TheoremBase

Composing the optimal map of the moving source with the coupling to the fixed source gives a nearly optimal composite displacement, so the composite-displacement lemma yields stability of the displacement in the source, and with the differentiability, tangency and Lipschitz continuity of half the squared distance this makes it an intrinsic test function.

Proof

Throughout, each result cited is universally quantified over the data appearing in its own statement and is applied to the data named here. Write Φ=Φν\Phi=\Phi_{\nu}. Integrals over Rd+d\mathbb{R}^{d+d} are formed in (Rd+d,B(Rd+d),γ)(\mathbb{R}^{d+d},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d+d}),\gamma) for the coupling γ\gamma at hand, as in Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §measures; by that clause a nonnegative Borel real function is integrated as a [0,∞][0,\infty]-valued map, and for a bounded one this integral is real and equals its integral as an integrable function by claim 6(c) of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space. Composites of Borel maps are Borel by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §borel-maps, and the square root is the nonnegative one of Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root. For nonnegative reals a,ba,b one has a≤ba\le b if and only if a2≤b2a^{2}\le b^{2} (and likewise with strict inequalities), because b2−a2=(b−a)(b+a)b^{2}-a^{2}=(b-a)(b+a) with b+a≥0b+a\ge0, and b+a=0b+a=0 forces a=b=0a=b=0; so the square root preserves the order of nonnegative reals, strict or not.

Preliminaries on WTW_{\mathbb{T}}. Let μ,μ′∈P(Td)\mu,\mu'\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}). (i) By Probability Measures on the Flat Torus, the Torus Cost of a Coupling, the Torus Wasserstein Distance and Optimal Couplings §cost every γ∈Π(μ,ν)\gamma\in\Pi(\mu,\nu) has 0≤IT(γ)≤d/40\le I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma)\le d/4, and Π(μ,ν)\Pi(\mu,\nu) is nonempty (preamble of Probability Measures on the Flat Torus, the Torus Cost of a Coupling, the Torus Wasserstein Distance and Optimal Couplings); since by Probability Measures on the Flat Torus, the Torus Cost of a Coupling, the Torus Wasserstein Distance and Optimal Couplings §distance WT(μ,ν)2W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu,\nu)^{2} is the greatest lower bound of these costs, WT(μ,ν)2≤d/4W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu,\nu)^{2}\le d/4 and 0≤WT(μ,ν)≤d/20\le W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu,\nu)\le\sqrt{d}/2. (ii) For the same reason, WT(μ,μ′)≤IT(γ)W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu,\mu')\le\sqrt{I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma)} for every γ∈Π(μ,μ′)\gamma\in\Pi(\mu,\mu'). (iii) WTW_{\mathbb{T}} is a metric on P(Td)\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) by The Torus Wasserstein Space is a Sequentially Compact Metric Space in which Optimal Couplings Exist §metric; its triangle inequality and symmetry give WT(μ,ν)≤WT(μ,μ′)+WT(μ′,ν)W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu,\nu)\le W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu,\mu')+W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu',\nu) and WT(μ′,ν)≤WT(μ,μ′)+WT(μ,ν)W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu',\nu)\le W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu,\mu')+W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu,\nu), hence, by claim 6 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field,

∣WT(μ,ν)−WT(μ′,ν)∣≤WT(μ,μ′).\bigl|W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu,\nu)-W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu',\nu)\bigr|\le W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu,\mu').

Step 1 (Clause 1: a composite displacement). Let μ,μn,T,Tn,γn\mu,\mu_{n},T,T_{n},\gamma_{n} be as in clause 1, write W=WT(μ,ν)W=W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu,\nu) and sn=IT(γn)s_{n}=\sqrt{I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma_{n})}. By Optimal Maps on the Torus, Uniquely Mapped Pairs and the Displacement Field of a Map §map, TT and TnT_{n} are Borel with T#μ=νT_{\#}\mu=\nu and (Tn)#μn=ν(T_{n})_{\#}\mu_{n}=\nu. By the preamble of Half the Squared Torus Wasserstein Distance to a Fixed Measure: the One-Sided Bound Along Couplings, Differentiability at an Absolutely Continuous Source, and the Tangent Gradient, vTv_{T} and vTnv_{T_{n}} are Borel with ∥vT∥,∥vTn∥≤d/2\lVert v_{T}\rVert,\lVert v_{T_{n}}\rVert\le\sqrt{d}/2, and their classes lie in L2(μ;Rd)L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d}) and L2(μn;Rd)L^{2}(\mu_{n};\mathbb{R}^{d}). Fix n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N} and define on Rd+d\mathbb{R}^{d+d}

X=pr2,Yn=Tn∘pr1,Zn(w)=vTn(pr1(w))−ϖ(pr2(w)−pr1(w)).X=\mathrm{pr}_{2},\qquad Y_{n}=T_{n}\circ\mathrm{pr}_{1},\qquad Z_{n}(w)=v_{T_{n}}(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w))-\varpi\bigl(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w)-\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w)\bigr).

These maps are Borel: the projections by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §projections, ϖ\varpi by The Flat Torus Distance: Minimality of the Wrapped Displacement, Periodicity, the Metric on the Unit Cell and the Lipschitz Bound §lipschitz, and differences of Borel maps into Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} because their components are differences of Borel real functions (claim 2 of The Borel Sigma-Algebra of a Euclidean Space as a Product, and Measurability of Projections, Sequentially Continuous Maps, and Open and Closed Sets and claim 2 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions). We check the hypotheses of Nearly Optimal Composite Displacements on the Torus Converge to the Optimal Displacement, used with q=d+dq=d+d, Σn=γn\Sigma_{n}=\gamma_{n}, Xn=XX_{n}=X, YnY_{n} and ZnZ_{n}.

(a) Marginals. As γn∈Π(μn,μ)\gamma_{n}\in\Pi(\mu_{n},\mu), Couplings of Two Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Their Quadratic Cost §coupling gives X#γn=μX_{\#}\gamma_{n}=\mu, and for B∈B(Rd)B\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d}), with Tn−1(B)∈B(Rd)T_{n}^{-1}(B)\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d}),

(Yn)#γn(B)=γn(pr1−1(Tn−1(B)))=μn(Tn−1(B))=(Tn)#μn(B)=ν(B),(Y_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{n}(B)=\gamma_{n}\bigl(\mathrm{pr}_{1}^{-1}(T_{n}^{-1}(B))\bigr)=\mu_{n}(T_{n}^{-1}(B))=(T_{n})_{\#}\mu_{n}(B)=\nu(B),

by the defining formula of the push-forward in Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §pushforward.

(b) Integer difference. Let w∈Rd+dw\in\mathbb{R}^{d+d}, x′=pr1(w)x'=\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w) and x=pr2(w)x=\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w). Since vTn(x′)=ϖ(Tn(x′)−x′)v_{T_{n}}(x')=\varpi(T_{n}(x')-x') by Optimal Maps on the Torus, Uniquely Mapped Pairs and the Displacement Field of a Map §displacement,

Yn(w)−X(w)−Zn(w)=[(Tn(x′)−x′)−ϖ(Tn(x′)−x′)]−[(x−x′)−ϖ(x−x′)],Y_{n}(w)-X(w)-Z_{n}(w)=\bigl[(T_{n}(x')-x')-\varpi(T_{n}(x')-x')\bigr]-\bigl[(x-x')-\varpi(x-x')\bigr],

and both brackets lie in Zd\mathbb{Z}^{d} by The Flat Torus Distance: Minimality of the Wrapped Displacement, Periodicity, the Metric on the Unit Cell and the Lipschitz Bound §range; so the difference lies in Zd\mathbb{Z}^{d}.

(c) The second moment of ZnZ_{n}. Write α(w)=vTn(pr1(w))\alpha(w)=v_{T_{n}}(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w)) and β(w)=ϖ(pr2(w)−pr1(w))\beta(w)=\varpi(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w)-\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w)). By claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n and claims 1, 3 and 5 of Bilinearity and Symmetry of the Dot Product on Rn\mathbb{R}^n,

∥Zn(w)∥2=∥α(w)∥2−2 α(w)⋅β(w)+∥β(w)∥2.\lVert Z_{n}(w)\rVert^{2}=\lVert\alpha(w)\rVert^{2}-2\,\alpha(w)\cdot\beta(w)+\lVert\beta(w)\rVert^{2}.

The three functions on the right are Borel by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §functions and bounded in absolute value by d/4d/4, by The Flat Torus Distance: Minimality of the Wrapped Displacement, Periodicity, the Metric on the Unit Cell and the Lipschitz Bound §range, the bound on vTnv_{T_{n}} and the inequality ∣a⋅b∣≤∥a∥ ∥b∥|a\cdot b|\le\lVert a\rVert\,\lVert b\rVert of Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §functions; so they are integrable (Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §measures) and ∥Zn∥2\lVert Z_{n}\rVert^{2} is bounded, whence ∫∥Zn∥2 dγn<∞\int\lVert Z_{n}\rVert^{2}\,d\gamma_{n}<\infty. By the change-of-variables formula with (pr1)#γn=μn(\mathrm{pr}_{1})_{\#}\gamma_{n}=\mu_{n} and Optimal Transport on the Flat Torus: Standing Notation §fields, ∫∥α∥2 dγn=∫∥vTn∥2 dμn=∥vTn∥μn2\int\lVert\alpha\rVert^{2}\,d\gamma_{n}=\int\lVert v_{T_{n}}\rVert^{2}\,d\mu_{n}=\lVert v_{T_{n}}\rVert_{\mu_{n}}^{2}. By The Torus Displacement Pairing of a Vector Field Along a Coupling §pairing, applied with μn\mu_{n} and μ\mu in the roles of μ\mu and ν\nu and with the Borel representative vTnv_{T_{n}}, ∫α⋅β dγn=JT(vTn,γn)\int\alpha\cdot\beta\,d\gamma_{n}=\mathcal{J}_{\mathbb{T}}(v_{T_{n}},\gamma_{n}). By The Wrapped Displacement and the Flat Torus Distance §distance, ∥β(w)∥=dT(pr1(w),pr2(w))\lVert\beta(w)\rVert=d_{\mathbb{T}}(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w),\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w)), so ∫∥β∥2 dγn=IT(γn)\int\lVert\beta\rVert^{2}\,d\gamma_{n}=I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma_{n}) by Probability Measures on the Flat Torus, the Torus Cost of a Coupling, the Torus Wasserstein Distance and Optimal Couplings §cost. Claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral and The Torus Displacement Pairing: Linearity, the Cost Bound, and Vanishing of a Field with First-Order Small Pairings §bound then give

∫Rd+d∥Zn∥2 dγn=∥vTn∥μn2−2 JT(vTn,γn)+sn2≤∥vTn∥μn2+2∥vTn∥μnsn+sn2=(∥vTn∥μn+sn)2.\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d+d}}\lVert Z_{n}\rVert^{2}\,d\gamma_{n}=\lVert v_{T_{n}}\rVert_{\mu_{n}}^{2}-2\,\mathcal{J}_{\mathbb{T}}(v_{T_{n}},\gamma_{n})+s_{n}^{2}\le\lVert v_{T_{n}}\rVert_{\mu_{n}}^{2}+2\lVert v_{T_{n}}\rVert_{\mu_{n}}s_{n}+s_{n}^{2}=\bigl(\lVert v_{T_{n}}\rVert_{\mu_{n}}+s_{n}\bigr)^{2}.

By Half the Squared Torus Wasserstein Distance to a Fixed Measure: the One-Sided Bound Along Couplings, Differentiability at an Absolutely Continuous Source, and the Tangent Gradient §upper, applied to μn\mu_{n} and TnT_{n}, 12WT(μn,ν)2=Φ(μn)=12∥vTn∥μn2\tfrac12W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu_{n},\nu)^{2}=\Phi(\mu_{n})=\tfrac12\lVert v_{T_{n}}\rVert_{\mu_{n}}^{2}; both WT(μn,ν)W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu_{n},\nu) and ∥vTn∥μn\lVert v_{T_{n}}\rVert_{\mu_{n}} are nonnegative, so they are equal by the uniqueness in Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root. By Preliminary (iii), applied to μn\mu_{n} and μ\mu, and Preliminary (ii), applied to γn∈Π(μn,μ)\gamma_{n}\in\Pi(\mu_{n},\mu), WT(μn,ν)≤W+WT(μn,μ)≤W+snW_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu_{n},\nu)\le W+W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu_{n},\mu)\le W+s_{n}. Hence, as all quantities are nonnegative,

∫Rd+d∥Zn∥2 dγn≤(W+2sn)2=W2+4Wsn+4sn2.(1)\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d+d}}\lVert Z_{n}\rVert^{2}\,d\gamma_{n}\le(W+2s_{n})^{2}=W^{2}+4Ws_{n}+4s_{n}^{2}. \tag{1}

(d) Near optimality. Let ε\varepsilon be a positive real number and let δ\delta be the smaller of 11 and ε/(2d+4)\varepsilon/(2\sqrt{d}+4), a positive real. As (IT(γn))n(I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma_{n}))_{n} converges to 00, Limit of a Sequence of Real Numbers, used with δ2\delta^{2}, gives N∈NN\in\mathbb{N} with IT(γn)<δ2I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma_{n})<\delta^{2}, hence 0≤sn<δ≤10\le s_{n}<\delta\le1, for every n≥Nn\ge N. For such nn, sn2≤sns_{n}^{2}\le s_{n} and W≤d/2W\le\sqrt{d}/2 (Preliminary (i)), so (1)(1) gives

∫Rd+d∥Zn∥2 dγn≤W2+(2d+4) sn≤W2+(2d+4) δ≤W2+ε.\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d+d}}\lVert Z_{n}\rVert^{2}\,d\gamma_{n}\le W^{2}+(2\sqrt{d}+4)\,s_{n}\le W^{2}+(2\sqrt{d}+4)\,\delta\le W^{2}+\varepsilon .

The order of choice is ε\varepsilon, then δ\delta, then NN.

By (a)-(d), Nearly Optimal Composite Displacements on the Torus Converge to the Optimal Displacement §convergence applies (μ\mu being absolutely continuous and TT an optimal map from μ\mu to ν\nu): the sequence cn=∫∥Zn−vT∘pr2∥2 dγnc_{n}=\int\lVert Z_{n}-v_{T}\circ\mathrm{pr}_{2}\rVert^{2}\,d\gamma_{n} converges to 00.

Step 2 (Clause 1: conclusion). For w∈Rd+dw\in\mathbb{R}^{d+d} we have vTn(pr1(w))−vT(pr2(w))=(Zn(w)−vT(pr2(w)))+β(w)v_{T_{n}}(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w))-v_{T}(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w))=\bigl(Z_{n}(w)-v_{T}(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w))\bigr)+\beta(w), with β\beta as in Step 1(c). The first inequality of Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §functions, applied to Zn(w)−vT(pr2(w))Z_{n}(w)-v_{T}(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w)) and −β(w)-\beta(w), whose norm is ∥β(w)∥=dT(pr1(w),pr2(w))\lVert\beta(w)\rVert=d_{\mathbb{T}}(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w),\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w)) by claim 5 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, gives

∥vTn(pr1(w))−vT(pr2(w))∥2≤2∥Zn(w)−vT(pr2(w))∥2+2 dT(pr1(w),pr2(w))2.\bigl\lVert v_{T_{n}}(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w))-v_{T}(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w))\bigr\rVert^{2}\le2\bigl\lVert Z_{n}(w)-v_{T}(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w))\bigr\rVert^{2}+2\,d_{\mathbb{T}}\bigl(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w),\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w)\bigr)^{2}.

All functions here are nonnegative and Borel (Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §functions and The Flat Torus Distance: Minimality of the Wrapped Displacement, Periodicity, the Metric on the Unit Cell and the Lipschitz Bound §lipschitz). Integrating against γn\gamma_{n} with claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral,

0≤en:=∫Rd+d∥vTn(pr1(w))−vT(pr2(w))∥2 γn(dw)≤2cn+2IT(γn).0\le e_{n}:=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d+d}}\bigl\lVert v_{T_{n}}(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w))-v_{T}(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w))\bigr\rVert^{2}\,\gamma_{n}(dw)\le2c_{n}+2I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma_{n}).

Given a positive real ε\varepsilon, choose N1N_{1} with cn<ε/4c_{n}<\varepsilon/4 for n≥N1n\ge N_{1} (Step 1) and N2N_{2} with IT(γn)<ε/4I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma_{n})<\varepsilon/4 for n≥N2n\ge N_{2} (hypothesis), and let NN be the larger; then ∣en−0∣<ε|e_{n}-0|<\varepsilon for n≥Nn\ge N. By Limit of a Sequence of Real Numbers, (en)n∈N(e_{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}} converges to 00, which is clause 1.

Step 3 (Clause 2, property (a): continuity). Let μ,μ′∈P(Td)\mu,\mu'\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) and write W1=WT(μ,ν)W_{1}=W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu,\nu), W2=WT(μ′,ν)W_{2}=W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu',\nu). Then W12−W22=(W1−W2)(W1+W2)W_{1}^{2}-W_{2}^{2}=(W_{1}-W_{2})(W_{1}+W_{2}), and by claim 4 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, Preliminaries (i) and (iii),

∣Φ(μ′)−Φ(μ)∣=12∣W1−W2∣ (W1+W2)≤12WT(μ,μ′)⋅d.|\Phi(\mu')-\Phi(\mu)|=\tfrac12|W_{1}-W_{2}|\,(W_{1}+W_{2})\le\tfrac12W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu,\mu')\cdot\sqrt{d}.

Let ε\varepsilon be a positive real and put δ=ε/d\delta=\varepsilon/\sqrt{d}, positive since d≥1d\ge1. If WT(μ,μ′)<δW_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu,\mu')<\delta, then ∣Φ(μ′)−Φ(μ)∣≤d2WT(μ,μ′)<ε2<ε|\Phi(\mu')-\Phi(\mu)|\le\tfrac{\sqrt{d}}{2}W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu,\mu')<\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}<\varepsilon. As μ\mu was arbitrary, Φ\Phi is continuous on P(Td)\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) from (P(Td),WT)(\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}),W_{\mathbb{T}}) to R\mathbb{R} with the absolute-value metric, which is Intrinsic Test Functions on the Torus Wasserstein Space §continuity.

Step 4 (Clause 2, property (b) and the gradient). Let μ∈Pac(Td)\mu\in\mathcal{P}^{\mathrm{ac}}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) and let TT be any optimal map from μ\mu to ν\nu. By Half the Squared Torus Wasserstein Distance to a Fixed Measure: the One-Sided Bound Along Couplings, Differentiability at an Absolutely Continuous Source, and the Tangent Gradient §differentiable, Φ\Phi is differentiable along couplings at μ\mu with ∇Φ(μ)=−vT\nabla\Phi(\mu)=-v_{T}, which is the asserted formula for the gradient. By Half the Squared Torus Wasserstein Distance to a Fixed Measure: the One-Sided Bound Along Couplings, Differentiability at an Absolutely Continuous Source, and the Tangent Gradient §tangent the class of vTv_{T} lies in TμT_{\mu}, which is a linear subspace of L2(μ;Rd)L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d}) by The Torus Tangent Space: Linearity of the Periodic Calculus, Closed Subspace, and Representation of Bounded Functionals on Gradients §subspace; so the class of −vT-v_{T}, its product with the scalar −1-1, lies in TμT_{\mu}. This is Intrinsic Test Functions on the Torus Wasserstein Space §differentiability for K=Pac(Td)\mathcal{K}=\mathcal{P}^{\mathrm{ac}}(\mathbb{T}^{d}).

Step 5 (Clause 2, property (c)). Let μ∈Pac(Td)\mu\in\mathcal{P}^{\mathrm{ac}}(\mathbb{T}^{d}), let (μn)n∈N(\mu_{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}} be a sequence in Pac(Td)\mathcal{P}^{\mathrm{ac}}(\mathbb{T}^{d}), and let γn∈Π(μn,μ)\gamma_{n}\in\Pi(\mu_{n},\mu) be such that (IT(γn))n(I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma_{n}))_{n} converges to 00. By McCann's Theorem on the Flat Torus: Optimal Couplings out of an Absolutely Continuous Measure are Induced by a Unique Map with a Periodic Potential §map choose an optimal map TT from μ\mu to ν\nu and, for each n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}, an optimal map TnT_{n} from μn\mu_{n} to ν\nu. By Step 4, ∇Φ(μ)=−vT\nabla\Phi(\mu)=-v_{T} and ∇Φ(μn)=−vTn\nabla\Phi(\mu_{n})=-v_{T_{n}}. The terms of the sequence in Intrinsic Test Functions on the Torus Wasserstein Space §gradient-continuity do not depend on the representatives chosen, as recorded there; with the Borel representatives −vTn-v_{T_{n}} and −vT-v_{T} and claim 5 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n (with λ=−1\lambda=-1), the nnth term is

∫Rd+d∥−vTn(pr1(w))+vT(pr2(w))∥2 γn(dw)=∫Rd+d∥vTn(pr1(w))−vT(pr2(w))∥2 γn(dw),\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d+d}}\bigl\lVert-v_{T_{n}}(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w))+v_{T}(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w))\bigr\rVert^{2}\,\gamma_{n}(dw)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d+d}}\bigl\lVert v_{T_{n}}(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w))-v_{T}(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w))\bigr\rVert^{2}\,\gamma_{n}(dw),

and this sequence converges to 00 by clause 1, applied to μ\mu, μn\mu_{n}, TT, TnT_{n} and γn\gamma_{n}. This is Intrinsic Test Functions on the Torus Wasserstein Space §gradient-continuity.

By Steps 3, 4 and 5, Φ\Phi has the three properties of Intrinsic Test Functions on the Torus Wasserstein Space §test on K=Pac(Td)\mathcal{K}=\mathcal{P}^{\mathrm{ac}}(\mathbb{T}^{d}), which is clause 2.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…