TheoremBase

Linear functionals: the published lift lemma gives the C1C^1 lift and the translation regularity, tangency of Df gives property (b), and the translation Hessian is computed by differentiating under the integral. Quadratic kernel functionals: the lift is expanded to first order with the uniform Taylor remainder of K along the law of the pair (X,H), Fubini and the oddness of DK produce the factor 2, and the gradient map and the functional itself are shown Lipschitz.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. Throughout, a function of class C1C^{1} on Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} and its partial derivatives are continuous (clause 1 of Functions of Class Cᵏ on an Open Subset of ℝⁿ, claim 3 of Euclidean Space Is Open in Itself), hence Borel (claim 3 of The Borel Sigma-Algebra of a Euclidean Space as a Product, and Measurability of Projections, Sequentially Continuous Maps, and Open and Closed Sets); a map Rn→Rd\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R}^{d} is Borel when its components are, and compositions of Borel maps are Borel (Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation (ii)); a bounded Borel function is integrable with respect to every probability measure (Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation (iii)); the integral of a constant against a probability measure is that constant (Simple Functions, Nonnegative Simple Functions, and the Simple Integral); "change of variables" refers to Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation (iv); ∥x∥2=∑ixi2\lVert x\rVert^{2}=\sum_{i}x_{i}^{2} and ∣xi∣≤∥x∥|x_{i}|\le\lVert x\rVert (claims 1 and 4 of Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square); and for u,w∈Rdu,w\in\mathbb{R}^{d}, ∣u⋅w∣≤∥u∥∥w∥|u\cdot w|\le\lVert u\rVert\lVert w\rVert and ∥u−w∥2≤2∥u∥2+2∥w∥2\lVert u-w\rVert^{2}\le2\lVert u\rVert^{2}+2\lVert w\rVert^{2} (Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets (iv)). For a function gg of class C1C^{1} on Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} with ∣∂ig∣≤C|\partial_{i}g|\le C for all ii, part (i) of Multivariate Taylor Expansion with Uniform Second-Order Remainder (the segment between any two points lies in Rd\mathbb{R}^{d}, and the Euclidean distance of uu and ww is ∥u−w∥\lVert u-w\rVert by claim 2 of Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square) gives

∣g(u)−g(w)∣≤d C ∥u−w∥(u,w∈Rd),(Lip)|g(u)-g(w)|\le\sqrt{d}\,C\,\lVert u-w\rVert\qquad(u,w\in\mathbb{R}^{d}),\tag{Lip}

and if gg is of class C2C^{2} with ∣∂j∂ig∣≤C|\partial_{j}\partial_{i}g|\le C, part (ii) gives, with Dg(u)⋅w=∑i∂ig(u)wiDg(u)\cdot w=\sum_{i}\partial_{i}g(u)w_{i},

∣g(u+w)−g(u)−Dg(u)⋅w∣≤12 d C ∥w∥2(u,w∈Rd).(Tay)|g(u+w)-g(u)-Dg(u)\cdot w|\le\tfrac12\,d\,C\,\lVert w\rVert^{2}\qquad(u,w\in\mathbb{R}^{d}).\tag{Tay}

For a Borel map Γ:Rd→Rd\Gamma:\mathbb{R}^{d}\to\mathbb{R}^{d} with ∣Γi∣≤C|\Gamma_{i}|\le C one has ∥Γ∥2≤dC2\lVert\Gamma\rVert^{2}\le dC^{2} (claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field, claim 1 of Comparison and Absolute Value Bounds for Finite Sums of Real Numbers), so its class lies in L2(μ;Rd)L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d}) for every μ∈P(Rd)\mu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{d}); for X∈L2(Ω;Rd)X\in L^{2}(\Omega;\mathbb{R}^{d}) with L(X)=μ\mathcal{L}(X)=\mu, Γ∘X\Gamma\circ X is the class of Composition of a Square-Integrable Vector Field with a Random Vector, and the Lifted Score: Isometry, Norm, Weak Identity and Second-Moment Identity (i), and by that clause and Random Vectors: Coordinates, Functions, Pairs and Almost-Sure Equality (iii), ∥Γ∘X∥L22=∫∥Γ∥2dμ\lVert\Gamma\circ X\rVert_{L^{2}}^{2}=\int\lVert\Gamma\rVert^{2}d\mu. Finally, for V∈L2(Ω;Rd)V\in L^{2}(\Omega;\mathbb{R}^{d}) with a representative,

E[∥V∥]≤∥V∥L2,(H)\mathbb{E}[\lVert V\rVert]\le\lVert V\rVert_{L^{2}},\tag{H}

by Hölder's Inequality (i) with p=q=2p=q=2 (conjugate exponents in the sense of Conjugate Exponents and Young's Inequality (i), as 12+12=1\tfrac12+\tfrac12=1) applied to ∥V∥\lVert V\rVert and the constant 11: E[∥V∥]≤(E[∥V∥2])1/2=∥V∥L2\mathbb{E}[\lVert V\rVert]\le(\mathbb{E}[\lVert V\rVert^{2}])^{1/2}=\lVert V\rVert_{L^{2}} (The Space of Square-Integrable Random Vectors (iii)).

Iterated integrals (FB). Let p,r∈Np,r\in\mathbb{N} with 1≤p,r1\le p,r, α∈P(Rp)\alpha\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{p}), β∈P(Rr)\beta\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{r}), and let F:Rp+r→RF:\mathbb{R}^{p+r}\to\mathbb{R} be Borel with ∣F(ι(x,y))∣≤g(x)+h(y)|F(\iota(x,y))|\le g(x)+h(y) for all x,yx,y, where g:Rp→[0,∞)g:\mathbb{R}^{p}\to[0,\infty) and h:Rr→[0,∞)h:\mathbb{R}^{r}\to[0,\infty) are Borel and integrable with respect to α\alpha and β\beta. Then: for every xx the function y↦F(ι(x,y))y\mapsto F(\iota(x,y)) is Borel and β\beta-integrable; the function x↦∫F(ι(x,y))β(dy)x\mapsto\int F(\iota(x,y))\beta(dy) is Borel and α\alpha-integrable; symmetrically in the other order; FF is integrable with respect to α⊠β\alpha\boxtimes\beta; and

∫Rp+rF d(α⊠β)=∫(∫F(ι(x,y)) β(dy))α(dx)=∫(∫F(ι(x,y)) α(dx))β(dy).\int_{\mathbb{R}^{p+r}}F\,d(\alpha\boxtimes\beta)=\int\Bigl(\int F(\iota(x,y))\,\beta(dy)\Bigr)\alpha(dx)=\int\Bigl(\int F(\iota(x,y))\,\alpha(dx)\Bigr)\beta(dy).

Indeed, let F+=max⁡(F,0)F^{+}=\max(F,0) and F−=max⁡(−F,0)F^{-}=\max(-F,0), nonnegative Borel functions (claim 4 of Arithmetic of Measurable Real- and [0,∞]-Valued Maps) with F=F+−F−F=F^{+}-F^{-} and F±≤∣F∣F^{\pm}\le|F|. By Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets (iii), F±∘ιF^{\pm}\circ\iota is measurable for the product σ\sigma-algebra and ∫F±d(α⊠β)=∫F±∘ι d(α⊗β)\int F^{\pm}d(\alpha\boxtimes\beta)=\int F^{\pm}\circ\iota\,d(\alpha\otimes\beta); by Tonelli's and Fubini's Theorems (Sections and Tonelli), the sections of F±∘ιF^{\pm}\circ\iota are measurable, the functions x↦∫F±(ι(x,y))β(dy)x\mapsto\int F^{\pm}(\iota(x,y))\beta(dy) and y↦∫F±(ι(x,y))α(dx)y\mapsto\int F^{\pm}(\iota(x,y))\alpha(dx) are measurable, and the three integrals of F±F^{\pm} (product, and the two iterated orders) coincide in [0,∞][0,\infty]. By the domination and claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion, ∫F±(ι(x,y))β(dy)≤g(x)+∫h dβ<∞\int F^{\pm}(\iota(x,y))\beta(dy)\le g(x)+\int h\,d\beta<\infty for every xx, and the common value of the three integrals is at most ∫g dα+∫h dβ<∞\int g\,d\alpha+\int h\,d\beta<\infty. Hence every section is integrable, the functions x↦∫F(ι(x,y))β(dy)=∫F+(ι(x,y))β(dy)−∫F−(ι(x,y))β(dy)x\mapsto\int F(\iota(x,y))\beta(dy)=\int F^{+}(\iota(x,y))\beta(dy)-\int F^{-}(\iota(x,y))\beta(dy) are real-valued, measurable (claim 2 of Arithmetic of Measurable Real- and [0,∞]-Valued Maps) and integrable, FF is α⊠β\alpha\boxtimes\beta-integrable (Integrable Functions and Their Lebesgue Integral), and the displayed identities follow by subtracting the identities for F−F^{-} from those for F+F^{+}, using claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion and the definition of the integral of an integrable function as the difference of the integrals of its positive and negative parts. A bounded Borel FF with ∣F∣≤C|F|\le C satisfies the hypothesis with g=Cg=C, h=0h=0.

Proof of claim 1. Let ff be as in claim 1 and UU the lift of ufu_{f}. Apply The Lift of a Linear Functional of the Measure: Integrability, L-Gradient, Lipschitz Gradient Map and Translation Laplacian with M1=M2=MM_{1}=M_{2}=M.

(a) ufu_{f} is continuously LL-differentiable by The Lift of a Linear Functional of the Measure: Integrability, L-Gradient, Lipschitz Gradient Map and Translation Laplacian (iii), i.e. U∈C1(L2(Ω;Rd))U\in C^{1}(L^{2}(\Omega;\mathbb{R}^{d})) (L-Differentiability of a Function on the Wasserstein Space via the Fréchet Derivative of Its Lift (ii)).

(b) By The Lift of a Linear Functional of the Measure: Integrability, L-Gradient, Lipschitz Gradient Map and Translation Laplacian (ii), DU(X)=Df∘XDU(X)=Df\circ X for every XX, the class of the composition of DfDf with a representative of XX, which is the class Df∘XDf\circ X of Composition of a Square-Integrable Vector Field with a Random Vector, and the Lifted Score: Isometry, Norm, Weak Identity and Second-Moment Identity (i) for the class Df∈L2(L(X);Rd)Df\in L^{2}(\mathcal{L}(X);\mathbb{R}^{d}). For μ∈P2(Rd)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) the class DfDf lies in TμT_{\mu} by Gradients of Functions with Bounded Derivatives Belong to the Tangent Space; Constants Are Tangent; the Score Identity; the Score Has Mean Zero; Translation of Tangent Fields (i), so property (b) holds with η=Df\eta=Df, and ∇uf(μ)\nabla u_{f}(\mu) is the class of x↦Df(x)x\mapsto Df(x) (Test Functions on the Wasserstein Space: the Intrinsic Gradient and the Translation Hessian (ii)).

(c) UU is twice continuously differentiable along translations by The Lift of a Linear Functional of the Measure: Integrability, L-Gradient, Lipschitz Gradient Map and Translation Laplacian (iv).

(d) and the Lipschitz constant. Let X,Y∈L2(Ω;Rd)X,Y\in L^{2}(\Omega;\mathbb{R}^{d}) with representatives. By The Lift of a Linear Functional of the Measure: Integrability, L-Gradient, Lipschitz Gradient Map and Translation Laplacian (i), U(X)−U(Y)=E[f∘X]−E[f∘Y]=E[f∘X−f∘Y]U(X)-U(Y)=\mathbb{E}[f\circ X]-\mathbb{E}[f\circ Y]=\mathbb{E}[f\circ X-f\circ Y], and by (Lip), ∣f(X(ω))−f(Y(ω))∣≤d M∥X(ω)−Y(ω)∥|f(X(\omega))-f(Y(\omega))|\le\sqrt{d}\,M\lVert X(\omega)-Y(\omega)\rVert for every ω\omega, so claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion and (H) give ∣U(X)−U(Y)∣≤d M E[∥X−Y∥]≤d M∥X−Y∥L2|U(X)-U(Y)|\le\sqrt{d}\,M\,\mathbb{E}[\lVert X-Y\rVert]\le\sqrt{d}\,M\lVert X-Y\rVert_{L^{2}}. Thus UU is Lipschitz with constant d M\sqrt{d}\,M (Lipschitz Map Between Metric Spaces, with the distance dL2d_{L^{2}} of The Wasserstein Space and Its Lift to Square-Integrable Random Vectors: Standing Notation (iii)), so ufu_{f} is Lipschitz with constant d M\sqrt{d}\,M by Basic Properties of the Lift: Law Invariance, the Correspondence on a Rich Space, and Transfer of Boundedness, Lipschitz Constants and Continuity (vi), the space being rich, and continuous by A Lipschitz Map is Uniformly Continuous and Continuous. Hence ufu_{f} is a test function.

The translation Hessian. Let μ∈P2(Rd)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}), XX with L(X)=μ\mathcal{L}(X)=\mu (The Wasserstein Distance and the Mean-Square Distance of Random Vectors (iii)), and ϕX(a)=U(X+ca)\phi_{X}(a)=U(X+c_{a}). By The Wasserstein Space and Its Lift to Square-Integrable Random Vectors: Standing Notation (vi), The Lift of a Linear Functional of the Measure: Integrability, L-Gradient, Lipschitz Gradient Map and Translation Laplacian (i), Random Vectors: Coordinates, Functions, Pairs and Almost-Sure Equality (iii) and change of variables, ϕX(a)=∫f d(τa)#μ=∫f(x+a) μ(dx)\phi_{X}(a)=\int f\,d(\tau_{a})_{\#}\mu=\int f(x+a)\,\mu(dx). Fix aa and i∈[d]i\in[d]. For t∈(−1,1)t\in(-1,1) and x∈Rdx\in\mathbb{R}^{d} put F(t,x)=f(x+a+tei)F(t,x)=f(x+a+te_{i}). Each x↦F(t,x)x\mapsto F(t,x) is integrable (The Lift of a Linear Functional of the Measure: Integrability, L-Gradient, Lipschitz Gradient Map and Translation Laplacian (i) for (τa+tei)#μ∈P2(Rd)(\tau_{a+te_{i}})_{\#}\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}), Gradients of Functions with Bounded Derivatives Belong to the Tangent Space; Constants Are Tangent; the Score Identity; the Score Has Mean Zero; Translation of Tangent Fields (v), and change of variables); for each xx, t↦F(t,x)t\mapsto F(t,x) is differentiable at every tt with derivative ∂if(x+a+tei)\partial_{i}f(x+a+te_{i}) by Chain Rule Along an Affine Path and Continuous Partial Derivatives Imply Differentiability; and ∣∂if∣≤M|\partial_{i}f|\le M, a constant integrable against μ\mu. By Differentiation under the Integral Sign, t↦ϕX(a+tei)t\mapsto\phi_{X}(a+te_{i}) is differentiable at 00 with derivative ∫∂if(x+a)μ(dx)\int\partial_{i}f(x+a)\mu(dx); its difference quotients at 00 are those of Partial Derivative of a Real-Valued Function on an Open Subset of Rn\mathbb{R}^n for ϕX\phi_{X} at aa, so ∂iϕX(a)=∫∂if(x+a) μ(dx)\partial_{i}\phi_{X}(a)=\int\partial_{i}f(x+a)\,\mu(dx). Let μˇ=(−id)#μ\check{\mu}=(-\mathrm{id})_{\#}\mu, the push-forward under the map x↦−xx\mapsto-x, which is Borel by the componentwise criterion and claim 2 of Arithmetic of Measurable Real- and [0,∞]-Valued Maps; change of variables gives ∂iϕX(a)=∫∂if(a−y) μˇ(dy)=((∂if)∗μˇ)(a)\partial_{i}\phi_{X}(a)=\int\partial_{i}f(a-y)\,\check{\mu}(dy)=((\partial_{i}f)*\check{\mu})(a) in the notation of The Convolution of a Bounded Continuous Function with a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space: Continuity, Boundedness and Differentiation Under the Integral. Since ∂if\partial_{i}f is of class C1C^{1} with ∣∂if∣≤M|\partial_{i}f|\le M and ∣∂j∂if∣≤M|\partial_{j}\partial_{i}f|\le M, The Convolution of a Bounded Continuous Function with a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space: Continuity, Boundedness and Differentiation Under the Integral (ii) shows that ∂iϕX\partial_{i}\phi_{X} is of class C1C^{1} on Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} with ∂j∂iϕX(a)=((∂j∂if)∗μˇ)(a)=∫∂j∂if(x+a) μ(dx)\partial_{j}\partial_{i}\phi_{X}(a)=((\partial_{j}\partial_{i}f)*\check{\mu})(a)=\int\partial_{j}\partial_{i}f(x+a)\,\mu(dx) (change of variables back). Also ϕX\phi_{X} is continuous, since ∣ϕX(a)−ϕX(a′)∣≤∫∣f(x+a)−f(x+a′)∣μ(dx)≤d M∥a−a′∥|\phi_{X}(a)-\phi_{X}(a')|\le\int|f(x+a)-f(x+a')|\mu(dx)\le\sqrt{d}\,M\lVert a-a'\rVert by (Lip) and claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion, so ϕX\phi_{X} is of class C2C^{2} (Functions of Class Cᵏ on an Open Subset of ℝⁿ), and by The Hessian Matrix of a Function of Class C² and Test Functions on the Wasserstein Space: the Intrinsic Gradient and the Translation Hessian (iii), Huf(μ)=D2ϕX(0Rd)H_{u_{f}}(\mu)=D^{2}\phi_{X}(0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}) has entry ∂i∂jϕX(0Rd)=∫∂i∂jf dμ\partial_{i}\partial_{j}\phi_{X}(0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}})=\int\partial_{i}\partial_{j}f\,d\mu in row ii and column jj; since this matrix belongs to S(d)\mathcal{S}(d) by Test Functions on the Wasserstein Space: the Intrinsic Gradient and the Translation Hessian (iii), its entry in row ii and column jj equals its entry in row jj and column ii, namely ∫∂j∂if dμ\int\partial_{j}\partial_{i}f\,d\mu, as stated; each ∂j∂if\partial_{j}\partial_{i}f is bounded and Borel as noted.

Proof of claim 2. Let KK be as in claim 2.

Oddness of DKDK. Let x∈Rdx\in\mathbb{R}^{d}, i∈[d]i\in[d]. For h≠0h\ne0, evenness gives (K(x+hei)−K(x))/h=(K(−x+(−h)ei)−K(−x))/h=−(K(−x+(−h)ei)−K(−x))/(−h)\bigl(K(x+he_{i})-K(x)\bigr)/h=\bigl(K(-x+(-h)e_{i})-K(-x)\bigr)/h=-\bigl(K(-x+(-h)e_{i})-K(-x)\bigr)/(-h). Given ε>0\varepsilon>0, let δ\delta and δ′\delta' be the radii of Partial Derivative of a Real-Valued Function on an Open Subset of Rn\mathbb{R}^n for KK at −x-x and at xx with ε/2\varepsilon/2 in place of ε\varepsilon (claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field), and let hh satisfy 0<∣h∣<min⁡(δ,δ′)0<|h|<\min(\delta,\delta') (claim 9 there; then 0<∣−h∣<δ0<|-h|<\delta by claim 2 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field). The left side lies within ε/2\varepsilon/2 of ∂iK(x)\partial_{i}K(x) and the right side within ε/2\varepsilon/2 of −∂iK(−x)-\partial_{i}K(-x), so ∣∂iK(x)+∂iK(−x)∣<ε|\partial_{i}K(x)+\partial_{i}K(-x)|<\varepsilon by claim 5 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field; as ε>0\varepsilon>0 was arbitrary, ∂iK(x)=−∂iK(−x)\partial_{i}K(x)=-\partial_{i}K(-x) by Comparison of Real Numbers with Arbitrary Positive Slack (iii).

Borel functions and the potential. KK, ∂iK\partial_{i}K and ∂j∂iK\partial_{j}\partial_{i}K are continuous, hence Borel. The map z↦pr1(z)−pr2(z)z\mapsto\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z)-\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z) on Rd+d\mathbb{R}^{d+d} is Borel (its components are differences of the Borel components of the projections, Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets (i), claim 2 of Arithmetic of Measurable Real- and [0,∞]-Valued Maps), so z↦K(pr1(z)−pr2(z))z\mapsto K(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z)-\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z)) is Borel, and bounded by MM; likewise y↦K(x−y)y\mapsto K(x-y) for fixed xx. Let μ∈P2(Rd)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}). In the notation of The Convolution of a Bounded Continuous Function with a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space: Continuity, Boundedness and Differentiation Under the Integral (dimension q=dq=d), K∗μK*\mu is the function (H∗μ)(H*\mu) of that lemma with H=KH=K. By The Convolution of a Bounded Continuous Function with a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space: Continuity, Boundedness and Differentiation Under the Integral (ii) with G=KG=K (of class C1C^{1}, ∣K∣≤M|K|\le M, ∣∂iK∣≤M|\partial_{i}K|\le M), K∗μK*\mu is of class C1C^{1} with ∂i(K∗μ)=(∂iK)∗μ\partial_{i}(K*\mu)=(\partial_{i}K)*\mu; by the same clause with G=∂iKG=\partial_{i}K (of class C1C^{1} since KK is of class C2C^{2}, clause 2 of Functions of Class Cᵏ on an Open Subset of ℝⁿ, with ∣∂iK∣≤M|\partial_{i}K|\le M, ∣∂j∂iK∣≤M|\partial_{j}\partial_{i}K|\le M), (∂iK)∗μ(\partial_{i}K)*\mu is of class C1C^{1} with ∂j((∂iK)∗μ)=(∂j∂iK)∗μ\partial_{j}((\partial_{i}K)*\mu)=(\partial_{j}\partial_{i}K)*\mu. Hence K∗μK*\mu is of class C2C^{2} on Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} with the displayed formulas for ∂i(K∗μ)\partial_{i}(K*\mu) and ∂j∂i(K∗μ)\partial_{j}\partial_{i}(K*\mu), and the three bounds by MM follow from The Convolution of a Bounded Continuous Function with a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space: Continuity, Boundedness and Differentiation Under the Integral (i). Write Γμ=D(K∗μ)\Gamma_{\mu}=D(K*\mu), a Borel map with ∣(Γμ)i∣≤M|(\Gamma_{\mu})_{i}|\le M, and Γμ(x)=∫DK(x−y)μ(dy)\Gamma_{\mu}(x)=\int DK(x-y)\mu(dy) coordinatewise.

The two expressions for KK\mathcal{K}_{K}. By (FB) with p=r=dp=r=d, α=β=μ\alpha=\beta=\mu and the bounded Borel F(z)=K(pr1(z)−pr2(z))F(z)=K(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z)-\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z)), for which F(ι(x,y))=K(x−y)F(\iota(x,y))=K(x-y) (Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets (i)),

∫Rd+dF d(μ⊠μ)=∫(∫K(x−y) μ(dy))μ(dx)=∫K∗μ dμ,\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d+d}}F\,d(\mu\boxtimes\mu)=\int\Bigl(\int K(x-y)\,\mu(dy)\Bigr)\mu(dx)=\int K*\mu\,d\mu ,

which is the identity in the statement. More generally, for α,β∈P(Rd)\alpha,\beta\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) write K(α,β)=∫(∫K(x−y)β(dy))α(dx)\mathcal{K}(\alpha,\beta)=\int(\int K(x-y)\beta(dy))\alpha(dx); by (FB) it also equals ∫(∫K(x−y)α(dx))β(dy)\int(\int K(x-y)\alpha(dx))\beta(dy), and KK(μ)=K(μ,μ)\mathcal{K}_{K}(\mu)=\mathcal{K}(\mu,\mu).

Translation invariance. Let a∈Rda\in\mathbb{R}^{d} and μa=(τa)#μ\mu_{a}=(\tau_{a})_{\#}\mu, an element of P2(Rd)\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) by Gradients of Functions with Bounded Derivatives Belong to the Tangent Space; Constants Are Tangent; the Score Identity; the Score Has Mean Zero; Translation of Tangent Fields (v). For every xx, change of variables gives (K∗μa)(x)=∫K(x−y−a)μ(dy)=(K∗μ)(x−a)(K*\mu_{a})(x)=\int K(x-y-a)\mu(dy)=(K*\mu)(x-a), and then KK(μa)=∫(K∗μ)(x−a) μa(dx)=∫(K∗μ)(x+a−a) μ(dx)=KK(μ)\mathcal{K}_{K}(\mu_{a})=\int(K*\mu)(x-a)\,\mu_{a}(dx)=\int(K*\mu)(x+a-a)\,\mu(dx)=\mathcal{K}_{K}(\mu), the function K∗μK*\mu being bounded and continuous, hence Borel and integrable.

Reduction to the law of a pair. Let X,H∈L2(Ω;Rd)X,H\in L^{2}(\Omega;\mathbb{R}^{d}) with representatives, μ=L(X)\mu=\mathcal{L}(X), and let π=L((X,H))∈P(Rd+d)\pi=\mathcal{L}((X,H))\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{d+d}), the law of the pairing, a coupling of μ\mu and L(H)\mathcal{L}(H) by Random Vectors: Coordinates, Functions, Pairs and Almost-Sure Equality (v), so that (pr1)#π=μ(\mathrm{pr}_{1})_{\#}\pi=\mu. Let θ:Rd+d→Rd\theta:\mathbb{R}^{d+d}\to\mathbb{R}^{d}, θ(z)=pr1(z)+pr2(z)\theta(z)=\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z)+\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z), a Borel map; since X+H=θ∘(X,H)X+H=\theta\circ(X,H) pointwise, Random Vectors: Coordinates, Functions, Pairs and Almost-Sure Equality (ii) gives L(X+H)=θ#π\mathcal{L}(X+H)=\theta_{\#}\pi. For a bounded Borel G:Rd→RG:\mathbb{R}^{d}\to\mathbb{R} and Borel S:Rd+d→RdS:\mathbb{R}^{d+d}\to\mathbb{R}^{d}, change of variables gives ∫G d(S#π)=∫G∘S dπ\int G\,d(S_{\#}\pi)=\int G\circ S\,d\pi. Applying this twice (inside, for fixed xx, to y↦K(x−y)y\mapsto K(x-y), then outside, to the bounded Borel function x↦∫K(x−S(z′))π(dz′)x\mapsto\int K(x-S(z'))\pi(dz'), Borel by (FB) for the bounded Borel function (x,z′)↦K(x−S(z′))(x,z')\mapsto K(x-S(z')) on Rd+(d+d)\mathbb{R}^{d+(d+d)}),

KK(S#π)=∫(∫K(S(z)−S(z′)) π(dz′))π(dz)for S∈{pr1,θ}.(R)\mathcal{K}_{K}(S_{\#}\pi)=\int\Bigl(\int K\bigl(S(z)-S(z')\bigr)\,\pi(dz')\Bigr)\pi(dz)\qquad\text{for }S\in\{\mathrm{pr}_{1},\theta\}.\tag{R}

Thus, with Φ\Phi the lift of KK\mathcal{K}_{K}, Φ(X)=KK(μ)\Phi(X)=\mathcal{K}_{K}(\mu) is (R) with S=pr1S=\mathrm{pr}_{1} and Φ(X+H)=KK(θ#π)\Phi(X+H)=\mathcal{K}_{K}(\theta_{\#}\pi) is (R) with S=θS=\theta.

(a): differentiability. Keep X,H,πX,H,\pi as above and write, for z,z′∈Rd+dz,z'\in\mathbb{R}^{d+d}, u=pr1(z)−pr1(z′)u=\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z)-\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z') and w=pr2(z)−pr2(z′)w=\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z)-\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z'), so θ(z)−θ(z′)=u+w\theta(z)-\theta(z')=u+w. Consider the Borel functions on R(d+d)+(d+d)\mathbb{R}^{(d+d)+(d+d)} given at ι(z,z′)\iota(z,z') by F1=K(u+w)F_{1}=K(u+w), F2=K(u)F_{2}=K(u) and F3=DK(u)⋅wF_{3}=DK(u)\cdot w (Borel by the preamble and claims 2 and 3 of Arithmetic of Measurable Real- and [0,∞]-Valued Maps). F1,F2F_{1},F_{2} are bounded by MM, and ∣F3∣≤d M∥w∥≤d M(∥pr2(z)∥+∥pr2(z′)∥)|F_{3}|\le\sqrt{d}\,M\lVert w\rVert\le\sqrt{d}\,M(\lVert\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z)\rVert+\lVert\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z')\rVert) (claims 5 and 6 of Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square), where z↦∥pr2(z)∥z\mapsto\lVert\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z)\rVert is Borel and π\pi-integrable with ∫∥pr2(z)∥π(dz)=E[∥H∥]≤∥H∥L2\int\lVert\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z)\rVert\pi(dz)=\mathbb{E}[\lVert H\rVert]\le\lVert H\rVert_{L^{2}} (change of variables, (H)); so (FB) applies to F1,F2,F3F_{1},F_{2},F_{3} and to F1−F2−F3F_{1}-F_{2}-F_{3} with α=β=π\alpha=\beta=\pi. By (Tay), ∣F1−F2−F3∣≤12dM∥w∥2≤dM(∥pr2(z)∥2+∥pr2(z′)∥2)|F_{1}-F_{2}-F_{3}|\le\tfrac12dM\lVert w\rVert^{2}\le dM(\lVert\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z)\rVert^{2}+\lVert\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z')\rVert^{2}), and ∫∥pr2(z)∥2π(dz)=E[∥H∥2]=∥H∥L22\int\lVert\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z)\rVert^{2}\pi(dz)=\mathbb{E}[\lVert H\rVert^{2}]=\lVert H\rVert_{L^{2}}^{2}; hence, by (FB), claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion and Tonelli for the dominating function,

∣∫(F1−F2−F3) d(π⊠π)∣≤2dM∥H∥L22.\Bigl|\int(F_{1}-F_{2}-F_{3})\,d(\pi\boxtimes\pi)\Bigr|\le2dM\lVert H\rVert_{L^{2}}^{2}.

By (R) and (FB), ∫F1d(π⊠π)=Φ(X+H)\int F_{1}d(\pi\boxtimes\pi)=\Phi(X+H) and ∫F2 d(π⊠π)=Φ(X)\int F_{2}\,d(\pi\boxtimes\pi)=\Phi(X). For F3F_{3}, write F3=F3′−F3′′F_{3}=F_{3}'-F_{3}'' with F3′=DK(u)⋅pr2(z)F_{3}'=DK(u)\cdot\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z) and F3′′=DK(u)⋅pr2(z′)F_{3}''=DK(u)\cdot\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z'), both dominated as F3F_{3} is. Integrating F3′F_{3}' first in z′z': for fixed zz, ∫DK(pr1(z)−pr1(z′))⋅pr2(z) π(dz′)=(∫DK(pr1(z)−y) μ(dy))⋅pr2(z)=Γμ(pr1(z))⋅pr2(z)\int DK(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z)-\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z'))\cdot\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z)\,\pi(dz')=\Bigl(\int DK(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z)-y)\,\mu(dy)\Bigr)\cdot\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z)=\Gamma_{\mu}(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z))\cdot\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z) (coordinatewise, claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion and change of variables with (pr1)#π=μ(\mathrm{pr}_{1})_{\#}\pi=\mu), and then ∫Γμ(pr1(z))⋅pr2(z) π(dz)=E[Γμ(X)⋅H]=⟨Γμ∘X,H⟩L2\int\Gamma_{\mu}(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z))\cdot\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z)\,\pi(dz)=\mathbb{E}[\Gamma_{\mu}(X)\cdot H]=\langle\Gamma_{\mu}\circ X,H\rangle_{L^{2}} (Random Vectors: Coordinates, Functions, Pairs and Almost-Sure Equality (iii) for the pairing (X,H)(X,H), The Space of Square-Integrable Random Vectors (iii)). Integrating F3′′F_{3}'' first in zz (the other order in (FB)): for fixed z′z', ∫DK(pr1(z)−pr1(z′)) π(dz)=∫DK(x−pr1(z′)) μ(dx)=−∫DK(pr1(z′)−x) μ(dx)=−Γμ(pr1(z′))\int DK(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z)-\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z'))\,\pi(dz)=\int DK(x-\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z'))\,\mu(dx)=-\int DK(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z')-x)\,\mu(dx)=-\Gamma_{\mu}(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z')) by the oddness of DKDK, so ∫F3′′ d(π⊠π)=−∫Γμ(pr1(z′))⋅pr2(z′) π(dz′)=−⟨Γμ∘X,H⟩L2\int F_{3}''\,d(\pi\boxtimes\pi)=-\int\Gamma_{\mu}(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z'))\cdot\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z')\,\pi(dz')=-\langle\Gamma_{\mu}\circ X,H\rangle_{L^{2}}. Therefore ∫F3 d(π⊠π)=2⟨Γμ∘X,H⟩L2=⟨2Γμ∘X,H⟩L2\int F_{3}\,d(\pi\boxtimes\pi)=2\langle\Gamma_{\mu}\circ X,H\rangle_{L^{2}}=\langle2\Gamma_{\mu}\circ X,H\rangle_{L^{2}}, and altogether

∣Φ(X+H)−Φ(X)−⟨2 Γμ∘X,H⟩L2∣≤2dM∥H∥L22(H∈L2(Ω;Rd)).\bigl|\Phi(X+H)-\Phi(X)-\langle2\,\Gamma_{\mu}\circ X,H\rangle_{L^{2}}\bigr|\le2dM\lVert H\rVert_{L^{2}}^{2}\qquad(H\in L^{2}(\Omega;\mathbb{R}^{d})).

Given ε>0\varepsilon>0, put δ=ε/(2dM+1)\delta=\varepsilon/(2dM+1); for ∥H∥L2<δ\lVert H\rVert_{L^{2}}<\delta the right side is at most ε∥H∥L2\varepsilon\lVert H\rVert_{L^{2}} (claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field). Hence Φ\Phi is differentiable at XX with gradient DΦ(X)=2 Γμ∘XD\Phi(X)=2\,\Gamma_{\mu}\circ X (Fréchet Differentiability and the Gradient on an Open Subset of a Real Inner Product Space (i), Fréchet Differentiability and the Gradient on an Open Subset of a Real Inner Product Space (ii)), for every XX with L(X)=μ\mathcal{L}(X)=\mu.

(a): continuity of the gradient map. Let X,Y∈L2(Ω;Rd)X,Y\in L^{2}(\Omega;\mathbb{R}^{d}) with laws μ,ν\mu,\nu. By The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity (i) and the linearity of composition (Composition of a Square-Integrable Vector Field with a Random Vector, and the Lifted Score: Isometry, Norm, Weak Identity and Second-Moment Identity (i)), ∥DΦ(X)−DΦ(Y)∥L2≤2∥Γμ∘X−Γμ∘Y∥L2+2∥(Γμ−Γν)∘Y∥L2\lVert D\Phi(X)-D\Phi(Y)\rVert_{L^{2}}\le2\lVert\Gamma_{\mu}\circ X-\Gamma_{\mu}\circ Y\rVert_{L^{2}}+2\lVert(\Gamma_{\mu}-\Gamma_{\nu})\circ Y\rVert_{L^{2}}. Each ∂i(K∗μ)\partial_{i}(K*\mu) is of class C1C^{1} with partials bounded by MM, so (Lip) gives ∣(Γμ)i(x)−(Γμ)i(y)∣≤d M∥x−y∥|(\Gamma_{\mu})_{i}(x)-(\Gamma_{\mu})_{i}(y)|\le\sqrt{d}\,M\lVert x-y\rVert and hence ∥Γμ(x)−Γμ(y)∥≤dM∥x−y∥\lVert\Gamma_{\mu}(x)-\Gamma_{\mu}(y)\rVert\le dM\lVert x-y\rVert; thus ∥Γμ∘X−Γμ∘Y∥L22=E[∥Γμ(X)−Γμ(Y)∥2]≤d2M2∥X−Y∥L22\lVert\Gamma_{\mu}\circ X-\Gamma_{\mu}\circ Y\rVert_{L^{2}}^{2}=\mathbb{E}[\lVert\Gamma_{\mu}(X)-\Gamma_{\mu}(Y)\rVert^{2}]\le d^{2}M^{2}\lVert X-Y\rVert_{L^{2}}^{2}. For every y∈Rdy\in\mathbb{R}^{d} and ii, change of variables and Random Vectors: Coordinates, Functions, Pairs and Almost-Sure Equality (iii) give (Γμ)i(y)−(Γν)i(y)=E[∂iK(y−X)−∂iK(y−Y)](\Gamma_{\mu})_{i}(y)-(\Gamma_{\nu})_{i}(y)=\mathbb{E}[\partial_{i}K(y-X)-\partial_{i}K(y-Y)], whose absolute value is at most d M E[∥X−Y∥]≤d M∥X−Y∥L2\sqrt{d}\,M\,\mathbb{E}[\lVert X-Y\rVert]\le\sqrt{d}\,M\lVert X-Y\rVert_{L^{2}} by (Lip) for ∂iK\partial_{i}K, claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion and (H); so ∥Γμ(y)−Γν(y)∥≤dM∥X−Y∥L2\lVert\Gamma_{\mu}(y)-\Gamma_{\nu}(y)\rVert\le dM\lVert X-Y\rVert_{L^{2}} for every yy, and ∥(Γμ−Γν)∘Y∥L2≤dM∥X−Y∥L2\lVert(\Gamma_{\mu}-\Gamma_{\nu})\circ Y\rVert_{L^{2}}\le dM\lVert X-Y\rVert_{L^{2}}. Altogether ∥DΦ(X)−DΦ(Y)∥L2≤4dM∥X−Y∥L2\lVert D\Phi(X)-D\Phi(Y)\rVert_{L^{2}}\le4dM\lVert X-Y\rVert_{L^{2}}, so the gradient map is Lipschitz, hence continuous (A Lipschitz Map is Uniformly Continuous and Continuous), and Φ∈C1(L2(Ω;Rd))\Phi\in C^{1}(L^{2}(\Omega;\mathbb{R}^{d})).

(b). For μ∈P2(Rd)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) the class of 2Γμ=2D(K∗μ)2\Gamma_{\mu}=2D(K*\mu) lies in TμT_{\mu}: K∗μK*\mu is of class C1C^{1} with ∣∂i(K∗μ)∣≤M|\partial_{i}(K*\mu)|\le M, so D(K∗μ)∈TμD(K*\mu)\in T_{\mu} by Gradients of Functions with Bounded Derivatives Belong to the Tangent Space; Constants Are Tangent; the Score Identity; the Score Has Mean Zero; Translation of Tangent Fields (i), and TμT_{\mu} is a linear subspace (Basic Properties of the Tangent Space: Closed Subspace, the Identity Map Belongs to It, Second-Moment Limits, and Representation of Bounded Functionals on Gradients (i)). By the differentiability paragraph, DΦ(X)=(2Γμ)∘XD\Phi(X)=(2\Gamma_{\mu})\circ X for every XX with L(X)=μ\mathcal{L}(X)=\mu (linearity of composition, Composition of a Square-Integrable Vector Field with a Random Vector, and the Lifted Score: Isometry, Norm, Weak Identity and Second-Moment Identity (i)). So (b) holds, and ∇KK(μ)\nabla\mathcal{K}_{K}(\mu) is the class of x↦2D(K∗μ)(x)x\mapsto2D(K*\mu)(x) (Test Functions on the Wasserstein Space: the Intrinsic Gradient and the Translation Hessian (ii)).

(c) and the translation Hessian. For XX with law μ\mu, ϕX(a)=Φ(X+ca)=KK((τa)#μ)=KK(μ)\phi_{X}(a)=\Phi(X+c_{a})=\mathcal{K}_{K}((\tau_{a})_{\#}\mu)=\mathcal{K}_{K}(\mu) by The Wasserstein Space and Its Lift to Square-Integrable Random Vectors: Standing Notation (vi) and translation invariance; a constant function is smooth (claim 2 of Constants, Affine Functions, Sums, Products and Quotients of Cᵏ Functions) and its partial derivatives, and theirs, vanish identically (the difference quotients of Partial Derivative of a Real-Valued Function on an Open Subset of Rn\mathbb{R}^n are 00). Hence Φ\Phi is twice continuously differentiable along translations at every XX, and HKK(μ)=D2ϕX(0Rd)=0dH_{\mathcal{K}_{K}}(\mu)=D^{2}\phi_{X}(0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}})=0_{d} (The Hessian Matrix of a Function of Class C², Test Functions on the Wasserstein Space: the Intrinsic Gradient and the Translation Hessian (iii)).

(d) and the Lipschitz constant. Let X,Y∈L2(Ω;Rd)X,Y\in L^{2}(\Omega;\mathbb{R}^{d}) with laws μ,ν\mu,\nu and let π=L((X,Y))\pi=\mathcal{L}((X,Y)), a coupling of μ\mu and ν\nu (Random Vectors: Coordinates, Functions, Pairs and Almost-Sure Equality (v)). By (R) with S=pr1S=\mathrm{pr}_{1} and with S=pr2S=\mathrm{pr}_{2} (the same argument, (pr2)#π=ν(\mathrm{pr}_{2})_{\#}\pi=\nu), and (FB),

Φ(X)−Φ(Y)=∫(∫[K(pr1(z)−pr1(z′))−K(pr2(z)−pr2(z′))]π(dz′))π(dz).\Phi(X)-\Phi(Y)=\int\Bigl(\int\bigl[K(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z)-\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z'))-K(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z)-\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z'))\bigr]\pi(dz')\Bigr)\pi(dz).

By (Lip) and claims 5 and 6 of Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square, the integrand is bounded in absolute value by d M(∥pr1(z)−pr2(z)∥+∥pr1(z′)−pr2(z′)∥)\sqrt{d}\,M\bigl(\lVert\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z)-\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z)\rVert+\lVert\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z')-\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z')\rVert\bigr), and ∫∥pr1(z)−pr2(z)∥π(dz)=E[∥X−Y∥]≤∥X−Y∥L2\int\lVert\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z)-\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z)\rVert\pi(dz)=\mathbb{E}[\lVert X-Y\rVert]\le\lVert X-Y\rVert_{L^{2}} (change of variables, (H)). Integrating twice with claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion, ∣Φ(X)−Φ(Y)∣≤2d M∥X−Y∥L2|\Phi(X)-\Phi(Y)|\le2\sqrt{d}\,M\lVert X-Y\rVert_{L^{2}}. Thus Φ\Phi is Lipschitz with constant 2d M2\sqrt{d}\,M, so KK\mathcal{K}_{K} is Lipschitz with constant 2d M2\sqrt{d}\,M by Basic Properties of the Lift: Law Invariance, the Correspondence on a Rich Space, and Transfer of Boundedness, Lipschitz Constants and Continuity (vi) and continuous by A Lipschitz Map is Uniformly Continuous and Continuous. Hence KK\mathcal{K}_{K} is a test function with the stated gradient and translation Hessian.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…