TheoremBase

Each representative lies in the sixth Lebesgue class by the Sobolev embedding, hence in the fourth by comparison of seminorms on a space of total measure one; Hoelder's inequality with four exponents equal to four then bounds the product. The remaining clauses are the diagonal case and the square-integrable pairing.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement and is applied here to the data at hand; the notation is that of the statement, and the measure space throughout is (Q,BQ,λQ)(Q,\mathcal{B}_{Q},\lambda_{Q}) of The Flat Torus: Standing Notation (iii). Finite products of real numbers are the finite products of that definition, so that ∏k=14ak\prod_{k=1}^{4}a_{k} is the iterated product ((a1a2)a3)a4((a_{1}a_{2})a_{3})a_{4} by the recursion defining it.

Step 0 (A product comparison). Let α,β,γ,δ∈R\alpha,\beta,\gamma,\delta\in\mathbb{R} satisfy 0≤α0\le\alpha, α≤β\alpha\le\beta, 0≤γ0\le\gamma and γ≤δ\gamma\le\delta. Then αγ≤βδ\alpha\gamma\le\beta\delta. Indeed, claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, applied to α≤β\alpha\le\beta with the nonnegative multiplier γ\gamma, gives γα≤γβ\gamma\alpha\le\gamma\beta; the number β\beta is nonnegative by transitivity of the order of The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background (i) applied to 0≤α0\le\alpha and α≤β\alpha\le\beta, so the same claim applied to γ≤δ\gamma\le\delta with the multiplier β\beta gives βγ≤βδ\beta\gamma\le\beta\delta; and transitivity together with commutativity of multiplication gives αγ≤βδ\alpha\gamma\le\beta\delta. We record also that a product of two nonnegative real numbers is nonnegative: if 0≤α0\le\alpha and 0≤γ0\le\gamma, then α⋅0≤αγ\alpha\cdot0\le\alpha\gamma by claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, while α⋅0=0⋅α=0\alpha\cdot0=0\cdot\alpha=0 by commutativity and claim 1 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field, so 0≤αγ0\le\alpha\gamma.

Step 1 (Membership in L1(Tn)\mathcal{L}^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) and integrability). Let f:Q→Rf:Q\to\mathbb{R} be measurable. By Properties of Real Powers (ii) the power of a nonnegative real number with exponent 11 is that number itself, so the map ∣f∣1|f|^{1} of Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm (i) is ∣f∣|f|. Hence, by Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm (ii), f∈L1(Tn)f\in\mathcal{L}^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) if and only if ∫Tn∣f∣ dx<∞\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}|f|\,dx<\infty, which by the last sentence of Integrable Functions and Their Lebesgue Integral holds if and only if ff is integrable; and in that case ∥f∥1=∫Tn∣f∣ dx\lVert f\rVert_{1}=\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}|f|\,dx by Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm (iii), since 1/1=11/1=1 and the power with exponent 11 is the identity by the clause just cited.

Claim 1. Let U1,U2,U3,U4U_{1},U_{2},U_{3},U_{4} and their representatives u1,u2,u3,u4u_{1},u_{2},u_{3},u_{4} be as in the claim.

(a) Since 1≤n1\le n and n≤3n\le3, The Sobolev Embedding of the First Sobolev Space of the Torus into the Sixth Lebesgue Space in Dimensions at Most Three (ii), applied for each kk to the class UkU_{k} and its representative uku_{k}, gives uk∈L6(Tn)u_{k}\in\mathcal{L}^{6}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) and ∥uk∥6≤5 ∥Uk∥H1\lVert u_{k}\rVert_{6}\le5\,\lVert U_{k}\rVert_{H^{1}}.

(b) The real numbers 44 and 66 satisfy 1≤41\le4 and 4≤64\le6, so Comparison of the Lebesgue Seminorms on the Torus (i), applied with r=4r=4, s=6s=6 and v=ukv=u_{k}, gives uk∈L4(Tn)u_{k}\in\mathcal{L}^{4}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) and ∥uk∥4≤∥uk∥6\lVert u_{k}\rVert_{4}\le\lVert u_{k}\rVert_{6}. With (a) and transitivity of the order, ∥uk∥4≤5 ∥Uk∥H1\lVert u_{k}\rVert_{4}\le5\,\lVert U_{k}\rVert_{H^{1}} for each kk.

(c) The real number 44 is positive, hence nonzero and invertible, by claim 3 of Properties of the Canonical Map from the Natural Numbers to an Ordered Field. Repeated use of the recursion in claim 1 of Properties of Finite Sums together with claim 1 of Properties of the Canonical Map from the Natural Numbers to an Ordered Field gives ∑k=141=4\sum_{k=1}^{4}1=4, whence by claim 3 of the former

∑k=1414=14∑k=141=14⋅4=1.\sum_{k=1}^{4}\frac{1}{4}=\frac{1}{4}\sum_{k=1}^{4}1=\frac{1}{4}\cdot 4=1 .

Therefore Hölder's Inequality (ii), applied to the measure space (Q,BQ,λQ)(Q,\mathcal{B}_{Q},\lambda_{Q}) with the number of factors — written nn in that clause, and not to be confused with the dimension nn of the present statement — taken to be 44, with pk=4p_{k}=4 and fk=ukf_{k}=u_{k} for k∈[4]k\in[4], shows that the pointwise product F=u1u2u3u4F=u_{1}u_{2}u_{3}u_{4} lies in L1(Tn)\mathcal{L}^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) and

∫Tn∣F∣ dx≤∥u1∥4∥u2∥4∥u3∥4∥u4∥4.\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}|F|\,dx\le\lVert u_{1}\rVert_{4}\lVert u_{2}\rVert_{4}\lVert u_{3}\rVert_{4}\lVert u_{4}\rVert_{4}.

(d) Seminorms are nonnegative by Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm (iii), norms are nonnegative by Real Inner Product Spaces (ii), and 5=1+1+1+1+15=1+1+1+1+1 is nonnegative by claims 1 and 2 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field; hence each 5∥Uk∥H15\lVert U_{k}\rVert_{H^{1}} is nonnegative by the product remark of Step 0, and so is each partial product of the numbers ∥uk∥4\lVert u_{k}\rVert_{4} and each partial product of the numbers 5∥Uk∥H15\lVert U_{k}\rVert_{H^{1}}. Three applications of Step 0 to the four comparisons of (b), the hypotheses 0≤α0\le\alpha and 0≤γ0\le\gamma being supplied at each application by these nonnegativity facts, give

∥u1∥4∥u2∥4∥u3∥4∥u4∥4≤(5∥U1∥H1)(5∥U2∥H1)(5∥U3∥H1)(5∥U4∥H1),\lVert u_{1}\rVert_{4}\lVert u_{2}\rVert_{4}\lVert u_{3}\rVert_{4}\lVert u_{4}\rVert_{4}\le\bigl(5\lVert U_{1}\rVert_{H^{1}}\bigr)\bigl(5\lVert U_{2}\rVert_{H^{1}}\bigr)\bigl(5\lVert U_{3}\rVert_{H^{1}}\bigr)\bigl(5\lVert U_{4}\rVert_{H^{1}}\bigr),

and the right-hand side equals 625 ∥U1∥H1∥U2∥H1∥U3∥H1∥U4∥H1625\,\lVert U_{1}\rVert_{H^{1}}\lVert U_{2}\rVert_{H^{1}}\lVert U_{3}\rVert_{H^{1}}\lVert U_{4}\rVert_{H^{1}} by associativity and commutativity of multiplication together with claim 1 of Properties of Natural Number Powers in a Field, which gives ((5⋅5)⋅5)⋅5=54=625((5\cdot5)\cdot5)\cdot5=5^{4}=625.

(e) By Step 1 the function FF is integrable, so claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion gives ∣∫TnF dx∣≤∫Tn∣F∣ dx\bigl|\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}F\,dx\bigr|\le\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}|F|\,dx. Combining this with (c) and (d) and using transitivity of the order yields the asserted bound.

(f) Let u1′,u2′,u3′,u4′u'_{1},u'_{2},u'_{3},u'_{4} be any representatives of U1,U2,U3,U4U_{1},U_{2},U_{3},U_{4}. For each kk one has uk′=uku'_{k}=u_{k} almost everywhere by The Lebesgue Space Lᵖ(μ) (i). Applying the last sentence of claim 1 of The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets to the sequence of properties QmQ_{m} (m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N}), where QmQ_{m} is the property uk′(y)=uk(y)u'_{k}(y)=u_{k}(y) with kk the lesser of mm and 44, we conclude that almost every y∈Qy\in Q satisfies uk′(y)=uk(y)u'_{k}(y)=u_{k}(y) for all k∈[4]k\in[4] simultaneously; at every such yy the pointwise products u1′u2′u3′u4′u'_{1}u'_{2}u'_{3}u'_{4} and FF agree. The product u1′u2′u3′u4′u'_{1}u'_{2}u'_{3}u'_{4} is measurable by claim 3 of Arithmetic of Measurable Real- and [0,∞]-Valued Maps. Hence the last sentence of The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets (iii), applied with the integrable FF and this product, shows that the latter is integrable with the same integral. This proves claim 1.

Claim 2. Let UU and uu be as in the claim. By claim 1 of Properties of Natural Number Powers in a Field, for every y∈Qy\in Q,

(u(y))4=(u(y))3u(y)=((u(y))2u(y))u(y)=((u(y)u(y))u(y))u(y),(u(y))^{4}=(u(y))^{3}u(y)=\bigl((u(y))^{2}u(y)\bigr)u(y)=\bigl((u(y)u(y))u(y)\bigr)u(y),

so the pointwise fourth power u4u^{4} is the pointwise product of the four maps u,u,u,uu,u,u,u. Claim 1, applied with U1=U2=U3=U4=UU_{1}=U_{2}=U_{3}=U_{4}=U and u1=u2=u3=u4=uu_{1}=u_{2}=u_{3}=u_{4}=u, therefore gives u4∈L1(Tn)u^{4}\in\mathcal{L}^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}), the independence of ∫Tnu4 dx\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}u^{4}\,dx from the representative chosen, and

∣∫Tnu4 dx∣≤625 ∥U∥H1∥U∥H1∥U∥H1∥U∥H1=625 (∥U∥H1)4,\Bigl|\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}u^{4}\,dx\Bigr|\le625\,\lVert U\rVert_{H^{1}}\lVert U\rVert_{H^{1}}\lVert U\rVert_{H^{1}}\lVert U\rVert_{H^{1}}=625\,\bigl(\lVert U\rVert_{H^{1}}\bigr)^{4},

the last equality again by claim 1 of Properties of Natural Number Powers in a Field.

Claim 3. Let U,WU,W and their representatives u,wu,w be as in the claim.

(a) By (a) of claim 1, u∈L6(Tn)u\in\mathcal{L}^{6}(\mathbb{T}^{n}). The real numbers r=3r=3 and s=2s=2 satisfy 0<30<3, 1≤21\le2 and 1≤61\le6, and rs=6rs=6; so claim 6 of Elementary Properties of the p-Seminorm, applied to the measurable map uu on (Q,BQ,λQ)(Q,\mathcal{B}_{Q},\lambda_{Q}), gives that the map ∣u∣3:y↦(∣u(y)∣)3|u|^{3}:y\mapsto(|u(y)|)^{3} is measurable and lies in L2(Tn)\mathcal{L}^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}).

(b) The pointwise cube u3u^{3} is measurable by claim 3 of Arithmetic of Measurable Real- and [0,∞]-Valued Maps, and for every y∈Qy\in Q

∣u3(y)∣=∣(u(y)u(y))u(y)∣=∣u(y)∣ ∣u(y)∣ ∣u(y)∣=(∣u(y)∣)3|u^{3}(y)|=\bigl|(u(y)u(y))u(y)\bigr|=|u(y)|\,|u(y)|\,|u(y)|=(|u(y)|)^{3}

by claim 1 of Properties of Natural Number Powers in a Field and two applications of claim 4 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field. Hence claim 3 of Elementary Properties of the p-Seminorm, applied with p=2p=2, with f=u3f=u^{3} and with g=∣u∣3g=|u|^{3}, gives u3∈L2(Tn)u^{3}\in\mathcal{L}^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}).

(c) If u′u' is any representative of UU, then u′=uu'=u almost everywhere by The Lebesgue Space Lᵖ(μ) (i), so (u′)3=u3(u')^{3}=u^{3} at every point where u′=uu'=u, hence almost everywhere; by (b) applied to u′u' and by the same clause, (u′)3∈L2(Tn)(u')^{3}\in\mathcal{L}^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) and [(u′)3]=[u3][(u')^{3}]=[u^{3}]. Thus [u3][u^{3}] does not depend on the representative.

(d) H1(Tn)H^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) is a subset of L2(Tn)L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) by The Sobolev Space of Once Weakly Differentiable Square-Integrable Classes on the Torus (i), so W∈L2(Tn)W\in L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) and its representative ww lies in L2(Tn)\mathcal{L}^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) with [w]=W[w]=W. The real numbers 22 and 22 are conjugate exponents, since 1<21<2 and 12+12=1\tfrac{1}{2}+\tfrac{1}{2}=1; hence Hölder's Inequality (i), applied with p=q=2p=q=2, f=u3f=u^{3} and g=wg=w, gives u3w∈L1(Tn)u^{3}w\in\mathcal{L}^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}).

(e) Finally L²(μ) Is a Real Hilbert Space (i), applied to the measure space (Q,BQ,λQ)(Q,\mathcal{B}_{Q},\lambda_{Q}) and to u3,w∈L2(Tn)u^{3},w\in\mathcal{L}^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}), gives

⟨[u3],W⟩L2=⟨[u3],[w]⟩L2=∫Tnu3w dx,\bigl\langle[u^{3}],W\bigr\rangle_{L^{2}}=\bigl\langle[u^{3}],[w]\bigr\rangle_{L^{2}}=\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}u^{3}w\,dx ,

which is claim 3.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…