TheoremBase

Proof of Basic Properties of the Mean-Square Riemann Integral

lemmalem:mean-square-riemann-integral-properties-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron Β·
Verified by 0 users Β· Flagged by 0 users
Reason: Kalman-Bucy phase Block A: proof via Riemann-sum limits; internally reviewed and validated; batch-approved by Aaron on 2026-07-31.

Proof

Fix versions of all mean-square Riemann integrals appearing; they exist by Existence and Uniqueness of the Mean-Square Riemann Integral for Mean-Square Continuous Families. For a mean-square continuous family (Kt)t∈[s,tβ€²](K_t)_{t\in[s,t']} and nβ‰₯1n\ge1, write Sn(K;[s,tβ€²])S_n(K;[s,t']) for the mean-square Riemann sum over the partition of [s,tβ€²][s,t'] into nn equal intervals with left endpoints as tags, and abbreviate Sn(K)=Sn(K;[a,b])S_n(K)=S_n(K;[a,b]). By Mean-Square Riemann Integral of a Family of Random Variables, βˆ₯Sn(K;[s,tβ€²])βˆ’βˆ«stβ€²Ku duβˆ₯2β†’0\lVert S_n(K;[s,t'])-\int_s^{t'}K_u\,du\rVert_2\to0 for every version of the integral. We use throughout the triangle inequality and Cauchy-Schwarz inequality of Cauchy-Schwarz and Triangle Inequalities for the Mean-Square Norm, and uniqueness of mean-square limits: if βˆ₯Znβˆ’Vβˆ₯2β†’0\lVert Z_n-V\rVert_2\to0 and βˆ₯Znβˆ’Vβ€²βˆ₯2β†’0\lVert Z_n-V'\rVert_2\to0 then βˆ₯Vβˆ’Vβ€²βˆ₯2=0\lVert V-V'\rVert_2=0, so V=Vβ€²V=V' almost surely by Square-Integrable Random Variables and the Mean-Square Inner Product. Thus, to prove each asserted identity it suffices to show that the mean-square Riemann sums converge in mean square to the right-hand side; the version convention of Mean-Square Riemann Integral of a Family of Random Variables is then satisfied because every version is also a limit of the same sums.

We also record: if Ο†:[s,tβ€²]β†’R\varphi:[s,t']\to\mathbb{R} is continuous (s<tβ€²s<t'), then the ordinary Riemann sums Rn(Ο†;[s,tβ€²])R_n(\varphi;[s,t']) over the same left-tagged uniform partitions converge to the Riemann integral ∫stβ€²Ο†(u) du\int_s^{t'}\varphi(u)\,du; abbreviate Rn(Ο†)=Rn(Ο†;[a,b])R_n(\varphi)=R_n(\varphi;[a,b]). Indeed Ο†\varphi is Riemann integrable by Continuous Functions on a Closed Interval are Riemann Integrable, and Riemann Integrability on a Closed Interval states precisely that for every Ξ΅>0\varepsilon>0 there is Ξ΄>0\delta>0 such that every Riemann sum on a tagged partition of mesh less than Ξ΄\delta is within Ξ΅\varepsilon of the integral; the mesh (tβ€²βˆ’s)/n(t'-s)/n tends to 00. Linearity and monotonicity of the Riemann integral on continuous integrands follow from Agreement of the Riemann and Lebesgue Integrals for Continuous Functions on a Closed Interval together with Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral.

1. Mean-square continuity of (Ξ±Ht+Ξ²Gt)(\alpha H_t+\beta G_t): βˆ₯(Ξ±Ht+Ξ²Gt)βˆ’(Ξ±Hs+Ξ²Gs)βˆ₯2β‰€βˆ£Ξ±βˆ£βˆ₯Htβˆ’Hsβˆ₯2+∣β∣βˆ₯Gtβˆ’Gsβˆ₯2\lVert(\alpha H_t+\beta G_t)-(\alpha H_s+\beta G_s)\rVert_2\le|\alpha|\lVert H_t-H_s\rVert_2+|\beta|\lVert G_t-G_s\rVert_2. The sums satisfy Sn(Ξ±H+Ξ²G)=Ξ±Sn(H)+Ξ²Sn(G)S_n(\alpha H+\beta G)=\alpha S_n(H)+\beta S_n(G) exactly, and

βˆ₯Sn(Ξ±H+Ξ²G)βˆ’(α∫abHt dt+β∫abGt dt)βˆ₯2β‰€βˆ£Ξ±βˆ£β€‰βˆ₯Sn(H)βˆ’βˆ«abHt dtβˆ₯2+βˆ£Ξ²βˆ£β€‰βˆ₯Sn(G)βˆ’βˆ«abGt dtβˆ₯2β†’0.\Bigl\lVert S_n(\alpha H+\beta G)-\Bigl(\alpha\int_a^b H_t\,dt+\beta\int_a^b G_t\,dt\Bigr)\Bigr\rVert_2\le|\alpha|\,\Bigl\lVert S_n(H)-\int_a^b H_t\,dt\Bigr\rVert_2+|\beta|\,\Bigl\lVert S_n(G)-\int_a^b G_t\,dt\Bigr\rVert_2\to0 .

2. Product family. For s,t∈[a,b]s,t\in[a,b],

βˆ₯c(t)Htβˆ’c(s)Hsβˆ₯2β‰€βˆ£c(t)βˆ£β€‰βˆ₯Htβˆ’Hsβˆ₯2+∣c(t)βˆ’c(s)βˆ£β€‰βˆ₯Hsβˆ₯2.\lVert c(t)H_t-c(s)H_s\rVert_2\le|c(t)|\,\lVert H_t-H_s\rVert_2+|c(t)-c(s)|\,\lVert H_s\rVert_2 .

The function ∣c∣|c| is bounded on [a,b][a,b] by Extreme Value Theorem on a Compact Interval, and sup⁑s∈[a,b]βˆ₯Hsβˆ₯2\sup_{s\in[a,b]}\lVert H_s\rVert_2 is finite because s↦E[Hs2]s\mapsto\mathbb{E}[H_s^2] is bounded by Uniform Mean-Square Continuity on a Compact Interval; mean-square continuity of (c(t)Ht)(c(t)H_t) at each point follows from continuity of cc and mean-square continuity of (Ht)(H_t). Constant random factor. βˆ₯c(t)Zβˆ’c(s)Zβˆ₯2=∣c(t)βˆ’c(s)βˆ£β€‰βˆ₯Zβˆ₯2\lVert c(t)Z-c(s)Z\rVert_2=|c(t)-c(s)|\,\lVert Z\rVert_2, so (c(t)Z)(c(t)Z) is mean-square continuous, and Sn(cZ)=Rn(c) ZS_n(cZ)=R_n(c)\,Z, with βˆ₯Rn(c)Zβˆ’(∫abc)Zβˆ₯2=∣Rn(c)βˆ’βˆ«abcβˆ£β€‰βˆ₯Zβˆ₯2β†’0\lVert R_n(c)Z-(\int_a^b c)Z\rVert_2=|R_n(c)-\int_a^b c|\,\lVert Z\rVert_2\to0 by the recorded fact.

3. By Cauchy-Schwarz, ∣E[ZHt]βˆ’E[ZHs]∣=∣E[Z(Htβˆ’Hs)]βˆ£β‰€βˆ₯Zβˆ₯2βˆ₯Htβˆ’Hsβˆ₯2|\mathbb{E}[ZH_t]-\mathbb{E}[ZH_s]|=|\mathbb{E}[Z(H_t-H_s)]|\le\lVert Z\rVert_2\lVert H_t-H_s\rVert_2, giving continuity of t↦E[ZHt]t\mapsto\mathbb{E}[ZH_t] (expectations are linear by Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral). Next, E[Z Sn(H)]=βˆ‘iE[ZHΟ„i](xiβˆ’xiβˆ’1)=Rn(E[ZHβ‹…])β†’βˆ«abE[ZHt] dt\mathbb{E}[Z\,S_n(H)]=\sum_i\mathbb{E}[ZH_{\tau_i}](x_i-x_{i-1})=R_n(\mathbb{E}[ZH_\cdot])\to\int_a^b\mathbb{E}[ZH_t]\,dt by the recorded fact, while

∣E[Z∫abHt dt]βˆ’E[Z Sn(H)]βˆ£β‰€βˆ₯Zβˆ₯2 βˆ₯∫abHt dtβˆ’Sn(H)βˆ₯2β†’0,\Bigl|\mathbb{E}\Bigl[Z\int_a^bH_t\,dt\Bigr]-\mathbb{E}[Z\,S_n(H)]\Bigr|\le\lVert Z\rVert_2\,\Bigl\lVert\int_a^bH_t\,dt-S_n(H)\Bigr\rVert_2\to0 ,

and uniqueness of real limits gives the first identity. With Z=1Z=1 (the constant random variable 11, square-integrable since E[12]=1\mathbb{E}[1^2]=1, and E[1β‹…Ht]=E[Ht]\mathbb{E}[1\cdot H_t]=\mathbb{E}[H_t]) this yields E[∫abHt dt]=∫abE[Ht] dt\mathbb{E}[\int_a^bH_t\,dt]=\int_a^b\mathbb{E}[H_t]\,dt and continuity of t↦E[Ht]t\mapsto\mathbb{E}[H_t]. For the covariance version, by Covariance of Square-Integrable Random Variables, Cov⁑(Z,X)=E[ZX]βˆ’E[Z]E[X]\operatorname{Cov}(Z,X)=\mathbb{E}[ZX]-\mathbb{E}[Z]\mathbb{E}[X]; hence t↦Cov⁑(Z,Ht)t\mapsto\operatorname{Cov}(Z,H_t) is continuous, and using the two identities just proved and linearity of the Riemann integral on continuous integrands,

Cov⁑(Z,∫abHt dt)=∫abE[ZHt] dtβˆ’E[Z]∫abE[Ht] dt=∫abCov⁑(Z,Ht) dt.\operatorname{Cov}\Bigl(Z,\int_a^bH_t\,dt\Bigr)=\int_a^b\mathbb{E}[ZH_t]\,dt-\mathbb{E}[Z]\int_a^b\mathbb{E}[H_t]\,dt=\int_a^b\operatorname{Cov}(Z,H_t)\,dt .

4. By the triangle inequality, βˆ₯Htβˆ₯2≀βˆ₯Htβˆ’Hsβˆ₯2+βˆ₯Hsβˆ₯2\lVert H_t\rVert_2\le\lVert H_t-H_s\rVert_2+\lVert H_s\rVert_2 and symmetrically, so ∣βˆ₯Htβˆ₯2βˆ’βˆ₯Hsβˆ₯2βˆ£β‰€βˆ₯Htβˆ’Hsβˆ₯2|\lVert H_t\rVert_2-\lVert H_s\rVert_2|\le\lVert H_t-H_s\rVert_2 and t↦βˆ₯Htβˆ₯2t\mapsto\lVert H_t\rVert_2 is continuous. Also βˆ₯Sn(H)βˆ₯2β‰€βˆ‘iβˆ₯HΟ„iβˆ₯2(xiβˆ’xiβˆ’1)=Rn(βˆ₯Hβ‹…βˆ₯2)β†’βˆ«abβˆ₯Htβˆ₯2 dt\lVert S_n(H)\rVert_2\le\sum_i\lVert H_{\tau_i}\rVert_2(x_i-x_{i-1})=R_n(\lVert H_\cdot\rVert_2)\to\int_a^b\lVert H_t\rVert_2\,dt by the recorded fact, and βˆ₯∫abHt dtβˆ₯2≀βˆ₯∫abHt dtβˆ’Sn(H)βˆ₯2+βˆ₯Sn(H)βˆ₯2\lVert\int_a^bH_t\,dt\rVert_2\le\lVert\int_a^bH_t\,dt-S_n(H)\rVert_2+\lVert S_n(H)\rVert_2; letting nβ†’βˆžn\to\infty gives the bound.

5. If r=ar=a or r=br=b the identity is the convention ∫ss=0\int_s^s=0 of Mean-Square Riemann Integral of a Family of Random Variables. Otherwise, for nβ‰₯1n\ge1 consider the tagged partition QnQ_n of [a,b][a,b] formed by the division points and tags of the two left-tagged uniform partitions of [a,r][a,r] and [r,b][r,b] with nn intervals each; its mesh is at most max⁑(rβˆ’a,bβˆ’r)/n\max(r-a,b-r)/n. The associated sum splits exactly as S(Qn)=Sn(H;[a,r])+Sn(H;[r,b])S(Q_n)=S_n(H;[a,r])+S_n(H;[r,b]), whose mean-square limit is ∫arHt dt+∫rbHt dt\int_a^rH_t\,dt+\int_r^bH_t\,dt by the triangle inequality. On the other hand, given Ξ΅>0\varepsilon>0, take Ξ΄>0\delta>0 from Mean-Square Riemann Integral of a Family of Random Variables for the integral over [a,b][a,b]; for all nn with max⁑(rβˆ’a,bβˆ’r)/n<Ξ΄\max(r-a,b-r)/n<\delta the sum S(Qn)S(Q_n) is within Ξ΅\varepsilon of ∫abHt dt\int_a^bH_t\,dt, so S(Qn)β†’βˆ«abHt dtS(Q_n)\to\int_a^bH_t\,dt in mean square. Uniqueness of mean-square limits concludes.

6. For s<ts<t, claim 4 applied to the restricted family on [s,t][s,t] gives βˆ₯∫stHu duβˆ₯2β‰€βˆ«stβˆ₯Huβˆ₯2 du\lVert\int_s^tH_u\,du\rVert_2\le\int_s^t\lVert H_u\rVert_2\,du; the second inequality holds since βˆ₯Huβˆ₯2≀M:=max⁑u∈[a,b]βˆ₯Huβˆ₯2\lVert H_u\rVert_2\le M:=\max_{u\in[a,b]}\lVert H_u\rVert_2 (the maximum exists by claim 4 and Extreme Value Theorem on a Compact Interval) and the Riemann integral is monotone on continuous integrands. For s=ts=t all quantities vanish by the degenerate-interval conventions. Mean-square continuity of the indefinite integral: let s≀ts\le t in [a,b][a,b]; if s=ts=t there is nothing to show, and the case t=at=a forces s=t=as=t=a. For a<ta<t and s<ts<t, applying claim 5 to the restricted family on [a,t][a,t] with intermediate point ss (the convention covering s=as=a) gives ∫atHu du=∫asHu du+∫stHu du\int_a^tH_u\,du=\int_a^sH_u\,du+\int_s^tH_u\,du almost surely, whence

βˆ₯∫atHu duβˆ’βˆ«asHu duβˆ₯2=βˆ₯∫stHu duβˆ₯2≀M (tβˆ’s),\Bigl\lVert\int_a^tH_u\,du-\int_a^sH_u\,du\Bigr\rVert_2=\Bigl\lVert\int_s^tH_u\,du\Bigr\rVert_2\le M\,(t-s),

which tends to 00 as tβˆ’sβ†’0t-s\to0; mean-square continuity follows. β– \blacksquare

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…