Reason: Proof of lem:chain-rule-1d-2026a by the increment (Caratheodory) function of g at gamma(t_0), which makes the factorization of the difference quotient valid with no case split on whether gamma attains gamma(t_0) nearby. Exposure-clean.
Proof
Throughout, β£β β£ is the absolute value on R. Write s0β=Ξ³(t0β), A=gβ²(s0β) and B=Ξ³β²(t0β), the derivatives supplied by the hypotheses.
Step 0 (two elementary facts).
(a)If 0β€c and pβ€q then cpβ€cq. If c=0 both products are 0; if 0<c and p=q they are equal; and if 0<c and p<q then cp<cq by claim 10 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field.
(b)For every xβR one has 0<β£xβ£+1, the inverse (β£xβ£+1)β1 exists and is positive, and β£xβ£(β£xβ£+1)β1β€1. By claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, 0β€β£xβ£, and 0<1 by claim 6 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field; claim 3 of that lemma, applied to the strict inequality 0<1 and the inequality 0β€β£xβ£, gives 0<1+β£xβ£=β£xβ£+1, so claim 7 supplies the positive inverse. Claim 1 of that lemma turns 0<1 into β£xβ£<β£xβ£+1, and fact (a) with c=(β£xβ£+1)β1 gives β£xβ£(β£xβ£+1)β1β€(β£xβ£+1)(β£xβ£+1)β1=1.
Step 1 (the increment function of g). Define Ξ¦:JβR by
the inverse existing because sξ =s0β gives sβs0βξ =0.
(1a)For every sβJ, g(s)βg(s0β)=Ξ¦(s)(sβs0β). For sξ =s0β this is field arithmetic, using (sβs0β)β1(sβs0β)=1; for s=s0β both sides are 0.
(1b)For every Ξ΅βR with 0<Ξ΅ there is Ξ·βR with 0<Ξ· such that every sβJ with β£sβs0ββ£<Ξ· satisfies β£Ξ¦(s)βAβ£<Ξ΅. By hypothesis s0β is an interior point of J at which g is differentiable with derivative A, so the definition of the derivative supplies Ξ· with 0<Ξ· such that every kβR with 0<β£kβ£<Ξ· and s0β+kβJ satisfies
β(g(s0β+k)βg(s0β))kβ1βAβ<Ξ΅.
Let sβJ with β£sβs0ββ£<Ξ·. If s=s0β then Ξ¦(s)βA=AβA=0, and β£0β£=0<Ξ΅ by claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field. Otherwise sβs0βξ =0, hence 0<β£sβs0ββ£ by claim 1 of that lemma; taking k=sβs0β, for which s0β+k=sβJ, the displayed estimate is exactly β£Ξ¦(s)βAβ£<Ξ΅.
Step 2 (a bound on the difference quotients of Ξ³). For hβR with hξ =0 and t0β+hβI set
Step 3 (the estimate). Let Ξ΅βR with 0<Ξ΅. By claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, 0<Ξ΅β 2β1 and Ξ΅β 2β1+Ξ΅β 2β1=Ξ΅. By Step 0 (b) the inverses (β£Bβ£+1)β1 and (β£Aβ£+1)β1 exist and are positive, so by claim 5 of that lemma the numbers
Let Ξ· be as in Step 1 (1b) for Ξ΅1β. Differentiability of Ξ³ at t0β supplies Ξ΄2β with 0<Ξ΄2β such that every h with 0<β£hβ£<Ξ΄2β and t0β+hβI satisfies β£Q(h)βBβ£<Ξ΅2β. The number Ξ·(β£Bβ£+1)β1 is positive by claim 5. Applying claim 9 twice, let Ξ΄ be a least element among Ξ΄1β, Ξ΄2β and Ξ·(β£Bβ£+1)β1; since Ξ΄ equals one of them, 0<Ξ΄.
Let hβR with 0<β£hβ£<Ξ΄ and t0β+hβI, and put s=Ξ³(t0β+h), an element of J by hypothesis. By claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field we have β£hβ£<Ξ΄1β, β£hβ£<Ξ΄2β and β£hβ£<Ξ·(β£Bβ£+1)β1.
First, sβs0β=hQ(h), so β£sβs0ββ£=β£hβ£β£Q(h)β£ by claim 4 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field. Since hξ =0, claim 1 of that lemma gives 0<β£hβ£; so Step 2 and claim 10 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field give β£hβ£β£Q(h)β£<β£hβ£(β£Bβ£+1), and claim 10 again, with the positive multiplier β£Bβ£+1, gives β£hβ£(β£Bβ£+1)<Ξ·(β£Bβ£+1)β1(β£Bβ£+1)=Ξ·. By claim 2 we conclude β£sβs0ββ£<Ξ·, so Step 1 (1b) yields
β£Ξ¦(s)βAβ£<Ξ΅1β.
Second, by Step 1 (1a), the identity sβs0β=hQ(h) and hβ1h=1,
For the first summand, Step 0 (a) with c=β£Ξ¦(s)βAβ£, which is nonnegative by claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, together with β£Q(h)β£β€β£Bβ£+1 from Step 2, gives β£Ξ¦(s)βAβ£β£Q(h)β£β€β£Ξ¦(s)βAβ£(β£Bβ£+1); and claim 10 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, with the positive multiplier β£Bβ£+1, turns β£Ξ¦(s)βAβ£<Ξ΅1β into β£Ξ¦(s)βAβ£(β£Bβ£+1)<Ξ΅1β(β£Bβ£+1)=Ξ΅β 2β1. By claim 2 the first summand is smaller than Ξ΅β 2β1. For the second summand, Step 0 (a) with c=β£Aβ£ gives β£Aβ£β£Q(h)βBβ£β€β£Aβ£Ξ΅2β=(β£Aβ£(β£Aβ£+1)β1)Ξ΅β 2β1, and Step 0 (b) with Step 0 (a) applied with c=Ξ΅β 2β1 bounds this by Ξ΅β 2β1.
Since Ξ΅ was an arbitrary positive real number and t0β is an interior point of I, the real number AB witnesses the definition of the derivative of gβΞ³ at t0β. Hence gβΞ³ is differentiable at t0β and (gβΞ³)β²(t0β)=AB=gβ²(Ξ³(t0β))Ξ³β²(t0β). β