TheoremBase

Gaussian integration by parts applied to a test function times the Gibbs weight (derivatives bounded via the slope bound and the lower bound on V) gives integration by parts against the Gibbs measure, so the Gibbs measure has zero score in the Gibbs entropy pair. The pair is (beta/kappa - K)-displacement convex, and the HWI theorem yields the entropy-form log-Sobolev and Talagrand inequalities. Gross's form follows from the entropy form for the measure with density proportional to F2F^2 + eps, letting eps tend to 0.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. Elementary real arithmetic and order (The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background §background) are used without citation; this covers manipulations of inequalities, finite sums and products, the limit laws for convergent real sequences, the preservation of non-strict inequalities under limits, and the fact that r≤sr\le s when r,sr,s are nonnegative with r2≤s2r^{2}\le s^{2}. Integrals and integrability are those of Measure Spaces and the Lebesgue Integral: Standing Notation; linearity and monotonicity of the integral are Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable and Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative; a bounded Borel function is integrable with respect to a Borel probability measure on XX by claim 6(b) of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space. Test functions in FCb1(X)\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X) are written φ\varphi, uu; the letter ϕ\phi is reserved for the function of The Function slog⁡ss\log s: Continuity, Young's Inequality and Lower Bounds, with the Elementary Bounds for the Exponential and the Logarithm.

Notation. Write γV=γβV\gamma^{V}=\gamma^{V}_{\beta} and w=wV,βw=w_{V,\beta} for the weight of The Gibbs Measure of an Admissible Cylindrical Potential Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure §weight, and keep the full notation ZV,βZ_{V,\beta} for the normaliser of The Gibbs Measure of an Admissible Cylindrical Potential Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure §normaliser; ZV,βZ_{V,\beta} is positive and γV∈P(X)\gamma^{V}\in\mathcal{P}(X) by The Gibbs Measure of an Admissible Cylindrical Potential Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure §gibbs. Let V=v∘pdV=v\circ p_{d} with head dimension dd and profile vv (Admissible Cylindrical Potentials on a Hilbert Space in the Noise Geometry §admissible), and fix constants bb and CC as in Admissible Cylindrical Potentials on a Hilbert Space in the Noise Geometry §below and Admissible Cylindrical Potentials on a Hilbert Space in the Noise Geometry §slope; C≥0C\ge0 by Basic Properties of an Admissible Cylindrical Potential: Continuity, Growth under Noise Translations, Integrability, the Tangent Inequality and Tangency of the Noise Gradient §translation, and −b≤V(x)-b\le V(x) for every xx, VV and every ∂kV\partial_{k}V being continuous, hence Borel, by Basic Properties of an Admissible Cylindrical Potential: Continuity, Growth under Noise Translations, Integrability, the Tangent Inequality and Tangency of the Noise Gradient §continuity. Let Θ:R→R\Theta:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}, Θ(s)=exp⁡(−s/β)\Theta(s)=\exp(-s/\beta), so that w=Θ∘Vw=\Theta\circ V. Put

λ=βκ−K=β−κKκ,\lambda=\frac{\beta}{\kappa}-K=\frac{\beta-\kappa K}{\kappa},

which is positive since κK<β\kappa K<\beta and κ>0\kappa>0.

Step 1 (Calculus of profiles). For N∈NN\in\mathbb{N} the set RN\mathbb{R}^{N} is open by claim 1 of Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and CkC^k Maps are Continuous, and the class C1C^{1} and the partial derivatives on it are those of Differential Calculus and Convexity on Euclidean Open Sets: Standing Notation §derivatives, that is, of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set, which are the notions of Constants, Coordinate Functions, Sums and Products of CkC^k Functions on a Euclidean Open Set and A Composition of CkC^k Maps Between Euclidean Open Sets is of Class CkC^k. Points of RN\mathbb{R}^{N} are written y,y′y,y'.

(a) Sums and products. Let f,g:RN→Rf,g:\mathbb{R}^{N}\to\mathbb{R} be of class C1C^{1} on RN\mathbb{R}^{N} and t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R}. By claim 3 of Constants, Coordinate Functions, Sums and Products of CkC^k Functions on a Euclidean Open Set, applied to gg and the scalar tt, then to ff and tgtg, and to ff and gg, the functions f+tgf+tg and fgfg are of class C1C^{1} on RN\mathbb{R}^{N}. The partial derivatives of ff and gg exist at every point by clause 1 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set, read through its clause 3, so by claim 1 of Constants, Coordinate Functions, Sums and Products of CkC^k Functions on a Euclidean Open Set, applied in the same way, ∂i(f+tg)=∂if+t ∂ig\partial_{i}(f+tg)=\partial_{i}f+t\,\partial_{i}g and ∂i(fg)=∂if g+f ∂ig\partial_{i}(fg)=\partial_{i}f\,g+f\,\partial_{i}g pointwise on RN\mathbb{R}^{N}, for every i∈[N]i\in[N]. By these formulas, Cb1(RN)C^{1}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{N}) (Bounded Continuously Differentiable Functions with Bounded Partial Derivatives on Euclidean Space §bounded) is closed under sums, real multiples and products.

(b) Lifting. Let n≤Nn\le N, π:RN→Rn\pi:\mathbb{R}^{N}\to\mathbb{R}^{n}, π(y)=(y1,…,yn)\pi(y)=(y_{1},\dots,y_{n}), and let f:Rn→Rf:\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R} be of class C1C^{1}. For y∈RNy\in\mathbb{R}^{N} the slice of f∘πf\circ\pi at yy in the ii-th variable is the slice of ff at π(y)\pi(y) if i≤ni\le n (both taken on a common interval, every radius being admissible in claim 1 of Slice Function and the Partial Derivative, the domains being whole Euclidean spaces) and is constant if n<i≤Nn<i\le N; so by claim 2 of Slice Function and the Partial Derivative and claim 1 of Sum, Constant Multiple, and Product Rules for One-Dimensional Derivatives, ∂i(f∘π)=(∂if)∘π\partial_{i}(f\circ\pi)=(\partial_{i}f)\circ\pi for i≤ni\le n and ∂i(f∘π)=0\partial_{i}(f\circ\pi)=0 for n<i≤Nn<i\le N. The coordinate functions y↦yly\mapsto y_{l} (l∈[n]l\in[n]) of π\pi are smooth, hence of class C1C^{1}, on RN\mathbb{R}^{N} by claim 2 of Constants, Coordinate Functions, Sums and Products of CkC^k Functions on a Euclidean Open Set and Smooth Map on a Euclidean Open Set; so π\pi is of class C1C^{1} on RN\mathbb{R}^{N} by clauses 1 and 3 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set, and f∘πf\circ\pi is of class C1C^{1} on RN\mathbb{R}^{N} by claim 2 of A Composition of CkC^k Maps Between Euclidean Open Sets is of Class CkC^k, applied with F=πF=\pi, the open set Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} in place of VV, and G=fG=f. By the formulas just obtained, f∘πf\circ\pi lies in Cb1(RN)C^{1}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{N}) if f∈Cb1(Rn)f\in C^{1}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{n}). Since pn=π∘pNp_{n}=\pi\circ p_{N} by Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §coordinates, f∘pn=(f∘π)∘pNf\circ p_{n}=(f\circ\pi)\circ p_{N}; in particular every φ∈FCb1(X)\varphi\in\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X) with representation (n,ψ)(n,\psi) has the representation (N,ψ∘π)(N,\psi\circ\pi) for every N≥nN\ge n.

(c) Composition with Θ\Theta. Let f:RN→Rf:\mathbb{R}^{N}\to\mathbb{R} be of class C1C^{1}. By Derivative and Continuity of the Scaled Exponential Function with c=−1/βc=-1/\beta, Θ\Theta is differentiable at every point of the interval R\mathbb{R} with Θ′(s)=−β−1Θ(s)\Theta'(s)=-\beta^{-1}\Theta(s), and continuous on (R,dR)(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}). The slice of Θ∘f\Theta\circ f at yy in the ii-th variable is Θ\Theta composed with the slice of ff, so by Chain Rule for One-Dimensional Derivatives and claim 2 of Slice Function and the Partial Derivative, ∂i(Θ∘f)=−β−1(Θ∘f) ∂if\partial_{i}(\Theta\circ f)=-\beta^{-1}(\Theta\circ f)\,\partial_{i}f. For a real-valued function on Rq\mathbb{R}^{q} (q∈Nq\in\mathbb{N}), continuity at a point in the sense of Continuity at a Point for Maps Between Euclidean Spaces is the same as continuity at that point from (Rq,dE)(\mathbb{R}^{q},d_{E}) to (R,dR)(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}) in the sense of Continuous Map Between Metric Spaces, since dE(y,y′)d_{E}(y,y') is the nonnegative square root of ∑i(yi−yi′)2\sum_{i}(y_{i}-y'_{i})^{2}, ∣s∣2=s2|s|^{2}=s^{2}, and r<δr<\delta exactly when r2<δ2r^{2}<\delta^{2} for nonnegative rr and positive δ\delta. So Θ\Theta (with q=1q=1) is continuous at every point in the first sense, and Θ∘f\Theta\circ f is continuous at every point by clause 1 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set and Composition of Continuous Euclidean Maps; Θ∘f\Theta\circ f and ∂if\partial_{i}f (clause 1 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set) are then continuous on RN\mathbb{R}^{N} in the second sense, hence so is −β−1(Θ∘f) ∂if-\beta^{-1}(\Theta\circ f)\,\partial_{i}f by Continuity of Sums and Products of Real-Valued Functions on a Metric Space §on-set, and so it is continuous at every point in the first sense. Hence Θ∘f\Theta\circ f is of class C1C^{1} by clause 1 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set, read through its clause 3.

(d) Cylindrical functions. Let F,φ∈FCb1(X)F,\varphi\in\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X) and t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R}. By (b) they have representations (N,ψ1)(N,\psi_{1}), (N,ψ2)(N,\psi_{2}) with a common NN; by (a), (N,ψ1ψ2)(N,\psi_{1}\psi_{2}) and (N,ψ1+tψ2)(N,\psi_{1}+t\psi_{2}) are representations of FφF\varphi and F+tφF+t\varphi, which therefore belong to FCb1(X)\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X) (Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions on a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis §cylindrical); and by Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §partial and (a), for every k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}

∂k(Fφ)=∂kF φ+F ∂kφ,∂k(F+tφ)=∂kF+t ∂kφ,\partial_{k}(F\varphi)=\partial_{k}F\,\varphi+F\,\partial_{k}\varphi,\qquad\partial_{k}(F+t\varphi)=\partial_{k}F+t\,\partial_{k}\varphi,

all terms vanishing for k>Nk>N. A constant function belongs to FCb1(X)\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X) by Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §linear; explicitly, the function with constant value b′∈Rb'\in\mathbb{R} has the representation (1,ψb′)(1,\psi_{b'}), where ψb′:R1→R\psi_{b'}:\mathbb{R}^{1}\to\mathbb{R} is the constant function with value b′b', which is smooth, hence of class C1C^{1}, by claim 2 of Constants, Coordinate Functions, Sums and Products of CkC^k Functions on a Euclidean Open Set and Smooth Map on a Euclidean Open Set, and whose partial derivative vanishes by claim 1 of Sum, Constant Multiple, and Product Rules for One-Dimensional Derivatives and claim 2 of Slice Function and the Partial Derivative, its slices being constant; so ψb′∈Cb1(R1)\psi_{b'}\in C^{1}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{1}), and the partial derivatives of the constant function vanish by Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §partial.

Step 2 (Integration by parts against the Gibbs measure). For u∈FCb1(X)u\in\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X) and k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} put

ru,k(x)=(xkck+∂kV(x)β)u(x)−∂ku(x)(x∈X).r_{u,k}(x)=\Bigl(\frac{x_{k}}{c_{k}}+\frac{\partial_{k}V(x)}{\beta}\Bigr)u(x)-\partial_{k}u(x)\qquad(x\in X).

We show: ru,kr_{u,k} is integrable with respect to γV\gamma^{V} and ∫Xru,k dγV=0\int_{X}r_{u,k}\,d\gamma^{V}=0. It is Borel: x↦xkx\mapsto x_{k} is Borel by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity, uu and ∂ku\partial_{k}u by Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §bounded-borel, ∂kV\partial_{k}V as noted, and claims 2 and 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions apply (ck>0c_{k}>0 by Variance Sequences and Their Truncations §variances).

Let (nu,χ)(n_{u},\chi) be a representation of uu and N=max⁡{nu,d}N=\max\{n_{u},d\}. By Step 1(b), u=χ~∘pNu=\tilde{\chi}\circ p_{N} with χ~=χ∘π∈Cb1(RN)\tilde{\chi}=\chi\circ\pi\in C^{1}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{N}) (π\pi the projection onto the first nun_{u} coordinates), and, vv being of class C2C^{2} and so of class C1C^{1} (clause 2 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set), V=v~∘pNV=\tilde{v}\circ p_{N} with v~=v∘π′\tilde{v}=v\circ\pi' of class C1C^{1} (π′\pi' the projection onto the first dd coordinates), ∂iv~=(∂iv)∘π′\partial_{i}\tilde{v}=(\partial_{i}v)\circ\pi' for i≤di\le d and ∂iv~=0\partial_{i}\tilde{v}=0 for d<i≤Nd<i\le N. Comparing with Admissible Cylindrical Potentials on a Hilbert Space in the Noise Geometry §gradient, (∂kv~)∘pN=∂kV(\partial_{k}\tilde{v})\circ p_{N}=\partial_{k}V for k≤Nk\le N, and ∂kV=0\partial_{k}V=0 for k>Nk>N. Put ψ=χ~ (Θ∘v~)\psi=\tilde{\chi}\,(\Theta\circ\tilde{v}). By Step 1(a),(c), ψ\psi is of class C1C^{1} on RN\mathbb{R}^{N} with

∂iψ=(∂iχ~−1β χ~ ∂iv~)(Θ∘v~),\partial_{i}\psi=\Bigl(\partial_{i}\tilde{\chi}-\frac{1}{\beta}\,\tilde{\chi}\,\partial_{i}\tilde{v}\Bigr)(\Theta\circ\tilde{v}),

so that, by Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §partial for the representation (N,χ~)(N,\tilde{\chi}) of uu,

ψ∘pN=u w,(∂kψ)∘pN=(∂ku−1β u ∂kV)w(k≤N).\psi\circ p_{N}=u\,w,\qquad(\partial_{k}\psi)\circ p_{N}=\Bigl(\partial_{k}u-\frac{1}{\beta}\,u\,\partial_{k}V\Bigr)w\quad(k\le N).

Growth bound. Let B≥0B\ge0 bound ∣χ~∣|\tilde{\chi}| and every ∣∂iχ~∣|\partial_{i}\tilde{\chi}|, and let A=max⁡i∈[d](C/ai)1/2A=\max_{i\in[d]}(C/a_{i})^{1/2}. Let y∈RNy\in\mathbb{R}^{N} and t=v~(y)=v(π′(y))≥−bt=\tilde{v}(y)=v(\pi'(y))\ge-b. For i≤di\le d, the slope bound gives ai(∂iv~(y))2≤∑l=1dal(∂lv(π′(y)))2≤C(1+∣t∣)2a_{i}(\partial_{i}\tilde{v}(y))^{2}\le\sum_{l=1}^{d}a_{l}(\partial_{l}v(\pi'(y)))^{2}\le C(1+|t|)^{2}, so ∣∂iv~(y)∣≤A(1+∣t∣)|\partial_{i}\tilde{v}(y)|\le A(1+|t|); for i>di>d, ∂iv~(y)=0\partial_{i}\tilde{v}(y)=0. Put s=t+b≥0s=t+b\ge0; then 1+∣t∣≤1+∣b∣+s1+|t|\le1+|b|+s (if t≥0t\ge0 then ∣t∣=t≤t+b+∣b∣|t|=t\le t+b+|b|; if t<0t<0 then ∣t∣=−t≤b|t|=-t\le b). By claims 1, 2 and 4 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function, Θ(t)=exp⁡(b/β)exp⁡(−s/β)\Theta(t)=\exp(b/\beta)\exp(-s/\beta), exp⁡(−s/β)=1/exp⁡(s/β)\exp(-s/\beta)=1/\exp(s/\beta), Θ(t)≤exp⁡(b/β)\Theta(t)\le\exp(b/\beta), and by The Function slog⁡ss\log s: Continuity, Young's Inequality and Lower Bounds, with the Elementary Bounds for the Exponential and the Logarithm §exp, exp⁡(s/β)≥1+s/β>0\exp(s/\beta)\ge1+s/\beta>0. Hence

(1+∣t∣) Θ(t)≤exp⁡(b/β) (1+∣b∣+s) ββ+s≤exp⁡(b/β) (1+∣b∣+β),(1+|t|)\,\Theta(t)\le\exp(b/\beta)\,\frac{(1+|b|+s)\,\beta}{\beta+s}\le\exp(b/\beta)\,(1+|b|+\beta),

since β/(β+s)≤1\beta/(\beta+s)\le1 and sβ/(β+s)≤βs\beta/(\beta+s)\le\beta. Therefore, for all yy and i∈[N]i\in[N],

∣∂iψ(y)∣≤M:=Bexp⁡(b/β)(1+Aβ(1+∣b∣+β))≤M(1+∥y∥).|\partial_{i}\psi(y)|\le M:=B\exp(b/\beta)\Bigl(1+\frac{A}{\beta}(1+|b|+\beta)\Bigr)\le M(1+\lVert y\rVert).

Integration by parts. By Gaussian Integration by Parts for Functions of Finitely Many Coordinates Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on a Hilbert Space with n=Nn=N, this ψ\psi and this MM (the functions written φ\varphi and φi\varphi_{i} there being uwuw and (∂iψ)∘pN(\partial_{i}\psi)\circ p_{N}), the functions uwuw, (∂iψ)∘pN(\partial_{i}\psi)\circ p_{N} and x↦xku(x)w(x)x\mapsto x_{k}u(x)w(x) are integrable with respect to γc\gamma_{c} (Gaussian Integration by Parts for Functions of Finitely Many Coordinates Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on a Hilbert Space §integrable). If k≤Nk\le N, then ru,kw=ck−1xkuw−(∂kψ)∘pNr_{u,k}w=c_{k}^{-1}x_{k}uw-(\partial_{k}\psi)\circ p_{N} is integrable by linearity, and its integral is 00 by Gaussian Integration by Parts for Functions of Finitely Many Coordinates Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on a Hilbert Space §coordinate. If k>Nk>N, then ∂ku=0\partial_{k}u=0 (Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §partial) and ∂kV=0\partial_{k}V=0, so ru,kw=ck−1xkuwr_{u,k}w=c_{k}^{-1}x_{k}uw, integrable with integral 00 by Gaussian Integration by Parts for Functions of Finitely Many Coordinates Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on a Hilbert Space §orthogonal. In both cases Entropy and Score Relative to the Gibbs Measure Split into Their Gaussian Parts and the Potential, with a Fisher Information Bound §density shows that ru,kr_{u,k} is integrable with respect to γV\gamma^{V} and

∫Xru,k dγV=1ZV,β∫Xru,k w dγc=0.(2.1)\int_{X}r_{u,k}\,d\gamma^{V}=\frac{1}{Z_{V,\beta}}\int_{X}r_{u,k}\,w\,d\gamma_{c}=0. \tag{2.1}

Step 3 (The Gibbs entropy pair). Since ck≤κakc_{k}\le\kappa a_{k} for all kk, the hypothesis of the Gibbs entropy pair holds with this κ\kappa; let (D,DΣ,E,Σ)(\mathcal{D},\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma},\mathcal{E},\Sigma) be the Gibbs entropy pair with potential VV and temperature β\beta. It is a noise penalty pair on Pρa\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho} by The Gibbs Entropy Pair is a Noise Penalty Pair, with Nonnegative Penalty and Dense Score Domain §pair, and it is λ\lambda-displacement convex by The Gibbs Entropy Pair of a K-Semiconvex Potential is Lambda-Displacement Convex with Lambda the Temperature over the Variance-to-Noise Bound Minus K §convex, KK being nonnegative and the semiconvexity constant of VV. We record:

(F1) For μ∈D\mu\in\mathcal{D}: μ\mu has finite relative entropy with respect to γc\gamma_{c} and VV is integrable with respect to μ\mu by Entropy and Score Relative to the Gibbs Measure Split into Their Gaussian Parts and the Potential, with a Fisher Information Bound §entropy; μ∈P2(X)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X) and each ∂kV\partial_{k}V is integrable with respect to μ\mu by Entropy and Score Relative to the Gibbs Measure Split into Their Gaussian Parts and the Potential, with a Fisher Information Bound §domain; and D⊆Pρa\mathcal{D}\subseteq\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho} by The Gibbs Entropy Pair on the Noise Wasserstein Space: Relative Entropy to the Gibbs Measure and the Gibbs Score Field §penalty-domain.

(F2) For μ∈DΣ\mu\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}: by (F1) and Entropy and Score Relative to the Gibbs Measure Split into Their Gaussian Parts and the Potential, with a Fisher Information Bound §splitting, μ\mu has a relative score with respect to γc\gamma_{c}, finite Fisher information relative to γc\gamma_{c} with weights aa, and ∫X∣∇aV∣a2 dμ<∞\int_{X}|\nabla_{a}V|_{a}^{2}\,d\mu<\infty; so Entropy and Score Relative to the Gibbs Measure Split into Their Gaussian Parts and the Potential, with a Fisher Information Bound §field applies and, with Σ(μ)=βZμa+∇aV\Sigma(\mu)=\beta Z^{a}_{\mu}+\nabla_{a}V (The Gibbs Entropy Pair on the Noise Wasserstein Space: Relative Entropy to the Gibbs Measure and the Gibbs Score Field §pair),

∥Σ(μ)∥μ2=β2 Ia(μ ∣ γV).(3.1)\lVert\Sigma(\mu)\rVert_{\mu}^{2}=\beta^{2}\,\mathcal{I}_{a}(\mu\,|\,\gamma^{V}). \tag{3.1}

Step 4 (The Gibbs measure is a zero of the score). The constant function 11 is a density of γV\gamma^{V} with respect to itself, since ∫X1A⋅1 dγV=γV(A)\int_{X}\mathbf{1}_{A}\cdot1\,d\gamma^{V}=\gamma^{V}(A) for A∈B(X)A\in\mathcal{B}(X) (integral of an indicator); and ϕ(1)=log⁡1=log⁡exp⁡(0)=0\phi(1)=\log1=\log\exp(0)=0 by The Natural Logarithm and claim 1 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function. So ϕ∘1\phi\circ1 is the zero function, integrable with integral 00: γV\gamma^{V} has finite relative entropy with respect to itself (Relative Entropy of Probability Measures §relative-entropy), γV∈D\gamma^{V}\in\mathcal{D}, H(γV ∣ γV)=0H(\gamma^{V}\,|\,\gamma^{V})=0 and E(γV)=0\mathcal{E}(\gamma^{V})=0.

By (F1), γV∈P2(X)\gamma^{V}\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X) and every ∂kV\partial_{k}V is integrable with respect to γV\gamma^{V}, so The Relative Score with Respect to the Gibbs Measure of an Admissible Cylindrical Potential applies to γV\gamma^{V}. For k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} let ζkV\zeta^{V}_{k} be the zero vector of L2(γV)L^{2}(\gamma^{V}). For every φ∈FCb1(X)\varphi\in\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X), ⟨ζkV,φ⟩L2(γV)=0\langle\zeta^{V}_{k},\varphi\rangle_{L^{2}(\gamma^{V})}=0 by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space §zero, and ∫Xrφ,k dγV=0\int_{X}r_{\varphi,k}\,d\gamma^{V}=0 by (2.1). So (ζkV)k∈N(\zeta^{V}_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} is the relative score of γV\gamma^{V} with respect to γV\gamma^{V} (The Relative Score with Respect to the Gibbs Measure of an Admissible Cylindrical Potential §score); the series ∑kak∥ζkV∥2\sum_{k}a_{k}\lVert\zeta^{V}_{k}\rVert^{2} has all terms 00, so it converges with sum 00 (Series of Real Numbers §convergent), and γV\gamma^{V} has finite Fisher information relative to γV\gamma^{V} with weights aa, with Ia(γV ∣ γV)=0\mathcal{I}_{a}(\gamma^{V}\,|\,\gamma^{V})=0 (The Weighted Fisher Information Relative to the Gibbs Measure of an Admissible Cylindrical Potential §information). Hence γV∈DΣ\gamma^{V}\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} by The Gibbs Entropy Pair on the Noise Wasserstein Space: Relative Entropy to the Gibbs Measure and the Gibbs Score Field §score-domain, and by (3.1) ∥Σ(γV)∥γV=0\lVert\Sigma(\gamma^{V})\rVert_{\gamma^{V}}=0. As L2(γV;Xa)L^{2}(\gamma^{V};X^{a}) is a real Hilbert space with this norm (Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space Transported in the Noise Norm: Standing Notation §fields, The Space of Square-Integrable Hilbert-Valued Maps is a Real Hilbert Space: Coordinates and Synthesis §hilbert), Σ(γV)\Sigma(\gamma^{V}) is its zero vector by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space §vanishing. Thus Talagrand, HWI and Log-Sobolev Inequalities for a Uniformly Displacement Convex Noise Penalty Pair with a Point of Zero Score applies to the pair, this λ\lambda, and μ∗=γV\mu_{*}=\gamma^{V}, with E(μ∗)=0\mathcal{E}(\mu_{*})=0.

Step 5 (Claim 1). Let μ\mu be as in claim 1. Then μ∈D\mu\in\mathcal{D} and, by The Gibbs Entropy Pair on the Noise Wasserstein Space: Relative Entropy to the Gibbs Measure and the Gibbs Score Field §score-domain, μ∈DΣ\mu\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}. By Talagrand, HWI and Log-Sobolev Inequalities for a Uniformly Displacement Convex Noise Penalty Pair with a Point of Zero Score §log-sobolev and (3.1),

β H(μ ∣ γV)=E(μ)−E(γV)≤12λ ∥Σ(μ)∥μ2=β22λ Ia(μ ∣ γV).\beta\,H(\mu\,|\,\gamma^{V})=\mathcal{E}(\mu)-\mathcal{E}(\gamma^{V})\le\frac{1}{2\lambda}\,\lVert\Sigma(\mu)\rVert_{\mu}^{2}=\frac{\beta^{2}}{2\lambda}\,\mathcal{I}_{a}(\mu\,|\,\gamma^{V}).

Dividing by β>0\beta>0 and using 1/λ=κ/(β−κK)1/\lambda=\kappa/(\beta-\kappa K) gives H(μ ∣ γV)≤κβ2(β−κK) Ia(μ ∣ γV)H(\mu\,|\,\gamma^{V})\le\frac{\kappa\beta}{2(\beta-\kappa K)}\,\mathcal{I}_{a}(\mu\,|\,\gamma^{V}).

Step 6 (Claim 2). Let μ\mu have finite relative entropy with respect to γV\gamma^{V}. Then μ∈D\mu\in\mathcal{D}, and γV∈D\gamma^{V}\in\mathcal{D} by Step 4; both lie in Pρa\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho} by (F1). By Talagrand, HWI and Log-Sobolev Inequalities for a Uniformly Displacement Convex Noise Penalty Pair with a Point of Zero Score §talagrand with ν=μ\nu=\mu, and The Noise Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure: Existence of Noise-Optimal Couplings, Comparison with the Quadratic Wasserstein Distance and Lower Semicontinuity §symmetry,

λ2 Wa(μ,γV)2=0+λ2 Wa(γV,μ)2≤E(μ)=β H(μ ∣ γV),\frac{\lambda}{2}\,W_{a}(\mu,\gamma^{V})^{2}=0+\frac{\lambda}{2}\,W_{a}(\gamma^{V},\mu)^{2}\le\mathcal{E}(\mu)=\beta\,H(\mu\,|\,\gamma^{V}),

so Wa(μ,γV)2≤2βλH(μ ∣ γV)=2κββ−κKH(μ ∣ γV)W_{a}(\mu,\gamma^{V})^{2}\le\frac{2\beta}{\lambda}H(\mu\,|\,\gamma^{V})=\frac{2\kappa\beta}{\beta-\kappa K}H(\mu\,|\,\gamma^{V}).

Step 7 (A bound for ϕ\phi). Let L≥0L\ge0 and let G:X→[0,L]G:X\to[0,L] be Borel. Then ϕ∘G\phi\circ G is Borel by The Function slog⁡ss\log s: Continuity, Young's Inequality and Lower Bounds, with the Elementary Bounds for the Exponential and the Logarithm §continuous, −e−1≤ϕ∘G-e^{-1}\le\phi\circ G with e−1=exp⁡(−1)e^{-1}=\exp(-1) by The Function slog⁡ss\log s: Continuity, Young's Inequality and Lower Bounds, with the Elementary Bounds for the Exponential and the Logarithm §lower, and for 0<s≤L0<s\le L, ϕ(s)=slog⁡s≤s(s−1)≤L2\phi(s)=s\log s\le s(s-1)\le L^{2} by The Function slog⁡ss\log s: Continuity, Young's Inequality and Lower Bounds, with the Elementary Bounds for the Exponential and the Logarithm §log, while ϕ(0)=0\phi(0)=0. So ∣ϕ∘G∣≤e−1+L2|\phi\circ G|\le e^{-1}+L^{2}, and GG, ϕ∘G\phi\circ G are bounded Borel functions, integrable with respect to every Borel probability measure on XX. In particular, for F∈FCb1(X)F\in\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X), which is Borel with ∣F∣≤B|F|\le B for some B≥0B\ge0 by Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §bounded-borel, the functions F2F^{2} and ϕ∘F2\phi\circ F^{2} are bounded and Borel (claim 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions), hence integrable with respect to γV\gamma^{V}; this is the first assertion of claim 3.

Step 8 (Claim 3 for F2+εF^{2}+\varepsilon). Let F∈FCb1(X)F\in\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X) with representation (n,ψF)(n,\psi_{F}), ∣F∣≤B|F|\le B and ∣∂kF∣≤Bk|\partial_{k}F|\le B_{k} (Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §bounded-borel), and fix a positive ε∈R\varepsilon\in\mathbb{R}. By Step 1(d) applied to FF and FF, F2∈FCb1(X)F^{2}\in\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X) with ∂k(F2)=2F ∂kF\partial_{k}(F^{2})=2F\,\partial_{k}F; by Step 1(d) applied to F2F^{2} and the constant function 11, with t=εt=\varepsilon, g=F2+ε∈FCb1(X)g=F^{2}+\varepsilon\in\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X) with ∂kg=2F ∂kF\partial_{k}g=2F\,\partial_{k}F for every kk (so ∂kg=0\partial_{k}g=0 for k>nk>n, by Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §partial for FF), and ε≤g≤B2+ε\varepsilon\le g\le B^{2}+\varepsilon. Following the construction of Step 1(d), with the representations (n,ψF)(n,\psi_{F}) of FF and (1,ψb′)(1,\psi_{b'}) of 11 (Step 1(d) with b′=1b'=1) lifted by Step 1(b) to a common dimension N≥nN\ge n, gg has a representation (N,ψg)(N,\psi_{g}) with ψg=ψ~F2+ε\psi_{g}=\tilde{\psi}_{F}^{2}+\varepsilon, where ψ~F=ψF∘π\tilde{\psi}_{F}=\psi_{F}\circ\pi and π\pi is the projection onto the first nn coordinates; in particular ψg(y)≥ε>0\psi_{g}(y)\ge\varepsilon>0 for every y∈RNy\in\mathbb{R}^{N}.

(a) The measure. Put m=∫Xg dγVm=\int_{X}g\,d\gamma^{V}; by monotonicity and claim 6(a) of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space, ε≤m\varepsilon\le m. Let h=g/mh=g/m, a Borel function with ε/m≤h≤(B2+ε)/ε\varepsilon/m\le h\le(B^{2}+\varepsilon)/\varepsilon and ∫Xh dγV=1\int_{X}h\,d\gamma^{V}=1. By claim 3 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables, μ(A)=∫X1Ah dγV\mu(A)=\int_{X}\mathbf{1}_{A}h\,d\gamma^{V} defines a measure μ\mu on B(X)\mathcal{B}(X) with μ(X)=1\mu(X)=1, so μ∈P(X)\mu\in\mathcal{P}(X), and for every Borel ff, ff is integrable with respect to μ\mu if and only if fhfh is integrable with respect to γV\gamma^{V}, in which case ∫Xf dμ=∫Xfh dγV\int_{X}f\,d\mu=\int_{X}fh\,d\gamma^{V}. Thus hh is a density of μ\mu with respect to γV\gamma^{V}, ϕ∘h\phi\circ h is integrable by Step 7, and μ\mu has finite relative entropy with respect to γV\gamma^{V} (Relative Entropy of Probability Measures §relative-entropy); so μ∈D\mu\in\mathcal{D}.

(b) The entropy. Since g=m hg=m\,h with m,hm,h positive, log⁡g=log⁡m+log⁡h\log g=\log m+\log h by The Natural Logarithm, so pointwise ϕ(h)=hlog⁡h=m−1ϕ(g)−m−1(log⁡m) g\phi(h)=h\log h=m^{-1}\phi(g)-m^{-1}(\log m)\,g. By Step 7, gg and ϕ∘g\phi\circ g are integrable with respect to γV\gamma^{V}, so Ent⁡γV(g)\operatorname{Ent}_{\gamma^{V}}(g) is defined (The Entropy of a Nonnegative Function with Respect to a Probability Measure §entropy), and by linearity

H(μ ∣ γV)=∫Xϕ∘h dγV=1m(∫Xϕ∘g dγV−mlog⁡m)=1mEnt⁡γV(g).H(\mu\,|\,\gamma^{V})=\int_{X}\phi\circ h\,d\gamma^{V}=\frac{1}{m}\Bigl(\int_{X}\phi\circ g\,d\gamma^{V}-m\log m\Bigr)=\frac{1}{m}\operatorname{Ent}_{\gamma^{V}}(g).

(c) The relative score. By (F1), μ∈P2(X)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X) and every ∂kV\partial_{k}V is integrable with respect to μ\mu, so The Relative Score with Respect to the Gibbs Measure of an Admissible Cylindrical Potential applies to μ\mu. The function ψg\psi_{g} is of class C1C^{1} on RN\mathbb{R}^{N}, hence continuous on (RN,dE)(\mathbb{R}^{N},d_{E}) by claim 3 of Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and CkC^k Maps are Continuous, and nowhere zero, so 1/ψg1/\psi_{g} is continuous on RN\mathbb{R}^{N} by claim 2 of Continuity of the Reciprocal of a Nonvanishing Real-Valued Function on a Metric Space and Borel by claims 2 and 3 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space; as pNp_{N} is Borel by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity, 1/g=(1/ψg)∘pN1/g=(1/\psi_{g})\circ p_{N} is Borel by claim 4 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space. For k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} let ζk=∂kg⋅(1/g)\zeta_{k}=\partial_{k}g\cdot(1/g), which is Borel by Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §bounded-borel and claim 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions, with ∣ζk∣≤2BBk/ε|\zeta_{k}|\le2BB_{k}/\varepsilon (ζk=0\zeta_{k}=0 for k>nk>n), so that ζk2\zeta_{k}^{2} is bounded and Borel, ζk\zeta_{k} is 22-integrable with respect to μ\mu, and its class lies in L2(μ)L^{2}(\mu). Let φ∈FCb1(X)\varphi\in\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X). By Step 1(d), gφ∈FCb1(X)g\varphi\in\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X) with ∂k(gφ)=∂kg φ+g ∂kφ\partial_{k}(g\varphi)=\partial_{k}g\,\varphi+g\,\partial_{k}\varphi, so pointwise

g rφ,k=(xkck+∂kVβ)gφ−g ∂kφ=rgφ,k+φ ∂kg.g\,r_{\varphi,k}=\Bigl(\frac{x_{k}}{c_{k}}+\frac{\partial_{k}V}{\beta}\Bigr)g\varphi-g\,\partial_{k}\varphi=r_{g\varphi,k}+\varphi\,\partial_{k}g .

By Step 2, rgφ,kr_{g\varphi,k} is integrable with respect to γV\gamma^{V} with integral 00, and φ ∂kg\varphi\,\partial_{k}g is bounded and Borel; so h rφ,k=m−1g rφ,kh\,r_{\varphi,k}=m^{-1}g\,r_{\varphi,k} is integrable with respect to γV\gamma^{V}, and by (a) and linearity

∫Xrφ,k dμ=∫Xrφ,k h dγV=1m∫Xφ ∂kg dγV=∫Xφ ζk h dγV=∫Xζk φ dμ=⟨ζk,φ⟩L2(μ),\int_{X}r_{\varphi,k}\,d\mu=\int_{X}r_{\varphi,k}\,h\,d\gamma^{V}=\frac{1}{m}\int_{X}\varphi\,\partial_{k}g\,d\gamma^{V}=\int_{X}\varphi\,\zeta_{k}\,h\,d\gamma^{V}=\int_{X}\zeta_{k}\,\varphi\,d\mu=\langle\zeta_{k},\varphi\rangle_{L^{2}(\mu)},

using ζkh=m−1∂kg\zeta_{k}h=m^{-1}\partial_{k}g, the bounded Borel function ζkφ\zeta_{k}\varphi, and The Lebesgue Space of Square-Integrable Functions is a Real Hilbert Space §inner-product. By The Relative Score with Respect to the Gibbs Measure of an Admissible Cylindrical Potential §score, (ζk)k∈N(\zeta_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} is the relative score of μ\mu with respect to γV\gamma^{V}.

(d) The Fisher information. By The Lebesgue Space of Square-Integrable Functions is a Real Hilbert Space §inner-product and (a), ∥ζk∥L2(μ)2=∫Xζk2h dγV=m−1∫X(∂kg)2/g dγV\lVert\zeta_{k}\rVert_{L^{2}(\mu)}^{2}=\int_{X}\zeta_{k}^{2}h\,d\gamma^{V}=m^{-1}\int_{X}(\partial_{k}g)^{2}/g\,d\gamma^{V}, the integrand (∂kg)2/g=ζk2 g(\partial_{k}g)^{2}/g=\zeta_{k}^{2}\,g being a product of bounded Borel functions (claim 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions); this is 00 for k>nk>n. So the series ∑kak∥ζk∥2\sum_{k}a_{k}\lVert\zeta_{k}\rVert^{2} converges (its partial sums are constant from the nn-th on), μ\mu has finite Fisher information relative to γV\gamma^{V} with weights aa (The Weighted Fisher Information Relative to the Gibbs Measure of an Admissible Cylindrical Potential §information), and, since (∂kg)2/g=4F2(∂kF)2/(F2+ε)≤4(∂kF)2(\partial_{k}g)^{2}/g=4F^{2}(\partial_{k}F)^{2}/(F^{2}+\varepsilon)\le4(\partial_{k}F)^{2}, monotonicity and The Noise Gradient of a Cylindrical Function and the Noise Tangent Space at a Probability Measure on a Hilbert Space §gradient give

Ia(μ ∣ γV)=1m∫X∑k=1nak(∂kg)2g dγV≤4m∫X∑k=1nak(∂kF)2 dγV=4m∫X∣∇aF∣a2 dγV,\mathcal{I}_{a}(\mu\,|\,\gamma^{V})=\frac{1}{m}\int_{X}\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}\frac{(\partial_{k}g)^{2}}{g}\,d\gamma^{V}\le\frac{4}{m}\int_{X}\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}(\partial_{k}F)^{2}\,d\gamma^{V}=\frac{4}{m}\int_{X}|\nabla_{a}F|_{a}^{2}\,d\gamma^{V},

the last integrand being bounded and Borel by that clause.

(e) Conclusion. By (a), (c) and (d), μ\mu satisfies the hypotheses of claim 1, so by Step 5, (b) and (d)

1mEnt⁡γV(F2+ε)≤κβ2(β−κK)⋅4m∫X∣∇aF∣a2 dγV,\frac{1}{m}\operatorname{Ent}_{\gamma^{V}}(F^{2}+\varepsilon)\le\frac{\kappa\beta}{2(\beta-\kappa K)}\cdot\frac{4}{m}\int_{X}|\nabla_{a}F|_{a}^{2}\,d\gamma^{V},

and multiplying by m>0m>0,

Ent⁡γV(F2+ε)≤2κββ−κK∫X∣∇aF∣a2 dγV.(8.1)\operatorname{Ent}_{\gamma^{V}}(F^{2}+\varepsilon)\le\frac{2\kappa\beta}{\beta-\kappa K}\int_{X}|\nabla_{a}F|_{a}^{2}\,d\gamma^{V}. \tag{8.1}

Step 9 (Claim 3). Apply (8.1) with ε=1/j\varepsilon=1/j, j∈Nj\in\mathbb{N}. For each x∈Xx\in X, F(x)2+1/j→F(x)2F(x)^{2}+1/j\to F(x)^{2}, so ϕ(F(x)2+1/j)→ϕ(F(x)2)\phi(F(x)^{2}+1/j)\to\phi(F(x)^{2}) by the continuity of ϕ\phi (The Function slog⁡ss\log s: Continuity, Young's Inequality and Lower Bounds, with the Elementary Bounds for the Exponential and the Logarithm §continuous, unwound through the ε\varepsilon-δ\delta condition of Continuous Map Between Metric Spaces); and ∣ϕ∘(F2+1/j)∣≤e−1+(B2+1)2|\phi\circ(F^{2}+1/j)|\le e^{-1}+(B^{2}+1)^{2} by Step 7 with L=B2+1L=B^{2}+1, a constant, integrable with respect to γV\gamma^{V}. By Dominated Convergence Theorem, ∫Xϕ∘(F2+1/j) dγV→∫Xϕ∘F2 dγV\int_{X}\phi\circ(F^{2}+1/j)\,d\gamma^{V}\to\int_{X}\phi\circ F^{2}\,d\gamma^{V}. Also ∫X(F2+1/j) dγV=∫XF2 dγV+1/j→∫XF2 dγV\int_{X}(F^{2}+1/j)\,d\gamma^{V}=\int_{X}F^{2}\,d\gamma^{V}+1/j\to\int_{X}F^{2}\,d\gamma^{V} by linearity and claim 6(a) of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space, so ϕ(∫X(F2+1/j) dγV)→ϕ(∫XF2 dγV)\phi\bigl(\int_{X}(F^{2}+1/j)\,d\gamma^{V}\bigr)\to\phi\bigl(\int_{X}F^{2}\,d\gamma^{V}\bigr) by continuity of ϕ\phi. Hence, by The Entropy of a Nonnegative Function with Respect to a Probability Measure §entropy, Ent⁡γV(F2+1/j)→Ent⁡γV(F2)\operatorname{Ent}_{\gamma^{V}}(F^{2}+1/j)\to\operatorname{Ent}_{\gamma^{V}}(F^{2}), and letting j→∞j\to\infty in (8.1), whose right-hand side does not depend on jj,

Ent⁡γβV(F2)≤2κββ−κK∫X∣∇aF∣a2 dγβV.\operatorname{Ent}_{\gamma^{V}_{\beta}}(F^{2})\le\frac{2\kappa\beta}{\beta-\kappa K}\int_{X}|\nabla_{a}F|_{a}^{2}\,d\gamma^{V}_{\beta}.

This proves claim 3.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…