TheoremBase

Uniform continuity (Heine-Cantor) makes the oscillation of f on each piece of a fine uniform partition small, so the upper and lower sums differ by less than any given epsilon, and Riemann's criterion applies; subintervals follow by restriction.

Proof

Proof of (i). By The Real Line: Standing Notation and Background for Calculus on Intervals (x) (Extreme Value Theorem on a Closed Real Interval (i)) there is B∈RB\in\mathbb{R} with ∣f(t)βˆ£β‰€B|f(t)|\le B for every t∈[a,b]t\in[a,b], so ff is bounded and its upper sums and lower sums are defined. By The Real Line: Standing Notation and Background for Calculus on Intervals (x), [a,b][a,b] is compact (Closed Interval [a,b][a,b] is Compact in R\mathbb{R} (i)), so ff is uniformly continuous on [a,b][a,b] by Heine-Cantor Theorem: Continuity on a Compact Metric Space or a Compact Subset Implies Uniform Continuity (ii); in the form of The Real Line: Standing Notation and Background for Calculus on Intervals (vi): for every real Ξ·>0\eta>0 there is a real Ξ΄>0\delta>0 such that all s,t∈[a,b]s,t\in[a,b] with ∣sβˆ’t∣<Ξ΄|s-t|<\delta satisfy ∣f(s)βˆ’f(t)∣<Ξ·|f(s)-f(t)|<\eta.

Let Ξ΅>0\varepsilon>0 be real. We choose, in this order, Ξ·\eta, Ξ΄\delta, NN and a partition PP, and show U(f,P)βˆ’L(f,P)<Ξ΅U(f,P)-L(f,P)<\varepsilon. Put Ξ·=Ξ΅/(2(bβˆ’a))\eta=\varepsilon/(2(b-a)), which is positive as bβˆ’a>0b-a>0. Choose Ξ΄>0\delta>0 for this Ξ·\eta as above. By The Real Line: Standing Notation and Background for Calculus on Intervals (vii) (The Real Numbers, with the Natural Numbers, Integers and Rationals Identified with Subsets of the Reals, and Completeness (ix)) choose N∈NN\in\mathbb{N} with (bβˆ’a)/Ξ΄<N(b-a)/\delta<N. As 0<N0<N in R\mathbb{R} (Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares (vi)), 0<Nβˆ’10<N^{-1} by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field (viii). Multiplying (bβˆ’a)/Ξ΄<N(b-a)/\delta<N by Ξ΄>0\delta>0 gives bβˆ’a<NΞ΄b-a<N\delta, and multiplying this by Nβˆ’1N^{-1} gives h=(bβˆ’a)/N<Ξ΄h=(b-a)/N<\delta, both by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field (vi).

The uniform partition. Let P={a+(kβˆ’1)h:k∈[N+1]}P=\{a+(k-1)h:k\in[N+1]\}. By The Increasing Listing of a Partition: Endpoints, Lengths, Covering, Unions, Inserting a Point, Concatenation and Uniform Partitions (ix), PP is a partition of [a,b][a,b], the nn of The Increasing Listing of a Partition: Endpoints, Lengths, Covering, Unions, Inserting a Point, Concatenation and Uniform Partitions (i) for PP is NN, its increasing listing is x:[N+1]β†’Px:[N+1]\to P, k↦xk=a+(kβˆ’1)hk\mapsto x_{k}=a+(k-1)h, and xi+1βˆ’xi=hx_{i+1}-x_{i}=h for every i∈[N]i\in[N].

The oscillation on each subinterval. Let i∈[N]i\in[N] and s,t∈[xi,xi+1]s,t\in[x_{i},x_{i+1}]. Then sβˆ’t≀xi+1βˆ’xis-t\le x_{i+1}-x_{i} and βˆ’(xi+1βˆ’xi)≀sβˆ’t-(x_{i+1}-x_{i})\le s-t, by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field (iv) and Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field (v), so ∣sβˆ’tβˆ£β‰€xi+1βˆ’xi=h|s-t|\le x_{i+1}-x_{i}=h by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field (x), and ∣sβˆ’t∣<Ξ΄|s-t|<\delta by Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares (i). As xi,xi+1∈PβŠ†[a,b]x_{i},x_{i+1}\in P\subseteq[a,b] and [a,b][a,b] is an interval (Basic Facts about Intervals of the Real Line (v)), [xi,xi+1]βŠ†[a,b][x_{i},x_{i+1}]\subseteq[a,b] by Basic Facts about Intervals of the Real Line (ii); so s,t∈[a,b]s,t\in[a,b], and the choice of Ξ΄\delta gives ∣f(s)βˆ’f(t)∣<Ξ·|f(s)-f(t)|<\eta, in particular ∣f(s)βˆ’f(t)βˆ£β‰€Ξ·|f(s)-f(t)|\le\eta.

The criterion. As Ξ·β‰₯0\eta\ge0, Darboux Sums of Sums, Scalar Multiples and Dominated Functions, and the Oscillation Bound (iv) gives

U(f,P)βˆ’L(f,P)≀η (bβˆ’a)=Ξ΅/2<Ξ΅,U(f,P)-L(f,P)\le\eta\,(b-a)=\varepsilon/2<\varepsilon,

the last step by Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares (vii). As Ξ΅>0\varepsilon>0 was arbitrary, ff is integrable on [a,b][a,b] by Riemann's Criterion for Integrability, and the Integral Lies between Lower and Upper Sums (i).

Proof of (ii). Let u,v∈[a,b]u,v\in[a,b] with u<vu<v. Then [u,v]βŠ†[a,b][u,v]\subseteq[a,b] by Basic Facts about Intervals of the Real Line (v) and Basic Facts about Intervals of the Real Line (ii), and the restriction f∣[u,v]:[u,v]β†’Rf|_{[u,v]}:[u,v]\to\mathbb{R} is continuous on [u,v][u,v] by The Real Line: Standing Notation and Background for Calculus on Intervals (vi). By (i), applied to u<vu<v and f∣[u,v]f|_{[u,v]}, this restriction is bounded and integrable on [u,v][u,v]; by The Riemann Integral on a Closed Interval via Lower and Upper Integrals (vi) this says that ff is integrable on [u,v][u,v].

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…