TheoremBase

Dependent choice enters only through the outer-measure property of Lebesgue outer measure; rays split every set additively, so the Carathéodory sigma-algebra contains the Borel sets, and Lebesgue measure is the Carathéodory measure restricted to them. The intervals (-m, m] give sigma-finiteness and, with the half-open pi-system, uniqueness.

Proof

The axiom of dependent choice is used only in the proof of (ii), through Properties of Lebesgue Outer Measure on the Real Line (vii); every other step below is choice-free, given (ii), and the proof of (i), stated before the assumption of dependent choice, uses neither it nor (ii).

Proof of (ii). Since the axiom of dependent choice is assumed, λ∗\lambda^{*} is an outer measure on R\mathbb{R} by Properties of Lebesgue Outer Measure on the Real Line (vii).

Proof of (iii). By (ii), λ∗\lambda^{*} is an outer measure on R\mathbb{R}, so Carathéodory's Theorem: the Measurable Sets of an Outer Measure Form a σ-Algebra on Which It Is a Measure (i) and Carathéodory's Theorem: the Measurable Sets of an Outer Measure Form a σ-Algebra on Which It Is a Measure (ii) apply to it with X=RX=\mathbb{R}; write M=M(λ∗)\mathcal{M}=\mathcal{M}(\lambda^{*}). Let c∈Rc\in\mathbb{R}, and let E=(c,∞)E=(c,\infty) be the ray of Intervals of the Real Line (iii), a subset of R\mathbb{R}. For every A⊆RA\subseteq\mathbb{R}, and so in particular for every A⊆RA\subseteq\mathbb{R} with λ∗(A)<∞\lambda^{*}(A)<\infty,

λ∗(A∩E)+λ∗(A∖E)≤λ∗(A)\lambda^{*}(A\cap E)+\lambda^{*}(A\setminus E)\le\lambda^{*}(A)

by Properties of Lebesgue Outer Measure on the Real Line (v). Hence E∈ME\in\mathcal{M} by Carathéodory's Theorem: the Measurable Sets of an Outer Measure Form a σ-Algebra on Which It Is a Measure (i). So the set R={(c,∞):c∈R}\mathcal{R}=\{(c,\infty):c\in\mathbb{R}\}, a subset of P(R)\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}), satisfies R⊆M\mathcal{R}\subseteq\mathcal{M}. By Carathéodory's Theorem: the Measurable Sets of an Outer Measure Form a σ-Algebra on Which It Is a Measure (ii), M\mathcal{M} is a σ\sigma-algebra on R\mathbb{R}, so the σ\sigma-algebra generated by R\mathcal{R} satisfies σ(R)⊆M\sigma(\mathcal{R})\subseteq\mathcal{M} by Closure Properties of σ-Algebras, Intersections and Traces of σ-Algebras, and the Generated σ-Algebra (iv). Since B(R)=σ(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})=\sigma(\mathcal{R}) by Intervals Are Borel, and Rays, Half-Open Intervals and Rational Intervals Generate the Borel Sigma-Algebra of the Real Line (iii), we get B(R)⊆M\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})\subseteq\mathcal{M}; as the elements of M\mathcal{M} are exactly the λ∗\lambda^{*}-measurable subsets of R\mathbb{R} by Carathéodory Measurable Sets of an Outer Measure (ii), every Borel subset of R\mathbb{R} is Carathéodory measurable for λ∗\lambda^{*}.

Proof of (iv). Let μ=λ∗∣M\mu=\lambda^{*}|_{\mathcal{M}} be the restriction of λ∗\lambda^{*} to M\mathcal{M}; by Carathéodory's Theorem: the Measurable Sets of an Outer Measure Form a σ-Algebra on Which It Is a Measure (iv) it is a measure on (R,M)(\mathbb{R},\mathcal{M}). For every B∈B(R)B\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) we have B∈MB\in\mathcal{M} by (iii), so

λ(B)=λ∗(B)=μ(B),\lambda(B)=\lambda^{*}(B)=\mu(B),

the first equality by Lebesgue Measure on the Real Line (i) and the second by Domains and Restrictions of Maps (iii). By Lebesgue Measure on the Real Line (i), λ\lambda is a map B(R)→[0,∞]\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})\to[0,\infty]. First, ∅∈B(R)\emptyset\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) by Closure Properties of σ-Algebras, Intersections and Traces of σ-Algebras, and the Generated σ-Algebra (vi), so λ(∅)=μ(∅)=0\lambda(\emptyset)=\mu(\emptyset)=0 by Measure, Measure Space, and Probability Measure (i) applied to μ\mu. Next, let (Am)(A_{m}) be a pairwise disjoint sequence in B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}). As B(R)⊆M\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})\subseteq\mathcal{M} ((iii)), (Am)(A_{m}) is also a pairwise disjoint sequence in M\mathcal{M} (Sequences and Maps of Sets: Complements, Traces, Two-Term Sequences, the Disjointing Sequence, and Sequences in a Subset (v)). Its union U=⋃m∈NAmU=\bigcup_{m\in\mathbb{N}}A_{m} lies in B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) by σ-Algebra and Measurable Space (i), and countable additivity of μ\mu (Measure, Measure Space, and Probability Measure (i)) gives μ(U)=∑m∈Nμ(Am)\mu(U)=\sum_{m\in\mathbb{N}}\mu(A_{m}). As λ(U)=μ(U)\lambda(U)=\mu(U) and λ(Am)=μ(Am)\lambda(A_{m})=\mu(A_{m}) for every m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N}, the two series have the same terms, and therefore

λ(⋃m∈NAm)=∑m∈Nλ(Am).\lambda\Bigl(\bigcup_{m\in\mathbb{N}}A_{m}\Bigr)=\sum_{m\in\mathbb{N}}\lambda(A_{m}).

So λ\lambda is a measure on (R,B(R))(\mathbb{R},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})) by Measure, Measure Space, and Probability Measure (i).

Proof of (i). Let a,b∈Ra,b\in\mathbb{R} with a≤ba\le b, and let II be one of (a,b)(a,b), [a,b][a,b], [a,b)[a,b), (a,b](a,b]. Then I∈B(R)I\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) by Intervals Are Borel, and Rays, Half-Open Intervals and Rational Intervals Generate the Borel Sigma-Algebra of the Real Line (ii), so λ(I)=λ∗(I)\lambda(I)=\lambda^{*}(I) by Lebesgue Measure on the Real Line (i), and λ∗(I)=b−a\lambda^{*}(I)=b-a by Properties of Lebesgue Outer Measure on the Real Line (iv).

Proof of (v). For m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N} we have 0<m0<m in R\mathbb{R} by Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares (vi), hence −m<m-m<m. By Intervals of the Real Line as Defined Set Symbols, Typed Terms and Values of Maps (iii), applied with D=ND=\mathbb{N} and the maps m↦−mm\mapsto-m and m↦mm\mapsto m, there is exactly one map m↦Xmm\mapsto X_{m} from N\mathbb{N} to P(R)\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}) with Xm=(−m,m]X_{m}=(-m,m] for every m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N}. Each XmX_{m} lies in B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) by Intervals Are Borel, and Rays, Half-Open Intervals and Rational Intervals Generate the Borel Sigma-Algebra of the Real Line (ii), so (Xm)(X_{m}) is a sequence in B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) (Sequences and Maps of Sets: Complements, Traces, Two-Term Sequences, the Disjointing Sequence, and Sequences in a Subset (v)).

We show ⋃m∈NXm=R\bigcup_{m\in\mathbb{N}}X_{m}=\mathbb{R}, with the union of Indexed Families of Sets and Their Union, Intersection and Product (ii). Every element of the union lies in some Xm⊆RX_{m}\subseteq\mathbb{R}, so lies in R\mathbb{R}. Conversely, let x∈Rx\in\mathbb{R}. By The Real Numbers, with the Natural Numbers, Integers and Rationals Identified with Subsets of the Reals, and Completeness (ix), applied to ∣x∣|x|, there is n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N} with ∣x∣<n|x|<n; then −n<x<n-n<x<n by Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares (ix), so x∈(−n,n]=Xnx\in(-n,n]=X_{n}, and xx lies in the union by Indexed Families of Sets and Their Union, Intersection and Product (ii).

Finally, for m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N}, (i) with a=−ma=-m and b=mb=m gives λ(Xm)=m−(−m)\lambda(X_{m})=m-(-m), a real number, so λ(Xm)<∞\lambda(X_{m})<\infty by Small Facts about [0,∞]: Zero, Finiteness and Sums of Zeros (ii). Hence λ\lambda is σ\sigma-finite by Measure, Measure Space, and Probability Measure (iv).

Proof of (vi). Let ν\nu be as in (vi), and let E={∅}∪{(a,b]:a,b∈R, a<b}\mathcal{E}=\{\emptyset\}\cup\{(a,b]:a,b\in\mathbb{R},\ a<b\} be the set of Intervals Are Borel, and Rays, Half-Open Intervals and Rational Intervals Generate the Borel Sigma-Algebra of the Real Line (v). It is a π\pi-system on R\mathbb{R} by Intervals Are Borel, and Rays, Half-Open Intervals and Rational Intervals Generate the Borel Sigma-Algebra of the Real Line (v), and σ(E)=B(R)\sigma(\mathcal{E})=\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) by Intervals Are Borel, and Rays, Half-Open Intervals and Rational Intervals Generate the Borel Sigma-Algebra of the Real Line (iv). The measures λ\lambda (a measure by (iv)) and ν\nu agree on E\mathcal{E}: λ(∅)=0=ν(∅)\lambda(\emptyset)=0=\nu(\emptyset) by Measure, Measure Space, and Probability Measure (i), and for a,b∈Ra,b\in\mathbb{R} with a<ba<b, λ((a,b])=b−a\lambda((a,b])=b-a by (i) and ν((a,b])=b−a\nu((a,b])=b-a by hypothesis. Let (Xm)(X_{m}) be the sequence of the proof of (v). As −m<m-m<m, each Xm=(−m,m]X_{m}=(-m,m] lies in E\mathcal{E}, and E⊆P(R)\mathcal{E}\subseteq\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}), so (Xm)(X_{m}) is a sequence in E\mathcal{E} (Sequences and Maps of Sets: Complements, Traces, Two-Term Sequences, the Disjointing Sequence, and Sequences in a Subset (v)); its union is R\mathbb{R} and λ(Xm)<∞\lambda(X_{m})<\infty for every m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N}, both shown there. By Uniqueness of Measures Agreeing on a Generating π-System (ii), applied to (R,B(R))(\mathbb{R},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})), E\mathcal{E}, μ=λ\mu=\lambda, ν\nu and Em=XmE_{m}=X_{m}, we get ν(B)=λ(B)\nu(B)=\lambda(B) for every B∈B(R)B\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}). As ν\nu and λ\lambda are both maps B(R)→[0,∞]\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})\to[0,\infty] by Measure, Measure Space, and Probability Measure (i), ν=λ\nu=\lambda by Values, Restriction and Equality of a Map, and the Map u↦t(u)u\mapsto t(u) as a Defined Set Symbol (iv). ■\blacksquare

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…