The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §markov, applied in the measure space (Rd,B(Rd),μ)(\mathbb{R}^{d},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d}),\mu) to ϕ\phi, read as a measurable map into [0,∞][0,\infty] as in the Preliminaries, and to the positive real MM, the set {x:M≤ϕ(x)}\{x:M\le\phi(x)\} is Borel; so is its complement

BM={x∈Rd:ϕ(x)<M},B_{M}=\{x\in\mathbb{R}^{d}:\phi(x)<M\},

the order of R\mathbb{R} being total. Define hM:Rd→Rdh_{M}:\mathbb{R}^{d}\to\mathbb{R}^{d} by hM(x)=1BM(x) η(x)h_{M}(x)=\mathbf{1}_{B_{M}}(x)\,\eta(x). Its components 1BMηi\mathbf{1}_{B_{M}}\eta_{i} are Borel by claims 1 and 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions, the components ηi\eta_{i} of the Borel map η\eta being Borel by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §borel-maps; hence hMh_{M} is Borel by the same clause. If x∈BMx\in B_{M}, then hM(x)=η(x)h_{M}(x)=\eta(x) and ∥hM(x)∥=ϕ(x)<M\lVert h_{M}(x)\rVert=\phi(x)<M; if x∉BMx\notin B_{M}, then hM(x)=0 η(x)h_{M}(x)=0\,\eta(x) is the origin and ∥hM(x)∥=0<M\lVert h_{M}(x)\rVert=0<M by claim 3 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n. So

∥hM(x)∥<M(x∈Rd).(1)\lVert h_{M}(x)\rVert<M\qquad(x\in\mathbb{R}^{d}). \tag{1}

Put uM(x)=1BM(x) ∥η(x)∥2u_{M}(x)=\mathbf{1}_{B_{M}}(x)\,\lVert\eta(x)\rVert^{2}. In both cases above, by claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n and claim 5 of Bilinearity and Symmetry of the Dot Product on Rn\mathbb{R}^n (the dot product with the origin being 00 by homogeneity with the scalar 00),

η(x)⋅hM(x)=∥hM(x)∥2=uM(x)(x∈Rd).(2)\eta(x)\cdot h_{M}(x)=\lVert h_{M}(x)\rVert^{2}=u_{M}(x)\qquad(x\in\mathbb{R}^{d}). \tag{2}

The function uMu_{M} is nonnegative and Borel (claim 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions and Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §functions) and satisfies uM≤∥η∥2u_{M}\le\lVert\eta\rVert^{2} pointwise, so, by the monotonicity in claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral,

AM=∫RduM dμsatisfies0≤AM≤∥η∥μ2<∞;A_{M}=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}u_{M}\,d\mu\quad\text{satisfies}\quad0\le A_{M}\le\lVert\eta\rVert_{\mu}^{2}<\infty ;

in particular uMu_{M} is μ\mu-integrable.

Step 3b: displacement couplings. Keep MM fixed and let tt be a real number with 0<t0<t and tM<12tM<\tfrac12. Let id\mathrm{id} be the identity map of Rd\mathbb{R}^{d}, which is Borel, as recorded in the preamble of Couplings on Euclidean Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, and the Lipschitz Bound, and define S:Rd→RdS:\mathbb{R}^{d}\to\mathbb{R}^{d} by S(x)=π(x+t hM(x))S(x)=\pi\bigl(x+t\,h_{M}(x)\bigr). The map x↦x+t hM(x)x\mapsto x+t\,h_{M}(x) is Borel, its iith component being the sum of the iith component of id\mathrm{id} and tt times the iith component of hMh_{M} (claim 2 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions and Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §borel-maps); π\pi is Borel by The Half-Open Unit Cell Tiles Euclidean Space §wrap; so SS is Borel as a composition (Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §borel-maps).

(i) Put νt=S#μ\nu_{t}=S_{\#}\mu, which lies in P(Rd)\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §pushforward. Since S(x)∈QS(x)\in Q for every xx by The Half-Open Unit Cell Tiles Euclidean Space §wrap, and QQ is Borel by The Half-Open Unit Cell Tiles Euclidean Space §cell, one has νt(Q)=μ(S−1(Q))=μ(Rd)=1\nu_{t}(Q)=\mu(S^{-1}(Q))=\mu(\mathbb{R}^{d})=1; so νt∈P(Td)\nu_{t}\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) by Probability Measures on the Flat Torus, the Torus Cost of a Coupling, the Torus Wasserstein Distance and Optimal Couplings §measures.

(ii) Put γt=(id,S)#μ\gamma_{t}=(\mathrm{id},S)_{\#}\mu. By Couplings on Euclidean Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, and the Lipschitz Bound §pushforward, applied to the Borel maps id\mathrm{id} and SS, γt∈Π(id#μ,S#μ)=Π(μ,νt)\gamma_{t}\in\Pi(\mathrm{id}_{\#}\mu,S_{\#}\mu)=\Pi(\mu,\nu_{t}), since id#μ(B)=μ(id−1(B))=μ(B)\mathrm{id}_{\#}\mu(B)=\mu(\mathrm{id}^{-1}(B))=\mu(B) for every Borel BB (Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §pushforward). The pairing (id,S)(\mathrm{id},S) is Borel by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §pairing, and pr1((id,S)(x))=x\mathrm{pr}_{1}((\mathrm{id},S)(x))=x, pr2((id,S)(x))=S(x)\mathrm{pr}_{2}((\mathrm{id},S)(x))=S(x) by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §projections.

(iii) Fix x∈Rdx\in\mathbb{R}^{d}. By The Half-Open Unit Cell Tiles Euclidean Space §wrap, S(x)=x+t hM(x)−mS(x)=x+t\,h_{M}(x)-m for an integer vector m∈Zdm\in\mathbb{Z}^{d}, so S(x)−x=t hM(x)+kS(x)-x=t\,h_{M}(x)+k with k=−mk=-m, whose coordinates −mi-m_{i} are integers, so that k∈Zdk\in\mathbb{Z}^{d} (Lattice-Periodic Functions and the Periodic Function Classes §lattice). By The Flat Torus Distance: Minimality of the Wrapped Displacement, Periodicity, the Metric on the Unit Cell and the Lipschitz Bound §range, ϖ(S(x)−x)=ϖ(t hM(x))\varpi(S(x)-x)=\varpi(t\,h_{M}(x)). Let i∈[d]i\in[d] and let si=t hM(x)is_{i}=t\,h_{M}(x)_{i} be the iith component of t hM(x)t\,h_{M}(x) (Scalar Multiple of a Point of Rn\mathbb{R}^n). By claims 4 and 5 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, with ∣t∣=t|t|=t as 0≤t0\le t (Absolute Value in an Ordered Field), and by (1) and claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field,

∣si∣≤∥t hM(x)∥=t ∥hM(x)∥≤tM<12,|s_{i}|\le\lVert t\,h_{M}(x)\rVert=t\,\lVert h_{M}(x)\rVert\le tM<\tfrac12 ,

so ∣si∣<12|s_{i}|<\tfrac12 by claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, that is −12<si<12-\tfrac12<s_{i}<\tfrac12 by claim 9 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field. Adding 12\tfrac12 (claim 1 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field) and using −12+12=0-\tfrac12+\tfrac12=0 and 12+12=1\tfrac12+\tfrac12=1 (claim 8 there, with the positive element 11) gives 0<si+12<10<s_{i}+\tfrac12<1. Thus the integer 00 satisfies 0≤si+12<0+10\le s_{i}+\tfrac12<0+1, so ⌊si+12⌋=0\lfloor s_{i}+\tfrac12\rfloor=0 by the uniqueness in Existence and Uniqueness of the Integer Part of a Real Number, and ϖ(t hM(x))i=si−0=si\varpi(t\,h_{M}(x))_{i}=s_{i}-0=s_{i} by The Wrapped Displacement and the Flat Torus Distance §displacement. By claim 1 of Euclidean Points as Tuples of Real Numbers,

ϖ(S(x)−x)=t hM(x)(x∈Rd).(3)\varpi\bigl(S(x)-x\bigr)=t\,h_{M}(x)\qquad(x\in\mathbb{R}^{d}). \tag{3}

(iv) By the change-of-variables formula of Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §pushforward, applied to the Borel map (id,S)(\mathrm{id},S) and to the γt\gamma_{t}-integrable function gηg_{\eta} of the Preliminaries, and by (ii), (3), claim 5 of Bilinearity and Symmetry of the Dot Product on Rn\mathbb{R}^n and (2),

JT(η,γt)=∫Rdη(x)⋅ϖ(S(x)−x) μ(dx)=∫Rdt (η(x)⋅hM(x)) μ(dx)=∫Rdt uM dμ=t AM,\mathcal{J}_{\mathbb{T}}(\eta,\gamma_{t})=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\eta(x)\cdot\varpi\bigl(S(x)-x\bigr)\,\mu(dx)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}t\,\bigl(\eta(x)\cdot h_{M}(x)\bigr)\,\mu(dx)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}t\,u_{M}\,d\mu=t\,A_{M},

the last equality by claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral with the nonnegative scalar tt and the last clause of the Preliminaries. Likewise, the same formula applied to the nonnegative Borel integrand of Probability Measures on the Flat Torus, the Torus Cost of a Coupling, the Torus Wasserstein Distance and Optimal Couplings §cost, together with (ii), the Preliminaries, (3), claim 5 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n and (2), gives

IT(γt)=∫RddT(x,S(x))2 μ(dx)=∫Rd∥t hM(x)∥2 μ(dx)=∫Rdt2 uM dμ=t2AM,I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma_{t})=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}d_{\mathbb{T}}\bigl(x,S(x)\bigr)^{2}\,\mu(dx)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\lVert t\,h_{M}(x)\rVert^{2}\,\mu(dx)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}t^{2}\,u_{M}\,d\mu=t^{2}A_{M},

again by claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, now with the nonnegative scalar t2t^{2}.

Step 3c: AM=0A_{M}=0 for every M∈NM\in\mathbb{N}. Fix MM and suppose, for a contradiction, that 0<AM0<A_{M}. Let s=AMs=\sqrt{A_{M}}, the nonnegative square root; s≠0s\ne0, since otherwise AM=s2=0A_{M}=s^{2}=0, so 0<s0<s. Let ε\varepsilon be an arbitrary positive real number, and, in this order, let θ\theta be a positive real supplied by the hypothesis of claim 3 for this ε\varepsilon; then put

t1=M−1⋅12⋅12,t2=θ s−1⋅12.t_{1}=M^{-1}\cdot\tfrac12\cdot\tfrac12,\qquad t_{2}=\theta\,s^{-1}\cdot\tfrac12 .

Both are positive by claims 7, 5 and 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, and t1M=12⋅12<12t_{1}M=\tfrac12\cdot\tfrac12<\tfrac12 and t2s=θ⋅12<θt_{2}s=\theta\cdot\tfrac12<\theta by claim 8 there (applied to the positive elements 12\tfrac12 and θ\theta). Let tt be the lesser of t1t_{1} and t2t_{2}, supplied by claim 9 there; tt equals one of them, so 0<t0<t, and t≤t1t\le t_{1}, t≤t2t\le t_{2}. By claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field with the nonnegative multipliers MM and ss, and claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, tM≤t1M<12tM\le t_{1}M<\tfrac12 and ts≤t2s<θts\le t_{2}s<\theta. So Step 3b applies to tt, and IT(γt)=t2AM=(ts)2<θ2I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma_{t})=t^{2}A_{M}=(ts)^{2}<\theta^{2} by claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field, the numbers tsts and θ\theta being nonnegative. The hypothesis of claim 3, applied to νt∈P(Td)\nu_{t}\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) and γt∈Π(μ,νt)\gamma_{t}\in\Pi(\mu,\nu_{t}), yields ∣JT(η,γt)∣≤εIT(γt)|\mathcal{J}_{\mathbb{T}}(\eta,\gamma_{t})|\le\varepsilon\sqrt{I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma_{t})}. Here IT(γt)=ts\sqrt{I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma_{t})}=ts by Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root, tsts being nonnegative with square IT(γt)I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma_{t}), and ∣JT(η,γt)∣=∣tAM∣=tAM=t s2|\mathcal{J}_{\mathbb{T}}(\eta,\gamma_{t})|=|tA_{M}|=tA_{M}=t\,s^{2} by Step 3b and Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, as 0<tAM0<tA_{M} by claim 5 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. Hence t s⋅s≤ε⋅tst\,s\cdot s\le\varepsilon\cdot ts. The number tsts is positive by claim 5 there, so its inverse exists and is positive by claim 7 there, and multiplying by it (claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field) gives s≤εs\le\varepsilon. As ε\varepsilon was an arbitrary positive real and 0≤s0\le s, Comparison of Real Numbers with Arbitrary Positive Slack §vanishing gives s=0s=0, contradicting 0<s0<s. Hence AM≤0A_{M}\le0, the order being total, and AM=0A_{M}=0 since 0≤AM0\le A_{M}.

Step 3d: conclusion. For every M∈NM\in\mathbb{N}, the nonnegative Borel function uMu_{M} has ∫uM dμ=AM=0\int u_{M}\,d\mu=A_{M}=0, so uM(x)=0u_{M}(x)=0 for μ\mu-almost every xx by The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §vanishing. By The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §null-union, the set NN of points xx at which uM(x)≠0u_{M}(x)\ne0 for at least one M∈NM\in\mathbb{N} is μ\mu-null. Let x∈Rd∖Nx\in\mathbb{R}^{d}\setminus N. By claim 1 of The Archimedean Property of the Real Numbers there is M∈NM\in\mathbb{N} with ϕ(x)<M\phi(x)<M, that is, x∈BMx\in B_{M}; then ∥η(x)∥2=uM(x)=0\lVert\eta(x)\rVert^{2}=u_{M}(x)=0. Thus the nonnegative Borel function ∥η∥2\lVert\eta\rVert^{2} vanishes off the null set NN, and ∫Rd∥η∥2 dμ=0\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\lVert\eta\rVert^{2}\,d\mu=0 by The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §null-integral. By the Preliminaries, ∥η∥μ\lVert\eta\rVert_{\mu} is the nonnegative square root of 00, which is 00 by Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root. Since L2(μ;Rd)L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d}) is a real inner product space with norm ∥⋅∥μ\lVert\cdot\rVert_{\mu} (The Space of Square-Integrable Random Vectors §inner-product), Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space §vanishing gives η=0L2\eta=0_{L^{2}}.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…