TheoremBase

The algebra identities are checked pointwise by regrouping sums over factorisations of words; linearity, traciality and adjoints follow from the product formula for evaluations; positivity is the quadratic form of the kernel of the law; Cauchy-Schwarz comes from positivity at X+zY; and the l1 bounds follow from the triangle inequality and the bound one.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.

Throughout, X,Y,ZX,Y,Z have support sets F,G,HF,G,H (Word Polynomials in Unitary Letters: the Normed *-Algebra of Finitely Supported Word Functions §polynomials). For A⊆W2dA\subseteq W_{2d} we write A∗={u∗:u∈A}A^{*}=\{u^{*}:u\in A\}. As in Word Polynomials in Unitary Letters: the Normed *-Algebra of Finitely Supported Word Functions §product, S={uv:(u,v)∈F×G}S=\{uv:(u,v)\in F\times G\} is the support set of XYXY and Pw={(u,v)∈F×G:uv=w}P_{w}=\{(u,v)\in F\times G:uv=w\}. Finite sums are those of Sum over a Finite Index Set over the field C\mathbb{C} or R\mathbb{R}; reindexing, additivity and homogeneity refer to claims 2, 3 and 4 of Properties of a Sum over a Finite Index Set. Products, evaluations and ℓ1\ell^{1} norms do not depend on the support sets used (Word Polynomials in Unitary Letters: the Normed *-Algebra of Finitely Supported Word Functions §product, Evaluation of Word Polynomials by a Unitary Law §evaluation, Word Polynomials in Unitary Letters: the Normed *-Algebra of Finitely Supported Word Functions §norm); so whenever convenient we replace a support set by a larger nonempty finite set, for instance FF and GG by F∪GF\cup G, which is finite by Sums over Finite Index Sets: Finite Unions, Disjoint Unions, Vanishing Terms, Dependent Pairs, Conjugation and the Modulus §finite-union and outside which both XX and YY vanish.

Step 1 (adjoint words). (W1) (w∗)∗=w(w^{*})^{*}=w for every w∈W2dw\in W_{2d}, as shown in Word Polynomials in Unitary Letters: the Normed *-Algebra of Finitely Supported Word Functions §adjoint. Hence u↦u∗u\mapsto u^{*} is its own inverse, and for every A⊆W2dA\subseteq W_{2d} it restricts to a bijection of AA onto A∗A^{*}, with (A∗)∗=A(A^{*})^{*}=A.

(W2) (uv)∗=v∗u∗(uv)^{*}=v^{*}u^{*} for all u,v∈W2du,v\in W_{2d}. If u=∅u=\varnothing or v=∅v=\varnothing this follows from ∅∗=∅\varnothing^{*}=\varnothing (Words in Unitary Letters: Generators, Signs, Inverse Letters, Lengths and Adjoint Words §adjoint) and Basic Properties of Words: Associativity, Reversal, Finitely Many Factorisations, and Countability §monoid. Otherwise, for a word xx of length kk let x∨x^{\vee} be the word of length kk with (x∨)i=(xi)−1(x^{\vee})_{i}=(x_{i})^{-1} for i∈[k]i\in[k]; then x∗=(xrev)∨x^{*}=(x^{\mathrm{rev}})^{\vee} by Words in Unitary Letters: Generators, Signs, Inverse Letters, Lengths and Adjoint Words §adjoint. By Words over a Finite Alphabet: the Empty Word, Concatenation and Reversal §concatenation the letters of xyxy are those of xx followed by those of yy, so (xy)∨=x∨y∨(xy)^{\vee}=x^{\vee}y^{\vee}. By Basic Properties of Words: Associativity, Reversal, Finitely Many Factorisations, and Countability §reversal, (uv)rev=vrevurev(uv)^{\mathrm{rev}}=v^{\mathrm{rev}}u^{\mathrm{rev}}, and therefore (uv)∗=(vrevurev)∨=(vrev)∨(urev)∨=v∗u∗(uv)^{*}=(v^{\mathrm{rev}}u^{\mathrm{rev}})^{\vee}=(v^{\mathrm{rev}})^{\vee}(u^{\mathrm{rev}})^{\vee}=v^{*}u^{*}.

Step 2 (regrouping over factorisations). (P0) For every map ψ:F×G→C\psi:F\times G\to\mathbb{C} (or R\mathbb{R}),

∑w∈S ∑(u,v)∈Pwψ((u,v))=∑(u,v)∈F×Gψ((u,v)).\sum_{w\in S}\ \sum_{(u,v)\in P_{w}}\psi\bigl((u,v)\bigr)=\sum_{(u,v)\in F\times G}\psi\bigl((u,v)\bigr).

Indeed, SS is nonempty and finite, and each PwP_{w} with w∈Sw\in S is nonempty, since w=uvw=uv for some (u,v)∈F×G(u,v)\in F\times G. By Sums over Finite Index Sets: Finite Unions, Disjoint Unions, Vanishing Terms, Dependent Pairs, Conjugation and the Modulus §pairs the left side is the sum over the set TT of pairs (w,(u,v))(w,(u,v)) with w∈Sw\in S and (u,v)∈Pw(u,v)\in P_{w}. The map (w,(u,v))↦(u,v)(w,(u,v))\mapsto(u,v) is a bijection of TT onto F×GF\times G, since w=uvw=uv is determined by (u,v)(u,v) and (uv,(u,v))∈T(uv,(u,v))\in T for every (u,v)∈F×G(u,v)\in F\times G; reindexing gives (P0).

(E) For every map φ:W2d→C\varphi:W_{2d}\to\mathbb{C},

∑w∈S(XY)(w) φ(w)=∑(u,v)∈F×GX(u) Y(v) φ(uv).\sum_{w\in S}(XY)(w)\,\varphi(w)=\sum_{(u,v)\in F\times G}X(u)\,Y(v)\,\varphi(uv).

Indeed, for w∈Sw\in S homogeneity gives (XY)(w)φ(w)=∑(u,v)∈PwX(u)Y(v)φ(uv)(XY)(w)\varphi(w)=\sum_{(u,v)\in P_{w}}X(u)Y(v)\varphi(uv), since uv=wuv=w on PwP_{w}, and (P0) applies. With φ=λ\varphi=\lambda, Evaluation of Word Polynomials by a Unitary Law §evaluation and the support set SS of XYXY give

λ(XY)=∑(u,v)∈F×GX(u) Y(v) λ(uv).(Eλ)\lambda(XY)=\sum_{(u,v)\in F\times G}X(u)\,Y(v)\,\lambda(uv).\tag{E$_{\lambda}$}

Step 3 (clause 1, algebra). (a) Sums and scalars. Use the support set F∪GF\cup G for XX, YY and X+YX+Y, and HH for ZZ (Word Polynomials in Unitary Letters: the Normed *-Algebra of Finitely Supported Word Functions §polynomials). For w∈W2dw\in W_{2d} the set of pairs (u,v)∈(F∪G)×H(u,v)\in(F\cup G)\times H with uv=wuv=w is then the same for the products (X+Y)Z(X+Y)Z, XZXZ and YZYZ. If it is empty, all three values at ww are 00. Otherwise distributivity in C\mathbb{C} and additivity give ∑(X(u)+Y(u))Z(v)=∑X(u)Z(v)+∑Y(u)Z(v)\sum(X(u)+Y(u))Z(v)=\sum X(u)Z(v)+\sum Y(u)Z(v) over this set, that is, ((X+Y)Z)(w)=(XZ)(w)+(YZ)(w)((X+Y)Z)(w)=(XZ)(w)+(YZ)(w). The identities Z(X+Y)=ZX+ZYZ(X+Y)=ZX+ZY and (zX)Y=z(XY)=X(zY)(zX)Y=z(XY)=X(zY) follow in the same way, the latter by homogeneity. Pointwise, (X+Y)∗(w)=X(w∗)+Y(w∗)‾=X∗(w)+Y∗(w)(X+Y)^{*}(w)=\overline{X(w^{*})+Y(w^{*})}=X^{*}(w)+Y^{*}(w) and (zX)∗(w)=z X(w∗)‾=z‾ X∗(w)(zX)^{*}(w)=\overline{z\,X(w^{*})}=\overline{z}\,X^{*}(w), by claim 1 of Properties of Complex Conjugation and Modulus. Also (X∗)∗(w)=X∗(w∗)‾=X((w∗)∗)‾‾=X(w)(X^{*})^{*}(w)=\overline{X^{*}(w^{*})}=\overline{\overline{X((w^{*})^{*})}}=X(w) by (W1) and claim 1 of the same lemma.

(b) The words eue_{u}. With the support sets {u}\{u\} and {v}\{v\}, the set of pairs in {u}×{v}\{u\}\times\{v\} with product ww is {(u,v)}\{(u,v)\} if w=uvw=uv and empty otherwise. So (euev)(w)(e_{u}e_{v})(w) is 1⋅1=11\cdot1=1 if w=uvw=uv and 00 otherwise, which means euev=euve_{u}e_{v}=e_{uv}. Next, (eu)∗(w)=eu(w∗)‾(e_{u})^{*}(w)=\overline{e_{u}(w^{*})} is 11 if w∗=uw^{*}=u, that is, if w=u∗w=u^{*} by (W1), and 00 otherwise; so (eu)∗=eu∗(e_{u})^{*}=e_{u^{*}}. With the support sets {∅}\{\varnothing\} and FF, the pairs in {∅}×F\{\varnothing\}\times F with product ww form {(∅,w)}\{(\varnothing,w)\} if w∈Fw\in F and the empty set otherwise, because ∅v=v\varnothing v=v (Basic Properties of Words: Associativity, Reversal, Finitely Many Factorisations, and Countability §monoid). Hence (e∅X)(w)=X(w)(e_{\varnothing}X)(w)=X(w) for w∈Fw\in F, and (e∅X)(w)=0=X(w)(e_{\varnothing}X)(w)=0=X(w) for w∉Fw\notin F. In the same way, Xe∅=XXe_{\varnothing}=X.

(c) (XY)∗=Y∗X∗(XY)^{*}=Y^{*}X^{*}. Use the support sets G∗G^{*} and F∗F^{*} of Y∗Y^{*} and X∗X^{*} (Word Polynomials in Unitary Letters: the Normed *-Algebra of Finitely Supported Word Functions §adjoint). Let w∈W2dw\in W_{2d}, let Qw={(u,v)∈F×G:uv=w∗}Q_{w}=\{(u,v)\in F\times G:uv=w^{*}\}, and let Qw′={(v′,u′)∈G∗×F∗:v′u′=w}Q'_{w}=\{(v',u')\in G^{*}\times F^{*}:v'u'=w\}. The map (u,v)↦(v∗,u∗)(u,v)\mapsto(v^{*},u^{*}) is a bijection of QwQ_{w} onto Qw′Q'_{w}, with inverse (v′,u′)↦(u′∗,v′∗)(v',u')\mapsto(u'^{*},v'^{*}): by (W1) and (W2), uv=w∗uv=w^{*} holds if and only if w=(uv)∗=v∗u∗w=(uv)^{*}=v^{*}u^{*}. If QwQ_{w} is empty, so is Qw′Q'_{w}, and both (Y∗X∗)(w)(Y^{*}X^{*})(w) and (XY)∗(w)=(XY)(w∗)‾(XY)^{*}(w)=\overline{(XY)(w^{*})} are 00. Otherwise we reindex, and then use claim 1 of Properties of Complex Conjugation and Modulus and Sums over Finite Index Sets: Finite Unions, Disjoint Unions, Vanishing Terms, Dependent Pairs, Conjugation and the Modulus §conjugate:

(Y∗X∗)(w)=∑(u,v)∈QwY(v)‾ X(u)‾=∑(u,v)∈QwX(u)Y(v)‾=(XY)(w∗)‾=(XY)∗(w).(Y^{*}X^{*})(w)=\sum_{(u,v)\in Q_{w}}\overline{Y(v)}\ \overline{X(u)}=\overline{\sum_{(u,v)\in Q_{w}}X(u)Y(v)}=\overline{(XY)(w^{*})}=(XY)^{*}(w).

(d) Associativity. Let T={vz:(v,z)∈G×H}T=\{vz:(v,z)\in G\times H\} be the support set of YZYZ. For w∈W2dw\in W_{2d} let RwR_{w} be the set of ((u,v),z)∈(F×G)×H((u,v),z)\in(F\times G)\times H with (uv)z=w(uv)z=w, and let Rw′R'_{w} be the set of (u,(v,z))∈F×(G×H)(u,(v,z))\in F\times(G\times H) with u(vz)=wu(vz)=w. By Basic Properties of Words: Associativity, Reversal, Finitely Many Factorisations, and Countability §monoid, ((u,v),z)↦(u,(v,z))((u,v),z)\mapsto(u,(v,z)) is a bijection of RwR_{w} onto Rw′R'_{w}. We claim that ((XY)Z)(w)((XY)Z)(w) is the sum of X(u)Y(v)Z(z)X(u)Y(v)Z(z) over RwR_{w} when Rw≠∅R_{w}\neq\emptyset, and is 00 otherwise. By definition, ((XY)Z)(w)((XY)Z)(w) is the sum of (XY)(t)Z(z)(XY)(t)Z(z) over Ow={(t,z)∈S×H:tz=w}O_{w}=\{(t,z)\in S\times H:tz=w\}. If OwO_{w} is empty, then so is RwR_{w}, since ((u,v),z)∈Rw((u,v),z)\in R_{w} would give (uv,z)∈Ow(uv,z)\in O_{w}; in that case the value is 00. Otherwise homogeneity gives (XY)(t)Z(z)=∑(u,v)∈PtX(u)Y(v)Z(z)(XY)(t)Z(z)=\sum_{(u,v)\in P_{t}}X(u)Y(v)Z(z), where each PtP_{t} with t∈St\in S is nonempty. By Sums over Finite Index Sets: Finite Unions, Disjoint Unions, Vanishing Terms, Dependent Pairs, Conjugation and the Modulus §pairs the resulting double sum is a sum over the pairs ((t,z),(u,v))((t,z),(u,v)) with (t,z)∈Ow(t,z)\in O_{w} and (u,v)∈Pt(u,v)\in P_{t}. The map ((t,z),(u,v))↦((u,v),z)((t,z),(u,v))\mapsto((u,v),z) is a bijection of this set onto RwR_{w}, with inverse ((u,v),z)↦((uv,z),(u,v))((u,v),z)\mapsto((uv,z),(u,v)), and reindexing proves the claim. In the same way, (X(YZ))(w)(X(YZ))(w) is the sum of X(u)Y(v)Z(z)X(u)Y(v)Z(z) over Rw′R'_{w}, or 00 when Rw′=∅R'_{w}=\emptyset. Reindexing along the bijection Rw→Rw′R_{w}\to R'_{w} gives ((XY)Z)(w)=(X(YZ))(w)((XY)Z)(w)=(X(YZ))(w).

Step 4 (clause 2, linearity). Using the support set F∪GF\cup G for XX, YY and X+YX+Y, Evaluation of Word Polynomials by a Unitary Law §evaluation and additivity give λ(X+Y)=∑w∈F∪G(X(w)λ(w)+Y(w)λ(w))=λ(X)+λ(Y)\lambda(X+Y)=\sum_{w\in F\cup G}\bigl(X(w)\lambda(w)+Y(w)\lambda(w)\bigr)=\lambda(X)+\lambda(Y). Homogeneity gives λ(zX)=∑w∈FzX(w)λ(w)=zλ(X)\lambda(zX)=\sum_{w\in F}zX(w)\lambda(w)=z\lambda(X).

Step 5 (clause 3, traciality). By (Eλ_{\lambda}), λ(XY)\lambda(XY) is the sum of X(u)Y(v)λ(uv)X(u)Y(v)\lambda(uv) over (u,v)∈F×G(u,v)\in F\times G, and λ(YX)\lambda(YX) is the sum of Y(v)X(u)λ(vu)Y(v)X(u)\lambda(vu) over (v,u)∈G×F(v,u)\in G\times F. By Laws of d-Tuples of Unitaries §cyclic, λ(uv)=λ(vu)\lambda(uv)=\lambda(vu), and Y(v)X(u)=X(u)Y(v)Y(v)X(u)=X(u)Y(v) by commutativity of multiplication in C\mathbb{C}. Reindexing along the bijection (u,v)↦(v,u)(u,v)\mapsto(v,u) of F×GF\times G onto G×FG\times F gives λ(XY)=λ(YX)\lambda(XY)=\lambda(YX).

Step 6 (clause 4, adjoints). We reindex along the bijection u↦u∗u\mapsto u^{*} of FF onto F∗F^{*}, using (W1). We then use Unitary Laws: Adjoints, the Bound One, and Reduction to Cyclically Reduced Words §adjoint, claim 1 of Properties of Complex Conjugation and Modulus and Sums over Finite Index Sets: Finite Unions, Disjoint Unions, Vanishing Terms, Dependent Pairs, Conjugation and the Modulus §conjugate:

λ(X∗)=∑w∈F∗X(w∗)‾ λ(w)=∑u∈FX(u)‾ λ(u∗)=∑u∈FX(u)‾ λ(u)‾=λ(X)‾.\lambda(X^{*})=\sum_{w\in F^{*}}\overline{X(w^{*})}\,\lambda(w)=\sum_{u\in F}\overline{X(u)}\,\lambda(u^{*})=\sum_{u\in F}\overline{X(u)}\ \overline{\lambda(u)}=\overline{\lambda(X)}.

Step 7 (clause 5, positivity). Apply (Eλ_{\lambda}) to X∗X^{*} and XX, with support sets F∗F^{*} and FF, and reindex along the bijection (u,v)↦(u∗,v)(u,v)\mapsto(u^{*},v) of F×FF\times F onto F∗×FF^{*}\times F, using (W1):

λ(X∗X)=∑(u′,v)∈F∗×FX(u′∗)‾ X(v) λ(u′v)=∑(u,v)∈F×FX(u)‾ X(v) λ(u∗v).\lambda(X^{*}X)=\sum_{(u',v)\in F^{*}\times F}\overline{X(u'^{*})}\,X(v)\,\lambda(u'v)=\sum_{(u,v)\in F\times F}\overline{X(u)}\,X(v)\,\lambda(u^{*}v).

By Laws of d-Tuples of Unitaries §positive, K(u,v)=λ(u∗v)K(u,v)=\lambda(u^{*}v) is a positive semidefinite kernel on FF. The right side is its quadratic form at the restriction of XX to FF, so it is a nonnegative real number by Positive Semidefinite Kernel on a Finite Set §kernel. Now let XX and YY be self-adjoint. By clause 4 (Step 6), clause 1 (Step 3(c)) and clause 3 (Step 5), λ(XY)‾=λ((XY)∗)=λ(Y∗X∗)=λ(YX)=λ(XY)\overline{\lambda(XY)}=\lambda((XY)^{*})=\lambda(Y^{*}X^{*})=\lambda(YX)=\lambda(XY). Hence λ(XY)\lambda(XY) is real by claim 1 of Properties of Complex Conjugation and Modulus. Finally λ(XX)=λ(X∗X)≥0\lambda(XX)=\lambda(X^{*}X)\ge0.

Step 8 (clause 6, Cauchy–Schwarz). Put α=λ(X∗X)\alpha=\lambda(X^{*}X), β=λ(Y∗Y)\beta=\lambda(Y^{*}Y) and c=λ(X∗Y)c=\lambda(X^{*}Y); by Step 7, α\alpha and β\beta are nonnegative reals. By clause 1, (Y∗X)=(X∗Y)∗(Y^{*}X)=(X^{*}Y)^{*}, so λ(Y∗X)=c‾\lambda(Y^{*}X)=\overline{c} by clause 4. Let z∈Cz\in\mathbb{C}. By clause 1, (X+zY)∗(X+zY)=X∗X+z X∗Y+z‾ Y∗X+z‾z Y∗Y(X+zY)^{*}(X+zY)=X^{*}X+z\,X^{*}Y+\overline{z}\,Y^{*}X+\overline{z}z\,Y^{*}Y. Clause 2, Step 7, and claims 1, 2 and 3 of Properties of Complex Conjugation and Modulus then give

0≤q(z):=λ((X+zY)∗(X+zY))=α+zc+zc‾+∣z∣2β.0\le q(z):=\lambda\bigl((X+zY)^{*}(X+zY)\bigr)=\alpha+zc+\overline{zc}+|z|^{2}\beta .

Case 0<β0<\beta. Take z=−β−1c‾z=-\beta^{-1}\overline{c}. Then zc=−β−1∣c∣2zc=-\beta^{-1}|c|^{2} is real, so zc‾=zc\overline{zc}=zc, and ∣z∣2=zz‾=β−2∣c∣2|z|^{2}=z\overline{z}=\beta^{-2}|c|^{2} (claims 1 and 3 of Properties of Complex Conjugation and Modulus). So zc+zc‾=2zc=−2β−1∣c∣2zc+\overline{zc}=2zc=-2\beta^{-1}|c|^{2} and ∣z∣2β=β−2∣c∣2β=β−1∣c∣2|z|^{2}\beta=\beta^{-2}|c|^{2}\beta=\beta^{-1}|c|^{2}. Hence 0≤q(z)=α−2β−1∣c∣2+β−1∣c∣2=α−β−1∣c∣20\le q(z)=\alpha-2\beta^{-1}|c|^{2}+\beta^{-1}|c|^{2}=\alpha-\beta^{-1}|c|^{2}. Multiplying by β≥0\beta\ge0 (claims 3 and 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field) gives ∣c∣2≤αβ|c|^{2}\le\alpha\beta. Case β=0\beta=0. Suppose c≠0c\neq0. Then ∣c∣≠0|c|\neq0 by claim 3 of Properties of Complex Conjugation and Modulus, so 0<∣c∣20<|c|^{2} (claim 5 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field). Take z=−tc‾z=-t\overline{c} with the real number t=(α+1)∣c∣−2t=(\alpha+1)|c|^{-2}. Then zc=−(α+1)zc=-(\alpha+1) is real, and q(z)=α−2(α+1)=−α−2<0q(z)=\alpha-2(\alpha+1)=-\alpha-2<0, because 0≤α0\le\alpha and 0<20<2 give 0<2+α0<2+\alpha (claims 3, 4 and 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field). This contradicts 0≤q(z)0\le q(z), so c=0c=0 and ∣c∣2=0=αβ|c|^{2}=0=\alpha\beta. In both cases ∣λ(X∗Y)∣2≤λ(X∗X)λ(Y∗Y)|\lambda(X^{*}Y)|^{2}\le\lambda(X^{*}X)\lambda(Y^{*}Y).

Step 9 (clause 7, ℓ1\ell^{1} bounds). We use Sums over Finite Index Sets: Finite Unions, Disjoint Unions, Vanishing Terms, Dependent Pairs, Conjugation and the Modulus §modulus, claim 4 of Properties of Complex Conjugation and Modulus, and ∣λ(w)∣≤1|\lambda(w)|\le1 from Unitary Laws: Adjoints, the Bound One, and Reduction to Cyclically Reduced Words §bound, together with 0≤∣X(w)∣0\le|X(w)| and claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. With Real Sums over a Finite Index Set: Comparison, Nonnegativity, Monotonicity, Term Bounds, Absolute Values, Counting and Limits §comparison they give ∣λ(X)∣≤∑w∈F∣X(w)∣ ∣λ(w)∣≤∑w∈F∣X(w)∣=∥X∥1|\lambda(X)|\le\sum_{w\in F}|X(w)|\,|\lambda(w)|\le\sum_{w\in F}|X(w)|=\lVert X\rVert_{1}. On the support set F∪GF\cup G, the triangle inequality (claim 7 of Properties of Complex Conjugation and Modulus), Real Sums over a Finite Index Set: Comparison, Nonnegativity, Monotonicity, Term Bounds, Absolute Values, Counting and Limits §comparison and additivity give ∥X+Y∥1≤∥X∥1+∥Y∥1\lVert X+Y\rVert_{1}\le\lVert X\rVert_{1}+\lVert Y\rVert_{1}. Claim 4 of the same lemma and homogeneity give ∥zX∥1=∣z∣ ∥X∥1\lVert zX\rVert_{1}=|z|\,\lVert X\rVert_{1}. Reindexing along u↦u∗u\mapsto u^{*}, together with ∣ζ‾∣=∣ζ∣|\overline{\zeta}|=|\zeta| (claim 3 of that lemma), gives ∥X∗∥1=∑w∈F∗∣X(w∗)∣=∑u∈F∣X(u)∣=∥X∥1\lVert X^{*}\rVert_{1}=\sum_{w\in F^{*}}|X(w^{*})|=\sum_{u\in F}|X(u)|=\lVert X\rVert_{1}. Finally, for w∈Sw\in S, ∣(XY)(w)∣≤∑(u,v)∈Pw∣X(u)∣ ∣Y(v)∣|(XY)(w)|\le\sum_{(u,v)\in P_{w}}|X(u)|\,|Y(v)|. Summing over w∈Sw\in S and using Real Sums over a Finite Index Set: Comparison, Nonnegativity, Monotonicity, Term Bounds, Absolute Values, Counting and Limits §comparison, (P0) for the real map ψ((u,v))=∣X(u)∣ ∣Y(v)∣\psi((u,v))=|X(u)|\,|Y(v)|, and The Product of Two Sums over Finite Index Sets is a Sum over the Cartesian Product, we obtain

∥XY∥1=∑w∈S∣(XY)(w)∣≤∑(u,v)∈F×G∣X(u)∣ ∣Y(v)∣=(∑u∈F∣X(u)∣)(∑v∈G∣Y(v)∣)=∥X∥1∥Y∥1.■\lVert XY\rVert_{1}=\sum_{w\in S}|(XY)(w)|\le\sum_{(u,v)\in F\times G}|X(u)|\,|Y(v)|=\Bigl(\sum_{u\in F}|X(u)|\Bigr)\Bigl(\sum_{v\in G}|Y(v)|\Bigr)=\lVert X\rVert_{1}\lVert Y\rVert_{1}.\qquad\blacksquare

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…