TheoremBase

The lower bound follows from the semicircular upper bound on the free entropy together with M(lambda) <= dR2dR^2 and monotonicity of the logarithm; closedness of sublevel sets is the upper semicontinuity clause applied with c replaced by -c.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. We work in Free Products, Semicircular Laws, the Free Heat Flow, Free Fisher Information and Free Entropy: Standing Notation; note DΟ‡βŠ†Ξ£d\mathcal{D}_{\chi}\subseteq\Sigma_{d} by Voiculescu's Non-Microstates Free Entropy of a Noncommutative Law Β§domain, and βˆ’Ο‡βˆ—-\chi^{*} is real-valued on DΟ‡\mathcal{D}_{\chi} by Voiculescu's Non-Microstates Free Entropy of a Noncommutative Law Β§entropy, so (DΟ‡,βˆ’Ο‡βˆ—)(\mathcal{D}_{\chi},-\chi^{*}) is a pair of the kind considered in Free Entropy Penalties: Displacement Convexity with Minus the Conjugate Variables as Gradient. Since d∈Nd\in\mathbb{N}, d>0d>0.

Monotonicity of the logarithm. If x,yx,y are reals with 0<x≀y0<x\le y, then log⁑x≀log⁑y\log x\le\log y. Indeed, otherwise log⁑y<log⁑x\log y<\log x, and since exp⁑\exp is strictly increasing (claim 4 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function), y=exp⁑(log⁑y)<exp⁑(log⁑x)=xy=\exp(\log y)<\exp(\log x)=x by The Natural Logarithm, contradicting x≀yx\le y.

Clause 1 (lower bound). Let R>0R>0 be real and λ∈DΟ‡βˆ©Ξ£d,R\lambda\in\mathcal{D}_{\chi}\cap\Sigma_{d,R}. For j∈[d]j\in[d], the polynomial xj2=xwx_{j}^{2}=x_{w} with w=(j,j)w=(j,j) a word of length 22 is self-adjoint, so Ξ»(xj2)\lambda(x_{j}^{2}) is real by Basic Properties of Noncommutative Laws: Adjoints, the Self-Adjoint Pairing, Cauchy-Schwarz, Monotonicity in the Bound, and Laws of Constant Tuples Β§adjoint, and Ξ»(xj2)=Re⁑λ(xj2)β‰€βˆ£Ξ»(xw)βˆ£β‰€R2\lambda(x_{j}^{2})=\operatorname{Re}\lambda(x_{j}^{2})\le|\lambda(x_{w})|\le R^{2} by claim 6 of Properties of Complex Conjugation and Modulus and Noncommutative Laws of Finitely Many Self-Adjoint Variables with a Norm Bound Β§norm-bound. Summing over jj, M(Ξ»)≀dR2M(\lambda)\le dR^{2}. By The Free Entropy: the Semicircular Upper Bound, Semicircular Values, Smoothing, the de Bruijn Identity and Upper Semicontinuity Β§upper-bound, M(Ξ»)>0M(\lambda)>0 and

Ο‡βˆ—(Ξ»)≀d2log⁑(2Ο€e M(Ξ»)d).\chi^{*}(\lambda)\le\frac{d}{2}\log\Bigl(\frac{2\pi e\,M(\lambda)}{d}\Bigr).

Since 2Ο€e>02\pi e>0 (as recorded in Voiculescu's Non-Microstates Free Entropy of a Noncommutative Law) and 0<M(Ξ»)/d≀R20<M(\lambda)/d\le R^{2}, we get 0<2Ο€e M(Ξ»)/d≀2Ο€e R20<2\pi e\,M(\lambda)/d\le2\pi e\,R^{2} by claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and claim 5 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. By the monotonicity of the logarithm and claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field (multiplying by d/2β‰₯0d/2\ge0), Ο‡βˆ—(Ξ»)≀d2log⁑(2Ο€e R2)\chi^{*}(\lambda)\le\frac{d}{2}\log(2\pi e\,R^{2}), and by sign reversal (claim 4 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field),

βˆ’Ο‡βˆ—(Ξ»)β‰₯βˆ’d2log⁑(2Ο€e R2).-\chi^{*}(\lambda)\ge-\frac{d}{2}\log(2\pi e\,R^{2}).

Thus, for every real R>0R>0, the real number βˆ’d2log⁑(2Ο€e R2)-\frac{d}{2}\log(2\pi e\,R^{2}) is at most βˆ’Ο‡βˆ—(Ξ»)-\chi^{*}(\lambda) for every λ∈DΟ‡βˆ©Ξ£d,R\lambda\in\mathcal{D}_{\chi}\cap\Sigma_{d,R}, which is exactly what the lower bound clause of a free entropy penalty requires of the pair (DΟ‡,βˆ’Ο‡βˆ—)(\mathcal{D}_{\chi},-\chi^{*}) (the real number called ee there being βˆ’d2log⁑(2Ο€e R2)-\frac{d}{2}\log(2\pi e\,R^{2}), where ee inside the logarithm is exp⁑(1)\exp(1)).

Clause 2 (closed sublevel sets). Let R>0R>0 and cc be reals, and let (Ξ»k)k∈N(\lambda_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} be a sequence in DΟ‡βˆ©Ξ£d,R\mathcal{D}_{\chi}\cap\Sigma_{d,R} with βˆ’Ο‡βˆ—(Ξ»k)≀c-\chi^{*}(\lambda_{k})\le c for every kk that converges weak-star to some λ∈Σd\lambda\in\Sigma_{d}. By sign reversal (claim 4 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field), Ο‡βˆ—(Ξ»k)β‰₯βˆ’c\chi^{*}(\lambda_{k})\ge-c for every kk. Apply The Free Entropy: the Semicircular Upper Bound, Semicircular Values, Smoothing, the de Bruijn Identity and Upper Semicontinuity Β§upper-semicontinuous to the law Ξ»\lambda (with any real s>0s>0, say s=1s=1, which that clause does not use), the reals RR and βˆ’c-c, and the sequence (Ξ»k)k∈N(\lambda_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}}: it gives λ∈DΟ‡\lambda\in\mathcal{D}_{\chi} and Ο‡βˆ—(Ξ»)β‰₯βˆ’c\chi^{*}(\lambda)\ge-c, hence βˆ’Ο‡βˆ—(Ξ»)≀c-\chi^{*}(\lambda)\le c by sign reversal again. This is the closed sublevel set clause for the pair (DΟ‡,βˆ’Ο‡βˆ—)(\mathcal{D}_{\chi},-\chi^{*}), with E0=βˆ’Ο‡βˆ—\mathcal{E}_{0}=-\chi^{*} and D0=DΟ‡\mathcal{D}_{0}=\mathcal{D}_{\chi}.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…