TheoremBase

Sketch: for x ≠ 0 extend t x ↦ t‖x‖ from the line ℝx by the Hahn–Banach theorem with p = ‖·‖; the zero functional handles x = 0, and a norming functional of x − y separates x from y.

Proof

We first treat a point x≠0Xx\neq0_{X} and construct F∈X∗F\in X^{*} with ∥F∥∗=1\lVert F\rVert_{*}=1 and F(x)=∥x∥F(x)=\lVert x\rVert. The norm is a sublinear functional on XX by Elementary Properties of Sublinear Functionals (iv), and

−∥−x∥≤∥x∥≤∥x∥,-\lVert -x\rVert\le\lVert x\rVert\le\lVert x\rVert,

because ∥−x∥=∥(−1)x∥=∥x∥\lVert -x\rVert=\lVert(-1)x\rVert=\lVert x\rVert by Elementary Identities in a Vector Space (iv) and Norms and Real Normed Spaces (iii). So A Dominated Linear Functional on a Line (i) and A Dominated Linear Functional on a Line (ii), applied with p=∥⋅∥p=\lVert\cdot\rVert, x0=xx_{0}=x and c=∥x∥c=\lVert x\rVert, give the linear subspace Rx\mathbb{R}x of XX and the linear functional ff on it with f(tx)=t∥x∥f(tx)=t\lVert x\rVert for t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R} and f≤∥⋅∥f\le\lVert\cdot\rVert on Rx\mathbb{R}x. By The Hahn–Banach Theorem in a Separable Real Normed Space (i), applied with p=∥⋅∥p=\lVert\cdot\rVert, the constant 11 and ff on Rx\mathbb{R}x, there is F∈X∗F\in X^{*} with F=fF=f on Rx\mathbb{R}x and F≤∥⋅∥F\le\lVert\cdot\rVert on XX; in particular, as x=1xx=1x (Vector Space over a Field (vi)),

F(x)=f(1x)=∥x∥.F(x)=f(1x)=\lVert x\rVert .

By Elementary Properties of Sublinear Functionals (vi) (with M=XM=X and C=1C=1), ∣F(y)∣≤∥y∥|F(y)|\le\lVert y\rVert for every y∈Xy\in X, so 1∈BF1\in B_{F} by Bounded Linear Functionals and the Dual Space of a Real Normed Space (ii). The dual norm is ∥F∥∗=inf⁡BF\lVert F\rVert_{*}=\inf B_{F} and an infimum is a lower bound (Bounds, Least and Greatest Elements, Suprema and Infima for a Partial Order (iv)), so ∥F∥∗≤1\lVert F\rVert_{*}\le1. Conversely, The Nonnegative Bounds of a Bounded Linear Functional Have an Infimum, Which Is a Bound (ii) gives ∥x∥=F(x)≤∥F∥∗∥x∥\lVert x\rVert=F(x)\le\lVert F\rVert_{*}\lVert x\rVert, and ∥x∥>0\lVert x\rVert>0 by Norms and Real Normed Spaces (i) and Norms and Real Normed Spaces (ii); dividing by ∥x∥\lVert x\rVert gives ∥F∥∗≥1\lVert F\rVert_{*}\ge1. Hence ∥F∥∗=1\lVert F\rVert_{*}=1.

For x=0Xx=0_{X}, the zero functional on XX is linear (Linear Functional on a Linear Subspace (iii)) and has the bound 00, so it lies in X∗X^{*} by Bounded Linear Functionals and the Dual Space of a Real Normed Space (iii) and Bounded Linear Functionals and the Dual Space of a Real Normed Space (iv). Its dual norm is at most 11, as 11 lies in its set of nonnegative bounds (Bounded Linear Functionals and the Dual Space of a Real Normed Space (ii)), and its value at 0X0_{X} is 0=∥0X∥0=\lVert0_{X}\rVert by The Norm Metric of a Real Normed Space (i). Together with the case x≠0Xx\neq0_{X}, this proves (i).

For (ii), suppose X≠{0X}X\neq\{0_{X}\}. For x≠0Xx\neq0_{X} the functional constructed above will do. For x=0Xx=0_{X}, fix a point y≠0Xy\neq0_{X} of XX and let FF be the functional constructed above for yy. Then ∥F∥∗=1\lVert F\rVert_{*}=1, and

F(0X)=F(0⋅0X)=0⋅F(0X)=0=∥0X∥F(0_{X})=F(0\cdot0_{X})=0\cdot F(0_{X})=0=\lVert0_{X}\rVert

by Elementary Identities in a Vector Space (ii), Linear Functional on a Linear Subspace (ii) and The Norm Metric of a Real Normed Space (i).

For (iii), let x≠yx\neq y. Then x−y≠0Xx-y\neq0_{X}, since x−y=0Xx-y=0_{X} would give x=y+(x−y)=yx=y+(x-y)=y (Elementary Identities in a Vector Space (viii)). Let FF be the functional constructed above for x−yx-y. By Linear Functional on a Linear Subspace (i), Linear Functional on a Linear Subspace (ii) and Norms and Real Normed Spaces (ii),

F(x)−F(y)=F(x−y)=∥x−y∥>0,F(x)-F(y)=F(x-y)=\lVert x-y\rVert>0,

so F(x)≠F(y)F(x)\neq F(y).

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…