Each clause follows from the fact that a.e. statements are closed under finite intersections and enlargement, together with the a.e. invariance of the seminorm and of the integral.
For functions write
so that, for , means that holds -almost everywhere (A Property Holding Almost Everywhere (i)). Two facts about almost-everywhere statements are used throughout: if and hold -a.e., so does , and if holds -a.e. and , then holds -a.e. (Null Sets and Properties Holding Almost Everywhere (vii), Null Sets and Properties Holding Almost Everywhere (vi)).
Equivalence relation. Let . Since and with and (Measure, Measure Space, and Probability Measure (i)), the set is -null (Null Set of a Measure (i)), so . Since , implies . Finally
so and imply . Thus is reflexive, symmetric and transitive, an equivalence relation (Equivalence Relations on a Set (i)).
Compatibility. The functions , , and lie in by Minkowski's Inequality (i). Since the operations are pointwise,
so and .
The seminorm. The function is measurable and for almost every , so by Elementary Properties of the p-Seminorm (vi).
The integral of a product. By Hölder's Inequality (ii), and lie in ; in particular is measurable. Since
we have almost everywhere, and by The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets (iii).
Loading…