TheoremBase

For each index the rationals in the two intervals of length δ below and above the component are nonempty sets by density of the rationals; finite choice over the finite index set picks one in each, and for matrices currying turns the choice on [p]×[q] into a p-tuple of q-tuples.

Proof

A general step. Let LL be a finite set, w:L→Rw:L\to\mathbb{R} a map, with wl=w(l)w_{l}=w(l), and δ∈R\delta\in\mathbb{R} with 0<δ0<\delta. Then there are maps f,g:L→Qf,g:L\to\mathbb{Q} with wl−δ<κ(f(l))<wl<κ(g(l))<wl+δw_{l}-\delta<\kappa(f(l))<w_{l}<\kappa(g(l))<w_{l}+\delta for every l∈Ll\in L. For l∈Ll\in L let

Cl={u∈Q:wl−δ<κ(u)<wl},Dl={u∈Q:wl<κ(u)<wl+δ},C_{l}=\{u\in\mathbb{Q}:w_{l}-\delta<\kappa(u)<w_{l}\},\qquad D_{l}=\{u\in\mathbb{Q}:w_{l}<\kappa(u)<w_{l}+\delta\},

subsets of Q\mathbb{Q}; l↦Cll\mapsto C_{l} and l↦Dll\mapsto D_{l} are families of sets indexed by LL, maps from LL to P(Q)\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{Q}) given by these expressions (Maps and Relations Given by Formulas (i)). Let l∈Ll\in L. The field R\mathbb{R} is an ordered field in which every nonempty subset that is bounded above has a supremum, and its canonical embedding is κ\kappa, by The Real Numbers, with the Natural Numbers, Integers and Rationals Identified with Subsets of the Reals, and Completeness (vii); so Infima, the Archimedean Property, Density of the Rationals and Rational Approximation from Below in an Ordered Field Whose Nonempty Sets Bounded Above Have Suprema (iii), applied to wl−δ<wlw_{l}-\delta<w_{l} and to wl<wl+δw_{l}<w_{l}+\delta, which follow from 0<δ0<\delta by Rules of Order in an Ordered Ring: Differences, Sums, Negatives, Products and Squares (ii), adding wl−δw_{l}-\delta, respectively wlw_{l}, to both sides, gives u∈Qu\in\mathbb{Q} with wl−δ<κ(u)<wlw_{l}-\delta<\kappa(u)<w_{l} and u′∈Qu'\in\mathbb{Q} with wl<κ(u′)<wl+δw_{l}<\kappa(u')<w_{l}+\delta. Hence Cl≠∅C_{l}\neq\emptyset and Dl≠∅D_{l}\neq\emptyset for every l∈Ll\in L. As LL is finite, Finite Sets: the Pigeonhole Principle, Uniqueness of the Length, Subsets, Unions, Products, Images, Bounded Sets of Natural Numbers, Extreme Elements, Sets of Maps, Finite Unions and Finite Choice (xi) gives a map f:L→⋃l∈LClf:L\to\bigcup_{l\in L}C_{l} with f(l)∈Clf(l)\in C_{l} for every l∈Ll\in L, and a map g:L→⋃l∈LDlg:L\to\bigcup_{l\in L}D_{l} with g(l)∈Dlg(l)\in D_{l} for every l∈Ll\in L. Both unions are subsets of Q\mathbb{Q}, by Indexed Families of Sets and Their Union, Intersection and Product (ii), so ff and gg are maps L→QL\to\mathbb{Q}, and f(l)∈Clf(l)\in C_{l} and g(l)∈Dlg(l)\in D_{l} are the required inequalities.

Proof of (i). [n][n] is finite by Finite Sets: the Pigeonhole Principle, Uniqueness of the Length, Subsets, Unions, Products, Images, Bounded Sets of Natural Numbers, Extreme Elements, Sets of Maps, Finite Unions and Finite Choice (vii), since k≤nk\le n for every k∈[n]k\in[n] by Intervals of Natural Numbers: Initial Segments, Adding One Element, Splitting and Shifting (i), and yy is a map [n]→R[n]\to\mathbb{R} with y(i)=yiy(i)=y_{i}, by Euclidean Space Rn\mathbb{R}^n: n-Tuples of Real Numbers with Their Componentwise Operations (ii). The general step with L=[n]L=[n] and w=yw=y gives maps f,g:[n]→Qf,g:[n]\to\mathbb{Q}, which are elements a=fa=f and b=gb=g of Qn\mathbb{Q}^{n} by Tuples in a Set: the Set of n-Tuples and Their Components (ii), with ai=f(i)a_{i}=f(i) and bi=g(i)b_{i}=g(i) by Tuples in a Set: the Set of n-Tuples and Their Components (iii); the inequalities of the general step are those of (i).

Proof of (ii). [p][p] and [q][q] are finite as in the proof of (i), so [p]×[q][p]\times[q] is finite by Finite Sets: the Pigeonhole Principle, Uniqueness of the Length, Subsets, Unions, Products, Images, Bounded Sets of Natural Numbers, Extreme Elements, Sets of Maps, Finite Unions and Finite Choice (v), and AA is a map [p]×[q]→R[p]\times[q]\to\mathbb{R} with A(i,j)=AijA(i,j)=A_{ij}, by Real Matrices: the Set of Real m x n Matrices with Their Entrywise Operations (i) and Real Matrices: the Set of Real m x n Matrices with Their Entrywise Operations (ii). The general step with L=[p]×[q]L=[p]\times[q] and w=Aw=A gives maps f,g:[p]×[q]→Qf,g:[p]\times[q]\to\mathbb{Q} with Aij−δ<κ(f(i,j))<Aij<κ(g(i,j))<Aij+δA_{ij}-\delta<\kappa(f(i,j))<A_{ij}<\kappa(g(i,j))<A_{ij}+\delta for all i∈[p]i\in[p] and j∈[q]j\in[q]. By Projection, Evaluation and Currying Maps (iii), with X=[p]X=[p], I=[q]I=[q] and Y=QY=\mathbb{Q}, there is a map a:[p]→Q[q]a:[p]\to\mathbb{Q}^{[q]} with a(i)(j)=f(i,j)a(i)(j)=f(i,j) for all i∈[p]i\in[p] and j∈[q]j\in[q], and likewise a map b:[p]→Q[q]b:[p]\to\mathbb{Q}^{[q]} with b(i)(j)=g(i,j)b(i)(j)=g(i,j). As Q[q]=Qq\mathbb{Q}^{[q]}=\mathbb{Q}^{q} by Tuples in a Set: the Set of n-Tuples and Their Components (i), aa and bb are elements of (Qq)p(\mathbb{Q}^{q})^{p} by Tuples in a Set: the Set of n-Tuples and Their Components (ii), and by Tuples in a Set: the Set of n-Tuples and Their Components (iii) their entries are aij=a(i)(j)=f(i,j)a_{ij}=a(i)(j)=f(i,j) and bij=b(i)(j)=g(i,j)b_{ij}=b(i)(j)=g(i,j). So the inequalities above are those of (ii).

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…