TheoremBase

Equip V with the equivalent inner product <x,y>_V + 2 alpha <x,y>_H, apply Riesz to y -> 2 alpha <x-bar, y>_H, and expand Phi around the representing vector; contraction by subtracting two Euler-Lagrange identities and testing against the difference; approximation by density plus contraction; density in V via weak compactness, Radon-Riesz and the subsequence criterion.

Proof

We use the identities of Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space, The Cauchy–Schwarz Inequality in a Real Inner Product Space, The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity, the triple facts Elementary Properties of a Hilbert Triple: the Embedding, the Riesz Map and the Form Operator, and for real numbers Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field and Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field. Condition (a) of the triple is ∣x∣H≤∣x∣V|x|_{H}\le|x|_{V} on VV and condition (b) is the density of VV in HH. Throughout, α>0\alpha>0 is fixed and xˉ∈H\bar{x}\in H; the constructions are repeated verbatim for any positive real in place of α\alpha.

An equivalent inner product on VV. For x,y∈Vx,y\in V put [x,y]=⟨x,y⟩V+2α⟨x,y⟩H[x,y]=\langle x,y\rangle_{V}+2\alpha\langle x,y\rangle_{H}. This is symmetric, additive and homogeneous in the first argument as a sum of two such maps, and [x,x]=∣x∣V2+2α∣x∣H2≥∣x∣V2≥0[x,x]=|x|_{V}^{2}+2\alpha|x|_{H}^{2}\ge|x|_{V}^{2}\ge 0 with [x,x]=0[x,x]=0 only if x=0Hx=0_{H}; so [⋅,⋅][\cdot,\cdot] is an inner product on VV. Write ∥x∥∗\lVert x\rVert_{\ast} for the associated norm; then ∣x∣V≤∥x∥∗|x|_{V}\le\lVert x\rVert_{\ast} and, since ∣x∣H≤∣x∣V|x|_{H}\le|x|_{V} gives ∣x∣H2≤∣x∣V2|x|_{H}^{2}\le|x|_{V}^{2} (claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field), hence 2α∣x∣H2≤2α∣x∣V22\alpha|x|_{H}^{2}\le 2\alpha|x|_{V}^{2} (claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field) and, adding ∣x∣V2|x|_{V}^{2} to both sides (order axiom of Ordered Field), ∥x∥∗2≤(1+2α)∣x∣V2\lVert x\rVert_{\ast}^{2}\le(1+2\alpha)|x|_{V}^{2}. Consequently (V,[⋅,⋅])(V,[\cdot,\cdot]) is a real Hilbert space: a Cauchy sequence for ∥⋅∥∗\lVert\cdot\rVert_{\ast} is Cauchy for ∣⋅∣V|\cdot|_{V}, hence converges in (V,dV)(V,d_{V}) to some xx, and ∥xm−x∥∗2≤(1+2α)∣xm−x∣V2\lVert x_{m}-x\rVert_{\ast}^{2}\le(1+2\alpha)|x_{m}-x|_{V}^{2} shows that it converges to xx for ∥⋅∥∗\lVert\cdot\rVert_{\ast} as well (choose NN with ∣xm−x∣V2<ε2/(1+2α)|x_{m}-x|_{V}^{2}<\varepsilon^{2}/(1+2\alpha) for m≥Nm\ge N).

The representing vector. The map ℓ(y)=2α⟨xˉ,y⟩H\ell(y)=2\alpha\langle\bar{x},y\rangle_{H} on VV is linear (Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space (i)) and ∣ℓ(y)∣≤2α∣xˉ∣H∣y∣H≤2α∣xˉ∣H∥y∥∗|\ell(y)|\le 2\alpha|\bar{x}|_{H}|y|_{H}\le 2\alpha|\bar{x}|_{H}\lVert y\rVert_{\ast} by Cauchy-Schwarz, ∣y∣H≤∣y∣V≤∥y∥∗|y|_{H}\le|y|_{V}\le\lVert y\rVert_{\ast} and claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field; so ℓ\ell is a bounded linear functional on (V,[⋅,⋅])(V,[\cdot,\cdot]). By The Riesz Representation Theorem for a Real Hilbert Space (i) and The Riesz Representation Theorem for a Real Hilbert Space (ii) there is a unique x^∈V\hat{x}\in V with [y,x^]=ℓ(y)[y,\hat{x}]=\ell(y) for all y∈Vy\in V, that is, by symmetry and bilinearity,

⟨x^,y⟩V+2α⟨x^,y⟩H=2α⟨xˉ,y⟩H,equivalently⟨x^,y⟩V=⟨2α(xˉ−x^),y⟩H(y∈V).\langle\hat{x},y\rangle_{V}+2\alpha\langle\hat{x},y\rangle_{H}=2\alpha\langle\bar{x},y\rangle_{H},\qquad\text{equivalently}\qquad\langle\hat{x},y\rangle_{V}=\langle 2\alpha(\bar{x}-\hat{x}),y\rangle_{H}\qquad(y\in V).

We refer to this pair of identities as (E).

Claims 1 and 2. Let x∈Vx\in V and put w=x−x^∈Vw=x-\hat{x}\in V. By Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space (v) applied in VV and in HH,

Φxˉ(x)−Φxˉ(x^)=⟨x^,w⟩V+12∣w∣V2+2α⟨x^−xˉ,w⟩H+α∣w∣H2=12∣w∣V2+α∣w∣H2,\Phi_{\bar{x}}(x)-\Phi_{\bar{x}}(\hat{x})=\langle\hat{x},w\rangle_{V}+\tfrac12|w|_{V}^{2}+2\alpha\langle\hat{x}-\bar{x},w\rangle_{H}+\alpha|w|_{H}^{2}=\tfrac12|w|_{V}^{2}+\alpha|w|_{H}^{2},

the first two inner-product terms cancelling by (E) with y=wy=w (note ⟨x^−xˉ,w⟩H=−⟨xˉ−x^,w⟩H\langle\hat{x}-\bar{x},w\rangle_{H}=-\langle\bar{x}-\hat{x},w\rangle_{H}). The right side is nonnegative and vanishes only if ∣w∣V=0|w|_{V}=0, that is, x=x^x=\hat{x}. Hence x^\hat{x} satisfies Φxˉ(x^)≤Φxˉ(x)\Phi_{\bar{x}}(\hat{x})\le\Phi_{\bar{x}}(x) for all x∈Vx\in V, and any xx with this property has Φxˉ(x)−Φxˉ(x^)≤0\Phi_{\bar{x}}(x)-\Phi_{\bar{x}}(\hat{x})\le 0, forcing x=x^x=\hat{x}: this proves claim 1 with Rαxˉ=x^R_{\alpha}\bar{x}=\hat{x}. By (E) and Hilbert Triple: a Densely and Continuously Embedded Hilbert Space and Its Form Operator (iv), x^∈D(A)\hat{x}\in D(A) with Ax^=2α(xˉ−x^)A\hat{x}=2\alpha(\bar{x}-\hat{x}). Conversely, if x∈D(A)x\in D(A) and Ax+2αx=2αxˉAx+2\alpha x=2\alpha\bar{x}, then ⟨x,y⟩V=⟨Ax,y⟩H=⟨2α(xˉ−x),y⟩H\langle x,y\rangle_{V}=\langle Ax,y\rangle_{H}=\langle 2\alpha(\bar{x}-x),y\rangle_{H} for all y∈Vy\in V, so xx satisfies the identity characterising x^\hat{x} and x=x^x=\hat{x} by the uniqueness of the representing vector. This proves claim 2.

Claim 3. Φxˉ(x^)≤Φxˉ(0H)=α∣xˉ∣H2\Phi_{\bar{x}}(\hat{x})\le\Phi_{\bar{x}}(0_{H})=\alpha|\bar{x}|_{H}^{2}, using ∣0H∣V=0|0_{H}|_{V}=0 and ∣0H−xˉ∣H=∣xˉ∣H|0_{H}-\bar{x}|_{H}=|\bar{x}|_{H} (Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space (ii), Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space (iv)). If xˉ∈V\bar{x}\in V, then Φxˉ(x^)≤Φxˉ(xˉ)=12∣xˉ∣V2\Phi_{\bar{x}}(\hat{x})\le\Phi_{\bar{x}}(\bar{x})=\tfrac12|\bar{x}|_{V}^{2}; dropping the nonnegative term α∣x^−xˉ∣H2\alpha|\hat{x}-\bar{x}|_{H}^{2} gives ∣x^∣V2≤∣xˉ∣V2|\hat{x}|_{V}^{2}\le|\bar{x}|_{V}^{2}, hence ∣x^∣V≤∣xˉ∣V|\hat{x}|_{V}\le|\bar{x}|_{V} (claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field), and dropping 12∣x^∣V2\tfrac12|\hat{x}|_{V}^{2} and multiplying by α−1>0\alpha^{-1}>0 gives ∣x^−xˉ∣H2≤∣xˉ∣V2/(2α)|\hat{x}-\bar{x}|_{H}^{2}\le|\bar{x}|_{V}^{2}/(2\alpha).

Claim 4. Let y^=Rαyˉ\hat{y}=R_{\alpha}\bar{y}. Subtracting the identities (E) for xˉ\bar{x} and for yˉ\bar{y} and using bilinearity, ⟨x^−y^,z⟩V=2α⟨(xˉ−yˉ)−(x^−y^),z⟩H\langle\hat{x}-\hat{y},z\rangle_{V}=2\alpha\langle(\bar{x}-\bar{y})-(\hat{x}-\hat{y}),z\rangle_{H} for all z∈Vz\in V. With z=x^−y^z=\hat{x}-\hat{y} this gives ∣x^−y^∣V2+2α∣x^−y^∣H2=2α⟨xˉ−yˉ,x^−y^⟩H≤2α∣xˉ−yˉ∣H∣x^−y^∣H|\hat{x}-\hat{y}|_{V}^{2}+2\alpha|\hat{x}-\hat{y}|_{H}^{2}=2\alpha\langle\bar{x}-\bar{y},\hat{x}-\hat{y}\rangle_{H}\le 2\alpha|\bar{x}-\bar{y}|_{H}|\hat{x}-\hat{y}|_{H} by claim 3 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field and Cauchy-Schwarz. Dropping ∣x^−y^∣V2≥0|\hat{x}-\hat{y}|_{V}^{2}\ge 0 and dividing by 2α>02\alpha>0: ∣x^−y^∣H2≤∣xˉ−yˉ∣H∣x^−y^∣H|\hat{x}-\hat{y}|_{H}^{2}\le|\bar{x}-\bar{y}|_{H}|\hat{x}-\hat{y}|_{H}. If ∣x^−y^∣H=0|\hat{x}-\hat{y}|_{H}=0 the claim is trivial; otherwise divide by it (claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field with the multiplier ∣x^−y^∣H−1|\hat{x}-\hat{y}|_{H}^{-1}).

Claim 5. Let ε>0\varepsilon>0. By condition (b) and Sequential Characterization of the Closure in a Metric Space there is v∈Vv\in V with ∣v−xˉ∣H<ε/3|v-\bar{x}|_{H}<\varepsilon/3. By claim 3 of The Archimedean Property of the Real Numbers choose α0>0\alpha_{0}>0 with ∣v∣V2/(2α0)<(ε/3)2|v|_{V}^{2}/(2\alpha_{0})<(\varepsilon/3)^{2} (if ∣v∣V=0|v|_{V}=0 any α0>0\alpha_{0}>0 serves). For real β≥α0\beta\ge\alpha_{0} we have (2β)−1≤(2α0)−1(2\beta)^{-1}\le(2\alpha_{0})^{-1}: both inverses are positive (claims 5 and 7 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field) and multiplying 2α0≤2β2\alpha_{0}\le 2\beta by the nonnegative number (2β)−1(2α0)−1(2\beta)^{-1}(2\alpha_{0})^{-1} (claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field) gives it. Hence claim 3 for β\beta gives ∣Rβv−v∣H2≤∣v∣V2/(2β)≤∣v∣V2/(2α0)<(ε/3)2|R_{\beta}v-v|_{H}^{2}\le|v|_{V}^{2}/(2\beta)\le|v|_{V}^{2}/(2\alpha_{0})<(\varepsilon/3)^{2}, so ∣Rβv−v∣H<ε/3|R_{\beta}v-v|_{H}<\varepsilon/3 by claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field; and claim 4 for β\beta gives ∣Rβxˉ−Rβv∣H≤∣xˉ−v∣H<ε/3|R_{\beta}\bar{x}-R_{\beta}v|_{H}\le|\bar{x}-v|_{H}<\varepsilon/3. By The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity (i), ∣Rβxˉ−xˉ∣H≤∣Rβxˉ−Rβv∣H+∣Rβv−v∣H+∣v−xˉ∣H<ε|R_{\beta}\bar{x}-\bar{x}|_{H}\le|R_{\beta}\bar{x}-R_{\beta}v|_{H}+|R_{\beta}v-v|_{H}+|v-\bar{x}|_{H}<\varepsilon.

Claim 6. Let xˉ∈H\bar{x}\in H and put zk=Rkxˉ∈D(A)z_{k}=R_{k}\bar{x}\in D(A) for k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} (claim 2). Given ε>0\varepsilon>0, take α0\alpha_{0} from claim 5 and, by claim 1 of The Archimedean Property of the Real Numbers, N∈NN\in\mathbb{N} with α0<N\alpha_{0}<N (read in R\mathbb{R}); for k≥Nk\ge N we have k≥α0k\ge\alpha_{0} in R\mathbb{R} (claim 6 of Properties of the Canonical Map from the Natural Numbers to an Ordered Field when k≠Nk\ne N), so ∣zk−xˉ∣H<ε|z_{k}-\bar{x}|_{H}<\varepsilon. Thus (zk)(z_{k}) converges to xˉ\bar{x} in HH, and xˉ\bar{x} lies in the closure of D(A)D(A) by Sequential Characterization of the Closure in a Metric Space. Hence the closure of D(A)D(A) is HH, which is density.

Claim 7. Let xˉ∈V\bar{x}\in V and zk=Rkxˉz_{k}=R_{k}\bar{x}. By claim 3 (for β=k\beta=k), ∣zk∣V≤∣xˉ∣V|z_{k}|_{V}\le|\bar{x}|_{V} for all kk, and by the argument of claim 6, (zk)(z_{k}) converges to xˉ\bar{x} in HH. We apply the subsequence criterion The Subsequence Criterion for Convergence in a Metric Space (ii) in (V,dV)(V,d_{V}). Let (zkj)j(z_{k_{j}})_{j} be a subsequence. Since (V,dV)(V,d_{V}) is separable by hypothesis and VV is a real Hilbert space, Bounded Sequences in a Separable Real Hilbert Space Have Weakly Convergent Subsequences applied in VV yields a further subsequence (ui)i=(zkji)i(u_{i})_{i}=(z_{k_{j_{i}}})_{i} and w∈Vw\in V with ui⇀wu_{i}\rightharpoonup w in VV. By Elementary Properties of a Hilbert Triple: the Embedding, the Riesz Map and the Form Operator (ii), ui⇀wu_{i}\rightharpoonup w in HH; but (ui)(u_{i}) also converges to xˉ\bar{x} in HH (A Subsequence of a Convergent Sequence Has the Same Limit, twice), hence weakly in HH (Elementary Properties of Weak Convergence in a Real Inner Product Space (ii)), so w=xˉw=\bar{x} by Elementary Properties of Weak Convergence in a Real Inner Product Space (i). Next, the real sequence (∣ui∣V)i(|u_{i}|_{V})_{i} converges to ∣xˉ∣V|\bar{x}|_{V}: otherwise there is ε>0\varepsilon>0 such that ∣∣ui∣V−∣xˉ∣V∣≥ε\bigl||u_{i}|_{V}-|\bar{x}|_{V}\bigr|\ge\varepsilon for infinitely many ii; since ∣ui∣V≤∣xˉ∣V|u_{i}|_{V}\le|\bar{x}|_{V}, the number t=∣ui∣V−∣xˉ∣Vt=|u_{i}|_{V}-|\bar{x}|_{V} satisfies t≤0t\le 0, so ∣t∣=−t|t|=-t (claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field: ∣t∣|t| is tt or −t-t, and t≤0≤−tt\le 0\le -t by claim 4 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field), and ε≤∣t∣=−t\varepsilon\le|t|=-t gives ∣ui∣V≤∣xˉ∣V−ε|u_{i}|_{V}\le|\bar{x}|_{V}-\varepsilon by sign reversal and translation (claim 4 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field); thus these ii satisfy ∣ui∣V≤∣xˉ∣V−ε|u_{i}|_{V}\le|\bar{x}|_{V}-\varepsilon, and they form a strictly increasing sequence of indices (take the least such index above each previous one, by The Natural Numbers Are Well Ordered), giving a subsequence of (ui)(u_{i}) that still converges weakly to xˉ\bar{x} in VV (Elementary Properties of Weak Convergence in a Real Inner Product Space (iv)) while being bounded by ∣xˉ∣V−ε|\bar{x}|_{V}-\varepsilon, so that Elementary Properties of Weak Convergence in a Real Inner Product Space (v) gives ∣xˉ∣V≤∣xˉ∣V−ε|\bar{x}|_{V}\le|\bar{x}|_{V}-\varepsilon, a contradiction. By Elementary Properties of Weak Convergence in a Real Inner Product Space (vi) in VV, (ui)(u_{i}) converges to xˉ\bar{x} in (V,dV)(V,d_{V}). Thus every subsequence of (zk)(z_{k}) has a further subsequence converging to xˉ\bar{x} in VV, and the criterion gives that (zk)(z_{k}) converges to xˉ\bar{x} in (V,dV)(V,d_{V}). Since zk∈D(A)z_{k}\in D(A), Sequential Characterization of the Closure in a Metric Space in VV shows that every xˉ∈V\bar{x}\in V lies in the closure of D(A)D(A) in (V,dV)(V,d_{V}); so D(A)D(A) is dense in VV.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…