TheoremBase

Proof of Gaussian Smoothing of a Measure with Finite Second Moment: Positive Density, Finite Entropy, a Tangent Score, Non-Increasing Fisher Information and Exponential Integrability

lemmalem:gaussian-smoothing-entropy-score-euclidean-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 11,583 chars · 31 deps · depth 30 Reason: E2 Stage 1: proof of the Gaussian smoothing lemma.

The smoothed measure is the law of X+Z with Z Gaussian and independent, which gives the representation formula, the coupling bound and the moments. Two-sided Gaussian bounds on the density give finite entropy. Cauchy–Schwarz bounds the logarithmic gradient, and the Hessian of |y|^2/2 + s log rho is a conditional covariance, so that function is convex and the score is tangent. Moving derivatives through the smoothing bounds the score's pairing by the original Fisher information, and a Gaussian moment bound gives exponential integrability.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. Let csc_{s} be the constant with gs(z)=csexp(z2/(2s))g_{s}(z)=c_{s}\exp(-\lVert z\rVert^{2}/(2s)) of The Gaussian Kernels on Euclidean Space: Scaling, Derivatives up to Order Three, the Convolution Identity, Moments and Tails, and let γs\gamma_{s} be the measure with density gsg_{s} with respect to λd\lambda_{d} (Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables), a probability measure since gsdλd=1\int g_{s}\,d\lambda_{d}=1. Integrals against a measure with a density are computed by claim 3 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables; integrals over product measures by Tonelli and Fubini Theorems, the integrands below being Borel as compositions of continuous or Borel maps (Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §borel-maps).

Step 0 (representation). Let h:Rd[0,]h:\mathbb{R}^{d}\to[0,\infty] be Borel. Then

hdμs=(h(y)gs(yx)dy)μ(dx)=(h(x+z)γs(dz))μ(dx).(R)\int h\,d\mu_{s}=\int\Bigl(\int h(y)g_{s}(y-x)\,dy\Bigr)\mu(dx)=\int\Bigl(\int h(x+z)\,\gamma_{s}(dz)\Bigr)\mu(dx).\tag{R}

The first equality is claim 3 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables together with ρs(y)=gs(yx)μ(dx)\rho_{s}(y)=\int g_{s}(y-x)\mu(dx) and Tonelli; the second is translation invariance of λd\lambda_{d} (claim 2 of Translation and Reflection Invariance of Lebesgue Measure on Rn\mathbb{R}^n). By linearity (R) extends to Borel hh for which either side is finite with h|h| in place of hh. Moreover, for bounded Borel ϕ\phi, Gaussian Smoothing of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space: Regularity, Mass, Duality, Approximation of a Bounded Function with a Modulus of Continuity, and the Pairing Identity §duality gives ϕdμs=(gsϕ)dμ\int\phi\,d\mu_{s}=\int(g_{s}*\phi)\,d\mu, and by translation and reflection invariance (claim 3 of Translation and Reflection Invariance of Lebesgue Measure on Rn\mathbb{R}^n) and the evenness of gsg_{s} (The Gaussian Kernels on Euclidean Space: Scaling, Derivatives up to Order Three, the Convolution Identity, Moments and Tails §derivatives), (gsϕ)(x)=ϕ(xz)γs(dz)=(ϕγs)(x)(g_{s}*\phi)(x)=\int\phi(x-z)\gamma_{s}(dz)=(\phi*\gamma_{s})(x), in the notation of The Convolution of a Bounded Continuous Function with a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space: Continuity, Boundedness and Differentiation Under the Integral §continuous.

Claim 1. By Gaussian Smoothing of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space: Regularity, Mass, Duality, Approximation of a Bounded Function with a Modulus of Continuity, and the Pairing Identity §regularity, ρs\rho_{s} is of class C3C^{3}, hence of class C2C^{2} (C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set), with

iρs(y)=1s(yixi)gs(yx)μ(dx),jiρs(y)=((yixi)(yjxj)s2δijs)gs(yx)μ(dx)(2)\partial_{i}\rho_{s}(y)=-\frac1s\int(y_{i}-x_{i})g_{s}(y-x)\mu(dx),\qquad\partial_{j}\partial_{i}\rho_{s}(y)=\int\Bigl(\frac{(y_{i}-x_{i})(y_{j}-x_{j})}{s^{2}}-\frac{\delta_{ij}}{s}\Bigr)g_{s}(y-x)\mu(dx)\tag{2}

by The Gaussian Kernels on Euclidean Space: Scaling, Derivatives up to Order Three, the Convolution Identity, Moments and Tails §derivatives. Positivity. Let R0=2M2(μ)+1R_{0}=\sqrt{2M_{2}(\mu)}+1. Markov's inequality (The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §markov, applied to x2\lVert x\rVert^{2} at the level R02R_{0}^{2}) gives μ({R02x2})M2(μ)R0212\mu(\{R_{0}^{2}\le\lVert x\rVert^{2}\})\le M_{2}(\mu)R_{0}^{-2}\le\tfrac12, so the ball Bˉ0=Bˉ(0Rd,R0)\bar{B}_{0}=\bar{B}(0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}},R_{0}) has μ(Bˉ0)12\mu(\bar{B}_{0})\ge\tfrac12. For xBˉ0x\in\bar{B}_{0}, yx2(y+R0)22y2+2R02\lVert y-x\rVert^{2}\le(\lVert y\rVert+R_{0})^{2}\le2\lVert y\rVert^{2}+2R_{0}^{2}, and exp\exp is increasing (claim 4 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function), so

ρs(y)1Bˉ0(x)gs(yx)μ(dx)12csexp(s1(y2+R02))>0.(3)\rho_{s}(y)\ge\int\mathbf{1}_{\bar{B}_{0}}(x)g_{s}(y-x)\mu(dx)\ge\tfrac12c_{s}\exp\bigl(-s^{-1}(\lVert y\rVert^{2}+R_{0}^{2})\bigr)>0.\tag{3}

Moments and distance. By (R) with h=2h=\lVert\cdot\rVert^{2}, x+z22x2+2z2\lVert x+z\rVert^{2}\le2\lVert x\rVert^{2}+2\lVert z\rVert^{2} (Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §functions) and z2γs(dz)=ds\int\lVert z\rVert^{2}\gamma_{s}(dz)=ds (The Gaussian Kernels on Euclidean Space: Scaling, Derivatives up to Order Three, the Convolution Identity, Moments and Tails §moments), M2(μs)2M2(μ)+2ds<M_{2}(\mu_{s})\le2M_{2}(\mu)+2ds<\infty, so μsP2(Rd)\mu_{s}\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}). Let F:Rd+dRd+dF:\mathbb{R}^{d+d}\to\mathbb{R}^{d+d} be F(x,z)=(x+z,x)F(x,z)=(x+z,x), which is continuous, hence Borel, and let π=F#(μγs)\pi=F_{\#}(\mu\boxtimes\gamma_{s}), with the product of Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §pairs. By the change of variables for push-forwards (Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §pushforward), Tonelli and (R), the first marginal of π\pi is μs\mu_{s} and the second is μ\mu. So π\pi is a coupling of μs\mu_{s} and μ\mu, with cost (x+z)x2d(μγs)=ds\int\lVert(x+z)-x\rVert^{2}\,d(\mu\boxtimes\gamma_{s})=ds. Hence W2(μs,μ)2dsW_{2}(\mu_{s},\mu)^{2}\le ds by the definition of W2W_{2} as an infimum over couplings (The Wasserstein Space and Its Lift to Square-Integrable Random Vectors: Standing Notation §wasserstein).

Claim 2. By (3) and the monotonicity and product rule of log\log (The Natural Logarithm, with claim 4 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function), logρs(y)log(12cs)s1(y2+R02)\log\rho_{s}(y)\ge\log(\tfrac12c_{s})-s^{-1}(\lVert y\rVert^{2}+R_{0}^{2}). By The Function slogss\log s: Continuity, Young's Inequality and Lower Bounds, with the Elementary Bounds for the Exponential and the Logarithm §log and the bound ρsA0sd/2\rho_{s}\le A_{0}s^{-d/2} of Gaussian Smoothing of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space: Regularity, Mass, Duality, Approximation of a Bounded Function with a Modulus of Continuity, and the Pairing Identity §regularity, logρs(y)ρs(y)1A0sd/2\log\rho_{s}(y)\le\rho_{s}(y)-1\le A_{0}s^{-d/2}. So logρs(y)K0+s1y2|\log\rho_{s}(y)|\le K_{0}+s^{-1}\lVert y\rVert^{2} with K0=A0sd/2+log(12cs)+s1R02K_{0}=A_{0}s^{-d/2}+|\log(\tfrac12c_{s})|+s^{-1}R_{0}^{2}. With ϕ(u)=ulogu\phi(u)=u\log u as in The Entropy of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space, the function ϕρs\phi\circ\rho_{s} is Borel and satisfies ϕρs(y)ρs(y)(K0+s1y2)|\phi\circ\rho_{s}(y)|\le\rho_{s}(y)(K_{0}+s^{-1}\lVert y\rVert^{2}), whose λd\lambda_{d}-integral is K0+s1M2(μs)<K_{0}+s^{-1}M_{2}(\mu_{s})<\infty. Since ρs\rho_{s} is a density of μs\mu_{s} with respect to λd\lambda_{d}, The Entropy of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space §entropy gives μsP2Ent(Rd)\mu_{s}\in\mathcal{P}_{2}^{\mathrm{Ent}}(\mathbb{R}^{d}).

Claim 3. Measurability and bound. The components ρs1iρs\rho_{s}^{-1}\partial_{i}\rho_{s} of rsr_{s} are continuous by claim 2 of Continuity of the Reciprocal of a Nonvanishing Real-Valued Function on a Metric Space and claim 5 of Continuity of Sums and Products of Real-Valued Functions on a Metric Space, so rsr_{s} is Borel. Fix yy and let wy(x)=gs(yx)ρs(y)1w_{y}(x)=g_{s}(y-x)\rho_{s}(y)^{-1}, so that wy0w_{y}\ge0 and wydμ=1\int w_{y}\,d\mu=1. By (2), rs(y)=s1(yx)wy(x)μ(dx)r_{s}(y)=-s^{-1}\int(y-x)w_{y}(x)\mu(dx) componentwise. Hoelder's Inequality, for Two and for Finitely Many Factors §holder with both exponents equal to 22 (applied to yixiwy|y_{i}-x_{i}|\sqrt{w_{y}} and wy\sqrt{w_{y}}) gives ((yixi)wydμ)2(yixi)2wydμ(\int(y_{i}-x_{i})w_{y}\,d\mu)^{2}\le\int(y_{i}-x_{i})^{2}w_{y}\,d\mu. Summing over ii,

rs(y)2ρs(y)s2yx2gs(yx)μ(dx).\lVert r_{s}(y)\rVert^{2}\rho_{s}(y)\le s^{-2}\int\lVert y-x\rVert^{2}g_{s}(y-x)\mu(dx).

Integrating in yy with Tonelli and translation invariance, rs2dμss2 ⁣ ⁣z2gs(z)dzμ(dx)=s2ds=ds1\int\lVert r_{s}\rVert^{2}d\mu_{s}\le s^{-2}\int\!\!\int\lVert z\rVert^{2}g_{s}(z)\,dz\,\mu(dx)=s^{-2}ds=ds^{-1}.

Convexity. The logarithm is smooth on the open set (0,)(0,\infty) with log(u)=u1\log'(u)=u^{-1} (The Natural Logarithm), and ρs\rho_{s} is C2C^{2} with values in (0,)(0,\infty) by (3). So Φ(y)=12y2+slogρs(y)\Phi(y)=\tfrac12\lVert y\rVert^{2}+s\log\rho_{s}(y) is of class C2C^{2} by A Composition of CkC^k Maps Between Euclidean Open Sets is of Class CkC^k and Constants, Coordinate Functions, Sums and Products of CkC^k Functions on a Euclidean Open Set, with iΦ=yi+sρs1iρs\partial_{i}\Phi=y_{i}+s\rho_{s}^{-1}\partial_{i}\rho_{s} and

jiΦ=δij+s(jiρsρsiρsjρsρs2)\partial_{j}\partial_{i}\Phi=\delta_{ij}+s\Bigl(\frac{\partial_{j}\partial_{i}\rho_{s}}{\rho_{s}}-\frac{\partial_{i}\rho_{s}\,\partial_{j}\rho_{s}}{\rho_{s}^{2}}\Bigr)

by claim 1 of A Composition of CkC^k Maps Between Euclidean Open Sets is of Class CkC^k, Reciprocal Rule for One-Dimensional Derivatives and the product rule. So Φ=id+srs\nabla\Phi=\mathrm{id}+s\,r_{s}. Write u(x)=yxu(x)=y-x and mi=uiwydμm_{i}=\int u_{i}w_{y}\,d\mu at a fixed yy. By (2), ρs1iρs=s1mi\rho_{s}^{-1}\partial_{i}\rho_{s}=-s^{-1}m_{i} and ρs1jiρs=s2uiujwydμs1δij\rho_{s}^{-1}\partial_{j}\partial_{i}\rho_{s}=s^{-2}\int u_{i}u_{j}w_{y}\,d\mu-s^{-1}\delta_{ij}, so

jiΦ(y)=s1(uiujwydμmimj).\partial_{j}\partial_{i}\Phi(y)=s^{-1}\Bigl(\int u_{i}u_{j}w_{y}\,d\mu-m_{i}m_{j}\Bigr).

The integrands are bounded (The Gaussian Kernels on Euclidean Space: Scaling, Derivatives up to Order Three, the Convolution Identity, Moments and Tails §bounds with the formulas of The Gaussian Kernels on Euclidean Space: Scaling, Derivatives up to Order Three, the Convolution Identity, Moments and Tails §derivatives). For vRdv\in\mathbb{R}^{d}, bilinearity gives vTD2Φ(y)v=s1((vu)2wydμ((vu)wydμ)2)0v^{\mathsf T}D^{2}\Phi(y)v=s^{-1}\bigl(\int(v\cdot u)^{2}w_{y}\,d\mu-(\int(v\cdot u)w_{y}\,d\mu)^{2}\bigr)\ge0, by Hölder as above with vuv\cdot u in place of uiu_{i}. So 0dD2Φ(y)0_{d}\preceq D^{2}\Phi(y) for every yy (The Positive Semidefinite Ordering on Symmetric Matrices). Since Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} is open and convex, and Φ\Phi has continuous partial derivatives of orders one and two (C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set), which is the C2C^{2} hypothesis of A Function of Class C2C^2 with Positive Semidefinite Hessian is Convex, that theorem shows that Φ\Phi is convex.

Tangency and the score. Since Φ22id2+2s2rs2\lVert\nabla\Phi\rVert^{2}\le2\lVert\mathrm{id}\rVert^{2}+2s^{2}\lVert r_{s}\rVert^{2} (Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §functions) is μs\mu_{s}-integrable, The Gradient of a Convex Continuously Differentiable Function Belongs to the Tangent Space When It Is Square-Integrable §tangent gives ΦTμs\nabla\Phi\in T_{\mu_{s}}. Also idTμs\mathrm{id}\in T_{\mu_{s}} by Basic Properties of the Tangent Space: Closed Subspace, the Identity Map Belongs to It, Second-Moment Limits, and Representation of Bounded Functionals on Gradients §identity, and TμsT_{\mu_{s}} is a linear subspace (Basic Properties of the Tangent Space: Closed Subspace, the Identity Map Belongs to It, Second-Moment Limits, and Representation of Bounded Functionals on Gradients §closed), so rs=s1(Φid)Tμsr_{s}=s^{-1}(\nabla\Phi-\mathrm{id})\in T_{\mu_{s}}. Now The Score of a Measure with a Positive Continuously Differentiable Density applies with the density ρs\rho_{s} (of class C1C^{1} and positive), the measure μsP2(Rd)\mu_{s}\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) and the field rsr_{s} (square-integrable). The Score of a Measure with a Positive Continuously Differentiable Density §projection gives μsP2I(Rd)\mu_{s}\in\mathcal{P}_{2}^{\mathcal{I}}(\mathbb{R}^{d}), and The Score of a Measure with a Positive Continuously Differentiable Density §equality gives ξμs=rs\xi_{\mu_{s}}=r_{s}.

Claim 4. Let μP2I(Rd)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}^{\mathcal{I}}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) and ψCc(Rd)\psi\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}^{d}). Each iψ\partial_{i}\psi is again a test function: it is smooth (Smooth Map on a Euclidean Open Set) and compactly supported (claim 1 of The Gradient of a Test Function is Bounded and Square-Integrable, and Its Laplacian Bounded and Integrable, Against Every Probability Measure). So ψ\psi, its first partials and its second partials are bounded (same claim). By The Convolution of a Bounded Continuous Function with a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space: Continuity, Boundedness and Differentiation Under the Integral §derivative, applied to ψ\psi and then to each iψ\partial_{i}\psi with the probability measure γs\gamma_{s}, the function Ψ=ψγs\Psi=\psi*\gamma_{s} is of class C2C^{2} with iΨ=(iψ)γs\partial_{i}\Psi=(\partial_{i}\psi)*\gamma_{s} and jiΨ=(jiψ)γs\partial_{j}\partial_{i}\Psi=(\partial_{j}\partial_{i}\psi)*\gamma_{s}, all bounded (The Convolution of a Bounded Continuous Function with a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space: Continuity, Boundedness and Differentiation Under the Integral §continuous); in particular ΔΨ=(Δψ)γs\Delta\Psi=(\Delta\psi)*\gamma_{s} by linearity of the integral. By Finite Fisher Information, the Score and the Fisher Information of a Probability Measure §score, Step 0 with ϕ=Δψ\phi=\Delta\psi, and Gradients of Functions with Bounded Derivatives Belong to the Tangent Space; Constants Are Tangent; the Score Identity; the Score Has Mean Zero; Translation of Tangent Fields §score-identity applied to μ\mu and f=Ψf=\Psi,

ξμs,ψμs=Δψdμs=(Δψ)γsdμ=ΔΨdμ=ξμ,Ψμ.\langle\xi_{\mu_{s}},\nabla\psi\rangle_{\mu_{s}}=-\int\Delta\psi\,d\mu_{s}=-\int(\Delta\psi)*\gamma_{s}\,d\mu=-\int\Delta\Psi\,d\mu=\langle\xi_{\mu},\nabla\Psi\rangle_{\mu}.

By Hölder with respect to γs\gamma_{s} as in Claim 3, Ψ(x)2=i((iψ)γs)(x)2(ψ2γs)(x)\lVert\nabla\Psi(x)\rVert^{2}=\sum_{i}((\partial_{i}\psi)*\gamma_{s})(x)^{2}\le(\lVert\nabla\psi\rVert^{2}*\gamma_{s})(x), so Step 0 gives Ψμ2ψ2γsdμ=ψμs2\lVert\nabla\Psi\rVert_{\mu}^{2}\le\int\lVert\nabla\psi\rVert^{2}*\gamma_{s}\,d\mu=\lVert\nabla\psi\rVert_{\mu_{s}}^{2}. By The Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality in a Real Inner Product Space in L2(μ;Rd)L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d}), ξμs,ψμsξμμψμs|\langle\xi_{\mu_{s}},\nabla\psi\rangle_{\mu_{s}}|\le\lVert\xi_{\mu}\rVert_{\mu}\lVert\nabla\psi\rVert_{\mu_{s}}. Now apply Basic Properties of the Tangent Space: Closed Subspace, the Identity Map Belongs to It, Second-Moment Limits, and Representation of Bounded Functionals on Gradients §representation at μs\mu_{s} with the linear functional (ψ)=ξμs,ψμs\ell(\psi)=\langle\xi_{\mu_{s}},\nabla\psi\rangle_{\mu_{s}} and C=ξμμC=\lVert\xi_{\mu}\rVert_{\mu}. The unique element of TμsT_{\mu_{s}} representing \ell is ξμs\xi_{\mu_{s}}, and its norm is at most CC.

Claim 5. By (R) applied to h|h|, and since μ(Bˉ(0Rd,R))=1\mu(\bar{B}(0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}},R))=1 while exp\exp is increasing and multiplicative (claims 1 and 4 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function),

hdμsAexp(BR)exp(Bz)gs(z)dz.\int|h|\,d\mu_{s}\le A\exp(BR)\int\exp(B\lVert z\rVert)g_{s}(z)\,dz .

Since 0(Bs12s1/2z)20\le(B\sqrt{s}-\tfrac12s^{-1/2}\lVert z\rVert)^{2}, one has BzB2s+14s1z2B\lVert z\rVert\le B^{2}s+\tfrac14s^{-1}\lVert z\rVert^{2}. Hence exp(Bz)gs(z)exp(B2s)csexp(z2/(4s))=exp(B2s)csc2s1g2s(z)\exp(B\lVert z\rVert)g_{s}(z)\le\exp(B^{2}s)\,c_{s}\exp(-\lVert z\rVert^{2}/(4s))=\exp(B^{2}s)\,c_{s}c_{2s}^{-1}g_{2s}(z), where g2sg_{2s} is defined because 2s12s\le1. The weight g2sg_{2s} has integral 11, and csc2s1=(2)dc_{s}c_{2s}^{-1}=(\sqrt2)^{d} by The Gaussian Kernels on Euclidean Space: Scaling, Derivatives up to Order Three, the Convolution Identity, Moments and Tails §scaling. So hdμsAexp(BR+B2s)(2)d<\int|h|\,d\mu_{s}\le A\exp(BR+B^{2}s)(\sqrt2)^{d}<\infty, and hh is μs\mu_{s}-integrable. \blacksquare

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Comments

Loading…