TheoremBase

Proof of Stopped Covariation Identities for the Martingale Part of the Empirical State Measure

lemmalem:n-agent-martingale-stopped-covariation-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
Reason: Proof of lem:n-agent-martingale-stopped-covariation-2026a: the compensator is identified pathwise with a combination of consumed clock times (giving adaptedness and Lipschitz paths at every point), the martingale part is bounded everywhere and right-continuous on the regular event, the product minus the compensator is a bounded square-integrable martingale, and the stopped identities follow from optional stopping together with the stopped-integral lemma. Internally reviewed twice; validated strict.

Proof

Throughout, fix the solution and its derived objects as in the statement, write 1=1Ω0\mathbf{1}=\mathbf{1}_{\Omega_0}, and abbreviate the martingale decomposition theorem as the decomposition theorem and the existence theorem for the controlled NN-agent dynamics as the existence theorem. Since P(Ω0)=1P(\Omega_0)=1, expectations are unchanged when integrands are modified off Ω0\Omega_0; we use this silently. We record two remarks.

Bounded-integrability remark. A measurable real-valued function bounded in absolute value by a real c0c\ge0 is integrable on a finite measure space. On a compact interval with the restricted Lebesgue measure: its square has integral at most that of the constant c2c^2 by monotonicity of the nonnegative integral, the constant being integrable with finite integral by claim 3 of the integral toolkit (constants are continuous), so claim 4 of the toolkit with g=1g=1 shows the absolute value has finite integral. On (Ω,F,P)(\Omega,\mathcal{F},P): a random variable XX with Xc|X|\le c has ΩXdPcP(Ω)=c<\int_\Omega|X|\,dP\le c\,P(\Omega)=c<\infty by monotonicity, the nonnegative integral of the constant cc being cP(Ω)c\,P(\Omega) directly from the definition (a simple function); hence XX is integrable, and if Xc|X|\le c then X2X^2 is a random variable bounded by c2c^2, so XX is also square-integrable.

Additivity remark. Let 0rtT0\le r\le t\le T and let u:[0,T]Ru:[0,T]\to\mathbb{R} be measurable with respect to B[0,T]\mathcal{B}_{[0,T]}, the trace Borel σ\sigma-algebra, and the Borel σ\sigma-algebra of the real line, with uK|u|\le K for a real K0K\ge0. Then

[0,t]u(s)ds=[0,r]u(s)ds+[r,t]u(s)ds.\int_{[0,t]}u(s)\,ds=\int_{[0,r]}u(s)\,ds+\int_{[r,t]}u(s)\,ds .

The cases r=0r=0 and r=tr=t are trivial by the conventions [0,0]ds=0\int_{[0,0]}\cdot\,ds=0 and [t,t]ds=0\int_{[t,t]}\cdot\,ds=0, so let 0<r<t0<r<t. Restrictions of uu to compact subintervals are measurable (the preimage under a restriction is the intersection of the original preimage with the subinterval, and a trace of a trace is a trace) and bounded, hence integrable by the bounded-integrability remark. The zero extension to R\mathbb{R} of the restriction of uu to [0,r][0,r] coincides with the zero extension of su(s)1[0,r](s)s\mapsto u(s)\mathbf{1}_{[0,r]}(s) on [0,t][0,t], where 1[0,r]\mathbf{1}_{[0,r]} is the indicator of [0,r][0,r]; so two applications of claim 2 of the integral toolkit give [0,r]u=[0,t]u1[0,r]\int_{[0,r]}u=\int_{[0,t]}u\,\mathbf{1}_{[0,r]}, and likewise [r,t]u=[0,t]u1[r,t]\int_{[r,t]}u=\int_{[0,t]}u\,\mathbf{1}_{[r,t]}. Since 1[0,r]+1[r,t]=1+1{r}\mathbf{1}_{[0,r]}+\mathbf{1}_{[r,t]}=1+\mathbf{1}_{\{r\}} on [0,t][0,t], linearity gives [0,r]u+[r,t]u=[0,t]u+[0,t]u1{r}\int_{[0,r]}u+\int_{[r,t]}u=\int_{[0,t]}u+\int_{[0,t]}u\,\mathbf{1}_{\{r\}}, and the last integral vanishes by claim 1 of the null-set integral lemma: the integrand vanishes off {r}=[r,r]\{r\}=[r,r], a null set by the interval-length property of Lebesgue measure.

Step 1 (product measurability and the two indefinite integrals). By parts (b) and (c) of the joint measurability lemma, the maps (s,ω)1Σsγ(s,\omega)\mapsto\mathbf{1}\Sigma^\gamma_s and (s,ω)1αsj(s,\omega)\mapsto\mathbf{1}\alpha^j_s are measurable with respect to the product σ\sigma-algebra B[0,T]F\mathcal{B}_{[0,T]}\otimes\mathcal{F}. Fix a point (Σ,α)(\Sigma^*,\alpha^*) of Δl×A\Delta^l\times\mathcal{A} (A\mathcal{A} is nonempty) and define the modified map (s,ω)(Σs,αs)(s,\omega)\mapsto(\Sigma^\circ_s,\alpha^\circ_s) equal to (Σs,αs)(\Sigma_s,\alpha_s) on [0,T]×Ω0[0,T]\times\Omega_0 and to (Σ,α)(\Sigma^*,\alpha^*) off it; each of its components, e.g. Σsγ=1Σsγ+(11)Σγ\Sigma^{\circ\gamma}_s=\mathbf{1}\Sigma^\gamma_s+(1-\mathbf{1})\Sigma^{*\gamma}, is product-measurable by measurability of sequentially continuous functions of measurable maps (sums and products with the product-measurable (s,ω)1(ω)(s,\omega)\mapsto\mathbf{1}(\omega)). Each of the functions (Σ,α)bγ(Σ,α)(\Sigma,\alpha)\mapsto b^\gamma(\Sigma,\alpha) and (Σ,α)Θγδ(Σ,α)(\Sigma,\alpha)\mapsto\Theta^{\gamma\delta}(\Sigma,\alpha) is a finite sum of products of coordinate maps and members of the transition-rate family — by the formulas of the aggregate state drift and of the aggregate fluctuation covariance — hence sequentially continuous on Δl×A\Delta^l\times\mathcal{A}, by the joint continuity condition of the transition-rate family and the arithmetic of limits of real sequences. So the composition lemma applies to the componentwise product-measurable modified map and yields product-measurability of (s,ω)bγ(Σs,αs)(s,\omega)\mapsto b^\gamma(\Sigma^\circ_s,\alpha^\circ_s) and (s,ω)Θγδ(Σs,αs)(s,\omega)\mapsto\Theta^{\gamma\delta}(\Sigma^\circ_s,\alpha^\circ_s); multiplying by 1\mathbf{1} — which changes nothing on [0,T]×Ω0[0,T]\times\Omega_0 and makes all the maps vanish off it — shows that

(s,ω)1bγ(Σs,αs)and(s,ω)1Θγδ(Σs,αs)(s,\omega)\mapsto\mathbf{1}\,b^\gamma(\Sigma_s,\alpha_s)\qquad\text{and}\qquad(s,\omega)\mapsto\mathbf{1}\,\Theta^{\gamma\delta}(\Sigma_s,\alpha_s)

are measurable with respect to B[0,T]F\mathcal{B}_{[0,T]}\otimes\mathcal{F} and bounded in absolute value by 2(l1)B2(l-1)B everywhere (part (a) of the decomposition theorem, the bounds holding at every point of Ω\Omega).

Both maps are therefore progressively measurable with respect to the constant filtration (Ct)t[0,T](\mathcal{C}_t)_{t\in[0,T]}, Ct=F\mathcal{C}_t=\mathcal{F} — a filtration with time index restricted to [0,T][0,T]. Indeed the family of subsets of [0,T]×Ω[0,T]\times\Omega whose intersection with [0,t]×Ω[0,t]\times\Omega lies in B[0,t]F\mathcal{B}_{[0,t]}\otimes\mathcal{F} is a σ\sigma-algebra containing every measurable rectangle A×EA\times E (as A[0,t]B[0,t]A\cap[0,t]\in\mathcal{B}_{[0,t]}, a trace of a trace being a trace), hence contains B[0,T]F\mathcal{B}_{[0,T]}\otimes\mathcal{F}; so preimages under the restriction to [0,t]×Ω[0,t]\times\Omega are measurable. By claim 4 of the progressive measurability toolkit, applied with the constant filtration and the bound 2(l1)B2(l-1)B: for every ωΩ\omega\in\Omega and t[0,T]t\in[0,T] the integrals

[0,t]1bγ(Σs,αs)dsandQtγδ=[0,t]1Θγδ(Σs,αs)ds\int_{[0,t]}\mathbf{1}\,b^\gamma(\Sigma_s,\alpha_s)\,ds\qquad\text{and}\qquad \mathcal{Q}^{\gamma\delta}_t=\int_{[0,t]}\mathbf{1}\,\Theta^{\gamma\delta}(\Sigma_s,\alpha_s)\,ds

are defined, and each of the two indefinite-integral families has increments bounded by 2(l1)B(tr)2(l-1)B\,(t-r) over 0rtT0\le r\le t\le T at every ω\omega and has every path continuous on [0,T][0,T].

Step 2 (claim 1). At every (s,ω)[0,T]×Ω(s,\omega)\in[0,T]\times\Omega,

1Θγδ(Σs,αs)=(σ,γ):σγwσγγδ1Ni=1N1ηsi,σβ(σ,γ,Σs,αs),wσγγδ=(1{γ=γ}1{σ=γ})(1{γ=δ}1{σ=δ}).\mathbf{1}\,\Theta^{\gamma\delta}(\Sigma_s,\alpha_s)=\sum_{(\sigma,\gamma'):\,\sigma\neq\gamma'}w^{\gamma\delta}_{\sigma\gamma'}\,\frac{1}{N}\sum_{i=1}^{N}\mathbf{1}\,\eta^{i,\sigma}_s\,\beta(\sigma,\gamma',\Sigma_s,\alpha_s),\qquad w^{\gamma\delta}_{\sigma\gamma'}=\big(\mathbf{1}_{\{\gamma'=\gamma\}}-\mathbf{1}_{\{\sigma=\gamma\}}\big)\big(\mathbf{1}_{\{\gamma'=\delta\}}-\mathbf{1}_{\{\sigma=\delta\}}\big).

Off Ω0\Omega_0 both sides vanish. At any ω\omega, 1Niηsi,σ=Σsσ\frac{1}{N}\sum_i\eta^{i,\sigma}_s=\Sigma^\sigma_s by the derived notation of the solution definition, so it suffices to check, for every (Σ,α)Δl×A(\Sigma,\alpha)\in\Delta^l\times\mathcal{A},

(σ,γ):σγwσγγδΣσβ(σ,γ,Σ,α)=Θγδ(Σ,α).\sum_{(\sigma,\gamma'):\,\sigma\neq\gamma'}w^{\gamma\delta}_{\sigma\gamma'}\,\Sigma^\sigma\,\beta(\sigma,\gamma',\Sigma,\alpha)=\Theta^{\gamma\delta}(\Sigma,\alpha).

For γ=δ\gamma=\delta: wσγγγ=(1{γ=γ}1{σ=γ})2w^{\gamma\gamma}_{\sigma\gamma'}=(\mathbf{1}_{\{\gamma'=\gamma\}}-\mathbf{1}_{\{\sigma=\gamma\}})^2 equals 11 exactly when exactly one of γ=γ\gamma'=\gamma, σ=γ\sigma=\gamma holds (both cannot hold, since σγ\sigma\neq\gamma') and 00 otherwise, so the left side is σγΣσβ(σ,γ,Σ,α)+γγΣγβ(γ,γ,Σ,α)\sum_{\sigma\neq\gamma}\Sigma^\sigma\beta(\sigma,\gamma,\Sigma,\alpha)+\sum_{\gamma'\neq\gamma}\Sigma^\gamma\beta(\gamma,\gamma',\Sigma,\alpha), which is the diagonal entry Θγγ(Σ,α)\Theta^{\gamma\gamma}(\Sigma,\alpha) of the aggregate fluctuation covariance after relabeling the second summation index. For γδ\gamma\neq\delta: wσγγδ0w^{\gamma\delta}_{\sigma\gamma'}\neq0 requires (γ=γ\gamma'=\gamma or σ=γ\sigma=\gamma) and (γ=δ\gamma'=\delta or σ=δ\sigma=\delta); since γδ\gamma\neq\delta and σγ\sigma\neq\gamma', the only such pairs are (σ,γ)=(γ,δ)(\sigma,\gamma')=(\gamma,\delta), where wγδγδ=(01)(10)=1w^{\gamma\delta}_{\gamma\delta}=(0-1)(1-0)=-1, and (σ,γ)=(δ,γ)(\sigma,\gamma')=(\delta,\gamma), where wδγγδ=(10)(01)=1w^{\gamma\delta}_{\delta\gamma}=(1-0)(0-1)=-1; the left side is Σγβ(γ,δ,Σ,α)Σδβ(δ,γ,Σ,α)=Θγδ(Σ,α)-\Sigma^\gamma\beta(\gamma,\delta,\Sigma,\alpha)-\Sigma^\delta\beta(\delta,\gamma,\Sigma,\alpha)=\Theta^{\gamma\delta}(\Sigma,\alpha), the off-diagonal formula.

For fixed ω\omega, the sections in ss of the finitely many maps (s,ω)1ηsi,σβ(σ,γ,Σs,αs)(s,\omega)\mapsto\mathbf{1}\eta^{i,\sigma}_s\beta(\sigma,\gamma',\Sigma_s,\alpha_s) are measurable on [0,t][0,t] with values in [0,B][0,B], and the integral over [0,t][0,t] of each section is the consumed clock time Tti,σγ(ω)\mathcal{T}^{i,\sigma\gamma'}_t(\omega): condition 2 of the solution definition defines the consumed clock times as exactly these Lebesgue integrals of sections (so the sections' measurability and the existence of the integrals at every ω\omega are part of that definition), and the integrands take values in [0,B][0,B] by part (vii)(b) of the existence theorem. Integrating the pointwise identity above over [0,t][0,t] and using linearity (finitely many bounded measurable integrands, integrable by the bounded-integrability remark) yields, at every point of Ω\Omega and for every t(0,T]t\in(0,T],

Qtγδ=(σ,γ):σγwσγγδ1Ni=1NTti,σγ;\mathcal{Q}^{\gamma\delta}_t=\sum_{(\sigma,\gamma'):\,\sigma\neq\gamma'}w^{\gamma\delta}_{\sigma\gamma'}\,\frac{1}{N}\sum_{i=1}^{N}\mathcal{T}^{i,\sigma\gamma'}_t ;

for t=0t=0 both sides vanish, the left by the convention and the right because 0T0i,σγ00\le\mathcal{T}^{i,\sigma\gamma'}_0\le0 by part (vii)(b) of the existence theorem. This is the asserted representation.

Each Tti,σγ\mathcal{T}^{i,\sigma\gamma'}_t is Ftsys\mathcal{F}^{\mathrm{sys}}_t-measurable (part (iv) of the existence theorem: the consumed clock times are adapted), and a finite linear combination of measurable real-valued functions is measurable (the composition lemma, a linear function of finitely many real variables being sequentially continuous); so Qtγδ\mathcal{Q}^{\gamma\delta}_t is Ftsys\mathcal{F}^{\mathrm{sys}}_t-measurable for every tt, that is, Qγδ\mathcal{Q}^{\gamma\delta} is adapted. By Step 1, QtγδQrγδ2(l1)B(tr)|\mathcal{Q}^{\gamma\delta}_t-\mathcal{Q}^{\gamma\delta}_r|\le2(l-1)B(t-r) at every ω\omega and every path of Qγδ\mathcal{Q}^{\gamma\delta} is continuous; with Q0γδ=0\mathcal{Q}^{\gamma\delta}_0=0 this gives Qtγδ2(l1)BT|\mathcal{Q}^{\gamma\delta}_t|\le2(l-1)BT everywhere. Every path is right-continuous in the sequential sense: for a sequence (sj)(s_j) in [t,T][t,T] converging to tt, QsjγδQtγδ2(l1)B(sjt)0|\mathcal{Q}^{\gamma\delta}_{s_j}-\mathcal{Q}^{\gamma\delta}_t|\le2(l-1)B(s_j-t)\to0. Hence the adapted family Qγδ\mathcal{Q}^{\gamma\delta} is progressively measurable by claim 2 of the progressive measurability toolkit. This proves claim 1.

Step 3 (claim 2). At every point of Ω\Omega and for every u[0,T]u\in[0,T], ΣuΔl\Sigma_u\in\Delta^l by part (vii)(a) of the existence theorem, and the components of a point of the probability simplex are nonnegative with sum 11, hence lie in [0,1][0,1]. So ΣtγΣ0γ1|\Sigma^\gamma_t-\Sigma^\gamma_0|\le1 everywhere, and [0,t]1bγ(Σs,αs)ds2(l1)Bt|\int_{[0,t]}\mathbf{1}b^\gamma(\Sigma_s,\alpha_s)ds|\le2(l-1)Bt by the increment bound of Step 1 (against r=0r=0, the integral at 00 vanishing), giving Mtγ1+2(l1)BT=KM|M^\gamma_t|\le1+2(l-1)BT=K_M at every point of Ω\Omega.

Right-continuity. Fix ωΩ0\omega\in\Omega_0 and t[0,T)t\in[0,T). By condition 1 of the solution definition, for each ii the path uσui(ω)u\mapsto\sigma^i_u(\omega) is constant on finitely many consecutive intervals covering [0,T][0,T], each of the form [a,c)[a,c) except the last, of the form [a,T][a,T]. If tt lies in a piece [a,c)[a,c), put ηi=(ct)/2>0\eta_i=(c-t)/2>0, so that the path is constant on [t,t+ηi][a,c)[t,t+\eta_i]\subseteq[a,c); if tt lies in the final piece [a,T][a,T], put ηi=Tt>0\eta_i=T-t>0, the path being constant on [t,T][t,T]. Let η=miniηi>0\eta=\min_i\eta_i>0. Then for every ss with tsmin(t+η,T)t\le s\le\min(t+\eta,T) and every ii: σsi(ω)=σti(ω)\sigma^i_s(\omega)=\sigma^i_t(\omega), hence ηsi,γ(ω)=ηti,γ(ω)\eta^{i,\gamma}_s(\omega)=\eta^{i,\gamma}_t(\omega) for all γ\gamma and Σsγ(ω)=Σtγ(ω)\Sigma^\gamma_s(\omega)=\Sigma^\gamma_t(\omega). In particular the path of Σγ\Sigma^\gamma is right-continuous at tt in the ε\varepsilon-η\eta sense, the increment being 00. For MγM^\gamma and such ss,

Msγ(ω)Mtγ(ω)=[0,s]1bγ(Σu,αu)du[0,t]1bγ(Σu,αu)du2(l1)B(st)|M^\gamma_s(\omega)-M^\gamma_t(\omega)|=\Big|\int_{[0,s]}\mathbf{1}\,b^\gamma(\Sigma_u,\alpha_u)\,du-\int_{[0,t]}\mathbf{1}\,b^\gamma(\Sigma_u,\alpha_u)\,du\Big|\le2(l-1)B\,(s-t)

by the increment bound of Step 1. Given ε>0\varepsilon>0, put η=min(η, ε/(2(l1)B+1))>0\eta'=\min\big(\eta,\ \varepsilon/(2(l-1)B+1)\big)>0; then Msγ(ω)Mtγ(ω)ε|M^\gamma_s(\omega)-M^\gamma_t(\omega)|\le\varepsilon whenever tsmin(t+η,T)t\le s\le\min(t+\eta',T), which is right-continuity at tt in the ε\varepsilon-η\eta sense.

Progressive measurability. The set ΩΩ0\Omega\setminus\Omega_0 is an event of probability zero, and by the solution definition the system filtration contains every event of F\mathcal{F} of probability zero; hence ΩΩ0Ftsys\Omega\setminus\Omega_0\in\mathcal{F}^{\mathrm{sys}}_t and, by closure under complements, Ω0Ftsys\Omega_0\in\mathcal{F}^{\mathrm{sys}}_t for every tt. Each Σtγ\Sigma^\gamma_t is Ftsys\mathcal{F}^{\mathrm{sys}}_t-measurable (part (iv) of the existence theorem), and each MtγM^\gamma_t is Ftsys\mathcal{F}^{\mathrm{sys}}_t-measurable (part (b) of the decomposition theorem: a square-integrable martingale is by definition adapted); products of measurable real-valued functions are measurable (the composition lemma), so the families 1Σγ\mathbf{1}\Sigma^\gamma and 1Mγ\mathbf{1}M^\gamma are adapted. Every path of each is right-continuous in the sequential sense: off Ω0\Omega_0 the paths are identically 00; on Ω0\Omega_0, at t=Tt=T every sequence in [T,T][T,T] is constant, and at t[0,T)t\in[0,T), for a sequence (sj)(s_j) in [t,T][t,T] converging to tt and any ε>0\varepsilon>0, eventually tsjmin(t+η,T)t\le s_j\le\min(t+\eta',T) with the η\eta' of the ε\varepsilon-η\eta property just proved, so the increments are eventually at most ε\varepsilon — that is, the path values converge. By claim 2 of the progressive measurability toolkit, 1Σγ\mathbf{1}\Sigma^\gamma and 1Mγ\mathbf{1}M^\gamma are progressively measurable. This proves claim 2.

Step 4 (claim 3). Each YtγδY^{\gamma\delta}_t is Ftsys\mathcal{F}^{\mathrm{sys}}_t-measurable (products and linear combinations of the Ftsys\mathcal{F}^{\mathrm{sys}}_t-measurable functions MtγM^\gamma_t, MtδM^\delta_t, Qtγδ\mathcal{Q}^{\gamma\delta}_t, by the composition lemma), and at every point of Ω\Omega, using claims 1 and 2 and N1N\ge1,

YtγδKM2+1N2(l1)BTKM2+2(l1)BT=:KY.|Y^{\gamma\delta}_t|\le K_M^2+\tfrac{1}{N}\,2(l-1)BT\le K_M^2+2(l-1)BT=:K_Y .

By the bounded-integrability remark, each YtγδY^{\gamma\delta}_t is square-integrable. Martingale property: fix 0rtT0\le r\le t\le T and DFrsysD\in\mathcal{F}^{\mathrm{sys}}_r. At every ω\omega, the additivity remark applied to the section s1(ω)Θγδ(Σs(ω),αs(ω))s\mapsto\mathbf{1}(\omega)\Theta^{\gamma\delta}(\Sigma_s(\omega),\alpha_s(\omega)) — measurable on [0,T][0,T] at every ω\omega and bounded by 2(l1)B2(l-1)B, by part (a) of the decomposition theorem — gives

QtγδQrγδ=[r,t]1Θγδ(Σs,αs)ds.\mathcal{Q}^{\gamma\delta}_t-\mathcal{Q}^{\gamma\delta}_r=\int_{[r,t]}\mathbf{1}\,\Theta^{\gamma\delta}(\Sigma_s,\alpha_s)\,ds .

All products appearing below are integrable: they are bounded random variables (claims 1, 2, and the bounded-integrability remark). By linearity of the integral and part (c) of the decomposition theorem,

E[Ytγδ1D]E[Yrγδ1D]=1NE[1D[r,t]1Θγδ(Σs,αs)ds]1NE[1D(QtγδQrγδ)]=0.\mathbb{E}\big[Y^{\gamma\delta}_t\mathbf{1}_D\big]-\mathbb{E}\big[Y^{\gamma\delta}_r\mathbf{1}_D\big]=\frac{1}{N}\,\mathbb{E}\Big[\mathbf{1}_D\int_{[r,t]}\mathbf{1}\Theta^{\gamma\delta}(\Sigma_s,\alpha_s)\,ds\Big]-\frac{1}{N}\,\mathbb{E}\big[\mathbf{1}_D\,\big(\mathcal{Q}^{\gamma\delta}_t-\mathcal{Q}^{\gamma\delta}_r\big)\big]=0 .

The family YγδY^{\gamma\delta} is adapted with square-integrable entries and satisfies the averaged identity for all 0rtT0\le r\le t\le T and DFrsysD\in\mathcal{F}^{\mathrm{sys}}_r, hence is a square-integrable martingale by the equivalence recorded in the definition of a square-integrable martingale (time index restricted to [0,T][0,T]).

Right-continuity on Ω0\Omega_0: fix ωΩ0\omega\in\Omega_0, t[0,T)t\in[0,T), and ε>0\varepsilon>0. For tsTt\le s\le T,

YsγδYtγδMsγMsδMtδ+MtδMsγMtγ+1NQsγδQtγδKM(MsδMtδ+MsγMtγ)+2(l1)B(st).|Y^{\gamma\delta}_s-Y^{\gamma\delta}_t|\le|M^\gamma_s|\,|M^\delta_s-M^\delta_t|+|M^\delta_t|\,|M^\gamma_s-M^\gamma_t|+\tfrac{1}{N}|\mathcal{Q}^{\gamma\delta}_s-\mathcal{Q}^{\gamma\delta}_t|\le K_M\big(|M^\delta_s-M^\delta_t|+|M^\gamma_s-M^\gamma_t|\big)+2(l-1)B\,(s-t).

By claim 2, choose η1>0\eta_1>0 so that both martingale increments are at most ε/(4KM+2)\varepsilon/(4K_M+2) for tsmin(t+η1,T)t\le s\le\min(t+\eta_1,T), and put η2=ε/(4(l1)B+2)\eta_2=\varepsilon/(4(l-1)B+2) and η=min(η1,η2)\eta=\min(\eta_1,\eta_2); then for tsmin(t+η,T)t\le s\le\min(t+\eta,T) the right side is at most 2KMε/(4KM+2)+2(l1)Bε/(4(l1)B+2)ε/2+ε/2=ε2K_M\,\varepsilon/(4K_M+2)+2(l-1)B\,\varepsilon/(4(l-1)B+2)\le\varepsilon/2+\varepsilon/2=\varepsilon. This proves claim 3.

Step 5 (claim 4). Let τ\tau be a stopping time of (Ftsys)t[0,T](\mathcal{F}^{\mathrm{sys}}_t)_{t\in[0,T]} and fix 0rtT0\le r\le t\le T; the functions min(t,τ)\min(t,\tau) and min(r,τ)\min(r,\tau) are stopping times by claim 1 of the stopping-time toolkit (constants are stopping times, and the pointwise minimum of two stopping times is one).

Random variables and bounds. The filtration (Ftsys)t[0,T](\mathcal{F}^{\mathrm{sys}}_t)_{t\in[0,T]} (a filtration by the solution definition), the event Ω0\Omega_0 (with P(Ω0)=1P(\Omega_0)=1), and each of the processes MγM^\gamma — a square-integrable martingale by part (b) of the decomposition theorem, bounded everywhere by KMK_M and with paths right-continuous at every t[0,T)t\in[0,T) on Ω0\Omega_0 in the ε\varepsilon-η\eta sense, by claim 2 — and YγδY^{\gamma\delta} — the same with bound KYK_Y, by claim 3 — satisfy the hypotheses of the optional stopping theorem. By part (a) of that theorem applied with the stopping time min(t,τ)\min(t,\tau), the functions 1Mmin(t,τ)γ\mathbf{1}M^\gamma_{\min(t,\tau)} and 1Ymin(t,τ)γδ\mathbf{1}Y^{\gamma\delta}_{\min(t,\tau)} are random variables bounded by KMK_M and KYK_Y. Since Qγδ\mathcal{Q}^{\gamma\delta} is progressively measurable (claim 1), the sampled function Qmin(t,τ)γδ\mathcal{Q}^{\gamma\delta}_{\min(t,\tau)} is a random variable by claim 4(ii) of the stopping-time toolkit. Sampling is pointwise evaluation, so at every ω\omega

Ymin(t,τ)γδ=Mmin(t,τ)γMmin(t,τ)δ1NQmin(t,τ)γδ,Y^{\gamma\delta}_{\min(t,\tau)}=M^\gamma_{\min(t,\tau)}M^\delta_{\min(t,\tau)}-\tfrac{1}{N}\,\mathcal{Q}^{\gamma\delta}_{\min(t,\tau)},

whence 1Mmin(t,τ)γMmin(t,τ)δ=1Ymin(t,τ)γδ+1N1Qmin(t,τ)γδ\mathbf{1}\,M^\gamma_{\min(t,\tau)}M^\delta_{\min(t,\tau)}=\mathbf{1}Y^{\gamma\delta}_{\min(t,\tau)}+\tfrac1N\mathbf{1}\mathcal{Q}^{\gamma\delta}_{\min(t,\tau)} is a random variable; it is bounded by KM2K_M^2, the product of two factors bounded by KMK_M (claim 2).

For the integral: at every ω\omega, the section s1(ω)Θγδ(Σs(ω),αs(ω))s\mapsto\mathbf{1}(\omega)\,\Theta^{\gamma\delta}(\Sigma_s(\omega),\alpha_s(\omega)) is measurable on [0,T][0,T] and bounded by 2(l1)B2(l-1)B (part (a) of the decomposition theorem; off Ω0\Omega_0 it vanishes identically), so claim 2 of the stopped-time-integral lemma gives, for u{r,t}u\in\{r,t\} and at every ω\omega,

Qmin(u,τ(ω))γδ(ω)=[0,u]1{s<τ}(ω)1(ω)Θγδ(Σs(ω),αs(ω))ds,\mathcal{Q}^{\gamma\delta}_{\min(u,\tau(\omega))}(\omega)=\int_{[0,u]}\mathbf{1}_{\{s<\tau\}}(\omega)\,\mathbf{1}(\omega)\,\Theta^{\gamma\delta}(\Sigma_s(\omega),\alpha_s(\omega))\,ds,

and the additivity remark (applied at each ω\omega to the measurable bounded section s1{s<τ}(ω)1(ω)Θγδ(Σs(ω),αs(ω))s\mapsto\mathbf{1}_{\{s<\tau\}}(\omega)\mathbf{1}(\omega)\Theta^{\gamma\delta}(\Sigma_s(\omega),\alpha_s(\omega)), a product of measurable functions by claim 1 of the stopped-time-integral lemma and the composition lemma) yields, at every ω\omega,

[r,t]1{s<τ}1Θγδ(Σs,αs)ds=Qmin(t,τ)γδQmin(r,τ)γδ.\int_{[r,t]}\mathbf{1}_{\{s<\tau\}}\,\mathbf{1}\,\Theta^{\gamma\delta}(\Sigma_s,\alpha_s)\,ds=\mathcal{Q}^{\gamma\delta}_{\min(t,\tau)}-\mathcal{Q}^{\gamma\delta}_{\min(r,\tau)} .

The right side is a random variable, with absolute value at most 2(l1)B(min(t,τ)min(r,τ))2(l1)B(tr)2(l-1)B\,\big(\min(t,\tau)-\min(r,\tau)\big)\le2(l-1)B\,(t-r) by the increment bound of claim 1. This proves the measurability and boundedness assertions of claim 4.

Identities. Let DFrsysD\in\mathcal{F}^{\mathrm{sys}}_r. Part (c) of the optional stopping theorem applied to MγM^\gamma, with the pair of times rtr\le t and the event DD, states

E[1Mmin(t,τ)γ1D]=E[1Mmin(r,τ)γ1D],\mathbb{E}\big[\mathbf{1}\,M^\gamma_{\min(t,\tau)}\,\mathbf{1}_D\big]=\mathbb{E}\big[\mathbf{1}\,M^\gamma_{\min(r,\tau)}\,\mathbf{1}_D\big],

the stopped family of the sampling definition having Muγ,τ=Mmin(u,τ)γM^{\gamma,\tau}_u=M^\gamma_{\min(u,\tau)}; this is the first identity. Applied to YγδY^{\gamma\delta} it gives E[1Ymin(t,τ)γδ1D]=E[1Ymin(r,τ)γδ1D]\mathbb{E}[\mathbf{1}Y^{\gamma\delta}_{\min(t,\tau)}\mathbf{1}_D]=\mathbb{E}[\mathbf{1}Y^{\gamma\delta}_{\min(r,\tau)}\mathbf{1}_D]. Substituting the pointwise decomposition of Ymin(u,τ)γδY^{\gamma\delta}_{\min(u,\tau)} displayed above for u=tu=t and u=ru=r, and rearranging by linearity (all terms bounded random variables, integrable by the bounded-integrability remark),

E[1Mmin(t,τ)γMmin(t,τ)δ1D]E[1Mmin(r,τ)γMmin(r,τ)δ1D]=1NE[1(Qmin(t,τ)γδQmin(r,τ)γδ)1D].\mathbb{E}\big[\mathbf{1}\,M^\gamma_{\min(t,\tau)}M^\delta_{\min(t,\tau)}\,\mathbf{1}_D\big]-\mathbb{E}\big[\mathbf{1}\,M^\gamma_{\min(r,\tau)}M^\delta_{\min(r,\tau)}\,\mathbf{1}_D\big]=\frac{1}{N}\,\mathbb{E}\big[\mathbf{1}\,\big(\mathcal{Q}^{\gamma\delta}_{\min(t,\tau)}-\mathcal{Q}^{\gamma\delta}_{\min(r,\tau)}\big)\,\mathbf{1}_D\big].

At every ω\omega, 1(ω)(Qmin(t,τ)γδ(ω)Qmin(r,τ)γδ(ω))\mathbf{1}(\omega)\big(\mathcal{Q}^{\gamma\delta}_{\min(t,\tau)}(\omega)-\mathcal{Q}^{\gamma\delta}_{\min(r,\tau)}(\omega)\big) equals [r,t]1{s<τ}1Θγδ(Σs,αs)ds\int_{[r,t]}\mathbf{1}_{\{s<\tau\}}\mathbf{1}\Theta^{\gamma\delta}(\Sigma_s,\alpha_s)\,ds: off Ω0\Omega_0 both sides vanish, the integrand carrying the factor 1(ω)=0\mathbf{1}(\omega)=0, while on Ω0\Omega_0 this is the pathwise display above. Substituting gives the second identity. \blacksquare

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Comments

Loading…