Proof of Local Bounds, Semicontinuous Envelopes and Local Extrema Are Unchanged on the Trace of an Open Set
lemmalem:envelopes-open-trace-metric-2026aClaims 1, 4 and 5 are read off the definitions, using openness of to shrink a radius; claims 2 and 3 follow by applying the localisation lemma for envelopes twice on a closed ball small enough to lie inside .
Throughout, and denote the sets attached to a function and a point of its domain in Upper and Lower Semicontinuous Envelopes of a Real-Valued Function, the ambient metric space being . Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data appearing in its own statement, and is applied here to the data named at the point of use.
Claim 1. Suppose is bounded above near each point of and let . Then is nonempty by Upper and Lower Semicontinuous Envelopes of a Real-Valued Function §near-bounds: there are and a positive with for every with . Since , every with lies in and satisfies . Hence , so this set is nonempty; as was arbitrary, is bounded above near each point of . The statement for lower bounds is obtained in the same way from the sets and , with the inequalities in place of .
A radius adapted to . Let . Then , and is open in , so by Open Subset of a Metric Space there is a positive with . Put , so that and by claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, and put
If , then by the symmetry axiom, so by claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, whence by Open Ball in a Metric Space and therefore and . Thus . Consequently : the inclusion holds because , and the reverse because every lies in and satisfies . In particular and have the same domain and the same value at each point of it, so they are the same function. Finally , since by the metric axioms.
Claim 2. Suppose is bounded above near each point of , let , and let , , and be as above. We apply Semicontinuity and the Semicontinuous Envelopes are Local Notions twice, in both cases with the metric space , the point and the radius .
First, with the nonempty set and the function : the set called there is the set above, and claim 4 of that lemma gives for every with . Taking , which is legitimate because , we obtain
Secondly, with the set , which is nonempty and contains , and the function , which is bounded above near each point of by claim 1: the set called there is now , and claim 4 of that lemma gives
Since and are the same function, the left-hand sides of the two displays are equal, and therefore .
Claim 3. Suppose is bounded below near each point of and let . The argument of claim 2 applies verbatim, using the second half of claim 1 of the present lemma for the hypothesis on and claim 5 of Semicontinuity and the Semicontinuous Envelopes are Local Notions in place of claim 4; it yields .
Claim 4. Suppose first that has a local maximum at relative to . By Local Maximum of a Function Relative to a Subset of a Metric Space there is a positive such that every with satisfies . Since and , every with satisfies , so the same witnesses that has a local maximum at relative to .
Conversely, suppose has a local maximum at relative to , and let be a positive real number as in Local Maximum of a Function Relative to a Subset of a Metric Space for this local maximum. Since and is open in , there is a positive with by Open Subset of a Metric Space. Put , their minimum; by claim 2 of Elementary Properties of the Minimum of Two Elements, is or , hence positive, and by claim 1 of that lemma and . Let satisfy . Then by claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, so by Open Ball in a Metric Space and hence ; and by the same claim, so . Thus witnesses that has a local maximum at relative to .
Claim 5. The argument of claim 4 applies verbatim with Local Minimum of a Function Relative to a Subset of a Metric Space in place of Local Maximum of a Function Relative to a Subset of a Metric Space and the inequalities in place of .
Loading…
Prerequisites
29a247ff-103e-49e3-b232-474c283df598