TheoremBase

If the cosine had no zero in [0,3][0,3] it would be positive there, making the sine increasing and the cosine decreasing; two applications of the mean value theorem on [0,1][0,1] give 1<2sin⁑11<2\sin 1, and a third on [1,3][1,3] then forces cos⁑3<0\cos 3<0. The least positive zero is the infimum of the zero set, which belongs to it by continuity.

Proof

Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement; it is applied to the data named at the point of use.

Numerals and order. Write 2=1+12=1+1 and 3=2+13=2+1. By claim 6 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field one has 0<10<1; claim 3 of that lemma, applied with 0<10<1 and r≀rr\le r, gives r<r+1r<r+1 for every r∈Rr\in\mathbb{R}, so 0<1<2<30<1<2<3, and claim 2 of that lemma gives 0<20<2, 0<30<3 and 1<31<3. The additive identity and additive inverses of the field R\mathbb{R} give 1βˆ’0=11-0=1 and 3βˆ’1=23-1=2. The order of R\mathbb{R} is a total order, as recorded in the preamble of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field; we use below that a real number which is neither zero nor negative is positive, and that two real numbers neither of which is less than the other are equal.

Standing facts about cos⁑\cos and sin⁑\sin. Every point of R\mathbb{R} is an interior point of the interval R\mathbb{R} by Basic Facts about Intervals of the Real Line (i), and by Basic Facts about Intervals of the Real Line (v) a closed interval [a,b][a,b] with a<ba<b is an interval every point of which strictly between aa and bb is an interior point of it. By Uniform Convergence, Continuity, Parity and Derivatives of Sine and Cosine (ii) and claim 1 of Restriction Stability of Continuity and of the Derivative, the restriction of cos⁑\cos or of sin⁑\sin to such an [a,b][a,b] is continuous on [a,b][a,b]; by Uniform Convergence, Continuity, Parity and Derivatives of Sine and Cosine (v) and claim 2 of Restriction Stability of Continuity and of the Derivative, it is differentiable at every tt with a<t<ba<t<b, with derivative βˆ’sin⁑t-\sin t in the case of cos⁑\cos and cos⁑t\cos t in the case of sin⁑\sin. So Mean Value Theorem on a Closed Real Interval and on Any Interval and Intermediate Value Theorem on a Closed Real Interval, and Continuous Images of Intervals apply to these restrictions, and are used below without repeating this verification. Also cos⁑0=1\cos0=1 and sin⁑0=0\sin0=0 by Uniform Convergence, Continuity, Parity and Derivatives of Sine and Cosine (iii).

Claim 1 (mean value identities). Let a,b∈Ra,b\in\mathbb{R} with a<ba<b. Then there are c,dc,d with a<c<ba<c<b and a<d<ba<d<b such that

sin⁑bβˆ’sin⁑a=cos⁑(c) (bβˆ’a),cos⁑bβˆ’cos⁑a=βˆ’sin⁑(d) (bβˆ’a).\sin b-\sin a=\cos(c)\,(b-a), \qquad \cos b-\cos a=-\sin(d)\,(b-a).

Indeed claim 1 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, applied with c=βˆ’ac=-a, turns a<ba<b into 0=aβˆ’a<bβˆ’a0=a-a<b-a, so bβˆ’ab-a is nonzero and, by claim 7 of that lemma, invertible; Mean Value Theorem on a Closed Real Interval and on Any Interval, applied to the restriction of sin⁑\sin to [a,b][a,b], gives c∈(a,b)c\in(a,b) with cos⁑c=(sin⁑bβˆ’sin⁑a)(bβˆ’a)βˆ’1\cos c=(\sin b-\sin a)(b-a)^{-1}, and multiplying by bβˆ’ab-a gives the first identity. The second follows in the same way from the restriction of cos⁑\cos, whose derivative at dd is βˆ’sin⁑d-\sin d.

Claim 2 (a negative value forces an earlier zero). Let t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R} with 0≀t0\le t and cos⁑t<0\cos t<0. Then there is cc with 0≀c≀t0\le c\le t and cos⁑c=0\cos c=0.

Since cos⁑0=1\cos0=1 and 0<10<1, we have cos⁑t<0<1=cos⁑0\cos t<0<1=\cos 0, so tβ‰ 0t\ne0 and hence 0<t0<t. Then cos⁑t≀0≀cos⁑0\cos t\le0\le\cos0, so Intermediate Value Theorem on a Closed Real Interval, and Continuous Images of Intervals, applied to the restriction of cos⁑\cos to [0,t][0,t] with y=0y=0, gives c∈[0,t]c\in[0,t] with cos⁑c=0\cos c=0.

Claim 3 (the cosine has a zero in [0,3][0,3]). The set

Z={t∈R:0≀t≀3Β andΒ cos⁑t=0}Z=\{t\in\mathbb{R}:0\le t\le3\ \text{and}\ \cos t=0\}

is nonempty.

Suppose ZZ is empty; we derive a contradiction in five steps.

(i) 0<cos⁑t0<\cos t for every tt with 0≀t≀30\le t\le3. Such a tt has cos⁑tβ‰ 0\cos t\ne0, since otherwise t∈Zt\in Z. If cos⁑t<0\cos t<0, Claim 2 gives cc with 0≀c≀t≀30\le c\le t\le3 and cos⁑c=0\cos c=0, so c∈Zc\in Z, again impossible. Being neither zero nor negative, cos⁑t\cos t is positive.

(ii) 0<sin⁑t0<\sin t for every tt with 0<t≀30<t\le3. By Claim 1 on [0,t][0,t] there is cc with 0<c<t0<c<t and sin⁑t=sin⁑tβˆ’sin⁑0=cos⁑(c)(tβˆ’0)=cos⁑(c) t\sin t=\sin t-\sin0=\cos(c)(t-0)=\cos(c)\,t. Here 0<cos⁑c0<\cos c by (i), since 0≀c≀30\le c\le3, and 0<t0<t; so 0<sin⁑t0<\sin t by claim 5 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field.

(iii) If 0≀u<v≀30\le u<v\le3 then sin⁑u<sin⁑v\sin u<\sin v and cos⁑v<cos⁑u\cos v<\cos u. By Claim 1 on [u,v][u,v] there are c,dc,d with u<c<vu<c<v and u<d<vu<d<v such that sin⁑vβˆ’sin⁑u=cos⁑(c)(vβˆ’u)\sin v-\sin u=\cos(c)(v-u) and cos⁑vβˆ’cos⁑u=βˆ’sin⁑(d)(vβˆ’u)\cos v-\cos u=-\sin(d)(v-u). Now 0<vβˆ’u0<v-u, and 0<cos⁑c0<\cos c by (i) while 0<sin⁑d0<\sin d by (ii), because 0<d0<d and d≀3d\le3. Hence 0<cos⁑(c)(vβˆ’u)0<\cos(c)(v-u) and 0<sin⁑(d)(vβˆ’u)0<\sin(d)(v-u) by claim 5 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. Since cos⁑(c)(vβˆ’u)=sin⁑vβˆ’sin⁑u\cos(c)(v-u)=\sin v-\sin u, claim 1 of that lemma, applied with c=sin⁑uc=\sin u, turns 0<sin⁑vβˆ’sin⁑u0<\sin v-\sin u into sin⁑u<sin⁑v\sin u<\sin v; and since sin⁑(d)(vβˆ’u)=cos⁑uβˆ’cos⁑v\sin(d)(v-u)=\cos u-\cos v, the same claim applied with c=cos⁑vc=\cos v turns 0<cos⁑uβˆ’cos⁑v0<\cos u-\cos v into cos⁑v<cos⁑u\cos v<\cos u.

(iv) 1<sin⁑1+sin⁑11<\sin1+\sin1. By Claim 1 on [0,1][0,1] there is cc with 0<c<10<c<1 and sin⁑1=sin⁑1βˆ’sin⁑0=cos⁑(c)(1βˆ’0)=cos⁑c\sin1=\sin1-\sin0=\cos(c)(1-0)=\cos c; by (iii) with u=cu=c, v=1v=1 we get cos⁑1<cos⁑c=sin⁑1\cos1<\cos c=\sin1. Again by Claim 1 on [0,1][0,1] there is dd with 0<d<10<d<1 and cos⁑1βˆ’1=cos⁑1βˆ’cos⁑0=βˆ’sin⁑(d)(1βˆ’0)=βˆ’sin⁑d\cos1-1=\cos1-\cos0=-\sin(d)(1-0)=-\sin d, that is cos⁑1=1βˆ’sin⁑d\cos1=1-\sin d; by (iii) with u=du=d, v=1v=1 we get sin⁑d<sin⁑1\sin d<\sin1, so claim 4 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives βˆ’sin⁑1<βˆ’sin⁑d-\sin1<-\sin d and claim 1 of that lemma, applied with c=1c=1, gives 1βˆ’sin⁑1<1βˆ’sin⁑d=cos⁑11-\sin1<1-\sin d=\cos1. Chaining this with cos⁑1<sin⁑1\cos1<\sin1 by claim 2 of that lemma yields 1βˆ’sin⁑1<sin⁑11-\sin1<\sin1, and claim 1 once more, applied with c=sin⁑1c=\sin1, turns that into 1<sin⁑1+sin⁑11<\sin1+\sin1.

(v) By Claim 1 on [1,3][1,3] there is dd with 1<d<31<d<3 and cos⁑3βˆ’cos⁑1=βˆ’sin⁑(d)(3βˆ’1)=βˆ’2sin⁑d\cos3-\cos1=-\sin(d)(3-1)=-2\sin d, that is cos⁑3=cos⁑1βˆ’2sin⁑d\cos3=\cos1-2\sin d. By (iii) with u=1u=1, v=dv=d we get sin⁑1<sin⁑d\sin1<\sin d, so claim 10 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, applied with the factor 22, which is positive by claim 8 of that lemma, gives 2sin⁑1<2sin⁑d2\sin1<2\sin d; and 2sin⁑1=(1+1)sin⁑1=sin⁑1+sin⁑12\sin1=(1+1)\sin1=\sin1+\sin1 by distributivity and the multiplicative identity, so (iv) and claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field give 1<2sin⁑d1<2\sin d. Claim 4 of that lemma turns this into βˆ’2sin⁑d<βˆ’1-2\sin d<-1, and claim 3 of that lemma, applied with βˆ’2sin⁑d<βˆ’1-2\sin d<-1 and cos⁑1≀cos⁑1\cos1\le\cos1, gives

cos⁑3=cos⁑1βˆ’2sin⁑d<cos⁑1βˆ’1.\cos3=\cos1-2\sin d<\cos1-1 .

By The Pythagorean Identity for Sine and Cosine (ii) and claim 3 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field we have cos⁑1β‰€βˆ£cos⁑1βˆ£β‰€1\cos1\le|\cos1|\le1; transitivity of ≀\le, obtained from claims 2 and 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, gives cos⁑1≀1\cos1\le1, and claim 3 of that lemma gives cos⁑1βˆ’1≀0\cos1-1\le0. Hence cos⁑3<0\cos3<0 by claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, contradicting (i). Therefore ZZ is nonempty.

Claim 4 (clause 1). By Claim 3 the set ZZ is nonempty, and 00 is a lower bound for it, so x0=inf⁑Zx_{0}=\inf Z exists by Existence of the Infimum of a Nonempty Subset of R\mathbb{R} Bounded Below. As 00 is a lower bound and inf⁑Z\inf Z is the greatest lower bound, 0≀x00\le x_{0}; and choosing any z∈Zz\in Z gives x0≀z≀3x_{0}\le z\le3, so transitivity of ≀\le gives x0≀3x_{0}\le3 and x0x_{0} lies in [0,3][0,3].

(a) cos⁑x0=0\cos x_{0}=0. Suppose not, and put Ξ΅=∣cos⁑x0∣\varepsilon=|\cos x_{0}|, which is positive by claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field. By Uniform Convergence, Continuity, Parity and Derivatives of Sine and Cosine (ii) and continuity of cos⁑\cos at x0x_{0} relative to R\mathbb{R}, formed with the metric dRd_{\mathbb{R}} of The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background (i), there is Ξ΄>0\delta>0 such that every t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R} with ∣tβˆ’x0∣<Ξ΄|t-x_{0}|<\delta satisfies ∣cos⁑tβˆ’cos⁑x0∣<Ξ΅|\cos t-\cos x_{0}|<\varepsilon. No such tt lies in ZZ: if cos⁑t=0\cos t=0 then ∣cos⁑tβˆ’cos⁑x0∣=βˆ£βˆ’cos⁑x0∣=∣cos⁑x0∣=Ξ΅|\cos t-\cos x_{0}|=|-\cos x_{0}|=|\cos x_{0}|=\varepsilon by claim 2 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, not less than Ξ΅\varepsilon. But claim 4 of Approximation Property of the Supremum and the Infimum in R\mathbb{R}, applied to ZZ with the positive number Ξ΄\delta, gives z∈Zz\in Z with z<x0+Ξ΄z<x_{0}+\delta; since x0x_{0} is a lower bound, x0≀zx_{0}\le z, so 0≀zβˆ’x00\le z-x_{0} by claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, while claim 1 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, applied to z<x0+Ξ΄z<x_{0}+\delta with c=βˆ’x0c=-x_{0}, gives zβˆ’x0<Ξ΄z-x_{0}<\delta. Therefore ∣zβˆ’x0∣=zβˆ’x0<Ξ΄|z-x_{0}|=z-x_{0}<\delta by Absolute Value in an Ordered Field. This is a contradiction, so cos⁑x0=0\cos x_{0}=0.

(b) 0<x00<x_{0}. If x0=0x_{0}=0 then cos⁑x0=cos⁑0=1\cos x_{0}=\cos0=1, which is nonzero, contradicting (a). With 0≀x00\le x_{0} this gives 0<x00<x_{0}.

(c) 0<cos⁑t0<\cos t for every tt with 0≀t<x00\le t<x_{0}. Such a tt satisfies t<x0≀3t<x_{0}\le3, so 0≀t≀30\le t\le3; and tβˆ‰Zt\notin Z, since x0x_{0} is a lower bound for ZZ and t<x0t<x_{0}. Hence cos⁑tβ‰ 0\cos t\ne0. If cos⁑t<0\cos t<0, Claim 2 gives cc with 0≀c≀t≀30\le c\le t\le3 and cos⁑c=0\cos c=0, so c∈Zc\in Z while c≀t<x0c\le t<x_{0}, contradicting that x0x_{0} is a lower bound for ZZ. Being neither zero nor negative, cos⁑t\cos t is positive.

(d) Uniqueness. Let y∈Ry\in\mathbb{R} satisfy 0<y0<y, cos⁑y=0\cos y=0 and 0<cos⁑t0<\cos t for every tt with 0≀t<y0\le t<y. If y<x0y<x_{0} then 0≀y<x00\le y<x_{0}, so 0<cos⁑y0<\cos y by (c), contradicting cos⁑y=0\cos y=0. If x0<yx_{0}<y then 0≀x0<y0\le x_{0}<y, so 0<cos⁑x00<\cos x_{0} by the assumed property of yy, contradicting (a). Neither is less than the other, so y=x0y=x_{0}.

Together with x0≀3x_{0}\le3 this proves clause 1.

Claim 5 (clause 2). Let tt satisfy 0<t≀x00<t\le x_{0}. By Claim 1 on [0,t][0,t] there is cc with 0<c<t0<c<t and sin⁑t=sin⁑tβˆ’sin⁑0=cos⁑(c)(tβˆ’0)=cos⁑(c) t\sin t=\sin t-\sin0=\cos(c)(t-0)=\cos(c)\,t. Here 0≀c0\le c and c<t≀x0c<t\le x_{0}, so 0<cos⁑c0<\cos c by clause 1; with 0<t0<t, claim 5 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives 0<sin⁑t0<\sin t.

In particular 0<sin⁑x00<\sin x_{0}. By The Pythagorean Identity for Sine and Cosine (i),

(cos⁑x0)2+(sin⁑x0)2=1,(\cos x_{0})^{2}+(\sin x_{0})^{2}=1,

and (cos⁑x0)2=0β‹…0=0(\cos x_{0})^{2}=0\cdot0=0 by (a) of Claim 4 and claim 1 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field; hence (sin⁑x0)2=1=1β‹…1=12(\sin x_{0})^{2}=1=1\cdot1=1^{2}. Since 0<sin⁑x00<\sin x_{0} gives 0≀sin⁑x00\le\sin x_{0}, and 0≀10\le1 by claim 1 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, claim 3 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field gives sin⁑x0=1\sin x_{0}=1. This proves clause 2 and completes the proof.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…