TheoremBase

Proof

Throughout, sums, differences, products and scalar multiples of measurable real-valued maps are measurable by claim 2 and claim 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions, indicators of measurable sets are measurable by its claim 1, and integrals of finite sums of nonnegative measurable maps are the sums of the integrals, and the integral is monotone, by Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral. We write Nw(a,b)=∑q=1nwq(a−bq)\mathsf{N}_w(a,b)=\sum_{q=1}^{n}w_q(a-b_q) as in Weighted Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality on a Measure Space and the Symmetrised Score Functional: Bounds and Averaging, and Uq={z:rqLq(z)<1−δ}\mathsf{U}_q=\{z:\mathsf{r}_qL_q(z)<1-\delta\}, so that U=⋃q=1nUq\mathsf{U}=\bigcup_{q=1}^{n}\mathsf{U}_q and πq=∫Uqℓ dν\pi_q=\int_{\mathsf{U}_q}\ell\,d\nu.

Step 1 (claim 1). Measurability. The map t↦1/tt\mapsto1/t is sequentially continuous on (0,∞)(0,\infty) (by Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences), and ℓ\ell takes values in (0,∞)(0,\infty), so 1/ℓ1/\ell is measurable by Sequentially Continuous Functions of Measurable Euclidean Maps are Measurable (with E=(0,∞)E=(0,\infty)), and Lq=ℓq⋅(1/ℓ)L_q=\ell_q\cdot(1/\ell) is measurable as a product. Hence each Uq={rqLq−(1−δ)<0}\mathsf{U}_q=\{\mathsf{r}_qL_q-(1-\delta)<0\} is measurable and so is the finite union U\mathsf{U}. Integrals. ℓLq=ℓq\ell L_q=\ell_q pointwise, so ∫ℓLq dν=1\int\ell L_q\,d\nu=1. Pointwise, ℓ(Lq−1)2+2ℓLq=ℓLq2+ℓ\ell(L_q-1)^{2}+2\ell L_q=\ell L_q^{2}+\ell (all terms nonnegative), so by additivity Vq+2=∫ℓLq2 dν+1V_q+2=\int\ell L_q^{2}\,d\nu+1 in [0,∞][0,\infty], i.e. ∫ℓLq2 dν=1+Vq\int\ell L_q^{2}\,d\nu=1+V_q. Thus Vq<∞V_q<\infty if and only if ∫ℓLq2 dν<∞\int\ell L_q^{2}\,d\nu<\infty, and then Vq=∫ℓLq2 dν−1V_q=\int\ell L_q^{2}\,d\nu-1.

Step 2 (claim 2). On Uq\mathsf{U}_q one has 1−rqLq>δ>01-\mathsf{r}_qL_q>\delta>0, hence (1−rqLq)2>δ2(1-\mathsf{r}_qL_q)^{2}>\delta^{2}, and therefore 1Uq≤δ−2(1−rqLq)2\mathbf{1}_{\mathsf{U}_q}\le\delta^{-2}(1-\mathsf{r}_qL_q)^{2} pointwise on Z\mathsf{Z} (the right side being nonnegative off Uq\mathsf{U}_q). Multiplying by ℓ\ell and integrating, πq≤δ−2∫ℓ(1−rqLq)2 dν\pi_q\le\delta^{-2}\int\ell(1-\mathsf{r}_qL_q)^{2}\,d\nu. If rq=0\mathsf{r}_q=0, the integral is ∫ℓ dν=1=(1−rq)2+rq2Vq\int\ell\,d\nu=1=(1-\mathsf{r}_q)^{2}+\mathsf{r}_q^{2}V_q (with 0⋅∞=00\cdot\infty=0), and the claim follows. If rq>0\mathsf{r}_q>0 and Vq=∞V_q=\infty, the right side of the claim is ∞\infty and there is nothing to prove. If rq>0\mathsf{r}_q>0 and Vq<∞V_q<\infty, then ∫ℓLq2 dν<∞\int\ell L_q^{2}\,d\nu<\infty by Step 1; the pointwise identity ℓ(1−rqLq)2+2rqℓLq=ℓ+rq2ℓLq2\ell(1-\mathsf{r}_qL_q)^{2}+2\mathsf{r}_q\ell L_q=\ell+\mathsf{r}_q^{2}\ell L_q^{2} between nonnegative measurable maps, integrated by additivity, shows that both sides have the finite total 1+rq2(1+Vq)1+\mathsf{r}_q^{2}(1+V_q), and hence ∫ℓ(1−rqLq)2 dν=1+rq2(1+Vq)−2rq=(1−rq)2+rq2Vq\int\ell(1-\mathsf{r}_qL_q)^{2}\,d\nu=1+\mathsf{r}_q^{2}(1+V_q)-2\mathsf{r}_q=(1-\mathsf{r}_q)^{2}+\mathsf{r}_q^{2}V_q.

Step 3 (claim 3). Fix A∈ZA\in\mathcal{Z} and qq, and put IA=∫Aℓ dν∈[0,1]I_A=\int_A\ell\,d\nu\in[0,1].

Case Vq<∞V_q<\infty. Apply claim 1 of Weighted Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality on a Measure Space and the Symmetrised Score Functional: Bounds and Averaging on (Z,Z,ν)(\mathsf{Z},\mathcal{Z},\nu) with β=ℓ1A\beta=\ell\mathbf{1}_A (measurable, ∫β dν=IA<∞\int\beta\,d\nu=I_A<\infty) and α=ℓ(Lq−1)1A\alpha=\ell(L_q-1)\mathbf{1}_A (measurable, vanishing where β=0\beta=0, i.e. off AA, since ℓ>0\ell>0). The associated map qαq_\alpha (the map called qq in that claim, renamed here since qq is an index), equal to α2/β\alpha^{2}/\beta on {β>0}=A\{\beta>0\}=A and to 00 off AA, equals ℓ(Lq−1)21A≤ℓ(Lq−1)2\ell(L_q-1)^{2}\mathbf{1}_A\le\ell(L_q-1)^{2}, so ∫qα dν≤Vq<∞\int q_\alpha\,d\nu\le V_q<\infty; the claim yields that α\alpha is integrable and (∫α dν)2≤IAVq(\int\alpha\,d\nu)^{2}\le I_AV_q, hence ∫α dν≤(IAVq)1/2=Vq1/2IA1/2\int\alpha\,d\nu\le(I_AV_q)^{1/2}=V_q^{1/2}I_A^{1/2} (a real number ss with s2≤cs^{2}\le c satisfies s≤c1/2s\le c^{1/2}, since s>c1/2≥0s>c^{1/2}\ge0 would give s2>cs^{2}>c; and (st)1/2=s1/2t1/2(st)^{1/2}=s^{1/2}t^{1/2} for s,t≥0s,t\ge0 by uniqueness of the nonnegative square root, Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root). Now ℓq1A=ℓ1A+α\ell_q\mathbf{1}_A=\ell\mathbf{1}_A+\alpha pointwise, where ℓq1A\ell_q\mathbf{1}_A and ℓ1A\ell\mathbf{1}_A are nonnegative with integrals at most 11, hence integrable; by the linearity of the integral for integrable maps (claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral), ∫Aℓq dν=IA+∫α dν≤IA+Vq1/2IA1/2\int_A\ell_q\,d\nu=I_A+\int\alpha\,d\nu\le I_A+V_q^{1/2}I_A^{1/2}.

Case Vq=∞V_q=\infty. If IA>0I_A>0 the right side is ∞\infty and there is nothing to prove. If IA=0I_A=0, then for every natural number kk, ν(A∩{ℓ>1/k})=∫1A∩{ℓ>1/k} dν≤k∫A∩{ℓ>1/k}ℓ dν≤kIA=0\nu(A\cap\{\ell>1/k\})=\int\mathbf{1}_{A\cap\{\ell>1/k\}}\,d\nu\le k\int_{A\cap\{\ell>1/k\}}\ell\,d\nu\le kI_A=0 by the integral of an indicator (Simple Function and Its Integral) and monotonicity (as 1A∩{ℓ>1/k}≤kℓ1A∩{ℓ>1/k}\mathbf{1}_{A\cap\{\ell>1/k\}}\le k\ell\mathbf{1}_{A\cap\{\ell>1/k\}}); since ℓ>0\ell>0, AA is the countable union of these sets, so ν(A)=0\nu(A)=0 by countable subadditivity (claim 4 of Basic Properties of a Measure). Then ∫min⁡(ℓq,k)1A dν≤kν(A)=0\int\min(\ell_q,k)\mathbf{1}_A\,d\nu\le k\nu(A)=0 for every kk (the map min⁡(ℓq,k)\min(\ell_q,k) being measurable by claim 4 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions), and min⁡(ℓq,k)1A\min(\ell_q,k)\mathbf{1}_A increases pointwise to ℓq1A\ell_q\mathbf{1}_A, so ∫Aℓq dν=0\int_A\ell_q\,d\nu=0 by Monotone Convergence Theorem, which is the claimed inequality with right side 0+∞⋅0=00+\infty\cdot0=0.

Step 4 (claim 4). Measurability. The maps ℓ\ell and rqℓq\mathsf{r}_q\ell_q are measurable, [0,∞)[0,\infty)-valued, with finite integrals 11 and rq\mathsf{r}_q; claim 3 of Weighted Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality on a Measure Space and the Symmetrised Score Functional: Bounds and Averaging (its measurability assertion) shows that z↦Φw(ℓ(z),r1ℓ1(z),…,rnℓn(z))z\mapsto\Phi_w(\ell(z),\mathsf{r}_1\ell_1(z),\dots,\mathsf{r}_n\ell_n(z)) is measurable. The map ℓ(∑qwq(1−rqLq))2\ell(\sum_qw_q(1-\mathsf{r}_qL_q))^{2} is measurable by the arithmetic rules.

Pointwise bound off U\mathsf{U}. Let z∉Uz\notin\mathsf{U}. Then rqℓq(z)≥(1−δ)ℓ(z)\mathsf{r}_q\ell_q(z)\ge(1-\delta)\ell(z) for every qq (as ℓ(z)>0\ell(z)>0 and rqLq(z)≥1−δ\mathsf{r}_qL_q(z)\ge1-\delta), and ℓ(z)>0\ell(z)>0, so claim 2(d) of Weighted Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality on a Measure Space and the Symmetrised Score Functional: Bounds and Averaging with a=ℓ(z)a=\ell(z) and bq=rqℓq(z)b_q=\mathsf{r}_q\ell_q(z) gives Φw(ℓ(z),(rqℓq(z))q)≤(1+δ)Nw(a,b)2/ℓ(z)\Phi_w(\ell(z),(\mathsf{r}_q\ell_q(z))_q)\le(1+\delta)\mathsf{N}_w(a,b)^{2}/\ell(z), where Nw(a,b)=∑qwq(ℓ(z)−rqℓq(z))=ℓ(z)∑qwq(1−rqLq(z))\mathsf{N}_w(a,b)=\sum_qw_q(\ell(z)-\mathsf{r}_q\ell_q(z))=\ell(z)\sum_qw_q(1-\mathsf{r}_qL_q(z)); hence Φw(… )≤(1+δ) ℓ(z)(∑qwq(1−rqLq(z)))2\Phi_w(\dots)\le(1+\delta)\,\ell(z)\bigl(\sum_qw_q(1-\mathsf{r}_qL_q(z))\bigr)^{2}.

Pointwise bound on U\mathsf{U}. For every zz, claim 2(b) of Weighted Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality on a Measure Space and the Symmetrised Score Functional: Bounds and Averaging gives Φw(ℓ(z),(rqℓq(z))q)≤2n∥w∥12(ℓ(z)+∑qrqℓq(z))\Phi_w(\ell(z),(\mathsf{r}_q\ell_q(z))_q)\le2n\lVert w\rVert_1^{2}\bigl(\ell(z)+\sum_q\mathsf{r}_q\ell_q(z)\bigr).

Integration. Writing Φw(… )=1Z∖UΦw(… )+1UΦw(… )\Phi_w(\dots)=\mathbf{1}_{\mathsf{Z}\setminus\mathsf{U}}\Phi_w(\dots)+\mathbf{1}_{\mathsf{U}}\Phi_w(\dots) and using the two pointwise bounds, additivity and monotonicity, ∫ZΦw(ℓ,r1ℓ1,…,rnℓn) dν≤(1+δ)∫Z∖Uℓ(∑qwq(1−rqLq))2dν+2n∥w∥12[∫Uℓ dν+∑qrq∫Uℓq dν].\int_{\mathsf{Z}}\Phi_w(\ell,\mathsf{r}_1\ell_1,\dots,\mathsf{r}_n\ell_n)\,d\nu\le(1+\delta)\int_{\mathsf{Z}\setminus\mathsf{U}}\ell\Bigl(\sum_qw_q(1-\mathsf{r}_qL_q)\Bigr)^{2}d\nu+2n\lVert w\rVert_1^{2}\Bigl[\int_{\mathsf{U}}\ell\,d\nu+\sum_q\mathsf{r}_q\int_{\mathsf{U}}\ell_q\,d\nu\Bigr]. The first integral is at most the same integral over Z\mathsf{Z} (monotonicity). For the bracket: 1U≤∑q1Uq\mathbf{1}_{\mathsf{U}}\le\sum_q\mathbf{1}_{\mathsf{U}_q} pointwise, so ∫Uℓ dν≤∑qπq=π\int_{\mathsf{U}}\ell\,d\nu\le\sum_q\pi_q=\pi; and by claim 3 with A=UA=\mathsf{U}, ∫Uℓq dν≤∫Uℓ dν+Vq1/2(∫Uℓ dν)1/2≤π+Vq1/2π1/2\int_{\mathsf{U}}\ell_q\,d\nu\le\int_{\mathsf{U}}\ell\,d\nu+V_q^{1/2}(\int_{\mathsf{U}}\ell\,d\nu)^{1/2}\le\pi+V_q^{1/2}\pi^{1/2}, the square root being nondecreasing on [0,∞)[0,\infty) (Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root: if 0≤s≤t0\le s\le t then s1/2≤t1/2s^{1/2}\le t^{1/2}, since otherwise squaring would give s>ts>t). Substituting gives the split bound, together with the two refinements stated after it. ■\blacksquare

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…