TheoremBase

Proof of The Hamilton-Jacobi Operator with Common Noise and Penalty Drift is Degenerate Elliptic

lemmalem:hamilton-jacobi-penalty-drift-elliptic-wasserstein-2026c
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 2,285 chars · 7 deps · depth 41 Reason: N1b: ellipticity proof carried forward, trace monotonicity for Gamma^T Gamma.

The trace is monotone for the semidefinite order and the common-noise intensity is nonnegative, so the only term depending on the matrix argument is nonincreasing in it.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.

Let (ν,q)∈V(DΣ)(\nu,q)\in\mathcal{V}(\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}), let r∈Rr\in\mathbb{R} and let X,Y∈S(d)X,Y\in\mathcal{S}(d) satisfy X⪯YX\preceq Y. Apply The Trace as a Sum of Quadratic Forms, its Monotonicity and a Norm Bound §monotone with its matrix AA taken to be Γ\Gamma; the letters mm and pp of that lemma are its own dimensions, and here its mm is read as our pp (the number of rows of Γ\Gamma) and its pp as our dd, so that its S(p)\mathcal{S}(p) is our S(d)\mathcal{S}(d) and its A⊤AXA^{\top}AX is our Γ⊤ΓX\Gamma^{\top}\Gamma X (its hypotheses 1≤m1\le m and 1≤p1\le p hold because the matrix sets of Real Matrices, Symmetric Matrices and the Semidefinite Ordering: Standing Notation §matrices, to which Γ\Gamma belongs, are formed only for dimensions at least 11). It gives

tr(Γ⊤ΓX)≤tr(Γ⊤ΓY).\mathrm{tr}\bigl(\Gamma^{\top}\Gamma X\bigr)\le\mathrm{tr}\bigl(\Gamma^{\top}\Gamma Y\bigr).

The multiplier 12\tfrac{1}{2}, the product of 11 with the multiplicative inverse of 22, equals that inverse and is positive: 0<20<2 and the inverse exists by claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, and the inverse is positive by claim 7 of that lemma. In particular 0≤120\le\tfrac{1}{2}, the strict order << entailing ≤\le by its definition there. Hence claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, applied to the displayed inequality with 12\tfrac{1}{2} as the nonnegative multiplier, gives

12 tr(Γ⊤ΓX)≤12 tr(Γ⊤ΓY),\frac{1}{2}\,\mathrm{tr}\bigl(\Gamma^{\top}\Gamma X\bigr)\le\frac{1}{2}\,\mathrm{tr}\bigl(\Gamma^{\top}\Gamma Y\bigr),

and the sign reversal of claim 4 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives

−12 tr(Γ⊤ΓY)≤−12 tr(Γ⊤ΓX).-\frac{1}{2}\,\mathrm{tr}\bigl(\Gamma^{\top}\Gamma Y\bigr)\le-\frac{1}{2}\,\mathrm{tr}\bigl(\Gamma^{\top}\Gamma X\bigr).

Adding to both sides the real number λ0 r+θ2∥q∥ν2+⟨Σ(ν),q⟩ν−g(ν)\lambda_{0}\,r+\tfrac{\theta}{2}\lVert q\rVert_{\nu}^{2}+\langle\Sigma(\nu),q\rangle_{\nu}-g(\nu), which does not depend on the matrix argument — the compatibility of the order with addition, an axiom of Ordered Field — and reading off the value of the operator from The Discounted Hamilton-Jacobi Equation with Common Noise and a Penalty Drift on the Wasserstein Space §operator gives

F(ν,r,q,Y)≤F(ν,r,q,X).F(\nu,r,q,Y)\le F(\nu,r,q,X).

Since (ν,q)(\nu,q), rr, XX and YY were arbitrary, FF is degenerate elliptic by Degenerate Elliptic Second-Order Equation Operators on the Wasserstein Space §elliptic.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Comments

Loading…