Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.
Throughout, X,Y,Z have support sets F,G,H (Word Polynomials in Unitary Letters: the Normed *-Algebra of Finitely Supported Word Functions §polynomials). For A⊆W2d we write A∗={u∗:u∈A}. As in Word Polynomials in Unitary Letters: the Normed *-Algebra of Finitely Supported Word Functions §product, S={uv:(u,v)∈F×G} is the support set of XY and Pw={(u,v)∈F×G:uv=w}. Finite sums are those of Sum over a Finite Index Set over the field C or R; reindexing, additivity and homogeneity refer to claims 2, 3 and 4 of Properties of a Sum over a Finite Index Set. Products, evaluations and ℓ1 norms do not depend on the support sets used (Word Polynomials in Unitary Letters: the Normed *-Algebra of Finitely Supported Word Functions §product, Evaluation of Word Polynomials by a Unitary Law §evaluation, Word Polynomials in Unitary Letters: the Normed *-Algebra of Finitely Supported Word Functions §norm); so whenever convenient we replace a support set by a larger nonempty finite set, for instance F and G by F∪G, which is finite by Sums over Finite Index Sets: Finite Unions, Disjoint Unions, Vanishing Terms, Dependent Pairs, Conjugation and the Modulus §finite-union and outside which both X and Y vanish.
Step 1 (adjoint words). (W1) (w∗)∗=w for every w∈W2d, as shown in Word Polynomials in Unitary Letters: the Normed *-Algebra of Finitely Supported Word Functions §adjoint. Hence u↦u∗ is its own inverse, and for every A⊆W2d it restricts to a bijection of A onto A∗, with (A∗)∗=A.
(W2) (uv)∗=v∗u∗ for all u,v∈W2d. If u=∅ or v=∅ this follows from ∅∗=∅ (Words in Unitary Letters: Generators, Signs, Inverse Letters, Lengths and Adjoint Words §adjoint) and Basic Properties of Words: Associativity, Reversal, Finitely Many Factorisations, and Countability §monoid. Otherwise, for a word x of length k let x∨ be the word of length k with (x∨)i=(xi)−1 for i∈[k]; then x∗=(xrev)∨ by Words in Unitary Letters: Generators, Signs, Inverse Letters, Lengths and Adjoint Words §adjoint. By Words over a Finite Alphabet: the Empty Word, Concatenation and Reversal §concatenation the letters of xy are those of x followed by those of y, so (xy)∨=x∨y∨. By Basic Properties of Words: Associativity, Reversal, Finitely Many Factorisations, and Countability §reversal, (uv)rev=vrevurev, and therefore (uv)∗=(vrevurev)∨=(vrev)∨(urev)∨=v∗u∗.
Step 2 (regrouping over factorisations). (P0) For every map ψ:F×G→C (or R),
w∈S∑ (u,v)∈Pw∑ψ((u,v))=(u,v)∈F×G∑ψ((u,v)).
Indeed, S is nonempty and finite, and each Pw with w∈S is nonempty, since w=uv for some (u,v)∈F×G. By Sums over Finite Index Sets: Finite Unions, Disjoint Unions, Vanishing Terms, Dependent Pairs, Conjugation and the Modulus §pairs the left side is the sum over the set T of pairs (w,(u,v)) with w∈S and (u,v)∈Pw. The map (w,(u,v))↦(u,v) is a bijection of T onto F×G, since w=uv is determined by (u,v) and (uv,(u,v))∈T for every (u,v)∈F×G; reindexing gives (P0).
(E) For every map φ:W2d→C,
w∈S∑(XY)(w)φ(w)=(u,v)∈F×G∑X(u)Y(v)φ(uv).
Indeed, for w∈S homogeneity gives (XY)(w)φ(w)=∑(u,v)∈PwX(u)Y(v)φ(uv), since uv=w on Pw, and (P0) applies. With φ=λ, Evaluation of Word Polynomials by a Unitary Law §evaluation and the support set S of XY give
λ(XY)=(u,v)∈F×G∑X(u)Y(v)λ(uv).(Eλ)
Step 3 (clause 1, algebra). (a) Sums and scalars. Use the support set F∪G for X, Y and X+Y, and H for Z (Word Polynomials in Unitary Letters: the Normed *-Algebra of Finitely Supported Word Functions §polynomials). For w∈W2d the set of pairs (u,v)∈(F∪G)×H with uv=w is then the same for the products (X+Y)Z, XZ and YZ. If it is empty, all three values at w are 0. Otherwise distributivity in C and additivity give ∑(X(u)+Y(u))Z(v)=∑X(u)Z(v)+∑Y(u)Z(v) over this set, that is, ((X+Y)Z)(w)=(XZ)(w)+(YZ)(w). The identities Z(X+Y)=ZX+ZY and (zX)Y=z(XY)=X(zY) follow in the same way, the latter by homogeneity. Pointwise, (X+Y)∗(w)=X(w∗)+Y(w∗)=X∗(w)+Y∗(w) and (zX)∗(w)=zX(w∗)=zX∗(w), by claim 1 of Properties of Complex Conjugation and Modulus. Also (X∗)∗(w)=X∗(w∗)=X((w∗)∗)=X(w) by (W1) and claim 1 of the same lemma.
(b) The words eu. With the support sets {u} and {v}, the set of pairs in {u}×{v} with product w is {(u,v)} if w=uv and empty otherwise. So (euev)(w) is 1⋅1=1 if w=uv and 0 otherwise, which means euev=euv. Next, (eu)∗(w)=eu(w∗) is 1 if w∗=u, that is, if w=u∗ by (W1), and 0 otherwise; so (eu)∗=eu∗. With the support sets {∅} and F, the pairs in {∅}×F with product w form {(∅,w)} if w∈F and the empty set otherwise, because ∅v=v (Basic Properties of Words: Associativity, Reversal, Finitely Many Factorisations, and Countability §monoid). Hence (e∅X)(w)=X(w) for w∈F, and (e∅X)(w)=0=X(w) for w∈/F. In the same way, Xe∅=X.
(c) (XY)∗=Y∗X∗. Use the support sets G∗ and F∗ of Y∗ and X∗ (Word Polynomials in Unitary Letters: the Normed *-Algebra of Finitely Supported Word Functions §adjoint). Let w∈W2d, let Qw={(u,v)∈F×G:uv=w∗}, and let Qw′={(v′,u′)∈G∗×F∗:v′u′=w}. The map (u,v)↦(v∗,u∗) is a bijection of Qw onto Qw′, with inverse (v′,u′)↦(u′∗,v′∗): by (W1) and (W2), uv=w∗ holds if and only if w=(uv)∗=v∗u∗. If Qw is empty, so is Qw′, and both (Y∗X∗)(w) and (XY)∗(w)=(XY)(w∗) are 0. Otherwise we reindex, and then use claim 1 of Properties of Complex Conjugation and Modulus and Sums over Finite Index Sets: Finite Unions, Disjoint Unions, Vanishing Terms, Dependent Pairs, Conjugation and the Modulus §conjugate:
(Y∗X∗)(w)=(u,v)∈Qw∑Y(v) X(u)=(u,v)∈Qw∑X(u)Y(v)=(XY)(w∗)=(XY)∗(w).
(d) Associativity. Let T={vz:(v,z)∈G×H} be the support set of YZ. For w∈W2d let Rw be the set of ((u,v),z)∈(F×G)×H with (uv)z=w, and let Rw′ be the set of (u,(v,z))∈F×(G×H) with u(vz)=w. By Basic Properties of Words: Associativity, Reversal, Finitely Many Factorisations, and Countability §monoid, ((u,v),z)↦(u,(v,z)) is a bijection of Rw onto Rw′. We claim that ((XY)Z)(w) is the sum of X(u)Y(v)Z(z) over Rw when Rw=∅, and is 0 otherwise. By definition, ((XY)Z)(w) is the sum of (XY)(t)Z(z) over Ow={(t,z)∈S×H:tz=w}. If Ow is empty, then so is Rw, since ((u,v),z)∈Rw would give (uv,z)∈Ow; in that case the value is 0. Otherwise homogeneity gives (XY)(t)Z(z)=∑(u,v)∈PtX(u)Y(v)Z(z), where each Pt with t∈S is nonempty. By Sums over Finite Index Sets: Finite Unions, Disjoint Unions, Vanishing Terms, Dependent Pairs, Conjugation and the Modulus §pairs the resulting double sum is a sum over the pairs ((t,z),(u,v)) with (t,z)∈Ow and (u,v)∈Pt. The map ((t,z),(u,v))↦((u,v),z) is a bijection of this set onto Rw, with inverse ((u,v),z)↦((uv,z),(u,v)), and reindexing proves the claim. In the same way, (X(YZ))(w) is the sum of X(u)Y(v)Z(z) over Rw′, or 0 when Rw′=∅. Reindexing along the bijection Rw→Rw′ gives ((XY)Z)(w)=(X(YZ))(w).
Step 4 (clause 2, linearity). Using the support set F∪G for X, Y and X+Y, Evaluation of Word Polynomials by a Unitary Law §evaluation and additivity give λ(X+Y)=∑w∈F∪G(X(w)λ(w)+Y(w)λ(w))=λ(X)+λ(Y). Homogeneity gives λ(zX)=∑w∈FzX(w)λ(w)=zλ(X).
Step 5 (clause 3, traciality). By (Eλ), λ(XY) is the sum of X(u)Y(v)λ(uv) over (u,v)∈F×G, and λ(YX) is the sum of Y(v)X(u)λ(vu) over (v,u)∈G×F. By Laws of d-Tuples of Unitaries §cyclic, λ(uv)=λ(vu), and Y(v)X(u)=X(u)Y(v) by commutativity of multiplication in C. Reindexing along the bijection (u,v)↦(v,u) of F×G onto G×F gives λ(XY)=λ(YX).
Step 6 (clause 4, adjoints). We reindex along the bijection u↦u∗ of F onto F∗, using (W1). We then use Unitary Laws: Adjoints, the Bound One, and Reduction to Cyclically Reduced Words §adjoint, claim 1 of Properties of Complex Conjugation and Modulus and Sums over Finite Index Sets: Finite Unions, Disjoint Unions, Vanishing Terms, Dependent Pairs, Conjugation and the Modulus §conjugate:
λ(X∗)=w∈F∗∑X(w∗)λ(w)=u∈F∑X(u)λ(u∗)=u∈F∑X(u) λ(u)=λ(X).
Step 7 (clause 5, positivity). Apply (Eλ) to X∗ and X, with support sets F∗ and F, and reindex along the bijection (u,v)↦(u∗,v) of F×F onto F∗×F, using (W1):
λ(X∗X)=(u′,v)∈F∗×F∑X(u′∗)X(v)λ(u′v)=(u,v)∈F×F∑X(u)X(v)λ(u∗v).
By Laws of d-Tuples of Unitaries §positive, K(u,v)=λ(u∗v) is a positive semidefinite kernel on F. The right side is its quadratic form at the restriction of X to F, so it is a nonnegative real number by Positive Semidefinite Kernel on a Finite Set §kernel. Now let X and Y be self-adjoint. By clause 4 (Step 6), clause 1 (Step 3(c)) and clause 3 (Step 5), λ(XY)=λ((XY)∗)=λ(Y∗X∗)=λ(YX)=λ(XY). Hence λ(XY) is real by claim 1 of Properties of Complex Conjugation and Modulus. Finally λ(XX)=λ(X∗X)≥0.
Step 8 (clause 6, Cauchy–Schwarz). Put α=λ(X∗X), β=λ(Y∗Y) and c=λ(X∗Y); by Step 7, α and β are nonnegative reals. By clause 1, (Y∗X)=(X∗Y)∗, so λ(Y∗X)=c by clause 4. Let z∈C. By clause 1, (X+zY)∗(X+zY)=X∗X+zX∗Y+zY∗X+zzY∗Y. Clause 2, Step 7, and claims 1, 2 and 3 of Properties of Complex Conjugation and Modulus then give
0≤q(z):=λ((X+zY)∗(X+zY))=α+zc+zc+∣z∣2β.
Case 0<β. Take z=−β−1c. Then zc=−β−1∣c∣2 is real, so zc=zc, and ∣z∣2=zz=β−2∣c∣2 (claims 1 and 3 of Properties of Complex Conjugation and Modulus). So zc+zc=2zc=−2β−1∣c∣2 and ∣z∣2β=β−2∣c∣2β=β−1∣c∣2. Hence 0≤q(z)=α−2β−1∣c∣2+β−1∣c∣2=α−β−1∣c∣2. Multiplying by β≥0 (claims 3 and 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field) gives ∣c∣2≤αβ. Case β=0. Suppose c=0. Then ∣c∣=0 by claim 3 of Properties of Complex Conjugation and Modulus, so 0<∣c∣2 (claim 5 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field). Take z=−tc with the real number t=(α+1)∣c∣−2. Then zc=−(α+1) is real, and q(z)=α−2(α+1)=−α−2<0, because 0≤α and 0<2 give 0<2+α (claims 3, 4 and 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field). This contradicts 0≤q(z), so c=0 and ∣c∣2=0=αβ. In both cases ∣λ(X∗Y)∣2≤λ(X∗X)λ(Y∗Y).
Step 9 (clause 7, ℓ1 bounds). We use Sums over Finite Index Sets: Finite Unions, Disjoint Unions, Vanishing Terms, Dependent Pairs, Conjugation and the Modulus §modulus, claim 4 of Properties of Complex Conjugation and Modulus, and ∣λ(w)∣≤1 from Unitary Laws: Adjoints, the Bound One, and Reduction to Cyclically Reduced Words §bound, together with 0≤∣X(w)∣ and claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. With Real Sums over a Finite Index Set: Comparison, Nonnegativity, Monotonicity, Term Bounds, Absolute Values, Counting and Limits §comparison they give ∣λ(X)∣≤∑w∈F∣X(w)∣∣λ(w)∣≤∑w∈F∣X(w)∣=∥X∥1. On the support set F∪G, the triangle inequality (claim 7 of Properties of Complex Conjugation and Modulus), Real Sums over a Finite Index Set: Comparison, Nonnegativity, Monotonicity, Term Bounds, Absolute Values, Counting and Limits §comparison and additivity give ∥X+Y∥1≤∥X∥1+∥Y∥1. Claim 4 of the same lemma and homogeneity give ∥zX∥1=∣z∣∥X∥1. Reindexing along u↦u∗, together with ∣ζ∣=∣ζ∣ (claim 3 of that lemma), gives ∥X∗∥1=∑w∈F∗∣X(w∗)∣=∑u∈F∣X(u)∣=∥X∥1. Finally, for w∈S, ∣(XY)(w)∣≤∑(u,v)∈Pw∣X(u)∣∣Y(v)∣. Summing over w∈S and using Real Sums over a Finite Index Set: Comparison, Nonnegativity, Monotonicity, Term Bounds, Absolute Values, Counting and Limits §comparison, (P0) for the real map ψ((u,v))=∣X(u)∣∣Y(v)∣, and The Product of Two Sums over Finite Index Sets is a Sum over the Cartesian Product, we obtain
∥XY∥1=w∈S∑∣(XY)(w)∣≤(u,v)∈F×G∑∣X(u)∣∣Y(v)∣=(u∈F∑∣X(u)∣)(v∈G∑∣Y(v)∣)=∥X∥1∥Y∥1.■