Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement; it is applied to the data named at the point of use.
Numerals and order. Write 2=1+1 and 3=2+1. By claim 6 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field one has 0<1; claim 3 of that lemma, applied with 0<1 and rβ€r, gives r<r+1 for every rβR, so 0<1<2<3, and claim 2 of that lemma gives 0<2, 0<3 and 1<3. The additive identity and additive inverses of the field R give 1β0=1 and 3β1=2. The order of R is a total order, as recorded in the preamble of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field; we use below that a real number which is neither zero nor negative is positive, and that two real numbers neither of which is less than the other are equal.
Standing facts about cos and sin. Every point of R is an interior point of the interval R by Basic Facts about Intervals of the Real Line (i), and by Basic Facts about Intervals of the Real Line (v) a closed interval [a,b] with a<b is an interval every point of which strictly between a and b is an interior point of it. By Uniform Convergence, Continuity, Parity and Derivatives of Sine and Cosine (ii) and claim 1 of Restriction Stability of Continuity and of the Derivative, the restriction of cos or of sin to such an [a,b] is continuous on [a,b]; by Uniform Convergence, Continuity, Parity and Derivatives of Sine and Cosine (v) and claim 2 of Restriction Stability of Continuity and of the Derivative, it is differentiable at every t with a<t<b, with derivative βsint in the case of cos and cost in the case of sin. So Mean Value Theorem on a Closed Real Interval and on Any Interval and Intermediate Value Theorem on a Closed Real Interval, and Continuous Images of Intervals apply to these restrictions, and are used below without repeating this verification. Also cos0=1 and sin0=0 by Uniform Convergence, Continuity, Parity and Derivatives of Sine and Cosine (iii).
Claim 1 (mean value identities). Let a,bβR with a<b. Then there are c,d with a<c<b and a<d<b such that
sinbβsina=cos(c)(bβa),cosbβcosa=βsin(d)(bβa).
Indeed claim 1 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, applied with c=βa, turns a<b into 0=aβa<bβa, so bβa is nonzero and, by claim 7 of that lemma, invertible; Mean Value Theorem on a Closed Real Interval and on Any Interval, applied to the restriction of sin to [a,b], gives cβ(a,b) with cosc=(sinbβsina)(bβa)β1, and multiplying by bβa gives the first identity. The second follows in the same way from the restriction of cos, whose derivative at d is βsind.
Claim 2 (a negative value forces an earlier zero). Let tβR with 0β€t and cost<0. Then there is c with 0β€cβ€t and cosc=0.
Since cos0=1 and 0<1, we have cost<0<1=cos0, so tξ =0 and hence 0<t. Then costβ€0β€cos0, so Intermediate Value Theorem on a Closed Real Interval, and Continuous Images of Intervals, applied to the restriction of cos to [0,t] with y=0, gives cβ[0,t] with cosc=0.
Claim 3 (the cosine has a zero in [0,3]). The set
Z={tβR:0β€tβ€3Β andΒ cost=0}
is nonempty.
Suppose Z is empty; we derive a contradiction in five steps.
(i) 0<cost for every t with 0β€tβ€3. Such a t has costξ =0, since otherwise tβZ. If cost<0, Claim 2 gives c with 0β€cβ€tβ€3 and cosc=0, so cβZ, again impossible. Being neither zero nor negative, cost is positive.
(ii) 0<sint for every t with 0<tβ€3. By Claim 1 on [0,t] there is c with 0<c<t and sint=sintβsin0=cos(c)(tβ0)=cos(c)t. Here 0<cosc by (i), since 0β€cβ€3, and 0<t; so 0<sint by claim 5 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field.
(iii) If 0β€u<vβ€3 then sinu<sinv and cosv<cosu. By Claim 1 on [u,v] there are c,d with u<c<v and u<d<v such that sinvβsinu=cos(c)(vβu) and cosvβcosu=βsin(d)(vβu). Now 0<vβu, and 0<cosc by (i) while 0<sind by (ii), because 0<d and dβ€3. Hence 0<cos(c)(vβu) and 0<sin(d)(vβu) by claim 5 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. Since cos(c)(vβu)=sinvβsinu, claim 1 of that lemma, applied with c=sinu, turns 0<sinvβsinu into sinu<sinv; and since sin(d)(vβu)=cosuβcosv, the same claim applied with c=cosv turns 0<cosuβcosv into cosv<cosu.
(iv) 1<sin1+sin1. By Claim 1 on [0,1] there is c with 0<c<1 and sin1=sin1βsin0=cos(c)(1β0)=cosc; by (iii) with u=c, v=1 we get cos1<cosc=sin1. Again by Claim 1 on [0,1] there is d with 0<d<1 and cos1β1=cos1βcos0=βsin(d)(1β0)=βsind, that is cos1=1βsind; by (iii) with u=d, v=1 we get sind<sin1, so claim 4 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives βsin1<βsind and claim 1 of that lemma, applied with c=1, gives 1βsin1<1βsind=cos1. Chaining this with cos1<sin1 by claim 2 of that lemma yields 1βsin1<sin1, and claim 1 once more, applied with c=sin1, turns that into 1<sin1+sin1.
(v) By Claim 1 on [1,3] there is d with 1<d<3 and cos3βcos1=βsin(d)(3β1)=β2sind, that is cos3=cos1β2sind. By (iii) with u=1, v=d we get sin1<sind, so claim 10 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, applied with the factor 2, which is positive by claim 8 of that lemma, gives 2sin1<2sind; and 2sin1=(1+1)sin1=sin1+sin1 by distributivity and the multiplicative identity, so (iv) and claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field give 1<2sind. Claim 4 of that lemma turns this into β2sind<β1, and claim 3 of that lemma, applied with β2sind<β1 and cos1β€cos1, gives
cos3=cos1β2sind<cos1β1.
By The Pythagorean Identity for Sine and Cosine (ii) and claim 3 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field we have cos1β€β£cos1β£β€1; transitivity of β€, obtained from claims 2 and 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, gives cos1β€1, and claim 3 of that lemma gives cos1β1β€0. Hence cos3<0 by claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, contradicting (i). Therefore Z is nonempty.
Claim 4 (clause 1). By Claim 3 the set Z is nonempty, and 0 is a lower bound for it, so x0β=infZ exists by Existence of the Infimum of a Nonempty Subset of R Bounded Below. As 0 is a lower bound and infZ is the greatest lower bound, 0β€x0β; and choosing any zβZ gives x0ββ€zβ€3, so transitivity of β€ gives x0ββ€3 and x0β lies in [0,3].
(a) cosx0β=0. Suppose not, and put Ξ΅=β£cosx0ββ£, which is positive by claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field. By Uniform Convergence, Continuity, Parity and Derivatives of Sine and Cosine (ii) and continuity of cos at x0β relative to R, formed with the metric dRβ of The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background (i), there is Ξ΄>0 such that every tβR with β£tβx0ββ£<Ξ΄ satisfies β£costβcosx0ββ£<Ξ΅. No such t lies in Z: if cost=0 then β£costβcosx0ββ£=β£βcosx0ββ£=β£cosx0ββ£=Ξ΅ by claim 2 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, not less than Ξ΅. But claim 4 of Approximation Property of the Supremum and the Infimum in R, applied to Z with the positive number Ξ΄, gives zβZ with z<x0β+Ξ΄; since x0β is a lower bound, x0ββ€z, so 0β€zβx0β by claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, while claim 1 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, applied to z<x0β+Ξ΄ with c=βx0β, gives zβx0β<Ξ΄. Therefore β£zβx0ββ£=zβx0β<Ξ΄ by Absolute Value in an Ordered Field. This is a contradiction, so cosx0β=0.
(b) 0<x0β. If x0β=0 then cosx0β=cos0=1, which is nonzero, contradicting (a). With 0β€x0β this gives 0<x0β.
(c) 0<cost for every t with 0β€t<x0β. Such a t satisfies t<x0ββ€3, so 0β€tβ€3; and tβ/Z, since x0β is a lower bound for Z and t<x0β. Hence costξ =0. If cost<0, Claim 2 gives c with 0β€cβ€tβ€3 and cosc=0, so cβZ while cβ€t<x0β, contradicting that x0β is a lower bound for Z. Being neither zero nor negative, cost is positive.
(d) Uniqueness. Let yβR satisfy 0<y, cosy=0 and 0<cost for every t with 0β€t<y. If y<x0β then 0β€y<x0β, so 0<cosy by (c), contradicting cosy=0. If x0β<y then 0β€x0β<y, so 0<cosx0β by the assumed property of y, contradicting (a). Neither is less than the other, so y=x0β.
Together with x0ββ€3 this proves clause 1.
Claim 5 (clause 2). Let t satisfy 0<tβ€x0β. By Claim 1 on [0,t] there is c with 0<c<t and sint=sintβsin0=cos(c)(tβ0)=cos(c)t. Here 0β€c and c<tβ€x0β, so 0<cosc by clause 1; with 0<t, claim 5 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives 0<sint.
In particular 0<sinx0β. By The Pythagorean Identity for Sine and Cosine (i),
(cosx0β)2+(sinx0β)2=1,
and (cosx0β)2=0β
0=0 by (a) of Claim 4 and claim 1 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field; hence (sinx0β)2=1=1β
1=12. Since 0<sinx0β gives 0β€sinx0β, and 0β€1 by claim 1 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, claim 3 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field gives sinx0β=1. This proves clause 2 and completes the proof.