TheoremBase

Proof

Throughout we use the properties of ι\iota recorded in Properties of the Canonical Map from the Natural Numbers to an Ordered Field and the elementary order arithmetic of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. Rearrangements of sums and products below use the commutativity and associativity of the addition and multiplication of the field R\mathbb{R}, the identity a⋅1=aa\cdot 1=a, and the identity a a−1=1a\,a^{-1}=1 valid for a≠0a\ne 0, all part of Field.

1. Unboundedness. Suppose, for contradiction, that there is x∈Rx\in\mathbb{R} with ι(n)≤x\iota(n)\le x for every n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}. Let

E={ι(n):n∈N}E=\{\iota(n):n\in\mathbb{N}\}

be the image of ι\iota. Then EE is nonempty, since ι(1)∈E\iota(1)\in E, and xx is an upper bound for EE. By the least upper bound property stated in The Real Numbers the set EE has a least upper bound, unique by Uniqueness of the Supremum and of the Infimum; write c=sup⁡Ec=\sup E.

Statement 6 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives 0<10<1, so statement 4 of the same result gives −1<0-1<0 and then statement 1 gives c−1<c+0c-1<c+0; since c+0=cc+0=c by Additive Cancellation and Elementary Additive Identities in a Field we obtain c−1<cc-1<c. Statement 1 of Approximation Property of the Supremum and the Infimum in R\mathbb{R} therefore produces an element of EE strictly above c−1c-1, that is, a natural number nn with c−1<ι(n)c-1<\iota(n).

Adding 11 to both sides, which preserves strict inequality by statement 1 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, and using (c−1)+1=c(c-1)+1=c from Additive Cancellation and Elementary Additive Identities in a Field, we get c<ι(n)+1c<\iota(n)+1. By statement 1 of Properties of the Canonical Map from the Natural Numbers to an Ordered Field we have ι(n)+1=ι(n+1)\iota(n)+1=\iota(n+1), so c<ι(n+1)c<\iota(n+1). But ι(n+1)∈E\iota(n+1)\in E and cc is an upper bound for EE, so ι(n+1)≤c\iota(n+1)\le c; together with c≤ι(n+1)c\le\iota(n+1) antisymmetry gives c=ι(n+1)c=\iota(n+1), contradicting c≠ι(n+1)c\ne\iota(n+1). This contradiction proves claim 1.

2. Archimedean property. Let x,ε∈Rx,\varepsilon\in\mathbb{R} with 0<ε0<\varepsilon. In particular ε≠0\varepsilon\ne 0, so ε−1\varepsilon^{-1} exists and 0<ε−10<\varepsilon^{-1} by statement 7 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. Applying claim 1 to the real number x ε−1x\,\varepsilon^{-1} gives n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N} with x ε−1<ι(n)x\,\varepsilon^{-1}<\iota(n). Multiplying by the positive element ε\varepsilon, which preserves strict inequality by statement 10 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, gives

ε (x ε−1)<ε ι(n).\varepsilon\,(x\,\varepsilon^{-1})<\varepsilon\,\iota(n).

Now ε (x ε−1)=x (ε ε−1)=x⋅1=x\varepsilon\,(x\,\varepsilon^{-1})=x\,(\varepsilon\,\varepsilon^{-1})=x\cdot 1=x and ε ι(n)=ι(n) ε\varepsilon\,\iota(n)=\iota(n)\,\varepsilon, so x<ι(n) εx<\iota(n)\,\varepsilon.

3. Small reciprocals. Let ε∈R\varepsilon\in\mathbb{R} with 0<ε0<\varepsilon, so that ε−1\varepsilon^{-1} exists and 0<ε−10<\varepsilon^{-1} as in claim 2. Applying claim 1 to ε−1\varepsilon^{-1} gives n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N} with ε−1<ι(n)\varepsilon^{-1}<\iota(n). By statement 3 of Properties of the Canonical Map from the Natural Numbers to an Ordered Field the inverse ι(n)−1\iota(n)^{-1} exists and satisfies 0<ι(n)−10<\iota(n)^{-1}.

Put c=ε ι(n)−1c=\varepsilon\,\iota(n)^{-1}. Since 0<ε0<\varepsilon and 0<ι(n)−10<\iota(n)^{-1}, statement 5 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives 0<c0<c. Multiplying the inequality ε−1<ι(n)\varepsilon^{-1}<\iota(n) by cc, which preserves strict inequality by statement 10 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, gives c ε−1<c ι(n)c\,\varepsilon^{-1}<c\,\iota(n). Now

c ε−1=(ε ε−1) ι(n)−1=ι(n)−1,c ι(n)=ε (ι(n)−1ι(n))=ε,c\,\varepsilon^{-1}=(\varepsilon\,\varepsilon^{-1})\,\iota(n)^{-1}=\iota(n)^{-1},\qquad c\,\iota(n)=\varepsilon\,(\iota(n)^{-1}\iota(n))=\varepsilon ,

so ι(n)−1<ε\iota(n)^{-1}<\varepsilon. Together with 0<ι(n)−10<\iota(n)^{-1} this is the assertion.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…