TheoremBase

Direct computation from the inner product axioms and the elementary vector space identities; the norm identities use uniqueness of the nonnegative square root.

Proof

Throughout, (a), (b), (c), (d) refer to the conditions of Real Inner Product Spaces (i), and ∣x∣|x| is the unique real number rr with 0≀r0\le r and r2=⟨x,x⟩r^{2}=\langle x,x\rangle provided by Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root as in Real Inner Product Spaces (ii). We use freely the field axioms of R\mathbb{R} and the vector space axioms of Vector Space over a Field.

Claim 1. By (a), (b) and (a) again, ⟨x,y+z⟩=⟨y+z,x⟩=⟨y,x⟩+⟨z,x⟩=⟨x,y⟩+⟨x,z⟩\langle x,y+z\rangle=\langle y+z,x\rangle=\langle y,x\rangle+\langle z,x\rangle=\langle x,y\rangle+\langle x,z\rangle; by (a), (c) and (a), ⟨x,Ξ»y⟩=⟨λy,x⟩=λ⟨y,x⟩=λ⟨x,y⟩\langle x,\lambda y\rangle=\langle\lambda y,x\rangle=\lambda\langle y,x\rangle=\lambda\langle x,y\rangle. By claim 5 of Elementary Identities in a Vector Space, βˆ’x=(βˆ’1)x-x=(-1)x, so by (c), βŸ¨βˆ’x,y⟩=(βˆ’1)⟨x,y⟩=βˆ’βŸ¨x,y⟩\langle -x,y\rangle=(-1)\langle x,y\rangle=-\langle x,y\rangle, and by symmetry (a) also ⟨x,βˆ’y⟩=βˆ’βŸ¨x,y⟩\langle x,-y\rangle=-\langle x,y\rangle. Finally ⟨xβˆ’y,z⟩=⟨x+(βˆ’y),z⟩=⟨x,z⟩+βŸ¨βˆ’y,z⟩=⟨x,zβŸ©βˆ’βŸ¨y,z⟩\langle x-y,z\rangle=\langle x+(-y),z\rangle=\langle x,z\rangle+\langle -y,z\rangle=\langle x,z\rangle-\langle y,z\rangle by (b) and what was just shown, and likewise ⟨x,yβˆ’z⟩=⟨x,yβŸ©βˆ’βŸ¨x,z⟩\langle x,y-z\rangle=\langle x,y\rangle-\langle x,z\rangle by the additivity in the second argument just proved.

Claim 2. By claim 3 of Elementary Identities in a Vector Space, 0E=0 x0_{E}=0\,x, so by (c), ⟨0E,x⟩=⟨0 x,x⟩=0β€‰βŸ¨x,x⟩=0\langle 0_{E},x\rangle=\langle 0\,x,x\rangle=0\,\langle x,x\rangle=0, and ⟨x,0E⟩=0\langle x,0_{E}\rangle=0 by (a). In particular ⟨0E,0E⟩=0=02\langle 0_{E},0_{E}\rangle=0=0^{2} with 0≀00\le 0, so ∣0E∣=0|0_{E}|=0 by the uniqueness in Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root.

Claim 3. If ∣x∣=0|x|=0 then ⟨x,x⟩=∣x∣2=0\langle x,x\rangle=|x|^{2}=0, so x=0Ex=0_{E} by (d). Conversely ∣0E∣=0|0_{E}|=0 by claim 2. If xβ‰ 0Ex\ne 0_{E}, then ∣xβˆ£β‰ 0|x|\ne 0 by what was just shown, while 0β‰€βˆ£x∣0\le|x|; hence 0<∣x∣0<|x| by the definition of the strict order.

Claim 4. By (c) and claim 1, ⟨λx,Ξ»x⟩=λ⟨x,Ξ»x⟩=Ξ»2⟨x,x⟩\langle\lambda x,\lambda x\rangle=\lambda\langle x,\lambda x\rangle=\lambda^{2}\langle x,x\rangle. By claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, ∣λ∣|\lambda| equals Ξ»\lambda or βˆ’Ξ»-\lambda, and (βˆ’Ξ»)2=Ξ»2(-\lambda)^{2}=\lambda^{2} in the field R\mathbb{R}, so ∣λ∣2=Ξ»2|\lambda|^{2}=\lambda^{2}. Hence (βˆ£Ξ»βˆ£β€‰βˆ£x∣)2=∣λ∣2∣x∣2=Ξ»2⟨x,x⟩=⟨λx,Ξ»x⟩=∣λx∣2(|\lambda|\,|x|)^{2}=|\lambda|^{2}|x|^{2}=\lambda^{2}\langle x,x\rangle=\langle\lambda x,\lambda x\rangle=|\lambda x|^{2}. Both ∣λx∣|\lambda x| and βˆ£Ξ»βˆ£β€‰βˆ£x∣|\lambda|\,|x| are nonnegative: the first by Real Inner Product Spaces (ii), the second because 0β‰€βˆ£Ξ»βˆ£0\le|\lambda| (claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field) and 0β‰€βˆ£x∣0\le|x|, so that 0=βˆ£Ξ»βˆ£β‹…0β‰€βˆ£Ξ»βˆ£β€‰βˆ£x∣0=|\lambda|\cdot 0\le|\lambda|\,|x| by claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. Hence they are equal by claim 3 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field. For the last assertion, βˆ’x=(βˆ’1)x-x=(-1)x, and βˆ£βˆ’1∣=∣1∣|-1|=|1| by claim 2 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field while ∣1∣=1|1|=1 by Absolute Value in an Ordered Field since 0≀10\le 1 (claim 1 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field); so βˆ£βˆ’x∣=βˆ£βˆ’1βˆ£β€‰βˆ£x∣=∣x∣|-x|=|-1|\,|x|=|x|.

Claim 5. By (b) and claim 1,

∣x+y∣2=⟨x+y,x+y⟩=⟨x,x+y⟩+⟨y,x+y⟩=⟨x,x⟩+⟨x,y⟩+⟨y,x⟩+⟨y,y⟩=∣x∣2+2⟨x,y⟩+∣y∣2,|x+y|^{2}=\langle x+y,x+y\rangle=\langle x,x+y\rangle+\langle y,x+y\rangle=\langle x,x\rangle+\langle x,y\rangle+\langle y,x\rangle+\langle y,y\rangle=|x|^{2}+2\langle x,y\rangle+|y|^{2},

using (a) for ⟨y,x⟩=⟨x,y⟩\langle y,x\rangle=\langle x,y\rangle. Applying this with βˆ’y-y in place of yy, and using ⟨x,βˆ’y⟩=βˆ’βŸ¨x,y⟩\langle x,-y\rangle=-\langle x,y\rangle (claim 1) and βˆ£βˆ’y∣=∣y∣|-y|=|y| (claim 4), gives ∣xβˆ’y∣2=∣x∣2βˆ’2⟨x,y⟩+∣y∣2|x-y|^{2}=|x|^{2}-2\langle x,y\rangle+|y|^{2}.

Claim 6. Add the two identities of claim 5.

Claim 7. Subtract the second identity of claim 5 from the first: ∣x+y∣2βˆ’βˆ£xβˆ’y∣2=4⟨x,y⟩|x+y|^{2}-|x-y|^{2}=4\langle x,y\rangle.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…