TheoremBase

Tests the relative-score identity against the cylindrical functions gm(xk)g_m(x_k), where gmg_m is the derivative of the scaled second-moment cutoff on the line, and passes to the limit by dominated convergence and Cauchy-Schwarz to get the coordinate identity; the pairing then follows by expanding the L2(nuL^2(nu;Xa)X^a) inner product as the series of coordinate inner products.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.

Throughout, xk=⟨x,ek⟩x_{k}=\langle x,e_{k}\rangle is the kk-th coordinate of x∈Xx\in X (Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §coordinates), integrals are taken on the measure space (X,B(X),ν)(X,\mathcal{B}(X),\nu), and L2(ν)L^{2}(\nu), with inner product ⟨⋅,⋅⟩L2(ν)\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle_{L^{2}(\nu)} and norm ∥⋅∥L2(ν)\lVert\cdot\rVert_{L^{2}(\nu)}, is as in the statement. Since ν∈Pρa\nu\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho}, we have ν∈P2(X)\nu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X) by The Noise Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure: Existence of Noise-Optimal Couplings, Comparison with the Quadratic Wasserstein Distance and Lower Semicontinuity §moments, that is, ∫X∣x∣2 ν(dx)<∞\int_{X}|x|^{2}\,\nu(dx)<\infty by The Second Moment of a Borel Probability Measure on a Hilbert Space and the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment §space. The variances ckc_{k} are positive by Variance Sequences and Their Truncations §variances, cc being a variance sequence by A Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure on the Noise Wasserstein Space, Rescaled Heads and Gaussian Tails: Standing Notation §gaussian.

Step 1 (the coordinates are square-integrable). Fix k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}. The function x↦xkx\mapsto x_{k} is Borel by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity, so x↦xk2x\mapsto x_{k}^{2} is Borel by claim 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions. For x∈Xx\in X, since eke_{k} is a unit vector of the orthonormal basis, The Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality in a Real Inner Product Space gives ∣xk∣=∣⟨x,ek⟩∣≤∣x∣ ∣ek∣=∣x∣|x_{k}|=|\langle x,e_{k}\rangle|\le|x|\,|e_{k}|=|x|, hence xk2≤∣x∣2x_{k}^{2}\le|x|^{2}. By monotonicity of the integral of nonnegative measurable functions (Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative),

∫Xxk2 ν(dx)≤∫X∣x∣2 ν(dx)<∞.\int_{X}x_{k}^{2}\,\nu(dx)\le\int_{X}|x|^{2}\,\nu(dx)<\infty .

The power ∣xk∣2|x_{k}|^{2} with the real exponent 22 used in Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm §space is the natural power ∣xk∣ ∣xk∣=xk2|x_{k}|\,|x_{k}|=x_{k}^{2} by Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §agreement. Hence x↦xkx\mapsto x_{k} is 22-integrable with respect to ν\nu in the sense of Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm §space, so its class lies in L2(ν)L^{2}(\nu), and x↦xk2x\mapsto x_{k}^{2} is integrable by the criterion of Measure Spaces and the Lebesgue Integral: Standing Notation §integral; we write mk=∫Xxk2 ν(dx)m_{k}=\int_{X}x_{k}^{2}\,\nu(dx), a real number. This is the first assertion of claim 1.

Step 2 (a cut-off of the identity map of R\mathbb{R}). Apply Scaled Cutoffs and the Second-Moment Test Functions: Uniform Derivative Bounds and Agreement on a Ball with q=1q=1, identifying R1\mathbb{R}^{1} with R\mathbb{R}, so that the Euclidean norm of tt is ∣t∣|t|. Let χ\chi, χR\chi_{R} and ψR\psi_{R} be the functions of that lemma, and let M≥0M\ge0 be the constant of its clause 2, which does not depend on RR. For m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N}, which is positive, put gm=∂1ψm:R→Rg_{m}=\partial_{1}\psi_{m}:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}. The following hold for every m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N}.

(a) By clause 2 of that lemma ψm\psi_{m} is smooth, hence of class C2C^{2} on R1\mathbb{R}^{1} by Smooth Map on a Euclidean Open Set, so by clause 2 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set (with k=1k=1 there) gmg_{m} is of class C1C^{1} on R1\mathbb{R}^{1}, and its partial derivative, written gm′=∂1gmg_{m}'=\partial_{1}g_{m}, is the iterated partial derivative ∂1∂1ψm\partial_{1}\partial_{1}\psi_{m} of clause 4 there. By clause 1 there, gmg_{m} and gm′g_{m}' are continuous at every point of R\mathbb{R}.

(b) By clause 2 of that lemma, ∣gm(t)∣≤M∣t∣|g_{m}(t)|\le M|t| and ∣gm′(t)∣≤M|g_{m}'(t)|\le M for every t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R}.

(c) By clause 3 of that lemma, gm(t)=tg_{m}(t)=t and gm′(t)=δ11=1g_{m}'(t)=\delta_{11}=1 for every t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R} with ∣t∣<m|t|<m.

(d) gmg_{m} is bounded. If ∣t∣≤2m|t|\le2m then ∣gm(t)∣≤2mM|g_{m}(t)|\le2mM by (b). If ∣t∣>2m|t|>2m, put η=∣t∣−2m>0\eta=|t|-2m>0; by clause 1 of that lemma, χm(u)=0\chi_{m}(u)=0 and hence ψm(u)=12χm(u)u2=0\psi_{m}(u)=\tfrac12\chi_{m}(u)u^{2}=0 for every u∈Ru\in\mathbb{R} with ∣u∣≥2m|u|\ge2m, and for 0<∣s∣<η0<|s|<\eta we have ∣t+s∣≥∣t∣−∣s∣>2m|t+s|\ge|t|-|s|>2m, so the difference quotient (ψm(t+s)−ψm(t))/s(\psi_{m}(t+s)-\psi_{m}(t))/s is 00. By Partial Derivative on a Euclidean Open Set the value gm(t)=∂1ψm(t)g_{m}(t)=\partial_{1}\psi_{m}(t) therefore satisfies ∣gm(t)∣<ε|g_{m}(t)|<\varepsilon for every ε>0\varepsilon>0, so gm(t)=0g_{m}(t)=0. Thus ∣gm(t)∣≤2mM|g_{m}(t)|\le2mM for every t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R}.

Step 3 (cylindrical approximants of the coordinate). Fix k,m∈Nk,m\in\mathbb{N} and define hm:Rk→Rh_{m}:\mathbb{R}^{k}\to\mathbb{R} by hm(y)=gm(yk)h_{m}(y)=g_{m}(y_{k}). For i∈[k]i\in[k] with i≠ki\ne k, varying the ii-th variable of yy does not change yky_{k}, so every difference quotient of hmh_{m} at yy in the ii-th variable is 00 and, by Partial Derivative on a Euclidean Open Set, ∂ihm(y)\partial_{i}h_{m}(y) exists and equals 00. In the kk-th variable the difference quotient of hmh_{m} at yy with increment ss is (gm(yk+s)−gm(yk))/s(g_{m}(y_{k}+s)-g_{m}(y_{k}))/s, the difference quotient of gmg_{m} at yky_{k}, so by the same definition ∂khm(y)\partial_{k}h_{m}(y) exists and equals gm′(yk)g_{m}'(y_{k}). Since ∣yk−zk∣≤∥y−z∥|y_{k}-z_{k}|\le\lVert y-z\rVert for y,z∈Rky,z\in\mathbb{R}^{k}, the continuity of gmg_{m} and gm′g_{m}' at yky_{k} (Step 2(a)) gives the continuity of hmh_{m} and of y↦gm′(yk)y\mapsto g_{m}'(y_{k}) at yy; constant functions are continuous. Hence hmh_{m} is of class C1C^{1} on Rk\mathbb{R}^{k} by clauses 1 and 3 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set, and hmh_{m} and all its partial derivatives are bounded by Step 2(b) and (d). Thus hm∈Cb1(Rk)h_{m}\in C^{1}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{k}) by Bounded Continuously Differentiable Functions with Bounded Partial Derivatives on Euclidean Space §bounded. Consequently the function

φm=hm∘pk,φm(x)=gm(xk),\varphi_{m}=h_{m}\circ p_{k},\qquad\varphi_{m}(x)=g_{m}(x_{k}),

is a bounded C1C^{1} cylindrical function by Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions on a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis §cylindrical, with representation (k,hm)(k,h_{m}), and by Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §partial its kk-th partial derivative is ∂kφm=(∂khm)∘pk\partial_{k}\varphi_{m}=(\partial_{k}h_{m})\circ p_{k}, that is, ∂kφm(x)=gm′(xk)\partial_{k}\varphi_{m}(x)=g_{m}'(x_{k}) for x∈Xx\in X.

Step 4 (the score identity along the approximants). By The Relative Score with Respect to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on a Hilbert Space §score applied to φm\varphi_{m}, together with the integrability of x↦xkφm(x)x\mapsto x_{k}\varphi_{m}(x) (Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §coordinate-integrable) and of ∂kφm\partial_{k}\varphi_{m} (Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §square-integrable) and linearity of the integral (Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable),

⟨ζk,φm⟩L2(ν)=1ck∫Xxk gm(xk) ν(dx)−∫Xgm′(xk) ν(dx)(m∈N).(1)\langle\zeta_{k},\varphi_{m}\rangle_{L^{2}(\nu)}=\frac{1}{c_{k}}\int_{X}x_{k}\,g_{m}(x_{k})\,\nu(dx)-\int_{X}g_{m}'(x_{k})\,\nu(dx)\qquad(m\in\mathbb{N}).\tag{1}

Step 5 (dominated convergence). Fix x∈Xx\in X. By The Archimedean Property of the Real Numbers there is m0∈Nm_{0}\in\mathbb{N} with ∣xk∣<m0|x_{k}|<m_{0}, so ∣xk∣<m|x_{k}|<m for every m≥m0m\ge m_{0}, and Step 2(c) gives, for such mm,

xk gm(xk)=xk2,gm′(xk)=1,(gm(xk)−xk)2=0.x_{k}\,g_{m}(x_{k})=x_{k}^{2},\qquad g_{m}'(x_{k})=1,\qquad\bigl(g_{m}(x_{k})-x_{k}\bigr)^{2}=0 .

Hence, pointwise on XX, the three sequences converge to xk2x_{k}^{2}, 11 and 00. The functions x↦xkgm(xk)=xkφm(x)x\mapsto x_{k}g_{m}(x_{k})=x_{k}\varphi_{m}(x), x↦gm′(xk)=∂kφm(x)x\mapsto g_{m}'(x_{k})=\partial_{k}\varphi_{m}(x) and x↦(φm(x)−xk)2x\mapsto(\varphi_{m}(x)-x_{k})^{2} are Borel, by Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §bounded-borel, Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity and claims 2 and 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions. By Step 2(b), ∣gm(t)−t∣≤∣gm(t)∣+∣t∣≤(M+1)∣t∣|g_{m}(t)-t|\le|g_{m}(t)|+|t|\le(M+1)|t| for t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R}, so for all xx and mm

∣xk gm(xk)∣≤M xk2,∣gm′(xk)∣≤M,(gm(xk)−xk)2≤(M+1)2xk2.|x_{k}\,g_{m}(x_{k})|\le M\,x_{k}^{2},\qquad|g_{m}'(x_{k})|\le M,\qquad\bigl(g_{m}(x_{k})-x_{k}\bigr)^{2}\le(M+1)^{2}x_{k}^{2}.

The dominating functions are integrable: x↦xk2x\mapsto x_{k}^{2} by Step 1 and its multiples by Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable; the constant function MM belongs to FCb1(X)\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X) by Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §linear and so is integrable by Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §square-integrable. Claim 3 of Dominated Convergence Theorem therefore yields, as m→∞m\to\infty,

∫Xxk gm(xk) ν(dx)→mk,∫Xgm′(xk) ν(dx)→∫X1 ν(dx)=ν(X)=1,∫X(φm(x)−xk)2 ν(dx)→0,(2)\int_{X}x_{k}\,g_{m}(x_{k})\,\nu(dx)\to m_{k},\qquad\int_{X}g_{m}'(x_{k})\,\nu(dx)\to\int_{X}1\,\nu(dx)=\nu(X)=1,\qquad\int_{X}\bigl(\varphi_{m}(x)-x_{k}\bigr)^{2}\,\nu(dx)\to0,\tag{2}

where ∫X1 ν(dx)=ν(X)\int_{X}1\,\nu(dx)=\nu(X) by The Integral of an Indicator Function is the Measure of the Set with A=XA=X, and ν(X)=1\nu(X)=1 as ν∈P(X)\nu\in\mathcal{P}(X) (Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §measures); the third limit is the integral of the zero function, which is 00 by The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §null-integral with the null set N=∅N=\emptyset.

Step 6 (convergence of the left-hand side of (1)). In L2(ν)L^{2}(\nu) the difference of the classes of φm\varphi_{m} and xkx_{k} is the class of φm−xk\varphi_{m}-x_{k} by The Lebesgue Space of Power-Integrable Functions §space, and by The Lebesgue Space of Square-Integrable Functions is a Real Hilbert Space §inner-product and Real Inner Product Space §norm its squared norm is ∫X(φm(x)−xk)2 ν(dx)\int_{X}(\varphi_{m}(x)-x_{k})^{2}\,\nu(dx). Using the bilinearity and symmetry of the inner product (Real Inner Product Space §inner-product) and The Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality in a Real Inner Product Space in the real inner product space L2(ν)L^{2}(\nu),

Dm2≤∥ζk∥L2(ν)2∫X(φm(x)−xk)2 ν(dx),Dm=⟨ζk,φm⟩L2(ν)−⟨ζk,xk⟩L2(ν)=⟨ζk,φm−xk⟩L2(ν).D_{m}^{2}\le\lVert\zeta_{k}\rVert_{L^{2}(\nu)}^{2}\int_{X}\bigl(\varphi_{m}(x)-x_{k}\bigr)^{2}\,\nu(dx),\qquad D_{m}=\langle\zeta_{k},\varphi_{m}\rangle_{L^{2}(\nu)}-\langle\zeta_{k},x_{k}\rangle_{L^{2}(\nu)}=\langle\zeta_{k},\varphi_{m}-x_{k}\rangle_{L^{2}(\nu)} .

By (2) and the limit law for scalar multiples, the right-hand side tends to 00. Given ε>0\varepsilon>0 it is therefore eventually less than ε2\varepsilon^{2}, so Dm2<ε2D_{m}^{2}<\varepsilon^{2} and hence ∣Dm∣<ε|D_{m}|<\varepsilon eventually. Thus ⟨ζk,φm⟩L2(ν)→⟨ζk,xk⟩L2(ν)\langle\zeta_{k},\varphi_{m}\rangle_{L^{2}(\nu)}\to\langle\zeta_{k},x_{k}\rangle_{L^{2}(\nu)}.

Step 7 (claim 1). By (2) and the limit laws for scalar multiples and differences, the right-hand side of (1) tends to mk/ck−1m_{k}/c_{k}-1 as m→∞m\to\infty, while by Step 6 the left-hand side tends to ⟨ζk,xk⟩L2(ν)\langle\zeta_{k},x_{k}\rangle_{L^{2}(\nu)}. The two sides of (1) form the same sequence, so by uniqueness of limits (claim 1 of Uniqueness of Limits and Boundedness of Convergent Real Sequences)

⟨ζk,xk⟩L2(ν)=1ck∫Xxk2 ν(dx)−1.\langle\zeta_{k},x_{k}\rangle_{L^{2}(\nu)}=\frac{1}{c_{k}}\int_{X}x_{k}^{2}\,\nu(dx)-1 .

Step 8 (claim 2). Let bb be admissible. Since ν∈Pρa\nu\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho}, Diagonal Quadratic Profiles on the Noise Wasserstein Space: Moment Bounds, a Lipschitz Estimate, the Gradient Field, and Noise Intrinsic Test Functions §field provides Vb(ν)∈L2(ν;Xa)V_{b}(\nu)\in L^{2}(\nu;X^{a}) whose coordinate along fkf_{k} is the class of x↦ak1/2bkxkx\mapsto a_{k}^{1/2}b_{k}x_{k}, which is ak1/2bka_{k}^{1/2}b_{k} times the class xkx_{k} of Step 1 by The Lebesgue Space of Power-Integrable Functions §space; and by The Noise Score Field of a Measure of Finite Weighted Fisher Information: Existence, Norm, Pairing with Noise Gradients, Head Approximation and Tangency §field, applicable since ν∈P2(X)\nu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X) has a relative score and finite Fisher information relative to γc\gamma_{c} with weights aa, the coordinate of ZνaZ^{a}_{\nu} along fkf_{k} is ak1/2ζka_{k}^{1/2}\zeta_{k}. The space L2(ν;Xa)L^{2}(\nu;X^{a}) is that of The Space of Square-Integrable Hilbert-Valued Maps is a Real Hilbert Space: Coordinates and Synthesis on (X,B(X),ν)(X,\mathcal{B}(X),\nu) with E=XaE=X^{a} and the orthonormal basis (fk)k∈N(f_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}}, by Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space Transported in the Noise Norm: Standing Notation §fields; so by The Space of Square-Integrable Hilbert-Valued Maps is a Real Hilbert Space: Coordinates and Synthesis §coordinates the series

∑k=1∞⟨ak1/2ζk, ak1/2bkxk⟩L2(ν)\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\bigl\langle a_{k}^{1/2}\zeta_{k},\,a_{k}^{1/2}b_{k}x_{k}\bigr\rangle_{L^{2}(\nu)}

converges, with sum ⟨Zνa,Vb(ν)⟩ν\langle Z^{a}_{\nu},V_{b}(\nu)\rangle_{\nu}. By bilinearity of the inner product (Real Inner Product Space §inner-product), ak1/2ak1/2=aka_{k}^{1/2}a_{k}^{1/2}=a_{k} (ak1/2a_{k}^{1/2} being the nonnegative square root of aka_{k}, whose square is aka_{k} by Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root) and claim 1, its kk-th term equals

ak1/2ak1/2 bk ⟨ζk,xk⟩L2(ν)=ak bk(1ck∫Xxk2 ν(dx)−1).a_{k}^{1/2}a_{k}^{1/2}\,b_{k}\,\langle\zeta_{k},x_{k}\rangle_{L^{2}(\nu)}=a_{k}\,b_{k}\Bigl(\frac{1}{c_{k}}\int_{X}x_{k}^{2}\,\nu(dx)-1\Bigr).

Hence the series of claim 2 is this series term by term; it converges, and its sum is ⟨Zνa,Vb(ν)⟩ν\langle Z^{a}_{\nu},V_{b}(\nu)\rangle_{\nu}.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…