TheoremBase

Proof of Basic Properties of the Tangent Space: Closed Subspace, the Identity Map Belongs to It, Second-Moment Limits, and Representation of Bounded Functionals on Gradients

lemmalem:tangent-space-wasserstein-basic-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 14,471 chars · 45 deps · depth 26 Reason: Goal 3C Batch B: proof of lem:tangent-space-wasserstein-basic-2026a.

Gradients of test functions form a linear subspace, so their closure is a closed subspace in which they are dense; the gradients of the second-moment test functions converge to the identity by dominated convergence, and their Laplacians integrate to d in the limit. A bounded functional on gradients extends to the tangent space, is composed with the orthogonal projection, and is represented by Riesz; the representative lies in the double orthogonal complement and is unique by density.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. Write H=L2(μ;Rd)H=L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d}), a real Hilbert space by Square-Integrable Vector Fields Against a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space, and Test Functions: Standing Notation §l2mu, with inner product ,μ\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle_{\mu}, norm μ\lVert\cdot\rVert_{\mu} and distance dμ(ξ,η)=ξημd_{\mu}(\xi,\eta)=\lVert\xi-\eta\rVert_{\mu} (Real Inner Product Space §distance); the notation of Real Hilbert Spaces: Standing Notation and Background is in force for HH, in particular convergence of sequences in HH is convergence in (H,dμ)(H,d_{\mu}), closure is that of Real Hilbert Space §topology, and The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity, Nearest-Point Projection onto a Nonempty Closed Convex Subset of a Real Hilbert Space, Orthogonal Projection onto a Closed Linear Subspace of a Real Hilbert Space and The Riesz Representation Theorem for a Real Hilbert Space are in force by Real Hilbert Spaces: Standing Notation and Background §background. By Sequential Characterization of the Closure in a Metric Space, a point of HH lies in A\overline{A} exactly when it is the limit of a sequence in AA. Operations on classes are formed on representatives (The Space of Square-Integrable Random Vectors §classes), so an identity between maps that holds pointwise on Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} holds between their classes. The natural number nn is read as a real number through the canonical map of The Canonical Map from the Natural Numbers to a Field, which is strictly increasing by claim 6 and takes positive values by claim 3 of Properties of the Canonical Map from the Natural Numbers to an Ordered Field, so that ψR\psi_{R} is defined for R=nR=n; each ψn\psi_{n} is a test function, as recorded in the statement.

Step 1: claim 1. The zero map is a test function whose gradient is the zero map, by The Gradient of a Test Function is Bounded and Square-Integrable, and Its Laplacian Bounded and Integrable, Against Every Probability Measure §linear with a=b=0a=b=0; its class is the zero vector of HH. For ψ,ϕCc(Rd)\psi,\phi\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) and a,bRa,b\in\mathbb{R}, the same claim gives aψ+bϕ=(aψ+bϕ)a\nabla\psi+b\nabla\phi=\nabla(a\psi+b\phi) with aψ+bϕa\psi+b\phi a test function, so GμG_{\mu} contains the zero vector and is closed under sums and scalar multiples: it is a linear subspace of HH. By claims 1 and 2 of The Closure is the Smallest Closed Superset, Tμ=GμT_{\mu}=\overline{G_{\mu}} contains GμG_{\mu} and is closed. It is a linear subspace: it contains the zero vector, and if ξ,ηTμ\xi,\eta\in T_{\mu} and a,bRa,b\in\mathbb{R}, choose sequences (gm)(g_{m}), (hm)(h_{m}) in GμG_{\mu} converging to ξ\xi and η\eta; then agm+bhmGμag_{m}+bh_{m}\in G_{\mu} and agm+bhmaξ+bηag_{m}+bh_{m}\to a\xi+b\eta by The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity §linear-limits, so aξ+bηTμa\xi+b\eta\in T_{\mu}. Hence TμT_{\mu} is a closed linear subspace. Finally, (Tμ,dμ)(T_{\mu},d_{\mu}) is a metric space by Real Hilbert Spaces: Standing Notation and Background §topology, and every ξTμ\xi\in T_{\mu} is the limit in (H,dμ)(H,d_{\mu}) of a sequence in GμG_{\mu}, which is then also its limit in (Tμ,dμ)(T_{\mu},d_{\mu}) (the distances are the same numbers); by Sequential Characterization of the Closure in a Metric Space applied in (Tμ,dμ)(T_{\mu},d_{\mu}), ξ\xi lies in the closure of GμG_{\mu} in that space, so this closure is TμT_{\mu}, that is, GμG_{\mu} is dense in (Tμ,dμ)(T_{\mu},d_{\mu}).

Step 2: claim 2. The identity map is continuous from (Rd,dE)(\mathbb{R}^{d},d_{E}) to itself (take δ=ε\delta=\varepsilon in Continuous Map Between Metric Spaces), hence Borel by claim 3 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space and Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §spaces. The function xid(x)2=x2x\mapsto\lVert\mathrm{id}(x)\rVert^{2}=\lVert x\rVert^{2} is the nonnegative Borel function of Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §pairs, whose integral is M2(μ)<M_{2}(\mu)<\infty by The Second Moment of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space and the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment §moment and The Second Moment of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space and the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment §space; as its negative part is zero, it is integrable with integral M2(μ)M_{2}(\mu) by Integrable Function and the Lebesgue Integral. Thus id\mathrm{id} is a square-integrable random vector on (Rd,B(Rd),μ)(\mathbb{R}^{d},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d}),\mu) in the sense of The Space of Square-Integrable Random Vectors §space, and its class lies in HH.

Let MM be the constant of Scaled Cutoffs and the Second-Moment Test Functions: Uniform Derivative Bounds and Agreement on a Ball §test for the chosen χ\chi. For nNn\in\mathbb{N} and xRdx\in\mathbb{R}^{d} put fn(x)=ψn(x)x2f_{n}(x)=\lVert\nabla\psi_{n}(x)-x\rVert^{2}. Since ψn\nabla\psi_{n} and id\mathrm{id} are square-integrable random vectors on (Rd,B(Rd),μ)(\mathbb{R}^{d},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d}),\mu), so is their pointwise difference ψnid\nabla\psi_{n}-\mathrm{id} (The Space of Square-Integrable Random Vectors §space), which is therefore Borel, and fn=ψnid2f_{n}=\lVert\nabla\psi_{n}-\mathrm{id}\rVert^{2} is the random variable of Basic Properties of Random Vectors: Coordinates, Borel Images and Arithmetic, Change of Variables, Almost Sure Equality and Pairs §composition, hence Borel; also 0fn(x)0\le f_{n}(x) for every xx by claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n and claim 2 of Nonnegativity of Squares in an Ordered Field, so fn(x)=fn(x)|f_{n}(x)|=f_{n}(x). For every i[d]i\in[d], iψn(x)xiiψn(x)+xiMx+x|\partial_{i}\psi_{n}(x)-x_{i}|\le|\partial_{i}\psi_{n}(x)|+|x_{i}|\le M\lVert x\rVert+\lVert x\rVert by claim 5 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, Scaled Cutoffs and the Second-Moment Test Functions: Uniform Derivative Bounds and Agreement on a Ball §test and claim 4 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, so by claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field and claim 1 of Comparison and Absolute Value Bounds for Finite Sums of Real Numbers,

fn(x)=i=1d(iψn(x)xi)2i=1d(M+1)2x2=d(M+1)2x2=:g(x),f_{n}(x)=\sum_{i=1}^{d}\bigl(\partial_{i}\psi_{n}(x)-x_{i}\bigr)^{2}\le\sum_{i=1}^{d}(M+1)^{2}\lVert x\rVert^{2}=d\,(M+1)^{2}\lVert x\rVert^{2}=:g(x),

the last equality by claim 3 of Properties of Finite Sums and The Canonical Map from the Natural Numbers to a Field; gg is integrable, being a scalar multiple of the integrable function x2\lVert x\rVert^{2} (claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral). Fix xx. By claim 1 of The Archimedean Property of the Real Numbers there is n0Nn_{0}\in\mathbb{N} with x<n0\lVert x\rVert<n_{0}, and for nn0n\ge n_{0} we have n0nn_{0}\le n as real numbers, so x<n\lVert x\rVert<n (claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field) and, by Scaled Cutoffs and the Second-Moment Test Functions: Uniform Derivative Bounds and Agreement on a Ball §ball, iψn(x)=xi\partial_{i}\psi_{n}(x)=x_{i} for every ii, whence fn(x)=0f_{n}(x)=0. Thus fn(x)0f_{n}(x)\to0 for every xx, and claim 3 of Dominated Convergence Theorem gives RdfndμRd0dμ=0\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}f_{n}\,d\mu\to\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}0\,d\mu=0 (the integral of the zero function vanishing by claim 6(a) of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space), that is, ψnidμ20\lVert\nabla\psi_{n}-\mathrm{id}\rVert_{\mu}^{2}\to0, the integral of the nonnegative function fnf_{n} in the sense of Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §measures agreeing with its integral as an integrable function by claim 6(c) of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space. Given ε>0\varepsilon>0, eventually ψnidμ2<ε2\lVert\nabla\psi_{n}-\mathrm{id}\rVert_{\mu}^{2}<\varepsilon^{2}, hence ψnidμ<ε\lVert\nabla\psi_{n}-\mathrm{id}\rVert_{\mu}<\varepsilon by claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field; so ψnidμ0\lVert\nabla\psi_{n}-\mathrm{id}\rVert_{\mu}\to0, which says that ψnid\nabla\psi_{n}\to\mathrm{id} in (H,dμ)(H,d_{\mu}). Since each ψnGμ\nabla\psi_{n}\in G_{\mu}, Sequential Characterization of the Closure in a Metric Space gives idGμ=Tμ\mathrm{id}\in\overline{G_{\mu}}=T_{\mu}.

Step 3: claim 3. By Scaled Cutoffs and the Second-Moment Test Functions: Uniform Derivative Bounds and Agreement on a Ball §test, Δψn(x)dM|\Delta\psi_{n}(x)|\le dM for all nn and xx, and the constant dMdM is integrable with respect to μ\mu with dMdμ=dMμ(Rd)=dM\int dM\,d\mu=dM\,\mu(\mathbb{R}^{d})=dM by claim 6(a) of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space and μ(Rd)=1\mu(\mathbb{R}^{d})=1 (Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §measures); each Δψn\Delta\psi_{n} is Borel by The Gradient of a Test Function is Bounded and Square-Integrable, and Its Laplacian Bounded and Integrable, Against Every Probability Measure §laplacian. For fixed xx and nn0n\ge n_{0} as in Step 2, Δψn(x)=d\Delta\psi_{n}(x)=d by Scaled Cutoffs and the Second-Moment Test Functions: Uniform Derivative Bounds and Agreement on a Ball §ball, so Δψn(x)d\Delta\psi_{n}(x)\to d. By claim 3 of Dominated Convergence Theorem, Δψndμddμ=dμ(Rd)=d\int\Delta\psi_{n}\,d\mu\to\int d\,d\mu=d\,\mu(\mathbb{R}^{d})=d, the constant integral again by claim 6(a) of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space.

Step 4: claim 4. (a) The functional on GμG_{\mu}. For gGμg\in G_{\mu} choose ψCc(Rd)\psi\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) with g=ψg=\nabla\psi and put ~(g)=(ψ)\tilde\ell(g)=\ell(\psi). This does not depend on the choice: if also g=ϕg=\nabla\phi, then (ψϕ)=ψϕ\nabla(\psi-\phi)=\nabla\psi-\nabla\phi (The Gradient of a Test Function is Bounded and Square-Integrable, and Its Laplacian Bounded and Integrable, Against Every Probability Measure §linear) is the zero vector of HH, whose norm is 00 by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space §zero, so (ψ)(ϕ)=(ψϕ)C(ψϕ)μ=0|\ell(\psi)-\ell(\phi)|=|\ell(\psi-\phi)|\le C\lVert\nabla(\psi-\phi)\rVert_{\mu}=0 and (ψ)=(ϕ)\ell(\psi)=\ell(\phi) by claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field. For g=ψg=\nabla\psi, h=ϕh=\nabla\phi in GμG_{\mu} and a,bRa,b\in\mathbb{R}, ag+bh=(aψ+bϕ)ag+bh=\nabla(a\psi+b\phi) gives ~(ag+bh)=a~(g)+b~(h)\tilde\ell(ag+bh)=a\tilde\ell(g)+b\tilde\ell(h), and ~(g)Cgμ|\tilde\ell(g)|\le C\lVert g\rVert_{\mu}. Consequently ~(g)~(h)=~(gh)Cdμ(g,h)|\tilde\ell(g)-\tilde\ell(h)|=|\tilde\ell(g-h)|\le C\,d_{\mu}(g,h), so ~\tilde\ell is Lipschitz with constant CC from (Gμ,dμ)(G_{\mu},d_{\mu}) to (R,dR)(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}), hence uniformly continuous on GμG_{\mu} by A Lipschitz Map is Uniformly Continuous.

(b) Extension to TμT_{\mu}. By Step 1, GμG_{\mu} is nonempty and dense in the metric space (Tμ,dμ)(T_{\mu},d_{\mu}), so Extension of a Uniformly Continuous Real Function from a Dense Subset §existence yields L:TμRL:T_{\mu}\to\mathbb{R}, continuous on TμT_{\mu}, with L(g)=~(g)L(g)=\tilde\ell(g) for gGμg\in G_{\mu}. Continuity on (Tμ,dμ)(T_{\mu},d_{\mu}) is sequential continuity by Continuity Between Metric Spaces is Equivalent to Sequential Continuity §on-subset. Let ξ,ηTμ\xi,\eta\in T_{\mu}, a,bRa,b\in\mathbb{R}, and choose sequences (gm)(g_{m}), (hm)(h_{m}) in GμG_{\mu} with gmξg_{m}\to\xi, hmηh_{m}\to\eta in HH, hence in (Tμ,dμ)(T_{\mu},d_{\mu}). Then agm+bhmaξ+bηag_{m}+bh_{m}\to a\xi+b\eta (The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity §linear-limits), so L(aξ+bη)=limmL(agm+bhm)=limm(aL(gm)+bL(hm))=aL(ξ)+bL(η)L(a\xi+b\eta)=\lim_{m}L(ag_{m}+bh_{m})=\lim_{m}\bigl(aL(g_{m})+bL(h_{m})\bigr)=aL(\xi)+bL(\eta) by claims 3 and 1 of Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences; and L(ξ)=limmL(gm)limmCgmμ=Cξμ|L(\xi)|=\lim_{m}|L(g_{m})|\le\lim_{m}C\lVert g_{m}\rVert_{\mu}=C\lVert\xi\rVert_{\mu}, using claim 4 of Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences for L(gm)L(ξ)|L(g_{m})|\to|L(\xi)|, The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity §continuity for gmμξμ\lVert g_{m}\rVert_{\mu}\to\lVert\xi\rVert_{\mu}, claim 3 of Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences for CgmμCξμC\lVert g_{m}\rVert_{\mu}\to C\lVert\xi\rVert_{\mu}, and claim 1 of Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences.

(c) Riesz representation. Let P=PTμP=P_{T_{\mu}} be the orthogonal projection onto the closed linear subspace TμT_{\mu} (Square-Integrable Vector Fields Against a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space, and Test Functions: Standing Notation §l2mu), which satisfies PζTμP\zeta\in T_{\mu} for every ζH\zeta\in H (Nearest-Point Projection onto a Nonempty Closed Convex Subset of a Real Hilbert Space §existence), is linear with Pζ=ζP\zeta=\zeta for ζTμ\zeta\in T_{\mu} (Orthogonal Projection onto a Closed Linear Subspace of a Real Hilbert Space §linear), and satisfies Pζμζμ\lVert P\zeta\rVert_{\mu}\le\lVert\zeta\rVert_{\mu} (Orthogonal Projection onto a Closed Linear Subspace of a Real Hilbert Space §pythagoras). Define ^:HR\hat\ell:H\to\mathbb{R} by ^(ζ)=L(Pζ)\hat\ell(\zeta)=L(P\zeta). It is linear, as a composition of linear maps, and ^(ζ)CPζμCζμ|\hat\ell(\zeta)|\le C\lVert P\zeta\rVert_{\mu}\le C\lVert\zeta\rVert_{\mu}, so ^\hat\ell is a bounded linear functional on HH. By The Riesz Representation Theorem for a Real Hilbert Space §existence there is ξH\xi\in H with ^(ζ)=ζ,ξμ\hat\ell(\zeta)=\langle\zeta,\xi\rangle_{\mu} for every ζH\zeta\in H. If ζTμ\zeta\in T_{\mu}^{\perp} (Orthogonality, Orthogonal Complement and Orthonormal Families in a Real Inner Product Space §complement), then PζP\zeta is the zero vector by Orthogonal Projection onto a Closed Linear Subspace of a Real Hilbert Space §characterisation (the zero vector lies in TμT_{\mu} and ζ0Tμ\zeta-0\in T_{\mu}^{\perp}), so ζ,ξμ=L(0)=0\langle\zeta,\xi\rangle_{\mu}=L(0)=0 (LL is linear), hence ξ,ζμ=0\langle\xi,\zeta\rangle_{\mu}=0 by the symmetry of the inner product (Real Inner Product Space §inner-product); as ζTμ\zeta\in T_{\mu}^{\perp} was arbitrary, ξ(Tμ)=Tμ\xi\in(T_{\mu}^{\perp})^{\perp}=T_{\mu} by Orthogonal Projection onto a Closed Linear Subspace of a Real Hilbert Space §complement. For ψCc(Rd)\psi\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}^{d}), since ψTμ\nabla\psi\in T_{\mu}, ξ,ψμ=ψ,ξμ=^(ψ)=L(ψ)=~(ψ)=(ψ)\langle\xi,\nabla\psi\rangle_{\mu}=\langle\nabla\psi,\xi\rangle_{\mu}=\hat\ell(\nabla\psi)=L(\nabla\psi)=\tilde\ell(\nabla\psi)=\ell(\psi), the symmetry of the inner product being part of Real Inner Product Space §inner-product. Moreover ξμ2=ξ,ξμ=^(ξ)Cξμ\lVert\xi\rVert_{\mu}^{2}=\langle\xi,\xi\rangle_{\mu}=\hat\ell(\xi)\le C\lVert\xi\rVert_{\mu} (Real Inner Product Space §norm); if ξμ>0\lVert\xi\rVert_{\mu}>0, multiplying by its inverse (positive by claim 7 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field; claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field) gives ξμC\lVert\xi\rVert_{\mu}\le C, and otherwise ξμ=0C\lVert\xi\rVert_{\mu}=0\le C.

(d) Uniqueness. Let ξTμ\xi'\in T_{\mu} also satisfy ξ,ψμ=(ψ)\langle\xi',\nabla\psi\rangle_{\mu}=\ell(\psi) for every ψ\psi, and put ζ=ξξTμ\zeta=\xi-\xi'\in T_{\mu} (Step 1). Then ζ,gμ=0\langle\zeta,g\rangle_{\mu}=0 for every gGμg\in G_{\mu} by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space §bilinear. Choose a sequence (gm)(g_{m}) in GμG_{\mu} with gmζg_{m}\to\zeta; then ζμ2=ζ,ζμ=limmζ,gmμ=0\lVert\zeta\rVert_{\mu}^{2}=\langle\zeta,\zeta\rangle_{\mu}=\lim_{m}\langle\zeta,g_{m}\rangle_{\mu}=0 by Real Inner Product Space §norm and The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity §continuity, so ζμ=0\lVert\zeta\rVert_{\mu}=0 and ζ\zeta is the zero vector by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space §vanishing, that is, ξ=ξ\xi'=\xi.

Step 5: claim 5. By Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space §bilinear, ηξ,ψμ=(ψ)(ψ)=0\langle\eta-\xi,\nabla\psi\rangle_{\mu}=\ell(\psi)-\ell(\psi)=0 for every ψ\psi, so ηξ\eta-\xi is orthogonal to every element of GμG_{\mu}, and, by the limit argument of Step 4(d), to every element of TμT_{\mu}: ηξTμ\eta-\xi\in T_{\mu}^{\perp}. Since ξTμ\xi\in T_{\mu}, Orthogonal Projection onto a Closed Linear Subspace of a Real Hilbert Space §characterisation gives ξ=PTμη\xi=P_{T_{\mu}}\eta, and Orthogonal Projection onto a Closed Linear Subspace of a Real Hilbert Space §pythagoras gives ξμημ\lVert\xi\rVert_{\mu}\le\lVert\eta\rVert_{\mu}. If ηTμ\eta\in T_{\mu}, then PTμη=ηP_{T_{\mu}}\eta=\eta by Orthogonal Projection onto a Closed Linear Subspace of a Real Hilbert Space §linear, so ξ=η\xi=\eta.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Comments

Loading…