Β· 10,396 chars Β· 34 deps Β· depth 25 Reason: Phase B: proof of separability of the Lebesgue spaces of the torus via rational dyadic step functions.
The dyadic cells partition the unit cell, by the integer part applied to scaled coordinates. Uniform continuity on the closed cell then lets a continuous periodic function be approximated uniformly by a dyadic step function with rational values.
Claim 1.Finiteness of Nkβ. Put Zkβ={aβZ:0β€aβ€2kβ1}, so that Nkβ is exactly the set of n-tuples with all entries in Zkβ. We show Zkβ is the image of the initial segment[2k] under the map lβ¦lβ1, natural numbers being read as real numbers through the canonical map as fixed in clause 1. If lβ[2k] then lβ1 is an integer by claim 2 of Arithmetic, Order and Discreteness of the Integers, and 1β€lβ€2k gives 0β€lβ1β€2kβ1, so lβ1βZkβ. Conversely let aβZkβ. Then a+1 is an integer with 0<a+1, so by claim 1 of Arithmetic, Order and Discreteness of the Integers it is the image of a natural number l; from a+1β€2k and the strict monotonicity of the canonical map we get lβ€2k, so lβ[2k] and a=lβ1. The set [2k] is finite by claim 1 of Basic Properties of Finite Sets, so Zkβ is finite by claim 4 there, and Nkβ is finite by Finiteness of Cartesian Products, Tuple Sets, and Permutation Sets.
The diameter bound. If x,yβQk,jβ then for every i both xiβ and yiβ lie between 2βkjiβ and 2βk(jiβ+1), so β£xiββyiββ£β€2βk, and hence (xiββyiβ)2=β£xiββyiββ£2β€(2βk)2 by claim 4 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field and the squaring fact recorded above. Summing, β₯xβyβ₯2β€n(2βk)2=(Οnβ2βk)2 by clause 3, and both β₯xβyβ₯ and Οnβ2βk are nonnegative, so β₯xβyβ₯β€Οnβ2βk by the converse half of that fact.
The correspondence. Since the cells Qk,jβ, jβNkβ, are pairwise disjoint with union Q, a family (cjβ)jβNkββ in Q determines a well-defined map s:QβR with s(x)=cjβ for xβQk,jβ, and this s lies in Dkβ. Conversely each Qk,jβ is nonempty, containing the point whose ith coordinate is 2βkjiβ, so a member of Dkβ determines its family uniquely.
For each jβNkβ let yj be the point of Rn whose ith coordinate is 2βkjiβ; it lies in Qk,jββQβQβ. By claim 1 of The Rational Numbers are Dense in the Real Numbers there is a rational cjβ with u(yj)βΞ΅/4<cjβ<u(yj)+Ξ΅/4, hence β£cjββu(yj)β£<Ξ΅/4 by claim 9 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field; the choice of one such cjβ for each of the finitely many j is a finite choice. Let sβDkβ be the member determined by the family (cjβ)jβNkββ, as in claim 1.
Let xβQ and let jβNkβ be the index with xβQk,jβ. Both x and yj lie in Qk,jβ, so dEβ(x,yj)=β₯xβyjβ₯β€Οnβ2βk<Ξ΄ by claim 1, and both lie in Qβ; hence β£u(x)βu(yj)β£<Ξ΅/4 and
Claim 4. Let FβLp(Tn) and choose a representative f with F=[f]. For each kβN, claim 3 applied with Ξ΅=1/k provides skββD with β₯Fβ[skβ]β₯Lp(Tn)ββ€1/k; the choice of one such skβ for each k uses countable choice. Given a positive real Ξ΅, The Archimedean Property of the Real Numbers provides k0ββN with 1<k0βΞ΅, and then β₯Fβ[skβ]β₯Lp(Tn)β<Ξ΅ for every kβ₯k0β. So ([skβ])kβNβ converges to F in the metric of Lp(Tn), and F lies in the closure of {[s]:sβD} by Sequential Characterization of the Closure in a Metric Space. As F was arbitrary, that set is dense. Being countable by claim 2, it witnesses that Lp(Tn) is separable.