TheoremBase

Gradients of test functions form a linear subspace, so their closure is a closed subspace in which they are dense; the gradients of the second-moment test functions converge to the identity by dominated convergence, and their Laplacians integrate to d in the limit. A bounded functional on gradients extends to the tangent space, is composed with the orthogonal projection, and is represented by Riesz; the representative lies in the double orthogonal complement and is unique by density.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. Write H=L2(μ;Rd)H=L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d}), a real Hilbert space by Square-Integrable Vector Fields Against a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space, and Test Functions: Standing Notation (ii), with inner product ⟨⋅,⋅⟩μ\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle_{\mu}, norm ∥⋅∥μ\lVert\cdot\rVert_{\mu} and distance dμ(ξ,η)=∥ξ−η∥μd_{\mu}(\xi,\eta)=\lVert\xi-\eta\rVert_{\mu} (Real Inner Product Spaces (iii)); the notation of Real Hilbert Spaces: Standing Notation and Background is in force for HH, in particular convergence of sequences in HH is convergence in (H,dμ)(H,d_{\mu}), closure is that of Real Hilbert Spaces (ii), and The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity, Nearest-Point Projection onto a Nonempty Closed Convex Subset of a Real Hilbert Space, Orthogonal Projection onto a Closed Linear Subspace of a Real Hilbert Space and The Riesz Representation Theorem for a Real Hilbert Space are in force by Real Hilbert Spaces: Standing Notation and Background (xi). By Sequential Characterization of the Closure in a Metric Space, a point of HH lies in A‾\overline{A} exactly when it is the limit of a sequence in AA. Operations on classes are formed on representatives (The Space of Square-Integrable Random Vectors (ii)), so an identity between maps that holds pointwise on Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} holds between their classes. The natural number nn is read as a real number through the canonical map of The Canonical Map from the Natural Numbers to a Field, which is strictly increasing by claim 6 and takes positive values by claim 3 of Properties of the Canonical Map from the Natural Numbers to an Ordered Field, so that ψR\psi_{R} is defined for R=nR=n; each ψn\psi_{n} is a test function, as recorded in the statement.

Step 1: claim 1. The zero map is a test function whose gradient is the zero map, by The Gradient of a Test Function is Bounded and Square-Integrable, and Its Laplacian Bounded and Integrable, Against Every Probability Measure (iii) with a=b=0a=b=0; its class is the zero vector of HH. For ψ,ϕ∈Cc∞(Rd)\psi,\phi\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) and a,b∈Ra,b\in\mathbb{R}, the same claim gives a∇ψ+b∇ϕ=∇(aψ+bϕ)a\nabla\psi+b\nabla\phi=\nabla(a\psi+b\phi) with aψ+bϕa\psi+b\phi a test function, so GμG_{\mu} contains the zero vector and is closed under sums and scalar multiples: it is a linear subspace of HH. By claims 1 and 2 of The Closure is the Smallest Closed Superset, Tμ=Gμ‾T_{\mu}=\overline{G_{\mu}} contains GμG_{\mu} and is closed. It is a linear subspace: it contains the zero vector, and if ξ,η∈Tμ\xi,\eta\in T_{\mu} and a,b∈Ra,b\in\mathbb{R}, choose sequences (gm)(g_{m}), (hm)(h_{m}) in GμG_{\mu} converging to ξ\xi and η\eta; then agm+bhm∈Gμag_{m}+bh_{m}\in G_{\mu} and agm+bhm→aξ+bηag_{m}+bh_{m}\to a\xi+b\eta by The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity (iv), so aξ+bη∈Tμa\xi+b\eta\in T_{\mu}. Hence TμT_{\mu} is a closed linear subspace. Finally, (Tμ,dμ)(T_{\mu},d_{\mu}) is a metric space by Real Hilbert Spaces: Standing Notation and Background (iii), and every ξ∈Tμ\xi\in T_{\mu} is the limit in (H,dμ)(H,d_{\mu}) of a sequence in GμG_{\mu}, which is then also its limit in (Tμ,dμ)(T_{\mu},d_{\mu}) (the distances are the same numbers); by Sequential Characterization of the Closure in a Metric Space applied in (Tμ,dμ)(T_{\mu},d_{\mu}), ξ\xi lies in the closure of GμG_{\mu} in that space, so this closure is TμT_{\mu}, that is, GμG_{\mu} is dense in (Tμ,dμ)(T_{\mu},d_{\mu}).

Step 2: claim 2. The identity map is continuous from (Rd,dE)(\mathbb{R}^{d},d_{E}) to itself (take δ=ε\delta=\varepsilon in Continuous Map Between Metric Spaces), hence Borel by claim 3 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space and Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation (i). The function x↦∥id(x)∥2=∥x∥2x\mapsto\lVert\mathrm{id}(x)\rVert^{2}=\lVert x\rVert^{2} is the nonnegative Borel function of Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation (v), whose integral is M2(μ)<∞M_{2}(\mu)<\infty by The Second Moment of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space and the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment (i) and The Second Moment of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space and the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment (ii); as its negative part is zero, it is integrable with integral M2(μ)M_{2}(\mu) by Integrable Functions and Their Lebesgue Integral. Thus id\mathrm{id} is a square-integrable random vector on (Rd,B(Rd),μ)(\mathbb{R}^{d},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d}),\mu) in the sense of The Space of Square-Integrable Random Vectors (i), and its class lies in HH.

Let MM be the constant of Scaled Cutoffs and the Second-Moment Test Functions: Uniform Derivative Bounds and Agreement on a Ball (ii) for the chosen χ\chi. For n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N} and x∈Rdx\in\mathbb{R}^{d} put fn(x)=∥∇ψn(x)−x∥2f_{n}(x)=\lVert\nabla\psi_{n}(x)-x\rVert^{2}. Since ∇ψn\nabla\psi_{n} and id\mathrm{id} are square-integrable random vectors on (Rd,B(Rd),μ)(\mathbb{R}^{d},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d}),\mu), so is their pointwise difference ∇ψn−id\nabla\psi_{n}-\mathrm{id} (The Space of Square-Integrable Random Vectors (i)), which is therefore Borel, and fn=∥∇ψn−id∥2f_{n}=\lVert\nabla\psi_{n}-\mathrm{id}\rVert^{2} is the random variable of Random Vectors: Coordinates, Functions, Pairs and Almost-Sure Equality (ii), hence Borel; also 0≤fn(x)0\le f_{n}(x) for every xx by claim 1 of Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square and claim 2 of Nonnegativity of Squares in an Ordered Field, so ∣fn(x)∣=fn(x)|f_{n}(x)|=f_{n}(x). For every i∈[d]i\in[d], ∣∂iψn(x)−xi∣≤∣∂iψn(x)∣+∣xi∣≤M∥x∥+∥x∥|\partial_{i}\psi_{n}(x)-x_{i}|\le|\partial_{i}\psi_{n}(x)|+|x_{i}|\le M\lVert x\rVert+\lVert x\rVert by claim 5 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, Scaled Cutoffs and the Second-Moment Test Functions: Uniform Derivative Bounds and Agreement on a Ball (ii) and claim 4 of Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square, so by claim 1 of Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square, claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field and claim 1 of Comparison and Absolute Value Bounds for Finite Sums of Real Numbers,

fn(x)=∑i=1d(∂iψn(x)−xi)2≤∑i=1d(M+1)2∥x∥2=d (M+1)2∥x∥2=:g(x),f_{n}(x)=\sum_{i=1}^{d}\bigl(\partial_{i}\psi_{n}(x)-x_{i}\bigr)^{2}\le\sum_{i=1}^{d}(M+1)^{2}\lVert x\rVert^{2}=d\,(M+1)^{2}\lVert x\rVert^{2}=:g(x),

the last equality by claim 3 of Properties of Finite Sums and The Canonical Map from the Natural Numbers to a Field; gg is integrable, being a scalar multiple of the integrable function ∥x∥2\lVert x\rVert^{2} (claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion). Fix xx. By claim 1 of The Archimedean Property of the Real Numbers there is n0∈Nn_{0}\in\mathbb{N} with ∥x∥<n0\lVert x\rVert<n_{0}, and for n≥n0n\ge n_{0} we have n0≤nn_{0}\le n as real numbers, so ∥x∥<n\lVert x\rVert<n (claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field) and, by Scaled Cutoffs and the Second-Moment Test Functions: Uniform Derivative Bounds and Agreement on a Ball (iii), ∂iψn(x)=xi\partial_{i}\psi_{n}(x)=x_{i} for every ii, whence fn(x)=0f_{n}(x)=0. Thus fn(x)→0f_{n}(x)\to0 for every xx, and claim 3 of Dominated Convergence Theorem gives ∫Rdfn dμ→∫Rd0 dμ=0\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}f_{n}\,d\mu\to\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}0\,d\mu=0 (the integral of the zero function vanishing by claim 6(a) of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space), that is, ∥∇ψn−id∥μ2→0\lVert\nabla\psi_{n}-\mathrm{id}\rVert_{\mu}^{2}\to0, the integral of the nonnegative function fnf_{n} in the sense of Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation (iii) agreeing with its integral as an integrable function by claim 6(c) of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space. Given ε>0\varepsilon>0, eventually ∥∇ψn−id∥μ2<ε2\lVert\nabla\psi_{n}-\mathrm{id}\rVert_{\mu}^{2}<\varepsilon^{2}, hence ∥∇ψn−id∥μ<ε\lVert\nabla\psi_{n}-\mathrm{id}\rVert_{\mu}<\varepsilon by claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field; so ∥∇ψn−id∥μ→0\lVert\nabla\psi_{n}-\mathrm{id}\rVert_{\mu}\to0, which says that ∇ψn→id\nabla\psi_{n}\to\mathrm{id} in (H,dμ)(H,d_{\mu}). Since each ∇ψn∈Gμ\nabla\psi_{n}\in G_{\mu}, Sequential Characterization of the Closure in a Metric Space gives id∈Gμ‾=Tμ\mathrm{id}\in\overline{G_{\mu}}=T_{\mu}.

Step 3: claim 3. By Scaled Cutoffs and the Second-Moment Test Functions: Uniform Derivative Bounds and Agreement on a Ball (ii), ∣Δψn(x)∣≤dM|\Delta\psi_{n}(x)|\le dM for all nn and xx, and the constant dMdM is integrable with respect to μ\mu with ∫dM dμ=dM μ(Rd)=dM\int dM\,d\mu=dM\,\mu(\mathbb{R}^{d})=dM by claim 6(a) of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space and μ(Rd)=1\mu(\mathbb{R}^{d})=1 (Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation (iii)); each Δψn\Delta\psi_{n} is Borel by The Gradient of a Test Function is Bounded and Square-Integrable, and Its Laplacian Bounded and Integrable, Against Every Probability Measure (ii). For fixed xx and n≥n0n\ge n_{0} as in Step 2, Δψn(x)=d\Delta\psi_{n}(x)=d by Scaled Cutoffs and the Second-Moment Test Functions: Uniform Derivative Bounds and Agreement on a Ball (iii), so Δψn(x)→d\Delta\psi_{n}(x)\to d. By claim 3 of Dominated Convergence Theorem, ∫Δψn dμ→∫d dμ=d μ(Rd)=d\int\Delta\psi_{n}\,d\mu\to\int d\,d\mu=d\,\mu(\mathbb{R}^{d})=d, the constant integral again by claim 6(a) of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space.

Step 4: claim 4. (a) The functional on GμG_{\mu}. For g∈Gμg\in G_{\mu} choose ψ∈Cc∞(Rd)\psi\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) with g=∇ψg=\nabla\psi and put ℓ~(g)=ℓ(ψ)\tilde\ell(g)=\ell(\psi). This does not depend on the choice: if also g=∇ϕg=\nabla\phi, then ∇(ψ−ϕ)=∇ψ−∇ϕ\nabla(\psi-\phi)=\nabla\psi-\nabla\phi (The Gradient of a Test Function is Bounded and Square-Integrable, and Its Laplacian Bounded and Integrable, Against Every Probability Measure (iii)) is the zero vector of HH, whose norm is 00 by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space (ii), so ∣ℓ(ψ)−ℓ(ϕ)∣=∣ℓ(ψ−ϕ)∣≤C∥∇(ψ−ϕ)∥μ=0|\ell(\psi)-\ell(\phi)|=|\ell(\psi-\phi)|\le C\lVert\nabla(\psi-\phi)\rVert_{\mu}=0 and ℓ(ψ)=ℓ(ϕ)\ell(\psi)=\ell(\phi) by claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field. For g=∇ψg=\nabla\psi, h=∇ϕh=\nabla\phi in GμG_{\mu} and a,b∈Ra,b\in\mathbb{R}, ag+bh=∇(aψ+bϕ)ag+bh=\nabla(a\psi+b\phi) gives ℓ~(ag+bh)=aℓ~(g)+bℓ~(h)\tilde\ell(ag+bh)=a\tilde\ell(g)+b\tilde\ell(h), and ∣ℓ~(g)∣≤C∥g∥μ|\tilde\ell(g)|\le C\lVert g\rVert_{\mu}. Consequently ∣ℓ~(g)−ℓ~(h)∣=∣ℓ~(g−h)∣≤C dμ(g,h)|\tilde\ell(g)-\tilde\ell(h)|=|\tilde\ell(g-h)|\le C\,d_{\mu}(g,h), so ℓ~\tilde\ell is Lipschitz with constant CC from (Gμ,dμ)(G_{\mu},d_{\mu}) to (R,dR)(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}), hence uniformly continuous on GμG_{\mu} by A Lipschitz Map is Uniformly Continuous and Continuous.

(b) Extension to TμT_{\mu}. By Step 1, GμG_{\mu} is nonempty and dense in the metric space (Tμ,dμ)(T_{\mu},d_{\mu}), so Extension of a Uniformly Continuous Real Function from a Dense Subset (i) yields L:Tμ→RL:T_{\mu}\to\mathbb{R}, continuous on TμT_{\mu}, with L(g)=ℓ~(g)L(g)=\tilde\ell(g) for g∈Gμg\in G_{\mu}. Continuity on (Tμ,dμ)(T_{\mu},d_{\mu}) is sequential continuity by Continuity Between Metric Spaces is Equivalent to Sequential Continuity (iii). Let ξ,η∈Tμ\xi,\eta\in T_{\mu}, a,b∈Ra,b\in\mathbb{R}, and choose sequences (gm)(g_{m}), (hm)(h_{m}) in GμG_{\mu} with gm→ξg_{m}\to\xi, hm→ηh_{m}\to\eta in HH, hence in (Tμ,dμ)(T_{\mu},d_{\mu}). Then agm+bhm→aξ+bηag_{m}+bh_{m}\to a\xi+b\eta (The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity (iv)), so L(aξ+bη)=lim⁡mL(agm+bhm)=lim⁡m(aL(gm)+bL(hm))=aL(ξ)+bL(η)L(a\xi+b\eta)=\lim_{m}L(ag_{m}+bh_{m})=\lim_{m}\bigl(aL(g_{m})+bL(h_{m})\bigr)=aL(\xi)+bL(\eta) by claims 3 and 1 of Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences; and ∣L(ξ)∣=lim⁡m∣L(gm)∣≤lim⁡mC∥gm∥μ=C∥ξ∥μ|L(\xi)|=\lim_{m}|L(g_{m})|\le\lim_{m}C\lVert g_{m}\rVert_{\mu}=C\lVert\xi\rVert_{\mu}, using claim 4 of Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences for ∣L(gm)∣→∣L(ξ)∣|L(g_{m})|\to|L(\xi)|, The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity (v) for ∥gm∥μ→∥ξ∥μ\lVert g_{m}\rVert_{\mu}\to\lVert\xi\rVert_{\mu}, claim 3 of Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences for C∥gm∥μ→C∥ξ∥μC\lVert g_{m}\rVert_{\mu}\to C\lVert\xi\rVert_{\mu}, and claim 1 of Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences.

(c) Riesz representation. Let P=PTμP=P_{T_{\mu}} be the orthogonal projection onto the closed linear subspace TμT_{\mu} (Square-Integrable Vector Fields Against a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space, and Test Functions: Standing Notation (ii)), which satisfies Pζ∈TμP\zeta\in T_{\mu} for every ζ∈H\zeta\in H (Nearest-Point Projection onto a Nonempty Closed Convex Subset of a Real Hilbert Space (i)), is linear with Pζ=ζP\zeta=\zeta for ζ∈Tμ\zeta\in T_{\mu} (Orthogonal Projection onto a Closed Linear Subspace of a Real Hilbert Space (ii)), and satisfies ∥Pζ∥μ≤∥ζ∥μ\lVert P\zeta\rVert_{\mu}\le\lVert\zeta\rVert_{\mu} (Orthogonal Projection onto a Closed Linear Subspace of a Real Hilbert Space (iii)). Define ℓ^:H→R\hat\ell:H\to\mathbb{R} by ℓ^(ζ)=L(Pζ)\hat\ell(\zeta)=L(P\zeta). It is linear, as a composition of linear maps, and ∣ℓ^(ζ)∣≤C∥Pζ∥μ≤C∥ζ∥μ|\hat\ell(\zeta)|\le C\lVert P\zeta\rVert_{\mu}\le C\lVert\zeta\rVert_{\mu}, so ℓ^\hat\ell is a bounded linear functional on HH. By The Riesz Representation Theorem for a Real Hilbert Space (i) there is ξ∈H\xi\in H with ℓ^(ζ)=⟨ζ,ξ⟩μ\hat\ell(\zeta)=\langle\zeta,\xi\rangle_{\mu} for every ζ∈H\zeta\in H. If ζ∈Tμ⊥\zeta\in T_{\mu}^{\perp} (Orthogonality, Orthogonal Complement and Orthonormal Families in a Real Inner Product Space (ii)), then PζP\zeta is the zero vector by Orthogonal Projection onto a Closed Linear Subspace of a Real Hilbert Space (i) (the zero vector lies in TμT_{\mu} and ζ−0∈Tμ⊥\zeta-0\in T_{\mu}^{\perp}), so ⟨ζ,ξ⟩μ=L(0)=0\langle\zeta,\xi\rangle_{\mu}=L(0)=0 (LL is linear), hence ⟨ξ,ζ⟩μ=0\langle\xi,\zeta\rangle_{\mu}=0 by the symmetry of the inner product (Real Inner Product Spaces (i)); as ζ∈Tμ⊥\zeta\in T_{\mu}^{\perp} was arbitrary, ξ∈(Tμ⊥)⊥=Tμ\xi\in(T_{\mu}^{\perp})^{\perp}=T_{\mu} by Orthogonal Projection onto a Closed Linear Subspace of a Real Hilbert Space (iv). For ψ∈Cc∞(Rd)\psi\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}^{d}), since ∇ψ∈Tμ\nabla\psi\in T_{\mu}, ⟨ξ,∇ψ⟩μ=⟨∇ψ,ξ⟩μ=ℓ^(∇ψ)=L(∇ψ)=ℓ~(∇ψ)=ℓ(ψ)\langle\xi,\nabla\psi\rangle_{\mu}=\langle\nabla\psi,\xi\rangle_{\mu}=\hat\ell(\nabla\psi)=L(\nabla\psi)=\tilde\ell(\nabla\psi)=\ell(\psi), the symmetry of the inner product being part of Real Inner Product Spaces (i). Moreover ∥ξ∥μ2=⟨ξ,ξ⟩μ=ℓ^(ξ)≤C∥ξ∥μ\lVert\xi\rVert_{\mu}^{2}=\langle\xi,\xi\rangle_{\mu}=\hat\ell(\xi)\le C\lVert\xi\rVert_{\mu} (Real Inner Product Spaces (ii)); if ∥ξ∥μ>0\lVert\xi\rVert_{\mu}>0, multiplying by its inverse (positive by claim 7 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field; claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field) gives ∥ξ∥μ≤C\lVert\xi\rVert_{\mu}\le C, and otherwise ∥ξ∥μ=0≤C\lVert\xi\rVert_{\mu}=0\le C.

(d) Uniqueness. Let ξ′∈Tμ\xi'\in T_{\mu} also satisfy ⟨ξ′,∇ψ⟩μ=ℓ(ψ)\langle\xi',\nabla\psi\rangle_{\mu}=\ell(\psi) for every ψ\psi, and put ζ=ξ−ξ′∈Tμ\zeta=\xi-\xi'\in T_{\mu} (Step 1). Then ⟨ζ,g⟩μ=0\langle\zeta,g\rangle_{\mu}=0 for every g∈Gμg\in G_{\mu} by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space (i). Choose a sequence (gm)(g_{m}) in GμG_{\mu} with gm→ζg_{m}\to\zeta; then ∥ζ∥μ2=⟨ζ,ζ⟩μ=lim⁡m⟨ζ,gm⟩μ=0\lVert\zeta\rVert_{\mu}^{2}=\langle\zeta,\zeta\rangle_{\mu}=\lim_{m}\langle\zeta,g_{m}\rangle_{\mu}=0 by Real Inner Product Spaces (ii) and The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity (v), so ∥ζ∥μ=0\lVert\zeta\rVert_{\mu}=0 and ζ\zeta is the zero vector by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space (iii), that is, ξ′=ξ\xi'=\xi.

Step 5: claim 5. By Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space (i), ⟨η−ξ,∇ψ⟩μ=ℓ(ψ)−ℓ(ψ)=0\langle\eta-\xi,\nabla\psi\rangle_{\mu}=\ell(\psi)-\ell(\psi)=0 for every ψ\psi, so η−ξ\eta-\xi is orthogonal to every element of GμG_{\mu}, and, by the limit argument of Step 4(d), to every element of TμT_{\mu}: η−ξ∈Tμ⊥\eta-\xi\in T_{\mu}^{\perp}. Since ξ∈Tμ\xi\in T_{\mu}, Orthogonal Projection onto a Closed Linear Subspace of a Real Hilbert Space (i) gives ξ=PTμη\xi=P_{T_{\mu}}\eta, and Orthogonal Projection onto a Closed Linear Subspace of a Real Hilbert Space (iii) gives ∥ξ∥μ≤∥η∥μ\lVert\xi\rVert_{\mu}\le\lVert\eta\rVert_{\mu}. If η∈Tμ\eta\in T_{\mu}, then PTμη=ηP_{T_{\mu}}\eta=\eta by Orthogonal Projection onto a Closed Linear Subspace of a Real Hilbert Space (ii), so ξ=η\xi=\eta.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…