TheoremBase

Proof of Gauge Covariance under Subtraction of a Multiple of a C2C^2 Function: Viscosity and Classical Sub- and Supersolutions and the Structural Properties of the Operator

lemmalem:gauge-weighted-penalty-euclidean-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron Β·
Verified by 0 users Β· Flagged by 0 users
Β· 5,453 chars Β· 12 deps Β· depth 22 Reason: Phase F: proof of gauge covariance.

Adding cP to a test function converts the test data of u-cP for FcF_c into those of u for F; the converse uses (F_c)_{-c}=F, and the structural properties pass through the affine change of the last three arguments.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. For a function ψ\psi of class C2C^{2} on DD, claims 3 and 1 of Constants, Coordinate Functions, Sums and Products of CkC^k Functions on a Euclidean Open Set, applied to first and then to second partial derivatives, show that ψ+cP\psi+cP and Οˆβˆ’cP\psi-cP are of class C2C^{2} on DD with

D(ψ±cP)(x)=Dψ(x)±cDP(x),D2(ψ±cP)(x)=D2ψ(x)±cD2P(x)(x∈D).(1)D(\psi\pm cP)(x)=D\psi(x)\pm cDP(x),\qquad D^{2}(\psi\pm cP)(x)=D^{2}\psi(x)\pm cD^{2}P(x)\qquad(x\in D). \tag{1}

We also note the inversion identity: FcF_{c} is a second-order equation operator on DD, so (Fc)βˆ’c(F_{c})_{-c} is defined by the same formula, and for all (x,r,p,X)(x,r,p,X) the vector-space axioms give

(Fc)βˆ’c(x,r,p,X)=Fc(x,rβˆ’cP(x),pβˆ’cDP(x),Xβˆ’cD2P(x))=F(x,r,p,X).(2)(F_{c})_{-c}(x,r,p,X)=F_{c}\bigl(x,r-cP(x),p-cDP(x),X-cD^{2}P(x)\bigr)=F(x,r,p,X). \tag{2}

Finally, βˆ’cP-cP is of class C2C^{2} on DD by claim 3 of Constants, Coordinate Functions, Sums and Products of CkC^k Functions on a Euclidean Open Set, hence continuous at every point of DD relative to DD by Continuity of the Value, Gradient and Hessian Maps of a Differentiable Function Β§value, hence upper and lower semicontinuous on DD by claim 2 of Semicontinuity Under Negation and Characterization of Continuity.

Claim 1. If uu is a viscosity subsolution of FF, then uβˆ’cPu-cP is one of FcF_{c}. The function uβˆ’cPu-cP is upper semicontinuous on DD by claim 1 of Sums and Nonnegative Multiples of Semicontinuous Functions. Let ψ\psi be of class C2C^{2} on DD and let x0∈Dx_{0}\in D be a point at which (uβˆ’cP)βˆ’Οˆ(u-cP)-\psi has a local maximum relative to DD. Since (uβˆ’cP)βˆ’Οˆ=uβˆ’(ψ+cP)(u-cP)-\psi=u-(\psi+cP) pointwise, uβˆ’(ψ+cP)u-(\psi+cP) has a local maximum at x0x_{0}, and ψ+cP\psi+cP is of class C2C^{2} on DD; so the subsolution property of uu and (1) give

Fc(x0,u(x0)βˆ’cP(x0),Dψ(x0),D2ψ(x0))=F(x0,u(x0),Dψ(x0)+cDP(x0),D2ψ(x0)+cD2P(x0))≀0.F_{c}\bigl(x_{0},u(x_{0})-cP(x_{0}),D\psi(x_{0}),D^{2}\psi(x_{0})\bigr)=F\bigl(x_{0},u(x_{0}),D\psi(x_{0})+cDP(x_{0}),D^{2}\psi(x_{0})+cD^{2}P(x_{0})\bigr)\le0 .

Conversely, if uβˆ’cPu-cP is a viscosity subsolution of FcF_{c}, the implication just proved, applied to the operator FcF_{c}, the constant βˆ’c-c and the function uβˆ’cPu-cP, shows that (uβˆ’cP)βˆ’(βˆ’c)P=u(u-cP)-(-c)P=u is a viscosity subsolution of (Fc)βˆ’c(F_{c})_{-c}, which is FF by (2).

Claim 2. Identical, with lower semicontinuity (claim 3 of Sums and Nonnegative Multiples of Semicontinuous Functions), local minima and the reversed inequality.

Claim 3. By (1) with ψ=Ο†\psi=\varphi and the definition of FcF_{c}, for every x∈Dx\in D,

Fc(x,Ο†(x)βˆ’cP(x),D(Ο†βˆ’cP)(x),D2(Ο†βˆ’cP)(x))=F(x,Ο†(x),DΟ†(x),D2Ο†(x)),F_{c}\bigl(x,\varphi(x)-cP(x),D(\varphi-cP)(x),D^{2}(\varphi-cP)(x)\bigr)=F\bigl(x,\varphi(x),D\varphi(x),D^{2}\varphi(x)\bigr),

so the inequalities of Classical Subsolution and Supersolution of a Second-Order Equation for Ο†\varphi and FF and for Ο†βˆ’cP\varphi-cP and FcF_{c} hold at the same points.

Claim 4. Fix x∈Dx\in D and write Φx(r,p,X)=(r+cP(x),p+cDP(x),X+cD2P(x))\Phi_{x}(r,p,X)=(r+cP(x),p+cDP(x),X+cD^{2}P(x)), so that Fc(x,r,p,X)=F(x,Φx(r,p,X))F_{c}(x,r,p,X)=F(x,\Phi_{x}(r,p,X)).

Degenerate ellipticity. If Xβͺ―YX\preceq Y, then X+cD2P(x)βͺ―Y+cD2P(x)X+cD^{2}P(x)\preceq Y+cD^{2}P(x) by Second-Order Equations on Euclidean Open Sets Β§matrices, so degenerate ellipticity of FF gives Fc(x,r,p,Y)≀Fc(x,r,p,X)F_{c}(x,r,p,Y)\le F_{c}(x,r,p,X).

Strict properness. Condition 1 of Strictly Proper Second-Order Equation Operator is the previous paragraph. If s≀rs\le r, then s+cP(x)≀r+cP(x)s+cP(x)\le r+cP(x) and (r+cP(x))βˆ’(s+cP(x))=rβˆ’s(r+cP(x))-(s+cP(x))=r-s, so condition 2 for FF at (x,s+cP(x),p+cDP(x),X+cD2P(x))(x,s+cP(x),p+cDP(x),X+cD^{2}P(x)) gives Ξ³(rβˆ’s)≀Fc(x,r,p,X)βˆ’Fc(x,s,p,X)\gamma(r-s)\le F_{c}(x,r,p,X)-F_{c}(x,s,p,X).

Convexity. For 0≀t≀10\le t\le1 the vector-space axioms give Ξ¦x((1βˆ’t)(r,p,X)+t(s,q,Y))=(1βˆ’t)Ξ¦x(r,p,X)+tΞ¦x(s,q,Y)\Phi_{x}\bigl((1-t)(r,p,X)+t(s,q,Y)\bigr)=(1-t)\Phi_{x}(r,p,X)+t\Phi_{x}(s,q,Y) componentwise, since (1βˆ’t)+t=1(1-t)+t=1; so the convexity inequality of Second-Order Equation Operator Convex in the Value, Gradient and Matrix Variables for FF at the triples Ξ¦x(r,p,X)\Phi_{x}(r,p,X) and Ξ¦x(s,q,Y)\Phi_{x}(s,q,Y) is the convexity inequality for FcF_{c} at (r,p,X)(r,p,X) and (s,q,Y)(s,q,Y).

Continuity. Let (x0,r0,p0,X0)(x_{0},r_{0},p_{0},X_{0}) be a quadruple and Ξ΅\varepsilon positive. By continuity of FF at (x0,Ξ¦x0(r0,p0,X0))(x_{0},\Phi_{x_{0}}(r_{0},p_{0},X_{0})) (Continuity of a Second-Order Equation Operator Β§at-point) there is a positive Ξ·\eta such that every quadruple whose four components are within Ξ·\eta of those of (x0,Ξ¦x0(r0,p0,X0))(x_{0},\Phi_{x_{0}}(r_{0},p_{0},X_{0})), in dEd_{E}, βˆ£β‹…βˆ£|\cdot|, βˆ₯β‹…βˆ₯\lVert\cdot\rVert and dS(n)d_{\mathcal{S}(n)} respectively, has FF-value within Ξ΅\varepsilon of F(x0,Ξ¦x0(r0,p0,X0))F(x_{0},\Phi_{x_{0}}(r_{0},p_{0},X_{0})). Put Ξ·β€²=η (2(∣c∣+1))βˆ’1\eta'=\eta\,(2(|c|+1))^{-1}, positive. By claims Continuity of the Value, Gradient and Hessian Maps of a Differentiable Function Β§value and Continuity of the Value, Gradient and Hessian Maps of a Differentiable Function Β§hessian of Continuity of the Value, Gradient and Hessian Maps of a Differentiable Function there is a positive Ξ΄1\delta_{1} such that every y∈Dy\in D with dE(y,x0)<Ξ΄1d_{E}(y,x_{0})<\delta_{1} satisfies ∣P(y)βˆ’P(x0)∣<Ξ·β€²|P(y)-P(x_{0})|<\eta', βˆ₯DP(y)βˆ’DP(x0)βˆ₯<Ξ·β€²\lVert DP(y)-DP(x_{0})\rVert<\eta' and dS(n)(D2P(y),D2P(x0))<Ξ·β€²d_{\mathcal{S}(n)}(D^{2}P(y),D^{2}P(x_{0}))<\eta'. Let Ξ΄\delta be the least of Ξ΄1\delta_{1} and Ξ·2\tfrac{\eta}{2}. If dE(y,x0)d_{E}(y,x_{0}), ∣sβˆ’r0∣|s-r_{0}|, βˆ₯qβˆ’p0βˆ₯\lVert q-p_{0}\rVert and dS(n)(Y,X0)d_{\mathcal{S}(n)}(Y,X_{0}) are all less than Ξ΄\delta, then by the triangle inequalities and homogeneity (claims 4 and 5 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, claims 5 and 6 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, claim 5 of Properties of the Norm of a Symmetric Real Matrix, with dS(n)(A,B)=βˆ₯Aβˆ’Bβˆ₯d_{\mathcal{S}(n)}(A,B)=\lVert A-B\rVert by Second-Order Equations on Euclidean Open Sets Β§matrices)

∣(s+cP(y))βˆ’(r0+cP(x0))βˆ£β‰€βˆ£sβˆ’r0∣+∣cβˆ£β€‰βˆ£P(y)βˆ’P(x0)∣<Ξ·2+∣cβˆ£Ξ·β€²<Ξ·,\bigl|(s+cP(y))-(r_{0}+cP(x_{0}))\bigr|\le|s-r_{0}|+|c|\,|P(y)-P(x_{0})|<\tfrac{\eta}{2}+|c|\eta'<\eta,

and in the same way βˆ₯(q+cDP(y))βˆ’(p0+cDP(x0))βˆ₯<Ξ·\lVert(q+cDP(y))-(p_{0}+cDP(x_{0}))\rVert<\eta and dS(n)(Y+cD2P(y),X0+cD2P(x0))<Ξ·d_{\mathcal{S}(n)}(Y+cD^{2}P(y),X_{0}+cD^{2}P(x_{0}))<\eta, while dE(y,x0)<Ξ·d_{E}(y,x_{0})<\eta. Hence ∣Fc(y,s,q,Y)βˆ’Fc(x0,r0,p0,X0)∣<Ξ΅|F_{c}(y,s,q,Y)-F_{c}(x_{0},r_{0},p_{0},X_{0})|<\varepsilon, and FcF_{c} is continuous by Continuity of a Second-Order Equation Operator Β§continuous.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Comments

Loading…