TheoremBase

The first-order terms of the expansion of the energy at a point are collected into a single inner product against the claimed gradient, and the remaining quartic and quadratic terms are bounded by a constant multiple of the squared Sobolev norm of the increment, which gives differentiability.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement and is applied here to the data at hand; the notation is that of the statement, and the measure space throughout is (Q,BQ,λQ)(Q,\mathcal{B}_{Q},\lambda_{Q}) of The Flat Torus: Standing Notation (iii).

Step 0 (Membership in L1(Tn)\mathcal{L}^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) and integrability). Let h:Q→Rh:Q\to\mathbb{R} be measurable. By Properties of Real Powers (ii) the power of a nonnegative real number with exponent 11 is that number itself, so the map ∣h∣1|h|^{1} of Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm (i) is ∣h∣|h|; hence by Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm (ii) and the last sentence of Integrable Functions and Their Lebesgue Integral, h∈L1(Tn)h\in\mathcal{L}^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) if and only if hh is integrable.

Step 1 (Squares). Let Z∈L2(Tn)Z\in L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) and let zz be a representative of ZZ. Then the pointwise square z2z^{2} lies in L1(Tn)\mathcal{L}^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) and

∫Tnz2 dx=⟨Z,Z⟩L2=(∥Z∥L2)2.\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}z^{2}\,dx=\langle Z,Z\rangle_{L^{2}}=\bigl(\lVert Z\rVert_{L^{2}}\bigr)^{2}.

Indeed z2=zzz^{2}=zz valuewise by claim 1 of Properties of Natural Number Powers in a Field; L²(μ) Is a Real Hilbert Space (i), applied to zz and zz, gives that zzzz is integrable — hence in L1(Tn)\mathcal{L}^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) by Step 0 — with ∫Tnzz dx=⟨[z],[z]⟩L2=⟨Z,Z⟩L2\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}zz\,dx=\langle[z],[z]\rangle_{L^{2}}=\langle Z,Z\rangle_{L^{2}}; and the norm of Real Inner Product Spaces (ii) is the nonnegative square root of ⟨Z,Z⟩L2\langle Z,Z\rangle_{L^{2}}, whose square is ⟨Z,Z⟩L2\langle Z,Z\rangle_{L^{2}}.

Claim 1. Let UU, uu and g1,…,gng_{1},\dots,g_{n} be as in the claim. By The Sobolev Space of Once Weakly Differentiable Square-Integrable Classes on the Torus (i), U∈L2(Tn)U\in L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) and ∂jU∈L2(Tn)\partial_{j}U\in L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) for every j∈[n]j\in[n], so Step 1 gives u2,g12,…,gn2∈L1(Tn)u^{2},g_{1}^{2},\dots,g_{n}^{2}\in\mathcal{L}^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) with

∫Tnu2 dx=(∥U∥L2)2,∫Tngj2 dx=(∥∂jU∥L2)2(j∈[n]);\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}u^{2}\,dx=\bigl(\lVert U\rVert_{L^{2}}\bigr)^{2},\qquad\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}g_{j}^{2}\,dx=\bigl(\lVert\partial_{j}U\rVert_{L^{2}}\bigr)^{2}\quad(j\in[n]);

and u4∈L1(Tn)u^{4}\in\mathcal{L}^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) by Integrability of Products of Four Sobolev Classes on the Torus in Dimensions at Most Three (ii). All these maps are integrable by Step 0. Apply Linearity of the Lebesgue Integral over a Finite Sum of Integrable Functions with the n+2n+2 integrable maps g12,…,gn2,u4,u2g_{1}^{2},\dots,g_{n}^{2},u^{4},u^{2} and the coefficients 1,…,1,a,−c1,\dots,1,a,-c: by the recursion in claim 1 of Properties of Finite Sums and the multiplicative identity axiom, the resulting map is the pointwise combination ∑j=1ngj2+a u4−c u2\sum_{j=1}^{n}g_{j}^{2}+a\,u^{4}-c\,u^{2} and the resulting sum of integrals regroups in the same way, so that map is integrable, hence lies in L1(Tn)\mathcal{L}^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) by Step 0, and

∫Tn(∑j=1ngj2+a u4−c u2)dx=∑j=1n∫Tngj2 dx+a∫Tnu4 dx−c∫Tnu2 dx.\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}\Bigl(\sum_{j=1}^{n}g_{j}^{2}+a\,u^{4}-c\,u^{2}\Bigr)dx=\sum_{j=1}^{n}\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}g_{j}^{2}\,dx+a\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}u^{4}\,dx-c\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}u^{2}\,dx .

Substituting the three identities displayed above, the right-hand side is ∑j=1n(∥∂jU∥L2)2+a∫Tnu4 dx−c(∥U∥L2)2\sum_{j=1}^{n}(\lVert\partial_{j}U\rVert_{L^{2}})^{2}+a\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}u^{4}\,dx-c(\lVert U\rVert_{L^{2}})^{2}, which is f(U)f(U) by The Quartic Energy Functional on the First Sobolev Space of the Torus (i). This is claim 1.

Claim 2. Let X∈H1(Tn)X\in H^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}), let xx be a representative of XX, and put

p=2X+J(4a [x3]−2(c+1)X).p=2X+J\bigl(4a\,[x^{3}]-2(c+1)X\bigr).

By Integrability of Products of Four Sobolev Classes on the Torus in Dimensions at Most Three (iii), [x3]∈L2(Tn)[x^{3}]\in L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}); and X∈L2(Tn)X\in L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) by The Sobolev Space of Once Weakly Differentiable Square-Integrable Classes on the Torus (i), so the argument of JJ lies in L2(Tn)L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) and p∈H1(Tn)p\in H^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}).

(a) The pairing identity. Let W∈H1(Tn)W\in H^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) and let ww be a representative of WW. By claim 1 of Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space together with the symmetry axiom of Real Inner Product Spaces (i), and by the property of JJ recorded in the statement,

⟨p,W⟩H1=2 ⟨X,W⟩H1+⟨4a [x3]−2(c+1)X,  W⟩L2.\langle p,W\rangle_{H^{1}}=2\,\langle X,W\rangle_{H^{1}}+\bigl\langle 4a\,[x^{3}]-2(c+1)X,\;W\bigr\rangle_{L^{2}} .

Now ⟨X,W⟩H1=⟨X,W⟩L2+∑j=1n⟨∂jX,∂jW⟩L2\langle X,W\rangle_{H^{1}}=\langle X,W\rangle_{L^{2}}+\sum_{j=1}^{n}\langle\partial_{j}X,\partial_{j}W\rangle_{L^{2}} by The Sobolev Space of Once Weakly Differentiable Square-Integrable Classes on the Torus (ii), and by claim 1 of Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space again together with Integrability of Products of Four Sobolev Classes on the Torus in Dimensions at Most Three (iii),

⟨4a [x3]−2(c+1)X,  W⟩L2=4a∫Tnx3w dx−2(c+1) ⟨X,W⟩L2.\bigl\langle 4a\,[x^{3}]-2(c+1)X,\;W\bigr\rangle_{L^{2}}=4a\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}x^{3}w\,dx-2(c+1)\,\langle X,W\rangle_{L^{2}} .

Since 2⟨X,W⟩L2−2(c+1)⟨X,W⟩L2=(2−2(c+1))⟨X,W⟩L2=−2c ⟨X,W⟩L22\langle X,W\rangle_{L^{2}}-2(c+1)\langle X,W\rangle_{L^{2}}=\bigl(2-2(c+1)\bigr)\langle X,W\rangle_{L^{2}}=-2c\,\langle X,W\rangle_{L^{2}} by distributivity and the field axioms of The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background (i), and since 2∑j=1n⟨∂jX,∂jW⟩L22\sum_{j=1}^{n}\langle\partial_{j}X,\partial_{j}W\rangle_{L^{2}} is the finite sum of the doubled terms by claim 3 of Properties of Finite Sums, we obtain

⟨p,W⟩H1=2∑j=1n⟨∂jX,∂jW⟩L2+4a∫Tnx3w dx−2c ⟨X,W⟩L2,\langle p,W\rangle_{H^{1}}=2\sum_{j=1}^{n}\langle\partial_{j}X,\partial_{j}W\rangle_{L^{2}}+4a\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}x^{3}w\,dx-2c\,\langle X,W\rangle_{L^{2}} ,

which is the pairing formula asserted in claim 2.

(b) The expansion. Let W∈H1(Tn)W\in H^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) with representative ww. Then x+wx+w is a representative of X+WX+W by The Lebesgue Space Lᵖ(μ) (ii), and ∂j(X+W)=∂jX+∂jW\partial_{j}(X+W)=\partial_{j}X+\partial_{j}W for j∈[n]j\in[n] by Elementary Properties of the Weak Partial Derivative on the Torus (ii). Claim 5 of Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space, applied in L2(Tn)L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}), gives

(∥∂jX+∂jW∥L2)2=(∥∂jX∥L2)2+2⟨∂jX,∂jW⟩L2+(∥∂jW∥L2)2\bigl(\lVert\partial_{j}X+\partial_{j}W\rVert_{L^{2}}\bigr)^{2}=\bigl(\lVert\partial_{j}X\rVert_{L^{2}}\bigr)^{2}+2\langle\partial_{j}X,\partial_{j}W\rangle_{L^{2}}+\bigl(\lVert\partial_{j}W\rVert_{L^{2}}\bigr)^{2}

for each j∈[n]j\in[n], and (∥X+W∥L2)2=(∥X∥L2)2+2⟨X,W⟩L2+(∥W∥L2)2(\lVert X+W\rVert_{L^{2}})^{2}=(\lVert X\rVert_{L^{2}})^{2}+2\langle X,W\rangle_{L^{2}}+(\lVert W\rVert_{L^{2}})^{2}. Summing the former over j∈[n]j\in[n] and using claims 2 and 3 of Properties of Finite Sums,

∑j=1n(∥∂j(X+W)∥L2)2=∑j=1n(∥∂jX∥L2)2+2∑j=1n⟨∂jX,∂jW⟩L2+∑j=1n(∥∂jW∥L2)2.\sum_{j=1}^{n}\bigl(\lVert\partial_{j}(X+W)\rVert_{L^{2}}\bigr)^{2}=\sum_{j=1}^{n}\bigl(\lVert\partial_{j}X\rVert_{L^{2}}\bigr)^{2}+2\sum_{j=1}^{n}\langle\partial_{j}X,\partial_{j}W\rangle_{L^{2}}+\sum_{j=1}^{n}\bigl(\lVert\partial_{j}W\rVert_{L^{2}}\bigr)^{2}.

Next, claim 2 of The Expansion of the Square and the Fourth Power of a Sum of Real Numbers, applied at each y∈Qy\in Q with s=x(y)s=x(y) and t=w(y)t=w(y), gives valuewise on QQ

(x+w)4=x4+4 x3w+6 x2w2+4 x w3+w4,(x+w)^{4}=x^{4}+4\,x^{3}w+6\,x^{2}w^{2}+4\,x\,w^{3}+w^{4},

each term on the right being a real multiple of a pointwise product of four of the maps xx and ww, by claim 1 of Properties of Natural Number Powers in a Field. By Integrability of Products of Four Sobolev Classes on the Torus in Dimensions at Most Three (i), applied with the four classes chosen among XX and WW to match each term, the maps x4x^{4}, x3wx^{3}w, x2w2x^{2}w^{2}, xw3xw^{3} and w4w^{4} all lie in L1(Tn)\mathcal{L}^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) and hence are integrable by Step 0; so Linearity of the Lebesgue Integral over a Finite Sum of Integrable Functions, applied to them with the coefficients 1,4,6,4,11,4,6,4,1, gives

∫Tn(x+w)4dx=∫Tnx4dx+4∫Tnx3w dx+6∫Tnx2w2dx+4∫Tnxw3dx+∫Tnw4dx.\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}(x+w)^{4}dx=\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}x^{4}dx+4\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}x^{3}w\,dx+6\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}x^{2}w^{2}dx+4\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}xw^{3}dx+\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}w^{4}dx .

Evaluating f(X+W)f(X+W) by The Quartic Energy Functional on the First Sobolev Space of the Torus (i) with the representative x+wx+w and substituting the three expansions,

f(X+W)=f(X)+2∑j=1n⟨∂jX,∂jW⟩L2+4a∫Tnx3w dx−2c ⟨X,W⟩L2+S(W),f(X+W)=f(X)+2\sum_{j=1}^{n}\langle\partial_{j}X,\partial_{j}W\rangle_{L^{2}}+4a\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}x^{3}w\,dx-2c\,\langle X,W\rangle_{L^{2}}+S(W),

where

S(W)=∑j=1n(∥∂jW∥L2)2−c (∥W∥L2)2+a(6∫Tnx2w2dx+4∫Tnxw3dx+∫Tnw4dx).S(W)=\sum_{j=1}^{n}\bigl(\lVert\partial_{j}W\rVert_{L^{2}}\bigr)^{2}-c\,\bigl(\lVert W\rVert_{L^{2}}\bigr)^{2}+a\Bigl(6\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}x^{2}w^{2}dx+4\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}xw^{3}dx+\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}w^{4}dx\Bigr).

By (a) the terms between f(X)f(X) and S(W)S(W) are exactly ⟨p,W⟩H1\langle p,W\rangle_{H^{1}}, so

f(X+W)−f(X)−⟨p,W⟩H1=S(W).f(X+W)-f(X)-\langle p,W\rangle_{H^{1}}=S(W).

(c) The remainder bound. Write ρ=∥W∥H1\rho=\lVert W\rVert_{H^{1}} and β=∥X∥H1\beta=\lVert X\rVert_{H^{1}}, both nonnegative by Real Inner Product Spaces (ii). By The Sobolev Space of Once Weakly Differentiable Square-Integrable Classes on the Torus (ii) and Real Inner Product Spaces (ii),

ρ2=(∥W∥L2)2+∑j=1n(∥∂jW∥L2)2,\rho^{2}=\bigl(\lVert W\rVert_{L^{2}}\bigr)^{2}+\sum_{j=1}^{n}\bigl(\lVert\partial_{j}W\rVert_{L^{2}}\bigr)^{2},

and both summands are nonnegative (the second by claim 5 of Properties of Finite Sums), so claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives ∑j=1n(∥∂jW∥L2)2≤ρ2\sum_{j=1}^{n}(\lVert\partial_{j}W\rVert_{L^{2}})^{2}\le\rho^{2} and (∥W∥L2)2≤ρ2(\lVert W\rVert_{L^{2}})^{2}\le\rho^{2}. By Integrability of Products of Four Sobolev Classes on the Torus in Dimensions at Most Three (i),

∣∫Tnx2w2dx∣≤625 β2ρ2,∣∫Tnxw3dx∣≤625 βρ3,∣∫Tnw4dx∣≤625 ρ4.\Bigl|\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}x^{2}w^{2}dx\Bigr|\le625\,\beta^{2}\rho^{2},\qquad\Bigl|\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}xw^{3}dx\Bigr|\le625\,\beta\rho^{3},\qquad\Bigl|\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}w^{4}dx\Bigr|\le625\,\rho^{4}.

Hence, by claims 4 and 5 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field (multiplicativity and the triangle inequality) together with claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and distributivity,

∣S(W)∣≤(1+∣c∣)ρ2+625 ∣a∣(6β2ρ2+4βρ3+ρ4).|S(W)|\le(1+|c|)\rho^{2}+625\,|a|\bigl(6\beta^{2}\rho^{2}+4\beta\rho^{3}+\rho^{4}\bigr).

Suppose moreover that ρ≤1\rho\le1. The powers ρ2\rho^{2} and ρ3\rho^{3} are nonnegative by claim 5 of Properties of Natural Number Powers in a Field, so claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field together with claim 1 of Properties of Natural Number Powers in a Field gives ρ3=ρ2ρ≤ρ2\rho^{3}=\rho^{2}\rho\le\rho^{2} and ρ4=ρ3ρ≤ρ3≤ρ2\rho^{4}=\rho^{3}\rho\le\rho^{3}\le\rho^{2}. Applying claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field once more with the nonnegative multipliers and collecting by distributivity,

∣S(W)∣≤Kρ2,where K=1+∣c∣+625 ∣a∣ (6β2+4β+1),|S(W)|\le K\rho^{2},\qquad\text{where }K=1+|c|+625\,|a|\,\bigl(6\beta^{2}+4\beta+1\bigr),

and 1≤K1\le K, every further summand being nonnegative by claims 1, 2 and 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field.

(d) Differentiability. Let ε∈R\varepsilon\in\mathbb{R} be positive. Since 1≤K1\le K the number KK is positive, so εK\tfrac{\varepsilon}{K} is positive by claims 7 and 5 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field; let δ\delta be the lesser of 11 and εK\tfrac{\varepsilon}{K}, which exists by claim 9 of that lemma and is positive, being one of the two. Let Z∈H1(Tn)Z\in H^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) satisfy ∥Z∥H1<δ\lVert Z\rVert_{H^{1}}<\delta. Then X+Z∈H1(Tn)X+Z\in H^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}), this being a linear subspace of L2(Tn)L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) by The Sobolev Space of Once Weakly Differentiable Square-Integrable Classes on the Torus (i), and ∥Z∥H1≤1\lVert Z\rVert_{H^{1}}\le1; so (b) and (c), applied with W=ZW=Z and ρ=∥Z∥H1\rho=\lVert Z\rVert_{H^{1}}, give

∣f(X+Z)−f(X)−⟨p,Z⟩H1∣=∣S(Z)∣≤Kρ2=(Kρ) ρ≤(Kδ) ρ≤ε ρ,\bigl|f(X+Z)-f(X)-\langle p,Z\rangle_{H^{1}}\bigr|=|S(Z)|\le K\rho^{2}=(K\rho)\,\rho\le(K\delta)\,\rho\le\varepsilon\,\rho ,

the last two steps by claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, using ρ≤δ\rho\le\delta and Kδ≤K⋅εK=εK\delta\le K\cdot\tfrac{\varepsilon}{K}=\varepsilon. Since ε\varepsilon was an arbitrary positive real number, ff is differentiable at XX with gradient pp in the sense of Fréchet Differentiability and the Gradient on an Open Subset of a Real Inner Product Space (i), so Df(X)=pDf(X)=p by Fréchet Differentiability and the Gradient on an Open Subset of a Real Inner Product Space (ii). As XX was an arbitrary member of H1(Tn)H^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}), ff is differentiable on H1(Tn)H^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) by Fréchet Differentiability and the Gradient on an Open Subset of a Real Inner Product Space (iii). Together with (a) this proves claim 2.

Claim 3. Let X∈D(A)X\in D(A) and let xx be a representative of XX. Put

Z0=AX+2a [x3]−(c+1)X,Z_{0}=AX+2a\,[x^{3}]-(c+1)X ,

a member of L2(Tn)L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}), since AX∈L2(Tn)AX\in L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) by Hilbert Triples: Standing Notation and Background (iii), [x3]∈L2(Tn)[x^{3}]\in L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) by Integrability of Products of Four Sobolev Classes on the Torus in Dimensions at Most Three (iii) and X∈L2(Tn)X\in L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) by The Sobolev Space of Once Weakly Differentiable Square-Integrable Classes on the Torus (i). The map JJ is linear by Elementary Properties of a Hilbert Triple: the Embedding, the Riesz Map and the Form Operator (ii), and J(AX)=XJ(AX)=X by Elementary Properties of a Hilbert Triple: the Embedding, the Riesz Map and the Form Operator (iii). Hence, writing Y=2a [x3]−(c+1)XY=2a\,[x^{3}]-(c+1)X so that Z0=AX+YZ_{0}=AX+Y and 2Y=4a [x3]−2(c+1)X2Y=4a\,[x^{3}]-2(c+1)X,

2J(Z0)=2J(AX)+2J(Y)=2X+J(2Y)=2X+J(4a [x3]−2(c+1)X)=Df(X)2J(Z_{0})=2J(AX)+2J(Y)=2X+J(2Y)=2X+J\bigl(4a\,[x^{3}]-2(c+1)X\bigr)=Df(X)

by claim 2. If Z∈L2(Tn)Z\in L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) also satisfies Df(X)=2JZDf(X)=2JZ, then 2JZ=2JZ02JZ=2JZ_{0}; the real number 22 is positive, hence nonzero and invertible, by claim 3 of Properties of the Canonical Map from the Natural Numbers to an Ordered Field, so multiplying both sides by 2−12^{-1} and using associativity of multiplication, the inverse axiom and the multiplicative identity axiom of The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background (i) gives JZ=JZ0JZ=JZ_{0}; and Z=Z0Z=Z_{0} because JJ is injective by Elementary Properties of a Hilbert Triple: the Embedding, the Riesz Map and the Form Operator (ii). Thus Z0Z_{0} is the unique member of L2(Tn)L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) with Df(X)=2JZ0Df(X)=2JZ_{0}.

Finally suppose 0≤a0\le a and take b=2ab=2a and κ=c+1\kappa=c+1. Then b=a+ab=a+a by distributivity, so 0≤b0\le b by claim 2 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, and the maps BB and LL of Well-Posedness of the Allen-Cahn Hamilton-Jacobi Equation on the Torus (i) are formed for admissible data. For them, B(X)=b [x3]=2a [x3]B(X)=b\,[x^{3}]=2a\,[x^{3}] and L(X)=−κX=−(c+1)XL(X)=-\kappa X=-(c+1)X, so

AX+B(X)+L(X)=AX+2a [x3]−(c+1)X=Z0,AX+B(X)+L(X)=AX+2a\,[x^{3}]-(c+1)X=Z_{0},

which completes claim 3.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…