Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. For a function Ο \psi Ο of class C 2 C^{2} C 2 on D D D , claims 3 and 1 of Constants, Coordinate Functions, Sums and Products of C k C^k C k Functions on a Euclidean Open Set , applied to first and then to second partial derivatives, show that Ο + c P \psi+cP Ο + c P and Ο β c P \psi-cP Ο β c P are of class C 2 C^{2} C 2 on D D D with
D ( Ο Β± c P ) ( x ) = D Ο ( x ) Β± c D P ( x ) , D 2 ( Ο Β± c P ) ( x ) = D 2 Ο ( x ) Β± c D 2 P ( x ) ( x β D ) . (1) D(\psi\pm cP)(x)=D\psi(x)\pm cDP(x),\qquad D^{2}(\psi\pm cP)(x)=D^{2}\psi(x)\pm cD^{2}P(x)\qquad(x\in D). \tag{1} D ( Ο Β± c P ) ( x ) = D Ο ( x ) Β± cD P ( x ) , D 2 ( Ο Β± c P ) ( x ) = D 2 Ο ( x ) Β± c D 2 P ( x ) ( x β D ) . ( 1 )
We also note the inversion identity: F c F_{c} F c β is a second-order equation operator on D D D , so ( F c ) β c (F_{c})_{-c} ( F c β ) β c β is defined by the same formula, and for all ( x , r , p , X ) (x,r,p,X) ( x , r , p , X ) the vector-space axioms give
( F c ) β c ( x , r , p , X ) = F c ( x , r β c P ( x ) , p β c D P ( x ) , X β c D 2 P ( x ) ) = F ( x , r , p , X ) . (2) (F_{c})_{-c}(x,r,p,X)=F_{c}\bigl(x,r-cP(x),p-cDP(x),X-cD^{2}P(x)\bigr)=F(x,r,p,X). \tag{2} ( F c β ) β c β ( x , r , p , X ) = F c β ( x , r β c P ( x ) , p β cD P ( x ) , X β c D 2 P ( x ) ) = F ( x , r , p , X ) . ( 2 )
Finally, β c P -cP β c P is of class C 2 C^{2} C 2 on D D D by claim 3 of Constants, Coordinate Functions, Sums and Products of C k C^k C k Functions on a Euclidean Open Set , hence continuous at every point of D D D relative to D D D by Continuity of the Value, Gradient and Hessian Maps of a Differentiable Function Β§value , hence upper and lower semicontinuous on D D D by claim 2 of Semicontinuity Under Negation and Characterization of Continuity .
Claim 1. If u u u is a viscosity subsolution of F F F , then u β c P u-cP u β c P is one of F c F_{c} F c β . The function u β c P u-cP u β c P is upper semicontinuous on D D D by claim 1 of Sums and Nonnegative Multiples of Semicontinuous Functions . Let Ο \psi Ο be of class C 2 C^{2} C 2 on D D D and let x 0 β D x_{0}\in D x 0 β β D be a point at which ( u β c P ) β Ο (u-cP)-\psi ( u β c P ) β Ο has a local maximum relative to D D D . Since ( u β c P ) β Ο = u β ( Ο + c P ) (u-cP)-\psi=u-(\psi+cP) ( u β c P ) β Ο = u β ( Ο + c P ) pointwise, u β ( Ο + c P ) u-(\psi+cP) u β ( Ο + c P ) has a local maximum at x 0 x_{0} x 0 β , and Ο + c P \psi+cP Ο + c P is of class C 2 C^{2} C 2 on D D D ; so the subsolution property of u u u and (1) give
F c ( x 0 , u ( x 0 ) β c P ( x 0 ) , D Ο ( x 0 ) , D 2 Ο ( x 0 ) ) = F ( x 0 , u ( x 0 ) , D Ο ( x 0 ) + c D P ( x 0 ) , D 2 Ο ( x 0 ) + c D 2 P ( x 0 ) ) β€ 0. F_{c}\bigl(x_{0},u(x_{0})-cP(x_{0}),D\psi(x_{0}),D^{2}\psi(x_{0})\bigr)=F\bigl(x_{0},u(x_{0}),D\psi(x_{0})+cDP(x_{0}),D^{2}\psi(x_{0})+cD^{2}P(x_{0})\bigr)\le0 . F c β ( x 0 β , u ( x 0 β ) β c P ( x 0 β ) , D Ο ( x 0 β ) , D 2 Ο ( x 0 β ) ) = F ( x 0 β , u ( x 0 β ) , D Ο ( x 0 β ) + cD P ( x 0 β ) , D 2 Ο ( x 0 β ) + c D 2 P ( x 0 β ) ) β€ 0.
Conversely , if u β c P u-cP u β c P is a viscosity subsolution of F c F_{c} F c β , the implication just proved, applied to the operator F c F_{c} F c β , the constant β c -c β c and the function u β c P u-cP u β c P , shows that ( u β c P ) β ( β c ) P = u (u-cP)-(-c)P=u ( u β c P ) β ( β c ) P = u is a viscosity subsolution of ( F c ) β c (F_{c})_{-c} ( F c β ) β c β , which is F F F by (2).
Claim 2. Identical, with lower semicontinuity (claim 3 of Sums and Nonnegative Multiples of Semicontinuous Functions ), local minima and the reversed inequality.
Claim 3. By (1) with Ο = Ο \psi=\varphi Ο = Ο and the definition of F c F_{c} F c β , for every x β D x\in D x β D ,
F c ( x , Ο ( x ) β c P ( x ) , D ( Ο β c P ) ( x ) , D 2 ( Ο β c P ) ( x ) ) = F ( x , Ο ( x ) , D Ο ( x ) , D 2 Ο ( x ) ) , F_{c}\bigl(x,\varphi(x)-cP(x),D(\varphi-cP)(x),D^{2}(\varphi-cP)(x)\bigr)=F\bigl(x,\varphi(x),D\varphi(x),D^{2}\varphi(x)\bigr), F c β ( x , Ο ( x ) β c P ( x ) , D ( Ο β c P ) ( x ) , D 2 ( Ο β c P ) ( x ) ) = F ( x , Ο ( x ) , D Ο ( x ) , D 2 Ο ( x ) ) ,
so the inequalities of Classical Subsolution and Supersolution of a Second-Order Equation for Ο \varphi Ο and F F F and for Ο β c P \varphi-cP Ο β c P and F c F_{c} F c β hold at the same points.
Claim 4. Fix x β D x\in D x β D and write Ξ¦ x ( r , p , X ) = ( r + c P ( x ) , p + c D P ( x ) , X + c D 2 P ( x ) ) \Phi_{x}(r,p,X)=(r+cP(x),p+cDP(x),X+cD^{2}P(x)) Ξ¦ x β ( r , p , X ) = ( r + c P ( x ) , p + cD P ( x ) , X + c D 2 P ( x )) , so that F c ( x , r , p , X ) = F ( x , Ξ¦ x ( r , p , X ) ) F_{c}(x,r,p,X)=F(x,\Phi_{x}(r,p,X)) F c β ( x , r , p , X ) = F ( x , Ξ¦ x β ( r , p , X )) .
Degenerate ellipticity. If X βͺ― Y X\preceq Y X βͺ― Y , then X + c D 2 P ( x ) βͺ― Y + c D 2 P ( x ) X+cD^{2}P(x)\preceq Y+cD^{2}P(x) X + c D 2 P ( x ) βͺ― Y + c D 2 P ( x ) by Second-Order Equations on Euclidean Open Sets Β§matrices , so degenerate ellipticity of F F F gives F c ( x , r , p , Y ) β€ F c ( x , r , p , X ) F_{c}(x,r,p,Y)\le F_{c}(x,r,p,X) F c β ( x , r , p , Y ) β€ F c β ( x , r , p , X ) .
Strict properness. Condition 1 of Strictly Proper Second-Order Equation Operator is the previous paragraph. If s β€ r s\le r s β€ r , then s + c P ( x ) β€ r + c P ( x ) s+cP(x)\le r+cP(x) s + c P ( x ) β€ r + c P ( x ) and ( r + c P ( x ) ) β ( s + c P ( x ) ) = r β s (r+cP(x))-(s+cP(x))=r-s ( r + c P ( x )) β ( s + c P ( x )) = r β s , so condition 2 for F F F at ( x , s + c P ( x ) , p + c D P ( x ) , X + c D 2 P ( x ) ) (x,s+cP(x),p+cDP(x),X+cD^{2}P(x)) ( x , s + c P ( x ) , p + cD P ( x ) , X + c D 2 P ( x )) gives Ξ³ ( r β s ) β€ F c ( x , r , p , X ) β F c ( x , s , p , X ) \gamma(r-s)\le F_{c}(x,r,p,X)-F_{c}(x,s,p,X) Ξ³ ( r β s ) β€ F c β ( x , r , p , X ) β F c β ( x , s , p , X ) .
Convexity. For 0 β€ t β€ 1 0\le t\le1 0 β€ t β€ 1 the vector-space axioms give Ξ¦ x ( ( 1 β t ) ( r , p , X ) + t ( s , q , Y ) ) = ( 1 β t ) Ξ¦ x ( r , p , X ) + t Ξ¦ x ( s , q , Y ) \Phi_{x}\bigl((1-t)(r,p,X)+t(s,q,Y)\bigr)=(1-t)\Phi_{x}(r,p,X)+t\Phi_{x}(s,q,Y) Ξ¦ x β ( ( 1 β t ) ( r , p , X ) + t ( s , q , Y ) ) = ( 1 β t ) Ξ¦ x β ( r , p , X ) + t Ξ¦ x β ( s , q , Y ) componentwise, since ( 1 β t ) + t = 1 (1-t)+t=1 ( 1 β t ) + t = 1 ; so the convexity inequality of Second-Order Equation Operator Convex in the Value, Gradient and Matrix Variables for F F F at the triples Ξ¦ x ( r , p , X ) \Phi_{x}(r,p,X) Ξ¦ x β ( r , p , X ) and Ξ¦ x ( s , q , Y ) \Phi_{x}(s,q,Y) Ξ¦ x β ( s , q , Y ) is the convexity inequality for F c F_{c} F c β at ( r , p , X ) (r,p,X) ( r , p , X ) and ( s , q , Y ) (s,q,Y) ( s , q , Y ) .
Continuity. Let ( x 0 , r 0 , p 0 , X 0 ) (x_{0},r_{0},p_{0},X_{0}) ( x 0 β , r 0 β , p 0 β , X 0 β ) be a quadruple and Ξ΅ \varepsilon Ξ΅ positive. By continuity of F F F at ( x 0 , Ξ¦ x 0 ( r 0 , p 0 , X 0 ) ) (x_{0},\Phi_{x_{0}}(r_{0},p_{0},X_{0})) ( x 0 β , Ξ¦ x 0 β β ( r 0 β , p 0 β , X 0 β )) (Continuity of a Second-Order Equation Operator Β§at-point ) there is a positive Ξ· \eta Ξ· such that every quadruple whose four components are within Ξ· \eta Ξ· of those of ( x 0 , Ξ¦ x 0 ( r 0 , p 0 , X 0 ) ) (x_{0},\Phi_{x_{0}}(r_{0},p_{0},X_{0})) ( x 0 β , Ξ¦ x 0 β β ( r 0 β , p 0 β , X 0 β )) , in d E d_{E} d E β , β£ β
β£ |\cdot| β£ β
β£ , β₯ β
β₯ \lVert\cdot\rVert β₯ β
β₯ and d S ( n ) d_{\mathcal{S}(n)} d S ( n ) β respectively, has F F F -value within Ξ΅ \varepsilon Ξ΅ of F ( x 0 , Ξ¦ x 0 ( r 0 , p 0 , X 0 ) ) F(x_{0},\Phi_{x_{0}}(r_{0},p_{0},X_{0})) F ( x 0 β , Ξ¦ x 0 β β ( r 0 β , p 0 β , X 0 β )) . Put Ξ· β² = Ξ· β ( 2 ( β£ c β£ + 1 ) ) β 1 \eta'=\eta\,(2(|c|+1))^{-1} Ξ· β² = Ξ· ( 2 ( β£ c β£ + 1 ) ) β 1 , positive. By claims Continuity of the Value, Gradient and Hessian Maps of a Differentiable Function Β§value and Continuity of the Value, Gradient and Hessian Maps of a Differentiable Function Β§hessian of Continuity of the Value, Gradient and Hessian Maps of a Differentiable Function there is a positive Ξ΄ 1 \delta_{1} Ξ΄ 1 β such that every y β D y\in D y β D with d E ( y , x 0 ) < Ξ΄ 1 d_{E}(y,x_{0})<\delta_{1} d E β ( y , x 0 β ) < Ξ΄ 1 β satisfies β£ P ( y ) β P ( x 0 ) β£ < Ξ· β² |P(y)-P(x_{0})|<\eta' β£ P ( y ) β P ( x 0 β ) β£ < Ξ· β² , β₯ D P ( y ) β D P ( x 0 ) β₯ < Ξ· β² \lVert DP(y)-DP(x_{0})\rVert<\eta' β₯ D P ( y ) β D P ( x 0 β )β₯ < Ξ· β² and d S ( n ) ( D 2 P ( y ) , D 2 P ( x 0 ) ) < Ξ· β² d_{\mathcal{S}(n)}(D^{2}P(y),D^{2}P(x_{0}))<\eta' d S ( n ) β ( D 2 P ( y ) , D 2 P ( x 0 β )) < Ξ· β² . Let Ξ΄ \delta Ξ΄ be the least of Ξ΄ 1 \delta_{1} Ξ΄ 1 β and Ξ· 2 \tfrac{\eta}{2} 2 Ξ· β . If d E ( y , x 0 ) d_{E}(y,x_{0}) d E β ( y , x 0 β ) , β£ s β r 0 β£ |s-r_{0}| β£ s β r 0 β β£ , β₯ q β p 0 β₯ \lVert q-p_{0}\rVert β₯ q β p 0 β β₯ and d S ( n ) ( Y , X 0 ) d_{\mathcal{S}(n)}(Y,X_{0}) d S ( n ) β ( Y , X 0 β ) are all less than Ξ΄ \delta Ξ΄ , then by the triangle inequalities and homogeneity (claims 4 and 5 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field , claims 5 and 6 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on R n \mathbb{R}^n R n , claim 5 of Properties of the Norm of a Symmetric Real Matrix , with d S ( n ) ( A , B ) = β₯ A β B β₯ d_{\mathcal{S}(n)}(A,B)=\lVert A-B\rVert d S ( n ) β ( A , B ) = β₯ A β B β₯ by Second-Order Equations on Euclidean Open Sets Β§matrices )
β£ ( s + c P ( y ) ) β ( r 0 + c P ( x 0 ) ) β£ β€ β£ s β r 0 β£ + β£ c β£ β β£ P ( y ) β P ( x 0 ) β£ < Ξ· 2 + β£ c β£ Ξ· β² < Ξ· , \bigl|(s+cP(y))-(r_{0}+cP(x_{0}))\bigr|\le|s-r_{0}|+|c|\,|P(y)-P(x_{0})|<\tfrac{\eta}{2}+|c|\eta'<\eta, β ( s + c P ( y )) β ( r 0 β + c P ( x 0 β )) β β€ β£ s β r 0 β β£ + β£ c β£ β£ P ( y ) β P ( x 0 β ) β£ < 2 Ξ· β + β£ c β£ Ξ· β² < Ξ· ,
and in the same way β₯ ( q + c D P ( y ) ) β ( p 0 + c D P ( x 0 ) ) β₯ < Ξ· \lVert(q+cDP(y))-(p_{0}+cDP(x_{0}))\rVert<\eta β₯( q + cD P ( y )) β ( p 0 β + cD P ( x 0 β ))β₯ < Ξ· and d S ( n ) ( Y + c D 2 P ( y ) , X 0 + c D 2 P ( x 0 ) ) < Ξ· d_{\mathcal{S}(n)}(Y+cD^{2}P(y),X_{0}+cD^{2}P(x_{0}))<\eta d S ( n ) β ( Y + c D 2 P ( y ) , X 0 β + c D 2 P ( x 0 β )) < Ξ· , while d E ( y , x 0 ) < Ξ· d_{E}(y,x_{0})<\eta d E β ( y , x 0 β ) < Ξ· . Hence β£ F c ( y , s , q , Y ) β F c ( x 0 , r 0 , p 0 , X 0 ) β£ < Ξ΅ |F_{c}(y,s,q,Y)-F_{c}(x_{0},r_{0},p_{0},X_{0})|<\varepsilon β£ F c β ( y , s , q , Y ) β F c β ( x 0 β , r 0 β , p 0 β , X 0 β ) β£ < Ξ΅ , and F c F_{c} F c β is continuous by Continuity of a Second-Order Equation Operator Β§continuous .