Reason: Proof of lem:n-agent-martingale-stopped-covariation-2026a: the compensator is identified pathwise with a combination of consumed clock times (giving adaptedness and Lipschitz paths at every point), the martingale part is bounded everywhere and right-continuous on the regular event, the product minus the compensator is a bounded square-integrable martingale, and the stopped identities follow from optional stopping together with the stopped-integral lemma. Internally reviewed twice; validated strict.
Proof
Throughout, fix the solution and its derived objects as in the statement, write 1=1Ω0, and abbreviate the martingale decomposition theorem as the decomposition theorem and the existence theorem for the controlled N-agent dynamics as the existence theorem. Since P(Ω0)=1, expectations are unchanged when integrands are modified off Ω0; we use this silently. We record two remarks.
Bounded-integrability remark. A measurable real-valued function bounded in absolute value by a real c≥0 is integrable on a finite measure space. On a compact interval with the restricted Lebesgue measure: its square has integral at most that of the constant c2 by monotonicity of the nonnegative integral, the constant being integrable with finite integral by claim 3 of the integral toolkit (constants are continuous), so claim 4 of the toolkit with g=1 shows the absolute value has finite integral. On (Ω,F,P): a random variableX with ∣X∣≤c has ∫Ω∣X∣dP≤cP(Ω)=c<∞ by monotonicity, the nonnegative integral of the constant c being cP(Ω) directly from the definition (a simple function); hence X is integrable, and if ∣X∣≤c then X2 is a random variable bounded by c2, so X is also square-integrable.
Additivity remark. Let 0≤r≤t≤T and let u:[0,T]→R be measurable with respect to B[0,T], the trace Borel σ-algebra, and the Borel σ-algebra of the real line, with ∣u∣≤K for a real K≥0. Then
∫[0,t]u(s)ds=∫[0,r]u(s)ds+∫[r,t]u(s)ds.
The cases r=0 and r=t are trivial by the conventions ∫[0,0]⋅ds=0 and ∫[t,t]⋅ds=0, so let 0<r<t. Restrictions of u to compact subintervals are measurable (the preimage under a restriction is the intersection of the original preimage with the subinterval, and a trace of a trace is a trace) and bounded, hence integrable by the bounded-integrability remark. The zero extension to R of the restriction of u to [0,r] coincides with the zero extension of s↦u(s)1[0,r](s) on [0,t], where 1[0,r] is the indicator of [0,r]; so two applications of claim 2 of the integral toolkit give ∫[0,r]u=∫[0,t]u1[0,r], and likewise ∫[r,t]u=∫[0,t]u1[r,t]. Since 1[0,r]+1[r,t]=1+1{r} on [0,t], linearity gives ∫[0,r]u+∫[r,t]u=∫[0,t]u+∫[0,t]u1{r}, and the last integral vanishes by claim 1 of the null-set integral lemma: the integrand vanishes off {r}=[r,r], a null set by the interval-length property of Lebesgue measure.
Step 1 (product measurability and the two indefinite integrals). By parts (b) and (c) of the joint measurability lemma, the maps (s,ω)↦1Σsγ and (s,ω)↦1αsj are measurable with respect to the product σ-algebraB[0,T]⊗F. Fix a point (Σ∗,α∗) of Δl×A (A is nonempty) and define the modified map (s,ω)↦(Σs∘,αs∘) equal to (Σs,αs) on [0,T]×Ω0 and to (Σ∗,α∗) off it; each of its components, e.g. Σs∘γ=1Σsγ+(1−1)Σ∗γ, is product-measurable by measurability of sequentially continuous functions of measurable maps (sums and products with the product-measurable (s,ω)↦1(ω)). Each of the functions (Σ,α)↦bγ(Σ,α) and (Σ,α)↦Θγδ(Σ,α) is a finite sum of products of coordinate maps and members of the transition-rate family — by the formulas of the aggregate state drift and of the aggregate fluctuation covariance — hence sequentially continuous on Δl×A, by the joint continuity condition of the transition-rate family and the arithmetic of limits of real sequences. So the composition lemma applies to the componentwise product-measurable modified map and yields product-measurability of (s,ω)↦bγ(Σs∘,αs∘) and (s,ω)↦Θγδ(Σs∘,αs∘); multiplying by 1 — which changes nothing on [0,T]×Ω0 and makes all the maps vanish off it — shows that
(s,ω)↦1bγ(Σs,αs)and(s,ω)↦1Θγδ(Σs,αs)
are measurable with respect to B[0,T]⊗F and bounded in absolute value by 2(l−1)B everywhere (part (a) of the decomposition theorem, the bounds holding at every point of Ω).
Both maps are therefore progressively measurable with respect to the constant filtration (Ct)t∈[0,T], Ct=F — a filtration with time index restricted to [0,T]. Indeed the family of subsets of [0,T]×Ω whose intersection with [0,t]×Ω lies in B[0,t]⊗F is a σ-algebra containing every measurable rectangle A×E (as A∩[0,t]∈B[0,t], a trace of a trace being a trace), hence contains B[0,T]⊗F; so preimages under the restriction to [0,t]×Ω are measurable. By claim 4 of the progressive measurability toolkit, applied with the constant filtration and the bound 2(l−1)B: for every ω∈Ω and t∈[0,T] the integrals
are defined, and each of the two indefinite-integral families has increments bounded by 2(l−1)B(t−r) over 0≤r≤t≤T at every ω and has every path continuous on [0,T].
Off Ω0 both sides vanish. At any ω, N1∑iηsi,σ=Σsσ by the derived notation of the solution definition, so it suffices to check, for every (Σ,α)∈Δl×A,
(σ,γ′):σ=γ′∑wσγ′γδΣσβ(σ,γ′,Σ,α)=Θγδ(Σ,α).
For γ=δ: wσγ′γγ=(1{γ′=γ}−1{σ=γ})2 equals 1 exactly when exactly one of γ′=γ, σ=γ holds (both cannot hold, since σ=γ′) and 0 otherwise, so the left side is ∑σ=γΣσβ(σ,γ,Σ,α)+∑γ′=γΣγβ(γ,γ′,Σ,α), which is the diagonal entry Θγγ(Σ,α) of the aggregate fluctuation covariance after relabeling the second summation index. For γ=δ: wσγ′γδ=0 requires (γ′=γ or σ=γ) and (γ′=δ or σ=δ); since γ=δ and σ=γ′, the only such pairs are (σ,γ′)=(γ,δ), where wγδγδ=(0−1)(1−0)=−1, and (σ,γ′)=(δ,γ), where wδγγδ=(1−0)(0−1)=−1; the left side is −Σγβ(γ,δ,Σ,α)−Σδβ(δ,γ,Σ,α)=Θγδ(Σ,α), the off-diagonal formula.
For fixed ω, the sections in s of the finitely many maps (s,ω)↦1ηsi,σβ(σ,γ′,Σs,αs) are measurable on [0,t] with values in [0,B], and the integral over [0,t] of each section is the consumed clock time Tti,σγ′(ω): condition 2 of the solution definition defines the consumed clock times as exactly these Lebesgue integrals of sections (so the sections' measurability and the existence of the integrals at every ω are part of that definition), and the integrands take values in [0,B] by part (vii)(b) of the existence theorem. Integrating the pointwise identity above over [0,t] and using linearity (finitely many bounded measurable integrands, integrable by the bounded-integrability remark) yields, at every point of Ω and for every t∈(0,T],
Qtγδ=(σ,γ′):σ=γ′∑wσγ′γδN1i=1∑NTti,σγ′;
for t=0 both sides vanish, the left by the convention and the right because 0≤T0i,σγ′≤0 by part (vii)(b) of the existence theorem. This is the asserted representation.
Each Tti,σγ′ is Ftsys-measurable (part (iv) of the existence theorem: the consumed clock times are adapted), and a finite linear combination of measurable real-valued functions is measurable (the composition lemma, a linear function of finitely many real variables being sequentially continuous); so Qtγδ is Ftsys-measurable for every t, that is, Qγδ is adapted. By Step 1, ∣Qtγδ−Qrγδ∣≤2(l−1)B(t−r) at every ω and every path of Qγδ is continuous; with Q0γδ=0 this gives ∣Qtγδ∣≤2(l−1)BT everywhere. Every path is right-continuous in the sequential sense: for a sequence (sj) in [t,T] converging to t, ∣Qsjγδ−Qtγδ∣≤2(l−1)B(sj−t)→0. Hence the adapted family Qγδ is progressively measurable by claim 2 of the progressive measurability toolkit. This proves claim 1.
Step 3 (claim 2). At every point of Ω and for every u∈[0,T], Σu∈Δl by part (vii)(a) of the existence theorem, and the components of a point of the probability simplex are nonnegative with sum 1, hence lie in [0,1]. So ∣Σtγ−Σ0γ∣≤1 everywhere, and ∣∫[0,t]1bγ(Σs,αs)ds∣≤2(l−1)Bt by the increment bound of Step 1 (against r=0, the integral at 0 vanishing), giving ∣Mtγ∣≤1+2(l−1)BT=KM at every point of Ω.
Right-continuity. Fix ω∈Ω0 and t∈[0,T). By condition 1 of the solution definition, for each i the path u↦σui(ω) is constant on finitely many consecutive intervals covering [0,T], each of the form [a,c) except the last, of the form [a,T]. If t lies in a piece [a,c), put ηi=(c−t)/2>0, so that the path is constant on [t,t+ηi]⊆[a,c); if t lies in the final piece [a,T], put ηi=T−t>0, the path being constant on [t,T]. Let η=miniηi>0. Then for every s with t≤s≤min(t+η,T) and every i: σsi(ω)=σti(ω), hence ηsi,γ(ω)=ηti,γ(ω) for all γ and Σsγ(ω)=Σtγ(ω). In particular the path of Σγ is right-continuous at t in the ε-η sense, the increment being 0. For Mγ and such s,
by the increment bound of Step 1. Given ε>0, put η′=min(η,ε/(2(l−1)B+1))>0; then ∣Msγ(ω)−Mtγ(ω)∣≤ε whenever t≤s≤min(t+η′,T), which is right-continuity at t in the ε-η sense.
Progressive measurability. The set Ω∖Ω0 is an event of probability zero, and by the solution definition the system filtration contains every event of F of probability zero; hence Ω∖Ω0∈Ftsys and, by closure under complements, Ω0∈Ftsys for every t. Each Σtγ is Ftsys-measurable (part (iv) of the existence theorem), and each Mtγ is Ftsys-measurable (part (b) of the decomposition theorem: a square-integrable martingale is by definition adapted); products of measurable real-valued functions are measurable (the composition lemma), so the families 1Σγ and 1Mγ are adapted. Every path of each is right-continuous in the sequential sense: off Ω0 the paths are identically 0; on Ω0, at t=T every sequence in [T,T] is constant, and at t∈[0,T), for a sequence (sj) in [t,T] converging to t and any ε>0, eventually t≤sj≤min(t+η′,T) with the η′ of the ε-η property just proved, so the increments are eventually at most ε — that is, the path values converge. By claim 2 of the progressive measurability toolkit, 1Σγ and 1Mγ are progressively measurable. This proves claim 2.
Step 4 (claim 3). Each Ytγδ is Ftsys-measurable (products and linear combinations of the Ftsys-measurable functions Mtγ, Mtδ, Qtγδ, by the composition lemma), and at every point of Ω, using claims 1 and 2 and N≥1,
∣Ytγδ∣≤KM2+N12(l−1)BT≤KM2+2(l−1)BT=:KY.
By the bounded-integrability remark, each Ytγδ is square-integrable. Martingale property: fix 0≤r≤t≤T and D∈Frsys. At every ω, the additivity remark applied to the section s↦1(ω)Θγδ(Σs(ω),αs(ω)) — measurable on [0,T] at every ω and bounded by 2(l−1)B, by part (a) of the decomposition theorem — gives
Qtγδ−Qrγδ=∫[r,t]1Θγδ(Σs,αs)ds.
All products appearing below are integrable: they are bounded random variables (claims 1, 2, and the bounded-integrability remark). By linearity of the integral and part (c) of the decomposition theorem,
The family Yγδ is adapted with square-integrable entries and satisfies the averaged identity for all 0≤r≤t≤T and D∈Frsys, hence is a square-integrable martingale by the equivalence recorded in the definition of a square-integrable martingale (time index restricted to [0,T]).
Right-continuity on Ω0: fix ω∈Ω0, t∈[0,T), and ε>0. For t≤s≤T,
By claim 2, choose η1>0 so that both martingale increments are at most ε/(4KM+2) for t≤s≤min(t+η1,T), and put η2=ε/(4(l−1)B+2) and η=min(η1,η2); then for t≤s≤min(t+η,T) the right side is at most 2KMε/(4KM+2)+2(l−1)Bε/(4(l−1)B+2)≤ε/2+ε/2=ε. This proves claim 3.
Step 5 (claim 4). Let τ be a stopping time of (Ftsys)t∈[0,T] and fix 0≤r≤t≤T; the functions min(t,τ) and min(r,τ) are stopping times by claim 1 of the stopping-time toolkit (constants are stopping times, and the pointwise minimum of two stopping times is one).
Random variables and bounds. The filtration (Ftsys)t∈[0,T] (a filtration by the solution definition), the event Ω0 (with P(Ω0)=1), and each of the processes Mγ — a square-integrable martingale by part (b) of the decomposition theorem, bounded everywhere by KM and with paths right-continuous at every t∈[0,T) on Ω0 in the ε-η sense, by claim 2 — and Yγδ — the same with bound KY, by claim 3 — satisfy the hypotheses of the optional stopping theorem. By part (a) of that theorem applied with the stopping time min(t,τ), the functions 1Mmin(t,τ)γ and 1Ymin(t,τ)γδ are random variables bounded by KM and KY. Since Qγδ is progressively measurable (claim 1), the sampled function Qmin(t,τ)γδ is a random variable by claim 4(ii) of the stopping-time toolkit. Sampling is pointwise evaluation, so at every ω
whence 1Mmin(t,τ)γMmin(t,τ)δ=1Ymin(t,τ)γδ+N11Qmin(t,τ)γδ is a random variable; it is bounded by KM2, the product of two factors bounded by KM (claim 2).
For the integral: at every ω, the section s↦1(ω)Θγδ(Σs(ω),αs(ω)) is measurable on [0,T] and bounded by 2(l−1)B (part (a) of the decomposition theorem; off Ω0 it vanishes identically), so claim 2 of the stopped-time-integral lemma gives, for u∈{r,t} and at every ω,
and the additivity remark (applied at each ω to the measurable bounded section s↦1{s<τ}(ω)1(ω)Θγδ(Σs(ω),αs(ω)), a product of measurable functions by claim 1 of the stopped-time-integral lemma and the composition lemma) yields, at every ω,
The right side is a random variable, with absolute value at most 2(l−1)B(min(t,τ)−min(r,τ))≤2(l−1)B(t−r) by the increment bound of claim 1. This proves the measurability and boundedness assertions of claim 4.
Identities. Let D∈Frsys. Part (c) of the optional stopping theorem applied to Mγ, with the pair of times r≤t and the event D, states
E[1Mmin(t,τ)γ1D]=E[1Mmin(r,τ)γ1D],
the stopped family of the sampling definition having Muγ,τ=Mmin(u,τ)γ; this is the first identity. Applied to Yγδ it gives E[1Ymin(t,τ)γδ1D]=E[1Ymin(r,τ)γδ1D]. Substituting the pointwise decomposition of Ymin(u,τ)γδ displayed above for u=t and u=r, and rearranging by linearity (all terms bounded random variables, integrable by the bounded-integrability remark),
At every ω, 1(ω)(Qmin(t,τ)γδ(ω)−Qmin(r,τ)γδ(ω)) equals ∫[r,t]1{s<τ}1Θγδ(Σs,αs)ds: off Ω0 both sides vanish, the integrand carrying the factor 1(ω)=0, while on Ω0 this is the pathwise display above. Substituting gives the second identity. ■