Lebesgue densities and densities relative to the Gaussian differ by the factor , which gives the entropy identity; the scaling map is the gradient of a convex quadratic, hence tangent; Cauchy-Schwarz shows the two Fisher-information conditions are equivalent and uniqueness identifies the relative score; the free-energy clauses follow by unwinding definitions.
Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. Throughout, is the function (with ) of The Function : Continuity, Young's Inequality and Lower Bounds, with the Elementary Bounds for the Exponential and the Logarithm, densities are those of The Radon-Nikodym Theorem for a Finite Measure and a Sigma-Finite Measure, and Uniqueness of Densities, is Lebesgue measure on , is the second moment of The Second Moment of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space and the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment §moment, and is the least variance of The Diagonal Gaussian Density on Euclidean Space and Its Notation §variances. For we put
so that by The Diagonal Gaussian Density on Euclidean Space and Its Notation §density.
Step 0 (The quadratic form ). Let be the real matrix with diagonal entries and all other entries ; it equals its transpose, so (Real Matrices, Symmetric Matrices and the Semidefinite Ordering: Standing Notation §symmetric), and for the th entry of the matrix-vector product is , so that and by The Diagonal Gaussian Density on Euclidean Space and Its Notation §scaling. By Quadratic and Affine Functions of Class , Translation, and Quadratic Perturbation of Semiconvexity §quadratic, with , the matrix , linear coefficient and constant term , the function is of class on with gradient for every . Since is open in itself by claim 1 of Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and Maps are Continuous, claims 2 and 3 of that lemma show that is of class on and continuous on as a map into with the absolute-value metric, hence Borel by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §borel-maps. Consequently and are Borel by claims 1 and 2 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions. Finally, since for every , one has , and summing over ,
Step 1 (Clause 1). The function is Borel and nonnegative by Step 0, and by the displayed inequality and claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral (monotonicity and positive homogeneity of the integral of nonnegative functions),
the second moment being finite because (The Second Moment of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space and the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment §space). Since the function equals its own absolute value, it is integrable with respect to by Integrable Function and the Lebesgue Integral. This is clause 1.
Step 2 (Clause 2). The argument parallels the comparison of the entropy with the standard Gaussian relative entropy, with in place of the standard Gaussian weight.
(a) The reciprocal weight. For every , is positive and by claim 2 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function, and , by the inverse relation of The Natural Logarithm. The function is smooth on by claim 3 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function; identifying with , whose Euclidean distance is the absolute-value metric by The Euclidean Distance on the Real Line is the Absolute Value Metric, and using that is open in itself by claim 1 of Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and Maps are Continuous, claim 3 of that lemma shows that is continuous from to . Hence is measurable with respect to and by claim 3 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space, the Borel -algebra of being by claim 2 there. As is Borel (Step 0 and claim 2 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions), the function is Borel by claim 4 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space. The function is Borel and positive by The Diagonal Gaussian Density on Euclidean Space: Regularity, Gradient, Normalization, Second Moments and Exponential Moments of Diagonal Quadratic Forms §regularity.
(b) Densities with respect to and to . Let be Borel and nonnegative with . Then is a density of with respect to if and only if is a density of with respect to . Indeed, for the function is Borel and nonnegative by claims 1 and 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions, and since is the measure with density with respect to (Diagonal Gaussian Measures on Euclidean Space §measure), claim 3 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables gives
So for every Borel if and only if for every Borel , and these are exactly the two density conditions of The Radon-Nikodym Theorem for a Finite Measure and a Sigma-Finite Measure, and Uniqueness of Densities. (In particular either condition forces whenever , respectively ; no separate absolute-continuity hypothesis is involved, since a density in that theorem is defined by this identity alone.)
(c) A pointwise identity. With as in (b), for every . If , then since , and both sides vanish because . If , then and, by the product rule of The Natural Logarithm and (a), ; multiplying by gives .
(d) The correction term. Let be a density of with respect to . Then is integrable with respect to and
Indeed, the constant function is integrable with respect to with integral by claim 6(a) of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space, being a Borel measure on with (Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §measures); is integrable with respect to by Step 1; so the Borel function is integrable with respect to with the displayed integral by claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral. Since for every Borel , is the measure with density with respect to of claim 3 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables, and that claim shows that is integrable with respect to with the same integral.
(e) Conclusion. Suppose first that has finite entropy, with a density with respect to for which is integrable with respect to (The Entropy of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space §entropy). Put , Borel and nonnegative by (a) and claim 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions, with . By (b), is a density of with respect to , and is Borel by The Function : Continuity, Young's Inequality and Lower Bounds, with the Elementary Bounds for the Exponential and the Logarithm §continuous. By (c), , which by (d) and claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral is integrable with respect to with integral . By claim 3 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables, applied to with density , is integrable with respect to with the same integral. As is a probability measure (Diagonal Gaussian Measures on Euclidean Space §measure), has finite relative entropy with respect to and, by Relative Entropy of Probability Measures §relative-entropy, .
Suppose conversely that has finite relative entropy with respect to , with a density with respect to for which is integrable with respect to . Put , Borel and nonnegative by (a) and claim 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions. By (b), is a density of with respect to . By claim 3 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables, is integrable with respect to with integral ; by (c), (d) and claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, the Borel function (Borel by The Function : Continuity, Young's Inequality and Lower Bounds, with the Elementary Bounds for the Exponential and the Logarithm §continuous) is integrable with respect to with integral . So has finite entropy, and by The Entropy of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space §entropy equals that number.
In either case the displayed identity of clause 2 holds, both and being independent of the chosen densities by The Entropy of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space §entropy and Relative Entropy of Probability Measures §relative-entropy.
Step 3 (Clause 3). By Step 0, is of class on in the sense of Differential Calculus and Convexity on Euclidean Open Sets: Standing Notation §derivatives, with gradient map . The domain is a convex subset of , since for all and , and is convex on in the sense of Convex Real-Valued Function on a Convex Subset of : for real and with , expanding gives ; applying this with , , multiplying by and summing over , the th component of being , yields
for all . Moreover, is Borel by claims 1, 2 and 5 of The Borel Sigma-Algebra of a Euclidean Space as a Product, and Measurability of Projections, Sequentially Continuous Maps, and Open and Closed Sets and claim 2 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions (its th component is times the th coordinate projection), so is Borel by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §functions; since for every , for every , and monotonicity and positive homogeneity of the integral of nonnegative measurable functions (Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative) give
\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\lVert S_{c}\rVert^{2}\,d\mu\le c_{\min}^{-2}\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\lVert x\rVert^{2}\,\mu(dx)=c_{\min}^{-2}M_{2}(\mu)<\infty. $$ Hence [The Gradient of a Convex Continuously Differentiable Function Belongs to the Tangent Space When It Is Square-Integrable §tangent](/theorems/3b2dda99-dd88-440f-bd3c-4dc63af7eba1?v=04eebb1f-ec87-488a-8271-98e21b355396#clause-tangent), applied to $f=h_{c}$, shows that the class of $\nabla h_{c}=S_{c}$ in $L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d})$, which is the class written $S_{c}$, belongs to $T_{\mu}$. This is [clause 3](/theorems/f754b703-fb19-478d-b57f-3908b13ff136?v=5a05a5a6-11d1-4635-a538-b5f06b15d618#clause-tangent). **Step 4 (Clause 4).** By [Square-Integrable Vector Fields Against a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space, and Test Functions: Standing Notation §l2mu](/theorems/525e9aba-ad22-4bbc-b284-967de0a91469?v=83783c6c-8ef9-4ee8-8ed3-9d70d20cd59a#clause-l2mu), $L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d})$ is a real Hilbert space, in particular a real inner product space ([Real Hilbert Space §hilbert](/theorems/df9d54cf-fbdf-4d11-b0b3-129b6d29c98c?v=8ad06291-e649-4b96-928c-0bd7f8f79a79#clause-hilbert)) with inner product $\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle_{\mu}$ and norm $\lVert\cdot\rVert_{\mu}$. Put $K=\lVert S_{c}\rVert_{\mu}$, a nonnegative real number. For $\psi\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}^{d})$, [The Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality in a Real Inner Product Space](/theorems/75e68dc9-c425-4d4e-afd8-53eba404a50e?v=638ad390-44c9-472a-bccb-9ba6242bb219) gives|\langle S_{c},\nabla\psi\rangle_{\mu}|\le K,\lVert\nabla\psi\rVert_{\mu},
and by [Finite Fisher Information Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure: the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Functional, the Relative Score and the Relative Fisher Information §functional](/theorems/d6475c3c-0db3-4295-914c-f755a2adc3c7?v=f877bac6-ee09-4301-83a2-5a6eb574db25#clause-functional), $\ell^{c}_{\mu}(\psi)=\int\Delta\psi\,d\mu-\langle S_{c},\nabla\psi\rangle_{\mu}$. If $\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}^{\mathcal{I}}(\mathbb{R}^{d})$, with a constant $C\ge0$ as in [Finite Fisher Information, the Score and the Fisher Information of a Probability Measure §finite](/theorems/7917fccc-0aab-409d-8894-4bd1dd8226d6?v=133c3f9a-a639-4a89-9abf-8dbcddc04767#clause-finite), then by claims 2 and 5 of [Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field](/theorems/cbeef0cf-b6b0-4ce2-8b8a-d9fb43b5711a?v=2a9a804d-7459-42fd-9385-3c4d7fdc97de), $|\ell^{c}_{\mu}(\psi)|\le|\int\Delta\psi\,d\mu|+|\langle S_{c},\nabla\psi\rangle_{\mu}|\le(C+K)\lVert\nabla\psi\rVert_{\mu}$ for every $\psi$, so $\mu$ has finite Fisher information relative to $\gamma_{c}$ ([Finite Fisher Information Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure: the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Functional, the Relative Score and the Relative Fisher Information §finite](/theorems/d6475c3c-0db3-4295-914c-f755a2adc3c7?v=f877bac6-ee09-4301-83a2-5a6eb574db25#clause-finite)) with constant $C+K\ge0$. Conversely, if $\mu$ has finite Fisher information relative to $\gamma_{c}$, with a constant $C'\ge0$ as in [Finite Fisher Information Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure: the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Functional, the Relative Score and the Relative Fisher Information §finite](/theorems/d6475c3c-0db3-4295-914c-f755a2adc3c7?v=f877bac6-ee09-4301-83a2-5a6eb574db25#clause-finite), then $\int\Delta\psi\,d\mu=\ell^{c}_{\mu}(\psi)+\langle S_{c},\nabla\psi\rangle_{\mu}$, and the same claims give $|\int\Delta\psi\,d\mu|\le(C'+K)\lVert\nabla\psi\rVert_{\mu}$ for every $\psi$; as $\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d})$, this says $\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}^{\mathcal{I}}(\mathbb{R}^{d})$ by [Finite Fisher Information, the Score and the Fisher Information of a Probability Measure §finite](/theorems/7917fccc-0aab-409d-8894-4bd1dd8226d6?v=133c3f9a-a639-4a89-9abf-8dbcddc04767#clause-finite). Now let $\mu$ satisfy these equivalent conditions, and put $\eta=\xi_{\mu}+S_{c}$. Since $\xi_{\mu}\in T_{\mu}$ by [Finite Fisher Information, the Score and the Fisher Information of a Probability Measure §score](/theorems/7917fccc-0aab-409d-8894-4bd1dd8226d6?v=133c3f9a-a639-4a89-9abf-8dbcddc04767#clause-score), $S_{c}\in T_{\mu}$ by Step 3, and $T_{\mu}$ is a linear subspace of $L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d})$ by [Basic Properties of the Tangent Space: Closed Subspace, the Identity Map Belongs to It, Second-Moment Limits, and Representation of Bounded Functionals on Gradients §closed](/theorems/c557b279-9f31-4911-b5f7-31420742f7c8?v=a49b7507-17a5-40b4-8693-2069ff96df71#clause-closed), we have $\eta\in T_{\mu}$. For every $\psi\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}^{d})$, additivity of the inner product in its first argument ([Real Inner Product Space §inner-product](/theorems/9b2285b3-45e0-4efe-8368-ceb779c4bbc7?v=b196350d-5105-4be4-87a2-8e7fdecd75b8#clause-inner-product)) and the defining identity of $\xi_{\mu}$ in [Finite Fisher Information, the Score and the Fisher Information of a Probability Measure §score](/theorems/7917fccc-0aab-409d-8894-4bd1dd8226d6?v=133c3f9a-a639-4a89-9abf-8dbcddc04767#clause-score) give\langle\eta,\nabla\psi\rangle_{\mu}=\langle\xi_{\mu},\nabla\psi\rangle_{\mu}+\langle S_{c},\nabla\psi\rangle_{\mu}=-\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\Delta\psi,d\mu+\langle S_{c},\nabla\psi\rangle_{\mu}=-\ell^{c}_{\mu}(\psi).
By the uniqueness in [Finite Fisher Information Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure: the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Functional, the Relative Score and the Relative Fisher Information §score](/theorems/d6475c3c-0db3-4295-914c-f755a2adc3c7?v=f877bac6-ee09-4301-83a2-5a6eb574db25#clause-score), $\zeta^{c}_{\mu}=\eta=\xi_{\mu}+S_{c}$. This is [clause 4](/theorems/f754b703-fb19-478d-b57f-3908b13ff136?v=5a05a5a6-11d1-4635-a538-b5f06b15d618#clause-score). **Step 5 (Clause 5).** Apply [The Relative Free Energy and the Relative Score of a Probability Measure for a Potential on an Open Set §energy](/theorems/0eea6d8e-847f-42f9-b65e-3a9720ba7014?v=6303adc5-b7f9-48f6-a764-1df48fba42cd#clause-energy) with $D=\mathbb{R}^{d}$, which is open by claim 1 of [Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and $C^k$ Maps are Continuous](/theorems/cbd495a3-9ee9-498d-bd11-b22f41fc1ed0?v=bab38cb2-ed48-4534-8c30-654eda99c219), $U=V_{c}$ and temperature $a$. That $V_{c}$ is of class $C^{2}$ on $\mathbb{R}^{d}$ with $DV_{c}(x)=a\,S_{c}(x)$, as stated before clause 5, also follows from [Quadratic and Affine Functions of Class $C^2$, Translation, and Quadratic Perturbation of Semiconvexity §quadratic](/theorems/53755eb4-dc50-47f1-97dd-8a7a52f18ff3?v=a69f97a3-eaa4-4395-bd9b-599c3bc69330#clause-quadratic) with the symmetric matrix $a\,M_{c}$ of Step 0, whose matrix-vector product with $x$ is $a\,S_{c}(x)$. Since $D=\mathbb{R}^{d}$, the extended maps of that definition are $\bar{V}_{c}=V_{c}$ and $\nabla V_{c}=a\,S_{c}$, and $\mu(D)=\mu(\mathbb{R}^{d})=1$ holds for every $\mu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{d})$. By Step 1 and claim 2 of [Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral](/theorems/56ed866b-2761-445c-a3de-5a72e9a7f46c?v=09e8eada-637a-41e6-81e8-77291e1bdea6), $V_{c}=\tfrac{a}{2}|\cdot|_{c}^{2}$ is integrable with respect to $\mu$, with $\int V_{c}\,d\mu=\tfrac{a}{2}\int|x|_{c}^{2}\,\mu(dx)$. Hence, $\mu$ lying in $\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d})$, $\mu\in\mathcal{D}_{V_{c},a}$ if and only if $\mu$ has finite entropy, that is ([The Entropy of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space §entropy](/theorems/587ba69f-eb94-4439-b9a2-de24ff354c6d?v=8c6ade6c-1ae7-4388-816f-d6ce087c6efb#clause-entropy)) $\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}^{\mathrm{Ent}}(\mathbb{R}^{d})$; by Step 2 this holds if and only if $\mu$ has finite relative entropy with respect to $\gamma_{c}$. In that case Step 2 gives $\mathrm{Ent}(\mu)=H(\mu\,|\,\gamma_{c})-\tfrac12\int|x|_{c}^{2}\,\mu(dx)-Z_{c}$, so\mathcal{E}{V{c},a}(\mu)=a,\mathrm{Ent}(\mu)+\tfrac{a}{2}\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}|x|{c}^{2},\mu(dx)=a,H(\mu,|,\gamma{c})-a,Z_{c}.
This is [clause 5](/theorems/f754b703-fb19-478d-b57f-3908b13ff136?v=5a05a5a6-11d1-4635-a538-b5f06b15d618#clause-free-energy). **Step 6 (Clause 6).** By [The Relative Free Energy and the Relative Score of a Probability Measure for a Potential on an Open Set §score](/theorems/0eea6d8e-847f-42f9-b65e-3a9720ba7014?v=6303adc5-b7f9-48f6-a764-1df48fba42cd#clause-score), $\mu\in\mathcal{D}^{\Sigma}_{V_{c},a}$ if and only if $\mu\in\mathcal{D}_{V_{c},a}$, $\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}^{\mathcal{I}}(\mathbb{R}^{d})$ and $\int\lVert\nabla V_{c}\rVert^{2}\,d\mu<\infty$. The last condition always holds: $\lVert a\,S_{c}(x)\rVert^{2}=a^{2}\lVert S_{c}(x)\rVert^{2}$, so by positive homogeneity of the integral ([Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative](/theorems/56ed866b-2761-445c-a3de-5a72e9a7f46c?v=09e8eada-637a-41e6-81e8-77291e1bdea6#clause-nonnegative)) and the bound $\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\lVert S_{c}\rVert^{2}\,d\mu\le c_{\min}^{-2}M_{2}(\mu)$ derived in Step 3, $\int\lVert\nabla V_{c}\rVert^{2}\,d\mu=a^{2}\int\lVert S_{c}\rVert^{2}\,d\mu\le a^{2}c_{\min}^{-2}M_{2}(\mu)<\infty$. Hence, by Step 5 and Step 4, $\mu\in\mathcal{D}^{\Sigma}_{V_{c},a}$ if and only if $\mu$ has finite relative entropy with respect to $\gamma_{c}$ and finite Fisher information relative to $\gamma_{c}$. In that case the class of $\nabla V_{c}$ in $L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d})$ is $a\,S_{c}$, as stated before clause 5, and Step 4 gives $\zeta^{c}_{\mu}=\xi_{\mu}+S_{c}$, so, computing in the real vector space $L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d})$,\Sigma_{V_{c},a}(\mu)=a,S_{c}+a,\xi_{\mu}=a,(\xi_{\mu}+S_{c})=a,\zeta^{c}_{\mu}.
This is [clause 6](/theorems/f754b703-fb19-478d-b57f-3908b13ff136?v=5a05a5a6-11d1-4635-a538-b5f06b15d618#clause-relative-score).Loading…