TheoremBase

Proof of The Gradient of the Quartic Energy on the First Sobolev Space of the Torus

lemmalem:phi4-energy-frechet-derivative-torus-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 13,033 chars · 26 deps · depth 33 Reason: First publication: proof that the quartic energy is differentiable on the first Sobolev space of the torus, by collecting the first-order terms of its expansion into a single inner product against the claimed gradient and bounding the remainder by a constant multiple of the squared Sobolev norm of the increment; with the identification of the gradient on the domain of the form operator.

The first-order terms of the expansion of the energy at a point are collected into a single inner product against the claimed gradient, and the remaining quartic and quadratic terms are bounded by a constant multiple of the squared Sobolev norm of the increment, which gives differentiability.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement and is applied here to the data at hand; the notation is that of the statement, and the measure space throughout is (Q,BQ,λQ)(Q,\mathcal{B}_{Q},\lambda_{Q}) of The Flat Torus: Standing Notation §measure.

Step 0 (Membership in L1(Tn)\mathcal{L}^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) and integrability). Let h:QRh:Q\to\mathbb{R} be measurable. By Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §agreement the power of a nonnegative real number with exponent 11 is that number itself, so the map h1|h|^{1} of Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm §measurable-power is h|h|; hence by Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm §space and the last sentence of Integrable Function and the Lebesgue Integral, hL1(Tn)h\in\mathcal{L}^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) if and only if hh is integrable.

Step 1 (Squares). Let ZL2(Tn)Z\in L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) and let zz be a representative of ZZ. Then the pointwise square z2z^{2} lies in L1(Tn)\mathcal{L}^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) and

Tnz2dx=Z,ZL2=(ZL2)2.\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}z^{2}\,dx=\langle Z,Z\rangle_{L^{2}}=\bigl(\lVert Z\rVert_{L^{2}}\bigr)^{2}.

Indeed z2=zzz^{2}=zz valuewise by claim 1 of Properties of Natural Number Powers in a Field; The Lebesgue Space of Square-Integrable Functions is a Real Hilbert Space §inner-product, applied to zz and zz, gives that zzzz is integrable — hence in L1(Tn)\mathcal{L}^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) by Step 0 — with Tnzzdx=[z],[z]L2=Z,ZL2\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}zz\,dx=\langle[z],[z]\rangle_{L^{2}}=\langle Z,Z\rangle_{L^{2}}; and the norm of Real Inner Product Space §norm is the nonnegative square root of Z,ZL2\langle Z,Z\rangle_{L^{2}}, whose square is Z,ZL2\langle Z,Z\rangle_{L^{2}}.

Claim 1. Let UU, uu and g1,,gng_{1},\dots,g_{n} be as in the claim. By The Sobolev Space of Once Weakly Differentiable Square-Integrable Classes on the Torus §space, UL2(Tn)U\in L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) and jUL2(Tn)\partial_{j}U\in L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) for every j[n]j\in[n], so Step 1 gives u2,g12,,gn2L1(Tn)u^{2},g_{1}^{2},\dots,g_{n}^{2}\in\mathcal{L}^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) with

Tnu2dx=(UL2)2,Tngj2dx=(jUL2)2(j[n]);\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}u^{2}\,dx=\bigl(\lVert U\rVert_{L^{2}}\bigr)^{2},\qquad\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}g_{j}^{2}\,dx=\bigl(\lVert\partial_{j}U\rVert_{L^{2}}\bigr)^{2}\quad(j\in[n]);

and u4L1(Tn)u^{4}\in\mathcal{L}^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) by Integrability of Products of Four Sobolev Classes on the Torus in Dimensions at Most Three §quartic. All these maps are integrable by Step 0. Apply Linearity of the Lebesgue Integral over a Finite Sum of Integrable Functions with the n+2n+2 integrable maps g12,,gn2,u4,u2g_{1}^{2},\dots,g_{n}^{2},u^{4},u^{2} and the coefficients 1,,1,a,c1,\dots,1,a,-c: by the recursion in claim 1 of Properties of Finite Sums and the multiplicative identity axiom, the resulting map is the pointwise combination j=1ngj2+au4cu2\sum_{j=1}^{n}g_{j}^{2}+a\,u^{4}-c\,u^{2} and the resulting sum of integrals regroups in the same way, so that map is integrable, hence lies in L1(Tn)\mathcal{L}^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) by Step 0, and

Tn(j=1ngj2+au4cu2)dx=j=1nTngj2dx+aTnu4dxcTnu2dx.\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}\Bigl(\sum_{j=1}^{n}g_{j}^{2}+a\,u^{4}-c\,u^{2}\Bigr)dx=\sum_{j=1}^{n}\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}g_{j}^{2}\,dx+a\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}u^{4}\,dx-c\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}u^{2}\,dx .

Substituting the three identities displayed above, the right-hand side is j=1n(jUL2)2+aTnu4dxc(UL2)2\sum_{j=1}^{n}(\lVert\partial_{j}U\rVert_{L^{2}})^{2}+a\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}u^{4}\,dx-c(\lVert U\rVert_{L^{2}})^{2}, which is f(U)f(U) by The Quartic Energy Functional on the First Sobolev Space of the Torus §energy. This is claim 1.

Claim 2. Let XH1(Tn)X\in H^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}), let xx be a representative of XX, and put

p=2X+J(4a[x3]2(c+1)X).p=2X+J\bigl(4a\,[x^{3}]-2(c+1)X\bigr).

By Integrability of Products of Four Sobolev Classes on the Torus in Dimensions at Most Three §cube-pairing, [x3]L2(Tn)[x^{3}]\in L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}); and XL2(Tn)X\in L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) by The Sobolev Space of Once Weakly Differentiable Square-Integrable Classes on the Torus §space, so the argument of JJ lies in L2(Tn)L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) and pH1(Tn)p\in H^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}).

(a) The pairing identity. Let WH1(Tn)W\in H^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) and let ww be a representative of WW. By claim 1 of Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space together with the symmetry axiom of Real Inner Product Space §inner-product, and by the property of JJ recorded in the statement,

p,WH1=2X,WH1+4a[x3]2(c+1)X,  WL2.\langle p,W\rangle_{H^{1}}=2\,\langle X,W\rangle_{H^{1}}+\bigl\langle 4a\,[x^{3}]-2(c+1)X,\;W\bigr\rangle_{L^{2}} .

Now X,WH1=X,WL2+j=1njX,jWL2\langle X,W\rangle_{H^{1}}=\langle X,W\rangle_{L^{2}}+\sum_{j=1}^{n}\langle\partial_{j}X,\partial_{j}W\rangle_{L^{2}} by The Sobolev Space of Once Weakly Differentiable Square-Integrable Classes on the Torus §inner-product, and by claim 1 of Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space again together with Integrability of Products of Four Sobolev Classes on the Torus in Dimensions at Most Three §cube-pairing,

4a[x3]2(c+1)X,  WL2=4aTnx3wdx2(c+1)X,WL2.\bigl\langle 4a\,[x^{3}]-2(c+1)X,\;W\bigr\rangle_{L^{2}}=4a\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}x^{3}w\,dx-2(c+1)\,\langle X,W\rangle_{L^{2}} .

Since 2X,WL22(c+1)X,WL2=(22(c+1))X,WL2=2cX,WL22\langle X,W\rangle_{L^{2}}-2(c+1)\langle X,W\rangle_{L^{2}}=\bigl(2-2(c+1)\bigr)\langle X,W\rangle_{L^{2}}=-2c\,\langle X,W\rangle_{L^{2}} by distributivity and the field axioms of The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background §numbers, and since 2j=1njX,jWL22\sum_{j=1}^{n}\langle\partial_{j}X,\partial_{j}W\rangle_{L^{2}} is the finite sum of the doubled terms by claim 3 of Properties of Finite Sums, we obtain

p,WH1=2j=1njX,jWL2+4aTnx3wdx2cX,WL2,\langle p,W\rangle_{H^{1}}=2\sum_{j=1}^{n}\langle\partial_{j}X,\partial_{j}W\rangle_{L^{2}}+4a\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}x^{3}w\,dx-2c\,\langle X,W\rangle_{L^{2}} ,

which is the pairing formula asserted in claim 2.

(b) The expansion. Let WH1(Tn)W\in H^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) with representative ww. Then x+wx+w is a representative of X+WX+W by The Lebesgue Space of Power-Integrable Functions §space, and j(X+W)=jX+jW\partial_{j}(X+W)=\partial_{j}X+\partial_{j}W for j[n]j\in[n] by Elementary Properties of the Weak Partial Derivative on the Torus §linear. Claim 5 of Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space, applied in L2(Tn)L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}), gives

(jX+jWL2)2=(jXL2)2+2jX,jWL2+(jWL2)2\bigl(\lVert\partial_{j}X+\partial_{j}W\rVert_{L^{2}}\bigr)^{2}=\bigl(\lVert\partial_{j}X\rVert_{L^{2}}\bigr)^{2}+2\langle\partial_{j}X,\partial_{j}W\rangle_{L^{2}}+\bigl(\lVert\partial_{j}W\rVert_{L^{2}}\bigr)^{2}

for each j[n]j\in[n], and (X+WL2)2=(XL2)2+2X,WL2+(WL2)2(\lVert X+W\rVert_{L^{2}})^{2}=(\lVert X\rVert_{L^{2}})^{2}+2\langle X,W\rangle_{L^{2}}+(\lVert W\rVert_{L^{2}})^{2}. Summing the former over j[n]j\in[n] and using claims 2 and 3 of Properties of Finite Sums,

j=1n(j(X+W)L2)2=j=1n(jXL2)2+2j=1njX,jWL2+j=1n(jWL2)2.\sum_{j=1}^{n}\bigl(\lVert\partial_{j}(X+W)\rVert_{L^{2}}\bigr)^{2}=\sum_{j=1}^{n}\bigl(\lVert\partial_{j}X\rVert_{L^{2}}\bigr)^{2}+2\sum_{j=1}^{n}\langle\partial_{j}X,\partial_{j}W\rangle_{L^{2}}+\sum_{j=1}^{n}\bigl(\lVert\partial_{j}W\rVert_{L^{2}}\bigr)^{2}.

Next, claim 2 of The Expansion of the Square and the Fourth Power of a Sum of Real Numbers, applied at each yQy\in Q with s=x(y)s=x(y) and t=w(y)t=w(y), gives valuewise on QQ

(x+w)4=x4+4x3w+6x2w2+4xw3+w4,(x+w)^{4}=x^{4}+4\,x^{3}w+6\,x^{2}w^{2}+4\,x\,w^{3}+w^{4},

each term on the right being a real multiple of a pointwise product of four of the maps xx and ww, by claim 1 of Properties of Natural Number Powers in a Field. By Integrability of Products of Four Sobolev Classes on the Torus in Dimensions at Most Three §product, applied with the four classes chosen among XX and WW to match each term, the maps x4x^{4}, x3wx^{3}w, x2w2x^{2}w^{2}, xw3xw^{3} and w4w^{4} all lie in L1(Tn)\mathcal{L}^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) and hence are integrable by Step 0; so Linearity of the Lebesgue Integral over a Finite Sum of Integrable Functions, applied to them with the coefficients 1,4,6,4,11,4,6,4,1, gives

Tn(x+w)4dx=Tnx4dx+4Tnx3wdx+6Tnx2w2dx+4Tnxw3dx+Tnw4dx.\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}(x+w)^{4}dx=\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}x^{4}dx+4\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}x^{3}w\,dx+6\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}x^{2}w^{2}dx+4\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}xw^{3}dx+\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}w^{4}dx .

Evaluating f(X+W)f(X+W) by The Quartic Energy Functional on the First Sobolev Space of the Torus §energy with the representative x+wx+w and substituting the three expansions,

f(X+W)=f(X)+2j=1njX,jWL2+4aTnx3wdx2cX,WL2+S(W),f(X+W)=f(X)+2\sum_{j=1}^{n}\langle\partial_{j}X,\partial_{j}W\rangle_{L^{2}}+4a\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}x^{3}w\,dx-2c\,\langle X,W\rangle_{L^{2}}+S(W),

where

S(W)=j=1n(jWL2)2c(WL2)2+a(6Tnx2w2dx+4Tnxw3dx+Tnw4dx).S(W)=\sum_{j=1}^{n}\bigl(\lVert\partial_{j}W\rVert_{L^{2}}\bigr)^{2}-c\,\bigl(\lVert W\rVert_{L^{2}}\bigr)^{2}+a\Bigl(6\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}x^{2}w^{2}dx+4\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}xw^{3}dx+\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}w^{4}dx\Bigr).

By (a) the terms between f(X)f(X) and S(W)S(W) are exactly p,WH1\langle p,W\rangle_{H^{1}}, so

f(X+W)f(X)p,WH1=S(W).f(X+W)-f(X)-\langle p,W\rangle_{H^{1}}=S(W).

(c) The remainder bound. Write ρ=WH1\rho=\lVert W\rVert_{H^{1}} and β=XH1\beta=\lVert X\rVert_{H^{1}}, both nonnegative by Real Inner Product Space §norm. By The Sobolev Space of Once Weakly Differentiable Square-Integrable Classes on the Torus §inner-product and Real Inner Product Space §norm,

ρ2=(WL2)2+j=1n(jWL2)2,\rho^{2}=\bigl(\lVert W\rVert_{L^{2}}\bigr)^{2}+\sum_{j=1}^{n}\bigl(\lVert\partial_{j}W\rVert_{L^{2}}\bigr)^{2},

and both summands are nonnegative (the second by claim 5 of Properties of Finite Sums), so claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives j=1n(jWL2)2ρ2\sum_{j=1}^{n}(\lVert\partial_{j}W\rVert_{L^{2}})^{2}\le\rho^{2} and (WL2)2ρ2(\lVert W\rVert_{L^{2}})^{2}\le\rho^{2}. By Integrability of Products of Four Sobolev Classes on the Torus in Dimensions at Most Three §product,

Tnx2w2dx625β2ρ2,Tnxw3dx625βρ3,Tnw4dx625ρ4.\Bigl|\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}x^{2}w^{2}dx\Bigr|\le625\,\beta^{2}\rho^{2},\qquad\Bigl|\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}xw^{3}dx\Bigr|\le625\,\beta\rho^{3},\qquad\Bigl|\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}w^{4}dx\Bigr|\le625\,\rho^{4}.

Hence, by claims 4 and 5 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field (multiplicativity and the triangle inequality) together with claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and distributivity,

S(W)(1+c)ρ2+625a(6β2ρ2+4βρ3+ρ4).|S(W)|\le(1+|c|)\rho^{2}+625\,|a|\bigl(6\beta^{2}\rho^{2}+4\beta\rho^{3}+\rho^{4}\bigr).

Suppose moreover that ρ1\rho\le1. The powers ρ2\rho^{2} and ρ3\rho^{3} are nonnegative by claim 5 of Properties of Natural Number Powers in a Field, so claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field together with claim 1 of Properties of Natural Number Powers in a Field gives ρ3=ρ2ρρ2\rho^{3}=\rho^{2}\rho\le\rho^{2} and ρ4=ρ3ρρ3ρ2\rho^{4}=\rho^{3}\rho\le\rho^{3}\le\rho^{2}. Applying claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field once more with the nonnegative multipliers and collecting by distributivity,

S(W)Kρ2,where K=1+c+625a(6β2+4β+1),|S(W)|\le K\rho^{2},\qquad\text{where }K=1+|c|+625\,|a|\,\bigl(6\beta^{2}+4\beta+1\bigr),

and 1K1\le K, every further summand being nonnegative by claims 1, 2 and 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field.

(d) Differentiability. Let εR\varepsilon\in\mathbb{R} be positive. Since 1K1\le K the number KK is positive, so εK\tfrac{\varepsilon}{K} is positive by claims 7 and 5 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field; let δ\delta be the lesser of 11 and εK\tfrac{\varepsilon}{K}, which exists by claim 9 of that lemma and is positive, being one of the two. Let ZH1(Tn)Z\in H^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) satisfy ZH1<δ\lVert Z\rVert_{H^{1}}<\delta. Then X+ZH1(Tn)X+Z\in H^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}), this being a linear subspace of L2(Tn)L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) by The Sobolev Space of Once Weakly Differentiable Square-Integrable Classes on the Torus §space, and ZH11\lVert Z\rVert_{H^{1}}\le1; so (b) and (c), applied with W=ZW=Z and ρ=ZH1\rho=\lVert Z\rVert_{H^{1}}, give

f(X+Z)f(X)p,ZH1=S(Z)Kρ2=(Kρ)ρ(Kδ)ρερ,\bigl|f(X+Z)-f(X)-\langle p,Z\rangle_{H^{1}}\bigr|=|S(Z)|\le K\rho^{2}=(K\rho)\,\rho\le(K\delta)\,\rho\le\varepsilon\,\rho ,

the last two steps by claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, using ρδ\rho\le\delta and KδKεK=εK\delta\le K\cdot\tfrac{\varepsilon}{K}=\varepsilon. Since ε\varepsilon was an arbitrary positive real number, ff is differentiable at XX with gradient pp in the sense of Fréchet Differentiability and the Gradient on an Open Subset of a Real Inner Product Space §differentiable, so Df(X)=pDf(X)=p by Fréchet Differentiability and the Gradient on an Open Subset of a Real Inner Product Space §gradient. As XX was an arbitrary member of H1(Tn)H^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}), ff is differentiable on H1(Tn)H^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) by Fréchet Differentiability and the Gradient on an Open Subset of a Real Inner Product Space §on-set. Together with (a) this proves claim 2.

Claim 3. Let XD(A)X\in D(A) and let xx be a representative of XX. Put

Z0=AX+2a[x3](c+1)X,Z_{0}=AX+2a\,[x^{3}]-(c+1)X ,

a member of L2(Tn)L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}), since AXL2(Tn)AX\in L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) by Hilbert Triples: Standing Notation and Background §operator, [x3]L2(Tn)[x^{3}]\in L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) by Integrability of Products of Four Sobolev Classes on the Torus in Dimensions at Most Three §cube-pairing and XL2(Tn)X\in L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) by The Sobolev Space of Once Weakly Differentiable Square-Integrable Classes on the Torus §space. The map JJ is linear by Elementary Properties of a Hilbert Triple: the Embedding, the Riesz Map and the Form Operator §riesz-map, and J(AX)=XJ(AX)=X by Elementary Properties of a Hilbert Triple: the Embedding, the Riesz Map and the Form Operator §range. Hence, writing Y=2a[x3](c+1)XY=2a\,[x^{3}]-(c+1)X so that Z0=AX+YZ_{0}=AX+Y and 2Y=4a[x3]2(c+1)X2Y=4a\,[x^{3}]-2(c+1)X,

2J(Z0)=2J(AX)+2J(Y)=2X+J(2Y)=2X+J(4a[x3]2(c+1)X)=Df(X)2J(Z_{0})=2J(AX)+2J(Y)=2X+J(2Y)=2X+J\bigl(4a\,[x^{3}]-2(c+1)X\bigr)=Df(X)

by claim 2. If ZL2(Tn)Z\in L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) also satisfies Df(X)=2JZDf(X)=2JZ, then 2JZ=2JZ02JZ=2JZ_{0}; the real number 22 is positive, hence nonzero and invertible, by claim 3 of Properties of the Canonical Map from the Natural Numbers to an Ordered Field, so multiplying both sides by 212^{-1} and using associativity of multiplication, the inverse axiom and the multiplicative identity axiom of The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background §numbers gives JZ=JZ0JZ=JZ_{0}; and Z=Z0Z=Z_{0} because JJ is injective by Elementary Properties of a Hilbert Triple: the Embedding, the Riesz Map and the Form Operator §riesz-map. Thus Z0Z_{0} is the unique member of L2(Tn)L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) with Df(X)=2JZ0Df(X)=2JZ_{0}.

Finally suppose 0a0\le a and take b=2ab=2a and κ=c+1\kappa=c+1. Then b=a+ab=a+a by distributivity, so 0b0\le b by claim 2 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, and the maps BB and LL of Well-Posedness of the Allen-Cahn Hamilton-Jacobi Equation on the Torus §data are formed for admissible data. For them, B(X)=b[x3]=2a[x3]B(X)=b\,[x^{3}]=2a\,[x^{3}] and L(X)=κX=(c+1)XL(X)=-\kappa X=-(c+1)X, so

AX+B(X)+L(X)=AX+2a[x3](c+1)X=Z0,AX+B(X)+L(X)=AX+2a\,[x^{3}]-(c+1)X=Z_{0},

which completes claim 3.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…