TheoremBase

Lebesgue densities and densities relative to the Gaussian differ by the factor rhocrho_c, which gives the entropy identity; the scaling map is the gradient of a convex quadratic, hence tangent; Cauchy-Schwarz shows the two Fisher-information conditions are equivalent and uniqueness identifies the relative score; the free-energy clauses follow by unwinding definitions.

Proof

Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. Throughout, ϕ\phi is the function s↦slog⁡ss\mapsto s\log s (with ϕ(0)=0\phi(0)=0) of The Function slog⁡ss\log s: Continuity, Young's Inequality and Lower Bounds, with the Elementary Bounds for the Exponential and the Logarithm, densities are those of The Radon-Nikodym Theorem for a Finite Measure and a Sigma-Finite Measure, and Uniqueness of Densities, λd\lambda_{d} is Lebesgue measure on B(Rd)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d}), M2M_{2} is the second moment of The Second Moment of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space and the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment §moment, and cmin⁡c_{\min} is the least variance of The Diagonal Gaussian Density on Euclidean Space and Its Notation §variances. For x∈Rdx\in\mathbb{R}^{d} we put

hc(x)=12∣x∣c2,Φc(x)=−12∣x∣c2−Zc,h_{c}(x)=\tfrac12|x|_{c}^{2},\qquad \Phi_{c}(x)=-\tfrac12|x|_{c}^{2}-Z_{c},

so that ρc(x)=exp⁡(Φc(x))\rho_{c}(x)=\exp(\Phi_{c}(x)) by The Diagonal Gaussian Density on Euclidean Space and Its Notation §density.

Step 0 (The quadratic form hch_{c}). Let McM_{c} be the real d×dd\times d matrix with diagonal entries 1/c1,…,1/cd1/c_{1},\dots,1/c_{d} and all other entries 00; it equals its transpose, so Mc∈S(d)M_{c}\in\mathcal{S}(d) (Real Matrices, Symmetric Matrices and the Semidefinite Ordering: Standing Notation §symmetric), and for x∈Rdx\in\mathbb{R}^{d} the iith entry of the matrix-vector product McxM_{c}x is xi/cix_{i}/c_{i}, so that Mcx=Sc(x)M_{c}x=S_{c}(x) and x⋅(Mcx)=∣x∣c2x\cdot(M_{c}x)=|x|_{c}^{2} by The Diagonal Gaussian Density on Euclidean Space and Its Notation §scaling. By Quadratic and Affine Functions of Class C2C^2, Translation, and Quadratic Perturbation of Semiconvexity §quadratic, with n=dn=d, the matrix McM_{c}, linear coefficient 0Rd0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}} and constant term 00, the function hch_{c} is of class C2C^{2} on Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} with gradient Dhc(x)=Sc(x)Dh_{c}(x)=S_{c}(x) for every x∈Rdx\in\mathbb{R}^{d}. Since Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} is open in itself by claim 1 of Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and CkC^k Maps are Continuous, claims 2 and 3 of that lemma show that hch_{c} is of class C1C^{1} on Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} and continuous on Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} as a map into R\mathbb{R} with the absolute-value metric, hence Borel by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §borel-maps. Consequently x↦∣x∣c2=2hc(x)x\mapsto|x|_{c}^{2}=2h_{c}(x) and Φc=−hc−Zc\Phi_{c}=-h_{c}-Z_{c} are Borel by claims 1 and 2 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions. Finally, since 0<cmin⁡≤ci0<c_{\min}\le c_{i} for every i∈[d]i\in[d], one has 0≤xi2/ci≤cmin⁡−1xi20\le x_{i}^{2}/c_{i}\le c_{\min}^{-1}x_{i}^{2}, and summing over ii,

0≤∣x∣c2≤cmin⁡−1∥x∥2for every x∈Rd.0\le|x|_{c}^{2}\le c_{\min}^{-1}\lVert x\rVert^{2}\qquad\text{for every }x\in\mathbb{R}^{d}.

Step 1 (Clause 1). The function x↦∣x∣c2x\mapsto|x|_{c}^{2} is Borel and nonnegative by Step 0, and by the displayed inequality and claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral (monotonicity and positive homogeneity of the integral of nonnegative functions),

∫Rd∣x∣c2 μ(dx)≤cmin⁡−1∫Rd∥x∥2 μ(dx)=cmin⁡−1M2(μ)<∞,\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}|x|_{c}^{2}\,\mu(dx)\le c_{\min}^{-1}\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\lVert x\rVert^{2}\,\mu(dx)=c_{\min}^{-1}M_{2}(\mu)<\infty,

the second moment being finite because μ∈P2(Rd)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) (The Second Moment of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space and the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment §space). Since the function equals its own absolute value, it is integrable with respect to μ\mu by Integrable Function and the Lebesgue Integral. This is clause 1.

Step 2 (Clause 2). The argument parallels the comparison of the entropy with the standard Gaussian relative entropy, with ρc\rho_{c} in place of the standard Gaussian weight.

(a) The reciprocal weight. For every xx, ρc(x)=exp⁡(Φc(x))\rho_{c}(x)=\exp(\Phi_{c}(x)) is positive and 1/ρc(x)=exp⁡(−Φc(x))1/\rho_{c}(x)=\exp(-\Phi_{c}(x)) by claim 2 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function, and log⁡ρc(x)=Φc(x)\log\rho_{c}(x)=\Phi_{c}(x), log⁡(1/ρc(x))=−Φc(x)\log(1/\rho_{c}(x))=-\Phi_{c}(x) by the inverse relation of The Natural Logarithm. The function exp⁡\exp is smooth on R\mathbb{R} by claim 3 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function; identifying R\mathbb{R} with R1\mathbb{R}^{1}, whose Euclidean distance is the absolute-value metric dRd_{\mathbb{R}} by The Euclidean Distance on the Real Line is the Absolute Value Metric, and using that R1\mathbb{R}^{1} is open in itself by claim 1 of Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and CkC^k Maps are Continuous, claim 3 of that lemma shows that exp⁡\exp is continuous from (R,dR)(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}) to (R,dR)(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}). Hence exp⁡\exp is measurable with respect to B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) and B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) by claim 3 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space, the Borel σ\sigma-algebra of (R,dR)(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}) being B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) by claim 2 there. As −Φc-\Phi_{c} is Borel (Step 0 and claim 2 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions), the function 1/ρc=exp⁡∘(−Φc)1/\rho_{c}=\exp\circ(-\Phi_{c}) is Borel by claim 4 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space. The function ρc\rho_{c} is Borel and positive by The Diagonal Gaussian Density on Euclidean Space: Regularity, Gradient, Normalization, Second Moments and Exponential Moments of Diagonal Quadratic Forms §regularity.

(b) Densities with respect to λd\lambda_{d} and to γc\gamma_{c}. Let ρ,f:Rd→R\rho,f:\mathbb{R}^{d}\to\mathbb{R} be Borel and nonnegative with ρ=fρc\rho=f\rho_{c}. Then ρ\rho is a density of μ\mu with respect to λd\lambda_{d} if and only if ff is a density of μ\mu with respect to γc\gamma_{c}. Indeed, for B∈B(Rd)B\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) the function 1Bf\mathbf{1}_{B}f is Borel and nonnegative by claims 1 and 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions, and since γc\gamma_{c} is the measure with density ρc\rho_{c} with respect to λd\lambda_{d} (Diagonal Gaussian Measures on Euclidean Space §measure), claim 3 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables gives

∫Rd1Bf dγc=∫Rd1Bfρc dλd=∫Rd1Bρ dλd.\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\mathbf{1}_{B}f\,d\gamma_{c}=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\mathbf{1}_{B}f\rho_{c}\,d\lambda_{d}=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\mathbf{1}_{B}\rho\,d\lambda_{d}.

So μ(B)=∫1Bρ dλd\mu(B)=\int\mathbf{1}_{B}\rho\,d\lambda_{d} for every Borel BB if and only if μ(B)=∫1Bf dγc\mu(B)=\int\mathbf{1}_{B}f\,d\gamma_{c} for every Borel BB, and these are exactly the two density conditions of The Radon-Nikodym Theorem for a Finite Measure and a Sigma-Finite Measure, and Uniqueness of Densities. (In particular either condition forces μ(B)=0\mu(B)=0 whenever λd(B)=0\lambda_{d}(B)=0, respectively γc(B)=0\gamma_{c}(B)=0; no separate absolute-continuity hypothesis is involved, since a density in that theorem is defined by this identity alone.)

(c) A pointwise identity. With ρ,f\rho,f as in (b), ρc(x) ϕ(f(x))=ϕ(ρ(x))−ρ(x) Φc(x)\rho_{c}(x)\,\phi(f(x))=\phi(\rho(x))-\rho(x)\,\Phi_{c}(x) for every x∈Rdx\in\mathbb{R}^{d}. If ρ(x)=0\rho(x)=0, then f(x)=0f(x)=0 since ρc(x)>0\rho_{c}(x)>0, and both sides vanish because ϕ(0)=0\phi(0)=0. If ρ(x)>0\rho(x)>0, then f(x)=ρ(x)⋅(1/ρc(x))>0f(x)=\rho(x)\cdot(1/\rho_{c}(x))>0 and, by the product rule log⁡(st)=log⁡s+log⁡t\log(st)=\log s+\log t of The Natural Logarithm and (a), log⁡f(x)=log⁡ρ(x)−Φc(x)\log f(x)=\log\rho(x)-\Phi_{c}(x); multiplying by ρc(x)f(x)=ρ(x)\rho_{c}(x)f(x)=\rho(x) gives ρc(x)ϕ(f(x))=ρ(x)log⁡ρ(x)−ρ(x)Φc(x)=ϕ(ρ(x))−ρ(x)Φc(x)\rho_{c}(x)\phi(f(x))=\rho(x)\log\rho(x)-\rho(x)\Phi_{c}(x)=\phi(\rho(x))-\rho(x)\Phi_{c}(x).

(d) The correction term. Let ρ\rho be a density of μ\mu with respect to λd\lambda_{d}. Then ρ Φc\rho\,\Phi_{c} is integrable with respect to λd\lambda_{d} and

∫Rdρ Φc dλd=−12∫Rd∣x∣c2 μ(dx)−Zc.\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\rho\,\Phi_{c}\,d\lambda_{d}=-\tfrac12\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}|x|_{c}^{2}\,\mu(dx)-Z_{c}.

Indeed, the constant function ZcZ_{c} is integrable with respect to μ\mu with integral Zc μ(Rd)=ZcZ_{c}\,\mu(\mathbb{R}^{d})=Z_{c} by claim 6(a) of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space, μ\mu being a Borel measure on (Rd,dE)(\mathbb{R}^{d},d_{E}) with μ(Rd)=1\mu(\mathbb{R}^{d})=1 (Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §measures); x↦∣x∣c2x\mapsto|x|_{c}^{2} is integrable with respect to μ\mu by Step 1; so the Borel function Φc\Phi_{c} is integrable with respect to μ\mu with the displayed integral by claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral. Since μ(A)=∫1Aρ dλd\mu(A)=\int\mathbf{1}_{A}\rho\,d\lambda_{d} for every Borel AA, μ\mu is the measure with density ρ\rho with respect to λd\lambda_{d} of claim 3 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables, and that claim shows that Φcρ\Phi_{c}\rho is integrable with respect to λd\lambda_{d} with the same integral.

(e) Conclusion. Suppose first that μ\mu has finite entropy, with a density ρ\rho with respect to λd\lambda_{d} for which ϕ∘ρ\phi\circ\rho is integrable with respect to λd\lambda_{d} (The Entropy of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space §entropy). Put f=ρ⋅(1/ρc)f=\rho\cdot(1/\rho_{c}), Borel and nonnegative by (a) and claim 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions, with ρ=fρc\rho=f\rho_{c}. By (b), ff is a density of μ\mu with respect to γc\gamma_{c}, and ϕ∘f\phi\circ f is Borel by The Function slog⁡ss\log s: Continuity, Young's Inequality and Lower Bounds, with the Elementary Bounds for the Exponential and the Logarithm §continuous. By (c), (ϕ∘f)ρc=ϕ∘ρ−ρ Φc(\phi\circ f)\rho_{c}=\phi\circ\rho-\rho\,\Phi_{c}, which by (d) and claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral is integrable with respect to λd\lambda_{d} with integral Ent(μ)+12∫∣x∣c2 μ(dx)+Zc\mathrm{Ent}(\mu)+\tfrac12\int|x|_{c}^{2}\,\mu(dx)+Z_{c}. By claim 3 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables, applied to γc\gamma_{c} with density ρc\rho_{c}, ϕ∘f\phi\circ f is integrable with respect to γc\gamma_{c} with the same integral. As γc\gamma_{c} is a probability measure (Diagonal Gaussian Measures on Euclidean Space §measure), μ\mu has finite relative entropy with respect to γc\gamma_{c} and, by Relative Entropy of Probability Measures §relative-entropy, H(μ ∣ γc)=Ent(μ)+12∫∣x∣c2 μ(dx)+ZcH(\mu\,|\,\gamma_{c})=\mathrm{Ent}(\mu)+\tfrac12\int|x|_{c}^{2}\,\mu(dx)+Z_{c}.

Suppose conversely that μ\mu has finite relative entropy with respect to γc\gamma_{c}, with a density ff with respect to γc\gamma_{c} for which ϕ∘f\phi\circ f is integrable with respect to γc\gamma_{c}. Put ρ=fρc\rho=f\rho_{c}, Borel and nonnegative by (a) and claim 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions. By (b), ρ\rho is a density of μ\mu with respect to λd\lambda_{d}. By claim 3 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables, (ϕ∘f)ρc(\phi\circ f)\rho_{c} is integrable with respect to λd\lambda_{d} with integral H(μ ∣ γc)H(\mu\,|\,\gamma_{c}); by (c), (d) and claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, the Borel function ϕ∘ρ=(ϕ∘f)ρc+ρ Φc\phi\circ\rho=(\phi\circ f)\rho_{c}+\rho\,\Phi_{c} (Borel by The Function slog⁡ss\log s: Continuity, Young's Inequality and Lower Bounds, with the Elementary Bounds for the Exponential and the Logarithm §continuous) is integrable with respect to λd\lambda_{d} with integral H(μ ∣ γc)−12∫∣x∣c2 μ(dx)−ZcH(\mu\,|\,\gamma_{c})-\tfrac12\int|x|_{c}^{2}\,\mu(dx)-Z_{c}. So μ\mu has finite entropy, and by The Entropy of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space §entropy Ent(μ)\mathrm{Ent}(\mu) equals that number.

In either case the displayed identity of clause 2 holds, both Ent(μ)\mathrm{Ent}(\mu) and H(μ ∣ γc)H(\mu\,|\,\gamma_{c}) being independent of the chosen densities by The Entropy of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space §entropy and Relative Entropy of Probability Measures §relative-entropy.

Step 3 (Clause 3). By Step 0, hc:Rd→Rh_{c}:\mathbb{R}^{d}\to\mathbb{R} is of class C1C^{1} on Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} in the sense of Differential Calculus and Convexity on Euclidean Open Sets: Standing Notation §derivatives, with gradient map ∇hc=Sc\nabla h_{c}=S_{c}. The domain Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} is a convex subset of Rd\mathbb{R}^{d}, since t x+(1−t) y∈Rdt\,x+(1-t)\,y\in\mathbb{R}^{d} for all x,y∈Rdx,y\in\mathbb{R}^{d} and 0≤t≤10\le t\le1, and hch_{c} is convex on Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} in the sense of Convex Real-Valued Function on a Convex Subset of Rn\mathbb{R}^n: for real a,ba,b and tt with 0≤t≤10\le t\le1, expanding gives t a2+(1−t) b2−(t a+(1−t) b)2=t(1−t)(a−b)2≥0t\,a^{2}+(1-t)\,b^{2}-(t\,a+(1-t)\,b)^{2}=t(1-t)(a-b)^{2}\ge0; applying this with a=xia=x_{i}, b=yib=y_{i}, multiplying by 1/(2ci)>01/(2c_{i})>0 and summing over i∈[d]i\in[d], the iith component of t x+(1−t) yt\,x+(1-t)\,y being t xi+(1−t) yit\,x_{i}+(1-t)\,y_{i}, yields

t hc(x)+(1−t) hc(y)−hc(t x+(1−t) y)=12 t(1−t) ∣x−y∣c2≥0t\,h_{c}(x)+(1-t)\,h_{c}(y)-h_{c}\bigl(t\,x+(1-t)\,y\bigr)=\tfrac12\,t(1-t)\,|x-y|_{c}^{2}\ge0

for all x,y∈Rdx,y\in\mathbb{R}^{d}. Moreover, ScS_{c} is Borel by claims 1, 2 and 5 of The Borel Sigma-Algebra of a Euclidean Space as a Product, and Measurability of Projections, Sequentially Continuous Maps, and Open and Closed Sets and claim 2 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions (its iith component is ci−1c_{i}^{-1} times the iith coordinate projection), so x↦∥Sc(x)∥2x\mapsto\lVert S_{c}(x)\rVert^{2} is Borel by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §functions; since 0<cmin⁡≤ci0<c_{\min}\le c_{i} for every i∈[d]i\in[d], ∥Sc(x)∥2=∑i=1dxi2/ci2≤cmin⁡−2∥x∥2\lVert S_{c}(x)\rVert^{2}=\sum_{i=1}^{d}x_{i}^{2}/c_{i}^{2}\le c_{\min}^{-2}\lVert x\rVert^{2} for every x∈Rdx\in\mathbb{R}^{d}, and monotonicity and positive homogeneity of the integral of nonnegative measurable functions (Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative) give

\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\lVert S_{c}\rVert^{2}\,d\mu\le c_{\min}^{-2}\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\lVert x\rVert^{2}\,\mu(dx)=c_{\min}^{-2}M_{2}(\mu)<\infty. $$ Hence [The Gradient of a Convex Continuously Differentiable Function Belongs to the Tangent Space When It Is Square-Integrable §tangent](/theorems/3b2dda99-dd88-440f-bd3c-4dc63af7eba1?v=04eebb1f-ec87-488a-8271-98e21b355396#clause-tangent), applied to $f=h_{c}$, shows that the class of $\nabla h_{c}=S_{c}$ in $L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d})$, which is the class written $S_{c}$, belongs to $T_{\mu}$. This is [clause 3](/theorems/f754b703-fb19-478d-b57f-3908b13ff136?v=5a05a5a6-11d1-4635-a538-b5f06b15d618#clause-tangent). **Step 4 (Clause 4).** By [Square-Integrable Vector Fields Against a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space, and Test Functions: Standing Notation §l2mu](/theorems/525e9aba-ad22-4bbc-b284-967de0a91469?v=83783c6c-8ef9-4ee8-8ed3-9d70d20cd59a#clause-l2mu), $L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d})$ is a real Hilbert space, in particular a real inner product space ([Real Hilbert Space §hilbert](/theorems/df9d54cf-fbdf-4d11-b0b3-129b6d29c98c?v=8ad06291-e649-4b96-928c-0bd7f8f79a79#clause-hilbert)) with inner product $\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle_{\mu}$ and norm $\lVert\cdot\rVert_{\mu}$. Put $K=\lVert S_{c}\rVert_{\mu}$, a nonnegative real number. For $\psi\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}^{d})$, [The Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality in a Real Inner Product Space](/theorems/75e68dc9-c425-4d4e-afd8-53eba404a50e?v=638ad390-44c9-472a-bccb-9ba6242bb219) gives

|\langle S_{c},\nabla\psi\rangle_{\mu}|\le K,\lVert\nabla\psi\rVert_{\mu},

and by [Finite Fisher Information Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure: the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Functional, the Relative Score and the Relative Fisher Information §functional](/theorems/d6475c3c-0db3-4295-914c-f755a2adc3c7?v=f877bac6-ee09-4301-83a2-5a6eb574db25#clause-functional), $\ell^{c}_{\mu}(\psi)=\int\Delta\psi\,d\mu-\langle S_{c},\nabla\psi\rangle_{\mu}$. If $\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}^{\mathcal{I}}(\mathbb{R}^{d})$, with a constant $C\ge0$ as in [Finite Fisher Information, the Score and the Fisher Information of a Probability Measure §finite](/theorems/7917fccc-0aab-409d-8894-4bd1dd8226d6?v=133c3f9a-a639-4a89-9abf-8dbcddc04767#clause-finite), then by claims 2 and 5 of [Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field](/theorems/cbeef0cf-b6b0-4ce2-8b8a-d9fb43b5711a?v=2a9a804d-7459-42fd-9385-3c4d7fdc97de), $|\ell^{c}_{\mu}(\psi)|\le|\int\Delta\psi\,d\mu|+|\langle S_{c},\nabla\psi\rangle_{\mu}|\le(C+K)\lVert\nabla\psi\rVert_{\mu}$ for every $\psi$, so $\mu$ has finite Fisher information relative to $\gamma_{c}$ ([Finite Fisher Information Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure: the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Functional, the Relative Score and the Relative Fisher Information §finite](/theorems/d6475c3c-0db3-4295-914c-f755a2adc3c7?v=f877bac6-ee09-4301-83a2-5a6eb574db25#clause-finite)) with constant $C+K\ge0$. Conversely, if $\mu$ has finite Fisher information relative to $\gamma_{c}$, with a constant $C'\ge0$ as in [Finite Fisher Information Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure: the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Functional, the Relative Score and the Relative Fisher Information §finite](/theorems/d6475c3c-0db3-4295-914c-f755a2adc3c7?v=f877bac6-ee09-4301-83a2-5a6eb574db25#clause-finite), then $\int\Delta\psi\,d\mu=\ell^{c}_{\mu}(\psi)+\langle S_{c},\nabla\psi\rangle_{\mu}$, and the same claims give $|\int\Delta\psi\,d\mu|\le(C'+K)\lVert\nabla\psi\rVert_{\mu}$ for every $\psi$; as $\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d})$, this says $\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}^{\mathcal{I}}(\mathbb{R}^{d})$ by [Finite Fisher Information, the Score and the Fisher Information of a Probability Measure §finite](/theorems/7917fccc-0aab-409d-8894-4bd1dd8226d6?v=133c3f9a-a639-4a89-9abf-8dbcddc04767#clause-finite). Now let $\mu$ satisfy these equivalent conditions, and put $\eta=\xi_{\mu}+S_{c}$. Since $\xi_{\mu}\in T_{\mu}$ by [Finite Fisher Information, the Score and the Fisher Information of a Probability Measure §score](/theorems/7917fccc-0aab-409d-8894-4bd1dd8226d6?v=133c3f9a-a639-4a89-9abf-8dbcddc04767#clause-score), $S_{c}\in T_{\mu}$ by Step 3, and $T_{\mu}$ is a linear subspace of $L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d})$ by [Basic Properties of the Tangent Space: Closed Subspace, the Identity Map Belongs to It, Second-Moment Limits, and Representation of Bounded Functionals on Gradients §closed](/theorems/c557b279-9f31-4911-b5f7-31420742f7c8?v=a49b7507-17a5-40b4-8693-2069ff96df71#clause-closed), we have $\eta\in T_{\mu}$. For every $\psi\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}^{d})$, additivity of the inner product in its first argument ([Real Inner Product Space §inner-product](/theorems/9b2285b3-45e0-4efe-8368-ceb779c4bbc7?v=b196350d-5105-4be4-87a2-8e7fdecd75b8#clause-inner-product)) and the defining identity of $\xi_{\mu}$ in [Finite Fisher Information, the Score and the Fisher Information of a Probability Measure §score](/theorems/7917fccc-0aab-409d-8894-4bd1dd8226d6?v=133c3f9a-a639-4a89-9abf-8dbcddc04767#clause-score) give

\langle\eta,\nabla\psi\rangle_{\mu}=\langle\xi_{\mu},\nabla\psi\rangle_{\mu}+\langle S_{c},\nabla\psi\rangle_{\mu}=-\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\Delta\psi,d\mu+\langle S_{c},\nabla\psi\rangle_{\mu}=-\ell^{c}_{\mu}(\psi).

By the uniqueness in [Finite Fisher Information Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure: the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Functional, the Relative Score and the Relative Fisher Information §score](/theorems/d6475c3c-0db3-4295-914c-f755a2adc3c7?v=f877bac6-ee09-4301-83a2-5a6eb574db25#clause-score), $\zeta^{c}_{\mu}=\eta=\xi_{\mu}+S_{c}$. This is [clause 4](/theorems/f754b703-fb19-478d-b57f-3908b13ff136?v=5a05a5a6-11d1-4635-a538-b5f06b15d618#clause-score). **Step 5 (Clause 5).** Apply [The Relative Free Energy and the Relative Score of a Probability Measure for a Potential on an Open Set §energy](/theorems/0eea6d8e-847f-42f9-b65e-3a9720ba7014?v=6303adc5-b7f9-48f6-a764-1df48fba42cd#clause-energy) with $D=\mathbb{R}^{d}$, which is open by claim 1 of [Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and $C^k$ Maps are Continuous](/theorems/cbd495a3-9ee9-498d-bd11-b22f41fc1ed0?v=bab38cb2-ed48-4534-8c30-654eda99c219), $U=V_{c}$ and temperature $a$. That $V_{c}$ is of class $C^{2}$ on $\mathbb{R}^{d}$ with $DV_{c}(x)=a\,S_{c}(x)$, as stated before clause 5, also follows from [Quadratic and Affine Functions of Class $C^2$, Translation, and Quadratic Perturbation of Semiconvexity §quadratic](/theorems/53755eb4-dc50-47f1-97dd-8a7a52f18ff3?v=a69f97a3-eaa4-4395-bd9b-599c3bc69330#clause-quadratic) with the symmetric matrix $a\,M_{c}$ of Step 0, whose matrix-vector product with $x$ is $a\,S_{c}(x)$. Since $D=\mathbb{R}^{d}$, the extended maps of that definition are $\bar{V}_{c}=V_{c}$ and $\nabla V_{c}=a\,S_{c}$, and $\mu(D)=\mu(\mathbb{R}^{d})=1$ holds for every $\mu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{d})$. By Step 1 and claim 2 of [Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral](/theorems/56ed866b-2761-445c-a3de-5a72e9a7f46c?v=09e8eada-637a-41e6-81e8-77291e1bdea6), $V_{c}=\tfrac{a}{2}|\cdot|_{c}^{2}$ is integrable with respect to $\mu$, with $\int V_{c}\,d\mu=\tfrac{a}{2}\int|x|_{c}^{2}\,\mu(dx)$. Hence, $\mu$ lying in $\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d})$, $\mu\in\mathcal{D}_{V_{c},a}$ if and only if $\mu$ has finite entropy, that is ([The Entropy of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space §entropy](/theorems/587ba69f-eb94-4439-b9a2-de24ff354c6d?v=8c6ade6c-1ae7-4388-816f-d6ce087c6efb#clause-entropy)) $\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}^{\mathrm{Ent}}(\mathbb{R}^{d})$; by Step 2 this holds if and only if $\mu$ has finite relative entropy with respect to $\gamma_{c}$. In that case Step 2 gives $\mathrm{Ent}(\mu)=H(\mu\,|\,\gamma_{c})-\tfrac12\int|x|_{c}^{2}\,\mu(dx)-Z_{c}$, so

\mathcal{E}{V{c},a}(\mu)=a,\mathrm{Ent}(\mu)+\tfrac{a}{2}\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}|x|{c}^{2},\mu(dx)=a,H(\mu,|,\gamma{c})-a,Z_{c}.

This is [clause 5](/theorems/f754b703-fb19-478d-b57f-3908b13ff136?v=5a05a5a6-11d1-4635-a538-b5f06b15d618#clause-free-energy). **Step 6 (Clause 6).** By [The Relative Free Energy and the Relative Score of a Probability Measure for a Potential on an Open Set §score](/theorems/0eea6d8e-847f-42f9-b65e-3a9720ba7014?v=6303adc5-b7f9-48f6-a764-1df48fba42cd#clause-score), $\mu\in\mathcal{D}^{\Sigma}_{V_{c},a}$ if and only if $\mu\in\mathcal{D}_{V_{c},a}$, $\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}^{\mathcal{I}}(\mathbb{R}^{d})$ and $\int\lVert\nabla V_{c}\rVert^{2}\,d\mu<\infty$. The last condition always holds: $\lVert a\,S_{c}(x)\rVert^{2}=a^{2}\lVert S_{c}(x)\rVert^{2}$, so by positive homogeneity of the integral ([Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative](/theorems/56ed866b-2761-445c-a3de-5a72e9a7f46c?v=09e8eada-637a-41e6-81e8-77291e1bdea6#clause-nonnegative)) and the bound $\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\lVert S_{c}\rVert^{2}\,d\mu\le c_{\min}^{-2}M_{2}(\mu)$ derived in Step 3, $\int\lVert\nabla V_{c}\rVert^{2}\,d\mu=a^{2}\int\lVert S_{c}\rVert^{2}\,d\mu\le a^{2}c_{\min}^{-2}M_{2}(\mu)<\infty$. Hence, by Step 5 and Step 4, $\mu\in\mathcal{D}^{\Sigma}_{V_{c},a}$ if and only if $\mu$ has finite relative entropy with respect to $\gamma_{c}$ and finite Fisher information relative to $\gamma_{c}$. In that case the class of $\nabla V_{c}$ in $L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d})$ is $a\,S_{c}$, as stated before clause 5, and Step 4 gives $\zeta^{c}_{\mu}=\xi_{\mu}+S_{c}$, so, computing in the real vector space $L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d})$,

\Sigma_{V_{c},a}(\mu)=a,S_{c}+a,\xi_{\mu}=a,(\xi_{\mu}+S_{c})=a,\zeta^{c}_{\mu}.

This is [clause 6](/theorems/f754b703-fb19-478d-b57f-3908b13ff136?v=5a05a5a6-11d1-4635-a538-b5f06b15d618#clause-relative-score).

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…